Book contents
- Aquinas on Efficient Causation and Causal Powers
- Aquinas on Efficient Causation and Causal Powers
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations for Aquinas’s Works
- Introduction
- Part I The Elements of Paradigm Instances of Efficient Causation
- Part II Complications
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 November 2022
Book contents
- Aquinas on Efficient Causation and Causal Powers
- Aquinas on Efficient Causation and Causal Powers
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations for Aquinas’s Works
- Introduction
- Part I The Elements of Paradigm Instances of Efficient Causation
- Part II Complications
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Aquinas on Efficient Causation and Causal Powers , pp. 230 - 237Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Primary Sources
Aristotle, , The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. McKeon, Richard (New York: Random House, 1941).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Aristoteles Latinus XXV 3 Metaphysica, lib. I–XIV. Recensio et Translatio Guillelmi de Moerbeka, 2 vols., ed. Vuillemin-Diem, Gudrun (Leiden: Brill, 1995).Google Scholar
Avicenna, , Liber de philosophia prima sive scientia divina, ed. Verbeke, Gérard (Leuven: Peeters, 1983).Google Scholar
Avicenna, Liber Primus Naturalium: Tractatus Secundus de Motu et de Consimilibus, ed. Van Riet, Simone, Janssens, Jules L. Allard, André and Verbeke, Gérard (Brussels: Académie Royale de Belgique, 2006).Google Scholar
Pattin, Adriaan (ed.), “Le Liber de causis : Édition établie à l’aide de 90 manuscrits avec introduction et notes par A. Pattin O.M.L.,” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 28 (1966): 90–203.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius, , De divinis nominibus, in Patrologiae cursus completus, Series Graeca, ed. Migne, J. P., vol. 3 (Paris, 1857).Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, , Opera omnia iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita (Rome: Ex Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide, 1888–).Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, , In quatuor libros Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi episcopi Parisiensis, ed. Mandonnet, Pierre and Moos, Marie Fabien (Paris: P. Lethielleux, 1929–47).Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, , In librum De causis expositio, ed. Saffrey, H. D. (Fribourg [Suisse] and Louvain: Société Philosophique-Nauwelaerts, 1954).Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, , Summa contra Gentiles, vols. 2–3, ed. Marc, P., Pera, C. and Caramello, P. (Taurini-Rome: Marietti, 1961).Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, , In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum expositio, ed. Cathala, M.-R. and Spiazzi, R. M. (Taurini-Rome: Marietti, 1964).Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, , Quaestiones disputatae de potentia, in Quaestiones disputatae, vol. 2, ed. Pession, P. M. (Taurini-Rome: Marietti, 1965), 1–276.Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, , Quaestiones disputatae de virtutibus, in Quaestiones disputatae, vol. 2, ed. Odetto, E. (Taurini-Rome: Marietti, 1965), 707–828.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Adams, Marilynn McCord, Some Later Medieval Theories of the Eucharist (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Albertson, J. S., “Instrumental Causality in St. Thomas,” New Scholasticism 28 (1954): 409–35.Google Scholar
Anjum, Rani Lill and Mumford, Stephen, What Tends to Be: The Philosophy of Dispositional Modality (London and New York: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M., What Is a Law of Nature? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldner, Stephen, “Albertus Magnus and the Categorization of Motion,” The Thomist 70 (2006): 203–35.Google Scholar
Bobik, Joseph, Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements: A Translation and Interpretation of the de Principiis Naturae and the de Mixtione Elementorum of St. Thomas Aquinas (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Boland, Vivian, “Aquinas and Simplicius on Dispositions,” New Blackfriars 82 (2001): 467–78.Google Scholar
Brock, Stephen, Action and Conduct: Thomas Aquinas and the Theory of Action (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000).Google Scholar
Brock, Stephen, “Causality and Necessity in Thomas Aquinas,” Quaestio 2:1 (2002): 217–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey E., Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Brower-Toland, Susan, “Causation and Mental Content: Against the Externalist Reading of Ockham,” in Pelletier, Jenny and Roques, Magali (eds.), The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Claude Panaccio (Cham: Springer, 2017), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, David, “Aquinas and Jewish and Islamic Authors,” in Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 65–72.Google Scholar
Calma, Dragos (ed.), Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes Volume 1: Western Scholarly Networks and Debates (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar
Carl, Brian, “Action, Supposit, Subject: Interpreting Actiones Sunt Suppositorum,” Nova et Vetera 17:2 (2019): 545–65.Google Scholar
Carl, Brian, “Thomas Aquinas on the Proportionate Causes of Living Species,” Scientia et Fides 8:2 (2020): 223–48.Google Scholar
Clarke, Norris, “Action as the Self-Revelation of Being: A Central Theme in the Thought of St. Thomas,” in Explorations in Metaphysics (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994), 45–64.Google Scholar
Cory, David, “Thomas Aquinas on How the Soul Moves the Body,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 8 (2020): 146–87.Google Scholar
Cory, Therese Scarpelli, Aquinas on Human Self-Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Cory, Therese Scarpelli, “Rethinking Abstractionism: Aquinas’s Intellectual Light and Some Arabic Sources,” Journal for the History of Philosophy 53:4 (2015): 607–46.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William, “Covenant and Causality in Pierre D’Ailly,” Speculum 46:1 (1971): 94–119.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William, “The King and the Leaden Coin: The Economic Background of ‘Sine Qua Non’ Causality,” Traditio 28 (1972): 185–209.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard, “Accidents, Substantial Forms, and Causal Powers in the Late Thirteenth Century: Some Reflections on the Axiom ‘actiones sunt suppositorum,’” in Erismann, Christophe and Schniewind, Alexandrine (eds.), Compléments de substance: études sur les propriétés accidentelles offertes à Alain de Libera (Paris: Vrin, 2008), 133–46.Google Scholar
de Libera, Alain, “Les actions appartiennent aux sujets: petite archéologie d’un principe leibnizien,” in Caroti, Stefano et al. (eds.), Ad ingenii acuitionem: Studies in Honor of Alfonso Maierù (Louvain-La-Neuve, BE: Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Etudes Médiévales, 2007), 199–219.Google Scholar
Decaen, Christopher, “Elemental Virtual Presence in St. Thomas,” The Thomist 64:2 (2000): 271–300.Google Scholar
Decaen, Christopher, “An Inductive Study of the Notion of Equivocal Causality in St. Thomas,” The Thomist 79:2 (2015): 213–63.Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis, Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Dodds, Michael J., Unlocking Divine Action: Contemporary Science and Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Doig, James, “Aquinas and Aristotle,” in Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 33–41.Google Scholar
Doolan, Gregory, Aquinas on Divine Ideas as Exemplar Causes (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio, Participation et causalité selon St. Thomas D’aquin (Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain, 1961).Google Scholar
Fakhry, M., Islamic Occasionalism and Its Critique by Averroës and Aquinas (London: Routledge, 1958).Google Scholar
Finance, Joseph, Être et agir dans la philosophie de Saint Thomas (Paris: Beauchesne, 1945).Google Scholar
Fisher, Kendall, “Thomas Aquinas on Hylomorphism and the In-Act Principle,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25:6 (2017): 1053–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Antonia, Thomas Aquinas on Bodily Identity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Gloria, “Aquinas’s Ontology of Transeunt Causal Activity,” Vivarium 56 (2018): 47–82.Google Scholar
Frost, Gloria, “Aquinas on the Intension and Remission of Accidental Forms,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 7 (2019): 116–46.Google Scholar
Frost, Gloria, “What Is an Action? Peter Auriol vs. Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysics of Causality,” Ergo 6:43 (2020): 1259–85.Google Scholar
Frost, Gloria, “Three Competing Views of God’s Causation of Creaturely Actions: Aquinas, Scotus and Olivi,” in Ganssle, Gregory (ed.), Divine Causation (New York: Routledge, 2021), 66–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddu, André, “William of Ockham’s Arguments for Action at a Distance,” Franciscan Studies 44 (1984): 227–44.Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne, “Aquinas, Plato, and Neo-Platonism,” in Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 55–64.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel, Causal Asymmetries, Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction and Decision Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 36–54.Google Scholar
Heinaman, R., “Is Aristotle’s Definition of Change Circular?” Apeiron 27:1 (1994): 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Paul, “Does Efficient Causation Presuppose Final Causation? Aquinas vs. Early Modern Mechanism,” in Jorgensen, Larry and Newlands, Samuel (eds.), Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 297–312.Google Scholar
Huisman, Tyler, “Aristotle on Accidental Causation,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (2016): 561–75.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K., The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Johnson, Joel, “Final Causality in the Thought of Thomas Aquinas,” PhD diss., Purdue University, 2018, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 10840028.Google Scholar
Kane, W. Declan, “The Subject of Predicamental Action according to John of St. Thomas,” The Thomist 22:3 (1959): 66–388.Google Scholar
Kedar, Yael, “Laying the Foundation for the Nomological Image of Nature: From Corporeity in Robert Grosseteste (c. 1168–1253) to Species in Roger Bacon (1220–1292),” in Cunningham, J. P. (ed.), Robert Grosseteste and the Pursuit of Religious and Scientific Learning in the Middle-Ages (New York: Springer, 2016), 165–85.Google Scholar
Keele, Rondo, “Can God Make a Picasso? William Ockham and Walter Chatton on Divine Power and Real Relations,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45:3 (2007): 395–411.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie, “Dispositions and Moral Fallibility: The UnAristotelian Aquinas,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (2012): 141–57.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie, “Losable Virtue: Aquinas on Character and Will,” in Hoffmann, Tobias, Muller, Jorn and Perkams, Matthias (eds.), Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Matthew, “Prime Matter according to St. Thomas,” PhD diss., Fordham University, 2006, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 3201130.Google Scholar
Kim, Yul, “Why Does the Wood Not Ignite Itself? Duns Scotus’s Defense of the Will’s Self-Motion,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 95:1 (2021): 49–68.Google Scholar
King, Peter, “Duns Scotus on the Reality of Self-Change,” in Gill, Mary Louise and Lennox, James (eds.), Self-Motion from Aristotle to Newton (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), 227–90.Google Scholar
Kovach, Francis J., “Aquinas’s Theory of Action at a Distance: A Critical Analysis,” in Scholastic Challenges to Mediaeval and Modern Ideas (Stillwater, OK: Western Publications, 1987), 147–78.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman, “A General Problem of Creation,” in MacDonald, Scott (ed.), Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991), 208–28.Google Scholar
Künzle, P., Das Verhältnis der Seele zu ihren Potenzen: Problemgeschichtliche Untersuchungen von Augustin bis und mit Thomas von Aquin (Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 1956).Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik, “The Unity of Efficient and Final Causality: The Mind/Body Problem Reconsidered,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19:4 (2011): 587–603.Google Scholar
Lisska, Anthony J., Aquinas’s Theory of Perception (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Little, Ambrose, “Are You What You Eat or Something More?,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92:1 (2018): 1–20.Google Scholar
Lonergan, Bernard, Grace and Freedom: Operative Grace in the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas, in The Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, vol. 1, ed. Crowe, Frederick and Doran, Robert (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Lorkowski, C. M., “Hume, David: Causation,” in The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.iep.utm.edu/, accessed April 1, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur, The Great Chain of Being: The Study of the History of an Idea (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Löwe, Can Laurens, “Mind over Matter: Aquinas’s Transformation of Aristotle’s Definition of Change,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 82:1 (2015): 45–68.Google Scholar
Löwe, Can Laurens, “Peter Auriol on the Metaphysics of Efficient Causation,” Vivarium 55:4 (2017): 239–72.Google Scholar
Löwe, Can Laurens, “Aristotle and John Buridan on the Individuation of Causal Powers,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 6 (2018): 189–222.Google Scholar
Löwe, Can Laurens, “John Duns Scotus versus Thomas Aquinas on Action–Passion Identity,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26:6 (2018): 1027–44.Google Scholar
Löwe, Can Laurens, Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Human Act (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Reginald, The Cleansing of the Heart: The Sacraments as Instrumental Causes in the Thomistic Tradition (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott, “Aquinas’s Parasitic Cosmological Argument,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1 (1991): 119–55.Google Scholar
Majcherek, Kamil, “Walter Chatton’s Rejection of Final Causality,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 7 (2019): 212–42.Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese, “Causes, Forces and Resistance,” in On the Threshold of Exact Science, trans. Steven Sargent (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982), 40–60.Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese, “The Theory of the Elements and the Problem of Their Presence in Compounds,” in On the Threshold of Exact Science, trans. Steven Sargent (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982), 124–42.Google Scholar
Makin, Stephen, “Aquinas, Natural Tendencies, and Natural Kinds,” New Scholasticism 63.3 (1989): 253–74.Google Scholar
McDermott, Timothy, “The Subject of Predicamental Action,” The Thomist 23 (1960): 189–210.Google Scholar
Meehan, Francis X., Efficient Causality in Aristotle and St. Thomas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Miller, Marianne T., “The Problem of Action in the Commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas on the Physics of Aristotle,” Modern Schoolman, 23:3–4 (1946): 135–67; 200–26.Google Scholar
Morris, William Edward and Charlotte R., Brown, “David Hume,” in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), ehttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume/, accessed May 31, 2021.Google Scholar
Mumford, “The Power of Power,” in Groff, Ruth and Greco, John (eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 2013), 9–24.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen and Anjum, Rani Lill, “The Irreducibility of Dispositionalism,” in Hüntelmann, Rafael and Hattler, Johannes (eds.), New Scholasticism Meets Analytic Philosophy (Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae, 2014), 105–28.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven, “No Necessary Connection: The Medieval Roots of the Occasionalist Roots of Hume,” The Monist 79:3 (1996): 462–63.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven, “Malebranche on Causation,” in Nadler, Steven (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 112–38.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven, “Doctrines of Explanation in Late Scholasticism and Mechanical Philosophy,” in Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers (eds.), Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 513–52.Google Scholar
Ott, Walter R., Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Paasch, J. T., Divine Production in Late Medieval Trinitarian Theology: Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Page, Ben, “Thomas Aquinas, ‘the Greatest Advocate of Dispositional Modality’,” Studia Neoaristotelica 14:2 (2017): 167–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasnau, Robert, “Intentionality and Final Causes,” in Perler, Dominik (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (Leiden: Brill, 2001), 301–23.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert, Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa Theologiae 1a, 75–89 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert, “Scholastic Qualities, Primary and Secondary,” in Nolan, Lawrence (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasnau, Robert, Metaphysical Themes: 1274–1671 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert, “Teleology in the Later Middle Ages,” in McDonough, Jeffrey (ed.), Teleology: A History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 90–115.Google Scholar
Pawl, Timothy, “The Five Ways,” in Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 115–31.Google Scholar
Péghaire, Julien, “L’axiome ‘bonum est diffusivum sui’ dans le néoplatonisme et le thomisme,” Revue de l’Université d’Ottawa 1 (1932): 5–30.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik and Ulrich, Rudolph, Occasionalismus: Theorien der Kausalität im arabisch-islamischen und im europäischen Denken (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000).Google Scholar
Pierson, Daniel, “Thomas Aquinas on the Principle omne agens agit sibi simile,” PhD diss., Catholic University of America, 2015, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 3705731.Google Scholar
Pilsner, Joseph, The Specification of Human Actions in St. Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Richardson, Kara, “Avicenna’s Conception of the Efficient Cause,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2013): 220–39.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kara, “Causation in Arabic and Islamic Thought,” in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/arabic-islamic-causation/, accessed May 31, 2021.Google Scholar
Rosemann, Philip, Omne agens agit sibi simile: A “Repetition” of Scholastic Metaphysics (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Rota, Michael, “Causation,” in Davies, Brian and Stump (, Eleonoreeds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 104–14.Google Scholar
Russell, John, “Action and Reaction before Newton,” British Journal for the History of Science 9:1 (1976): 25–38.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, Andrea, “Sine qua non Causation: The Legacy of Malebranche’s Occasionalism in Kant’s New Elucidation,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 9 (2018): 215–48.Google Scholar
Schmid, Stephan, “Teleology and the Dispositional theory of Causation in Thomas Aquinas,” Logical Analysis and the History of Philosophy 14 (2011): 21–39.Google Scholar
Shanley, Brian, “Divine Causation and Human Freedom in Aquinas,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72:1 (1998): 99–122.Google Scholar
Solère, Jean-Luc, “Scotus versus Aquinas on Instrumental Causality,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 7 (2019): 147–85.Google Scholar
Storck, Michael Hector, “Parts, Wholes, and Presence by Power: A Response to Gordon P. Barnes,” Review of Metaphysics 62:1 (2008): 45–59.Google Scholar
Swanstrom, Julie, “Creation as Efficient Causation in Aquinas,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93:1 (2019): 1–27.Google Scholar
Tomarchio, John, “Four Indices for the Thomistic Principle Quod recipitur in aliquo est in eo per modum recipientis,” Mediaeval Studies 60:1 (1998): 315–67.Google Scholar
Tomarchio, John, “Thomistic Axiomatics in an Age of Computers,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 16:3 (1999): 249–75.Google Scholar
Tomarchio, John, “Aquinas’s Division of Being according to Modes of Existing,” Review of Metaphysics 54:3 (2001): 585–613.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre, Saint Thomas Aquinas: The Person and His Work (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press of America, 1996).Google Scholar
Toth, Zita, “Medieval Problems of Secondary Causation and Divine Concurrence,” PhD diss., Fordham University, 2017, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 10273316.Google Scholar
Trifolgi, Cecilia, “Thomas Wylton on Motion,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77:2 (1995): 135–54.Google Scholar
Tuttle, Jake, “Suárez’s Non-Reductive Theory of Efficient Causation,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 4 (2016): 125–58.Google Scholar
Vucu, Simona, “Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus on Self-agency and Self-motion: An Inquiry into the Medieval Metaphysics of Causal Powers,” PhD diss., University of Toronto, 2018, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 10641101.Google Scholar
Watts, Jordan, “Natural Final Causality at the University of Paris from 1250 – 1360,” PhD diss., The Catholic University of America, 2015, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 3705758.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James, “The Principle Omne quod movetur ab alio movetur in Medieval Physics,” Isis 56 (1965): 36–45.Google Scholar
Wippel, John, “Thomas Aquinas’s Derivation of the Aristotelian Categories (Predicaments),” Journal of the History of Philosophy 25:1 (1987): 13–34.Google Scholar
Wippel, John, The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Wippel, John, “Aquinas on God’s Freedom to Create or Not,” in Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007), 218–39.Google Scholar
Wippel, John, “Thomas Aquinas and the Axiom ‘What Is Received Is Received According to the Mode of the Receiver’,” in Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007), 113–22.Google Scholar
Wood, Adam, “The Faculties of the Soul and Some Medieval Mind–Body Problems,” The Thomist 75 (2011): 585–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Rega, “The Influence of Arabic Aristotelianism on Scholastic Natural Philosophy,” in Pasnau, Robert and Van Dyke, Christina (eds.), The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 247–66.Google Scholar