Book contents
- The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature
- The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Chapter 2 Canons
- Chapter 3 Periodisations
- Chapter 4 Author and Identity
- Chapter 5 Intertextuality
- Chapter 6 Mediaeval Latin
- Chapter 7 Neo-Latin
- Chapter 8 Reception
- Chapter 9 National Traditions
- Chapter 10 Editing
- Chapter 11 Latin Literature and Linguistics
- Chapter 12 Latin Literature and Material Culture
- Chapter 13 Philosophy
- Chapter 14 Political Thought
- Chapter 15 Latin Literature and Roman History
- Chapter 16 Latin Literature and Greek
- Envoi
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Chapter 3 - Periodisations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2024
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature
- The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Chapter 2 Canons
- Chapter 3 Periodisations
- Chapter 4 Author and Identity
- Chapter 5 Intertextuality
- Chapter 6 Mediaeval Latin
- Chapter 7 Neo-Latin
- Chapter 8 Reception
- Chapter 9 National Traditions
- Chapter 10 Editing
- Chapter 11 Latin Literature and Linguistics
- Chapter 12 Latin Literature and Material Culture
- Chapter 13 Philosophy
- Chapter 14 Political Thought
- Chapter 15 Latin Literature and Roman History
- Chapter 16 Latin Literature and Greek
- Envoi
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Summary
Periodisations are inevitable and useful short-cuts in conceptualising the past. But they are often inherited without reflection or a clear idea of their origins; in literature they can endow fashionable aesthetic judgements with lasting canonical force in ways that can be intellectually harmful. Latin is a language with a literary history of over two millennia, with highly differentiated levels of survival from different periods, and with a complex scholarly tradition: its periodisation is both important and challenging. I open with three vignettes of attitudes to Latin literature which in their different ways show the tendency to esteem antiquity above all. I look at six possible ways in which the history of Latin literature has been periodised or could be better periodised, with a recurring focus on two particularly dynamic periods : the last half-century before Christ and the fourth and fifth centuries of our era. An examination of changes in language, metre, prose rhythm, politics, religion and book history is used to challenge and test established periodisations, and to suggest the benefits of a greater acknowledgement of continuities and the longue durée.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature , pp. 97 - 157Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Adams, J. N. (2007) The Regional Diversification of Latin 200 bc–ad 200, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, R. (1736) Thesaurus linguae Latinae compendiarius, or, A Compendious Dictionary of the Latin Tongue: Designed for the Use of the British Nations, London. With 2nd edn, 1746.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005) ‘The search for the perfect book: a PS to the new Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller, K, ed., The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book (Oxford), 320–42.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. (1998) Ammianus Marcellinus and the Representation of Historical Reality, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D (2009) ‘The first emperor: the view of late antiquity’, in Griffin, M., ed., A Companion to Julius Caesar (Malden, MA), 277–87.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2002) ‘Ciceronian correspondences: making a book out of letters’, in Wiseman, T. P., ed., Classics in Progress (Oxford), 103–44.Google Scholar
Berger, J.-D., Fontaine, J. and Schmidt, P. L., eds. (2020) Die Literatur im Zeitalter des Theodosius (374–430 n. Chr.), 2 vols., Munich (= HLL 6).Google Scholar
Bourgain, P. (2016) ‘The works of Gregory of Tours: manuscripts, language, and style’, in Murray, A. C., ed., Brill’s Companion to Gregory of Tours (Leiden), 141–88.Google Scholar
Brandes, W. (1905) Des Auspicius von Toul rhythmische Epistel an Arbogastes von Trier, Wolfenbüttel.Google Scholar
Braund, S. M. (1998) ‘Praise and protreptic in early imperial panegyric: Cicero, Seneca, Pliny’, in Whitby, M., ed., The Propaganda of Power: The Role of Panegyric in Late Antiquity (Leiden), 53–76.Google Scholar
