Book contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2024
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Applied ScienceKnowledge, Modernity, and Britain's Public Realm, pp. 266 - 315Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Abbott, George C. 1970. ‘British Colonial Aid Policy during the Nineteen Thirties’. Canadian Journal of History 5, no. 1: 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addison, Christopher. 1939. Four and a Half Years: A Personal Diary from June 1914 to January 1919. Vol. 1. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Adelman, Juliana. 2015. Communities of Science in Nineteenth-Century Ireland. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Advisory Council on Scientific Policy. 1960. Annual Report of the Advisory Council for Scientific Policy 1959–60. Cmnd 1167. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Agar, Jon. 2011. ‘Thatcher, Scientist’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 65, no. 3: 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agar, Jon. 2012. Science in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. London: Polity Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Agar, Jon. 2016. ‘The Defence Research Committee, 1963–1972’. In Leggett, Don and Sleigh, Charlotte (eds.), Scientific Governance in Britain, 1914–79. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 100–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agar, Jon, and Balmer, Brian. 1998. ‘British Scientists and the Cold War: The Defence Research Policy Committee and Information Networks, 1947–1963’. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 28, no. 2: 209–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, G. C. 1948. Economic Thought and Industrial Policy. An Inaugural Lecture Delivered at University College London, on March 4, 1948. London: H K Lewis.Google Scholar
Alter, Peter. 1987. The Reluctant Patron: Science and the State in Britain 1850–1920. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Altick, Richard D. 1978. The Shows of London. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
AMRC. 2017. Charities’ Funding Contributes to UK Medical Research Excellence. Available at www.amrc.org.uk/news/charities-funding-contributes-to-uk-medical-research-excellence (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Anderson, R. G. W. 1992. ‘“What Is Technology?”: Education through Museums in the Mid-Nineteenth Century’. British Journal for the History of Science 25 no. 2: 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Kay. 1975. ‘Politics, Professionalism and the Organisation of Scientists: the Association of Scientific Workers, 1917–1942’. DPhil thesis, Sussex University.Google Scholar
Anduaga, Aitor. 2009. Wireless and Empire: Geopolitics, Radio Industry and Ionosphere in the British Empire, 1918–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anker, Peder. 2001. Imperial Ecology: Environmental Order in the British Empire, 1895–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleton, Edward V. 1945. ‘The Work of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research’. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 93, no. 4694: 372–84.Google Scholar
Appleton, Edward V. 1959. ‘Notes on Science – Pure and Applied’. British Affairs 3, no. 4: 174–77.Google Scholar
Arapostathis, Stathis. 2012. ‘Electrical Innovations, Authority and Consulting Expertise in Late Victorian Britain’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 67, no. 1: 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arapostathis, Stathis, and Gooday, Graeme. 2013. ‘Electrical Technoscience and Physics in Transition, 1880–1920’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44, no. 2: 202–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, Gail. 2006. ‘How the “S” came to be in UNESCO’. In Petitjean, P., Zharov, V., Glaser, G., Richardson, J., de Padirac, B., and Archibald, G. (eds.), Sixty Years of Science at UNESCO, 1945–2005. Paris: UNESCO, 36–40.Google Scholar
Argles, Michael. 1959. ‘The Royal Commission on Technical Instruction, 1881–4: Its Inception and Composition’. The Vocational Aspect of Education 11, no. 23: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armytage, W. H. G. 1950. ‘J. F. D. Donnelly: Pioneer in Vocational Education’. The Vocational Aspect of Secondary and Further Education 2, no. 4: 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armytage, W. H. G. 1953. Civic Universities: Aspects of a British Tradition. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
Armytage, W. H. G. 1965. The Rise of the Technocrats: A Social History. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Arnold, Lorna. 1992. Windscale 1957: Anatomy of a Nuclear Accident. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Matthew. 1868a. ‘Report by Mr. Matthew Arnold’. Schools Inquiry Commission. [3966-V]. London: HMSO, Vol. 6, 441–726.Google Scholar
