Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:04:26.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Grammatical Acceptability in Mandarin Chinese

from Part Four - Syntax-semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2022

By
Yao Yao ,
Zhi-Guo Xie ,
Chien-Jer Charles Lin  and
Chu-Ren Huang
Edited by
Chu-Ren Huang ,
Yen-Hwei Lin ,
I-Hsuan Chen  and
Yu-Yin Hsu
Chu-Ren Huang
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Yen-Hwei Lin
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
I-Hsuan Chen
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Yu-Yin Hsu
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we address the issues related to sentence grammaticality and acceptability. We begin with a discussion of the relationship between the two notions, and point out that despite the differences in theoretical conceptualization, the two notions, grammaticality and acceptability, are often confluent and that grammaticality is usually measured as acceptability in linguistic research. We then discuss factors beyond syntax that may influence sentence acceptability, including processing factors and semantic/pragmatic considerations. Finally, we discuss the measurement of acceptability, via either experimental methods or corpus-based analyses. To conclude, we show in this chapter how grammaticality, a seemingly purely syntactic notion, is often materialized as acceptability, which encompasses multiple linguistic modules that go beyond syntax.

Keywords

sentence acceptabilitygrammaticalityprocessingChinese
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Chinese Linguistics , pp. 669 - 706
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Barbara. 1993. A pragmatic account of the definiteness effect in existencial sentences. Journal of Pragmatics 19(1):39–55. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378216693900692.Google Scholar
Badan, Linda, and Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2011. On the syntax of topic and focus in Chinese. In Mapping the left periphery: The cartography of syntactic structures (Volume 5), ed. Benincà, Paola and Munaro, Nicola, 63–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bard, Ellen Gurman, Robertson, Dan, and Sorace, Antonella. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72(1):32–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bever, Thomas G. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Cognition and the development of language, ed. Hayes, John R., 279–362. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn, and Griffin, Zenzi M.. 2000. The persistence of structural priming: Transient activations or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129(2):177–192.Google Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, and Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2007. The wolf in sheep’s clothing: Against a new judgement-driven imperialism. Theoretical Linguistics 33(3):319–333.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2007. Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base, ed. Featherston, Sam, and Sternefeld, Wolfgang, 75–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Ford, Marilyn. 2010. Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1):168–213.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana, and Harald Baayen, R.. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Cognitive foundations of interpretation, ed. Bouma, Gerlof, Krämer, Irene, and Zwarts, Joost, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Nikitina, Tatiana. 2009. The gradience of the dative alternation. In Reality exploration and discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life, ed. Uyechi, Linda, and Wee, Lian-Hee, 161–184. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Carroll, John M., Bever, Thomas G., and Pollack, Chava R.. 1981. The non-uniqueness of linguistic intuitions. Language 57(2):368–383.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1961. What is correct Chinese? Journal of the American Oriental Society 81(3):171–177.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, I-Hsuan, Kathleen, Ahrens, and Chu-Ren, Huang. 2022. The Chinese classifier system as a lexical-semantic system. In The Cambridge handbook of Chinese linguistics, ed. Huang, Chu-Ren, Lin, Yen-Hwei, Chen, I-Hsuan, and Hsu, Yu-Yin, 550–577. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Keh-Jiann, Huang, Chu-Ren, Chang, Li-Ping, and Hsu, Hui-Li. 1996. Sinica Corpus: Design methodology for balanced corpora. Proceeding of the 11th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, Seoul, 167–176. www.aclweb.org/anthology/Y96-1018/.Google Scholar
Chersoni, Emmanuele, Santus, Enrico, Lenci, Alessandro, Blache, Philippe, and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2021. Not all arguments are processed equally: a distributional model of argument complexity. Language Resources and Evaluation, 1–28 (Online first). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10579–021-09533-9.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. New York, NY: Hague and Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, CA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgements. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
