Bibliography

doi:10.1017/9781108778923.018

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 February 2023

Edited by

Keegan Francis Callanan and

Sharon Ruth Krause

Show author details

Keegan Francis Callanan: Affiliation:
Middlebury College, Vermont
Sharon Ruth Krause: Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Companion to Montesquieu , pp. 307 - 328

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108778923.018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, John. The Adams-Jefferson Letters, ed. Cappon, Lester J.. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Albertone, Manuela. “Thomas Jefferson and French Economic Thought.” In Rethinking the Atlantic World: Europe and America in the Age of Democratic Revolutions, ed. Albertone, Manuela and De Francesco, Antonio. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009: 123–46.Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. Montesquieu, la politique et l’histoire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1959.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Le Livre des Politiques d’Aristote. Trans. Oresme, Nicole, 1374.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Les Politiques d’Aristote. Trans. Le Roy, Loys, 1568.Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond. Les étapes de la pensée sociologique. Paris: Gallimard, 1967.Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond. Main Currents in Sociological Thought. London: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar

Baker, Keith. Inventing the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Barbon, Nicolas. A Discourse of Trade. London: Thomas Milbourn, 1690.Google Scholar

Barrera, Guillaume. “Malebranche.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar

Barrière, Pierre. Un grand provincial: Charles-Louis de Secondat baron de la Brède et de Montesquieu. Bordeaux: Delmas, 1946.Google Scholar

Bart, Jean. “Montesquieu et l’unification du droit.” In Le temps de Montesquieu: actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 Octobre 1998), ed. Porret, Michel and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002: 137–46.Google Scholar

Bartlett, Robert. The Idea of Enlightenment: A Postmortem Study. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Bates, David William. States of War: Enlightenment Origins of the Political. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Becker, Carl L. The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1932.Google Scholar

Bell, David. The Cult of the Nation in France: Inventing Nationalism, 1680–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Benrekassa, Georges. “Le problème des sources dans les Considérations: questions de méthode.” In Storia e ragione, ed. Postigliola, Alberto. Naples: Liguori, 1987: 33–46.Google Scholar

Benrekassa, Georges. “Freedom.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. “Montesquieu.” In Against the Current, ed. Hardy, Henry. London: Random House, 1979: 164–203.Google Scholar

Berry, Christopher J. The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Beyer, Charles-Jacques. “Montesquieu et la censure religieuse de L’Esprit des lois.” Revue des sciences humaines 70 (1953): 105–131.Google Scholar

Blaufarb, Rafe. The Great Demarcation: The French Revolution and the Invention of Modern Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Lorenzo. “Histoire et nature: la religion dans l’Esprit des Lois.” In Le temps de Montesquieu: actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 Octobre 1998), ed. Porret, Michael and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002: 289–304.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Lorenzo. “Modération non sans tentations radicales: le cas de Montesquieu.” In Lumières radicales et le politique, ed. García-Alonso, Marta. Paris: Champion, 2017: 342–54.Google Scholar

Binoche, Bertrand. Introduction à “De l’Esprit des lois” de Montesquieu. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1998.Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy. Natural and Necessary Enemies: Anglo-French Relations in the Eighteenth Century. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Blanning, Timothy C. W. The Culture of Power and the Power of Culture: Old Regime Europe 1660–1789. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Blaufarb, Rafe. The Great Demarcation: The French Revolution and the Invention of Modern Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. The Six Bookes of a Commonweale, ed. Douglas McRae, Kenneth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Boulainvilliers, Henri comte de. Histoire de l’ancien gouvernement de la France. Amsterdam: La Haye, 1727.Google Scholar

Boulainvilliers, Henri comte de. Essais sur la noblesse de France, contenant une dissertation sur son origine et abaissement. Amsterdam:1732.Google Scholar

Braun, Theodore. “‘La Chaîne secrète’: A Decade of Interpretations.” French Studies 42, no. 3 (1988): 278–91.Google Scholar

Brewer, Daniel. “Thinking History through Montesquieu.” In Montesquieu and the Spirit of Modernity, ed. Carrithers, David W. and Coleman, Patrick. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2002: 215–33.Google Scholar

Bromwich, David. The Intellectual Life of Edmund Burke. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Brunet, Pierre-Gustave. Fantaisies bibliographiques. Paris: Jules Gay, 1864.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter. The Fabrication of Louis XIV. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Burson, Jeffrey D. Culture of Enlightening: Abbé Claude Yvon and the Entangled Emergence of the Enlightenment. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Callanan, Keegan. Montesquieu’s Liberalism and the Problem of Universal Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Carcassonne, Elie. Montesquieu et le problème de la constitution française au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1927.Google Scholar

Carrese, Paul O. The Cloaking of Power: Montesquieu, Blackstone, and the Rise of Judicial Activism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Carrese, Paul O. Democracy in Moderation: Montesquieu, Tocqueville and Sustainable Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “Introduction.” In Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws: A Compendium of the First English Edition, ed. Wallace Carrithers, David. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977: 3–88.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “Jansenist and Jesuit Censures of The Spirit of Laws.” In Montesquieu, The Spirit of Laws: A Compendium of the First English Edition, ed. Carrithers, David Wallace. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977: 467–68.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “Not So Virtuous Republics: Montesquieu, Venice, and the Theory of Aristocratic Republicanism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 52, no. 2 (1991): 245–68.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “The Enlightenment Science of Society.” In Inventing Human Science: Eighteenth-Century Domains, ed. Rox, Christopher, Porter, Roy and Wokler, Robert. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995: 232–70.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “Democratic and Aristocratic Republics: Ancient and Modern.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 109–58.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “Introduction: An Appreciation of The Spirit of Laws.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on the Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 1–40.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. “Montesquieu and the Liberal Philosophy of Jurisprudence.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 291–334.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W. and Coleman, Patrick, eds. Montesquieu and the Spirit of Modernity. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2002.Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A., eds. Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.Google Scholar

Denis de, Casabianca. “Des objections sans réponses? À propos de la ‘tentation’ matérialiste de Montesquieu dans le Pensées.” Revue Montesquieu 7 (2003–2004): 135–56Google Scholar

Casabianca, Dénis de. “Descartes.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Lyon: ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Boston: Beacon Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Chaussinand-Nogaret, Guy. La noblesse au XVIIIe siècle: De la féodalité aux lumières. Paris: Librairie Hachette, 1976.Google Scholar