Aronova, Elena. 2012. ‘The Congress for Cultural Freedom, Minerva, and the Quest for Instituting “Science Studies” in the Age of Cold War’. Minerva 50, no. 3: 307–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, Eric. 1958. Technology and the Academics: An Essay on Universities and the Scientific Revolution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ashby, Eric, and Anderson, Mary. 1974. Portrait of Haldane at Work on Education. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, Percy. 1904. Modern Tariff History. Germany – United States – France. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Ashworth, William J. 2017. The Industrial Revolution: The State, Knowledge and Global Trade. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Association of Scientific Workers. 1944. Science in the Universities, Report of the Association of Scientific Workers to the University Grants Committee. Oxford: Oxonian Press.Google Scholar
Atkins, Peter J. 2005. ‘The Empire Marketing Board’. In Oddy, D. J. and Petráňová, L. (eds.), The Diffusion of Food Culture in Europe from the Late Eighteenth Century to the Present. Prague: Academic Press, 248–55.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Paul, and Sheard, Sally (eds.). 2018. Origins of the National Institute for Health Research: Transcript of a Witness Seminar Held at the University of Liverpool in London on 28 February 2018. Liverpool: Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Paul, Sheard, Sally, and Walley, Tom. 2019. ‘All the Stars Were Aligned’? The Origins of England’s National Institute for Health Research’. Health Research Policy and Systems 17, no. 95: doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0491-5 (accessed March 2023)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
‘Atomic Research in Britain: First Pictures Harwell Atomic Research Establishment’. 1948. Illustrated London News, 31 July: 132.Google Scholar
Austoker, Joan. 1989. ‘Walter Morley Fletcher and the Origins of a Basic Biomedical Research Policy’. In Austoker, Joan and Bryder, Linda (eds.), Historical Perspectives on the Role of the MRC. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–33.Google Scholar
Aylen, Jonathan. 2015. ‘First Waltz: Development and Deployment of Blue Danube, Britain’s Post-War Atomic Bomb’. The International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology 85, no. 1: 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babbage, Charles. 1832. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. London: Charles Knight.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, Reginald Hugh Spencer. 1929. The Life of Lord Fisher of Kilverstone: Admiral of the Fleet. 2 vols. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Maas, Harro. 2016. ‘Marginalizing Maclaurin: The Attempt to Develop an Economics of Technological Progress at MIT, 1940–50’. History of Political Economy 48, no. 3: 423–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Maas, Harro. 2017. ‘A Road Not Taken: Economists, Historians of Science, and the Making of the Bowman Report’. Isis 108, no. 1: 82–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, Robert S. 2001. ‘Science and Modernity in Aldous Huxley’s Interwar Essays and Novels’. In Barfoot, C. C. (ed.), Aldous Huxley between East and West. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balconi, Margherita, Brusoni, Stefano, and Orsenigo, Luigi. 2010. ‘In Defence of the Linear Model: An Essay’. Research Policy 39, no. 1: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfour, Graham. 1903. The Educational Systems of Great Britain and Ireland. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Balls, W. Lawrence. 1926. ‘The Classification of Research Work’. Nature 118, no. 2965: 298–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balmer, Brian. 2015. ‘An Open Day for Secrets: Biological Warfare, Steganography, and Hiding Things in Plain Sight’. In Rappert, Brian and Balmer, Brian (eds.), Absence in Science, Security and Policy: From Research Agendas to Global Strategy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 34–52.Google Scholar
Barker, Ernest. 1932. ‘Universities in Great Britain’. In Kotschnig, Walter M. and Prys, (eds.), The University in a Changing World: A Symposium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 85–120.Google Scholar
