Policy Responses

Abazaj, J., Moen, Ø., & Ruud, A. (2016). Striking the balance between renewable energy generation and water status protection: hydropower in the context of the European Renewable Energy Directive and Water Framework Directive. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26 (5), 409–21.Google Scholar

Adelle, C., & Russel, D. (2013). Climate policy integration: A case of déjà vu? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23 (1), 1–12.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alons, G. (2017), Environmental policy integration in the EU’s common agricultural policy: Greening or greenwashing? Journal of European Public Policy, 24 (11), 1–19.Google Scholar

Ansong, J., Gissi, E., & Calado, H. (2017). An approach to ecosystem-based management in maritime spatial planning process. Ocean and Coastal Management, 141, 65–81.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., Davies, O., & van der Grijp, N. (2009). Environmental policy integration and the architecture of global environmental governance. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 351–69.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bizikova, L., Metternicht, G., & Yarde, T. (2018). Environmental mainstreaming and policy coherence: Essential policy tools to link international agreements with national development. A case study of the Caribbean region. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20 (3), 975–95.Google Scholar

Brendehaug, E., Aall, C., & Dodds, R. (2016). Environmental policy integration as a strategy for sustainable tourism planning: Issues in implementation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25 (9), 1257–74.Google Scholar

Buizer, M., Arts, B., & Westerink, J. (2016). Landscape governance as policy integration ‘from below’: A case of displaced and contained political conflict in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34 (3), 448–62.Google Scholar

Dyrhauge, H. (2014). The road to environmental policy integration is paved with obstacles: Intra- and inter-organizational conflicts in EU transport decision-making. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52 (5), 985–1001.Google Scholar

Dunlop, C. A., Maggetti, M., Radaelli, C. M., & Russel, D. (2012). The many uses of regulatory impact assessment: A meta-analysis of EU and UK cases. Regulation and Governance, 6, 23–45.Google Scholar

Dupont, C., & Oberthür, S. (2012). Insufficient Climate Policy Integration in EU energy policy: The importance of the long-term perspective. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 8 (2), 228–47.Google Scholar

European Commission (2016). Environmental integration. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/integration.htm. Accessed: 17 June 2019.Google Scholar

European Environment Agency (2005). Environmental policy integration in Europe: Administrative culture and practices. Available at: www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/Ann1120649962. Accessed: 17 June 2019.Google Scholar

Fertel, C., Bahn, O., Vaillancourt, K., & Waaub, J.-P. (2013). Canadian energy and climate policies: A SWOT analysis in search of federal/provincial coherence. Energy Policy, 63, 1139–50.Google Scholar

Geeraert, A. (2016). It’s not that easy being green: The environmental dimension of the European Union’s sports policy. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 40 (1), 62–81.Google Scholar

Giordano, T. (2014). Multi-level integrated planning and greening of public infrastructure in South Africa. Planning Theory and Practice, 15 (4), 480–504.Google Scholar

Goria, A., Sgobbi, A., & Von Homeyer, I. (2010) (eds.). Governance for the environment: A comparative analysis of environmental policy integration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hertin, J., & Berkhout, F. (2003). Analysing institutional strategies for environmental policy integration: The case of EU enterprise policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5 (1), 39–56.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hogl, K., Kvarda, E., Nordbeck, R., & Pregernig, M. (2012). Effectiveness and legitimacy of environmental governance synopsis of key insights. In Hogl, K, Kvarda, E, Nordbeck, R, & Pregernig, M (eds.), Environmental governance: The challenge of legitimacy and effectiveness (pp. 280–304). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Huttunen, S. (2015). Farming practices and experienced policy coherence in agri-environmental policies: The case of land clearing in Finland. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 17 (6), 573–92.Google Scholar

International Council for Science (2017). A guide to SDG interactions: from science to implementation. Paris: International Council for Science.Google Scholar

Jacob, K., Volkery, A., & Lenschow, A. (2008). Instruments for environmental policy integration in 30 OECD countries. In Jordan, A & Lenschow, A (eds.), Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability (pp. 24–45). Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar

Jordan, A. J., & Lenschow, A. (2008). Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2000), ‘Greening’ the European Union: What can be learned from the ‘leaders’ of EU environmental policy? European Environment, 10 (3), 109–210.Google Scholar

Jordan, A., Schout, A., & Unfried, M. (2008). The European Union. In Jordan, A, & Lenschow, A (eds.), Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability (pp. 159–79). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20, 147–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kalaba, F. K., Quinn, C. H., & Dougill, A. J. (2014). Policy coherence and interplay between Zambia’s forest, energy, agricultural and climate change policies and multilateral environmental agreements. International Environmental Agreements, 14 (2), 181–98.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (2017) (eds.). Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kivimaa, P., & Mickwitz, P. (2006). The challenge of greening technologies: Environmental policy integration in Finnish technology policies. Research Policy, 35 (5), 729–44.Google Scholar

Knudsen, J. K., & Lafferty, W. M. (2016). Environmental policy integration: The importance of balance and trade-offs. In Fisher, D (ed.), Research handbook on fundamental concepts in environmental law (pp. 337–68). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Lafferty, W. M., & Hovden, E. (2003). Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12 (3), 1–22.Google Scholar

Lafferty, W. M. (ed.) (2004). Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lafferty, W. M., Knudsen, J., & Larsen, O. M. (2007). Pursuing sustainable development in Norway: The challenge of living up to Brundtland at home. European Environment, 17 (3), 177–88.Google Scholar

Lenschow, A. (1997). Variation in EC environmental policy integration: Agency push within complex institutional structures. Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (1), 109–27.Google Scholar

Lenschow, A. (2002). Greening the European Union: An introduction. In Lenschow, A (ed.), Environmental policy integration: Greening sectoral policies in Europe (pp. 3–21). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

McCauley, D. (2015). Sustainable development in energy policy: A governance assessment of environmental stakeholder inclusion in waste-to-energy. Sustainable Development, 23 (5), 273–84.Google Scholar

Meadowcroft, J., Langhelle, O., & Ruud, A. (eds.) (2012). Governance, democracy and sustainable development: Moving beyond the impasse. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Meadowcroft, J., & Fiorino, D. J. (eds.) (2017). Conceptual innovation in environmental policy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mickwitz, P., Aix, F., Beck, S. et al. (2009). Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. Helsinki: Partnership for European Environmental Research.Google Scholar

Mullally, G., & Dunphy, N. P. (2015). State of play review of environmental policy integration literature. Dublin: National Economic and Social Council.Google Scholar

Negev, M. (2016). Interagency aspects of environmental policy: The case of environmental health. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26 (3), 205–19.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M. (2005). Learning, frames and environmental policy integration: The case of Swedish energy policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23 (2), 207–26.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M. Eklund, M., & Tyskeng, S. (2009). Environmental integration and policy implementation: Competing governance modes in waste management decision making. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27 (1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M., & Persson, Å. (2017). Policy note: Lessons from environmental policy integration for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Environmental Science and Policy, 78, 36–39.Google Scholar

Nunan, F., Campbell, A., & Foster, E. (2012). Environmental mainstreaming: The organisational challenges of policy integration. Public Administration and Development, 32 (3), 262–77.Google Scholar