Chaussinand-Nogaret, Guy. The French Nobility in the Eighteenth Century: From Feudalism to Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheney, Paul. “Lumières Écossaises.” Dictionnaire Montesquieu [online], ed. Catherine Volpilhac-Auger. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar

Cheney, Paul. Revolutionary Commerce: Globalization and the French Monarchy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Cheney, Paul. “Commerce.” In The Cambridge Companion to the French Enlightenment, ed. Brewer, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014: 44–59.Google Scholar

Churchill, Winston S. Marlborough: His Life and Times. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2002.Google Scholar

Cicero, . On Duties, ed. Griffin, Miriam T. and Atkins, E. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Clark, Henry C. Compass of Society: Commerce and Absolutism in Old-Regime France. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2006.Google Scholar

Claus, Laurence. “Montesquieu’s Mistakes and the True Meaning of Separation.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25, no. 3 (2005): 419–51.Google Scholar

Condorcet, Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat. Réflexions sur l’esclavage des nègres. Neuchatel: 1781.Google Scholar

Condorcet, Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat. Bibliothèque de l’Homme Public. Paris: 1790–2.Google Scholar

Condorcet, Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat. “Observations on the Thirty-First Book.” In Destutt de Tracy, A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu’s Spirit of the Laws, to Which Are Annexed, Observations on the Thirty First Book by the Late M. Condorcet; and Two Letters of Helvetius, on the Merits of the Same Work. Trans. Thomas Jefferson. Philadelphia: William Duane, 1811: 259–60.Google Scholar

Condorcet, Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat. “Essay on the Constitution and Functions of the Provincial Assemblies.” In Selected Writings, ed. Baker, Keith. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976: 84–7.Google Scholar

Conroy, Peter. Montesquieu Revisited. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar

Constant, Benjamin. Constant: Political Writings, ed. Fontana, Biancamaria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Coquery, Natacha. L’Hôtel aristocratique: le marché du luxe à Paris au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 1998.Google Scholar

Cotta, Sergio. “Montesquieu e la libertà política.” In Leggere l’Esprit des lois, Stato, società e storia nel pensiero di Montesquieu, ed. Felice, Domenico. Naples: Liguori, 1998: 103–36.Google Scholar

Courtney, Cecil Patrick. Montesquieu and Burke. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1963.Google Scholar

Courtney, Cecil Patrick. “Montesquieu and the problem of ‘la diversité.’” In Enlightenment Essays in Memory of Robert Shackleton, ed. Barber, Giles and Courtney, C. P.. Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation, 1988.Google Scholar

Courtney, Cecil Patrick. “Montesquieu and Revolution.” In Lectures de Montesquieu: Actes du Colloque de Wolfenbüttel (26–28 octobre 1989), ed. Mass, Edgar and Postigliola, Alberto. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1993: 41–61.Google Scholar

Courtney, Cecil Patrick. “Montesquieu and Natural Law.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 41–68.Google Scholar

Courtney, Cecil Patrick. “L’Esprit des lois dans la perspective d l’histoire du livre (1748–1800).” In Le Temps de Montesquieu: actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 October 1998), ed. Porret, Michael and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002: 43–6.Google Scholar

Courtney, Cecil Patrick. “Morals and Manners in Montesquieu’s Analysis of the British System of Liberty.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca E.. New York: SUNY Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Cox, Iris. Montesquieu and the History of French Laws. Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation, 1983.Google Scholar

Cox, Iris. “Montesquieu and the History of Laws.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 409–30.Google Scholar

Craiutu, Aurelian. A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Crevier, J. B. L. Observations sur le livre de l’Esprit des lois. Paris: Desaint et Saillant, 1764.Google Scholar

Curtis, Michael. Orientalism and Islam: European Thinkers on Oriental Despotism in the Middle East and India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

D’Alembert, Jean Le Rond. “Éloge de M. de le Président de Montesquieu,” in Encylopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts, et des métiers, ed. Denis Diderot and Jean Le Rond d’Alembert. Paris: Briasson, 1751–1772.Google Scholar

Dallmayr, Fred. “Montesquieu’s Persian Letters.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca. Albany: SUNY Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Daudin, Guillaume. Commerce et prospérité: La France au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne, 2005.Google Scholar

Davis, David Brion. The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

de Dijn, Annelien. “On Political Liberty: Montesquieu’s Missing Manuscript.” Political Theory 39, no. 2 (2011): 181–204.Google Scholar

de Dijn, Annelien. French Political Thought from Montesquieu to Tocqueville: Liberty in a Levelled Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

de Dijn, Annelien. “Montesquieu’s Controversial Context: The Spirit of the Laws as a Monarchist Tract.” History of Political Thought 34, no. 1 (2013): 66–8.Google Scholar

de Dijn, Annelien. “Was Montesquieu a Liberal Republican?” The Review of Politics 76, no. 1 (2014): 21–41.Google Scholar

de Dijn, Annelien. Freedom: An Unruly History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

de Senarclens, , Vanessa. Montesquieu, historien de Rome: un tournant pour la réflexion sur le statut de l’histoire au XVIIIe siècle. Geneva: Librarie Droz, 2003.Google Scholar

Derathé, Robert. “Notes.” In De L’esprit des lois, Baron de la Brède et de Montesquieu, 2 vols. Paris: Garneir, 1973.Google Scholar

Desgraves, Louis and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine, eds. Catalogue de la bibliothèque de Montesquieu à La Brède. Naples: Liguori Editore, 1999.Google Scholar

Destutt de Tracy, Antoine Claude. A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu’s Spirit of the Laws, to Which Are Annexed, Observations on the Thirty First Book by the Late M. Condorcet; and Two Letters of Helvetius, on the Merits of the Same Work. Trans. Thomas Jefferson. Philadelphia: William Duane, 1811.Google Scholar

Devellennes, Charles. “D’Holbach radical: contrat social et éthocratie dans la pensée politique du baron.” In Les Lumières radicales et histoire politique, ed. M. García Alonso. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2017.Google Scholar

Dewald, Jonathan. “Rethinking the 1 Percent: The Failure of the Nobility in Old Regime France.” The American Historical Review 124, no. 3 (2019): 911–32.Google Scholar

D’Holbach, Paul-Henri Thiry. Éthocratie, ou Le gouvernement fondé sur la morale. Amsterdam: Chez Marc-Michel Rey, 1776.Google Scholar

Thiry, baron d’Holbach, Henri, Paul. Système sociale, ou principes naturels de la morale et de la politique. Paris: Navu, 1994.Google Scholar