Barnes, Sarah V. 1996. ‘England’s Civic Universities and the Triumph of the Oxbridge Ideal’. History of Education Quarterly 36, no. 3: 271–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Ruth. 1998. ‘Just before Nature: The Purposes of Science and the Purposes of Popularization in Some English Popular Science Journals of the 1860s’. Annals of Science 55, no. 1: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, Ruth. 2018. The X Club: Power and Authority in Victorian Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, M., Durant, J., Ragnarsdottir, A., and Rudolfsdottir, A.. 1995. ‘Science and Technology in the British Press, 1946–90’. 3 vols. Report on Wellcome Trust Grant no 037859/Z/93/Z.Google Scholar
Bauer, M., Petkova, Kristina, Boyadjieva, Pepka, and Gornev, Galin. 2006. ‘Long-Term Trends in the Public Representation of Science across the “Iron Curtain”: 1946–1995’. Social Studies of Science 36, no. 1: 99–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, Charles A. 1928. ‘Introduction’. In Beard, Charles A. (ed.), Whither Mankind: A Panorama of Modern Civilization. New York: Longmans Green, 1–24.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. 1996. ‘“Wireless”: Popular Physics, Radio and Modernism’. In Spufford, Francis and Uglow, Jenny (eds.), Cultural Babbage: Technology, Time and Invention. London: Faber & Faber, 149–66.Google Scholar
Beinart, William, Brown, Karen, and Gilfoyle, Daniel. 2009. ‘Experts and Expertise in Colonial Africa Reconsidered: Science and the Interpenetration of Knowledge’. African Affairs 108, no. 432: 413–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belanger, Dian Olson. 1998. Enabling American Innovation: Engineering and the National Science Foundation. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, John. 2017. Life Sciences Industrial Strategy: A Report to the Government from the Life Sciences Sector. Available at www.gov.uk/government/publications/life-sciences-industrial-strategy (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Belloc, Hilaire. 1926. A Companion to Mr. Wells’s ‘Outline of History’. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Benn, Anthony Wedgwood. 1969. ‘Government and Technology’. Journal of the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce 117, no. 5151: 155–72.Google Scholar
Bennett, B. M., and Hodge, J. M. (eds.). 2011. Science and Empire: Knowledge and Networks of Science across the British Empire, 1800–1970. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette. 2009. ‘A Historical Perspective on Science and Its “Others”’. Isis 100, no. 2: 359–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette. 2020. ‘At the Boundary between Science and Industrial Practices: Applied Science, Arts, and Technique in France’. Science Museum Group Journal 13 (Spring). https://journal.sciencemuseum.ac.uk/article/arts-and-technique-in-france/#abstract.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Carin, and Lightman, Bernard (eds.). 2017. Science Museums in Transition: Cultures of Display in Nineteenth-Century Britain and America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, Adrian. 2004. Gender, Modernity, and the Popular Press in Inter-War Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. H. 1949. ‘The Transmission of New Ideas: The Shirley Institute and the Cotton Industry’. Journal of the Textile Institute Proceedings 40, no. 7: 733–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackett, Patrick. 1968. ‘Memorandum to the Select Committee on Science and Technology’. Nature 219, no. 5159: 1107–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, Lucy, and Hall, Lesley. 2010. ‘Eugenics in Britain: The View from the Metropole’. In Bashford, Alison and Levine, Philipa (eds.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213–27.Google Scholar
Blatchford, Ian. 2021. ‘Lyon Playfair: Chemist and Commissioner, 1818–1858’. Science Museum Group Journal 15 (Spring): doi.org/10.15180/211504.Google Scholar
Bloor, David. 2011. The Enigma of the Aerofoil: Rival Theories in Aerodynamics, 1909–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Board of Education. 1905. Preliminary Report of the Departmental Committee on the Royal College of Science and Royal School of Mines. Cd 2610. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Board of Education. 1906. Final Report of the Departmental Committee on the Royal College of Science, etc. Cmd 2872. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Board of Education. 1915. Scheme for the Organisation and Development of Scientific and Industrial Research. Cd 8005. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Board of Trade. 1929. Final Report of the Committee on Industry and Trade. Cmd 3282. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Board of Trade. 1931. Minutes of Evidence Taken before the Departmental Committee on the Patents and Designs Acts and Practice of the Patents Office. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Boden, Rebecca, Cox, Deborah, and Nedeva, Maria. 2006. ‘The Appliance of Science? New Public Management and Strategic Change’. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, no. 2: 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, Rebecca, Cox, Deborah, Nedeva, Maria, and Barker, Kate. 2004. Scrutinising Science: The Changing UK Government of Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, Rebecca, Gummett, Philip, Cox, Deborah, and Barker, K. E.. 1998. ‘Men in White Coats … Men in Grey Suits: New Public Management and the Funding of Science and Technology Services to the UK Government’. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 11, no. 3: 267–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, Rachel. 2020. ‘The Post Office Research Station at Dollis Hill, 1933–1965’. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Bowden, Vivian (Lord). 1965. ‘Expectations for Science’. New Scientist 27, no. 463 (30 September): 849–53; and 28, no. 464 (7 October): 48–52.Google Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Star, Susan Leigh. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J. 2009. Science for All: The Popularization of Science in Early Twentieth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Peter J. 2010. Reconciling Science and Religion: The Debate in Early-Twentieth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J., and Whyte, Nicholas (eds.). 1997. Science and Society in Ireland. The Social Context of Science and Technology in Ireland 1800–1950. Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies, Queens University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Boyle, Alison. 2020. ‘Stories and Silences in Modern Physics Collections: An Object Biography Approach’. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Boyns, Trevor. 1987. ‘Rationalisation in the Inter-War Period: The Case of the South Wales Steam Coal Industry’. Business History 29, no. 3: 282–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Margaret, 2012. Charles Dupin (1784–1873) and His Influence on France: The Contributions of a Mathematician, Educator, Engineer, and Statesman. London: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
Brady, Robert A. 1932. ‘The Meaning of Rationalization: An Analysis of the Literature’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 46, no. 3: 526–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bragg, W. H. 1928. ‘Craftsmanship and Science’. Supplement to Nature 122, no. 3071: 353–63.Google Scholar
Brake, Laurel. 1997. ‘Writing, Cultural Production, and the Periodical Press in the Nineteenth Century’. In Bullen, J. B. (ed.), Writing and Victorianism. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman, 57–72.Google Scholar
Brech, Edward, Thomson, Andrew, and Wilson, John F.. 2010. Lyndall Urwick, Management Pioneer: A Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bret, Patrice. 2002. L’état, l’armée, la science: l’invention de la recherche publique en France, 1763–1830. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Brewster, David. 1837. ‘Whewell’s History of the Inductive Sciences’. Edinburgh Review 66: 110–51.Google Scholar
Briggs, Asa. 1957. Where We Came In: The Industrial Revolution Reconsidered [A prospectus for Six Broadcast Talks. With Illustrations]. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
Briggs, Asa. 1995. The History of Broadcasting in the United Kingdom, vol. 2: The Golden Age of Wireless. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The British Air-Office: A Place of Wind-Towers, Whirling-Tables, and Gales Made to Order’. 1910. The Illustrated London News (2 April): 497.Google Scholar
British Association for the Advancement of Science. 1945. ‘The Place of Science in Industry’. Transactions of a Conference Held by the Division for the Social and International Relations of Science, January 12–13, 1945. The Advancement of Science 3: 106–56.Google Scholar
British Empire Exhibition. 1924. Pavilion of H. M. Government British Empire Exhibition, 1924. London.Google Scholar
Brock, William H. 2002. Justus von Liebig: The Chemical Gatekeeper. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brock, William H. 2008. W. H. William Crookes 1832–1919 and the Commercialization of Science. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Broks, Peter. 1996. Media Science before the Great War. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Harvey (chair). 1971. Science, Growth and Society: A New Perspective. Report of the Secretary General’s ad hoc Group on New Concepts of Science Policy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Brown, Andrew. 2006. J. D. Bernal: The Sage of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, David. 2010. ‘Morally Transforming the World or Spinning a Line? Politicians and the Newspaper Press in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Britain’. Historical Research 83, no. 220: 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlie, David. 1927. ‘Low-Temperature Carbonization: The Situation in Great Britain’. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 19, no. 1: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Alexandrina. 2013. Robert Willis (1800–1875) and the Foundation of Architectural History. Martlesham: Boydell & Brewer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, R. A. 1966. ‘From Trade School to University: A Microcosm of Social Change’. In Walters, Gerald (ed.), A Technological University: An Experiment in Bath. Bristol: Bath University Press, 12–26.Google Scholar
