Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:49:47.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part XXII - Production History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2019

Bruce R. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Katherine Rowe
Affiliation:
Smith College, Massachusetts
Ton Hoenselaars
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Akiko Kusunoki
Affiliation:
Tokyo Woman’s Christian University, Japan
Andrew Murphy
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
Aimara da Cunha Resende
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil
Get access

Keywords

dramatis personaeoverplayingperiodspersonapersonationpersonsplacesplayingplaysprocessesproductionspublicstheories of actingunderplayingBetterton, ThomasBurbage, RichardCurtain (playhouse)Derring, Sir EdwardFalstaffHenry IV, Part OneKemp, WillQuin, Jamesthe Theatre (playhouse)Swan (playhouse)The Wits, or Sport upon SportBooth, Junius BrutuscharacterizationGarrick, DavidKeane, EdmundKemble, John PhilipKing LearMacready, William CharlesRestorationsceneryTate, NahumWren, ChristopherBetterton, ThomasBooth, EdwinGarrick, DavidHamletHazlitt, CharlesIrving, HenryKemble, John PhilipRestorationTaylor, JosephWilks, RobertCalvert, CharlesHarfleur, siege ofHenry VKean, CharlesJames, HenryMacready, William CharlesVictorianCovent Gardencross-dressingCushman, CharlotteFaucit, HelenaKemble, FannyO’Neill, ElizaMacready, William CharlesRomeo and JulietTree, EllenVictorianBrook, PeterCiulei, LiviucubismGuthrie TheaterMiller, JonathanThe TempestProsperoRedgrave, MichaelStratfordWebster, MargaretBranagh, KennethBrook, PeterFelliniHopkins, AnthonyJapaneseMussoliniRiefenstahl, LeniRoyal Shakespeare TheaterTaymor, JulieTitus Andronicusalternative sexualitiescostumingdominatrixhistorical periodKatherina1950sStuttgart BalletTaming of the ShrewUllman, Tracyviolenceaudience involvementBrecht, BertoltcorruptionHall, PeterJulius CaesarmurderpoliticalpoliticianstyrantviolenceBeatriceBranagh, KennethCheek by JowlDench, JudifilmMuch Ado About NothingRylance, MarkRoyal Shakespeare Company (RSC)woman director(s)Joe MacBethKurosawa, AkiraLady MacbethMacbethMifune, TashiroNinagawa, YukioPolanski, RomantelevisionTynan, KennethWelles, OrsonfilmFreud, SigmundJack the RipperMeasure for MeasurePinter, HaroldheterosexualhomosexualtelevisionTVVienna
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sources cited

Adams, John Cranford. The Globe Playhouse: Its Design and Equipment. 2nd ed. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1961.Google Scholar
Awasthi, Suresh. “The Intercultural Experience of the Kathakali ‘King Lear.’New Theatre Quarterly 9.34 (1993): 172–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730–1830. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.Google Scholar
Beckerman, Bernard. Shakespeare at the Globe. New York: Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar
Bennett, Susan. Performing Nostalgia: Shifting Shakespeare and the Contemporary Past. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Bevington, David. Action Is Eloquence: Shakespeare’s Language of Gesture. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, John Russell. Shakespeare and the Theatrical Event. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Thomas. The Life of Mrs Siddons. 2 vols. London: Effingham Wilson, 1834.Google Scholar
Dillon, Janette. Theatre, Court, and City, 1596–1610: Drama and Social Space in London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Dobson, Michael. The Making of the National Poet: Shakespeare, Adaptation and Authorship, 1660–1769. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Downes, John. Roscius Anglicanus, or an Historical Overview of the Stage. London: 1708.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew. Playgoing in Shakespeare’s London. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
The Henslowe-Alleyn Digitization Project. http://www.henslowe-alleyn.org.uk/essays/henslowediary.html. Kings College London, 2005.Google Scholar
Heywood, Thomas. An Apology for Actors. London: 1612.Google Scholar
Highfill, Philip H. Jr., Burnim, Kalman A., and Langhans, Edward A., eds. A Biographical Dictionary of Actors, Actresses, Musicians, Dancers, Managers, and Other Stage Personnel in London, 1660–1800. 16 vols. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1973–93.Google Scholar
Hodgdon, Barbara. The Shakespeare Trade: Performances and Appropriations. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1998.Google Scholar
Hodges, C. Walter. The Globe Restored: A Study of the Elizabethan Theatre. New York: Norton, 1973.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter. “Hearing the Dead: The Sound of David Garrick.” Players, Playwrights, Playhouses: Investigating Performance, 1660–1800. Ed. Cordner, Michael and Holland, Peter. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 248–70.Google Scholar
Manley, Lawrence. “From Strange’s Men to Pembroke’s Men: 2 Henry VI and The First Part of the Contention.” Shakespeare Quarterly 54.3 (2003): 253–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, Scott, and MacLean, Sally Beth. The Queen’s Men and Their Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Mullaney, Steven. The Place of the Stage: License, Play, and Power in Renaissance England. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagler, A. M. Shakespeare’s Stage. New Haven: Yale UP, 1958.Google Scholar
Odell, George C. D. Shakespeare from Betterton to Irving. New York: Scribner, 1920.Google Scholar
Orrell, John, and Gurr, Andrew. Rebuilding Shakespeare’s Globe. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Simon, and Stern, Tiffany. Shakespeare in Parts. New York: Oxford UP, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascoe, Judith. The Sarah Siddons Audio Files: Romanticism and the Lost Voice. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepys, Samuel. The Diary of Samuel Pepys. Eds. Latham, Robert and Matthews, William. 11 vols. Berkeley: U of California P, 1970–83.Google Scholar
Phelan, Peggy. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Raab, Michael. “Peter Zadek.” The Routledge Companion to Directors’ Shakespeare. Ed. Brown, John Russell. London: Routledge, 2008. 509–25.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Marvin. The Masks of Othello: The Search for the Identity of Othello, Iago, and Desdemona by Three Centuries of Actors and Critics. Berkeley: U of California P, 1962.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Marvin. The Masks of King Lear. Berkeley: U of California P, 1972.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Marvin. The Masks of Macbeth. Berkeley: U of California P, 1978.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Marvin. The Masks of Hamlet. Newark: U of Delaware P, 1993.Google Scholar
Skura, Meredith Anne. Shakespeare the Actor and the Purposes of Playing. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce R. The Acoustic World of Early Modern England: Attending to the O-Factor. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1999.Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany. Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan. Oxford: Clarendon, 2000.Google Scholar
Styan, J. L. The Shakespeare Revolution: Criticism and Performance in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Walsh, Brian. Shakespeare, the Queen’s Men, and the Elizabethan Performance of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
West, Timothy. “The King of Comedy.” The Guardian [London] 6 April 2001. www.guardian.co.uk./books/2001/apr/07/books.guardianreview. Accessed 17 May 2013.Google Scholar
Zarrilli, Phillip B.For Whom Is the King a King? Issues of Intercultural Production, Perception, and Reception in a Kathakali King Lear.” Critical Theory and Performance. Ed. Reinelt, Janelle and Roach, Joseph. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2007. 108–33.Google Scholar

Further reading

Bate, Jonathan, and Jackson, Russell. Shakespeare: An Illustrated Stage History. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Brown, John Russell, ed. The Routledge Companion to Actors’ Shakespeare. New York: Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Shakespeares. Video and performance archive at globalshakespeares.mit.edu.Google Scholar
Slings & Arrows. 2003–06. movies.netflix.com.Google Scholar
Speight, Robert. Shakespeare on the Stage: An Illustrated History of Shakespearean Performance. Boston: Little, Brown, 1973.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Baldwin, T. W. The Organization and Personnel of the Shakespearean Company, 1927.Google Scholar
Beckerman, Bernard. Shakespeare at the Globe, 1599–1609. New York: Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar
Brown, John Russell. Shakespeare’s Plays in Performance. Milwaukee: Applause Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Chambers, E. K. The Elizabethan Stage. 4 vols. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1923.Google Scholar
Chambers, E. K. William Shakespeare; A Study of Facts and Problems. 2 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1930.Google Scholar
Child, Harold. “The Stage-History of King Henry the IV.” In Shakespeare, William. King Henry IV. Ed. Wilson, John Dover. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1946. 1: xxixxlvi.Google Scholar
Gray, Henry David. “The Roles of William Kemp.” Modern Language Review 25 (1930): 2673.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew. The Shakespearean Stage, 1574–1642. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Hogan, C. B. Shakespeare in the Theatre, 1701–1800. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon, 1952.Google Scholar
Munro, John, ed. The Shakespeare Allusion Book: A Collection of Allusions to Shakespeare from 1591 to 1700. 2 vols. London: Chatto and Windus, 1909.Google Scholar
Odell, George C. D. Shakespeare from Betterton to Irving. New York: Scribner, 1920.Google Scholar
Salgādo, Gāmini. Eyewitnesses of Shakespeare: First Hand Accounts of Performances, 1590–1890. New York: Barnes and Noble Books, 1975.Google Scholar
Sprague, Arthur Colby. Shakespeare’s Histories: Plays for the Stage. London: Society for Theatre Research, 1964.Google Scholar
Van Lennep, William, ed. The London Stage, 1600–1800. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1965.Google Scholar
Weil, Herbert. “On Expectation and Surprise: Shakespeare’s Construction of Character.” Shakespeare Survey 34 (1981): 3950.Google Scholar
Wickham, Glynne. Early English Stages, 1300–1600. 3 vols. London: Psychology Press, 1959–81.Google Scholar

Further reading

Taylor, Gary. “Shakespeare Plays on Renaissance Stages.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Stage. Ed. Wells, Stanley and Stanton, Sarah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 120.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Addison, Joseph. The Spectator 40, 16 April 1711.Google Scholar
Allen, Shirley S. Samuel Phelps and Sadler’s Wells Theatre. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Appleton, William W., and Burnim, Kalman A., eds. The Prompter: A Theatrical Paper (1734–1736). New York: Blom, 1966.Google Scholar
Bald, R. C.Shakespeare on the Stage in Restoration Dublin.” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 56 (1941): 369–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Lawrence. Edwin Forrest. Boston: J. R. Osgood, 1881.Google Scholar
Beckerman, Bernard. Shakespeare at the Globe, 1599–1609. New York: Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar
Blayney, Peter. The First Folio of Shakespeare. Washington: Folger Library Publications, 1991.Google Scholar
Bratton, Jackie. New Readings in Theatre History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Carlisle, Carol Jones. Shakespeare from the Greenroom. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1969.Google Scholar
Derrick, Leland Eugene. “The Stage History of King Lear.” Diss. U of Texas, 1940.Google Scholar
Genest, John. Some Account of the English Stage (London) 1660–1830. 10 vols. Bath: H. E. Carrington, 1832.Google Scholar
Harris, Arthur John. “Garrick, Colman, and King Lear.” Shakespeare Quarterly 22 (1971): 5962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, F. W. The Life of Edmond Kean. 2 vols. London: Tinsley Brothers, 1869.Google Scholar
Hayes, Malcolm. Sunday Telegraph (London), 29 January 1989: 17.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, H. N. Edmond Kean. New York: Columbia UP, 1933.Google Scholar
Houtchens, L. H., and Houtchens, C. W., eds. Leigh Hunt’s Dramatic Criticism, 1808–1811. New York: Columbia UP, 1949.Google Scholar
Kean, Charles, ed. Shakespeare’s Tragedy of King Lear: Arranged for Representation at the Princess’s Theatre with Historical and Explanatory Notes. London: J. K. Chapman & Co. [1858].Google Scholar
McManaway, James. “Additional Prompt-books of Shakespeare from the Smock Alley Theatre.” Modern Language Review 45 (1950): 6465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, George C. D. Shakespeare from Betterton to Irving. 2 vols. New York: Scribner, 1920.Google Scholar
Prager, Leonard. “Of Parents and Children: Jacob Gordin’s The Jewish King Lear.” American Quarterly 18 (1966): 506–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, James. The Life of Edwin Forrest. Philadelphia: T. B. Peterson and Brothers, 1874.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Marvin. The Masks of King Lear. Berkeley: U of California P, 1972.Google Scholar
Rostron, David. “John Philip Kemble’s King Lear of 1795.” The Eighteenth-Century English Stage. Ed. Richards, Kenneth and Thomson, Peter. London: Methuen, 1972. 149–70.Google Scholar
Salgādo, Gāmini. Eyewitnesses of Shakespeare: First Hand Accounts of Performances, 1590–1890. Eastbourne: Sussex UP, 1975.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of King Lear. London: [s.n.], 1663–64. (Folger PROMPT 3rd folio Lear Smock Alley)Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Life and Death of King Lear. London: J. Tonson, 1734. (Folger PROMPT Lear 30)Google Scholar
Shattuck, Charles. Shakespeare on the American Stage: From the Hallams to Edwin Booth. Washington: Folger Shakespeare Library, 1976.Google Scholar
Speaight, Robert. Shakespeare on the Stage. London: Collins, 1973.Google Scholar
Spencer, Christopher. Five Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1965.Google Scholar
Sprague, Arthur Colby. “Garrick as King Lear.” Shakespearian Players and Performances. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1953. 2140.Google Scholar
Stone, George Winchester Jr.Garrick’s Production of King Lear: A Study in the Temper of the Eighteenth-Century Mind.” Studies in Philology 45 (1948): 89103.Google Scholar
Stone, George Winchester. “The Making of the Repertory.” The London Theatre World, 1660–1800. Ed. Hume, Robert D.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1980. 181209.Google Scholar
Tate, Nahum. The History of King Lear. Acted at the Duke’s Theatre. Reviv’d with Alterations. London: E. Flesher, 1681.Google Scholar
Toynbee, William, ed. The Diaries of William Charles Macready, 1833–1851. 2 vols. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1912.Google Scholar
Van Lennep, William, ed. The London Stage, 1660–1800. Part I: 1660–1700. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1965.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974–81.Google Scholar
Winter, William. Shakespeare on the Stage: Second Series. New York: Moffat, Yard, and Company, 1915.Google Scholar
Woods, Leigh. Garrick Claims the Stage. Westport: Greenwood, 1984.Google Scholar

Further reading

Abrams, Richard. “The Double Casting of Cordelia and Lear’s Fool: A Theatrical View.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 27 (1985): 354–68.Google Scholar
Aycock, Wendell M., ed. Shakespeare’s Art from a Comparative Perspective. Lubbock: Texas Tech P, 1979.Google Scholar
Barroll, J. Leeds. Politics, Plague, and Shakespeare’s Theater. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Barroll, J. Leeds. “Shakespeare and the Plague.” Shakespeare’s Art from a Comparative Perspective. Ed. Aycock, Wendell M.. Lubbock: Texas Tech P, 1981. 2227.Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen. King Lear, Macbeth, Indefinition, and Tragedy. New Haven: Yale UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Kent. “Casting the Quarto King Lear.” Shakespeare Association of America seminar paper, April 1989.Google Scholar
Chambers, E. K. The Elizabethan Stage. 4 vols. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1923.Google Scholar
Chambers, E. K. Shakespeare: A Survey. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1926.Google Scholar
Davies, Thomas. Dramatic Miscellanies. London: S. Price, 1783.Google Scholar
King, T. J. Shakespearean Staging, 1599–1642. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Marsden, Jean. “Improving Shakespeare: From the Restoration to Garrick.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Stage. Ed. Wells, Stanley and Stanton, Sarah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 2136.Google Scholar
Meagher, John. “Economy and Recognition: Thirteen Shakespearean Puzzles.” Shakespeare Quarterly 35 (1984): 721.Google Scholar
Melchiori, Giorgio. “Peter, Balthasar, and Shakespeare’s Art of Doubling.” Modern Language Review 78 (1983): 777–92Google Scholar
Murphy, John J. Darkness and Devils. Athens: Ohio UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Ringler, William A. Jr.Shakespeare and His Actors: Some Remarks on King Lear.” The Eighteenth-Century English Stage. Ed. Richards, Kenneth and Thomson, Peter. London: Methuen, 1972. 123–34.Google Scholar
Sisson, C. J.Shakespeare’s Quartos as Prompt-Copies, with Some Account of Cholmeley’s Players and a New Shakespeare Allusion.” Renaissance English Studies 18 (1942): 129–43.Google Scholar
Trewin, J. C. Shakespeare on the English Stage, 1900–1964. London: Barrie and Rockliff, 1964.Google Scholar
Williamson, Audrey. Contemporary Theatre, 1953–1956. London: Rockliff, 1956.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Armstrong, W. A.Bernard Shaw and Forbes-Robertson’s Hamlet.” Shakespeare Quarterly 15 (1964): 2731.Google Scholar
Browne, Martin. “English Hamlets of the Twentieth Century.” Shakespeare Survey 9 (1956): 1623.Google Scholar
Child, Harold, and Wilson, John Dover, eds. Hamlet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Edwards, Philip. “Introduction.” Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 182.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore, ed. Shakespearean Prompt-Books of the Seventeenth Century. Vol. 4. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1966.Google Scholar
Garrick, David. Letters. Ed. Little, D. M. and Kahrl, G. M.. 2 vols. Cambridge: Belknap, 1963.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, Charles. The Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays. 1817. Complete Works. Ed. Howe, P. P.. 4 vols. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1930–34.Google Scholar
Ingleby, C. M., Smith, L. Toulmin, and Furnivall, F. J., eds. The Shakespeare Allusion-Book. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1932.Google Scholar
Paul, H. N. Modern Language Notes 49 (1934): 438–43.Google Scholar
Shattuck, Charles. Hamlet of Edwin Booth. Champaign: U of Illinois P, 1969.Google Scholar
Spencer, Hazelton. “Hamlet under the Restoration.” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 38 (1923): 770–91.Google Scholar
Spencer, Hazelton. Shakespeare Improved. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1927.Google Scholar
Stone, G. W.Garrick’s Long Lost Alteration of Hamlet.” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 49 (1934): 890921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further reading

Hapgood, Robert. Hamlet: Shakespeare in Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Marsden, Jean. “Improving Shakespeare: From the Restoration to Garrick.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Stage. Ed. Wells, Stanley and Stanton, Sarah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 2136.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Mrs. Calvert, Charles [Helen, Adelaide]. Sixty-Eight Years on the Stage. London: Mills and Boon, 1911.Google Scholar
Mrs. Calvert, Charles [Helen, Adelaide]. “Promptbook.” Henry the Fifth: A Historical Play in Five Acts by William Shakespeare. As Produced at Booth’s Theatre, New York, February 8, 1875. Ed. Newton, Charles E.. New York: Robert de Witt, 1875. 36.Google Scholar
Cole, John William. The Life and Theatrical Times of Charles Kean, FSA. 2 vols. London: Richard Bentley, 1859.Google Scholar
Coleman, John. Fifty Years of an Actor’s Life. 2 vols. London: Hutchinson, 1904.Google Scholar
Cook, Dutton. Nights at the Play: A View of the English Stage. 2 vols. London: Chatto and Windus, 1883.Google Scholar
Darbyshire, Alfred. The Art of the Victorian Stage: Notes and Recollections. London: Sherratt and Hughes, 1907.Google Scholar
Davidson, Levette J.Shakespeare in the Rockies.” Shakespeare Quarterly 4 (1953): 3950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Richard. The Calverts: Actors of Some Importance. London: Society for Theatre Research, 1992.Google Scholar
Foulkes, RichardCharles Calvert’s Henry V.” Shakespeare Survey 41 (1989): 2334.Google Scholar
James, Henry. The Scenic Art. Ed. Wade, Allan. London: R. Hart-Davis, 1949.Google Scholar
Kean, Charles. Shakespeare’s Play of King Henry V, Arranged for Representation at the Princess Theater, with Historical and Explanatory Notes by C. Kean. London: J. K. Chapman, 1859.Google Scholar
Schoch, Richard. Shakespeare’s Victorian Stage: Performing History in the Theatre of Charles Kean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Shakespere’s Historical Play of Henry the Fifth As Produced by Mr. George Rignold at Drury Lane Theatre November 1st, 1879. London: 1880.Google Scholar

Further reading

Smith, Emma, ed. King Henry V: Shakespeare in Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Archer, William. Theatrical “World” of 1896. London: W. Scott, 1896.Google Scholar
Clement, Clara. Charlotte Cushman. Boston: J. R. Osgood, 1882.Google Scholar
Cole, John William. The Life and Theatrical Times of Charles Kean, F.S.A. 2 vols. London: Richard Bentley, 1859.Google Scholar
Coleman, John. Fifty Years of an Actor’s Life. 2 vols. London: Hutchinson, 1904.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George. Studies of Shakespeare. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1847.Google Scholar
Harrison, Clifford. Stray Records. London: R. Bentley and Son, 1892.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, Charles. Hazlitt on Theatre. 1895. Rpt. New York: Hill and Wang, 1957.Google Scholar
Jameson, Anna. Shakespeare’s Heroines. London: George Bell and Sons, 1879.Google Scholar
Kemble, Fanny. Records of a Girlhood. London: R. Bentley and Son, 1878.Google Scholar
Leach, Joseph. Bright Particular Star. New Haven: Yale UP, 1970.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jill. Romeo and Juliet. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Macready, William. Macready’s Reminiscences and Selections from His Diaries and Letters. Ed. Pollock, Frederick. 2 vols. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1875.Google Scholar
Martin, Helena Faucit. Shakespeare’s Female Characters. London: W. Blackwood and Sons, 1885.Google Scholar
Marshall, Gail. Actresses on the Victorian Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Merrill, Lisa. When Romeo Was a Woman. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2000.Google Scholar
Odell, George C. D. Shakespeare from Betterton to Irving. 2 vols. New York: Scribner, 1920.Google Scholar
Powell, Kerry. Women and Victorian Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Richards, Sandra. Rise of the English Actress. London: Macmillan, 1993.Google Scholar
Rowell, George. Queen Victoria. London: P. Elek, 1978.Google Scholar
Stebbins, Emma. Charlotte Cushman. Boston: Houghton, Osgood, 1878.Google Scholar
Winter, William. Other Days. New York: Moffat, Yard, 1908.Google Scholar
Winter, William. Shakespeare on the Stage. New York: Moffat, Yard, 1911.Google Scholar

Further reading

Gay, Penny. “Women and Shakespearean Performance.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Stage. Ed. Wells, Stanley and Stanton, Sarah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 156–75.Google Scholar
Loehlin, James. Romeo and Juliet: Shakespeare in Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Adriani, Anna. [review]. La Repubblica 3 April 1986.Google Scholar
Andrews, Nigel. “Critics’ Forum.” BBC Radio 3. 15 October 1988.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael. [review]. The Guardian [London] 29 November 1978.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael. [review]. The Guardian [London] 12 October 1988.Google Scholar
Boyd, Chris. [review]. Melbourne Times 16 May 1990.Google Scholar
Carr, Paula. elbourne Report 1 June 1990.Google Scholar
Chaillet, Ned. [review]. The Times [London] 13 August 1982.Google Scholar
Columba, Sergio. [review]. Carlino Spettacoli 5 April 1986.Google Scholar
Coveney, Michael. [review]. Financial Times [London] 13 August 1982.Google Scholar
Coveney, Michael. [review]. Financial Times [London] 12 October 1988.Google Scholar
Cumani, Claudio. [review]. Carlino Spettacoli 25 March 1986.Google Scholar
Cushman, Robert. [review]. The Observer [London] 15 August 1982.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth Lloyd. [review]. Stratford Herald 20 August 1982.Google Scholar
[Anonymous review.] Evesham Journal & Four Shires Advertiser 19 August 1982.Google Scholar
Farndon, Roy. Interview with Hudson, Richard. The Independent [London] 12 October 1988.Google Scholar
Foxon, Ellen. [review]. Birmingham Weekly Post 16 August 1957.Google Scholar
Geron, Gastone. [review]. Il Giornale 6 April 1986.Google Scholar
Grande, Maurizio. [review]. Rinascita 19 April 1986.Google Scholar
Hawley, David. [review]. St. Paul Dispatch 12 June 1981.Google Scholar
Hawley, David. [unidentified clipping seen by the author]. 14 June 1981.Google Scholar
[Anonymous review]. Illustrated London News 11 July 1857.Google Scholar
Kalem, T. E. [review]. The Times [London] 27 July 1981.Google Scholar
Kroll, Jack. [review]. Newsweek 29 June 1981.Google Scholar
Logan, Brian. [review]. The Guardian [London] 12 July 1996, 2:6. The program was broadcast on BBC2 Wales, 9 March 1997.Google Scholar
[Anonymous review]. Morning Star (London) 16 August 1982.Google Scholar
Neill, Rosemary. [review]. The Australian 17 May 1990.Google Scholar
Peter, John. [review]. Sunday Times [London] 16 October 1988.Google Scholar
Radic, Leonard. [review]. The Age 18 May 1990.Google Scholar
Rich, Frank. [review]. New York Times 7 April 1981.Google Scholar
Ronfani, Ugo. [review]. Il Giorno 6 April 1986.Google Scholar
[Anonymous review]. Shropshire Star 12 August 1982.Google Scholar
[Anonymous review]. South Wales Argus 12 August 1982.Google Scholar
Steele, Mike. [review]. Minneapolis Tribune 13 June 1981.Google Scholar
Thomson, Helen. [review]. Sunday Herald [Glasgow] 20 May 1990.Google Scholar
Volli, Ugo. [review]. La Repubblica Spettacoli 5 April 1986.Google Scholar
Walker, Roy. “Unto Caesar: A Review of Recent Productions.” Shakespeare Survey 11 (1958): 135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521064244.Google Scholar
Webster, Margaret. Don’t Put Your Daughter on the Stage. New York: Knopf, 1972.Google Scholar
Worsley, T. C. [review]. New Statesman [London] 24 August 1957.Google Scholar
Young, B. A. [review]. Financial Times [London] 29 November 1978.Google Scholar
Zucconi, Giovanna. [review]. Paese Sera [Rome] 5 April 1986.Google Scholar

Further reading

Dymkowski, Christine. Harley Granville Barker: A Preface to Modern Shakespeare. Washington, DC: Folger Books, 1986.Google Scholar
Sherman, William, and Hulme, Peter, eds. The Tempest and Its Travels. London: Reaktion Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Styan, J. L. The Shakespeare Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Alexander, Bill. “The Director Bill Alexander Talks about Titus Andronicus and the Question of Revenge.” RSC Web site. https://www.rsc.org.uk. Accessed 11 June 2005.Google Scholar
Alexander, Bill. Titus Andronicus production journal. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. “Conquering Despair.” Times Literary Supplement 28 July 1995: 1819.Google Scholar
Bennett, Susan. Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael. “A Brutal Sort of Interrogation.” The Guardian [London] 14 July 1995: A21.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael. “Connoisseur of Cruelty.” The Guardian [London] 28 November 1989: 37.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael. “Theatre Review: Titus Andronicus.” The Guardian [London] 22 May 1997: A6.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael. “Titus Andronicus.” The Guardian [London] 24 September 2003: 26.Google Scholar
Buhler, Stephen. Shakespeare in the Cinema, Ocular Proof. Albany: State UP of New York,] 2002.Google Scholar
Burt, Richard. “Shakespeare and the Holocaust: Julie Taymor’s Titus Is Beautiful, or Shakesploi Meets (the) Camp.” Shakespeare after Mass Media. Ed. Burt, Richard. New York: Palgrave, 2002. 295329.Google Scholar
Carnegy, Patrick. “Seriously Bloody.” The Spectator 4 October 2003: 6364.Google Scholar
Cartmell, Deborah. Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen. New York: St. Martin’s, 2000.Google Scholar
Ciglar-Zanic, Janja. “Recruiting the Bard: Onstage and Offstage Glimpses of Recent Shakespeare Productions in Croatia.” Shakespeare in the New Europe. Ed. Hattaway, Michael, Sokolova, Boika, and Roper, Derek. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1994. 261–75.Google Scholar
Cotes, Alison. “Titus Andronicus: Blood Curdling Saga.” The Brisbane Review June 1995.Google Scholar
Doran, Gregory, and Sher, Antony. Woza Shakespeare! London: Methuen Drama, 1996.Google Scholar
Dunne, Christopher. “TITUS ANDRONICUS is a killer! (In more ways than one).” Movie trailer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzLFzb3rV4w. Accessed 6 November 2014.Google Scholar
Fuzier, J., Laroque, F., and Maguin, J. M.. “Titus Andronicus.” Cahiers Elisabéthains 25 (April 1984).Google Scholar
Gardner, Lyn. [review]. The Guardian [London] 19 May 1997: G2.Google Scholar
Goy-Blanquet, Dominique. “Titus resartus: Deborah Warner, Peter Stein and Daniel Mesguich Have a Cut at Titus Andronicus.”Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance. Ed. Kennedy, Dennis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 3655.Google Scholar
Gulino, Fabiola. “Peter Stein’s Titus at the Teatro Genova, 1990.” Titus Andronicus: Critical Essays. Ed. Kolin, Philip C.. New York: Garland, 1995.Google Scholar
Hall, Phil. “Richard Griffin: Brushing Up His Shakespeare.” Film Threat 12 December 2000. http://www.filmthreat.com. Accessed 15 July 2003.Google Scholar
Hughes, Alan. Titus Andronicus. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Dennis, ed. Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kermode, Mark. “Review.” Newsnight. BBC-TV. 26 September 2003.Google Scholar
Kingston, Jeremy. “Curtains for Shakespeare’s Worst.” The Times [London] 22 May 1997.Google Scholar
Kolin, Philip C., ed. Titus Andronicus: Critical Essays. New York: Garland, 1995.Google Scholar
Kott, J. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. New York: Doubleday, 1964.Google Scholar
Martyn, Patrick. The Stage 17 December 1992: n.p.Google Scholar
Parry, Robert Lloyd. Plays International August 1995: 11.Google Scholar
Quadri, Franco. “Tiro Andronico in doppio petto.” La Repubblica 26–27 November 1989.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. Essays in Performance Theory, 1970–1976. New York: Drama Book Specialists, 1977.Google Scholar
Spencer, Charles. “The Horror, the Humour.” The Weekly Telegraph [London] 8 October 2003.Google Scholar
Starks, Lisa S.Cinema of Cruelty: Powers of Horror in Julie Taymor’s Titus.” The Reel Shakespeare. Alternative Cinema and Theory. Ed. Starks, Lisa S. and Lehmann, Courtney. Madison: Farleigh Dickinson UP, 2002. 121–42.Google Scholar
Taymor, Julie. “Titus”: The Illustrated Screenplay. New York: Newmarket, 2000.Google Scholar
Tempera, Mariangela. Feasting with Centaurs: Titus Andronicus from Stage to Text. Bologna: Clueb Edritice, 1999.Google Scholar
Thébaud, Marion. “Les curiosités de Raf Vallone.” Le Figaro [Paris] 4 May 1990.Google Scholar
Titus Andronicus.” Times Literary Supplement [London] 24 September 1993.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. Shakespeare, Co-Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Waller, Richard. “Daring Staging Lends Grisly Reality to Play.” The Sunday Mail [London] 9 June 1995.Google Scholar
Wiltenburg, Mary. “Shakespeare Behind Bars.” Christian Science Monitor December 2001. csmonitor.com.Google Scholar
Xu, Qiping. “Directing Titus Andronicus in China, 1986.” Trans. Zheng, Jianqing. Titus Andronicus: Critical Essays. Ed. Kolin, Philip C.. New York: Garland, 1995.Google Scholar

Further reading

Dessen, Alan. Titus Andronicus: Shakespeare in Performance. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1990.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Burt, Richard. Unspeakable ShaXXXspeares, Revised Edition: Queer Theory and American Kiddie Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999.Google Scholar
Devlin-Glass, Frances. “Teasing the Audience with the Play: Feminism and Shakespeare at the Melbourne Theater Company, 1984–93.” Australasian Drama Studies 33 (October 1998): 2139.Google Scholar
Gay, Penny. “Recent Australian Shrews: The ‘Larrikin Element.’Shakespeare and the Twentieth Century. Ed. Bate, Jonathan, Levenson, Jill L., and Miehl, Dieter. London: Associated UP, 1998. 168–82.Google Scholar
Hodgdon, Barbara. The Shakespeare Trade: Performances and Appropriations. Philadelphia: U Pennsylvania P, 1984.Google Scholar

Further reading

Gay, Penny. “Women and Shakespearean Performance.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Stage. Ed. Wells, Stanley and Stanton, Sarah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 156–75.Google Scholar
Kamaralli, Anna. Shakespeare and the Shrew: Performing the Defiant Female Voice. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Schafer, Elizabeth, ed. The Taming of the Shrew: Shakespeare in Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Abarbanel, Jonathan. [review]. Windy City Times [Chicago] 11 December 2002.Google Scholar
[Anonymous review]. Algemeen Dagblad [Rotterdam] 11 September 1995.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Gerald. “Review of Peter Hall (RST 1995).” Shakespeare Bulletin (winter 1996): 10.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael. “Is There a Crisis in Shakespearean Acting?” The Guardian [London] 10 April 1987: 19.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael. “This Year’s Best Bet.” The Guardian [London] 30 July 2001: B10.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael. “The Two Timing Tyrant.” The Guardian [London] 1 November 1991: 25.Google Scholar
Bots, Pieter. Het Parool [Amsterdam] 7 May 1999.Google Scholar
Deveson, Tom. Around the Globe 11 (autumn 1999).Google Scholar
Dorrell, Stephen. Around the Globe 10 (summer 1999).Google Scholar
Edmonds, Richard. Birmingham Post 6 October 1993.Google Scholar
Freriks, Kester. NRC Handelsblad [Amsterdam] 19 May 1999.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Michael. Shakespeare Quarterly 48 (spring 1997): 8490.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew. Around The Globe 11 (autumn 1999).Google Scholar
Holland, Peter. Shakespeare Survey 49 (1996): 235–68.Google Scholar
Hortmann, Wilhelm. Shakespeare on The German Stage. Vol. 2: The Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. (German edition: Shakespeare und das deutsche Theater im 20. Jahrhundert, 2001). 212–29.Google Scholar
Jackson, Russell. [review]. Shakespeare Quarterly 47 (1996): 319.Google Scholar
Kole, Robert. [review]. Shakespeare Bulletin (summer 1999): 1415.Google Scholar
Lapworth, Paul. [review]. Stratford Herald 8 November 1991.Google Scholar
Lennox, Patricia. [review]. Shakespeare Bulletin (fall 2000): 8.Google Scholar
Liebler, Naomi, ed. The Female Tragic Hero in English Renaisssance Drama. New York: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar
Liston, William T. [review]. Shakespeare Bulletin, (fall 2001): 3031.Google Scholar
Liston, William T. [review]. Shakespeare Bulletin (winter 2002): 47.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Alastair. [review]. The Financial Times [London] 7 August 1993.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Robert. [review]. Shakespeare Newsletter (summer 2000).Google Scholar
McGill, Stewart. [review]. The Stage 28 November 1991.Google Scholar
Newman, Peter. [review]. Shakespeare Bulletin (spring 1998): 28.Google Scholar
Nightingale, Benedict. “Rivers of blood, but passion dries up.” The Times [London] 7 July 1995.Google Scholar
Paster, Gail Kern. The Body Embarrassed: Drama and the Disciplines of Shame in Early Modern England. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Peter, John. [review]. The Sunday Times [London] 5 August 2001.Google Scholar
Potter, Lois. [review]. Shakespeare Quarterly 50 (1999): 509–11.Google Scholar
Preston, Rohan. [review]. Minneapolis Star Tribune 5 March 1999: 7E.Google Scholar
Preston, Rohan. [review]. Minneapolis Star Tribune 5 March 2002.Google Scholar
Savin, Janet. [review]. Shakespeare Bulletin (winter 2001): 2930.Google Scholar
Shurgot, Michael W. [review]. Shakespeare Bulletin (spring 1999).Google Scholar
Spencer, Charles. “A moralist’s mountainous fall from grace.” The Daily Telegraph [London] 1 November 1991: 130.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. “Shakespeare Performed: Theatrical Proximities. The Stratford Festival 1998.” Shakespeare Quarterly 50 (1999): 334–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, Neil. “National and Racial Stereotypes in Shakespeare Films.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. Ed. Jackson, Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 267–79.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul. “Julius Caesar RSC Stratford upon Avon.” The Independent [London] 7 July 1995: 10.Google Scholar
Trewin, J. C. [review]. The Birmingham Post 9 April 1987.Google Scholar
Vincent, , Ed. [review]. Windy City Times [Chicago] 11 December 2002.Google Scholar
Wardle, Irving. [review]. The Times [London] 10 April 1987.Google Scholar
Watermeier, Daniel J. [review]. Shakespeare Bulletin (winter 1994).Google Scholar
Watermeier, Daniel J. [review]. Shakespeare Bulletin (spring 1999).Google Scholar
Williams, Albert. [review]. Chicago Reader 6 March 1998.Google Scholar

Further reading

Hortmann, Wilhelm. “Shakespeare on the Political Stage in the Twentieth Century.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Stage. Ed. Wells, Stanley and Stanton, Sarah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 212–29.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Billington, Michael. [review]. The Guardian [London] 18 April 1990.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael. “Witty naval gazing.” The Guardian [London] 8 July 1993: A10.Google Scholar
Brode, Douglas. Shakespeare in the Movies: From the Silent Era to “Shakespeare in Love.” Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Cartmell, Deborah. Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.Google Scholar
Cox, John F. Much Ado about Nothing: Shakespeare in Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dungate, Rod. Plays and Players (December 1996/January 1997).Google Scholar
“Fleetwood Back.” RSC Magazine August 1991.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael J.Male Bonds and Marriage in All’s Well and Much Ado.” Studies in English Literature 35 (1995): 231–49.Google Scholar
Gay, Penny. As She Likes It. Shakespeare’s Unruly Women. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter. English Shakespeares: Shakespeare on the English Stage in the 1990s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney. “Much Ado about Nothing? Shakespeare, Branagh and the ‘National-popular’ in the Age of Multinational Capital.” Textual Practice 12 (1998): 122.Google Scholar
Mason, Pamela. Much Ado about Nothing: Text and Performance. New York: Macmillan, 1992.Google Scholar
Morley, Sheridan. [review]. International Herald Tribune. 1998.Google Scholar
Ramsden, Timothy. Plays and Players (August 1993).Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth. A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, Ian. The Financial Times 18 February 1998.Google Scholar
Smallwood, Robert. “Shakespeare Performances in England, 1997.” Shakespeare Survey 51 (1998): 219–56.Google Scholar
Smallwood, Robert. “Shakespeare Performances in England, 1998.” Shakespeare Survey 52 (1999): 229–53.Google Scholar
Steed, Maggie. “Beatrice in Much Ado About Nothing.” Further Essays in Shakespearean Performance by Players of the Royal Shakespeare Company. Ed. Jackson, Russell and Smallwood, Robert. Players of Shakespeare 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 4251.Google Scholar
Tanitch, Robert. Plays and Players (August 1993): 4259.Google Scholar
Wells, Stanley. Unpublished speech at the fiftieth anniversary of the Shakespeare Institute, 2001.Google Scholar

Further reading

Thomson, Peter. “The Comic Actor and Shakespeare.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Stage. Ed. Wells, Stanley and Stanton, Sarah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 137–54.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Billington, Michael. [review]. The Guardian [London] 18 September 1987.Google Scholar
Davies, Anthony. Filming Shakespeare’s Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Peter S. Shakespearean Films/ Shakespearean Directors. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1990.Google Scholar
Goodwin, James. Akira Kurosawa and Intertextual Cinema. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Gordon, Giles. Plays and Players 410 (November 1987): 1819.Google Scholar
Kishi, Tetsuo. “‘Bless Thee! Thou Art Translated!’”: Shakespeare in Japan.” Images in Shakespeare. Ed. Habicht, Werner et al. London: Associated UP, 1988. 245–50.Google Scholar
Kurosawa, Akira. Seven Samuri” and Other Screenplays. London: Faber, 1992.Google Scholar
Leech, Michael. Interview with Ninagawa, Yukio. What’s on in London 17 September 1987.Google Scholar
Mullin, Michael. “Stage and Screen: The Trevor Nunn Macbeth.” Shakespeare Quarterly 38 (1987): 350–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulryne, Ronnie. “From Text to Foreign Stage: Yukio Ninagawa’s Cultural Translation of Macbeth.” Shakespeare from Text to Stage. Ed. Kennan, Patricia and Tempera, Mariangela. Bologna: CLUEB, 1992. 131–43.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth, and Melzer, Annabelle. Shakespeare on Screen: An International Filmography and Videography. New York: Neal-Schuman, 1990.Google Scholar
Whitebrook, Peter. The Scotsman 24 August 1985.Google Scholar

Further reading

Gillies, John. “Shakespeare on the Stages of Asia.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Stage. Ed. Wells, Stanley and Stanton, Sarah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 259–83.Google Scholar
Kliman, Bernice, ed. Macbeth: Shakespeare in Performance. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2004.Google Scholar
Wilders, John, ed. Macbeth: Shakespeare in Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Sources cited

Billington, Michael. [review]. The Guardian [London] 28 May 2004.Google Scholar
Burley, Oli. “Talented Cast Has the Measure of Shakespeare Classic.” www.indielondon.co.uk. Accessed 11 August 2014.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Dominic. “Darkness in the Daylight: Measure for Measure at Shakespeare’s Globe.” The Daily Telegraph [London]. www.telegraph.co.uk. 16.Google Scholar
Clover, David. [online review]. http://www.curtainup.com.Google Scholar
de Jongh, Nicholas. “Menace for Menace as Tragicomedy Turns to Nightmare.” Evening Standard [London] 28 May 2004.Google Scholar
Dessen, Alan C.Measure for Measure at the RSC: 1997–8.” http://www.holycross.edu. Accessed 15 May 2013.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael D. “Prostitution and Feminist Appropriation of Measure for Measure on the Stage.” http://www.holycross.edu. Accessed 15 May 2013.Google Scholar
Gardner, Lyn. The Guardian [London] 2 July 2004.Google Scholar
Geckle, George L.Review of Measure for Measure. Royal Shakespeare Company.” Shakespeare Bulletin 13.1 (1995): 1214.Google Scholar
Hemming, Sarah. [review]. Financial Times [London] 22 January 1999: 12.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter. “Shakespeare Performances in England.” Shakespeare Survey 45 (1992): 115–44.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter. “Shakespeare Performances in England.” Shakespeare Survey 48 (1996): 191226.Google Scholar
Jackson, Russell. “Shakespeare at Stratford-upon-Avon, 1994–95.” Shakespeare Quarterly 46 (1995): 340–57.Google Scholar
Maguin, Jean-Marie. “Review of Measure for Measure. Royal Shakespeare Company.” Cahiers Elisabéthains 47 (1995): 105–07.Google Scholar
Mickelthwaite, Brian. Brian’s Culture Blog. 21 December 2004. http://www.brianmicklethwait.com/culture//cat_theatre.shtml. Accessed 15 May 2013.Google Scholar
Nicol, David. “Measure for Measure, a Co-production of Theatre de Complicité and the National Theatre Company at the Olivier Theatre.” Early Modern Literary Studies 10 (2004).Google Scholar
Nightingale, Benedict. [review]. The Times [London] 22 January 1999: 33.Google Scholar
Smith, P. J.Measure for Measure: Directed by Trevor Nunn.” Cahiers Elisabéthains 42 (1992): 80.Google Scholar
Walker, Greg. “Measure for Measure: Directed by Michael Boyd.” Cahiers Elisabéthains 54 (1998): 127.Google Scholar

Further reading

Nicholls, Graham. Measure for Measure: Text and Performance. London: Macmillan Education, 1986.Google Scholar
Smallwood, Robert. “Twentieth-Century Performance: The Stratford and London Companies.” The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Stage. Ed. Wells, Stanley and Stanton, Sarah. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 98117.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×