Thiry, baron d’Holbach, Henri, Paul. La politique naturelle. Paris: Fayard, 1998.Google Scholar

Dobie, Madeline. Trading Places: Colonization and Slavery in Eighteenth-Century French Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Dossa, Shiraz. “Liberals and Muslims: Philosophy and Conquest.” Arab Studies Quarterly 37 (2015) : 54–72.Google Scholar

Douglass, Robin. “Montesquieu and Modern Republicanism.” Political Studies 60, no. 3 (2012): 703–19.Google Scholar

Doyle, William. The Aristocracy and Its Enemies in the Age of Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Dubos, Jean-Baptiste. Histoire critique de l’établissement de la monarchie française dans les Gaules, 3 vols. Paris: Osmont, 1734.Google Scholar

Dumont, Louis. “Vers une théorie de la hiérarchie.” In Homo Hierarchicus, Le système des castes et ses implications. Paris: Gallimard, 1979.Google Scholar

de Nemours, Dupont, Samuel, Pierre. “De l’origine et des progrès d’une science nouvelle.” In Collection des principaux économistes, ed. Daire, E.. Paris: Dessaint, 1841.Google Scholar

Ehrard, Jean. “Rome enfin que je hais?” In Storia e ragione, ed. Postigliola, Alberto. Naples: Liguori, 1987: 23–32.Google Scholar

Ehrard, Jean. “L’Encyclopédie et l’esclavage: deux lectures de Montesquieu.” In Enlightenment Essays in Memory of Robert Shackleton, ed. Barber, Giles and Courtney, C. P.. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1988: 121–9.Google Scholar

Ehrard, Jean. L’esprit des mots: Montesquieu en lui-même et parmi les siens. Geneva: Librairie Droz S.A., 1998.Google Scholar

Ellis, Harold A. “Montesquieu’s Modern Politics: The Spirit of the Laws and the Problem of Modern Monarchy in Old Regime France.” History of Political Thought 10, no. 4 (1989): 665–700.Google Scholar

Eltis, David, Lewis, Frank D., and Richardson, David. “Slave Prices, the African Slave Trade, and Productivity in the Caribbean, 1674–1807.” The Economic History Review, New Series 58, no. 4 (2005): 673–700.Google Scholar

Ewald, Johann Ludwig. Über Revolutionen, ihre Quellen und die Mittel dagegen. Berlin: Johann Friedrich Unger, 1792.Google Scholar

Faguet, Emile. Politique comparée de Montesquieu, Rousseau et Voltaire. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1902.Google Scholar

Fénelon, . Moral and Political Writings. Trans. Ryan Patrick Hanley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Fergus, Claudius. Revolutionary Emancipation. Slavery and Abolitionism in the British West Indies. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Adam. An Essay on the History of Civil Society [1767]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall. “Westerners Don’t Understand How Vulnerable Freedom Is.” The Guardian. February 20, 2011. www.theguardian.com/books/2011/feb/20/niall-ferguson-interview-civilization.Google Scholar

Fieldhouse, D. K. The Colonial Empires: A Comparative Survey from the Eighteenth Century. New York: Delacorte Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Frank. “Montesquieu’s Influence on Anti-Slavery Opinion in England.” The Journal of Negro History 18 (1933): 414–25.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fletcher, Frank. Montesquieu and English Politics, 1750–1800. London: Edward Arnold & Co., 1939.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Sécurité, territoire, population: cours au Collège de France (1977–1978), ed. Ewald, François, Fontana, Alessandro, and Senellart, Michel. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil, 2004.Google Scholar

Fox, Edward Whiting. History in Geographical Perspective: The Other France. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1971.Google Scholar

Gaddo, Irene and Tortarola, Edoardo. Secularizzazione e modernità. Rome: Carocci Editore, 2017.Google Scholar

Gay, Peter. The Enlightenment: An Interpretation. Vol. 1. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1995.Google Scholar

Ghachem, Malik. “Montesquieu in the Caribbean: The Colonial Enlightenment between ‘Code Noir’ and ‘Code Civil.’” Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques 25 (1999): 183–210.Google Scholar

Ghervas, Stella. “La réception de L’Esprit des Lois en Russie.” In Le temps des Montesquieu: actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 Octobre 1998), ed. Porret, Michel and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002: : 391–404.Google Scholar

Gilmore, Nathaniel K. “Montesquieu’s Considerations on the State of Europe.” Journal of the History of Ideas 81, no. 3 (2020): 359–79.Google Scholar

Gilmore, Nathaniel and Sullivan, Vickie B.. “Montesquieu’s Teaching on the Dangers of Extreme Corrections: Japan, the Catholic Inquisition, and Moderation in The Spirit of the Laws.” American Political Science Review 111 (2017): 460–70.Google Scholar

Goggi, Gianluigi. De l’Encyclopédie à l’éloquence républicaine. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2013.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Marc, trans. Social and Political Thought of the French Revolution, 1788–1797: An Anthology of Original Texts. New York: Peter Lang, 1997.Google Scholar

Goyard-Fabre, Simone. Montesquieu adversaire de Hobbes. Paris: Lettres modernes, 1980.Google Scholar

Goyard-Fabre, Simone. Montesquieu: la nature, les lois, la liberté. Paris: Presses Universitaires France, 1993.Google Scholar

Grant, Ruth W. John Locke’s Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo. Le Droit de la guerre et de la paix. Amsterdam: Vve P. de Coup, 1724.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace. London: Innys, Manby et al., 1738.Google Scholar

Grouvelle, Philippe-Antoine. De l’autorité de Montesquieu dans la Révolution présente. Paris, 1789.Google Scholar

Gwyn, William B. The Meaning of the Separation of Powers: An Analysis of the Doctrine from its Origin to the Adoption of the United States Constitution. New Orleans: Tulane Studies in Political Science, 1965.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Halliday, Paul. Habeas Corpus: From England to Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander. The Federalist, ed. George W. Carey and James McClellan. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2001.Google Scholar

Hammersley, Rachel. The English Republican Tradition and Eighteenth-Century France. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Hansen, Mogens. “The Mixed Constitution versus the Separation of Powers: Monarchical and Aristocratic Aspects of Modern Democracy.” History of Political Thought 31, no. 3 (2010): 509–31.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Fredrich. Phänomenologie des Geistes. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, [1807] 1952.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Fredrich. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Helvétius, . “Letters of Helvétius, Addressed to President Montesquieu and M. Saurin, on Perusing the Manuscript of The Spirit of Laws.” In A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu’s Spirit of the Laws, to Which Are Annexed, Observations on the Thirty First Book by the Late M. Condorcet; and Two Letters of Helvetius, on the Merits of the Same Work, ed. Destutt, Antoine Claude de Tracy. New York: Burt Franklin, [1811] 1969: 283–92.Google Scholar

