Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:54:24.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - The ICJ and International Dispute Settlement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2023

Edited by
Carlos Espósito  and
Kate Parlett
Carlos Espósito
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Kate Parlett
Affiliation:
Twenty Essex, London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to the International Court of Justice , pp. 121 - 300
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Ago, Roberto, ‘Binding Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice’, 85 American Journal of International Law (1985) 439.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, The International Court of Justice (Hart, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oda, Shigeru, ‘The Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice: A Myth? A Statistical Analysis of Contentious Cases’, 49 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2000) 251.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs FDFA, Directorate of International Law, Handbook on accepting the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice; Model clauses and templates (2014).Google Scholar
Tomka, Peter, ‘The Special Agreement’, in Nisuke, A., McWhinney, E., Rüdiger, W. (eds), Liber Amicorum, Judge Shigeru Oda, Vol. 1 (Brill, 2002) 553.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Daniele, L., Le misure cautelari nel processo dinanzi alla Corte internazionale di giustizia (Giuffrè, 1993).Google Scholar
Gemalmaz, M. S., Provisional Measures of Protection in International Law: 1907–2010 (Legal Kitapevi, 2011).Google Scholar
Miles, C., Provisional Measures Before International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Rosenne, S., Provisional Measures in International Law: The International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Sztucki, J., Interim Measures in the Hague Court (Deventer, 1983).Google Scholar

Further Reading

d’Aspremont, J., ‘What Was Not Meant to Be: General Principles of Law As a Source of International Law’, in Pisillo Mazzeschi, R. and De Sena, P. (eds.), Global Justice, Human Rights, and the Modernization of International Law (Springer, 2018) 163.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J., ‘The Four Lives of Customary International Law’, 21 International Community Law Review (2019) 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M., ‘The History of Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice: The Journey from the Past to the Present’, in Besson, S. and d’Aspremont, J., Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2017), p. 179.Google Scholar
Tams, C., ‘Meta-Custom and the Court: A Study in Judicial Law-Making’ 14 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2015) 51.Google Scholar
Tomka, P., ‘Custom and the International Court of Justice’, 12(2) The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2013) 195.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Benzing, M., ‘Evidentiary Issues’ in Zimmermann, A. et al. (eds.) The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2019) 1377.Google Scholar
Devaney, J. G., Fact-Finding before the International Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Devaney, J. G. ‘Reappraising the Role of Experts in Recent Cases before the International Court of Justice’, Germ Yearrbook Intl L 62 (2019) 337.Google Scholar
Del Mar, K., ‘The International Court of Justice and Standards of Proof’, in Bannelier, et al. (eds.), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law (Routledge, 2012) 99.Google Scholar
Kolb, R., ‘General Principles of Procedural Law’, in Zimmermann, A. et al. (ed.) The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2019) 977.Google Scholar
Malintoppi, L., ‘Fact Finding and Evidence before the International Court of Justice (Notably in Scientific-Related Disputes)’ 9 JIDS (2018) 421.Google Scholar
Mbengue, M., ‘International Courts and Tribunals as Fact-Finders: The Case of Scientific Fact-Finding in International Adjudication’ 34 Loy. L. A. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev (2012) 53–80 at 53–54.Google Scholar
Parlett, K., ‘Parties’ Engagement with Experts in International Litigation’ 9 JIDS (2018) 440.Google Scholar
Peat, D., ‘The Use of Court: Appointed Experts by the International Court of Justice’ 84 BYBIL (2014) 271.Google Scholar
Plant, B., ‘Expert Evidence and the Challenge of Procedural Reform in International Dispute Settlement’ 9 JIDS (2018) 464.Google Scholar
Riddell, A. and Plant, B., Evidence before the International Court of Justice (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2009).Google Scholar

Further Reading

Hernández, G., The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Mettraux, G., International Crimes: Law and Practice Volume I: Genocide (Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Pulkowski, D., The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Stewart, D. P., ‘The Emergent Right to Consular Notification, Access and Assistance’ in Von Arnauld, A., Von der Decken, K., and Susi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (Cambridge University Press, 2020), p. 439Google Scholar
Webb, P., International Integration and Fragmentation (Oxford University Press 2013, paperback 2015)Google Scholar

Further Reading

International Law Association Committee on the Procedure of International Courts and Tribunals, ‘Preliminary Report’, 17 January 2017, Section II.Google Scholar
Miron, A., ‘Working Methods of the Court’ 7(2) JIDS (2016) 371.Google Scholar
Pinzauti, G. and Webb, P., ‘Litigation before the International Court of Justice during the Pandemic’ 34(4) LJIL (2021) 787.Google Scholar
Quintana, J. J., Litigation at the International Court of Justice: Practice and Procedure (Brill Nijhoff, 2015).Google Scholar
Ugalde, S. and Quintana, J. J., ‘Managing Litigation before the International Court of Justice’ 9(4) JIDS (2018) 691.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Higgins, R., ‘Respecting Sovereign States and Running a Tight Courtroom’ 50 ICLQ (2001) 121.Google Scholar
Miles, C., Provisional Measures before International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Miron, A., ‘The Working Methods of the Court’ 7 JIDS (2016) 371.Google Scholar
Parlett, K. and Sander, A. ‘Into the void: a counsel perspective on the need to articulate rules concerning disclosure before the ICJ’, 113 AJIL Unbound (2019) 302.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Crawford, J., ‘Advocacy before International Tribunals in State-to-State cases’, in Bishop, D. and Kehoe, E. G. (eds), The Art of Advocacy in International Arbitration (2nd edn, Juris, 2010) 303.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. and Pellet, A., ‘Anglo Saxon and Continental Approaches to Pleading Before the ICJ; Aspects des modes continentaux et Anglo-Saxons de plaidoiries devant la C.I.J.’ in Buffard, I. et al. (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation, Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Martinus Nijhoff, 2008) 831.Google Scholar
Landau, T., ‘Dysfunctional Deliberations and Effective Advocacy’, in Menaker, A. (ed.), International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity, ICCA Congress Series, Volume 19 (Kluwer, 2017) 285.Google Scholar
Wood, M. and Sthoeger, E., ‘The International Bar’ in Romano, C. P. R., Alter, K. J. and Shany, Y. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2014) 639.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×