Buchwald, Jed Z., and Hong, Sungook. 2003. ‘Physics’. In Cahan, David (ed.), From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 163–95.Google Scholar
Buckingham, John. 1952. ‘The Scientific Research Department in the Time of the First Director, 1920–29’. Journal of the Royal Naval Scientific Service 7: 100–103.Google Scholar
Bud, Robert. 1980. ‘The Discipline of Chemistry: The Origin and Early Years of the Chemical Society of London’. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bud, Robert. 1993. The Uses of Life: A History of Biotechnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bud, Robert. 1998. ‘Penicillin and the New Elizabethans’. British Journal for the History of Science 31, no. 3: 305–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bud, Robert. 2008. ‘Upheaval in the Moral Economy of Science? Patenting, Teamwork and the World War II Experience of Penicillin’. History and Technology 24, no. 2: 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bud, Robert. 2010. ‘From Applied Microbiology to Biotechnology: Science, Medicine and Industrial Renewal’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 64, Suppl. 1 (July): S17–S29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bud, Robert. 2013a. ‘Biological Warfare Warriors, Secrecy and Pure Science in the Cold War: How to Understand Dialogue and the Classifications of Science’. Medicina Nei Secoli 26, no. 2: 451–68.Google Scholar
Bud, Robert. 2013b. ‘Framed in the Public Sphere: Tools for the Conceptual History of “Applied Science”: A Review Paper’. History of Science 51, no. 4: 413–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bud, Robert. 2013c. ‘Infected by the Bacillus of Science’. In Morris, Peter (ed.), Science for the Nation: Perspectives on the History of the Science Museum. London: Palgrave, 11–40.Google Scholar
Bud, Robert. 2014a. ‘“Applied Science” in Nineteenth-Century Britain: Public Discourse and the Creation of Meaning, 1817–1876’. History and Technology 30, nos. 1–2: 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bud, Robert. 2014b. ‘Responding to Stories: The 1876 Loan Collection of Scientific Apparatus and the Science Museum.’ Science Museum Group Journal (Spring): doi.org/10.15180/140104.Google Scholar
Bud, Robert. 2016. ‘Science, Brands and the Museum’. Journal of Science Communication 15, no. 6. https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/JCOM_1506_2016_C03.pdf (accessed March 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bud, Robert. 2017. ‘“The Spark Gap Is Mightier Than the Pen”: The Promotion of an Ideology of Science in the Early 1930s’. Journal of Political Ideologies 22, no. 2: 169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bud, Robert. 2018a. ‘Categorizing Science in Nineteenth and Early Twentieth-Century Britain’. In Kaldewey, David and Schauz, Désirée (eds.), Basic and Applied Research: The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. New York: Berghahn Books, 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bud, Robert. 2018b. ‘Kantianism, Cameralism and Applied Science’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 72, no. 3: 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bud, Robert. 2020. ‘Science and the Press’. In Conboy, Martin and Bingham, Adrian (eds.), The Edinburgh History of the British and Irish Press, vol. 3: Competition and Disruption, 1900–2017. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 612–25.Google Scholar
Bud, Robert, Greenhalgh, Paul, James, Frank, and Shiach, Morag (eds.). 2018. Being Modern: The Cultural Impact of Science in the Early Twentieth Century. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Bud, Robert, and Gummett, Philip (eds.). 1999. Cold War Hot Science: Applied Research in Britain’s Defence Laboratories 1945–1990. Reading: Harwood.Google Scholar
Bud, Robert, and Roberts, Gerrylynn K.. 1984. Science versus Practice: Chemistry in Victorian Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bunce, John Thackray. 1970. Josiah Mason: A Biography with Sketches of the History of the Steel-Pen and Electro-Plating Trades. 2nd ed. London: W. & R. Chambers [1890].Google Scholar