Oberthür, S. (2009). Interplay management: Enhancing environmental policy integration among international institutions. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 371–91.Google Scholar

Ortolano, L., & Shepherd, A. (1995). Environmental impact assessment: Challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment, 13 (1), 3–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Park, M. S., & Youn, Y.-C. (2017). Reforestation policy integration by the multiple sectors toward forest transition in the Republic of Korea. Forest Policy and Economics, 76, 45–55.Google Scholar

Persson, Å., Runhaar, H., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Mullally, G., Russel, D., & Widmer, A. (2018). Editorial: Environmental policy integration: Taking stock of policy practice in different contexts. Environmental Science and Policy, 85, 113–15.Google Scholar

Persson, Å. (2004). Environmental policy integration: An introduction. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.Google Scholar

Persson, Å., Eckerberg, K., & Nilsson, M. (2016). Institutionalization or wither away? Twenty-five years of environmental policy integration under shifting governance models in Sweden. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34 (3), 478–95.Google Scholar

Persson, Å. (2009). Environmental policy integration and bilateral development assistance: Challenges and opportunities with an evolving governance framework. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 409–29.Google Scholar

Regina, K., Budiman, A., Greve, M. H. et al. (2015). GHG mitigation of agricultural peatlands requires coherent policies. Climate Policy, 16 (4), 522–41.Google Scholar

Revell, A. (2005). Ecological modernization in the UK: Rhetoric or reality? European Environment, 15 (6), 344–61.Google Scholar

Rosendal, G. K. (2012). Adjusting Norwegian agricultural policy to the WTO through multifunctionality: Utilizing the environmental potential? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 14 (2), 209–27.Google Scholar

Ruddy, T. F., & Hilty, L. M. (2008). Impact assessment and policy learning in the European Commission. Environmental Impact Assessment, 28, 90–105.Google Scholar

Runhaar, H. (2016). Tools for integrating environmental objectives into policy and practice: What works where? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 59, 1–9.Google Scholar

Runhaar, H., Wilk, B., Persson, Å., Uittenbroek, C., & Wamsler, C. (2018). Mainstreaming climate adaptation: Taking stock about ‘what works’ from empirical research worldwide. Regional Environmental Change, 18 (4), 1201–10.Google Scholar

Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & Uittenbroek, C. (2014). Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy integration. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24 (4), 233–46.Google Scholar

Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & Soer, L. (2009). Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration. An assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 36 (3), 417–31.Google Scholar

Schout, A., & Jordan, A. (2005). Coordinated European governance: Self-organizing or centrally steered? Public Administration, 83 (1), 201–20.Google Scholar

Scobie, M. (2016), Policy coherence in climate governance in Caribbean small island developing states. Environmental Science and Policy, 58, 16–28.Google Scholar

Selianko, I., & Lenschow, A. (2015). Energy policy coherence from an intra-institutional perspective: Energy security and environmental policy coordination within the European Commission. European Integration Online Papers 19 (2), 1–29.Google Scholar

Simeonova, V., & van der Valk, A. (2010). The role of an area-oriented approach in achieving environmental policy integration in the Netherlands, and its applicability in Bulgaria. European Planning Studies, 18 (9), 1411–43.Google Scholar

Simeonova, V., & van der Valk, A. (2016). Environmental policy integration: Towards a communicative approach in integrating nature conservation and urban planning in Bulgaria. Land Use Policy, 57, 80–93.Google Scholar

Söderberg, C. (2011). Institutional conditions for multi-sector environmental policy integration in Swedish bioenergy policy. Environmental Politics, 20 (4), 528–46.Google Scholar

Söderberg, C. (2014). What drives sub-national bioenergy development? Exploring cross-level implications of environmental policy integration in EU and Swedish bioenergy policy. European Journal of Government and Economics, 3 (2), 119–37.Google Scholar

Söderberg, C. (2016). Complex governance structures and incoherent policies: Implementing the EU water framework directive in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 90–97.Google Scholar

Stakeholder Forum (2016). Seeing the whole: Implementing the SDGs in an integrated and coherent way. London: Stakeholder Forum.Google Scholar

Storbjörk, S., Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., & Hilding-Rydevik, T. (2009). Conflict or consensus: The challenge of integrating environmental sustainability into regional development programming. European Journal of Spatial Development, 34, 1–22.Google Scholar

Storbjörk, S., & Isaksson, K. (2014). Learning is our Achilles heel: Conditions for long-term environmental policy integration in Swedish regional development programming. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57 (7), 1023–42.Google Scholar

Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38 (6), 553–70.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tosun, J., & Peters, B. G. (2018). Intergovernmental organizations’ normative commitments to policy integration: The dominance of environmental goals. Environmental Science and Policy, 82, 90–99.Google Scholar

Uittenbroek, C., Janssen-Jansen, L., Spit, T., & Runhaar, H. (2014). Organizational values and the implications for mainstreaming climate adaptation in Dutch municipalities: Using Q methodology. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 5 (3), 443–56.Google Scholar

Van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Persson, Å. (2015). Climate policy integration. In Bäckstrand, K, & Lövbrand, E (eds.), Research handbook on climate governance (pp. 388–99). Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar

Van Stigt, R., Driessen, P., & Spit, T. (2013). Compact city development and the challenge of environmental policy integration: A multi-level governance perspective. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23 (4), 221–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Velázquez Gomar, J. O. (2014). Environmental policy integration among multilateral environmental agreements: The case of biodiversity. International Environmental Agreements, 16 (4), 525–41.Google Scholar

Watson, M., Bulkeley, H., & Hudson, R. (2008). Unpicking environmental policy integration with tales from waste management. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26 (3), 481–98.Google Scholar

World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., Green, J. F., & Keohane, R. O. (2016). Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization, 70 (2), 247–77.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. Review of International Organizations, 5 (3), 315–44.Google Scholar

Aggarwal, V. K. (1983). The unraveling of the multi-fiber arrangement, 1981: An examination of international regime change. International Organization, 37 (4), 617–45.Google Scholar

Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7 (1), 13–24.Google Scholar

Andresen, S. (2007). The effectiveness of UN environmental institutions. International Environmental Agreements, 7 (4), 317–36.Google Scholar

Axelrod, M. (2011). Savings clauses and the ‘Chilling Effect’: Regime interplay as constraints on international governance. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 87–114). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Balton, D. A. (1996). Strengthening the law of the sea: The new agreement on straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. Ocean Development & International Law, 27 (1–2), 125–51.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. (2000). Ideas, social structure and the compromise of liberal institutionalism. European Journal of International Relations, 1, 347–71.Google Scholar

Betsill, M., Dubash, N. K., Paterson, M., van Asselt, H., Vihma, A., & Winkler, H. (2015). Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader global climate governance landscape. Global Environmental Politics, 15 (2), 1–10.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9 (4), 14–40.Google Scholar

Biermann, F. (2008). Earth system governance: A research agenda. In Young, O. R., King, L, & Schroeder, H (eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications and research frontiers (pp. 277–301). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2009). Managers of global change: The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F. et al. (2006). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100 (14), 8086–91.Google Scholar

Chayes, A., & Chayes, A. H. (1993). On compliance. International Organization, 47 (2), 175–205.Google Scholar