Hinsley, Francis Harry. Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, ed. Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar

Hoeckermann, A. “Thomas Thorild, der skandinavische Lessing.” Greifswalder Tageblatt. Sontags-Blatt viii (1883).Google Scholar

Hont, Istvan. “The Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: ‘Contemporary Crisis of the Nation State’ in Historical Perspective.” In Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, ed. Hont, Istvan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005: 447–528.Google Scholar

Hont, Istvan. “The Early Enlightenment Debate on Commerce and Luxury.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Hoquet, Thierry, and Spector, Céline. “Comment lire Montesquieu?” In Lectures de l’Esprit des lois, ed. Hoquet, Thierry and Spector, Céline. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2004: 7–33.Google Scholar

Hulliung, Mark. Montesquieu and the Old Regime. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Hume, David. Political Essays, ed. Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hunting, Claudine. “The Philosophes and Black Slavery: 1748–1765.” Journal of the History of Ideas 39, no. 3 (1978): 405–18.Google Scholar

Imbert, Paul-Henri. Destutt de Tracy, critique de Montesquieu ou De la Liberté en matière de politique. Paris: Nizet, 1974.Google Scholar

Imbruglia, Girolamo. “Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Naples.” In Naples in the Eighteenth Century, ed. Imbruglia, Girolamo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 70–94.Google Scholar

Ippolito, Dario. L’Esprit des droits. Montesquieu et le pouvoir de punir. Lyon: ENS Éditions, 2019.Google Scholar

Irwin, Terence. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan. Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man, 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan. The Enlightenment that Failed. Ideas: Revolution and Democratic Defeat, 1748–1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Jacob, Margaret. The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans. London: Allen and Unwin, 1981.Google Scholar

Jacob, Margaret. The Secular Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Jameson, Russel L. Parsons. Montesquieu et l’esclavage: Étude sur les origines de l’opinion antiesclavagiste en France au VIIIe siècle. New York: Burt Franklin, 1971.Google Scholar

Jaucourt, Louis, chevalier de. “Slavery.” In The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d’Alembert: Collaborative Translation Project, trans. Naomi J. Andrews. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 2012.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas. Writings, ed. Merrill D. Peterson. New York: Viking Presss, 1984.Google Scholar

Jennings, Jeremy. “The Debate about Luxury in Eighteenth-and Nineteenth-Century French Political Thought.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68, no. 1 (2007): 79–105.Google Scholar

Jolly, Claude. “Introduction.” In Antoine Destutt de Tracy, Commentaire sur l’Esprit des lois de Montesquieu. Paris: Vrin, 2016.Google Scholar

Jones, Colin. The Great Nation: France from Louis XV to Napoleon. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Jones, Jr., James, F. “Montesquieu and Jefferson Revisited: Aspects of a Legacy.” The French Review 51, no. 4 (1978): 577–85.Google Scholar

Jones, P. M. The Peasantry in the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Kahan, Alan. Aristocratic Liberalism: The Social and Political Thought of Jacob Burkhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kaiser, Thomas E. “Money, Despotism and Public Opinion in Early Eighteenth-Century France: John Law and the Debate on Royal Credit.” Journal of Modern History 63, no. 1 (1991): 1–28.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. “Louis Le Caron Philosophe.” In Philosophy and Humanism: Renaissance Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. Patrick Mahoney, Edward. Leiden: Brill, 1976: 30–49.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. “‘Second Nature’: The Idea of Custom in European Law, Society, and Culture.” In The Transmission of Culture in Early Modern Europe, ed. Grafton, Anthony and Blair, Ann. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990: 131–72.Google Scholar

Kelly, George. Mortal Politics in Eighteenth-Century France. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Keohane, Nannerl O. Philosophy and the State in France. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kingston, Rebecca E. Montesquieu and the Parlement of Bordeaux. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1996.Google Scholar

Kingston, Rebecca E. “Montesquieu on Religion and the Question of Toleration.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 375–408.Google Scholar

Kingston, Rebecca E. “Religion.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Philip Stewart, ed. Catherine Volpilhac-Auger. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar

Kinneging, Andreas A. M. Aristocracy, Antiquity and History. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar

Kra, Pauline. “La Défense des Lettres persanes.” In Montesquieu, Oeuvre ouverte? (1748–1755): Actes du Colloque de Bordeaux, ed. Catherine Larrère. Oxford, UK: Voltaire Foundation, 2005.Google Scholar

Krause, Sharon R. “The Politics of Distinction and Disobedience: Honor and the Defense of Liberty in Montesquieu.” Polity 31, no. 3 (1999): 469–99.Google Scholar

Krause, Sharon R. “The Spirit of Separate Powers in Montesquieu.” The Review of Politics 62, no. 2 (2000): 231–65.Google Scholar

Krause, Sharon R. “Despotism in The Spirit of Laws.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 231–72.Google Scholar

Krause, Sharon R. Liberalism with Honor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Krause, Sharon R. “Two Concepts of Liberty in Montesquieu.” Perspectives on Political Science 34, no. 2 (2005): 88–96.Google Scholar

Krause, Sharon R. “Freedom, Sovereignty, and the General Will in Montesquieu.” In The General Will. The Evolution of a Concept, ed. Farr, James and Williams, David Lay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 147–74.Google Scholar

La Beaumelle, Laurent Angliviel de. Suite de la défense de l’Esprit des Lois. Amsterdam: 1751.Google Scholar

Lafontant, Julien. Montesquieu et le problème de l’esclavage dans l’Esprit des lois. Sherbrooke, QC: Éditions Naaman, 1979.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “Droit de punir et qualification des crimes de Montesquieu à Beccaria.” In Beccaria et la culture juridique des Lumières, ed. Michel Porret. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1997: 89–108.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “Les typologies des gouvernements chez Montesquieu.” Revue Montesquieu 5 (2001): 157–72.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “Montesquieu: L’Éclipse de la souveraineté.” Penser la souveraineté à l’epoque moderne et contemporaine, ed. Gian Mario Cazzaniga and Yves Charles Zarka. Paris: Vrin, 2001: 199–214.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “Montesquieu on Economics and Commerce.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 335–74.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “Women, Republicanism and the Growth of Commerce.” In Republicanism. A Shared European Heritage, 2 vols., ed. Van Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002: 139–56.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “Montesquieu économiste? Une lecture paradoxale.” In Montesquieu en 2005, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2005: 243–66.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “Montesquieu and Liberalism: The Question of Pluralism.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca. Albany: SUNY Press, 2009: 279–302.Google Scholar