Burgess, Tyrrell. 1970. Policy and Practice: The Colleges of Advanced Technology. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1960. A Grammar of Motives. First published 1945. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bush, Vannevar. 2020. Science – The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. First issued 1945. Reprinted in celebration of the National Science Foundation’s 70th anniversary. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. www.nsf.gov/about/history/EndlessFrontier_w.pdf.Google Scholar
Butler, Stuart, and Bud, Robert. 2018. ‘United Kingdom, Short Country Report’. History of Nuclear Energy and Society. www.honest2020.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables_24/UK.pdf.Google Scholar
Butterworth, H. 1968. ‘The Science and Art Department 1853–1900’. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Byatt, I. C. R., and Cohen, A. V.. 1969. An Attempt to Quantify the Economic Benefits of Scientific Research. Department of Education and Science, Science Policy Studies no. 4. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Cahan, David. 2004. An Institute for an Empire: The Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, 1871–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Colin, and Wilson, Graham K.. 1995. The End of Whitehall: Death of a Paradigm? Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Campbell, John. 2020. Haldane: The Forgotten Statesman Who Shaped Modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannadine, David. 1984. ‘The Present and the Past in the English Industrial Revolution 1880–1980’. Past & Present 103, no. 1: 131–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, G. N. 1996. ‘The Scientist as Hero: Public Images of Michael Faraday’. In Shortland, Michael and Yeo, Richard (eds.), Telling Lives in Science: Essays on Scientific Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171–93.Google Scholar
Cantor, G. N. 2011. Religion and the Great Exhibition of 1851. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, Leonard Martin, and Matthews, Geoffrey Frank. 1977. Loughborough from College to University: A History of Higher Education at Loughborough, 1906–1966. Loughborough: Loughborough University of Technology.Google Scholar
Cardwell, D. S. L. 1972. The Organisation of Science in England. First published 1957. London: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar
Cardwell, D. S. L. (ed.). 1974. Artisan to Graduate: Essays to Commemorate the Foundation in 1824 of the Manchester Mechanics’ Institution, Now in 1974 the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Bernard. 1997. ‘Innovation and the Modern Corporation from Heroic Invention to Industrial Science’. In Krige, John and Pestre, Dominique (eds.), Companion to the History of Twentieth-Century Science. Reading: Harwood, 203–26.Google Scholar
Carson, Cathryn. 2010. Heisenberg in the Atomic Age: Science and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, C. F., and Williams, B. R.. 1957. Industry and Technical Progress: Factors Governing the Speed of Application of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, C. F., and Williams, B. R.. 1958. Investment in Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, C. F., and Williams, B. R.. 1959. Science in Industry: Policy for Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, G. B. 2000. Chemical and Biological Defence at Porton Down, 1916–2000. 2nd ed. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Carty, John J. 1916. ‘The Relation of Pure Science to Industrial Research’. Science 44, no. 1137: 511–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catlin, George Edward Gordon. 1972. For God’s Sake, Go!: An Autobiography. Gerrards Cross: Smythe.Google Scholar
Catterall, Peter (ed.). 2011. The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950–57. London: Pan.Google Scholar
‘The Centenary Journal’. 1966. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society 70, no. 661: 90–97.Google Scholar
Central Advisory Council for Science and Technology. 1968. Technological Innovation in Britain. Report of the Central Advisory Council for Science and Technology. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Chairmen of the Advisory Council for Applied Research and Development (ACARD) and the Advisory Board for the Research Councils (ABRC). 1976. The Science Base and Industry. Second Joint Report. Cm 34. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Chalaby, Jean K. 1996. ‘Twenty Years of Contrast: The French and British Press during the Inter-War Period’. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie 37, no. 1: 143–59.Google Scholar
Chambers, David Wade, and Gillespie, Richard. 2000. ‘Locality in the History of Science: Colonial Science, Technoscience, and Indigenous Knowledge’. Osiris 15, no. 1: 221–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channell, David. 1982. ‘The Harmony of Theory and Practice: The Engineering Science of W. J. M. Rankine’. Technology and Culture 23, no. 1: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaptal, Jean-Antoine Claude. 1893. Mes souvenirs sur Napoléon 1er. Ed. Chaptal, A.. Paris: Plon, Nourris.Google Scholar
Charles, G. W. 1951. ‘The Merchant Venturers’ Technical College, Bristol’. The Vocational Aspect of Secondary and Further Education 3, no. 6: 86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnley, Berris. 2013. ‘Experiments in Empire-Building: Mendelian Genetics as a National, Imperial, and Global Agricultural Enterprise’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44, no. 2: 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilvers, C. A. J. 2007. ‘Something Wicked This Way Comes: The Russian Delegation at the 1931 Second International Congress of the History of Science and Technology’. DPhil thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Cho, S. K. 2001. ‘The Special Loan Collection of Scientific Apparatus, 1876: The Beginning of the Science Museum of London and the Popularization of Physical Science’. PhD thesis, Seoul National University (in Korean).Google Scholar
Christen-Lécuyer, Carole, and Vatin, François (eds.). 2009. Charles Dupin (1784–1873): ingénieur, savant, économiste, pédagogue et parlementaire du Premier au Second Empire. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Christensen, Clayton M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Church, A. G. 1920. ‘Applied Science and Industrial Research’. Nature 105, no. 2640: 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, Randolph S. 1969. Winston S. Churchill, vol. 2: Companion Part II, 1907–1911. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Clarke, N. 1951. ‘Impressions of a Discussion on Technical Universities’. British Journal of Applied Physics 2, no. 9: 245–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Robin. 1968, ‘How the 300 GeV Decision Was Made.’ Science Journal, March: 4–7.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sabine. 2010. ‘Pure Science with a Practical Aim: The Meanings of Fundamental Research in Britain, circa 1916–1950’. Isis 101, no. 2: 285–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, Sabine. 2018. Science at the End of Empire: Experts and the Development of the British Caribbean, 1940–62. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Class, Monica. 2012. Coleridge and Kantian Ideas in England, 1796–1817: Coleridge’s Responses to German Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Clayton, Sir Robert, and Algar, Joan. 1988. The GEC Research Laboratories 1919–1984. London: Peter Peregrinus in association with the Science Museum, London.Google Scholar
Cline, Peter. 2014. ‘Winding Down the War Economy: British Plans for Peacetime Recovery, 1916–19’. In Burk, Kathleen (ed.), War and the State: The Transformation of British Government, 1914–1919. London: Routledge, 157–81.Google Scholar
Cockcroft, John. 1954. ‘Atomic Energy Research at Harwell’. Atomic Scientists Journal 4: 182–92.Google Scholar
Cockcroft, John. 1956. ‘The United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority and Its Functions’. British Journal of Applied Physics 7, no. 2: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1946. ‘Authenticity of Scientific Anecdotes’. Nature 157, no. 3981: 196–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1987. ‘Faraday and Franklin’s “Newborn Baby”’. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 131, no. 2: 177–82.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. C. 1956. ‘Industrial Growth and Industrial Revolutions’. Economica n.s. 23, no. 89: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. 1852a. ‘Blessed Are Ye That Sow beside all Waters: A Lay Sermon Addressed to the Higher and Middle Classes on the Existing Distresses and Discontents’. First published 1817. In Coleridge, Derwent (ed.), Lay Sermons. 3rd ed. London: Edward Moxon, 127–267.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. 1852b. On the Constitution of the Church and the State according to the Idea of Each. 4th ed., ed. Nelson Coleridge, Henry. First published 1830. London: Edward Moxon.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2010. ‘A Royal Society for Technology’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 64, Suppl. 1: S43–S54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2016. The Royal Society and the Promotion of Science since 1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collison, Robert. 1966. ‘Samuel Taylor Coleridge and the “Encyclopaedia Metropolitana”’. Journal of World History 9, no. 1: 751–68.Google Scholar