Brown, P. R. L. (1971) The World of Late Antiquity: From Marcus Aurelius to Muhammad, London.Google Scholar
Burgess, R. W. and Kulikowski, M. (2013) Mosaics of Time: The Latin Chronicle Traditions from the First Century bc to the Sixth Century ad. Volume 1: A Historical Introduction to the Chronicle Genre from Its Origins to the High Middle Ages, Turnhout.Google Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (2006) ‘The fabella of Sulpicia (Epigrammata Bobiensia 37)’, Phoenix 60: 70–121.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. (2008) ‘Sigmatic ecthlipsis in Lucretius’, Hermes 136: 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. M. (2003) ‘Byzance dans le débat sur orientalisme’, in Auzepy, M.-F., ed., Byzance en Europe (Paris), 235–50.Google Scholar
Campana, A. (1964) ‘Lettera del cardinale Padovano (Bartolomeo Oliari) a Coluccio Salutati’, in Henderson, C. Jr, ed., Medieval and Renaissance Studies in Honor of Bertold Louis Ullmann (Rome), ii 237–54.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. and Fioretti, P. (2014) ‘Chiaroscuro: oltre l’angolo di scrittura (secoli I a.C.–VI d.C.)’, Scripta 7: 29–64.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, L. (2018) Contributions to the History of the Latin Elegiac Distich, Turnhout.Google Scholar
Clackson, J. and Horrocks, G., eds. (2007) The Blackwell History of the Latin Language, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Consolino, F. E. (2017) ‘Polymetry in later Latin poems’, in Elsner, J. and Hernández Lobato, J., eds., The Poetics of Late Latin Literature (New York), 100–24.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1994) Latin Literature: A History (trans. J. Solodow; rev. D. Fowler and G. W. Most), Baltimore.Google Scholar
Conybeare, C. and Goldhill, S., eds. (2020) Classical Philology and Theology: Entanglement, Disavowal, and the Godlike Scholar, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Copley, F. O. (1968) Latin Literature from the Beginnings to the Close of the Second Century ad, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. et al., eds. (2013) The Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1987) ‘Imitation, chronologie littéraire et Calpurnius Siculus’, REL 65: 148–57.Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. (1953) European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages (trans. W. R. Trask), Princeton.Google Scholar
Davis, K. and Puett, M. (2015) ‘Periodization and “The Medieval Globe”: a conversation’, The Medieval Globe 2: 1–14.Google Scholar
Denecker, T. (2018) ‘Among Latinists: Alfred Ernout and Einar Löfstedt’s responses to the “Nijmegen School” and its Christian Sondersprache hypothesis’, Historiographica Linguistica 45: 325–62.Google Scholar
Dolbeau, F. (1998) ‘Découvertes récentes d’oeuvres latines inconnues (fin IIIe–début VIIIe siècle)’, SEJG 38: 101–42.Google Scholar
Dorfbauer, L. J. (2010) ‘Die praefationes von Claudian und von Prudentius’, in Zimmerl-Panagl, V. and Weber, D., eds., Text und Bild (Vienna), 195–222.Google Scholar
Duff, J. W. (1909) A Literary History of Rome from the Origins to the Close of the Golden Age, London.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2001) Latin Language and Latin Culture from Ancient to Modern Times, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2016) Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, E. (1776–88) The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, 6 vols., London (cited by original volume and chapter and by pages in the edition of D. Womersley, Harmondsworth, 1994).Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2020) ‘Sidonius’ correspondence’, in Kelly, and Van Waarden, 2020, 373–92.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2021) ‘Fifty years of green and yellow: the Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics series 1970–2020’, in Harrison, S. and Pelling, C., eds., Classical Scholarship and its History from the Renaissance to the Present: Essays in Honour of Chris Stray (Berlin), 175–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. (2012) Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger: An Introduction, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2020) ‘The union and divorce of classical philology and theology’, in Conybeare and Goldhill 2020, 33–62.Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. (1983) ‘The Oxford Latin Dictionary’, Proceedings of the African Classical Associations 17: 124–36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Gowing, A. (2005) Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, A. and Williams, M. (2006) Christianity and the Transformation of the Book: Origen, Eusebius, and the Library of Caesarea, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Heck, E. (1997) ‘Commodianus’, in Sallmann, K, ed., Die Literatur des Umbruchs: Von der römischen zur christlichen Literatur 115–283 n. Chr. (Munich) (= HLL 4), 628–37.Google Scholar
Heerink, M. (2009) ‘Misconceptions about the art of ancient publishing: Catullus’ book of poetry reconsidered’, International Journal of the Book 6: 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández Lobato, J. (2020) ‘Sidonius in the Middle Ages and Renaissance’, in Kelly and Van Waarden 2020, 665–85.Google Scholar
Herzog, R., ed. (1989) Restauration und Erneuerung: Die lateinische Literatur von 284 bis 374 n. Chr., Munich (= HLL 5). Translated as Restauration et renouveau: la littérature latine de 284 à 374 après J.-C. (Turnhout, 1993).Google Scholar
Hexter, R. (2005) ‘From the medieval historiography of Latin literature to the historiography of medieval Latin literature’, Journal of Medieval Latin 15: 1–24.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998), Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Holcombe, C. (2017) ‘Was medieval China medieval? (Post-Han to mid-Tang)’, in Szonyi, M., ed., A Companion to Chinese History (Chichester), 106–17.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (2017) ‘Fronto’s and Gellius’ veteres’, in Rocchi, S and Mussini, C, eds., Imagines antiquitatis: Representations, Concepts, Receptions of the Past in Roman Antiquity and the Early Italian Renaissance (Berlin), 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1997) ‘Criteria for the dating of Calpurnius Siculus’, RFIC 125, 166–96.Google Scholar
Humphries, M. (2017) ‘Late antiquity and world history’, Studies in Late Antiquity 1: 8–37.Google Scholar
Janson, T. (1975) Prose Rhythm in Medieval Latin from the 9th to the 13th Century, Stockholm.Google Scholar
John, A. (2018) ‘A cultural history of education in late antique Gaul’. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Keeline, T. and Kirby, T. (2019) ‘Auceps syllabarum: a digital analysis of Latin prose rhythm’, JRS 109: 161–204.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. J. (2018) ‘Edward Gibbon and late antique literature’, in McGill, S. and Watts, E., eds., A Companion to Late Antique Literature (Oxford), 611–26.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. J and van Waarden, J., eds. (2020) The Edinburgh Companion to Sidonius Apollinaris, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V., eds. (1982) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Vol. 2: Latin Literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keynes, G. (1940) The Library of Edward Gibbon: A Catalogue of His Books, London. With 2nd edn, 1980.Google Scholar
Kulikowski, M. (2017) Imperial Triumph: The Roman World from Hadrian to Constantine ad 138–363, London.Google Scholar
Larsen, M. D. C. and Letteney, M. (2019) ‘Christians and the codex: generic materiality and early Gospel traditions’, JECS 27: 383–415.Google Scholar
Leonhardt, G. (2013) Latin: Story of a World Language (trans. K. Kronenberg), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lühken, M. (2002) Christianorum Maro et Flaccus: Zur Vergil- und Horazrezeption des Prudentius, Göttingen.Google Scholar
McKitterick, R. (2008) Charlemagne: The Formation of a European Identity, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnelli, E. (2016) ‘The Nonnian hexameter’, in Accorinti, D., ed., Brill’s Companion to Nonnus of Panopolis (Leiden), 351–71.Google Scholar
Manitius, M. (1935) Handschriften antiker Autoren in mittelalterlichen Bibliothekskatalogen, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Martelli, F. (2017) ‘The triumph of letters: rewriting Cicero in Ad fam. 15’, JRS 107: 90–115.Google Scholar
Meier, M. (2019) Geschichte der Völkerwanderung: Europa, Asien und Afrika vom 3. bis zum 8. Jahrhundert n. Chr., Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercado, A. (2012) Italic Verse: A Study of the Poetic Remains of Old Latin, Faliscan, and Sabellic, Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Nixon, C. E. V. (1990) ‘Reading the past in the Gallic panegyrics’, in Clarke, G. et al., eds., Reading the Past in Late Antiquity (Rushcutter’s Bay, NSW), 1–36.Google Scholar
Norberg, D. (2004) An Introduction to the Study of Medieval Latin Versification, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Oberhelman, S. (2003) Prose Rhythm in Latin Literature of the Roman Empire: First Century bc to Fourth Century ad, Lewiston.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. (2004) ‘Late antiquity: before and after’, TAPhA 134: 203–13 (abbreviated version of APA Presidential address; fuller version at SCS website, https://classicalstudies.org/sites/default/files/documents/jod.pdf (last accessed 5 April 2021)).Google Scholar
O’Donnell, R. D. (1981) ‘The Querolus, edited with an introduction and commentary’, PhD thesis, Bedford College, University of London.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. (1996) ‘Classical scholarship’, in Kraye, J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism (Cambridge), 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, S. (1986) ‘Il latino nell’Umanesimo’, in Asor Rosa, A., Letteratura italiana. V. Le questioni (Turin), 379–408.Google Scholar
Rose, H. J. (1954) A Handbook of Latin Literature from the Earliest Times to the Death of St. Augustine, London.Google Scholar
Schafer, J. K. (2017) ‘Authorial pagination in the Eclogues and Georgics’, TAPhA 147: 135–78.Google Scholar
Schafer, J. K. (2020) Catullus through His Books: Dramas of Composition, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, B.-J. (1999) Titel und Text. Zur Entwicklung lateinischer Gedichtüberschriften, mit Untersuchungen zu lateinischen Buchtiteln, Inhaltsverzeichnissen und anderen Gliederungsmitteln, Berlin.Google Scholar
Settis, S. (2010) ‘Classical’, in Grafton, A., Most, G. W. and Settis, S., The Classical Tradition (Cambridge, MA), 205–6.Google Scholar
Shanzer, D. (2009) ‘Literature, history, periodization, and the pleasures of the Latin literary history of late antiquity’, History Compass 7: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spieß, T.-C. (2012) Die Sabinus-Briefe: Humanistische Fälschung oder antike Literatur? Einleitung – Edition – Übersetzung – Kommentar, Trier.Google Scholar
Stouraitis, Y. (2022) ‘Is Byzantinism an Orientalism? Reflections on Byzantium’s constructed identities and debated ideologies’, in Stouraitis, Y., ed., Identities and Ideologies in the Medieval East Roman World (Edinburgh), 19–47.Google Scholar
Turcan-Verkerk, A.-M. (2003) Un poète latin chrétien redécouvert: Latinius Pacatus Drepanius, panégyriste de Théodose, Brussels.Google Scholar
Valois, N. (1881) ‘Étude sur le rhythme des bulles pontificales’, Bibliothèque de l’école des chartes 42: 161–98 and 257–72.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, L. and Van Nuffelen, P. (2020) The Fragmentary Latin Historians of Late Antiquity (ad 300–620), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Van Waarden, J. and Kelly, G. (2020) ‘Sidonius’ prose rhythm’, in Kelly and Van Waarden 2020, 462–75.Google Scholar
Vessey, M. (2020) ‘Boethius in the genres of the book: philology, theology, codicology’, in Conybeare and Goldhill 2020, 149–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelock, F. M. (2011) Wheelock’s Latin. Seventh Edition (rev. R. A. LaFleur), New York.Google Scholar
White, P. (2019) Gallus Reborn: A Study of the Diffusion and Reception of Works Attributed to C. Cornelius Gallus, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (2011) ‘On ancient prose rhythm: the story of the dichoreus’, in Obbink, D. and Rutherford, R., eds., Culture in Pieces (Oxford), 262–76.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (2017) ‘The pleasures of editing’, Revue d’histoire des textes 12: 393–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, R. G. (2000) In the Footsteps of the Ancients: The Origins of Humanism from Lovato to Bruni, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, E. (2020) ‘Sidonius’ vocabulary, syntax, and style’, in Kelly and Van Waarden 2020, 395–417.Google Scholar
Woodruff, H. (1929) ‘The illustrated manuscripts of Prudentius’, Art Studies 7: 33–79.Google Scholar
Wüst, G. (1881) De clausula rhetorica quam praecepit Cicero quatenus in orationibus secutus sit, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2018) Critics, Compilers, and Commentators: An Introduction to Roman Philology, 200 bce–800 ce, New York.Google Scholar