DeSombre, E. R. (2005). Fishing under flags of convenience: Using market power to increase participation in international regulation. Global Environmental Politics, 5 (4), 73–94.Google Scholar

Downie, D. L., & Fenge, T. (2003). Northern lights against POPs: Combatting toxic threats in the Arctic. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar

FAO. (1984). Report of the FAO world conference on fisheries management and development. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar

Franck, T. M. (1990). The power of legitimacy among nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garcia, S. M., & Newton, C. H. (1996). Responsible fisheries: An overview of FAO policy developments (1945–1994). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 29 (6–12), 528–36.Google Scholar

Gehring, T. (2011). The institutional complex of trade and environment: Toward an interlocking governance structure and a division of labor. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 227–54). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gehring, T., & Faude, B. (2013). The dynamics of regime complexes: Microfoundations and systemic effects. Global Governance, 19 (1), 119–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2009). The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council. Marine Policy, 33 (4), 654–60.Google Scholar

Gulbrandsen, L. H., & Auld, G. (2016). Contested accountability logics in evolving nonstate certification for fisheries sustainability. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (2), 42–60.Google Scholar

Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82 (5), 929–64.Google Scholar

Hickmann, T. (2017). The reconfiguration of authority in global climate governance. International Studies Review, 19 (3), 430–51.Google Scholar

Ivanova, M. (2010). UNEP in global environmental governance: Design, leadership, location. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (1), 30–59.Google Scholar

Jinnah, S. (2014). Post-treaty politics: Secretariat influence in global environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Juda, L. (2002). Rio plus ten: The evolution of international marine fisheries governance. Ocean Development & International Law, 33 (2), 109–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jungcurt, S. (2011). The role of expert networks in reducing regime conflict: Contrasting cases in the management of plant genetic resources. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 171–98). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kent, A. (2014). Implementing the principle of policy integration: institutional interplay and the role of international organizations. International Environmental Agreements, 14 (3), 203–24.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9 (1), 7–23.Google Scholar

Kim, R. E. (2013). The emergent network structure of the multilateral environmental agreement system. Global Environmental Change, 23 (5), 980–91.Google Scholar

Kvalvik, I. (2012). Managing institutional overlap in the protection of marine ecosystems on the high seas. The case of the North East Atlantic. Ocean and Coastal Management, 56, 35–43.Google Scholar

Leebron, D. W. (2002). Linkages. American Journal of International Law, 96 (1), 5–27.Google Scholar

Margulis, M. E. (2013). The regime complex for food security: Implications for the global hunger challenge. Global Governance, 19 (1), 53–67.Google Scholar

Molenaar, E. J. (2007). Port state jurisdiction: Towards comprehensive, mandatory and global coverage. Ocean Development & International Law, 38 (1–2), 225–57.Google Scholar

Morin, J. F., & Orsini, A. (2014). Policy coherency and regime complexes: The case of genetic resources. Review of International Studies, 40 (2), 303–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marine Stewardship Council (2017). Annual Report 2016–17: The MSC at 20. Wild, certified, sustainable. London: Marine Stewardship Council.Google Scholar

Newell, P., Pattberg, P., & Schroeder, H. (2012). Multiactor governance and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 365–87.Google Scholar

O’Neill, K., Weinthal, E., Suiseeya, K. R. M., Bernstein, S., Cohn, A., Stone, M. W., & Cashore, B. (2013). Methods and global environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 441–71.Google Scholar

Oberthür, S. (2009). Interplay management: Enhancing environmental policy integration among international institutions. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 371–91.Google Scholar

Oberthür, S., Dupont, C., & Matsumoto, Y. (2011). Managing policy contradictions between the Montreal and Kyoto protocols: The case of fluorinated greenhouse gases. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 115–41). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Oberthür, S., & Gehring, T. (eds.) (2006). Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: Synergy and conflict among international and EU policies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Oberthür, S., & Stokke, O. S. (eds.) (2011). Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ochieng, R. M., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., & Nketiah, K. S. (2013). Interaction between the FLEGT-VPA and REDD+ in Ghana: Recommendations for interaction management. Forestry Policy and Economics, 32, 32–9.Google Scholar

Orsini, A., Morin, J. F., & Young, O. R. (2013). Regime complexes: A buzz, a boom, or a boost for global governance? Global Governance, 19, 27–39.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284 (5412), 278–82.Google Scholar

Pattberg, P. (2005). The institutionalization of private governance: How business and on-profit organizations agree on transnational rules. Governance, 18 (4), 589–610.Google Scholar

Pratt, T. (2018). Deference and hierarchy in international regime complexes. International Organization, 72 (3), 561–90.Google Scholar

Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58 (2), 277–309.Google Scholar

Rosendal, G. K. (2001). Overlapping international regimes: The case of the Intergovernmental Forum on Forests (IFF) between climate change and biodiversity. International Environmental Agreements, 1 (4), 447–68.Google Scholar

Rothwell, D. R., & Stephens, T. (2016). The international law of the sea. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar

Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & Uittenbroek, C. (2014). Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy integration. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24 (4), 233–46.Google Scholar

Scott, K. N. (2011). International environmental governance: Managing fragmentation through institutional connection. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 12 (1), 177–216.Google Scholar

Skjærseth, J. B. (2006). Protecting the North-East Atlantic: Enhancing synergies by institutional interplay. Marine Policy, 30 (2), 157–66.Google Scholar

Spijkers, J., & Boonstra, W. J. (2017). Environmental change and social conflict: The Northeast Atlantic mackerel dispute. Regional Environmental Change, 17 (6), 1835–51.Google Scholar

Stokke, O. S. (ed.) (2001a). Governing high seas fisheries: The interplay of global and regional regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stokke, O. S. (2001b). The interplay of international regimes: Putting effectiveness theory to work. Lysaker: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.Google Scholar

Stokke, O. S. (2004). Trade measures and climate compliance: Interplay between WTO and the Marrakesh Accords. International Environmental Agreements, 4 (4), 339–57.Google Scholar

Stokke, O. S. (2009). Trade measures and the combat of IUU fishing: Institutional interplay and effective governance in the Northeast Atlantic. Marine Policy, 33 (2), 339–49.Google Scholar

Stokke, O. S. (2011a). Environmental security in the Arctic: The case for multilevel governance. International Journal, 66 (4), 835–48.Google Scholar

Stokke, O. S. (2011b). Interplay management, niche selection and Arctic environmental governance. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 143–70). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stokke, O. S. (2012). Disaggregating international regimes: A new approach to evaluation and comparison. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stokke, O. S. (2013). Regime interplay in Arctic shipping governance: Explaining regional niche selection. International Environmental Agreements, 13, 65–85.Google Scholar

Stokke, O. S. (2019). Management options for high seas fisheries: Making regime complexes more effective. In Caddell, J. R., & Molenaar, E. J. (eds.), Strengthening international fisheries law in an era of changing oceans (pp. 51–79). London: Hart Publishers.Google Scholar

Stokke, O. S., & Oberthür, S. (2011). Introduction: Institutional interaction in global environmental change. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 1–24). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

United Nations Environment Programme (2016). Programme of work and budget for the biennium 2018–2019. UN Doc. UNEP/EA.2/16.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly (1972). Institutional and financial arrangements for environmental cooperation. UN Doc. A/RES/2997(XXVII).Google Scholar

