Book contents
- Approaches to Lucretius
- Approaches to Lucretius
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Text
- Part II Lucretius and his Readers
- Part III The Word and the World
- Part IV Literary and Philosophical Sources
- Part V Worldviews
- Works Cited
- Index Locorum
- Index Rerum
- References
Works Cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2020
Edited by
Book contents
- Approaches to Lucretius
- Approaches to Lucretius
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Text
- Part II Lucretius and his Readers
- Part III The Word and the World
- Part IV Literary and Philosophical Sources
- Part V Worldviews
- Works Cited
- Index Locorum
- Index Rerum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Approaches to LucretiusTraditions and Innovations in Reading the <I>De Rerum Natura</I>, pp. 282 - 312Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Works Cited
Achtner, W. (2011) ‘Infinity as a transformative concept in science and theology’, in Heller, M. and Woodin, W. (eds.) Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge: 19–51.Google Scholar
Adler, A. (2012) ‘Sensual idealism: the spirit of Epicurus and the politics of finitude in Kant and Hölderlin’, in Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H. (eds.) Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism. New York, NY and Oxford: 199–238.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (2011) The Sacrament of Language: An Archaeology of the Oath. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Alfonsi, L. (1978) ‘L’avventura di Lucrezio nel mondo antico … e oltre’, in Gigon, O. (ed.) Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur L’Antiquité Classique 24. Geneva: 271–321.Google Scholar
Algra, K., Koenen, M. and Schrijvers, P. (eds.) (1997) Lucretius and his Intellectual Background. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1995) Review of M. R. Gale (1994) Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. BMCRev 95.04.08.Google Scholar
Arenson, K. (2016) ‘Epicureans on marriage as sexual therapy’, Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 2.33: 291–311.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (1995) ‘The impossibility of metathesis: Philodemus and Lucretius on form and content in poetry’, in Obbink, D. (ed.) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford and New York, NY: 210–32.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (2013) Review of H. Essler (2011) Glückselig und unsterblich: Epikureische Theologie bei Cicero and Philodem (mit einer Edition von PHerc. 152/157, Kol. 8–10). BMCRev 2013.02.37.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) (2004) Vergil, Philodemus and the Augustans. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1955) ‘Filodemo Περὶ θεῶν III fr. 74–82, Pap. Herc. 157’, PP 10: 322–56.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (2000) ‘Filodemo fra poesia, mito e storia’, in Erler, M. (ed.) Epikureismus in der späten Republik und der Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart: 13–31.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1970) The Epicurean Theory of Free Will and its Origins in Aristotle. Diss. Yale.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1982) ‘Lucretius’ Venus and Stoic Zeus’, Hermes 110.4: 458–70. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 88–103.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1991) ‘Philodemus’s poetic theory and On the Good King According to Homer’, ClAnt 10: 1–45.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1995) ‘Epicurean poetics’, in Obbink, D. (ed.) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford and New York, NY: 15–34.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1999) ‘Epicurean epistemology’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 260–94.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2008a) ‘Lucretius’ new world order: making a pact with nature’, CQ 58: 141–57.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2011) Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Avotins, I. (1983) ‘Some Epicurean and Lucretian arguments for the infinity of the universe’, CQ 33: 421–7.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (ed.) (1922) Lucreti De Rerum Natura Libri Sex (2nd edn.; 1st edn. 1900). Oxford.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1940) ‘The mind of Lucretius’, TAPhA 61: 278–91. Repr. in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 3–16.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (ed., trans.) (1947) Titi Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex, edited, with prolegomena, critical apparatus, translation and commentary. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Baker, E. (2007) ‘Lucretius in the European Enlightenment’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 274–88.Google Scholar
Bakker, F. A. (2018) ‘The end of Epicurean infinity: critical reflections on the Epicurean infinite universe’, in Bakker, F. A., Bellis, D. and Palmerino, C. (eds.) Space, Imagination and the Cosmos from Antiquity to the Early Modern Period. Cham: 41–67.Google Scholar
Barbour, R. (2007) ‘Moral and political philosophy: readings of Lucretius from Virgil to Voltaire’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 149–66.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1999) ‘Venus’ masterplot: Ovid and the Homeric Hymns’, in Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A. and Hinds, S. (eds.) Ovidian Transformations. Essays on the Metamorphoses and its Reception. Cambridge: 112–26.Google Scholar
Baron, E. P. (1986) Lucretius and his Reader: A Study of Book II of De Rerum Natura. Diss. Ohio.Google Scholar
Baronovitch, L. (1984) ‘German idealism, Greek materialism, and the young Karl Marx’, International Philosophical Quarterly 24: 245–66.Google Scholar
Barrow, J. D. (2005) The Infinite Book: A Short Guide to the Boundless, Timeless and Endless. London.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1971) ‘De l’œuvre au texte’, Revue d’esthétique 3. Trans. in R. Barthes (1977) Image – Music – Text. Ed. and trans. S. Heath. New York, NY: 155–64: ‘From work to text’.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1995) ‘The death of the author’, in Burke, S. (ed.) Authorship: From Plato to Postmodernism, A Reader. Edinburgh: 125–30.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2009) ‘The Infinity of Lists by Umberto Eco: Is there still life in the list?’, Guardian, 12 December 2009.Google Scholar
Beer, B. (2009) Lukrez und Philodem. Poetische Argumentation und Poetologischer Diskurs. Basel.Google Scholar
Belpaeme, T., Cowley, S. J. and MacDorman, K. F. (eds.) (2007) Symbol Grounding. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2005) Ciues Epicurei: Les épicuriens et l'idée de la monarchie à Rome et en Italie de Sylla à Octave. Brussels.Google Scholar
Benveniste, É. (1964) ‘Lettres de Ferdinand de Saussure à Antoine Meillet’, Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 21: 93–130.Google Scholar
Bersanelli, M. (2011) ‘Infinity and the nostalgia of the stars’, in Heller, M. and Woodin, W. (eds.) Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge: 193–217.Google Scholar
Bignone, E. (1919) ‘Nuove ricerche sul proemio del poema di Lucrezio’, RFIC 47: 423–33.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. (1973) The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. New York, NY and Oxford.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. (2011) The Anatomy of Influence: Literature as a Way of Life. New Haven, CT and London.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (1987) Das Lachen der Thrakerin. Eine Urgeschichte der Theorie. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (2015) The Laughter of the Thracian Woman: A Protohistory of Theory. New York, NY, London, New Delhi and Sydney.Google Scholar
Bockemüller, F. (ed.) (1873–4) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. 2 vols. Stade.Google Scholar
Booth, W. (2005) ‘Resurrection of the implied author: why bother?’, in Phelan, J. and Rabinowitz, P. J. (eds.) A Companion to Narrative Theory. Oxford: 75–88.Google Scholar
Borch-Jacobsen, M. (2001) ‘Making psychiatric history: madness as folie à plusieurs’, History of the Human Sciences 14: 19–38.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. W. (1997) Ovid’s Literary Loves: Influence and Innovation in the Amores. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Breed, B. (2000) ‘Imitations of originality: Theocritus and Lucretius at the start of the Eclogues’, Vergilius 46: 3–20.Google Scholar
Breed, B. (2006) Pastoral Inscriptions: Reading and Writing Virgil’s Eclogues. London.Google Scholar
Brieger, A. (ed.) (1899) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex (2nd edn.; 1st edn. 1894). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bright, D. F. (1971) ‘The plague and the structure of De rerum natura’, Latomus 30: 607–32.Google Scholar
Brown, R. D. (1982) ‘Lucretius and Callimachus’, ICS 7: 77–97. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 328–50.Google Scholar
Brown, R. D. (ed., trans.) (1987) Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura IV, 1030–1287 with Prolegomena, Text, and Translation. Leiden.Google Scholar
Browning, G. K. (2000) ‘Marx’s doctoral dissertation: the development of a Hegelian thesis’, in Burns, T. and Fraser, I. (eds.) The Hegel–Marx Connection. London: 131–45.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1971) ‘Epikurs Triumph des Geistes’, Hermes 99: 303–23. Trans. Reitz, B. in Gale, M. R. (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 104–31: ‘Epicurus’ triumph of the mind’ (with Addendum [2005]).Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1984) ‘Lukrez über den Ursprung von Musik und Dichtung’, RhM 127: 141–58.Google Scholar
Buckley, E. (2006) ‘Ending the Aeneid? Closure and continuation in Maffeo Vegio’s Supplementum’, Vergilius 52: 108–37.Google Scholar
Buglass, A. K. (2015) Repetition and Internal Allusion in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. Diss. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bury, R. (ed., trans.) (1952) Plato. Vol. VII: Timaeus, Critias, Cleitophon, Menexenus, Epistles. Loeb Classical Library 234. London and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. J. (2013) The Early Textual History of Lucretius’ De rerum natura. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. J. (2014) ‘Lucretius auctus? The question of interpolation in De rerum natura’, in Martínez, J. (ed.) Fakes and Forgers of Classical Literature: Ergo decipiatur! Leiden: 15–42.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. J. (2018) ‘Lucretius the madman and the gods’, in Bryan, J., Wardy, R. and Warren, J. (eds.) Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge: 222–41.Google Scholar
Cabisius, G. (1985) ‘Social metaphor and the atomic cycle in Lucretius’, CJ 80: 109–20.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (1999) Review of D. Sedley (1998) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. BMCRev 1999.10.29.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (2002) ‘Lucretius and the memes of prehistory’, LICS Discussion Paper 1, available at http://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/95/1/lucretius.pdf (accessed 20 August 2019).Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (2003) Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura 5.772–1104. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (2011) ‘Lucretius’, in Clayman, D. L. (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Classics, online at www.oxfordbibliographies.com.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (2014) ‘Lucretius, Empedocles and Cleanthes’, in Garani, M., Konstan, D. (eds.) The Philosophizing Muse: The Influence of Greek Philosophy on Roman Poetry. Newcastle: 26–60.Google Scholar
Canali, L. (1995) Nei pleniluni sereni. Autobiografia immaginaria di Tito Lucrezio Caro. Milan.Google Scholar
Canevaro, L. G. (2019) ‘Thinking for yourself: Hesiod’s Works and Days and cognitive training’, in Canevaro, L. G. and O’Rourke, D. (eds.) Didactic Poetry of Greece, Rome and Beyond: Knowledge, Power, Tradition. Swansea: 53–74.Google Scholar
Cangelosi, A. (2008) ‘The grounding and sharing of symbols’, in Dror, I. E. and Harnad, S. (eds.) Cognition Distributed: How Cognitive Technology Extends Our Minds. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: 83–92.Google Scholar
Castner, C. (1988) Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century bc to the Second Century ad. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Chatman, S. (1990) Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. F. (1943) ‘The biographical fashion in literary criticism’, University of California Publications in Classical Philology 12: 279–92.Google Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (2009) ‘Scientific antecedents of situated cognition’, in Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: 11–34.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2003) Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1968) ‘Poetry and rhetoric in Lucretius’, TAPhA 99: 77–118. Repr. in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 331–73.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. (2016) ‘The Hercules and Cacus episode in Augustan literature: engaging the Homeric Hymn to Hermes in light of Callimachus’ and Apollonius’ reception’, in Faulkner, A., Schwab, A. and Vergados, A. (eds.) The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 55–78.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1976) ‘The sources of Lucretius’ inspiration’, in Bollack, J. and Laks, A. (eds.) Études sur l’Epicurisme antique, Lille: 205–27. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 18–47.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (2000a) ‘Recovering originals: Peri Physeos and De Rerum Natura’, Apeiron 33: 259–71.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (2000b) Platonic Questions: Dialogues with the Silent Philosopher. Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Cole, T. (1998) ‘Venus and Mars (De Rerum Natura 1.31–40)’, in Knox, P. and Foss, C. (eds.) Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Stuttgart: 3–15.Google Scholar
Commager, H. S. Jr (1957) ‘Lucretius’ interpretation of the plague’, HSPh 62: 105–18. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 182–98.Google Scholar
Conington, J. and Nettleship, H. (eds.) (1881) P. Vergili Maronis Opera. The Works of Virgil. 3 vols. (4th edn.). London.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1985) Memoria dei poeti e sistema letterario: Catullo, Virgilio, Ovidio, Lucano. Turin.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and other Latin Poets. Ed. and trans. Segal, C.. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1990) ‘Introduzione’, in Dionigi, I. (ed.) and Canali, L. (trans.) (1990) Lucrezio, La Natura Delle Cose. 2 vols. (2nd edn. 2000). Milan: 7–47.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1994) Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia. Trans. Most, G. W.. Baltimore, MD and London.Google Scholar
Cox, A. (1971) ‘Lucretius and his message: a study in the prologues of the De Rerum Natura’, G&R 18: 1–16.Google Scholar
Craca, C. (1989) Da Epicuro a Lucrezio: Il maestro ed il poeta nei proemi del De rerum natura. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dalzell, A. (1974) ‘Lucretius’ exposition of the doctrine of images’, Hermathena 118: 22–32.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1940) ‘Similia dissimilia III: Zum 1. Prooemium des Lukrez’, RhM 89: 55–62.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. H. (1964) ‘Distant views: the imagery of Lucretius 2’, CJ 60: 49–55. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 146–57.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. H. (1983) ‘Lucretius and Plato’, in Συζήτησις. Studi sull'epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples: 291–307.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1903) Oeuvres de Descartes: Correspondence V: Mai 1647 – Février 1650. Ed. Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1996) Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Ed. and trans. Cottingham, J.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dionigi, I. (ed.) and Canali, L. (trans.) (1990) Lucrezio, La Natura Delle Cose. 2 vols. (2nd edn. 2000). Milan.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (1991) Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Doody, A. (2010) Pliny’s Encyclopedia: The Reception of the Natural History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dror, I. E. and Harnad, S. (2008) ‘Offloading cognition into cognitive technology’, in Dror, I. E. and Harnad, S. (eds.) Cognition Distributed: How Cognitive Technology Extends Our Minds. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: 1–23.Google Scholar
Dykes, A. (2011) Reading Sin in the World: The Hamartigenia of Prudentius and the Vocation of the Responsible Reader. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Earnshaw, K. (2013) ‘(First-) beginnings and (never-) endings in Lucan and Lucretius’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 261–84.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore, MD and London.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. (1993) ‘Aeternus lepos: Venus, Lucretius, and the fear of death’, G&R 40: 68–78.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1924) ‘Geleitwort’, in Lukrez, Von der Natur. Trans. Diels, H.. Berlin: via–vib.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1993) ‘Philologia medicans: wie die Epikureer die Texte ihres Meisters lasen’, in Kullmann, W. and Althoff, J. (eds.) Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur. Tübingen: 281–303.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. and Robin, L. (eds.) (1925–8) Lucrèce, De Rerum Natura: Commentaire Exégétique et Critique. Paris.Google Scholar
Essler, H. (2009) ‘Falsche Götter bei Philodem (Di III Kol. 8,5–Kol. 10,6)’, CronErc 39: 161–205.Google Scholar
Essler, H. (2011) Glückselig und unsterblich: Epikureische Theologie bei Cicero und Philodem (mit einer Edition von PHerc. 152/157, Kol. 8–10). Basel.Google Scholar
Essler, H. (2017) ‘Philodemus of Gadara’, in Clayman, D. (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Classics, online at www.oxfordbibliographies.com.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1990) ‘Epicurus on the truth of the senses’, in Everson, S. (ed.) Epistemology. Cambridge: 161–83.Google Scholar
Fabbri, R. (1984) ‘La “Vita Borgiana” di Lucrezio nel quadro delle biografie umanistiche’, Lettere Italiane 36: 348–66.Google Scholar
Fairclough, H. R. and Goold, G. P. (eds., trans.) (1999) Virgil, Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. L. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York, NY and Oxford.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2001) Latin Language and Latin Culture: From Ancient to Modern Times. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2007) ‘Lucretian architecture: the structure and argument of the De rerum natura’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 76–91.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2016) ‘Lucretius and the symptomatology of modernism’, in Lezra, J. and Blake, L. (eds.) (2016) Lucretius and Modernity. Epicurean Encounters across Time and Disciplines. New York, NY: 39–58.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. (2011b) ‘The collection of Homeric Hymns: from the seventh to the third centuries bc’, in The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: 175–205.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1989) Review of Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. JRS 79: 206–7.Google Scholar
Fenves, P. (1986) ‘Marx’s doctoral thesis on two Greek atomists and the post-Kantian interpretations’, JHI 47: 433–52.Google Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (2016) The Voices Within: The History and Science of How We Talk to Ourselves. London.Google Scholar
Fish, J. (2011) ‘Not all politicians are Sisyphus: what Roman Epicureans were taught about politics’, in Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R. (eds.) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge and New York, NY: 72–104.Google Scholar
Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R. (eds.) (2011) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (2016b) ‘Resonance: the sonic environment of Vergil’s Eclogues’, Dictynna 13, http://journals.openedition.org/dictynna/129 (accessed 2 September 2019).Google Scholar
Flores, E. (ed., trans.) (2002–9) Titus Lucretius Carus: De Rerum Natura. 3 vols. Naples.Google Scholar
Foster, E. (2009) ‘The rhetoric of materials: Thucydides and Lucretius’, AJPh 130: 367–99.Google Scholar
Foster, E. (2011) ‘The political aims of Lucretius’ translation of Thucydides’, in McElduff, S. and Sciarrino, E. (eds.) Complicating the History of Western Translation: The Ancient Mediterrannean in Perspective. Manchester: 88–100.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1983) ‘Lucretius on the clinamen and “free will” (II 251–93)’, in Gigante, M. (ed.) ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ: studi sull’epicureismo greco e latino offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples: 329–52. Repr. in D. Fowler (ed.) (2002) Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford: 407–27.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1989a) ‘Lucretius and politics’, in Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J. (eds.) Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford: 120–50. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 397–431.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1995) ‘From epos to cosmos: Lucretius, Ovid, and the poetics of segmentation’, in Innes, D. C., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.) Ethics and Rhetoric: Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford: 3–18.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1996) ‘The feminine principal: gender in the De rerum natura’, in Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M. (eds.) Epicureismo greco e romano: Atti del congresso internazionale, Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1993. 3 vols. Naples: 813–22. Repr. in D. Fowler (ed.) (2002) Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De rerum natura 2.1–332. Oxford: 444–52.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1997a) ‘On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and classical studies’, MD 39: 13–34.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1997b) ‘Second thoughts on closure’, in Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.) Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ: 3–22.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2000b) ‘Philosophy and literature in Lucretian intertextuality’, in Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford: 138–55.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2000c) ‘The didactic plot’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.) Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA: 205–19.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (ed.) (2002) Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De rerum natura 2.1–332. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, P. G. (1997) ‘Lucretian conclusions’, in Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.) Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ: 112–38. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 199–233.Google Scholar
Fratantuono, L. (2015) A Reading of Lucretius’ De rerum natura. Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, NY and London.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. (1939) ‘The Epicurean theology in Lucretius’ first proœmium (Lucr. I. 44–49)’, TAPhA 70: 368–79.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. (1941) ‘Patterns of sound and atomistic theory in Lucretius’, AJPh 62: 16–34. Repr. in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 291–307; M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 351–70.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. (1982) The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Fröhder, D. (1994) Die dichterische Form der Homerischen Hymnen: Untersucht am Typus der mittelgroßen Preislieder. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Furley, D. (1966) ‘Lucretius and the Stoics’, BICS 13: 13–33. Repr. in Furley, D. (ed.) (1989) Cosmic Problems. Cambridge: 183–205; C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 75–95.Google Scholar
Furley, D. (1970) ‘Variations on themes from Empedocles in Lucretius’ proem’, BICS 17: 55–64.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2001b) ‘Etymological wordplay and poetic succession in Lucretius’, CPh 96: 168–72.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2004) ‘The story of us: a narratological analysis of Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura’, in Gale, M. R. (ed.) Latin Epic and Didactic Poetry: Genre, Tradition and Individuality. Swansea: 49–71.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2005) ‘Avia Pieridum loca: tradition and innovation in Lucretius’, in Horster, M. and Reitz, Ch. (eds.) Wissensvermittlung in dichterischer Gestalt. Stuttgart: 175–91.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2007b) ‘Lucretius and previous poetic traditions’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 59–75.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2018) ‘Contemplating violence: Lucretius’ De rerum natura’, in Gale, M. R. and Scourfield, J. H. D. (eds.) Texts and Violence in the Roman World. Cambridge: 63–86.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2019) ‘Name puns and acrostics in didactic poetry: reading the universe’, in Canevaro, L. G. and O’Rourke, D. (eds.) Didactic Poetry of Greece, Rome and Beyond: Knowledge, Power, Tradition. Swansea: 123–50.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2009) ‘Philosophical antecedents of situated cognition’, in Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: 35–51.Google Scholar
Gandon, F. (2002) De dangereux édifices. Saussure lecteur de Lucrèce. Les cahiers d’anagrammes consacrés au De rerum natura. Leuven and Paris.Google Scholar
Gandon, F. (2006) Le nom de l’absent. Épistémologie de la science saussurienne des signes. Limoges.Google Scholar
Garani, M. (2007) Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and Analogy in Lucretius. New York, NY and London.Google Scholar
García Calvo, A. (ed., trans.) (1997) Lucrecio, De Rerum Natura (De la realidad). Zamora.Google Scholar
Garratt, P. (ed.) (2016) The Cognitive Humanities: Embodied Mind in Literature and Culture. London.Google Scholar
Gee, E. (2016) ‘Dogs, snakes and heroes: hybridism and polemic in Lucretius’ De rerum natura’, in Oakley, S. and Hunter, R. L. (eds.) Latin Literature and its Transmission: Papers in Honour of Michael Reeve. Cambridge: 108–41.Google Scholar
Gellar, T. (2012) Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura and Satire. Diss. North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1997) Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Trans. Newman, C. and Doubinsky, C.. Lincoln, NE and London.Google Scholar
Germany, R. (2005) ‘The figure of Echo in the Homeric Hymn to Pan’, AJPh 126: 187–208.Google Scholar
Giancotti, F. (1978) Il preludio di Lucrezio e altri scritti lucreziani ed epicurei. Messina and Florence.Google Scholar
Giancotti, F. (1980) ‘Il preludio di Lucrezio, il trasposizionismo e Lattanzio’, Orpheus 1: 221–50.Google Scholar
Giancotti, F. (ed., trans.) (1994) Tito Lucrezio Caro: La Natura. Introduzione, testo criticamente riveduto, traduzione e commento. Milan.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1989) ‘L’infinito nella fisica epicurea’, in Ceresa-Gastaldo, A. (ed.) L’infinito dei greci e dei romani. Genoa: 9–26.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1996) ‘Epicuro e l’ateismo antico’, in Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M. (eds.) Epicureismo greco e romano: Atti del congresso internazionale, Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1993. 3 vols. Naples: 21–63.Google Scholar
Giesecke, A. L. (2000) Atoms, Ataraxy, and Allusion: Cross-Generic Imitation of the De Rerum Natura in Early Augustan Poetry. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Gifanius, O. (1595) Titi Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex (2nd edn.; 1st edn. Antwerp, 1565). Leiden.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (ed.) (1983b) ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ: studi sull’epicureismo greco e latino offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1995) Philodemus in Italy: The Books from Herculaneum. Trans. Obbink, D.. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. (1978) ‘Lukrez und Ennius’, in Gigon, O. (ed.) Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur L’Antiquité Classique 24. Geneva: 167–91.Google Scholar
Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) (2007) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gillespie, S. and Mackenzie, D. (2007) ‘Lucretius and the moderns’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 306–24.Google Scholar
Giuffrida, P. (1940–50) L’epicureismo nella letteratura latina nel 1 sec. av. Cristo. 2 vols. Turin.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. (2009) The Seeds of Things: Theorizing Sexuality and Materiality in Renaissance Representations. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, N. (2019) Afterlives of the Roman Poets: Biofiction and the Reception of Latin Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (2002) ‘Some unseen monster: rereading Lucretius on sex’, in Fredrick, D. (ed.) The Roman Gaze. Vision, Power and the Body. Baltimore, MD: 86–109.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1996) ‘Philosophical innovations in Lucretius?’, in Algra, K. A., van der Horst, P. W. and Runia, D. T. (eds.) Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on His Sixtieth Birthday. Leiden: 231–40.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. (2005) Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Grewing, F., Acosta-Hughes, B. and Kirichenko, A. (eds.) (2013) The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1978) ‘Le poème de Lucrèce en son temps’, in Gigon, O. (ed.) Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur L’Antiquité Classique 24. Geneva: 233–70.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1969) ‘The consular elections for 53 bc’, in Brabauw, J. (ed.) Hommages à Marcel Renard. Collection Latomus 101. 2 vols. Brussels: 2.311–21.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, H. U. (2004) Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Hahmann, A. (2015) ‘Epikur über den Gegenstand der Wahrnehmung’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 97: 271–307.Google Scholar
Hammerstaedt, J. (2003) ‘Une ancienne discussion sur les critères de l’excellence du poème (éd. Philodème, Poèmes V, PHerc. 1425 col. XXV sq. Réexamen de Mangoni)’, in Monet, A. (ed.) Le Jardin romain: Épicurisme et poésie à Rome. Mélanges offerts à Mayotte Bollack. Lille: 303–17.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2013) ‘Lucretius, Epicurus, and the logic of multiple explanations’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) (2013) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 69–98.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1985) ‘Imago mundi: cosmological and ideological aspects of the shield of Aeneas’, JHS 105: 11–31.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2009) Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harnad, S. (ed.) (1987) Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition. Cambridge and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2016) ‘The Homeric Hymns and Horatian lyric’, in Faulkner, A., Schwab, A. and Vergados, A. (eds.) The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 79–94.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2007) ‘Religion and enlightenment in the neo-Latin reception of Lucretius’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 185–201.Google Scholar
Haugeland, J. (1998) Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Haugeland, J. (2002) ‘Andy Clark on cognition and representation’, in Caplin, H. (ed.) Philosophy of Mental Representation. Oxford and New York, NY: 24–36.Google Scholar
Heerink, M. (2015) Echoing Hylas: A Study in Hellenistic and Roman Metapoetics. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1833) Werke. Vol. 14 (= Michelet, K. L. (ed.) Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Vol. 2. Berlin.)Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1995) Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Trans. E. S. Haldane and F. H. Simson (based on Hegel’s Geschichte der Philosophie 1840). Lincoln, NE and London.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1996) Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie Part III: Griechische Philosophie II. Plato bis Proklos, eds. Garniron, P. and Jaeschke, W.. Hamburg. Trans. Brown, R. F. and Stewart, J. M. (2006) Lectures on the History of Philosophy 1825–6. Vol. II. Oxford.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2011) ‘The nature of man: Pliny, Historia Naturalis as cosmogram’, MD 66: 139–72.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2016) ‘Cicero’s letters to Cicero, ad QFr: big brothers keepers’, Arethusa 49.3: 439–61.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1987) The Metamorphosis of Persephone. Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hollander, J. (1981) The Figure of Echo. A Mode of Allusion in Milton and After. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. (2012) ‘Deleuze, Lucretius, and the simulacrum of naturalism’, in Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H. (eds.) Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism. New York, NY and Oxford: 316–42.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. (2016) ‘Michel Serres’s non-modern Lucretius: manifold reason and the temporality of reception’, in Lezra, J. and Blake, L. (eds.) Lucretius and Modernity. Epicurean Encounters across Time and Disciplines. New York, NY: 21–37.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H. (eds.) (2012) Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism. New York, NY and Oxford.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (1998) ‘Ter quinque volumina as carmen perpetuum: the division into books in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, MD 40: 77–98.Google Scholar
Hopkins, D. (2007) ‘The English voices of Lucretius from Lucy Hutchinson to John Mason good’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 254–73.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1995) ‘Written in the stars: poetry and philosophy in Aratus’ Phaenomena’, Arachnion 2: 1–34.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995b) ‘How a cockpit remembers its speed’, Cognitive Science 19: 265–88.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1978) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD and London.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1982) Homer, Hesiod, and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Epic Diction. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (ed., trans.) (2000) Philodemus: On Poems Book 1, Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (ed., trans.) (2011) Philodemus: On Poems Books 3–4 with the Fragments of Aristotle, On Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jebb, R. C. (1868) ‘On Mr. Tennyson’s “Lucretius”’, Macmillan’s Magazine, June 1868, 28.104: 97–103.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. and Wilson, C. (2007) ‘Lucretius and the history of science’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 131–48.Google Scholar
Jones, R. M. (1926) ‘Posidonius and the flight of the mind through the universe’, CPh 21.2: 97–113.Google Scholar
Jope, J. (1983) ‘Lucretius’ psychoanalytic insight: his notion of unconscious motivation’, Phoenix 37: 224–38.Google Scholar
Katz, J. T. (2013) ‘Saussure’s anaphonie: sounds asunder’, in Butler, S. and Purves, A. (eds.) Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses. Durham: 167–84.Google Scholar
Katz, J. T. (2015) ‘Saussure at play and his structuralist and post-structuralist interpreters’, Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 68: 113–32.Google Scholar
Keen, R. (1981) ‘Lexical note to the Epicurean doctrine of perception’, Apeiron 15: 59–69.Google Scholar
Kegel-Brinkgreve, E. (1990) The Echoing Woods. Bucolic and Pastoral from Theocritus to Wordsworth. Leiden.Google Scholar
Keith, A. (2016) ‘The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite in Ovid and Augustan literature’, in Faulkner, A., Schwab, A. and Vergados, A. (eds.) The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 109–25.Google Scholar
Kelsey, F. W. (ed.) (1884) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Boston, MA and Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2000) ‘Making a text of the universe: perspectives on discursive order in the De Rerum Natura of Lucretius’, in Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds.) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Oxford: 205–25. Repr. in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 376–96 (with Addendum [2005]).Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2002) Rethinking Reality: Lucretius and the Textualization of Nature. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2008) ‘Atoms, individuals, and myths’, in Zajko, V. and Leonard, M. (eds.) Laughing with Medusa: Classical Myth and Psychoanalysis. Oxford: 233–52.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2013) ‘The political epistemology of infinity’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) (2013) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 51–67.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2015) ‘Lucretius’, in Pritchard, D. (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Classics, online at www.oxfordbibliographies.com.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2020) ‘Metalepsis and metaphysics’, in Matzner, S. and Trimble, G. (eds.) Metalepsis: Ancient Texts, New Perspectives. Oxford: 223–45.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1970) ‘Doctus Lucretius’, Mnemosyne 23: 366–92. Repr. with addenda in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 237–65; M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 300–27.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (ed.) (2014) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura Book III. 2nd edn. (1st edn. 1984). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keyser, C. J. (1919) ‘The rôle of the concept of infinity in the work of Lucretius’, Classical Weekly 12.13: 102–4.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, R. S. (1996) ‘Amicus medicus: medicine and Epicurean therapy in De Rerum Natura’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 41: 69–100.Google Scholar
Kindt, T. and Mueller, H.-H. (2008) The Implied Author: Concept and Controversy. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M. (1983) The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd edn. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kirsh, D. (2006) ‘Distributed cognition: a methodological note’, Pragmatics & Cognition 14: 249–62.Google Scholar
Kleve, K. (1979a) ‘The Epicurean isonomia and its sceptical refutation’, SO 54: 27–35.Google Scholar
Koenen, M. H. (1997) ‘Lucretius’ olfactory theory in De rerum natura IV’, in Algra, K., Koenen, M. and Schrijvers, P. (eds.) Lucretius and his Intellectual Background. Amsterdam: 163–77.Google Scholar
Koenen, M. H. (2004) ‘Loca loquuntur. Lucretius’ explanation of the echo and other acoustic phenomena in DRN 4.563–614’, Mnemosyne 57: 698–724.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2004) ‘“The birth of the reader”: Plutarch as a literary critic’, Scholia 13: 3–27.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2008) A Life Worthy of the Gods: The Materialist Psychology of Epicurus. Las Vegas, NV, Zurich and Athens.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2009) ‘De Sócrates a Descartes: hablar, leer y la naturaleza de la Filosofía’, Nova Tellus 27: 1–20.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2011) ‘Epicurus on the gods’, in Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R. (eds.) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge and New York, NY: 53–71.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2013) ‘Lucretius and the Epicurean attitude towards grief’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 193–210.Google Scholar
Konstan, D., Clay, D., Glad, C. E., Thom, J. C. and Ware, J. (eds.) (1998) Philodemus: On Frank Criticism. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Krämer, S. (2016) ‘Is there a diagrammatical impulse in Plato? “Quasi-diagrammatical-scenes” in Plato’s philosophy’, in Krämer, S. and Ljungberg, C. (eds.) Thinking with Diagrams: The Semiotic Basis of Human Cognition. Berlin, Boston, MA, Beijing: 163–77.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. B. (2013) ‘Caesar, Lucretius and the dates of De rerum natura and the Commentarii’, CQ 63: 772–9.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. (1955) Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre. 2nd edn. Leverkusen.Google Scholar
Kyriakidis, S. (2006) ‘Lucretius’ DRN 1.926–50 and the proem to Book 4’, CQ 56: 606–10.Google Scholar
Kyriakidis, S. (2007) Catalogues of Proper Names in Latin Epic Poetry: Lucretius, Virgil, Ovid. Newcastle.Google Scholar
Lachmann, K. (ed.) (1850) T. Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura Libri VI. Berlin. Index by Harder, F. (1882). Berlin.Google Scholar
Lambinus, D. (ed.) (1570) T. Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura Libri VI (3rd edn.; 1st edn. 1563–4). Paris.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1995) ‘Cogito ergo sumus! Or psychology swept inside out by the fresh air of the upper deck: review of Hutchins 1995’, Mind, Culture, and Activity 3: 54–63.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2004) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2010) ‘Coming out as a philosopher’, Social Studies of Science 40: 599–608.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2013) An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2016) ‘Let’s touch base!’, in Latour, B. (ed.) Reset Modernity! Cambridge, MA and London: 11–23.Google Scholar
Lee, M. (2011) ‘The distinction between primary and secondary qualities in ancient Greek philosophy’, in Nolan, L. (ed.) Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. Oxford: 15–40.Google Scholar
Lehoux, D. (2012) What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Lehoux, D. (2013) ‘Seeing and unseeing, seen and unseen’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 131–51.Google Scholar
Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) (2013) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford.Google Scholar
Leonard, W. E. and Smith, S. B. (eds.) (1942) De Rerum Natura: The Latin Text of Lucretius. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Leone, G. (2002a) ‘Epicuro, Della natura, libro XXXIV (PHerc. 1431)’, CronErc 32: 7–135.Google Scholar
Leone, G. (2002b) ‘Nuove conferme dall’opera Della natura di Epicuro alla valenza tecnica del gruppo semantico ἕτοιμος/ἑτοίμως nella dottrina epicurea dei pori’, SIFC 20: 104–18.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1950) ‘Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss’, in Mauss, M., Sociologie et anthropologie. Paris: IX–LII.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1972) ‘Religion, langue et histoire: à propos d’un texte inédit de Ferdinand de Saussure’, in Mélanges en l’honneur de Fernand Braudel 2. Toulouse: 325–33.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. M. (1992) ‘The popularity of the Phaenomena of Aratus’, in Deroux, C. (ed.) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 6. Brussels.Google Scholar
Lezra, J. (2016) ‘On the nature of Marx’s things’, in Lezra, J. and Blake, L. (eds.) Lucretius and Modernity. Epicurean Encounters across Time and Disciplines. New York, NY: 125–43.Google Scholar
Lezra, J. and Blake, L. (eds.) (2016) Lucretius and Modernity. Epicurean Encounters across Time and Disciplines. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (2015) Analogical Investigations: Historical and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human Reasoning. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, J. (1984) Responsive Readings. Versions of Echo in Pastoral, Epic, and Jonsonian Masque. New Haven, CT and London.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1977) ‘Chance and natural law in Epicureanism’, Phronesis 22: 63–88. Repr. in A. A. Long (ed.) (2006) From Epicurus to Epictetus. Oxford: 157–77.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1996) ‘Dialectic and the Stoic sage’, in Stoic Studies. Cambridge and New York, NY: 85–106.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2009) ‘How does Socrates’ divine sign communicate with him?’, in Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R. (eds.) A Companion to Socrates. Chichester: 63–74.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (1995) Review of Schiesaro, A., Mitsis, P. and Clay, J. S. (1993) Mega nepios: il destinatario nell’epos didascalio. BMCRev 95.06.13.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, M. (2014) ‘Hunting’, in Campbell, G. L. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life. Oxford and New York, NY: 203–15.Google Scholar
Maniglier, P. (2014) ‘A metaphysical turn? Bruno Latour’s An Inquiry into Modes of Existence’, Radical Philosophy 187: 37–44.Google Scholar
Marchetta, A. (1989) I versi teologici del De rerum natura di Lucrezio: I 44–49. L’Aquila and Rome.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (ed.) (1934) De rerum natura libri sex (1st edn.; 2nd edn. 1953; 3rd edn. 1957; 4th edn. 1963). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (2005) Latin Poetry and the Judgement of Taste. An Essay in Aesthetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
McCarthy, G. E. (1990) Marx and the Ancients. Classical Ethics, Social Justice and Nineteenth-Century Political Economy. Savage, MD.Google Scholar
McCarthy-Jones, S. (2012) Hearing Voices: The Histories, Causes and Meanings of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McIvor, M. (2008) ‘The young Marx and German idealism: revisiting the doctoral dissertation’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 46: 395–415.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. (ed.) (1989) Ovid, Amores. Vol. II: A Commentary on Book One. Liverpool.Google Scholar
McOsker, M. (2014) ‘A new edition of PHerc. 188 (Demetrius Laco, On Poems I)’, CronErc 44: 19–48.Google Scholar
Mehl, D. (1999) ‘The intricate translation of the Epicurean doctrine of ψυχή in Book 3 of Lucretius’, Philologus 143: 272–87.Google Scholar
Miller, F. (1909) ‘Evidences of incompleteness in the Aeneid of Vergil’, CJ 4: 341–55.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2016) ‘Ovid’s Bacchic helmsman and Homeric Hymn 7’, in Faulkner, A., Schwab, A. and Vergados, A. (eds.) The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 95–108.Google Scholar
Minadeo, R. (1969) The Lyre of Science: Form and Meaning in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
Minyard, J. D. (1985) Lucretius and the Late Republic: An Essay in Roman Intellectual History. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1993) ‘Committing philosophy on the reader: didactic coercion and reader autonomy in De Rerum Natura’, in Schiesaro, A., Mitsis, P. and Clay, J. S. (eds.) Mega nepios: il destinatario nell’epos didascalico. Pisa: 111–28.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1941) Review of Farrington, B. (1939) Science and Politics in the Ancient World. JRS 31: 149–57.Google Scholar
Montag, W. (2016) ‘From clinamen to conatus: Deleuze, Lucretius, Spinoza’, in Lezra, J. and Blake, L. (eds.) Lucretius and Modernity. Epicurean Encounters across Time and Disciplines. New York, NY: 163–72.Google Scholar
Montarese, F. (2012) Lucretius and his Sources: A Study of Lucretius De rerum natura 1.635–920. Berlin.Google Scholar
Morenval, A. (2017) Le Tout et l’Infini dans le De rerum natura de Lucrèce. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2013) ‘Nil igitur mors est ad nos? Iphianassa, the Athenian Plague, and Epicurean Views of Death’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 211–32.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2012) ‘The sublime, today?’, in Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H. (eds.) Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism. New York, NY and Oxford: 239–66.Google Scholar
Müller, G. (1978) ‘Die Finalia der sechs Bücher des Lucrez’, in Gigon, O. (ed.) Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur L’Antiquité Classique 24. Geneva: 197–221. Trans. Reitz, B. in Gale, M. R. (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 234–54: ‘The conclusions of the six books of Lucretius’.Google Scholar
Munro, H. A. J. (ed.) (1886) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. 2 vols. (4th edn.; 1st edn. 1864). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mussehl, J. (1912) De Lucretiani Libri Primi Condicione ac Retractatione. Diss. Greifswald.Google Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. (2014) ‘Ennius and the revaluation of traditional historiography in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura’, in Ker, J. and Pieper, C. (eds.) Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World. Leiden and Boston, MA: 435–61.Google Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. (2016) ‘Hercules and Apollo in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Faulkner, A., Schwab, A. and Vergados, A. (eds.) The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 127–41.Google Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. (2018) ‘The Alexandrian footnote in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura’, Mnemosyne 71: 75–99.Google Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. (2019) ‘Provisional argumentation and Lucretius’ honeyed cup’, CQ 68.2: 523–33.Google Scholar
Newman, J. H. (1875) A Letter Addressed to His Grace the Duke of Norfolk on Occasion of Mr. Gladstone's Recent Expostulation. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. (1976) Epicurean Political Philosophy: The De Rerum Natura of Lucretius. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Niehues-Pröbsting, H. (2015) ‘Mythos des Protagoras, Thales-Anekdote, Höhlengleichnis. Blumenbergs Platonlektüre, kritisch betrachtet’, in Möller, M. (ed.) Prometheus gibt nicht auf: Antike Welt und modernes Leben in Hans Blumenbergs Philosophie. Paderborn: 25–46.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (1995) Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (2004) Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in its Cultural Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M and Hubbard, M. (eds.) (1978) A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book II. Oxford.Google Scholar
Noller, E. M. (2015) ‘Re et sonitu distare. Überlegungen zu Ordnung und Bedeutung in Lukrez, De Rerum Natura I, 814–829’, in Haß, C. D. and Noller, E. M. (eds.) Was bedeutet Ordnung–was ordnet Bedeutung? Berlin: 137–72.Google Scholar
Norbrook, D. (2015) ‘Introduction’, in Norbrook, D., Harrison, S. J. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) Lucretius and the Early Modern. Oxford: 1–27.Google Scholar
Norbrook, D., Harrison, S. J. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) (2015) Lucretius and the Early Modern. Oxford.Google Scholar
Norman, D. A. (1991) ‘Cognitive artifacts’, in Carroll, J. M. (ed.) Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human–Computer Interface. Cambridge and New York, NY: 17–38.Google Scholar
Nugent, S. G. (1994) ‘Mater matters: the female in Lucretius’ De rerum natura’, ColbyQ 30: 179–205.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1986) ‘Therapeutic arguments: Epicurus and Aristotle’, in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) The Norms of Nature. Cambridge: 31–74.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.) (1992) Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (ed.) (1995a) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1995b) ‘How to read poetry about gods’, in Obbink, D. (ed.) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford and New York, NY: 189–209.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (2002) ‘“All gods are true” in Epicurus’, in Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.) Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath. Leiden: 183–221.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1998) ‘Venus or the Muse as “Ally” (Lucr. 1.24, Simon. frag. Eleg. 11.20-22 W)’, CPh 93.1: 69–74.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (2007) Inconsistency in Roman Epic. Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, T. (1997) ‘The ontological status of sensible qualities for Democritus and Epicurus’, AncPhil 17: 119–134.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, T. (2003) ‘Lucretius on the cycle of life and the fear of death’, Apeiron 36: 43–65.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2019) ‘Knowledge is power: dynamics of (dis)empowerment in didactic poetry’, in Canevaro, L. G. and O’Rourke, D. (eds.) Didactic Poetry of Greece, Rome and Beyond: Knowledge, Power, Tradition. Swansea: 21–52.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. and Pelttari, A. (forthcoming) ‘Intertextuality’, in Gibson, R. K. and Whitton, C. L. (eds.) The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pace, N. (2000) ‘La rivoluzione umanistica della scuola epicurea: Demetrio Lacone e Filodemo, teorici di poesia’, CronErc 30: 71–9.Google Scholar
Pasoli, E. (1970) ‘Ideologia nella poesia: lo stile di Lucrezio’, L&S 5: 367–86. Repr. in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 309–28.Google Scholar
Passannante, G. (2011) The Lucretian Renaissance: Philology and the Afterlife of Tradition. Chicago, IL and London.Google Scholar
Pavan, M. (1989) ‘Imperium sine fine dedi (Verg. Aen. 1, 279)’, in Ceresa-Gastaldo, A. (ed.) L’infinito dei greci e dei romani. Genoa: 107–20.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2012) The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigraphica in Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Perin, C. (2010) ‘Scepticism and belief’, in Bett, R. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge and New York, NY: 145–64.Google Scholar
Piazzi, L. (ed., trans.) (2005) Lucrezio e i Presocratici: un commento a De rerum natura 1, 635–920. Pisa.Google Scholar
Pizzani, U. (1959) Il problema del testo e della composizione del De rerum natura di Lucrezio. Rome.Google Scholar
Pope, M. (2017) ‘Sweating with blood and civil conflict in De rerum natura’, CJ 112.1: 41–55.Google Scholar
Pope, M. (2018) ‘Seminal verse: atomic orality and aurality in De Rerum Natura’, EuGeStA 8: 108–30.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2003) ‘Lucretius and the poetics of void’, in Monet, A. (ed.) Le jardin romain: Épicurisme et poésie à Rome, Mélanges offerts à Mayotte Bollack. Lille: 197–226.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2007) ‘Lucretius and the Sublime’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 167–84.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (forthcoming) ‘Epicurus in nineteenth-century Germany: Hegel, Marx, and Nietzsche’, in Mitsis, P. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Epicureanism. New York, NY and Oxford.Google Scholar
Priestman, M. (2007) ‘Lucretius in Romantic and Victorian Britain’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 289–305.Google Scholar
Prosperi, V. (2007) ‘Lucretius in the Italian Renaissance’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 214–26.Google Scholar
Pugh, T., Shank, M. H., Treharne, E., Curry Woods, M., Parker, J., Sedley, D. L., Morrissey, L., Stockton, W., Rundle, D., de Grazia, M., Holsinger, B., Conklin Aakbari, S., Evans, R., Freccero, C., Mallette, K., English, J. F. and Cohen, J. J. (2013) ‘Book review forum: The Swerve: How the World Became Modern by Stephen Greenblatt’, Exemplaria 25.4: 313–70.Google Scholar
Purinton, J. (1999) ‘Epicurus on “free volition” and the atomic swerve’, Phronesis 44: 253–99.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. (2007) ‘Lucretius in the Middle Ages and early Renaissance: transmission and scholarship’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 205–13.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2002) ‘The speech of nature in Lucretius’ De rerum natura 3.931–71’, CQ 52: 291–304.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2004) ‘Readers in the underworld: Lucretius, De Rerum Natura 3.912–1075’, JRS 94: 27–46.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. (ed.) (2011) Implied Author: Back from the Grave or Dead Again? = Style 45.1.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. (1975) ‘Homeric professors in the age of the Sophists’, PCPhS 201: 65–81.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. (2015) The Closure of Space in Roman Poetics: Empire’s Inward Turn. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.) (2009a) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (2009b) ‘A short primer on situated cognition’, in Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: 3–10.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.) (1997) Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1984) ‘The historiography of philosophy: four genres’, in Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B. and Skinner, Q. (eds.) Philosophy in History: Essays in the Historiography of Philosophy. Cambridge: 49–75.Google Scholar
Roscher, W. H. (1886–90) Ausführliches Lexikon der griechischen und römischen Mythologie. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rosen, Z. (1977) Bruno Bauer and Karl Marx. The Influence of Bruno Bauer on Marx’s Thought. The Hague.Google Scholar
Rouse, W. H. D. and Smith, M. F. (eds., trans.) (1992) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura (3rd edn.; 1st edn. 1975). Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Saint-Denis, E. de (1963) ‘Lucrèce, poète de l’infini’, L’information littéraire 15: 17–24.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1972) Cours de linguistique générale (3rd edn.) Paris. [1st edn.: Lausanne, 1916.]Google Scholar
Schafer, P. M. (2003) ‘The young Marx on Epicurus: dialectical atomism and human freedom’, in Gordon, D. R. and Suits, D. B. (eds.) Epicurus: His Continuing Influence and Contemporary Relevance. Rochester, NY: 127–37.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (1990) Simulacrum et imago: Gli argomenti analogici nel De rerum natura. Pisa.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2007a) ‘Lucretius and Roman politics and history’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 41–58.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2007b) ‘Didaxis, rhetoric, and the law in Lucretius’, in Heyworth, S. (ed.) Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Oxford: 63–90.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2014) ‘Materiam superabat opus: Lucretius metamorphosed’, JRS 104: 73–104.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A., Mitsis, P. and Clay, J. S. (eds.) (1993) Mega nepios: il destinatario nell’epos didascalico. Pisa.Google Scholar
Schmid, Wolfgang (1938) ‘Altes und neues zu einer Lukrezfrage’, Philologus 93: 338–51. Repr. in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 41–54.Google Scholar
Schmid, Wolf (2009) ‘Implied Author’, in Hühn, P., Pier, J., Schmid, W. and Schönert, J. (eds.) Handbook of Narratology. Berlin: 161–73.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. (1978–9) ‘Cicero’s place in Roman philosophy: a study of his prefaces’, CJ 74: 115–27.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2008) ‘Ciceronian dialogue’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.) The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: 63–84.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (1970) Horror ac divina voluptas. Études sur la poétique et la poésie de Lucrèce. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (1978) ‘Le regard sur l’invisible: étude sur l’emploi de l’analogie dans l’oeuvre de Lucrèce’, in Gigon, O. (ed.) Lucrèce: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur L’Antiquité Classique 24. Geneva: 77–114. Trans. M. R. Gale in M. R. Gale (ed.) (2007) Lucretius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: 255–88: ‘Seeing the invisible: a study of Lucretius’ use of analogy in De rerum natura’.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (1983) ‘Sur quelques aspects de la critique des mythes chez Lucrèce’, in Gigante, M. (ed.) ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ: studi sull’epicureismo greco e latino offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples: 353–71. Repr. in P. H. Schrijvers (1999) Lucrèce et les sciences de la vie. Leiden: 21–39.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (1996) ‘Lucretius and the origin and development of political life (De rerum natura 5.1105–60)’, in Algra, K., van der Horst, P. W. and Runia, D. T. (eds.) Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy, Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on His Sixtieth Birthday. Leiden: 220–30.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (ed., trans.) (2008) Lucretius, De Natuur van de Dingen: De Rerum Natura. Groningen.Google Scholar
Schur, D. (2014) Plato’s Wayward Path: Literary Form and the Republic. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Scott, W. (1883) ‘The physical constitution of the Epicurean gods’, Journal of Philology 12: 212–47.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1983) ‘Epicurus’ refutation of determinism’, in Gigante, M. (ed.) ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ: studi sull’epicureismo greco e latino offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples: 11–51.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1989b) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman world’, in Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J. (eds.) Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford: 96–119.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2007) Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2009) ‘Epicureanism in the Roman Republic’, in Warren, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: 29–45.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2011) ‘Epicurus’ theological innatism’, in Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R. (eds.) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge and New York, NY: 29–52.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1989) ‘Poetic immortality and the fear of death: the second proem of the De Rerum Natura’, HSPh 92: 193–212.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1990) Lucretius on Death and Anxiety: Poetry and Philosophy in De Rerum Natura. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Segura Ramos, B. (1982) ‘El proemio del De rerum natura de Lucrecio’, Habis 13: 43–50.Google Scholar
Serres, M. (2000) The Birth of Physics in the Text of Lucretius. Trans. Hawkes, J.. Manchester.Google Scholar
Shackleton-Bailey, D. R. (ed.) (1980) Cicero: Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et M. Brutum. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. R. (2008) ‘The philosopher and the mother cow: towards a gendered reading of Lucretius, De Rerum Natura’, in Zajko, V. and Leonard, M. (eds.) Laughing with Medusa: Classical Myth and Psychoanalysis. Oxford: 254–74.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. R. (2013) ‘Introduction’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds.) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: 1–24.Google Scholar
Shearin, W. H. (2012) ‘Haunting Nepos’, in Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H. (eds.) Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism. Oxford: 30–51.Google Scholar
Shearin, W. H. (2015) The Language of Atoms: Performativity and Politics in Lucretius’ De rerum natura. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (1995) ‘The Epicurean philosopher as Hellenistic poet’, in Obbink, D. (ed.) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford and New York, NY: 41–57.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (ed., trans.) (1997) The Epigrams of Philodemus: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. (ed., trans.) (1993) Diogenes of Oenoanda: The Epicurean Inscription. Naples.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1953) ‘Epicurus on the growth and decline of the cosmos’, AJPh 74.1: 34–51.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1983) Time, Creation and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. London.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1988) Matter, Space and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and their Sequel. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2014) Moral Conscience Through the Ages: Fifth Century bce to the Present. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. (1995) ‘The Marxism of Marx’s doctoral dissertation’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 33: 133–58.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J. (1979) Words Upon Words: The Anagrams of Ferdinand de Saussure. Trans. Emmet, O.. New Haven, CT. [Originally published as Les mots sous les mots: Les anagrammes de Ferdinand de Saussure (Paris 1971).]Google Scholar
Sumner, G. V. (1973) The Orators in Cicero’s Brutus. Prosopography and Chronology. Toronto.Google Scholar
Super, R. W. (ed.) (1960–77) The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (1998) Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectivism. Cambridge and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2000) ‘Body, mind, and order: local memory and the control of mental representations in medieval and Renaissance sciences of self’, in Freeland, G. and Corones, A. (eds.) 1543 and All That: Image and Word, Change and Continuity in the Proto-Scientific Revolution. Dordrecht: 117–50.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2008) ‘Distributed cognition: domains and dimensions’, in Dror, I. E. and Harnad, S. (eds.) Cognition Distributed: How Cognitive Technology Extends Our Minds. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: 45–56.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2010) ‘Exograms and interdisciplinarity: history, the extended mind, and the civilizing process’, in Menary, R. (ed.) The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA and London: 189–225.Google Scholar
Syed, Y. (2004) ‘Ovid’s use of the hymnic genre in the Metamorphoses’, in Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J. and Stephens, S. A. (eds.) Rituals in Ink: A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome. Wiesbaden: 99–113.Google Scholar
Sykes Davies, H. (1931–2) ‘Notes on Lucretius’, The Criterion 11: 25–42. Repr. in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 273–90.Google Scholar
Taminiaux, J. (1998) The Thracian Maid and the Professional Thinker: Arendt and Heidegger. Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. (2016) Texts, Editors, and Readers: Methods and Problems in Latin Textual Criticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Taub, L. C. (2012) ‘Physiological analogies and metaphors in explanations of the earth and the cosmos’, in Horstmanshoff, M., King, H. and Zittel, C. (eds.) Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe. Leiden: 41–63.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (ed., trans.) (1999) The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus. Fragments: A Text and Translation with a Commentary. Toronto.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1960) The Voting Districts of the Roman Republic. American Academy in Rome Papers and Monographs 20. Rome.Google Scholar
Thom, J. (ed., trans.) (2006) Cleanthes’ Hymn to Zeus. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 33. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Thomas, O. (2011) ‘The Homeric Hymn to Pan’, in Faulkner, A. (ed.) The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: 151–72.Google Scholar
Thury, E. M. (1987) ‘Lucretius’ Poem as a simulacrum of the rerum natura’, AJPh 108: 270–94.Google Scholar
Tissol, G. (1997) The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2007) ‘The didactic plot of Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, and its Empedoclean model’, BICS Supplement 94: 243–82.Google Scholar
Tribble, E. (2005) ‘Distributing cognition in the globe’, Shakespeare Quarterly 56: 135–55.Google Scholar
Tribble, E. (2011) Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Tutrone, F. (2012a) Filosofi e animali in Roma antica: Modelli di animalità e umanità in Lucrezio e Seneca. Pisa.Google Scholar
Tutrone, F. (2012b) ‘Between atoms and humours: Lucretius’ didactic poetry as a model of integrated and bifocal physiology’, in Horstmanshoff, M., King, H. and Zittel, C. (eds.) Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe. Leiden: 83–102.Google Scholar
Vahlen, J. (1877) ‘Über das Prooemium des Lucretius’, Monatsberichte der Berliner Akademie 1877: 479–99.Google Scholar
Valachova, C. (2018) The Political and Philosophical Strategies of Roman Epicureans in the Late Republic. Diss. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Van der Valk, J. (ed.) (1903) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Pars prior (Lib. I). Kampen.Google Scholar
Van Gelder, T. (1995) ‘What might cognition be, if not computation?’, Journal of Philosophy 92: 345–81.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P. (1991) ‘A “beautiful death” and the disfigured corpse in Homeric epic’, in Zeitlin, F. I. (ed.) Mortals and Immortals. Princeton, NJ: 51–74.Google Scholar
Vieron, M. P. (2013) Poetic Voice and Readership in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. Diss. Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1971) ‘Introduction: the paradox of Socrates’, in Vlastos, G. (ed.) The Philosophy of Socrates. Garden City, NY: 1–21.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2002) The Poetics of Latin Didactic. Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2010) ‘Lucretius’ prayer for peace and the date of De rerum natura’, CQ 60: 127–31.Google Scholar
Wakefield, G. (ed.) (1796–7) T. Lucretii Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. 4 vols. London.Google Scholar
Warburton Lee, J. H. (ed.) (1884) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri I–III. London.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2007) ‘Lucretius and Greek philosophy’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: 19–32.Google Scholar
West, D. A. (1982) ‘Farewell atomology’, CR 32.1: 25–7 [= review of J. M. Snyder (1980) Puns and Poetry in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura].Google Scholar
West, D. A. (1991) Review of I. Dionigi (1988) Lucrezio: Le parole e le cose. Gnomon 63: 647–9.Google Scholar
White, M. J. (2013) ‘Aristotle on the infinite, space, and time’, in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.) A Companion to Aristotle. Malden, MA and Oxford: 260–76.Google Scholar
Whitlatch, L. (2014) ‘Empiricist dogs and the superiority of philosophy in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura’, CW 108: 45–66.Google Scholar
Wigodsky, M. (2004) ‘Emotions and immortality in Philodemus’ On the Gods 3 and the Aeneid’, in Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin, TX: 211–30.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (2004) Boundaries of the Mind: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences: Cognition. Cambridge and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1974) ‘The two worlds of Titus Lucretius’, in Wiseman, T. P., Cinna the Poet and Other Roman Essays. Leicester: 11–43.Google Scholar
Wormell, D. (1960) ‘Lucretius: the personality of the poet’, G&R 7: 54–65. Repr. in C. J. Classen (ed.) (1986) Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York, NY: 17–28.Google Scholar
Zajko, V. and Leonard, M. (eds.) (2008) Laughing with Medusa: Classical Myth and Psychoanalysis. Oxford.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. and Norman, D. A. (1994) ‘Representations in distributed cognitive tasks’, Cognitive Science 18: 87–122.Google Scholar
Zinn, P. (2018) ‘Lucretius on sound’, in Butler, S. and Nooter, S. (eds.) Sound and the Ancient Senses: The Senses in Antiquity. London and New York, NY: 130–49.Google Scholar