Lauriol, Claude. La Beaumelle: Un Protestant cévenol entre Montesquieu et Voltaire. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1978.Google Scholar

Lauriol, “La Condamnation de L’Esprit des lois dans les archives de la Congrégation de l’Index.” In Montesquieu, Oeuvre ouverte? (1748–1755): Actes du Colloque de Bordeaux, ed. Catherine Larrère. Oxford, UK: Voltaire Foundation, 2005: 91–103.Google Scholar

Lehner, Ulrich. The Catholic Enlightenment: The Forgotten History of a Global Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Levy, Jacob T. “Not So Novus an Ordo: Constitutions without Social Contracts.” Political Theory 37, no. 2 (2009): 191–217.Google Scholar

Levy, Jacob T. “Montesquieu’s Constitutional Legacies.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca. Albany: SUNY Press, 2010: 115–38.Google Scholar

Levy, Jacob T. Rationalism, Pluralism, and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Levy, Jacob T. “The Separation of Powers and the Challenge to Constitutional Democracy.” Review of Constitutional Studies 25 (2020): 1–18.Google Scholar

Linton, Marisa. The Politics of Virtue in Enlightenment France. Houndsmills: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Lowenthal, David. “Introduction.” In Montesquieu, Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and Their Decline, ed. Lowenthal, David. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1999: 1–20.Google Scholar

Lutz, Donald S. “The Relative Influence of European Writers on Late Eighteenth-Century American Political Thought.” American Political Science Review 78, no. 1 (1984): 189–97.Google Scholar

Lynch, Andrew J. “Montesquieu and the Ecclesiastical Critics of l’Esprit des lois.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38, no. 3 (1977): 487–500.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolo. Discourses on Livy. Trans. Harvey Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. B. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Malebranche, Nicolas. The Search after Truth. Trans. Thomas M. Lennon and Paul J. Olscamp. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Maletz, Donald. “Tocqueville on Mores and the Preservation of Republics.” American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 1 (2005): 1–15.Google Scholar

Mandeville, Bernard. The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1988.Google Scholar

Manent, Pierre. The City of Man. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. “Les deux libéralismes: marché ou contre-pouvoirs.” Interventions 9 (1984): 10–24.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. “Montesquieu, la république et le commerce.” European Journal of Sociology, vol. 42, no. 3 (2001): 573–602.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. “Montesquieu et la politique moderne.” In Lectures de l’ Esprit des lois, ed. Spector, Céline and Hoquet, Thierry. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2004: 171–231.Google Scholar

Marshall, John. “Voltaire, Priestcraft and Imposture: Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.” Intellectual History Review 28, no. 1 (2018): 167–84.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. In Marx Engels Werke, vol. 23. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1979.Google Scholar

Mason, Sheila. Montesquieu’s Idea of Justice. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975.Google Scholar

Mass, Edgar. Literatur und Zensur in der frühen Aufklärung: Produktion, Distribution und Rezeption der Lettres persanes. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1981.Google Scholar

Matytsin, Anton. “Reason and Utility in French Religious Apologetics.” In God in the Enlightenment, ed. Bulman, William J. and Ingram, Robert G.. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016: 63–82.Google Scholar

McDaniel, Iain. Adam Ferguson in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Roman Past and Europe’s Future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Merrick, Jeffery W. The Desacralization of the French Monarchy in the Eighteenth Century. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Meyer, Jean. La noblesse française à l’époque moderne (XVIe-XVIIIe siècles). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1991.Google Scholar

Minuti, Rolando. “An Overview: Montesquieu and Islam.” In Studies on Montesquieu: Mapping Political Diversity, ed. Rolando Minuti. Cham: Springer, 2018.Google Scholar

Monnier, Raymonde. “Montesquieu et le langage républicain: l’argumentaire de l’Esprit des lois.” La Révolution française 5 (2013): 1–15.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, baron de la Brède et de. The Spirit of Laws. 2 vols. Trans. Thomas Nugent. London: Nourse and Vaillant, 1750.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Oeuvres complètes de Montesquieu, ed. Caillois, Roger. 2 vols. Paris: Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1949–51.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Oeuvres complètes de Montesquieu, ed. Masson, André. 3 vols. Paris: Les Éditions Nagel, 1950–55.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. L’Esprit des lois, ed. Derathé, Robert. 2 vols. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 1973.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. The Spirit of Laws, A Compendium of the First English Edition, ed. Carrithers, David Wallace. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. The Spirit of the Laws, ed. Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia, and Stone, Harold. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Pensées, Le Spicilège, ed. Desgraves, Louis. Paris: Laffont, 1991.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Oeuvres complètes de Montesquieu, ed. Ehrard, Jean, Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine, et. al. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1998-2008; Lyon and Paris: ENS Éditions and Classiques Garnier, 2010-.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and Their Decline. Trans. David Lowenthal. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1999.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Persian Letters, ed. Kahn, Andrew. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. The Personal and the Political: Three Fables by Montesquieu, ed. Allen, W. B.. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2008.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. My Thoughts, ed. Clark, Henry C.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2012.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Persian Letters, ed. Warner, Stuart D. and Douard, Stéphane. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Lettres persanes, ed. Stewart, Philip and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Lyon: Société Montesquieu and IHRIM (École normale supérieure de Lyon), 2019. http://montesquieu.huma-num.fr/editions/fictions-poesies/lettres-persanes.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Persian Letters, ed. Stewart, Philip. Lyon: École normale supérieure de Lyon, 2019. http://montesquieu.ens-lyon.fr/spip.php?rubrique245.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Discourses, Dissertations, and Dialogues on Politics, Science, and Religion, ed. Carrithers, David W. and Stewart, Philip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Essai sur le goût, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Lyon: Société Montesquieu and IHRIM (École normale supérieure de Lyon), 2020. http://montesquieu.huma-num.fr/editions/oeuvres-historiques-politiques-scientifiques-esthetiques.Google Scholar

Moore, James. “Montesquieu and the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Rebecca, E. Kingston. Albany: SUNY Press, 2009: 179–98.Google Scholar

Morineau, Michel. “Budgets de l’État et gestion des finances royales en France au dix-huitième siècle.” Revue historique 264 (1980): 289–336.Google Scholar