Van Asselt, H. (2011). Legal and political approaches in interplay management: Dealing with the fragmentation of global climate governance. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 59–85). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Van Asselt, H. (2014). The fragmentation of global climate governance: Consequences and management of regime interactions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Van de Graaf, T., & De Ville, F. (2013). Regime complexes and interplay management. International Studies Review, 15 (4), 568–71.Google Scholar

World Trade Organization (2018). The environment: A specific concern. Available at: www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/bey2_e.htm. Accessed: 17 June 2019.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. (1996). Institutional linkages in international society: Polar perspectives. Global Governance, 2 (1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Zelli, F., Gupta, A., & van Asselt, H. (2013). Institutional interactions at the crossroads of trade and environment: The dominance of liberal environmentalism? Global Governance, 19 (1), 105–18.Google Scholar

Zürn, M., & Faude, B. (2013). On fragmentation, differentiation, and coordination. Global Environmental Politics, 13 (3), 119–30.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W. (2012a). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30 (4), 571–90.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W. (2012b). Engaging the public and the private in global sustainability governance. International Affairs, 88 (3), 543–64.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W. (2014). Strengthening the transnational regime complex for climate change. Transnational Environmental Law, 3 (1), 57–88.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W. (2015). Orchestration. In Pattberg, P. H., & Zelli, F (eds.), Encyclopedia of global environmental governance and politics (pp. 487–95). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W. (2017). Orchestrating experimentation in nonstate environmental commitments. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 738–63.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W. (2018). Orchestration: Strategic ordering in polycentric governance. In Jordan, A, Huitema, D, van Asselt, H, & Forster, J (eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 188–209). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., & Bernstein, S. (2015). The High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development: Orchestration by default and design. Global Policy, 6 (3), 222–33.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., & Faude, B. (2019). Choosing low-cost institutions in global governance. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015a). Orchestration: Global governance through intermediaries. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 3–36). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015b). Orchestrating global governance: From empirical findings to theoretical implications. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 349–79). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2016). Two logics of indirect governance: Delegation and orchestration. British Journal of Political Science, 46 (4), 719–29.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2019). Competence versus control: The governor’s dilemma. Regulation & Governance, in press.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., & Hale, T. (2014). Orchestrating global solutions networks: A guide for organizational entrepreneurs. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 9 (1–2), 195–212.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017). Theorizing regulatory intermediaries. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670 (1), 14–35.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2009a). Strengthening international regulation through transnational new governance: Overcoming the orchestration deficit. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 501–78.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2009b). The governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In Mattli, W, & Woods, N (eds.), In whose benefit? Explaining regulatory change in global politics (pp. 49–84). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. Review of International Organizations, 5 (3), 315–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Taking responsive regulation transnational: Strategies for international organizations: Taking RR transnational. Regulation & Governance, 7 (1), 95–113.Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, K., & Kuyper, J. W. (2017). The democratic legitimacy of orchestration: The UNFCCC, nonstate actors, and transnational climate governance. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 764–88.Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., & Lövbrand, E. (2017). Nonstate actors in global climate governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 561–79.Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, K., & Kylsäter, M. (2014). Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and delegitimation of UN public–private partnerships for sustainable development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit. Globalizations, 11 (3), 331–47.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. (2011). Legitimacy in intergovernmental and nonstate global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18 (1), 17–51.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. (2005). Legitimacy in global environmental governance. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 1 (1–2), 139–66.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. (2017). The United Nations and the governance of Sustainable Development Goals. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governance through goals: New strategies for global sustainability (pp. 213–39). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Best, J. (2017). The rise of measurement-driven governance: The case of international development. Global Governance, 23 (2), 163–81.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J. et al. (2009). Earth system governance: People, places and the planet. Science and implementation plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Bonn: Earth System Governance Project.Google Scholar

Boas, I., Biermann, F., Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: Towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements, 16 (3), 449–64.Google Scholar

Broome, A., Homolar, A., & Kranke, M. (2018). Bad science: International organizations and the indirect power of global benchmarking. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (3), 514–39.Google Scholar

Burch, S., Gupta, A., Inoue, C. Y. A. et al. (2019). New directions in earth system governance research. Earth System Governance, 1.Google Scholar

Chan, S., van Asselt, H., Hale, T. et al. (2015). Reinvigorating international climate policy: A comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6 (4), 466–73.Google Scholar

Chan, S., Brandi, C., & Bauer, S. (2016). Aligning transnational climate action with international climate governance: The road from Paris. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25 (2), 238–47.Google Scholar

Chan, S., Ellinger, P., & Widerberg, O. (2018). Exploring national and regional orchestration of nonstate action for a < 1.5 C world. International Environmental Agreements, 18 (1), 135–52.Google Scholar

Chan, S., Falkner, R., Goldberg, M., & van Asselt, H. (2018). Effective and geographically balanced? An output-based assessment of nonstate climate actions. Climate Policy, 18 (1), 24–35.Google Scholar

Chan, S., & Pauw, P. (2014). A global framework for climate action (GFCA): Orchestrating nonstate and subnational initiatives for more effective global climate governance. Bonn: German Development Institute.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S. (2017). The meanings of life for nonstate actors in climate politics. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 789–99.Google Scholar

Earth System Governance (2018). Earth system governance: Science and implementation plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Utrecht: Earth System Governance Project.Google Scholar

Gordon, D. J. (2016). The politics of accountability in networked urban climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (2), 82–100.Google Scholar

Gordon, D. J., & Johnson, C. A. (2017). The orchestration of global urban climate governance: Conducting power in the post-Paris climate regime. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 694–714.Google Scholar

Graham, E. R., & Thompson, A. (2015). Efficient orchestration? In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 114–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Green, J. F. (2017). Transnational delegation in global environmental governance: When do non-state actors govern? Regulation & Governance, 12 (2), 263–76.Google Scholar

Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Review of International Organizations, 9 (1), 59–82.Google Scholar

Hanrieder, T. (2015). WHO orchestrates? Coping with competitors in global health. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 3–36). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Henriksen, La. F. (2015). The global network of biofuel sustainability standards-setters. Environmental Politics, 24 (1), 115–37.Google Scholar

Henriksen, L. F., & Ponte, S. (2017). Public orchestration, social networks, and transnational environmental governance: Lessons from the aviation industry: Public orchestration in aviation. Regulation & Governance, 12 (1), 23–45.Google Scholar

Henriksen, L. F., & Seabrooke, L. (2016). Transnational organizing: Issue professionals in environmental sustainability networks. Organization, 23 (5), 722–41.Google Scholar

Hermwille, L. (2018). Making initiatives resonate: How can nonstate initiatives advance national contributions under the UNFCCC? International Environmental Agreements, 18 (3), 447–66.Google Scholar

Hermwille, L., Obergassel, W., Ott, H. E., & Beuermann, C. (2017). UNFCCC before and after Paris: What’s necessary for an effective climate regime? Climate Policy, 17 (2), 150–70.Google Scholar