De Cuypere, Ludovic. 2015. A multivariate analysis of the Old English ACC+DAT double object alternation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11(2):225–254.Google Scholar
De Cuypere, Ludovic, Baten, Kristof, and Rawoens, Gudrun. 2014. A corpus-based analysis of the Swedish passive alternation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37(2):199–223.Google Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar, Dabrowska, Ewa, and Arppe, Antti. 2016. Machine meets man: Evaluating the psychological reality of corpus-based probabilistic models. Cognitive Linguistics 27(1):1–34. www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cog-2015-0101/html.Google Scholar
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka. 2018. Clausal comparison without degree abstraction in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36(2):445–482. https://dokumen.tips/reader/f/clausal-comparison-without-degree-abstraction-in-comparison-without-degree-abstraction.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Kenneth I. 1981. Frequency blocking and lexical access: One mental lexicon or two? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20(2):190–203. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002253718190373X.Google Scholar
Forster, Kenneth I., and Chambers, Susan M.. 1973. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12(6):627–635.Google Scholar
Foss, Donald J. 1969. Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8:457–462.Google Scholar
Fukuda, Shin, Grant, Goodall, Dan, Michel, and Henry, Beecher. 2012. Is magnitude estimation worth the trouble? Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL29), Tucson, 328–336. www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/29/abstract2718.html.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann. 1984. Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113:256–281. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311894/.Google Scholar
Godfrey, John J., Holliman, Edward C., and Mcdaniel, Jane. 1992. Switchboard: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. Proceedings of 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-92), San Francisco, 517–520.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, and Bresnan, Joan. 2006. Spoken syntax: The phonetics of giving a hand in New Zealand English. Linguistic Review 23(3):321–349.Google Scholar
Her, One-Soon. 1991. Topic as a grammatical function in Chinese. Lingua 84(1):1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Jianhua, and Pan, Haihua. 2007. Focus and the basic function of Chinese existential you-sentences. Existence: Semantics and syntax, ed. Comorovski, Ileana and Von Heusinger, Klaus, 133–145. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Hu, Jianhua, and Pan, Haihua. 2009. Decomposing the aboutness condition for Chinese topic constructions. The Linguistic Review 26(2–3):371–384.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren. 2015. Notes on Chinese grammar and ontology: The endurant/perdurant dichotomy and Mandarin D-M compounds. Lingua Sinica 1(1):1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren. Forthcoming. Grammarability.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, and Academia Sinica. 1989. Subcategorized topics in Mandarin Chinese. In Proceedings of Conference of the Chinese Language Teachers Association (CLTA) Annual Meeting (Nov 1989), Boston, 17–19.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, Lin, Jingxia, Jiang, Menghan, and Xu, Hongzhi. 2014. Corpus-based study and identification of Mandarin Chinese light verb variations. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Applying NLP Tools to Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects, Dublin, 1–10. www.aclweb.org/anthology/W14-5301/.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, and Shi, Dingxu. 2016. A Reference Grammar of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. www.cambridge.org/core/books/reference-grammar-of-chinese/CAA5F468D2F9C97B08E0FF3FB84E3CE3.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, and Wang, Shichang. 黃居仁, 王世昌. 2016. The application of crowdsourcing strategy in utilizing language resources 眾包策略在語言資源建設中的應用. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning 語言戰略研究 1(6):36–46.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1987. Existential sentences in Chinese and (in) definiteness. In The representation of (in)definiteness, ed. Reuland, Eric J. and Ter Meulen, Alice G. B., 226–253. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, and Luther Liu, C.-S.. 2001. Logophoricity, attitudes, and ziji at the interface. In Syntax and Semantics 33: Long distance reflexives, ed. Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella, and James Huang, C.-T., 141–195. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 1994. The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jäschke, Katja, and Plag, Ingo. 2016. The dative alternation in German-English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38(3):485–521.Google Scholar