Morrissey, Robert. The Economy of Glory: From Ancien Régime France to the Fall of Napoleon. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Mosher, Michael A. “The Judgmental Gaze of European Women: Gender, Sexuality, and the Critique of Republican Rule.” Political Theory 22, no. 1 (1994): 25–44.Google Scholar

Mosher, Michael A. “Monarchy’s Paradox: Honor in the Face of Sovereign Power.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 159–230.Google Scholar

Mosher, Michael A. “Free Trade, Free Speech, and Free Love: Monarchy from the Liberal Prospect in Mid-eighteenth-Century France.” In Monarchisms in the Age of the Enlightenment: Liberty, Patriotism, and the Common Good, ed. Blom, Hans, Laursen, John Christian and Simonutti, Luisa. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007: 101–18.Google Scholar

Mosher, Michael A. “Perfection Does Not Concern Men or Things Universally.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca. Albany: SUNY Press, 2010: 7–30.Google Scholar

Mosher, Michael A. “Montesquieu on Empire and Enlightenment.” In Empire and Modern Political Thought, ed. Muthu, Sankar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 112–54.Google Scholar

Murphy, Antoin E. John Law, : Economic Theorist and Policy-Maker. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Murphy, Antoin E. John Law, “John Law et la bulle de la Compagnie du Mississippi,” L’Economie politique 48, no. 4 (2010): 7–22.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric. The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Offen, Karen. The Woman Question in France, 1400–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Orain, Arnaud. La politique du merveilleux: une autre histoire du Système de Law (1695–1795). Paris: Fayard, 2018.Google Scholar

Orwin, Clifford. “‘For Which Human Nature Can Never Be Too Grateful’: Montesquieu as the Heir of Christianity.” In Recovering Reason: Essays in Honor of Thomas L. Pangle, ed. Burns, Timothy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010: 269–82.Google Scholar

Oudin, Charles. Le Spinozisme de Montesquieu: étude critique. Paris: 1911.Google Scholar

Ozouf, Mona. “La Révolution française et la formation de l’homme nouveau.” In L’Homme régénéré: essais sur la Révolution française. Paris: Gallimard, 1989.Google Scholar

Pangle, Thomas. Montesquieu’s Philosophy of Liberalism: A Commentary on The Spirit of the Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Pangle, Thomas. The Theological Basis of Liberal Modernity in Montesquieu’s “Spirit of the Laws.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Parekh, Bhikhu. “Vico and Montesquieu: Limits of Pluralist Imagination.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 25 (1999): 55–78.Google Scholar

Pascal, Blaise. “Prière pour demander á Dieu le bon usage des maladies.” In Oeuvres complètes, 3 vols. Paris: Hachette, 1881: 2:28–34.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Pocock, John G. A. “Commerce, Credit, and Sovereignty: The Nation-State as Historical Critique.” In Markets, Morals, Politics: Jealousy of Trade and the History of Political Thought, ed. Kapossy, Béla, Nakhimovsky, Issac, Reinert, Sophua A., and Whatmore, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018: 265–84.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam and Jose Maria, Maravall, eds. Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel von. De officio hominis et civis juxta legem naturalem libri duo. Lund: Junghans, 1673.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel von. Le Droit de la nature et des gens. Amsterdam: Vve P. de Coup, 1734.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel von. Of the Law of Nature and Nations, 5th ed. London: 1749.Google Scholar

Quesnay, François. “Despotisme de la Chine.” In Oeuvres économiques complètes et autres textes, ed. Théré, Christine, Charles, Loïc, and Perrot, Jean-Claude. Paris: INED, 2005: 1005–14.Google Scholar

Radasanu, Andrea. “Montesquieu on Moderation, Monarchy and Reform.” History of Political Thought 31, no. 2 (2010): 283–308.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul. Republics Ancient and Modern: Classical Republicanism and the American Revolution. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul. “Forms of Government: Structure, Principle, Object, and Aim.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 69–108.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul. “‘The Book That Never Was’: Montesquieu’s Considerations on the Romans in Historical Context.” History of Political Thought 26, no. 1 (2005): 43–89.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul. Montesquieu and the Logic of Liberty. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul. Soft Despotism: Democracy’s Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville and the Modern Prospect. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul. “Was Montesquieu a Philosopher of History?” In Montesquieu et les philosophies de l’histoire au XVIIIe siècle, ed. Bianchi, Lorenzo and Minuti, Rolando. Naples: Liguori Editore, 2013: 71–86.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul. “Carthage Can Now Defeat Rome: Political Order, Seaborne Commerce, and the Projection of Power in Barbon and Montesquieu,” in Applied History and Contemporary Policymaking: School of Statecraft, ed. Robert Crowcroft (London: Bloomsbury, 2022): 53–66.Google Scholar

Rancière, Jacques. La haine de la démocratie. Paris: La fabrique éditions, 2005.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Dennis C. The Pragmatic Enlightenment: Recovering the Liberalism of Hume, Smith, Montesquieu, and Voltaire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Rétat, Pierre. “De Mandeville à Montesquieu: honneur, luxe et dépense noble dans L’Esprit des lois.” Studi francesi 50 (1973): 238–49.Google Scholar

Revel, Jacques. “The Uses of Comparison: Religions in the Early Eighteenth Century.” In Bernard Picart and the First Global Vision of Religion, ed. Hunt, Lynn, Jacob, Margaret C., and Mijnhardt, Wijnand. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2010: 331–47.Google Scholar

Richter, Melvin. “Comparative Political Analysis in Montesquieu and Tocqueville.” Comparative Politics 1 (1969): 129–60.Google Scholar

Richter, Melvin. Political Theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Riley, Patrick. The Philosophers’ Philosophy of Law from the Seventeenth Century to Our Days. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.Google Scholar

Roberts, Jennifer Tolbert. Athens on Trial: The Antidemocratic Tradition in Western Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Romani, Roberto. “All Montesquieu’s Sons: The Place of Esprit Général, Caractère National, and Mœurs in French Political Philosophy, 1748–1789,” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 362 (1998): 189–235.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le siècle du populisme. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2020.Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, Helena. “The Christian Enlightenment.” In The Cambridge History of Christianity, vol. 7: Enlightenment, Reawakening and Revolution, 1600–1815, ed. Stewart J. Brown and Timothy Tackett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Rosso, Corrado. Montesquieu moraliste, des lois au bonheur. Bordeaux: Ducros, 1971.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Basic Political Writings. Trans. Donald A. Cress. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Discourse on Political Economy and The Social Contract. Trans. Christopher Betts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Rush, Benjamin. An Address to the Inhabitants of the British Settlements in America, upon Slave-Keeping. Philadelphia: John Dunlop, 1773.Google Scholar