Hickmann, T. (2016). Rethinking authority in global climate governance: How transnational climate initiatives relate to the international climate regime. Routledge Research in Global Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hickmann, T., Widerberg, O., Lederer, M., & Pattberg, P. (2019). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat as an orchestrator in global climate policymaking. International Review of Administrative Sciences, in press.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate governance at the crossroads: Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hsu, A., Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T. et al. (2019). A research roadmap for quantifying nonstate and subnational climate mitigation action. Nature Climate Change, 9 (1), 11–17.Google Scholar

Hsu, A., Moffat, A. S., Weinfurter, A. J., & Schwartz, J. D. (2015). Towards a new climate diplomacy. Nature Climate Change, 5 (6), 501–3.Google Scholar

Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (eds.) (2017). Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., & Schroeder, H. (2018). Nonstate actors in hybrid global climate governance: Justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post-Paris era: Nonstate actors in hybrid global climate governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9 (1), e497.Google Scholar

Lelieveldt, H. (2018). Out of tune or well tempered? How competition agencies direct the orchestrating state: Directing the orchestrating state. Regulation & Governance, in press.Google Scholar

Lister, J., Poulsen, R. T., & Ponte, S. (2015). Orchestrating transnational environmental governance in maritime shipping. Global Environmental Change, 34, 185–95.Google Scholar

McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3 (2), 243–77.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1991). Polycentricity: The structural basis of self-governing systems. In Ostrom, V (ed.), The meaning of American federalism: Constituting a self-governing society (pp. 233–44). San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar

Pattberg, P. H. (2017). The emergence of carbon disclosure: Exploring the role of governance entrepreneurs. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35 (8), 1437–55.Google Scholar

Pattberg, P. H., Biermann, F., & Mert, A. (eds.) (2012). Public–private partnerships for sustainable development: Emergence, influence and legitimacy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Paulo, S., & Klingebiel, S. (2016). New approaches to development cooperation in middle-income countries: Brokering collective action for global sustainable development. Bonn: German Development Institute.Google Scholar

Pegram, T. (2015). Global human rights governance and orchestration: National human rights institutions as intermediaries. European Journal of International Relations, 21 (3), 595–620.Google Scholar

Rayner, J. M., Buck, A., & Katila, P. (eds.) (2010). Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report. Vienna: International Union of Forest Research Organizations.Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G. (2014). Global governance and ‘New Governance Theory’: Lessons from business and human rights. Global Governance, 20 (1), 5–17.Google Scholar

Schleifer, P. (2013). Orchestrating sustainability: The case of European Union biofuel governance: Orchestrating sustainability. Regulation & Governance, 7 (4), 533–46.Google Scholar

Shoji, M. (2019). The UN Global compact for transnational business and peace: A need for orchestration? In Mahmudur Rahim, M (ed.), Code of conduct on transnational corporations: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 89–110). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Tallberg, J., Bäckstrand, K., & Scholte, J. A. (eds.) (2018). Legitimacy in global governance: Sources, processes, and consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. UN Doc. A/RES/70/1.Google Scholar

Van der Lugt, C., & Dingwerth, K. (2015). Governing where focality is low. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 237–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van der Ven, H., Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2017). Valuing the contributions of nonstate and subnational actors to climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17 (1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Widerberg, O. (2017). The ‘black box’ problem of orchestration: How to evaluate the performance of the Lima-Paris action agenda. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 715–37.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay and scale. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (eds.) (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W., & Bernstein, S. (2015). The High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development: Orchestration by default and design. Global Policy, 6, 222–33.Google Scholar

Abshagen, M. L., Cavazzini, A., Graen, L., & Obenland, W. (2018). Hijacking the SDGs? The private sector and the Sustainable Development Goals. Berlin: Brot für die Welt.Google Scholar

Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13 (5), 1453–67.Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, K. (2006a). Multi‐stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16 (5), 290–306.Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, K. (2006b). Democratizing global environmental governance? Stakeholder democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development. European Journal of International Relations, 12 (4), 467–98.Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, K., Campe, S., Chan, S., Mert, A., & Schäferhoff, M. (2012). Transnational public–private partnerships. In Biermann, F, & Pattberg, P (eds.), Global environmental governance reconsidered (pp. 123–47). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, K., & Kylsäter, M. (2014). Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and delegitimation of UN public–private partnerships for sustainable development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit. Globalizations, 11 (3), 331–47.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. (2017). The United Nations and the governance of Sustainable Development Goals. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 213–40). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9 (4), 14–40.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., & Gupta, A. (2011). Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics, 70, 1856–64.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., Chan, S., Pattberg, P., & Mert, A. (eds.) (2012). Multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Emergence, influence and legitimacy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: The novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26–31.Google Scholar

Bitzer, V., Francken, M., & Glasbergen, P. (2008). Intersectoral partnerships for a sustainable coffee chain: Really addressing sustainability or just picking (coffee) cherries? Global Environmental Change, 18 (2), 271–84.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. (2010). The Copenhagen conference: A post-mortem. American Journal of International Law, 104 (2), 232–3.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. (2016). The legal character of the Paris Agreement. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25 (2), 142–50.Google Scholar

Briant Carant, J. (2017). Unheard voices: A critical discourse analysis of the Millennium Development Goals’ evolution into the Sustainable Development Goals. Third World Quarterly, 38 (1), 16–41.Google Scholar

Bridgewater, P., Kim, R. E., & Bosselmann, K. (2014). Ecological integrity: A relevant concept for international environmental law in the Anthropocene? Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 25, 61–78.Google Scholar

Chasek, P. S., Wagner, L. M, Leone, F., Lebada, A. M., & Risse., N. (2016). Getting to 2030: Negotiating the post-2015 sustainable development agenda. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25, 5–14.Google Scholar

Chasek, P. S., & Wagner, L. M. (2016). Breaking the mold: A new type of multilateral sustainable development negotiation. International Environmental Agreements, 16, 397–413.Google Scholar

Deacon, B. (2016). Assessing the SDGs from the point of view of global social governance. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 32 (2), 116–30.Google Scholar

Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–12.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S., & Pickering, J. (2017). Deliberation as a catalyst for reflexive environmental governance. Ecological Economics, 131, 353–60.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a changing earth system. British Journal of Political Science, 46 (4), 937–56.Google Scholar

Easterly, W. (2009). How the Millennium Development Goals are unfair to Africa. World Development, 37 (1), 26–35.Google Scholar

Eckersley, R. (2004). Green state: Rethinking democracy and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Elder, M., & Olsen, S. H. (2019). The design of environmental priorities in the SDGs. Global Policy, 10 (S1), 70–82.Google Scholar

Elliott, L. (2005). The United Nations’ record on environmental governance: An assessment. In Biermann, F, & Bauer, S (eds.), A world environment organization: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? (pp. 27–56). Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Elliott, L. (2017). Cooperation on transnational environmental crime: Institutional complexity matters. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 26, 107–17.Google Scholar

Falk, R. A. (1966). On the quasi-legislative competence of the General Assembly. American Journal of International Law, 60 (4), 782–91.Google Scholar

Feindt, P. H., & Weiland, S. (2018). Reflexive governance: Exploring the concept and assessing its critical potential for sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20 (6), 661–74.Google Scholar

Fernández-Blanco, C. R., Burns, S. L., & Giessen, L. (2019). Mapping the fragmentation of the international forest regime complex: Institutional elements, conflicts and synergies. International Environmental Agreements, 19 (2), 187–205.Google Scholar