Jiang, Li Julie, Jenks, Peter, and Jin, Jing. 2021. The syntax of classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. The Chinese classifier system as a lexical-semantic system. In The Cambridge handbook of Chinese linguistics, ed. Huang, Chu-Ren, Lin, Yen-Hwei, Chen, I-Hsuan, and Hsu, Yu-Yin, 515–549. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler, Bresnan, Joan, and Van Herk, Gerard. 2011. The dative alternation in African American English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(2):229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, Victor, and Bresnan, Joan. 2012. The effects of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language 66(4):588–611.Google Scholar
Lee, Hanjung. 2016. Usage probability and subject–object asymmetries in Korean case ellipsis: Experiments with subject case ellipsis. Journal of Linguistics 52(1):70–110.Google Scholar
Leong, Che Kan, Tsung, Linda T. H., Tse, Shek Kam, Shum, Mark Shui Kee, and Ki, Wing Wah. 2012. Grammaticality judgment of Chinese and English sentences by native speakers of alphasyllabary: A reaction time study. International Journal of Bilingualism 16(4):428–445.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Chien-Jer Charles. 2012. Distinguihing grammatical and processing of syntactic acceptability. In In search of grammar: Experimental and corpus-based studies, ed. Myers, James, 119–137. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series 48. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Lin, Chien-Jer Charles. 2018. Subject prominence and processing filler-gap dependencies in prenominal relative clauses: The comprehension of possessive relative clauses and adjunct relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese. Language 94(4):758–797.Google Scholar
Luo, Qiongpeng, Xie, Zhi-guo, and Hsieh, Miao-Ling. 2015. A degree-based analysis of the differential verbal comparatives in Chinese. In Papers presented at the 10th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (TEAL-10), June 13–14, 2015. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Mahowald, Kyle, Graff, Peter, Hartman, Jeremy, and Gibson, Edward. 2016. SNAP judgments: A small N acceptability paradigm (SNAP) for linguistic acceptability judgments. Language 92(3):619–635.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary L. 1974. Existential sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/13021.Google Scholar
Morzycki, Marcin. 2009. Degree modification of gradable nouns: Size adjectives and adnominal degree morphemes. Natural Language Semantics 17(2):175–203.Google Scholar
Morzycki, Marcin. 2015. Modification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Munro, Robert, Bethard, Steven, Kuperman, Victor, Lai, Vicky Tzuyin, Melnick, Robin, Potts, Christopher, Schnoebelen, Tyler, and Tily, Harry. 2010. Crowdsourcing and language studies: The new generation of linguistic data. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, (June), Los Angeles, 122–130. www.aclweb.org/anthology/volumes/W10-07/.Google Scholar
Nagata, Hiroshi. 1988. The relativity of linguistic intuition: The effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 17(1):1–17.Google Scholar
Nagata, Hiroshi. 1989. Judgments of sentence grammatically with differentiation and enrichment strategies. Perceptual and Motor Skills 68(2):463–469.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1983. Grammatical theory: Its limits and its possibilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Haihua. 1998. Closeness, prominence, and binding theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16(4):771–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1979. Where’s English? In Individual differences in language ability and language behavior, ed. Fillmore, Charles J., Kempler, Daniel, and Wang, William S.-Y., 127–163. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shi, Dingxu. 2000. Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76(2):383–408.Google Scholar
Shih, Stephanie, Grafmiller, Jason, Futrell, Richard, and Bresnan, Joan. 2012. Rhythm’s role in genitive construction choice in spoken English. In Rhythm in phonetics, grammar and cognition, ed. Vogel, Ralf and van de Vijver, Ruben, 207–234. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon. 2011. A test of the cognitive assumptions of magnitude estimation: Commutativity does not hold for acceptability judgments. Language 87(2):274–288.Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon, and Almeida, Diogo. 2012. Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 48(3):609–652.Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon, Schütze, Carson T., and Almeida, Diogo 2013. A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua 134:219–248.Google Scholar
Starr, Rebecca L. 2015. Predicting NP forms in vernacular written Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 43(1A):54–89.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2005. Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1):113–150.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2006. Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English: A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Rosenbach, Anette, Bresnan, Joan, and Wolk, Christoph. 2014. Culturally conditioned language change? A multi-variate analysis of genitive constructions in ARCHER. In Late modern English syntax, ed. Hundt, Marianne, 133–152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taft, Marcus. 1979. Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition 7:263–272. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03197599.Google Scholar
Thuilier, Juliette. 2014. An experimental approach to French attributive adjective syntax. In Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 10, ed. Piñón, C., 287–304. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01451697.Google Scholar
Thuilier, Juliette, Abeillé, Anne, and Crabbé, Benoît. 2014. Ordering preferences for postverbal complements in French. In French through corpora: Ecological and data-driven perspectives in French language studies, ed. Tyne, Henry, André, Virginie, and Benzitoun, Christophe, 77–103. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01105151.Google Scholar
Tily, Harry, Gahl, Susanne, Arnon, Inbal, Snider, Neal, Kothari, Anubha, and Bresnan, Joan. 2009. Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation in spontaneous speech. Language and Cognition 1(2):147–165.Google Scholar
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1977. A functional study of topic in Chinese: The first step toward discourse analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1989. Comparison in Chinese: A topic-comment approach. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 19:151–189. http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15799coll36/id/204665.Google Scholar
Vanderschueren, Clara, and De Cuypere, Ludovic. 2014. The inflected/non-inflected infinitive alternation in Portuguese adverbial clauses. A corpus analysis. Language Sciences 41:153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Shichang, Huang, Chu-Ren, Yao, Yao, and Chan, Angel. 2014. Exploring mental lexicon in an efficient and economic way: Crowdsourcing method for linguistic experiments. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of the Lexicon (CogALex), Dublin, 105–113. www.aclweb.org/anthology/W14-4715/.Google Scholar
Wang, Shichang, Huang, Chu-Ren, Yao, Yao, and Angel, Chan. 2015. Mechanical Turk-based experiment vs laboratory-based experiment: A case study on the comparison of semantic transparency rating data. Proceedings of the 29th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC29), Shanghai, 53–62. www.aclweb.org/anthology/Y15-1007/.Google Scholar
Wang, Shichang, Huang, Chu-Ren, Yao, Yao, and Chana, Angel. 2017. Word intuition agreement among Chinese speakers: A Mechanical Turk-based study. Lingua Sinica 3(1):1–18. https://linguasinica.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40655–017-0032-5.Google Scholar
Wang, Shichang, Huang, Chu-Ren, Yao, Yao, and Chan, Angel. 2019. The effect of morphological structure on semantic transparency ratings. Language and Linguistics 20(2):225–255.Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory, and Birner, Betty J.. 1995. Definiteness and the English existential. Language 71(4):722–742.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 2002. Postverbal behavior. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Whaley, Charles. P. 1978. Word–nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17:143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolk, Christoph, Bresnan, Joan, and Rosenbach, Anette. 2013. Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica 30(3):382–419.Google Scholar
Wu, Yunfang. 2003. Study on Chinese coordination for Chinese information processing. Doctoral dissertation, Peking University.Google Scholar
Xie, Zhi-guo. 2014. Where is the standard? An analysis of size adjectives as degree modifiers at the semantic-pragmatic interface. Language and Linguistics 15(4):513–538.Google Scholar
Xu, Hongzhi, Jiang, Menghan, Lin, Jingxia, and Huang, Chu-Ren. 2020. Light verb variations and varieties of Mandarin Chinese: Comparable corpus driven approaches to grammatical variations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory (ahead-of-print).Google Scholar
Yao, Yao. 2014. Predicting the use of BA construction in Mandarin Chinese discourse: A modeling study with two verbs. In Proceedings of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computing (PACLIC28), Phuket, 561–567. www.aclweb.org/anthology/Y14-1064/.Google Scholar
Yao, Yao. 2018. NP weight effects in word order variation in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua Sinica 4(5):1–31. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40655–018-0037-8.Google Scholar
Yao, Yao, and Liu, Feng-hsi. 2010. A working report on statistically modeling dative variation in Mandarin Chinese. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2010), Beijing, 1236–1244. www.aclweb.org/anthology/C10-1139/.Google Scholar
Ye, Zheng, Luo, Yue-Jia, Friederici, Angela D., and Zhou, Xiaolin. 2006. Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research 1071:186–196. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000689930501694X?via%3Dihub.Google Scholar
Yu, Jing, and Zhang, Yaxu. 2008. When Chinese semantics meets failed syntax. Neuroreport 19(7):745–749.Google Scholar
Yu, Xi, Bi, Yanchao, Han, Zaizhu, and Law, Sam-Po. 2013. An fMRI study of grammatical morpheme processing associated with nouns and verbs in Chinese. PLoS ONE 8(10):e74952. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074952.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yaxu, and Zhang, Jingting. 2008. Brain responses to agreement violations of Chinese grammatical aspect. Neuroreport 19(10):1039–1043.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×