Sabine, George H. A History of Political Theory, 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rineart, and Winston, 1961.Google Scholar

Sagar, Paul. The Opinion of Mankind: Sociability and the Theory of the State from Hobbes to Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Sala-Molins, Louis. Dark Side of the Light: Slavery and the French Enlightenment. Trans. John Conteh-Morgan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2005.Google Scholar

Salkever, Stephen. “Aristotle’s Social Science.” In Aristotle’s Politics: Critical Essays, ed. Kraut, Richard and Skultety, Steven. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005: 27–64.Google Scholar

Samuel, Ana. “The Design of Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws: The Triumph of Freedom over Determinism.” American Political Science Review 103, no. 2 (2009): 305–21.Google Scholar

Schaub, Diana. Erotic Liberalism: Women and Revolution in Montesquieu’s Persian Letters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1995.Google Scholar

Schaub, Diana. “Of Believers and Barbarians: Montesquieu’s Enlightened Toleration.” In Early Modern Skepticism and the Origins of Toleration, ed. Levine, Alan. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1999: 225–48.Google Scholar

Schaub, Diana. “The Regime and Montesquieu’s Principles of Education.” In Montesquieu and the Spirit of Modernity, ed. Carrithers, David W. and Coleman, Patrick. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2002: 77–100.Google Scholar

Schaub, Diana. “Montesquieu on Slavery.” Perspectives on Political Science 34 (2005), 70–8.Google Scholar

Schaub, Diana. “The Education of the Sentiments in Montesquieu’s The Temple of Gnidus.” In The Arts of Rule: Essays in Honor of Harvey C. Mansfield, ed. Krause, Sharon and Ann McGrail, Mary. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2009: 125–46.Google Scholar

Schiffman, Zachary S. The Birth of the Past. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology, ed. George Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Schneider, Jean-Paul. “Les Jeux du sens dans les Lettres persanes: temps du roman et temps de l’histoire.” Revue Montesquieu 4 (2000): 127–59.Google Scholar

Schneider, Jean-Paul. “Les Lettres persanes, trente ans après,” in Montesquieu, Oeuvre ouverte? (1748–1755): Actes du Colloque de Bordeaux, ed. Catherine Larrère. Oxford, UK: Voltaire Foundation, 2005.Google Scholar

Seeber, Edward Derbyshire. Anti-Slavery Opinion in France during the Second Half of the Eighteenth Century. New York: Greenwood Press, 1937.Google Scholar

SewellJr., William H. “The Empire of Fashion and the Rise of Capitalism in Eighteenth-Century France.” Past and Present 206, no. 1 (2010): 81–120.Google Scholar

Shackleton, Robert. “La genèse de L’Esprit des lois.” Revue d’histoire littéraire de la France 52 (1952): 425–38.Google Scholar

Shackleton, Robert. Montesquieu: A Critical Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Shackleton, Robert. “La religion de Montesquieu.” In Essays on Montesquieu and on the Enlightenment, ed. Gilson, David and Smith, Martin. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1988: 109–16.Google Scholar

Sharp, Granville. A Representation of the Injustice and Dangerous Tendency of Tolerating Slavery; or of Admitting the Least Claim of Private Property in the Persons of Men, in England. London: Crukshank, 1769.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. Montesquieu. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. “The Liberalism of Fear.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenblum, Nancy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989: 149–66.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. “Montesquieu and the New Republicanism.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 265–80.Google Scholar

Shovlin, John. The Political Economy of Virtue: Luxury, Patriotism and the Origins of the French Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought: Volume 2, The Age of Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “The Sovereign State: A Genealogy.” In Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present, and Future of a Contested Concept, ed. Kalmo, Hent and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010: 26–46.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. R. H. Campbell, Skinner, Andrew S., and Todd, William B.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Smith, Jay. Nobility Reimagined: The Patriotic Nation in Eighteenth-Century France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Sonenscher, Michael. Before the Deluge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Sonenscher, Michael. Sans-Culottes: An Eighteenth-Century Emblem in the French Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Sonenscher, Michael. Work and Wages: Natural Law, Politics and the Eighteenth-Century French Trades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Sorkin, David. The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Vices privés, vertus publiques: de La Fable des abeilles à L’Esprit des lois.” In Montesquieu and the Spirit of Modernity, ed. Carrithers, David W. and Coleman, Patrick. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2002: 127–57.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Montesquieu: Critique of republicanism?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6, no. 1 (2003): 38–53.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Montesquieu et les infortunes de la vertu.” Esprit 402 (2004): 31–44.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. Montesquieu: pouvoirs, richesses, et sociétés. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2004.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. Montesquieu et l’émergence de l’économie politique. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2006.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Naturalisation des croyances, religion naturelle et histoire naturelle de la religion: le statut du fait religieux dans L’Esprit des lois.” In Montesquieu, l’État et la Religion: Actes du colloque de Sofia, 6–8 Octobre 2005, ed. Ehrard, Jean. Sofia: Éditions Iztok-Zapad, 2007: 40–78.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. Montesquieu, Liberté, droit et histoire. Paris: Michalon, 2010.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Was Montesquieu Liberal? The Spirit of the Laws in the History of Liberalism.” In French Liberalism from Montesquieu to the Present Day, ed. Geenens, Raf and Rosenblatt, Helena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 57–72.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Corruption.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar

Spector, Céline. “Bâtir Chalcédoine, le rivage de Byzance devant les yeux: Oceana, de Harrington à Montesquieu.” In Harrington et le républicanisme à l’âge classique, ed. Gracianette, Bernard, Miqueu, Cristophe and Terrel, Jean. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2014: 131–48.Google Scholar

Spurlin, Paul Merrill. Montesquieu in America, 1760–1801. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1940.Google Scholar

Stafford, James. “International Relations: Power, Peace, and the People.” In A Cultural History of Democracy in the Age of Enlightenment, ed. Mosher, Michael and Plassart, Anna. London: Bloomsbury, 2021: 201–17.Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean. “Préface.” In Les Lettres persanes en leur temps, ed. Philip Stewart. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2013: 29–42.Google Scholar