Franck, T. M. (1990). The power of legitimacy among nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fukuda-Parr, S. (2010). Reducing inequality – The missing MDG: A content review of PRSPs and bilateral donor policy statements. IDS Bulletin, 41 (1), 26–35.Google Scholar

Fukuda-Parr, S. (2014). Global goals as a policy tool: Intended and unintended consequences. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15 (2–3), 118–31.Google Scholar

Fukuda-Parr, S. (2016). From the Millennium Development Goals to the Sustainable Development Goals: Shifts in purpose, concept and politics of global goal setting for development. Gender and Development, 24 (1), 43–52.Google Scholar

Fukuda‐Parr, S., & McNeill, D. (2019). Knowledge and politics in setting and measuring the SDGs. Global Policy, 10 (S1), 5–15.Google Scholar

Fukuda-Parr, S., Yamin, A. E., & Greenstein, J. (2014). The power of numbers: A critical review of Millennium Development Goal targets for human development and human rights. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15 (2–3), 105–17.Google Scholar

Galli, A., Durović, G., Hanscom, L., & Knežević, J. (2018). Think globally, act locally: Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals in Montenegro. Environmental Science and Policy, 84, 159–69.Google Scholar

Gasper, D., Shah, A., & Tankha, S. (2019). The framing of sustainable consumption and production in SDG 12. Global Policy, 10 (S1), 83–95.Google Scholar

Gellers, J. C. (2016). Crowdsourcing global governance: Sustainable Development Goals, civil society and the pursuit of democratic legitimacy. International Environmental Agreements, 16, 415–32.Google Scholar

Glasbergen, P., Biermann, F., & Mol, A. P. J. (eds.) (2007). Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. L., & Posner, E. A. (2005). The limits of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Griggs, D. J., Nilsson, M., Stevance, A., & McCollum, D. (2017). A guide to SDG interactions: From science to implementation. Paris: International Council for Science.Google Scholar

Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements, 16, 433–48.Google Scholar

Hailu, D., & Tsukada, R. (2011). Achieving the Millennium Development Goals: A measure of progress. Brasilia: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.Google Scholar

Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K. et al. (2015). Beyond cockpit-ism: Four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 7, 1651–60.Google Scholar

Hill, P. S., Ghulam, F. M., & Claudio, F. (2010). Conflict in least-developed countries: Challenging the Millennium Development Goals. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88 (8), 562.Google Scholar

Honniball, A., & Spijkers, O. (2014). MDGs and SDGs – Lessons learnt from global public participation in the drafting of the UN Development Goals. Vereinte Nationen: German Review of the United Nations, 62 (6), 251–6.Google Scholar

Huck, W., & Kurkin, C. (2018). The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the transnational multilevel system. Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 2, 375.Google Scholar

Hulme, D. (2010). Lessons from the making of the MDGs: Human development meets results-based management in an unfair world. IDS Bulletin, 41 (1), 15–25.Google Scholar

Ivanova, M. H. (2013). Reforming the institutional framework for environment and sustainable development: Rio+20’s subtle but significant impact. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 12 (3), 211–31.Google Scholar

Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (eds.) (2018). Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kabeer, N. (2010). Can the MDGs provide a pathway to social justice? The challenge of intersecting inequalities. New York: Institute of Development Studies and MDG Achievement Fund.Google Scholar

Kamau, M., Chasek, P., & O’Connor, D. (2018). Transforming multilateral diplomacy: The inside story of the sustainable development goals. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (eds.) (2017). Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kanie, N., Bernstein, S., Biermann, F., & Haas, P. M. (2017). Introduction: Global governance through goal setting. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governance through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. O. (2011). Global governance and legitimacy. Review of International Political Economy, 18 (1), 99–109.Google Scholar

Kim, R. E., & Bosselmann, K. (2015). Operationalizing sustainable development: Ecological integrity as a Grundnorm of international law. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 24, 194–208.Google Scholar

Kim, R. E., & Bosselmann, K. (2013). International environmental law in the Anthropocene: Towards a purposive system of multilateral environmental agreements. Transnational Environmental Law, 2, 285–309.Google Scholar

Kim, R. E. (2016). The nexus between international law and the Sustainable Development Goals. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25 (1), 15–26.Google Scholar

Koehler, G. (2015). Seven decades of ‘development’, and now what? Journal of International Development, 27 (6), 733–51.Google Scholar

Langford, M., & Winkler, I. (2014). Muddying the water? Assessing target-based approaches in development cooperation for water and sanitation. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15 (2–3), 247–60.Google Scholar

Langford, M. (2010). A poverty of rights: Six ways to fix the MDGs. IDS Bulletin, 41 (1), 83–91.Google Scholar

Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23, 176–87.Google Scholar

Lodefalk, M., & Whalley, J. (2002). Reviewing proposals for a world environmental organisation. The World Economy, 25, 601–17.Google Scholar

MacFeely, S. (2019). The big (data) bang: Opportunities and challenges for compiling SDG indicators. Global Policy, 10 (S1), 121–33.Google Scholar

Merry, S. E. (2019). The Sustainable Development Goals confront the infrastructure of measurement. Global Policy, 10 (S1), 146–8.Google Scholar

Meuleman, L., & Niestroy, I. (2015). Common but differentiated governance: A metagovernance approach to make the SDGs work. Sustainability, 7, 12295–321.Google Scholar

Patel, Z., Greyling, S., Simon, D., Arfvidsson, H., Moodley, N., Primo, N., & Wright, C. (2017). Local responses to global sustainability agendas: Learning from experimenting with the urban Sustainable Development Goal in Cape Town. Sustainability Science, 12 (5), 785–97.Google Scholar

Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2016). Transnational multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Conditions for success. AMBIO, 45 (1), 42–51.Google Scholar

Pedersen, C. S. (2018). The UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) are a great gift to business! Procedia CIRP, 69, 21–4.Google Scholar

Persson, Å., Weitz, N., Nilsson, M. (2016). Follow-up and review of the Sustainable Development Goals: Alignment vs. internalization. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25, 59–68.Google Scholar

Poddar, A., Narula, S. A., & Zutshi, A. (2019). A study of corporate social responsibility practices of the top Bombay Stock Exchange 500 companies in India and their alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1–22.Google Scholar

Raustiala, K. (2005). Form and substance in international agreements. American Journal of International Law, 99 (3), 581–92.Google Scholar

Sachs, J. D. (2012). From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet, 379, 2206–11.Google Scholar

Sarwar, M. B., & Nicolai, S. (2018). What do analysis of Voluntary National Reviews for Sustainable Development Goals tell us about ‘leaving no one behind’? London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar

Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The private sector and the SDGs: The need to move beyond ‘business as usual’. Sustainable Development, 24 (6), 371–82.Google Scholar

Solberg, E. (2015). From MDGs to SDGs – The political value of common global goals. Harvard International Review, 37 (1), 58–61.Google Scholar

Spangenberg, J. H. (2017). Hot air or comprehensive progress? A critical assessment of the SDGs. Sustainable Development, 25 (4), 311–21.Google Scholar

Stevens, C., & Kanie, N. (2016). The transformative potential of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). International Environmental Agreements, 16, 393–6.Google Scholar

UNCTAD (2014). Investing in the SDGs: An action plan. UNCTAD: World Investment Report 2014.Google Scholar

Underdal, A., & Kim, R. E. (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals and multilateral agreements. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 241–58). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly (2012). The future we want. UN Doc. A/RES/66/288.Google Scholar

United Nations Global Compact (2019). United Nations Global Compact. Available at: www.unglobalcompact.org. Accessed: 17 June 2019.Google Scholar

Van der Hoeven, R. (2014). Full employment target: What lessons for a Post-2015 Development Agenda? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15 (2–3), 161–75.Google Scholar

Van Zanten, J. A., & van Tulder, R. (2018). Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1 (3–4), 208–33.Google Scholar

Victor, D. G., Raustiala, K., & Skolnikoff, E. B. (eds.) (1998). The implementation and effectiveness of international environmental commitments: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., & Verkooijen, P. (2013). The practice of interaction management: Enhancing synergies among multilateral REDD+ Institutions. Forest and Nature Governance World Forests, 14, 133–49.Google Scholar

Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Arts, B., & Glasbergen, P. (2011). Interaction management by partnerships: The case of biodiversity and climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 11 (4), 89–107.Google Scholar

Voß, J.-P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance: Introduction. In Voß, J, Bauknecht, D, & Kemp, R (eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 3–30). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Weber, H. (2017). Politics of ‘leaving no one behind’: Contesting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals agenda. Globalizations, 14 (3), 399–414.Google Scholar

Yamada, T. (2017). Corporate water stewardship: Lessons for goal-based hybrid governance. In Kanie, N & Biermann, F (eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 187–209). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. (2017). Conceptualization: Goal setting as a strategy for earth system governance. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governance through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 31–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zelli, F., Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., & van Asselt, H. (2010). The consequences of a fragmented climate governance architecture: A policy appraisal. In Biermann, F, Pattberg, P, & Zelli, F (eds.), Global climate governance beyond 2012. Architecture, agency and adaptation (pp. 25–34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aguila, Y., & Viñuales, J. (2019). A Global Pact for the Environment: Conceptual foundations. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 29, 3–12.Google Scholar

Alston, P. (1984). Conjuring up new human rights: A proposal for quality control. American Journal of International Law, 78, 607–21.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J. E. (2005). International organizations as law-makers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Andresen, S. (2007). Key actors in UN environmental governance: Influence, reform and leadership. International Environmental Agreements, 7 (4), 457–68.Google Scholar

Axelrod, M. (2011). Savings clauses and the ‘chilling effect’: Regime interplay as constraints on international governance. In Oberthür, S, & Stokke, O. S. (eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 87–114). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E., & Downs, G. W. (2007). The empire’s new clothes: Political economy and the fragmentation of international law. Stanford Law Review, 60, 595–631.Google Scholar

Biermann, F. (2000). The case for a world environment organization. Environment, 42 (9), 22–32.Google Scholar

Biermann, F. (2001). The emerging debate on the need for a world environment organization: A commentary. Global Environmental Politics, 1, 45–55.Google Scholar

Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., Davies, O., & van der Grijp, N. (2009). Environmental policy integration and the architecture of global environmental governance. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 351.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: The novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26–31.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2008). Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 277–94.Google Scholar

Biniaz, S. (2017). 10 questions to ask about the proposed ‘Global Pact for the Environment’. New York: Sabin Centre for Climate Change Law.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. (2006). Does one need to be an international lawyer to be an international environmental lawyer? American Society of International Law Proceedings, 100, 303–7.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. (2009). Is there an international environmental constitution? Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 16, 565–84.Google Scholar

Bosselmann, K. (2015). Global environmental constitutionalism: Mapping the terrain. Widener Law Review, 21, 171–85.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. E. (1999). Some reflections on the relationship of treaties and soft law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 48, 901–13.Google Scholar

Broude, T., & Shany, Y. (eds.) (2011). Multi-sourced equivalent norms in international law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, S. (2012). Organizing for the green economy: What an international green economy organization could add. Journal of Environment and Development, 21 (1), 44–7.Google Scholar

Costanza, R., McGlade, J., Lovins, H., & Kubiszewski, I. (2015). An overarching goal for the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Solutions, 5, 13–16.Google Scholar

De Wet, E., & Vidmar, J. (2012). Introduction. In De Wet, E, & Vidmar, J (eds.), Hierarchy in international law: The place of human rights (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2006). Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 12, 185–203.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S., Bächtiger, A., & Milewicz, K. (2011). Toward a deliberative global citizens’ assembly. Global Policy, 2, 33–42.Google Scholar

Duit, A., Galaz, V., Eckerberg, K., & Ebbesson, J. (2010). Governance, complexity, and resilience. Global Environmental Change, 20, 363–8.Google Scholar

Earth Negotiations Bulletin (2019). Summary of the third substantive session of the Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group towards a Global Pact for the Environment: 20–22 May 2019. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 35, 1–12.Google Scholar

Fischer, J., Manning, A. D., Steffen, W. et al. (2007). Mind the sustainability gap. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 621–4.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., & Teubner, G. (2004). Regime collisions: The vain search for legal unity in the fragmentation of global law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25, 999–1073.Google Scholar

Friedrich, J. (2013). International environmental ‘soft law’. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Fukuda-Parr, S. (2014). Global Goals as a policy tool: Intended and unintended consequences. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15, 118–31.Google Scholar

Galaz, V., Olsson, P., Hahn, T., Folke, C., & Svedin, U. (2008). The problem of fit between governance systems and environmental regimes. In Young, O. R., King, L. A., & Schroeder, H (eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications and research frontiers (pp. 147–86). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O. et al. (2013). Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495, 305–7.Google Scholar

Haas, P. M. (2007). Turning up the heat on global environmental governance. The Forum, 5.Google Scholar

Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K. et al. (2015). Beyond cockpit-ism: Four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 7, 1651–60.Google Scholar

Halevy, N., Y Chou, E., Galinsky, A. D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 32–52.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hoare, A., & Tarasofsky, R. (2007). International environmental governance. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar

International Law Commission (2006). Fragmentation of international law: Difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682.Google Scholar

International Law Commission (2019). Peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens). UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.936.Google Scholar

Ivanova, M. H. (2007). Designing the United Nations Environment Programme: A story of compromise and confrontation. International Environmental Agreements, 7 (4), 337–61.Google Scholar

Ivanova, M. H. (2013). Reforming the institutional framework for environment and sustainable development: Rio+20’s subtle but significant impact. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 12 (3), 211–31.Google Scholar

Ivanova, M. H., & Roy, J. (2007). The architecture of global environmental governance: Pros and cons of multiplicity. In Swart, L, & Perry, E (eds.), Global environmental governance: Perspectives on the current debate (pp. 48–66). New York: Center for UN Reform Education.Google Scholar

Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (eds.) (2018). Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kanie, N. (2007). Governance with multilateral environmental agreements: A healthy or ill-equipped fragmentation? In Swart, L, & Perry, E (eds.), Global environmental governance: Perspectives on the current debate (pp. 67–86). New York: Center for UN Reform Education.Google Scholar

Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (eds.) (2017). Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. (1960). Reine Rechtslehre. Vienna: Deuticke.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 7–23.Google Scholar

Kim, R. E. (2016). The nexus between international law and the Sustainable Development Goals. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25, 15–26.Google Scholar

Kim, R. E., & Bosselmann, K. (2013). International environmental law in the Anthropocene: Towards a purposive system of multilateral environmental agreements. Transnational Environmental Law, 2, 285–309.Google Scholar

Kim, R. E., & Bosselmann, K. (2015). Operationalizing sustainable development: Ecological integrity as a Grundnorm of international law. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 24, 194–208.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. (1996). The redundancy of soft law. Nordic Journal of International Law, 65, 167–82.Google Scholar

Knox, J. H. (2019). The Global Pact for the Environment: At the crossroads of human rights and the environment. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 29, 40–7.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., & Leino, P. (2002). Fragmentation of international law? Postmodern anxieties. Leiden Journal of International Law, 15, 553–79.Google Scholar

Kotzé, L. J. (2012). Arguing global environmental constitutionalism. Transnational Environmental Law, 1, 199–233.Google Scholar

Kotzé, L. J. (2015). Constitutional conversations in the Anthropocene: In search of environmental jus cogens norms. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 46, 241–71.Google Scholar

Kotzé, L. J. (2016). Global environmental constitutionalism in the Anthropocene. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Kotzé, L. J. (2018). In search of a right to a healthy environment in international law. In Knox, J, & Pejan, R (eds.), The human right to a healthy environment (pp. 136–54). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kotzé, L. J. (2019a). A global environmental constitution for the Anthropocene? Transnational Environmental Law, 8, 11–33.Google Scholar

Kotzé, L. J. (2019b). International environmental law’s lack of normative ambition: An Opportunity for the Global Pact for the Environment? Journal of European Environmental and Planning Law, 16, 213–36.Google Scholar

Kotzé, L. J., & French, D. (2018). A critique of the Global Pact for the Environment: A stillborn initiative or the foundation for Lex Anthropocenae? International Environmental Agreements, 18, 811–38.Google Scholar

Kotzé, L. J, & Muzangaza, W. (2018). Constitutional international environmental law for the Anthropocene? Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 27, 278–292.Google Scholar

Lafferty, W., & Hovden, E. (2003). Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12, 1–22.Google Scholar

Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 212–47.Google Scholar

Lehmen, A. (2015). The case for the creation of an international environmental court: Non-state actors and international environmental dispute resolution. Colorado Natural Resources, Energy, and Environmental Law Review, 26, 179–217.Google Scholar

Liivoja, R. (2008). The scope of the supremacy clause of the United Nations Charter. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 57, 583–612.Google Scholar

Linnér, B. O., & Selin, H. (2013). The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development: Forty years in the making. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31 (6), 971–87.Google Scholar

Lodefalk, M., & Whalley, J. (2002). Reviewing proposals for a world environmental organisation. The World Economy, 25, 601–17.Google Scholar

Mawdsley, E. (2018). ‘From billions to trillions’: Financing the SDGs in a world ‘beyond aid’. Dialogues in Human Geography, 8, 191–5.Google Scholar

Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9 (3–4), 299–314.Google Scholar

Meyer-Ohlendorf, N., & Knigge, M. (2007). A United Nations Environment Organization. In Swart, L, & Perry, E (eds.), Global environmental governance: Perspectives on the current debate (pp. 124–41). New York: Center for UN Reform Education.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. B. (2003). International environmental agreements: A survey of their features, formation, and effects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 429–461.Google Scholar

Morseletto, P., Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2017). Governing by targets: Reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target. International Environmental Agreements, 17, 655–76.Google Scholar

Murphy, S. D. (1999). Does the world need a new international environmental court? George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, 32, 333–49.Google Scholar

Najam, A. (2003). The case against a new international environmental organization. Global Governance, 9, 367–84.Google Scholar

Najam, A. (2005). Neither necessary, nor sufficient: Why organizational tinkering won’t improve environmental governance. In Biermann, F, & Bauer, S (eds.), A world environment organization: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? (pp. 235–56). Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature, 534, 320–2.Google Scholar

Oberthür, S., & Gehring, T. (2004). Reforming international environmental governance: An institutionalist critique of the proposal for a world environment organisation. International Environmental Agreements, 4, 359–81.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20, 550–7.Google Scholar

Palmer, G. (1992). New ways to make international environmental law. American Journal of International Law, 86, 259–83.Google Scholar

Paulus, A. (2005). Jus cogens in a time of hegemony and fragmentation: An attempt at a reappraisal. Nordic Journal of International Law, 74, 297–334.Google Scholar

Pedersen, O. W. (2012). An international environmental court and international legalism. Journal of Environmental Law, 24, 547–58.Google Scholar

Sachs, J. D. (2015). Goal-based development and the SDGs: Implications for development finance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 31, 268–78.Google Scholar

Sand, P. H., & Wiener, J. B. (2016). Towards a new international law of the atmosphere. Tulsa Law Review, 7, 195–223.Google Scholar

Scanlon, Z. (2018). The art of ‘not undermining’: Possibilities within existing architecture to improve environmental protections in areas beyond national jurisdiction. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 75, 405–16.Google Scholar

Selin, H. (2010). Global governance of hazardous chemicals: Challenges of multilevel management. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Shelton, D. (2006). Normative hierarchy in international law. American Journal of International Law, 100, 291–323.Google Scholar

Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O. et al. (2016). Integration: The key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 13, 1–9.Google Scholar

Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J. et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 1259855.Google Scholar

Steinberg, R. (1998). Der ökologische Verfassungsstaat. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Stevens, C. (2018). Scales of integration for sustainable development governance. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 25, 1–8.Google Scholar

Stevens, C., & Kanie, N. (2016). The transformative potential of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). International Environmental Agreements, 16, 393–6.Google Scholar

Underdal, A., & Kim, R. E. (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals and multilateral agreements. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 241–58). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly (2018). Towards a global pact for the environment. UN Doc. A/RES/72/277.Google Scholar

Vidmar, J. (2012). Norm conflicts and hierarchy in international law: Towards a vertical international legal system? In De Wet, E, & Vidmar, J (eds.), Hierarchy in international law: The place of human rights (pp. 13–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vijge, M. J. (2013). The promise of new institutionalism: Explaining the absence of a W orld or United Nations Environment Organisation. International Environmental Agreements, 13 (2), 153–76.Google Scholar

Von Moltke, K. (2005). Clustering international environmental agreements as an alternative to a world environment organization. In Biermann, F, & Bauer, S (eds.), A world environment organization: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wiersema, A. (2009). The new international law-makers? Conferences of the parties to multilateral environmental agreements. Michigan Journal of International Law, 31, 231–87.Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., & Matz, N. (2003). Conflicts in international environmental law. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. (2008). The architecture of global environmental governance: Bringing science to bear on policy. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (1), 14–32.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. (2017). Conceptualization: Goal setting as a strategy for earth system governance In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation (pp. 31–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zelli, F., & van Asselt, H. (2013). The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance: Causes, consequences, and responses. Global Environmental Politics, 13 (3), 1–13.Google Scholar

Zürn, M., & Faude, B. (2013). On fragmentation, differentiation, and coordination. Global Environmental Politics, 13, 119–30.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part III - Policy Responses

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

Book contents

Part III - Policy Responses

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive