Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T19:36:13.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part Four - Desires and Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2023

Edited by
Cecilia McCallum ,
Silvia Posocco  and
Martin Fotta
Cecilia McCallum
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil
Silvia Posocco
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Martin Fotta
Affiliation:
Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality , pp. 489 - 600
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Biehl, J., Good, B., and Kleinman, A. (2007). Introduction: rethinking subjectivity. In Biehl, J., Good, B., and Kleinman, A., eds., Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Bleys, R. C. (1995). The Geography of Perversion: Male-to-Male Sexual Behaviour Outside the West and the Ethnographic Imagination, 1750–1918. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Boyce, P. (2007). “Conceiving kothis”: men who have sex with men in India and the cultural subject of HIV prevention. Medical Anthropology, 26(2), 175–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, P. (2013a). The object of attention: same-sex sexualities in small-town India and the contemporary sexual subject. In Srivastava, S., ed., Sexuality Studies. Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–202.Google Scholar
Boyce, P. (2013b). The ambivalent sexual subject: HIV prevention and male-to-male intimacy in India. In Aggleton, P., Boyce, P., Moore, H., and Parker, R., eds., Understanding Global Sexualities: New Frontiers. London: Routledge, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
Boyce, P. (2014). Desirable rights: same-sex sexual subjectivities, socio-economic development, global flows and boundaries. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(10), 1201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, P. (2020). Properties, substance, queer effects: ethnographic perspective and HIV prevention in India. In Boyce, P., Gonzalez-Polledo, EJ, and Posocco, S., eds., Queering Knowledge: Analytics, Devices and Investments after Marilyn Strathern. London: Routledge, pp. 92–112.Google Scholar
Boyce, P., and Cataldo, F. (2019). MSM-ing as a networking concept: becoming a global health category. Medicine, Anthropology, Theory, 6(4), 214–37. https://doi.org/10.17157/mat.6.4.707.Google Scholar
Boyce, P., and Dasgupta, R. K. (2019). Alternating sexualities: sociology and queer critiques in India. In Srivastava, S., Arif, Y., and Abraham, J., eds., Critical Themes in Indian Sociology. New Delhi: SAGE Publications, pp. 330–45.Google Scholar
Boyce, P., Dhall, P., Khurai, S., Yambung, O., Pebam, B., and Lairikyengbam, R. (2020). Gender diverse equality and wellbeing in Manipur, North East India: reflections on peer-led research. In Bell, S., Aggleton, P., and Gibson, A., eds., Peer Research in Health and Social Development: International Perspectives on Participatory Research. London: Routledge, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
Boyce, P., and Dutta, A. (2013). Vulnerability of gay and lesbian Indians goes way beyond section 377. The Conversation, December 15, https://theconversation.com/vulnerability-of-gay-and-transgender-indians-goes-way-beyond-section-377-21392 (accessed October 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Boyce, P., Engebretsen, E. L., and Posocco, S. (2016). Introduction: anthropology’s queer sensibilities. Sexualities, 21(5–6), 843–52.Google Scholar
Boyce, P., Huang Soo Lee, M., Jenkins, C., Mohamed, S., Overs, C., Paiva, V., Reid, E., Tan, M., and Aggleton, P. (2007). Putting sexuality (back) in HIV/AIDS: issues, themes and practice. Global Public Health, 2(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, P., and khanna, a. (2011). Rights and representations: querying the male-to-male sexual subject in India. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 13(1), 89–100.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (1995). States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Busby, C. (1997). Permeable and partible persons: a comparative analysis of gender and body in South India and Melanesia. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2(3), 261–78.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carstairs, G. M. (1957). The Twice-Born: A Study of a Community of High-Caste Hindus. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. (2005). The Kothi wars: AIDS cosmopolitanism and the morality of classification. In Adams, V. and Pigg, S. L., eds., Sex in Development: Science, Sexuality and Morality in Global Perspective. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 269–303.Google Scholar
Das, V., and Poole, D., eds. (2004). Anthropology in the Margins of the State. Santa Fe, NM: School of Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2002 [1992]). Force of law: the “mystical foundation of authority.” Trans. Mary Quaintance. In Anidjar, G., ed., Acts of Religion. New York: Routledge, pp. 230–98.Google Scholar
Dhall, P., and Boyce, P. (2015). Livelihood, exclusion and opportunity: socioeconomic welfare among gender and sexuality non-normative people in India (No. IDS Evidence Report, 106). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. (1980). Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dutta, A. (2012). An epistemology of collusion: hijras, kothis and the historical (dis)continuity of gender/sexual identities in eastern India. Gender & History, 24, 825–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta, A., and Roy, R. (2014). Decolonizing transgender in India: some reflections. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(3), 320–32.Google Scholar
Farmer, L. (2000). Reconstructing the English codification debate: the criminal law commissioners, 1833–45. Law and History Review, 18(2), 397–425.Google Scholar
Gagnon, J. H., and Parker, R. G. (1995). Introduction: conceiving sexuality. In Parker, R. G. and Gagnon, J. H., eds., Conceiving Sexuality: Approaches to Sex Research in a Postmodern World. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Goel, I. (2016). Hijra communities of Delhi. Sexualities, 19(5–6), 535–46.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Polledo, EJ. (2017). Transitioning: Matter, Gender, Thought. London. Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Polledo, EJ. (2020). Wild gender. In Boyce, P., Gonzalez-Polledo, EJ, and Posocco, S., eds., Queering Knowledge: Analytics, Devices and Investments after Marilyn Strathern. London: Routledge, pp. 20–36.Google Scholar
Graham, M. (2014). Anthropological Explorations in Queer Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, K. (1997). “Go suck your husband’s sugarcane!” Hijras and the use of sexual insult. In Livia, A. and Hall, K., eds., Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 430–60.Google Scholar
Herdt, G. (2001). Stigma and the ethnographic study of HIV: problems and prospects. AIDS and Behaviour, 5, 141–9.Google Scholar
Hossain, A. (2012). Beyond emasculation: being Muslim and becoming hijra in South Asia. Asian Studies Review, 36(4), 495–513.Google Scholar
Hossain, A., and Nanda, S. (2020). Globalization and change among the hijras of South Asia. In Ryan, J. M., ed., Trans Lives in a Globalizing World: Rights, Identities and Politics. London: Routledge Press, pp. 34–49.Google Scholar
Jaffrey, Z. (1998). The Invisibles: Tale of the Eunuchs of India. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
khanna, a. (2009). Taming of the shrewd Meyeli Chhele: a political economy of development’s sexual subject. Development, 52, 43–51.Google Scholar
khanna, a. (2013). Three hundred and seventy-seven ways of being. Journal of Historical Sociology, 26(1), 120–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
khanna, a. (2016). Sexualness. New Delhi: New Text.Google Scholar
khanna, a. (forthcoming). A Landscape Analysis of LGBTQI Activism in India. New York: Astraea Foundation.Google Scholar
khanna, a., and Correa, S., eds. (2014). Putting the Law in Its Place: Analyses of Recent Developments in Law Relating to Same-Sex Desire in India and Uganda. Rio de Janeiro and Brighton: Sexuality Policy Watch and Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Kleinman, A. (1999). Experience and its moral modes: culture, human conditions, and disorder. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 20, 355–420.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, H., and McKevitt, C. (2002). Anthropology in health research: from qualitative methods to multidisciplinarity. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 325(7357), 210–13.Google Scholar
Levitt, P., and Merry, S. (2009). Vernacularization on the ground: local uses of global women’s rights in Peru, China, India and the United States. Global Networks, 9(4), 441–61.Google Scholar
Loh, J. (2011). “Borrowing” religious identifications: a study of religious practices among the hijras of India. Polyvocia – The SOAS Journal of Graduate Research, 3, 50–67.Google Scholar
Lorway, R., Reza‐Paul, S., and Pasha, A. (2009) On becoming a male sex worker in Mysore: sexual subjectivity, “empowerment,” and community‐based HIV prevention research. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 23(2), 142–60.Google Scholar
Marriot, M. (1979). Hindu transactions: diversity without dualism. In Kapferer, B., ed., Transaction and Meaning: Directions in the Anthropology of Human Issues. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 109–42.Google Scholar
Mines, M. (1994). Public Faces, Private Voices: Community and Individuality in South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mokhtar, S. (2021). Mediating hijra in/visibility: the affective economy of value-coding marginality in South Asia. Feminist Media Studies, 21(6), 959–72.Google Scholar
Mookherjee, N. (2013). Introduction: self in South Asia. Journal of Historical Sociology, 26(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Moore, H. (2007). The Subject of Anthropology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moore, H. (2011). Still Life: Hopes, Desires and Satisfactions. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. (2012). Sexuality encore. In Aggleton, P., Boyce, P., Moore, H., and Parker, R., eds., Understanding Global Sexualities: New Frontiers. London: Routledge, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Nanda, S. (1990). Neither Man nor Woman: The Hijras of India. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Opler, M. E. (1960). The hijara (hermaphrodites) of India and Indian national character: a rejoinder. American Anthropologist, 62(3), 505–11.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (2008). Sexuality, culture and society: shifting paradigms in sexuality research. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11(3), 251–66.Google Scholar
Pigg, S. L. (2001). Languages of sex and AIDS in Nepal: notes on the social production of commensurability. Cultural Anthropology, 16(4), 481–54.Google Scholar
Pigg, S. L. (2005). Globalizing the facts of life. In Adams, V. and Leigh Pigg, S., eds., Sex in Development: Science, Sexuality and Morality in Global Perspective. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 39–66.Google Scholar
Posocco, S. (2020). Postplurality: an ethnographic tableau. In Boyce, P., Gonzalez-Polledo, EJ, and Posocco, S., eds., Queering Knowledge: Analytics, Devices and Investments after Marilyn Strathern. London: Routledge, pp. 131–47.Google Scholar
Preston, L. W. (1987). A right to exist: eunuchs and the state in nineteenth-century India. Modern Asian Studies, 21(2), 371–87.Google Scholar
Rao, R. (2020). Out of Time: The Queer Politics of Postcoloniality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, G. (2003). “Men” who would be kings: celibacy, emasculation, and the re-production of hijras in contemporary Indian politics. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 70(1), 163–200.Google Scholar
Reddy, G. (2005a). With Respect to Sex: Charting Hijra Identity in Hyderabad. India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, G. (2005b). Genealogies of contagion: Hijras, Kothis and the politics of sexual marginality in Hyderbad. Anthropology and Medicine, 12, 255–70.Google Scholar
Rorty, A. O. (2007). The vanishing subject: the many faces of subjectivity. In Biehl, J., Good, B., and Kleinman, A., eds., Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 191–209.Google Scholar
Rose, H. A. (1907). Muhammadan birth observances in the Punjab. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 37, 237–60.Google Scholar
Shah, A. M. (1961). A note on the Hijadas of Gujarat. American Anthropologist, 63(6), 1325–30.Google Scholar
Sharma, J. (2019). The politics of Hindutva and its erotic charge. https://kafila.online/2019/06/24/the-politics-of-hindutva-and-its-erotic-charge-jaya-sharma/.Google Scholar
Sharma, J. (2020). The yogi and the erotics of violence. https://kafila.online/2020/01/14/the-yogi-and-the-erotics-of-violence-jaya-sharma/.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. K. (1989). Hijras: The Labelled Deviants. New Delhi: Gian.Google Scholar
Spronk, R. (2012). Ambiguous Pleasures: Sexuality and Middle-Class Self Perceptions in Nairobi. New York: Berghahn Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1990). The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (2004). Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on Interdisciplinarity, Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge. Oxon: Sean Kingston Publishing.Google Scholar
Talwar, R. (1999). The Third Sex and Human Rights. New Delhi: Gyan Publishing House.Google Scholar
Taussig, M. (1993). Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Upadhyay, N. (2020). Hindu nation and its queers: caste, Islamophobia, and de/coloniality in India. Interventions, 22(4), 464–80.Google Scholar
Valentine, D. (2007). Imagining Transgender: An Ethnography of a Category. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Vance, C. S. (2009). Anthropology sexuality: a theoretical comment. In Robertson, J., ed., Same-Sex Cultures and Sexualities: An Anthropological Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. (1981). The Invention of Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. (2001). An Anthropology of the Subject: Holographic Worldview and Its Meaning and Significance for Anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Agard-Jones, V. (2013). Sovereign intimacies: scaling sexual politics in Martinique. Doctoral diss., New York University.Google Scholar
Ah-King, M., and Hayward, E. (2014). Toxic sexes perverting pollution and queering hormone disruption. O-Zone: A Journal of Object-Oriented Studies, 1, 1–12.Google Scholar
Alaimo, S. (2012). States of suspension: trans-corporeality at sea. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 19(3), 476–93.Google Scholar
Alaimo, S. (2015). Nature. In Disch, L. and Hawkesworth, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alaimo, S., and Hekman, S., eds. (2008). Material Feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bagemihl, B. (2000). Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity. New York: Stonewall Inn Editions.Google Scholar
Bailey, E. T. (2010). The Sound of the Wild Snail Eating. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–68.Google Scholar
Behar, K. (2016). Object-Oriented Feminism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Belcourt, B.-R. (2015). Animal bodies, colonial subjects: (re)locating animality in decolonial thought. Societies, 5(1), 1–11; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5010001.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
Chen, M. Y. (2011). Toxic animacies, inanimate affections. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 17(2), 265–86.Google Scholar
Chen, M. Y. (2012). Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–99.Google Scholar
Dave, N. N. (2014). Witness: humans, animals, and the politics of becoming. Cultural Anthropology, 29(3), 433–56.Google Scholar
Davis, A. (1981). Women, Race and Class. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Deloria, V., Jr. (2001). American Indian metaphysics. In Deloria, V. Jr. and Wildcat, D. R., eds., Power and Place: Indian Education in America. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
di Chiro, G. (2010). Polluted politics? Confronting toxic discourse, sex panic, and eco-normativity. In Mortimer-Sandilands, C. and Erickson, B., eds., Queer Ecologies: Sex, Nature, Politics and Desire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Few, M., and Tortorici, Z., eds. (2013). Centering Animals in Latin American History: Writing Animals into Latin American History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gaard, G. C. (2013). Toward a feminist postcolonial milk studies. American Quarterly, 65(3), 595–618.Google Scholar
García, M. E. (2010). Super guinea pigs? Anthropology Now, 2(2), 22–32.Google Scholar
García, M. E. (2019). Death of a guinea pig: grief and the limits of multispecies ethnography in Peru. Environmental Humanities, 11(2), 351–72.Google Scholar
Giffney, N., and Hird, M. J. (2008). Queering the Non/Human. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gillespie, K. (2014). Sexualized violence and the gendered commodification of the animal body in Pacific Northwest US dairy production. Gender, Place and Culture, 21(10), 1321–37.Google Scholar
Gillespie, K. (2016). Witnessing animal others: bearing witness, grief, and the political function of emotion. Hypatia, 31(3), 572–88.Google Scholar
Gillespie, K. (2018). The Cow with Ear Tag #1389. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Govindrajan, R. (2018). Interspecies Relatedness in India’s Central Himalayas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halberstam, J. (2011). The Queer Art of Failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (1985). Manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65–108.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (2008). When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
Hayward, E. (2008). More lessons from a starfish: prefixial flesh and transspeciated selves. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 36(3–4), 64–85.Google Scholar
Hayward, E. (2010). Fingeryeyes: impressions of cup corals. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 577–99.Google Scholar
Hird, M. J. (2006). Animal transex. Australian Feminist Studies, 21(49), 35–50.Google Scholar
Jackson, Z. I. (2020). Becoming Human: Matter and Meaning in an Antiblack World. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, H. A. (1973). Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Kier, B. (2010). Interdependent ecological transsex: notes on re/production, “transgender” fish, and the management of populations, species, and resources. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, 20(3), 299–319.Google Scholar
Kim, C. J. (2015). Dangerous Crossings: Race, Species, and Nature in a Multicultural Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirksey, E., ed. (2014). The Multispecies Salon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
Kirksey, E. (2015). Emergent Ecologies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
Kirksey, E., and Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–76. https://anthropology.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/helmreich_multispecies_ethnography.pdf.Google Scholar
Kirksey, E., and Helmreich, S. (2012). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–76.Google Scholar
Kirksey, E., Schuetze, C., and Helmreich, S. (2014). Introduction: tactics of multispecies ethnography. In Kirksey, E., ed., The Multispecies Salon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Ko, A., and Ko, S. (2017). Aphro-Ism: Essays on Pop Culture, Feminism, and Black Veganism from Two Sisters. New York: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kopnina, H. (2017). Beyond multispecies ethnography: engaging with violence and animal rights in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 37(3), 333–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, R. Y., and O’Laughlin, L. N. (2018). Undoing Monogamy: The Politics of Science and the Possibilities of Biology by Angela Willey; Exposed: Environmental Politics and Pleasures in Posthuman Times by Stacy Alaimo; Object-Oriented Feminism edited by Katherine Behar. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(4), 1034–40.Google Scholar
Livingston, J., and Puar, J. (2011). Interspecies. Social Text, 29(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
Lowe, L. (2006). The intimacies of four continents. In Stoler, A., ed., Haunted by Empire: Geographies of Intimacy in North American History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luciano, D., and Chen, M. Y. (2015). Has the queer ever been human? GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2–3), 183–207.Google Scholar
Mortimer-Sandilands, C., and Erickson, B. (2010). Introduction: a genealogy of queer ecologies. In Mortimer-Sandilands, C. and Erickson, B., eds., Queer Ecologies: Sex, Nature, Politics, Desire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Noske, B. (1989). Humans and Other Animals: Beyond the Boundaries of Anthropology. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Noske, B. (1993). The animal question in anthropology: a commentary. Society and Animals, 1(2), 185–90.Google Scholar
Ogden, L. A., Hall, B., and Tanita, K. (2013). Animals, plants, people, and things: a review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and Society, 4(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
O’Laughlin, L. (2015). Rethinking Temporalities of Endocrine Disruptor Panics: Anxious Time and Evolutionary Time as Multispecies Intimacy. MA thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Parreñas, J. S. (2018). Decolonizing Extinction: The Work of Care in Orangutan Rehabilitation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, H. (2011). Release the moths: critical animal studies and the posthumanist impulse. Culture, Theory and Critique, 52(1), 65–81.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. (1997). Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Rose, D. B., and Van Dooren, T. (2011). Unloved others: death of the disregarded in the time of extinctions. Australian Humanities Review, 50, 1–4.Google Scholar
Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J., and Pratt, S. L. (2020). The new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3–4), 331–46.Google Scholar
Roughgarden, J. (2009). The Genial Gene: Deconstructing Darwinian Selfishness. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sheldon, R. (2015). Form/matter/chora: object oriented ontology and feminist new materialism. In Grusin, R., ed., The Nonhuman Turn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 193–222.Google Scholar
Spillers, H. J. (1987). Mama’s baby, Papa’s maybe: an American grammar Book. Diacritics, 17(2), 65–81.Google Scholar
Steinbock, E., Szczygielska, M., and Wagner, A. (2017). Thinking linking. Angelaki (special issue Tranimacies: Intimate Links between Animal and Trans Studies), 22(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, N. (2010). Penguin family values: the nature of planetary environmental justice. In Mortimer-Sandilands, C. and Erickson, B., eds., Queer Ecologies: Sex, Nature, Politics, Desire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 102–33.Google Scholar
Subramanian, B. (2014). Ghost Stories for Darwin: The Science of Variation and the Politics of Diversity. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
TallBear, K. (2011). Why interspecies thinking needs indigenous standpoints. Fieldsights, April 24. https://culanth.org/eldsights/why-interspecies-thinking-needs-indigenous-standpoints.Google Scholar
TallBear, K. (2013). Native American DNA Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
TallBear, K. (2017). Beyond the life/not-life binary: a feminist-indigenous reading of cryopreservation, interspecies thinking, and the new materialisms. In Radin, J. and Kowal, E., eds., Cryopolitics: Frozen Life in a Melting World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 179–202.Google Scholar
Taylor, N., and Hamilton, L. (2017). Ethnography after Humanism: Power, Politics and Method in Multi-Species Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Terry, J. (2000). “Unnatural acts” in nature: the scientific fascination with queer animals. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 6(2), 151–93.Google Scholar
Tompkins, K. W. (2016). On the limits and promise of new materialist philosophy. Lateral, https://csalateral.org/issue/5-1/forum-alt-humanities-new-materialist-philosophy-tompkins/ (Last accessed 29 June 2023).Google Scholar
Trotter, B. (2018). Pound owner who sedates lobster with marijuana to continue despite concerns raised by state, PETA. Bangor Daily News. September 21. http://bangordailynews.com/2018/09/21/news/hancock/animal-rights-group-downplays-effects-of-marijuana-on-lobsters-before-boiling/.Google Scholar
Tsing, A. L. (2015). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, E. (2014). A turn to where we already were? Settler inquiry, indigenous philosophy, and the ontological turn. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Tuck, E., and McKenzie, M. (2015). Place in Research: Theory, Methodology, and Methods. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Uexküll, J. von. (2010). A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning. Trans. Joseph D. O’Neil. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2014). Cannibal Metaphysics. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.Google Scholar
WEA and NYSHN. (2016). Violence on the Land, Violence on Our Bodies: Building an Indigenous Response to Environmental Violence. Women’s Earth Alliance and Native Youth Sexual Health Network. Available at http://landbodydefense.org/uploads/files/VLVBReportToolkit2016.pdf (accessed October 15, 2021).Google Scholar
Weaver, H. (2013). “Becoming in kind”: race, class, gender, and nation in cultures of dog rescue and dogfighting. American Quarterly, 65(3), 689–709.Google Scholar
Weaver, H. (2015). Pit bull promises: inhuman intimacies and queer kinships in an animal shelter. GLQ, 21(2–3), 343–63.Google Scholar
Weheliye, A. G. (2014). Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, J., and Hayward, E., eds. (2015). Tranimalities, special issue of TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2(2). https://read.dukeupress.edu/tsq/issue/2/2Google Scholar
Willey, A. (2016). Undoing Monogamy: The Politics of Science and the Possibilities of Biology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
Woelfle-Erskine, C., and Cole, J. (2015). Transfiguring the Anthropocene: stochastic reimaginings of human-beaver worlds. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2(2), 297–316.Google Scholar
Wynter, S. (1994). “No humans involved”: an open letter to my colleagues. Forum N.H.I.: Knowledge for the 21st Century, 1(1), 42–73.Google Scholar
Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation – an argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337.Google Scholar

References

Albert, B. (1985). Temps du sang. Temps des cendres. Représentacions de la maladie, système ritual e espace politique chez les Yanomami du sud est (Amazonie Brésilienne). PhD thesis, Université de Paris X.Google Scholar
Alexiades, M., and Peluso, D. (2016). La urbanizacion indigena en la Amazonia: un nuevo contexto de articulación social y territorial. Gazeta de Antropología, 32(1). http://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/42869 (accessed December 1, 2020).Google Scholar
Allard, O. (2014). Indigenous peoples and gender identities: questioning sexual dualism. Revista Sexología y Sociedad, online journal, 19(1). https://revsexologiaysociedad.sld.cu/index.php/sexologiaysociedad/article/view/237/298 (accessed December 1, 2020).Google Scholar
Århem, K., Cayón, L., Angulo, G., and García, M. (2004). Etnografía Makuna: tradiciones, relatos y saberes de la gente del agua. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Bacigalupo, A. M. (2004). The Mapuche man who became a woman shaman: selfhood, gender transgression, and competing cultural norms. American Ethnologist, 31(3), 440–57.Google Scholar
Bamberger, J. (1974). The myth of matriarchy: why men rule in primitive society. In Rosaldo, M. Z. and Lamphere, L., eds., Women, Culture and Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 262–80.Google Scholar
Baniwa, B. (2018). Mulheres e território: reflexão sobre o que afeta a vida das mulheres indígenas quando os direitos territoriais são ameaçados. Vukápanavo: Revista Terena, 1(1), 165–70.Google Scholar
Barboza, M., Tukano, L., and Waiwai, J. (2019). Corpoterritorialização Katukina: lampejos etnográficos sob as perspectivas femininas indígenas. Amazônica – Revista de Antropología, 11(2), 503–47.Google Scholar
Beckerman, S., and Valentine, P., eds. (2002). Cultures of Multiple Fathers: The Theory and Practice of Partible Paternity in South America. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute.Google Scholar
Belaunde, L. E. (2000). Women’s strength: unassisted birth amongst the Piro of Amazonian Peru. Jaso, 31(1): 31–43.Google Scholar
Belaunde, L. E. (2005). El recuerdo de luna: género, sangre y memoria entre los pueblos amazónicos. Lima: Universidad Mayor de San Marcos.Google Scholar
Belaunde, L. E. (2006). The strength of thoughts, the stench of blood: Amazonian hematology and gender. Tipiti, 4 (1–2), 129–52.Google Scholar
Belaunde, L. E. (2015). Resguardo e sexualidade(s): uma antropologia simétrica das sexualidades amazônicas em transformação. Cadernos de Campo. São Paulo, 24, 538–64.Google Scholar
Belaunde, L. E. (2018a). Sexualidades amazónicas: género, deseos y alteridades. Lima: La Siniestra Ensayos.Google Scholar
Belaunde, L. E. (2018b). Impactos de la explotación de hidrocarburos sobre las mujeres de los pueblos indígenas de la Amazonía peruana. In Chirif, A., ed., Deforestación en tiempos de cambio climático. Lima: IGWIA, pp. 179–94.Google Scholar
Belaunde, L. E. (2019a). O ninho do japu: gênero e relações interespécies airo pai. Amazônica – Revista de Antropologia, 11(2), 657–87.Google Scholar
Belaunde, L. E. (2019b). La deforestación en el mosaico de los cambios que afectan las relaciones de género entre los pueblos amazónicos. In Silva Santiesteban, R., ed., Mujeres indígenas frente al cambio climático. Lima: IWGIA, pp. 91–124.Google Scholar
Benites, S. (2018). Viver na língua Guarani Nhandeva (mulher falando). Master’s dissertation. PPGAS, Museu Nacional.Google Scholar
Brown, M. (1985). Tsewa’s Gift: Magic and Meaning in an Amazonian Society. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calheiros, O. (2015). O próprio do desejo: a emergência da diferença extensiva entre os viventes (Aikewara, Pará). Cadernos de Campo. São Paulo, 24 (24), 487–504.Google Scholar
Cancela, C. D., Silveira, F. L. A. da, and Machado, A. (2010). Caminhos de uma pesquisa acerca da sexualidade em aldeias indígenas no Mato Grosso do Sul. Revista de Antropologia, 53(1), 199–235.Google Scholar
Cariaga, D. (2015). Gênero e sexualidades indígenas, alguns aspetos das transformações nas relações a partir dos kaiowá em Mato Grosso do Sul. Cadernos de Campo. São Paulo, 24(24), 441–64.Google Scholar
Caux, C. (2015). O riso indiscreto: couvade e apertura corporal entre os Araweté. Doctoral thesis. Rio de Janeiro. Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Clastres, P. (1987 [1974]). The bow and the basket. In Society against the State: Essays in Political Anthropology. New York: Zone Books, pp. 101–28.Google Scholar
Coimbra, C., and Garnelo, L. (2003). Questões de saúde reprodutiva da mulher indígena no Brasil. Documento de trabalho 7. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz.Google Scholar
Colpron, A. M. (2005). Monopólio masculino do xamanismo amazônico?: o contra-exemplo das mulheres xamã shipibo-conibo. Mana, 11(1), 95–128.Google Scholar
Conklin, B. (2001). Women’s blood, warrior’s blood and the conquest of vitality in Amazonia. In Gregor, T. and Tuzin, D., eds., Gender in Amazonia and Melanesia: An Exploration of the Comparative Method. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 141–74.Google Scholar
Cova, V. (2018) Nicole, reina de Macas: el impacto del trabajo asalariado sobre el activismo trans en la Amazonia ecuatoriana. Revista Latinoamericana de Antropología del Trabajo, 4, 1–25.Google Scholar
Crocker, W., and Crocker, J. (2004). The Canela: Kinship, Ritual and Sex in an Amazonian Tribe. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Dainese, G., and Seraguza, L. (2016). Sobre géneros, arte, sexualidade e a falibilidade de esses e outros conceitos: entrevista com Luisa Elvira Belaunde Olschewski. Ñanduty, 4(5), 286–307.Google Scholar
De la Cadena, M. (2015). Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
De la Cadena, M. (2018). Natureza incomum: histórias do antropo-cego. Revista do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros, 69, 95–117.Google Scholar
Descola, P. (2001). The genres of gender: local models of global paradigms in the comparison of Amazonia and Melanesia. In Gregor, T. and Tuzin, D., eds., Gender in Amazonia and Melanesia: An Exploration of the Comparative Method. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 91–114.Google Scholar
Duarte, N. (2017). Nukê mevîsh shovia awe (saber-fazer das mãos entre os Marubo do rio Curuça). Master’s dissertation. PPGAS/MN/UFRJ.Google Scholar
Dziubinska, M. (2017). Devenir reine kakataibo: performance, séduction et genre en Amazonie péruvienne. Journal de la Société des Américanistes, 103(1), 51–83.Google Scholar
Fausto, C. (2001). Inimigos fiéis: historia, guerra e xamanismo na Amazônia. São Paulo: EDUSP.Google Scholar
Fernandes, E. R. (2017). Ser índio e ser gay: tecendo uma tese sobre homossexualidade indígena no Brasil. Etnográfica, 21(3), 639–47.Google Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna. (1996). Mulheres entre os Kuikuro. Revista de Estudos Feministas, 1, 35–54.Google Scholar
Galli, E. (2002). Migrar transformándose: género y experiencias oníricas entre los Runa de la Amazonía Ecuatoriana. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, M. A. (2001). O mundo inacabado: ação e criação em uma cosmología amazônica. Etnografia Pirahã. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.Google Scholar
Gow, P. (1989). The perverse child: desire in a native Amazonian subsistence economy. Man (JRAI), 24(4), 567–82.Google Scholar
Gow, P. (1991). Of Mixed Blood: Kinship and History in the Peruvian Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregor, T. (1985). Anxious Pleasures: The Sexual Lives of an Amazonian People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guss, D. (1989). To Weave and Sing: Art, Symbol, and Narrative in the South American Rainforest. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Guzmán, M. A. (1997). Para que la yuca beba nuestra sangre: trabajo, género y parentesco en una comunidad Quichua de la Amazonía Ecuatoriana. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Héritier-Augé, F. (1991). La sangre de los guerreros y la sangre de las mujeres. Alteridades, 1(2), 92–102.Google Scholar
High, C. 2010. Warriors, hunters, and Bruce Lee: gendered agency and the transformation of Amazonian masculinity. American Ethnologist, 3(4), 753–70.Google Scholar
Holbraad, M., and Pedersen, M. A. (2017). The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hugh-Jones, C. (1979). From the Milk River: Spatial and Temporal Processes in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hugh-Jones, S. (2001). The gender of some Amazonian gifts: an experiment with an experiment. In Gregor, T. and Tuzin, D., eds., Gender in Amazonia and Melanesia: An Exploration of the Comparative Method. Berkleley: University of California Press, pp. 245–77.Google Scholar
Kensinger, K. (1997). Cambio de perspectivas sobre las relaciones de género. In Perrin, M. and Perruchon, M. eds., Complementariedad entre hombre y mujer: relaciones de género desde la perspectiva Amerindia. Quito: Abya-Yala, pp. 109–24.Google Scholar
Korap Munduruku, A., and Azevedo Chavez, K. (2020). “Precisamos estar vivos para seguir na luta”: pandemia e a luta das mulheres Munduruku. Mundo Amazónico, 11(2), 179–200.Google Scholar
Lagrou, E. (2007). A fluidez da forma: arte e alteridade entre os Kaxinawa. Río de Janeiro: Top Books.Google Scholar
Langdon, J. (1982). Ideology of the north west Amazon: cosmology, ritual and daily life. Reviews in Anthropology, 9(4), 349–59.Google Scholar
Lea, V. (1994). Gênero feminino Mebengokre (Kayapó): desvelando representações desgastadas. Cadernos Pagu, 3, 85–115.Google Scholar
Leacock, E. B. (1981). Myths of Male Domination: Collected Articles on Women Cross-Culturally. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. (1955). Tristes tropiques. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Lima, T. S. (1999). The two and its many: reflections on perspectivism in a Tupi cosmology. Ethnos, 64(1), 107–31.Google Scholar
Lima, T. S. (2005). Um peixe olhou pra mim: os Yudjá e a perspectiva. São Paulo: ISA/UNESP.Google Scholar
Madi Dias, D. (2018). O parentesco transviado, exemplo Guna. Sexualidad, Salud, Sociedad, 29, 25–51.Google Scholar
Magnani, C. (2018). Ũn Ka’ok – mulheres fortes: uma etnografia das práticas e saberes extraordinários das mulheres Tikmũ’ũn – Maxakali. Doctoral thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Mahecha Rubio, D. (2015). Masa Goro: la crianza de personas verdaderas entre los Macuna del Bajo Apaporis. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
Marcha das Mulheres. (2019). Documento final da marcha das mulheres, território, nosso corpo, nosso espírito. https://trabalhoindigenista.org.br/documento-final-marcha-das-mulheres-indigenas-territorio-nosso-corpo-nosso-espirito/ (accessed December 1, 2020).Google Scholar
Matos, B. de A. (2019). O perigo do olhar da mulher: reflexões sobre gênero e perspectiva a partir de um ritual de iniciação masculina Matses. Amazônica: Revista de Antropologia (Online), 11(2), 637–56.Google Scholar
Matos, B. de A., Otero dos Santos, J., and Belaunde, L. E. (2019). Corpo, terra, perspectiva: o gênero e suas transformações na etnologia. Amazônica – Revista de Antropologia, [S.l.], 11(2), 391–412. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18542/amazonica.v11i2.7957 (accessed December 1, 2020).Google Scholar
McCallum, C. (2001). Gender and Sociality in Amazonia: How Real People Are Made. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Murphy, Y., and Murphy, R. (1974). Women of the Forest. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nieto, V., and Langdon, J. (2018). Narrativas de violencia y transformación de mujeres indígenas Uitoto en Bogotá. Revista sobre Acceso a Justiça e Direitos nas Américas, 2(2), 140–77.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. (1974). Is female to male as nature is to culture? In Rosaldo, M. Z. and Lamphere, L., eds., Woman, Culture and Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 67–87.Google Scholar
Otero dos Santos, J. (2019). Sobre mulheres brabas: ritual, gênero e perspectiva. Amazônica: Revista de Antropologia (Online), 11(2), 607–35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18542/amazonica.v11i2.7643 (accessed December 1, 2020).Google Scholar
Overing, J. (1984). Dualisms as expressions of difference and danger: marriage and reciprocity among the Piaroa of Venezuela. In Kensinger, K., ed., Marriage Practices in Lowland South America. Urbana: University of Illinois, pp. 127–55.Google Scholar
Overing, J. (1986). Men control women? The “catch 22” in the analysis of gender. International Journal of Moral and Social Studies, 1(2), 135–56.Google Scholar
Overing, J. (1989). Styles of manhood: an Amazonian contrast in tranquillity and violence. In Howell, S. and Willis, R., eds., Societies at Peace: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 79–99.Google Scholar
Overing Kaplan, J. (1981). Amazonian anthropology. Journal of Latin American Studies, 13(1), 151–64.Google Scholar
Panet, R.-F. (2010) “I mã a kupên prâm!”: prazer e sexualidade entre os Canela. Doctoral thesis, Universidade Federal do Maranhão.Google Scholar
Reichel-Dolmatoff, G. (1997). Rainforest Shamans: Essays on the Tukano Indians of the Northwest Amazon. London: Themis Books.Google Scholar
Rifkin, M. (2011). When Did Indians Become Straight? Kinship, the History of Sexuality, and Native Sovereignty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rival, L. (2012). Animism and the meanings of life: reflections from Amazonia. In Brightman, M., Grotti, V. E., and Ulturgasheva, O., eds., Animism in Rainforest and Tundra: Personhood, Animals, Plants and Things in Contemporary Amazonia and Siberia. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 69–81.Google Scholar
Rodgers, D. (2002). A soma anômala: a questão do suplemento no xamanismo e menstruação ikpeng. Mana, 8(2), 91–125.Google Scholar
Rosa, P. C. (2019). Sobre as diferentes formas de habitar as normas e ativar modulações no parentesco: um caso ticuna. Amazônica – Revista de Antropologia, [S.l.], 11(2), 711–38. In https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/amazonica/article/view/7497 (accessed December 1, 2020).Google Scholar
Rosalen, J. (2015). Explorando alguns temas relacionados à sexualidade junto aos wayampi. Cadernos de Campos, 24(24), 524–37.Google Scholar
Santos, M. (2019). Sinzhi warmiguna: notas sobre política e gênero entre as/os Sarayaku Runa. Amazônica – Revista de Antropología, 11(2), 467–501.Google Scholar
Scopel, R. (2014). A cosmopolítica da gestação, parto e pós-parto: práticas de autoatenção e processo de medicalização entre os índios Munduruku. Doctoral thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.Google Scholar
Seeger, A., Da Matta, R., and Viveiros de Castro, E. (2019 [1979]). The construction of the person in indigenous Brazilian societies. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 9(3), 694–703.Google Scholar
Siskind, J. (1973). To Hunt in the Morning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soares, A. M. (2019). Sangue menstrual na sociedade Karipuna do Amapá, Brasil. Amazônica – Revista de Antropologia, 11(2), 413–33.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1988). The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Surrallés, A. (2009). En el corazón del sentido: percepción, afectividad y acción en los Candoshi, Alta Amazonía. Lima: IFEA.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. C. (2001). Wives, pets and affines: marriage among the Jívaro. In Rival, L. and Whitehead, N., eds., The Visible and the Material: The Amerindianization of Society in the Work of Peter Rivière. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 45–56.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. (1982). Order without Government: The Society of the Pemon Indians of Venezuela. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Tikuna, J., and Picq, M. (2016). Queering Amazonia: homo-affective relations among Tikuna society. In Aguirre, M., Garzon, A. M., Viteri, M.A., and Picq, M. L., eds., Queering Paradigms V: Queering Narratives of Modernity. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 113–34.Google Scholar
Tota, M. (2013). Entre as diferenças: gênero, geração e sexualidades em contexto interétnico. Rio de Janeiro: Multifoco.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, P., and Valera, A. (2005). Koshi Shinanya Ainbo: el testimonio de una mujer Shipiba. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.Google Scholar
Virtanen, P. C. (2012). Indigenous Youth in Brazilian Amazonia: Changing Lived Worlds. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (1977). Indivíduo e sociedade no Alto Xingu: os Yawalapiti. Master’s dissertation, PPGAS, Museu Nacional.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (1979). A fabricação do corpo na sociedade Xinguana. Boletim do Museu Nacional (N.S.), 32, 2–19.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (1996). Images of nature and society in Amazonian ethnology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25(1), 179–200.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998). Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469–88.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2002). A imanência do inimigo. In A inconstância da alma selvagem. São Paulo: Cosac Naify, pp. 265–94.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2003). After-dinner speech at “Anthropology and Science.” Manchester Papers in Social Anthropology, 7. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Xakriabá, C. C. (2018). O barro, o jenipapo e o giz no fazer epistemológico de autoria Xacriabá: reativação da memória por uma educação territorializada. Master’s dissertation, PPGAS, Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Bear, L. (2017). Anthropological futures: for a critical political economy of capitalist time. Social Anthropology, 25(2), 142–58.Google Scholar
Bell, D., Holliday, R., Jones, M., Probyn, E., and Taylor, J. S. (2011). Bikinis and bandages: an itinerary for cosmetic surgery tourism. Tourist Studies, 11(2), 139–55.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, D. (2017). Botox Nation: Changing the Face of America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Brownell, S. (2005). China reconstructs: cosmetic surgery and nationalism in the reform era. In Alter, J., ed., Asian Medicine and Globalization. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 132–50.Google Scholar
Caldeira, T. P. d. R. (2000). City of Walls: Crime, Segregation and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, S. (2015). The rise and fall of French “anthropology at home.” In Chevalier, S., ed., Anthropology at the Crossroads: The View from France. Canon Pyon: Sean Kingston Publishing.Google Scholar
Chevalier, S., Edwards, J., and Macdonald, S. (2007). L’anthropologie de la Grande-Bretagne: une discipline en plein essor. Ethnologie Française: L’anthropologie de la Grande-Bretagne 37(2), 197–213.Google Scholar
Craig, M. L. (2006). Race, beauty, and the tangled knot of a guilty pleasure. Feminist Theory, 7(2), 159–77.Google Scholar
DoH (Department of Health). (2013). Review of the regulation of cosmetic intervention. www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-the-regulation-of-cosmetic-interventions (accessed October 27, 2020).Google Scholar
Dumit, J. (2012). Drugs for Life: How Pharmaceutical Companies Define Our Health. Durham, NC: Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, A. (2010). Pretty Modern: Beauty, Sex, and Plastic Surgery in Brazil. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (2000). Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (n.d.). “Maybe we have left them behind”: Brexit, ambivalence and contradiction. www.brexitfutures.co.uk/articles.Google Scholar
Edwards, J., Haugerud, A., and Parikh, S. (2017). Brexit, Trump, and anthropology: forum. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 195–248.Google Scholar
Figueroa, M. G. M. (2013). Displaced looks: the lived experience of beauty and racism. Feminist Theory, 14(2), 137–51. doi:10.1177/1464700113483241Google Scholar
Gilman, S. L. (1999). Making the Body Beautiful: A Cultural History of Aesthetic Surgery. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Greco, C. (2015). The Poly Implant Prothèse breast prostheses scandal: embodied risk and social suffering. Social Science & Medicine, 147, 150–7.Google Scholar
Green, S., Gregory, C., Reeves, M. et al. (2016). Brexit referendum: first reactions from anthropology. Social Anthropology, 24, 478–502. doi: 10.1111/1469-8676.12331.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hastrup, K., and Elsass, P. (1990). Anthropological advocacy: a contradiction in terms? Current Anthropology, 31(3), 301–11.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. J. (2009). All cosmetic surgery is “ethnic”: Asian eyelids, feminist indignation, and the politics of whiteness. In Heyes, C. J. and Jones, M., eds., Cosmetic Surgery: A Feminist Primer. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Holliday, R., and Elfving-Hwang, J. (2012). Gender, globalization and aesthetic surgery in South Korea. Body and Society, 18(2), 58–81.Google Scholar
Houtman, G. (1988). Interview with Maurice Bloch. Anthropology Today, 4(1), 18–21.Google Scholar
Jabbari, B. (2018). Botulinum Toxin Treatment: What Everybody Should Know. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Jackson, A., ed. (1987). Anthropology at Home. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Jarrín, A. (2017). The Biopolitics of Beauty: Cosmetic Citizenship and Affective Capital in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kaw, E. (1993). Medicalization of racial features: Asian American women and cosmetic surgery. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 7(1), 74–89.Google Scholar
Kaw, E. (1997). Opening faces: the politics of cosmetic surgery and Asian American women. In Crawford, M. and Unger, R. K., eds., In Our Own Words: Readings on the Psychology of Women and Gender. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 55–73.Google Scholar
Kierans, C., and Bell, K. (2017). Cultivating ambivalence: some methodological considerations for anthropology. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7(2), 23–44.Google Scholar
Knight, D. M. (2017). Anxiety and cosmopolitan futures: Brexit and Scotland. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 237–42.Google Scholar
Koch, I. L. (2018). Personalizing the State: An Anthropology of Law, Politics, and Welfare in Austerity Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lamphere, L. (2016). Feminist anthropology engages social movements: theory, ethnography and activism. In Lewin, E. and Silverstein, L. M., eds., Mapping Feminist Anthropology in the Twenty-First Century. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 41–65.Google Scholar
Lee, T., Choi, H., Lee, Y., and Lee, Y. (1994). Paraffinoma of the penis. Yonsei Medical Journal, 35(3), 344–8.Google Scholar
Lenehan, S. (2011). Nose aesthetics: rhinoplasty and identity in Tehran. Anthropology of the Middle East, 6(1), 47–62.Google Scholar
Lewin, E., and Silverstein, L., eds. (2016). Mapping Feminist Anthropology in the Twenty-First Century. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Lima, A. d. S. (2004). Anthropology and indigenous people in Brazil: ethical engagement and social intervention. Practicing Anthropology, 26(3), 11–15.Google Scholar
Liu, L., Liu, Y., Li, J., Du, G., & Chen, J. (2011). Microbial production of hyaluronic acid: current state, challenges, and perspectives. Microbial cell factories, 10, 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-10-99Google Scholar
Lutz, C. (1990). The erasure of women’s writing in sociocultural anthropology. American Ethnologist, 17(4), 611–27.Google Scholar
McClaurin, I., ed. (2001). Black Feminist Anthropology: Theory, Politics, Praxis, and Poetics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Messerschmidt, D. A., ed. (1981). Anthropologists at Home in North America: Methods and Issues in the Study of One’s Own Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Minh-Ha, T. T. (2009). Woman, Native, Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, C. T., Russo, A., and Torres, L., eds. (1991). Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mohr, S. (2016). Just an anthropologist? An interview with Esther Newton. Member Voices, Fieldsights, December 7. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/series/just-an-anthropologist-an-interview-with-esther-newton.Google Scholar
Monheit, G. D., and Pickett, A. (2017). AbobotulinumtoxinA: a 25-year history. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 37(suppl. 1), S4–S11.Google Scholar
Narayan, K. (1993). How native is a “native” anthropologist? American Anthropologist, 95(3), 671–86.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. M. (2001). Stumped identities: body image, bodies politic, and the mujer Maya as prosthetic. Cultural Anthropology, 16(3), 314–53.Google Scholar
Newton, E. (1972). Mother Camp: Female Impersonators in America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
NCoB (Nuffield Council on Bioethics). (2017). Cosmetic procedures: ethical issues. www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/cosmetic-procedures (accessed November 3, 2020).Google Scholar
Ochoa, M. (2014). Queen for a Day: Transformistas, Beauty Queens, and the Performance of Femininity in Venezuela. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Okely, J. (1983). The Traveller-Gypsies. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Peirano, M. G. S. (1998). When anthropology is at home: the different contexts of a single discipline. Annual Review Anthropology, 27, 105–28.Google Scholar
Plemons, E. (2017). The Look of a Woman: Facial Feminization Surgery and the Aims of Trans-Medicine. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Popenoe, R. (2004). Feeding Desire: Fatness and Beauty in the Sahara. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rapport, N. (2002). British Subjects: An Anthropology of Britain. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, G. L. (2014). Brazilian anthropology away from home. American Anthropologist, 116(1), 165–9.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, G. L., and Escobar, A. (2006). World Anthropologies: Disciplinary Transformations in Systems of Power. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Rosa, J., and Bonilla, Y. (2017). Deprovincializing Trump, decolonizing diversity, and unsettling anthropology. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 201–8.Google Scholar
Saberwal, S. (1982). Uncertain transplants: anthropology and sociology in India. Ethnos, 47(1–2), 36–49.Google Scholar
Sanabria, E. (2011). The body inside out: menstrual management and gynecological practice in Brazil. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, 55(1), 94–112.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N. (1995). The primacy of the ethical: propositions for a militant anthropology. Current Anthropology, 36(3), 409–40.Google Scholar
Schildkrout, E. (2004). Inscribing the body. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 319–44.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N. (1952). Religion and Society among the Coorgs of Southern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stack, C. B. (1997). All Our Kin. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Stafford, C. (2018). Moral judgement close to home. Social Anthropology 26(1), 117–29.Google Scholar
Strathern, A., and Strathern, M. (1971). Self-Decoration in Mount Hagen. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1987). An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology. Signs, 12(2), 276–92.Google Scholar
Turner, T. S. (1980). The social skin. In Cherfas, J. and Lewin, R., eds., Not Work Alone: A Cross-Cultural View of Activities Superfluous to Survival. London: Temple Smith. pp. 112–40. (Reprinted in HAU 2(2), 486–504.)Google Scholar
Visweswaran, K. (1997). Histories of feminist anthropology. Annual Review Anthropology, 26, 591–621.Google Scholar
Wise, J. (2023). Government delays regulation for non-surgical cosmetic procedures. BMJ, 380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p277.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Desires and Relations
  • Edited by Cecilia McCallum, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil, Silvia Posocco, Birkbeck College, University of London, Martin Fotta, Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality
  • Online publication: 29 September 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647410.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Desires and Relations
  • Edited by Cecilia McCallum, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil, Silvia Posocco, Birkbeck College, University of London, Martin Fotta, Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality
  • Online publication: 29 September 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647410.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Desires and Relations
  • Edited by Cecilia McCallum, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil, Silvia Posocco, Birkbeck College, University of London, Martin Fotta, Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality
  • Online publication: 29 September 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647410.021
Available formats
×