Steiner, Philippe. “Commerce, Commerce Politique.” In Commerce, Population et Société Autour de Vincent Gournay (1748–1758), ed. Charles, Loïc and Théré, Christine. Paris: INED, 2009.Google Scholar

Stewart, Philip. “Toujours Usbek.” Eighteenth Century Fiction 11, no. 2 (1999): 141–50.Google Scholar

Stewart, Philip. “Les émigrés.” In Les Lettres persanes en leur temps, ed. Stewart, Philip. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2013: 29–42.Google Scholar

Stewart, Philip. “Persian Letters.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar

Stewart, William. “Montesquieu vu par les Anglais depuis deux siècles.” In Actes du congrès Montesquieu réuni à Bordeaux du 23 au 26 Mai 1955. Bordeaux: Impriméries Delmas, 1956.Google Scholar

Stillman, Peter G. “Hegel’s Civil Society: A Locus of Freedom.” Polity 12, no. 4 (1980): 622–46.Google Scholar

Straumann, Benjamin. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Strugnell, Anthony. Diderot’s Politics. The Hague: Springer, 1973.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Vickie B. Montesquieu and the Despotic Ideas of Europe: An Interpretation of The Spirit of the Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. Hegel and Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Terrel, Jean. “Sovereignty.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar

Thorild, Thomas. “Critik over Montesquieu.” In Samlade Skrifter, ed. Arvidson, Stellan. Stockholm: 1933: 2:279–85.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Trans. George Lawrence, ed. Mayer, J. P.. New York: Harper Perennial, 2006.Google Scholar

Trescher, Hildegard. Montesquieus Einfluss auf die philosophischen Grundlagen der Staatslehre Hegels. PhD dissertation. University of Leipzig, 1917.Google Scholar

Trivellato, Francesca. The Promise and Peril of Credit: What a Forgotten Legend about Jews and Finance Tells Us about the Making of European Commercial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Turnbull, Gordon. An Apology for Negro Slavery: Or the West-India Planters Vindicated from the Charge of Inhumanity. London: 1786.Google Scholar

Vantuch, Anton. “Réflexions sur la monarchie universelle: Montesquieu et ses velléités de carrière diplomatique.” Acta Universitatis XVII, Novembris Pragensis Bulletin (1974): 177–221.Google Scholar

Vaughan, C. E. Studies in the History of Political Philosophy Before and After Rousseau, 2 vols. New York: Russell & Russell, 1960.Google Scholar

Velde, François R. “John Law’s System.” The American Economic Review 97, no. 2 (2007): 276–9.Google Scholar

Vile, M. J. C. Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Villa, Dana. “Hegel, Tocqueville, and Individualism.” The Review of Politics 67, no. 4, (2005): 657–86.Google Scholar

Villaverde Rico, Maria José. “L’Abbé Raynal, philosophe radical.” In Les Lumières radicales et le politique, ed. García-Alons, Marta. Paris: Champion, 2017: 229–61.Google Scholar

Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. “Une modération radicale? Montesquieu.” In Qu’est-ce que les Lumières radicales? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l’âge classique, ed. Secrétan, Catherine, Dagron, Triston and Bove, Laurent. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam 2007: 389–98.Google Scholar

Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Un auteur en quête d’éditeurs? Histoire éditoriale de l’œuvre de Montesquieu (1748–1964). Lyon: ENS Éditions, 2011.Google Scholar

Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar

Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. “Vernet, Jacob.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar

Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Bibliothèque virtuelle Montesquieu. Lyon: École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 2016. http://montesquieu.huma-num.fr/bibliotheque/introduction.Google Scholar

Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Montesquieu. Paris: Gallimard, 2017.Google Scholar

Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Montesquieu: une histoire de temps. Lyon: ENS Éditions, 2017.Google Scholar

Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Montesquieu: Let There Be Enlightenment. Trans. Stewart, Philip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Voltaire, . Épitre à l’auteur du livre des Trois Imposteurs. In Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire, vol. 10, ed. Moland, Louis. Paris: Garnier, 1877–85: 402–5.Google Scholar

Voltaire, . Pensées sur le gouvernement. In Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire, vol. 23, ed. Moland, Louis. Paris: Garnier, 1877–85.Google Scholar

Voltaire, . “The A B C, or Dialogues between A B C, translated from the English by Mr Huet.” In Political Writings, ed. David Willams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 85–6.Google Scholar

Vyverberg, Henry. Human Nature, Cultural Diversity, and the French Enlightenment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Waddicor, Mark. Montesquieu and the Philosophy of Natural Law. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1970.Google Scholar

Ward, Lee. “Montesquieu on Federalism and Anglo-Gothic Constitutionalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 37, no. 4 (2007): 551–77.Google Scholar

Watts, David. The West Indies: Patterns of Development, Culture, and Environmental Change Since 1492. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Weil, Françoise. “Montesquieu et le despotisme.” Actes du congrès Montesquieu. Bordeaux: Delmas, 1956: 191–215.Google Scholar

Williams, David Lay. Condorcet and Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Williams, David Lay. “Political Ontology and Institutional Design in Montesquieu and Rousseau.” American Journal of Political Science 54, no. 2 (2010): 525–42.Google Scholar

Williams, David Lay. “Spinoza and the General Will.” In The General Will: The Evolution of a Concept, ed. Farr, James and Lay Williams, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 115–46.Google Scholar

Wilson, A. M. Diderot. New York: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Winock, Michel. “La Démocratie.” In La France républicaine. Paris: Robert Laffont, 2017.Google Scholar

Winterer, Caroline. American Enlightenments: Pursuing Happiness in the Age of Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon. The Presence of the Past: Essays on the State and the Constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Wolloch, Nathaniel. History and Nature in the Enlightenment: Praise of the Mastery of Nature in Eighteenth-Century Historical Literature. London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Wong, R. Bin. “Taxation and Good Governance in China, 1500–1914.” In The Rise of Fiscal States: A Global History, 1500–1914, ed. Yuh-Casalilla, Bartolomé and O’Brien, Patrick F.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 353–77.Google Scholar

Wright, Johnson. “A Rhetoric of Aristocratic Reaction? Nobility in De l’Esprit des Lois.” In The French Nobility in the Eighteenth Century: Reassessments and New Approaches, ed. Smith, Jay M.. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2006: 227–51.Google Scholar

Wright, Johnson“Montesquieuean Moments: The Spirit of the Laws and Republicanism.” Journal of the Western Society for French History 35 (2007): 149–69.Google Scholar

Yack, Bernard. Longing for Total Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Zaretsky, Robert. Catherine and Diderot. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive