Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:00:10.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Gender in Decolonial Indigenous Perspectives

from Part Three - Resistances and Intersections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2023

By
Olga Ulturgasheva
Edited by
Cecilia McCallum ,
Silvia Posocco  and
Martin Fotta
Cecilia McCallum
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil
Silvia Posocco
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Martin Fotta
Affiliation:
Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides a critical review of the latest debates within Indigenous gender studies that aim to advance understanding and awareness of gender relations and gender-based ideologies shaped in response to socioeconomic upheavals associated with patriarchal colonialism. Drawing from a spate of recent publications of gender-focused Indigenous studies, the discussion examines what theoretical and onto-epistemological insights are offered by Indigenous scholars involved in attempts to trace gender conflicts and tensions while identifying their implications for the contemporary constructions of gender, sex, indigeneity, and decolonization. Focusing on the studies of Indigenous gender formations with their nonbinary, ungendered, or genderless foundations in the circumpolar North and beyond, the author looks at how Indigenous gender studies continue questioning and challenging the deep-seated heteropatriarchal divisions, colonial heteronormativity, biological determinism, and neocolonial discourses on indigeneity.

Keywords

decolonizationgenderindigeneityfluidityonto-epistemologynonbinarismgenderlessnessIndigenous studies
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality , pp. 370 - 394
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, D. W. (1995). Education for Extinction: American Indians and the Boarding School Experience, 1875–1928. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Alatas, S. H. (2000). Intellectual imperialism: definition, traits, and problems. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 28(1), 23–45.Google Scholar
Arvin, M., Tuck, E., and Morrill, A. (2013). Decolonizing feminism: challenging connections between settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy. Feminist Formations, 25(1), 8–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, T. (1973). Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. London: Ithaca Press.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battiste, M. (2001). Decolonizing the university: ethical guidelines for research involving Indigenous populations. In Findlay, L. M. and Bidwell, P. M., eds., Pursuing Academic Freedom: “Free and Fearless”? Saskatoon: Purich Press, pp. 190–203.Google Scholar
Behrendt, L. (2019). Indigenous storytelling: decolonizing institutions and assertive self-determination: implications for legal practice. In Archibald, J., Lee-Morgan, J. B., and Santolo, J., eds., Decolonizing Research: Indigenous Storywork as Methodology. London: Zed Books, pp. 175–86.Google Scholar
Betz, H.-G. (2017). Nativism across time and space. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 335–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhabha, H. K. (1984). Of mimicry and man: the ambivalence of colonial discourse. Discipleship: A Special Issue on Psychoanalysis, 28, 125–33.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H. K. (1990). Interrogating identity: the postcolonial prerogative. In Goldberg, D. T., ed., Anatomy of Racism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 183–209.Google Scholar
Bloch, A. (2005). Longing for the “Kollektiv”: gender, power, and residential schools in central Siberia. Cultural Anthropology, 20(4), 534–69.Google Scholar
Bodenhorn, B. (1990). “I’m not the great hunter, my wife is”: Iñupiat and anthropological models of gender. Études/Inuit/Studies, 14(1–2), 55–74. www.jstor.org/stable/42869683 (accessed July 10, 2020).Google Scholar
Bodenhorn, B. (2006). Calling into being: naming and speaking names in Alaska’s North Slope. In vom Bruck, G. and Bodenhorn, B., eds., Anthropology of Names and Naming. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–56.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, T. (2016). From whom the ontology turns: theorizing the digital real. Current Anthropology, 57(4), 387–407.Google Scholar
Bogoras, V. (1987 [1899]). Vosem’ Plemen: Voskreshyje Plemya [Eight Tribes: The Reincarnated Tribe]. Irkutsk: Vostochno-Sibirskoije Izdaniye, pp. 471–527.Google Scholar
Bombay, A. (2014). Origins of Lateral Violence in Aboriginal Communities: A Preliminary Study of Student-to-Student Abuse in Residential Schools. Ottawa: Aboriginal Healing Foundation.Google Scholar
Brightman, M., Grotti, V., and Ulturgasheva, O. (2006). Introduction: rethinking the “frontier” in Amazonia and Siberia: extractive economies, indigenous politics and social transformations. In special issue of Cambridge Anthropology, 26(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
Brodkin, K., Morgen, S., and Hutchinson, J. (2011). Anthropology as white public space? American Anthropologist, 113(4), 545–56.Google Scholar
Callison, C. (2014). How Climate Change Comes to Matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Coombe, R. (2011). “Possessing culture”: political economies of community subjects and their properties. In Strang, V. and Busse, M., eds., Ownership and Appropriation. Oxford: Berg, pp. 105–27.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 14, 138–67.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–99.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, J. (1998). The Social Life of Stories: Narrative and Knowledge in Yukon Territory. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Datta, R. (2017). Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research. Research Ethics, 14(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
Denetdale, J. N. (2006). Chairmen, presidents, and princesses: the Navajo Nation, gender, and the politics of tradition. Wicazo Sa Review, 21(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., and Smith, L. T. (2008). Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driskill, Q.-L. (2011). Queer Indigenous Studies: Critical Interventions in Theory, Politics and Literature. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Fienup-Riordan, A. (1986). The real people: the concept of personhood among the Yup’ik Eskimos of Western Alaska. Études/Inuit/Studies, 10(1–2), 261–70.Google Scholar
Finley, C. (2011). Decolonizing the queer native body (and recovering the native bull-dyke): bringing “sexy” back and out of native studies’ closet. In Driskill, Q.-L., Finley, C., Gilley, B., and Morgensen, S. L., eds., Queer Indigenous Studies: Critical Interventions in Theory, Politics, and Literature. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
Halberstam, J. (1998). Female Masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (2020). Nativist-populism, the internet and the geopolitics of indigenous diaspora. Political Geography, 78(4), 102–24.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005). The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hokowitu, B. (2015). Taxonomies of indigeneity: indigenous heterosexual patriarchal masculinity. In Innes, R. and Anderson, K., eds., Indigenous Masculinities: Legacies, Identities and Regeneration. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, pp. 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hokowitu, B. (2016). Monster: post-indigenous studies. In Moreton-Robinson, A., ed., Critical Indigenous Studies: Engagements in First World Locations, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 83–101.Google Scholar
Innes, R., and Anderson, K. (2015). Who’s walking with our brothers? In Innes, R. and Anderson, K., eds., Indigenous Masculinities: Legacies, Identities and Regeneration. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, pp. 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, E.-E., Thomas, W., and Lang, S. (2010). Two-Spirit People: Native American Gender Identity, Sexuality, and Spirituality. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, P., and Pihama, L. (1995). What counts as difference and what differences count: gender, race and the politics of difference. In Irwin, K. and Ramsden, I., eds., Toi Wähine: The Worlds of Mäori Women. Auckland: Penguin, pp. 75–86.Google Scholar
Kovach, M. (2010). Indigenous Methodologies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (2003). The return of the native. Current Anthropology, 44, 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, H. (1997). Movements and transgression: human landscape in northeastern Sakhali. In Mousalimas, S. A., ed., Arctic Ecology and Identity. Budapest: Akademia Kiado; and Los Angeles: International Society for Trans-Oceanic Research, pp. 143–68.Google Scholar
Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. S., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 257–77.Google Scholar
Lang, S. (1997). Various kinds of two-spirit people: gender variance and homosexuality in Native American communities. In Jacobs, S., Thomas, W., and Lang, S., eds., Two-Spirit People: Native American Gender Identity, Sexuality, and Spirituality. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 100–17.Google Scholar
Lavallée, L. (2009). Practical application of an Indigenous research framework and Indigenous research methods: sharing circles and Anishnaabe symbol-based reflection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelstam Balzer, M. 2011. Shamans, Spirituality and Cultural Revitalization: Explorations in Siberia and Beyond. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McCallum, C. (2020). Making ecumenes: ontogeny, amity, and resistance in Brazilian indigenous pathways. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 26(3), 575–93.Google Scholar
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2000). Talkin’ up to the white woman: Indigenous women and feminism. In Hill, M., ed., Whiteness: A Critical Reader. New York: New York University Press, pp. 281–93.Google Scholar
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2013). Towards an Australian Indigenous women’s standpoint theory. Australian Feminist Studies, 28(78), 331–47.Google Scholar
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2015). The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2016). Race and cultural entrapment: critical Indigenous studies in the twenty-first century. In Moreton-Robinson, A., ed., Critical Indigenous Studies: Engagements in First World Locations. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 102–15.Google Scholar
Morgensen, S. L. (2015). Cutting to the roots of colonial masculinity. In Innes, R. and Anderson, K., eds., Indigenous Masculinities: Legacies, Identities and Regeneration. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, pp. 38–61.Google Scholar
Morrow, P. (2002). A woman’s vapor: Yupik bodily powers in southwest Alaska. Ethnology, 41(4), 335–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, P., and Hensel, C. (1992). Hidden dissension: minority–majority relationships and the use of contested terminology. Arctic Anthropology, 29(1), 38–53.Google Scholar
Morton, M. (2017). The Rising Politics of Indigeneity in Southeast Asia. Singapore: ISEAS, Yusof Ishak Institute.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and the cultural interface: underlying issues at the intersection of knowledge and information systems. IFLA Journal, 28(5–6), 281–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, M. (2007). The cultural interface. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36(S), 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. (2019). Black Feminism Reimagined: After Intersectionality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2010). Racism, ethnicity and the media in Africa: reflections inspired by studies of xenophobia in Cameroon and South Africa. Africa Spectrum, 45(1), 57–93.Google Scholar
Rasmus, S., and Ulturgasheva, O. (2017). From lone wolves to relational reindeer: sustainability of anthropological myths and methods in contemporary northern communities. In Fondahl, G. and Wilson, G., eds., Northern Sustainabilities: Vulnerability, Resilience, and Prosperity in the Circumpolar World. New York: Springer. pp. 142–62.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. (2020). Two-spirit identity in a time of gender fluidity. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(12), 1675–90.Google Scholar
Saladin d’Anglure, B. (1994). From foetus to shaman: the construction of an Inuit third sex. In Mills, A. and Slobodin, R., eds., Amerindian Rebirth: Reincarnation Belief among North American Indians and Inuit. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Simien, E. M. (2004). Black feminist theory: charting a course for black women’s studies in political science. Women & Politics, 26(2), 81–93.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T. (2010). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Aboriginal Peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Sneider, L. (2015). Complementary relationships: a review of indigenous gender studies. In Innes, R. and Anderson, K., eds., Indigenous Masculinities: Legacies, Identities and Regeneration. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, pp. 62–79.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L., eds., Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Houndmills: Macmillan, pp. 271–313.Google Scholar
Ssorin-Chaikov, N. (2003). The Social Life of the State in Subarctic Siberia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
TallBear, K. (2013). Genomic articulations of indigeneity. Social Studies of Science, 43(4), 509–33.Google Scholar
TallBear, K. (2016). Dear Indigenous Studies, it’s not me, it’s you. Why I left and what needs to change. In Moreton-Robinson, A., ed., Critical Indigenous Studies: Engagements in First World Locations. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TallBear, K. (2018). Making love and relations beyond settler sex and family. In Clarke, A. E. and Haraway, D., eds., Making Kin Not Population. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 145–66.Google Scholar
Tatonetti, L. (2015). “Tales of burning love”: female masculinity in contemporary native literature. In Innes, R. and Anderson, K., eds., Indigenous Masculinities: Legacies, Identities and Regeneration. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, pp. 130–44.Google Scholar
Todd, Z. (2016). “This is the life”: women’s role in food provisioning in Paulatuuq, Northwest Territories. In Kermoal, N. and Altamirano-Jimenez, I., eds., Living on the Land: Indigenous Women’s Understanding of Place. Athabasca: Athabasca University Press. pp. 160–85.Google Scholar
Todd, Z. (2020). Honouring our great grandmothers: an ode to Caroline LaFramboise, twentieth century Métis matriarch. In Nickel, S. and Fehr, A., eds., Good Relation: History, Gender, and Kinship in Indigenous Feminisms. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, pp. 171–81.Google Scholar
Trouillot, M. R. (1991). Anthropology and the savage slot. In Fox, R., ed., Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 17–45.Google Scholar
Ulturgasheva, O. (2012). Narrating the Future in Siberia: Childhood, Adolescence and Autobiography among the Eveny. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Ulturgasheva, O. (2013). Schastlivoye budusheye antiutopiyi postsotsializma [Happy futures in post-socialist anti-utopia]. In Ssorin-Chaikov, N., ed., Topografiya Schastya: Ethnograpficheskye Karty Moderna [Topography of Happiness: Ethnographic Contours of Modernity]. Moscow: Novoje Literaturnoje Obozreniye, pp. 219–33.Google Scholar
Ulturgasheva, O. (2014). Attaining Khinem: challenges, coping strategies and resilience among Eveny adolescents. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51(5), 632–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulturgasheva, O. (2016). Spirit of the future: movement, kinetic distribution and personhood among Siberian Eveny. Social Analysis (special issue, ed. K. Swancutt and M. Mazard, on “Animism beyond the soul: ontology, reflexivity, and the making of anthropological knowledge”), 60(1), 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulturgasheva, O. (2017). Ghosts of the Gulag in the Eveny world of the dead. Polar Journal, 7(1), 26–45.Google Scholar
Ulturgasheva, O., Rasmus, S., and Morrow, P. (2015). Collapsing the distance: indigenous youth engagement in a circumpolar study of youth resilience. Arctic Anthropology, 52(1), 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulturgasheva, O., Rasmus, S., Wexler, L., Nystad, K., and Kral, M. (2014). Arctic indigenous youth resilience and vulnerability: comparative analysis of adolescent experiences and resilience strategies across five circumpolar communities. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51(5), 735–56.Google Scholar
Vitebsky, P., and Wolfe, S. (2001). The separation of the sexes among Siberian reindeer herders. In Tremayne, S. and Low, A., eds., Women as “Sacred Custodians” of the Earth? Oxford: Berg, pp. 81–94.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. J. (2011). Inherit my heaven: Kalaallit gender relations. INUSSUK Arctic Research Journal 1. Government of Greenland, Department of Education, Church, Culture and Gender Equality.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. (2008). Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Winnipeg: Fernwood.Google Scholar
Wolfe, E. (1984). Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Woons, M., and Weier, S. (2017). Critical Epistemologies of Global Politics. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×