Commission on the College of Science for Ireland. 1867. Report of Commission on the College of Science for Ireland. P.P. 1867 (219) LV. 777-80.Google Scholar
Committee of Enquiry into the Engineering Profession. 1980. Engineering Our Future: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Engineering Profession. Cmnd 7794. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Committee of Enquiry into the Organisation of Civil Science. 1963. Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Organisation of Civil Science, under the Chairmanship of Sir Burke Trend. Cmnd 2171. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Committee on Science and the Public Welfare. 2020. ‘Report of the Committee on Science and the Public Welfare’. Published as part of Science – The Endless Frontier. Reprinted in celebration of the National Science Foundation’s 75th anniversary. Available at www.nsf.gov/about/history/EndlessFrontier_w.pdf, 77–149.Google Scholar
Conant, James Bryant. 1939. ‘Lesson from the Past’. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 31, no. 10: 1215–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, James Bryant. 1943. ‘Science and Society in the Post-War World: Interchange of Ideas and Discoveries Necessary’. Vital Speeches of the Day 9, no. 13: 394–97.Google Scholar
Converse, Elliott. 2012. History of Acquisition in the Department of Defense. Washington, DC: Historical Office, Office of the Secretary of Defense.Google Scholar
Cooper, Timothy. 2003. ‘The Science-Industry Relationship: The Case of Electrical Engineering in Manchester, 1914–1960’. PhD thesis, Manchester University.Google Scholar
Cooper, Timothy. 2011. ‘Peter Lund Simmonds and the Political Ecology of Waste Utilization in Victorian Britain’. Technology and Culture 52, no. 1: 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coopey, Richard. 1991a. ‘The White Heat of Scientific Revolution’. Contemporary Record 5, no. 1: 115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coopey, Richard. 1991b. ‘Ministry of Technology 1964–70’. Contemporary Record 5, no. 1: 128–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coopey, Richard. 1993. ‘Restructuring Civil and Military Science and Technology: The Ministry of Technology in the 1960s’. In Coopey, Richard, Uttley, Matthew, and Spinardi, Graham (eds.), Defence Science and Technology Adjusting to Change. Reading: Harwood Academic, 65–84.Google Scholar
Cornish, Caroline. 2013. ‘Curating Science in an Age of Empire: Kew’s Museum of Economic Botany’. PhD thesis, Royal Holloway College.Google Scholar
Costa, Ettore. 2020. ‘Whoever Launches the Biggest Sputnik Has Solved the Problems of Society? Technology and Futurism for Western European Social Democrats and Communists in the 1950s’. History of European Ideas 46, no. 1: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, Alan. 1980. ‘Science Policy in Britain’. Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain 52: 179–91.Google Scholar
Cottrell, Alan. 1992. ‘Sunlight and Shadow in Applied Science’. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 17: 120–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, Alan. 1993. ‘Foreword’. In S. T. Keith, The Fundamental Nucleus: A Study of the Impact of the British Atomic Energy Project on Basic Research. Harwell: AEA Technology, i–iii.Google Scholar
Cottrell, Alan. 1998. ‘Harwell: The First 50 Years’. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 23, no. 2: 139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council for Scientific Policy. 1966a. Report on Science Policy. Cmnd 3007. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Council for Scientific Policy. 1966b. Enquiry into the Flow of Candidates in Science and Technology into Higher Education, Interim Report. Cmnd 2893. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Council for Scientific Policy. 1967. Second Report on Science Policy. Cmnd 3420. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Council for Scientific Policy. 1968. Enquiry into the Flow of Candidates in Science and Technology into Higher Education. Cmnd 3541. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Council for Scientific Policy. 1972. Third Report of the Council for Scientific Policy. Cmnd 5117. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Counsel, Robert E. 1987. ‘The National Development Council of Wales and Monmouthshire 1932–55’. MA thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Crabu, Stefano. 2018. ‘Rethinking Biomedicine in the Age of Translational Research: Organisational, Professional, and Epistemic Encounters’. Sociology Compass 12, no. 10: doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, Nicholas, and Fearon, Peter. 2013. The Great Depression of the 1930s: Lessons for Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, August. 1908. ‘Ansprache des Prorektors der Universität’. In Zum Zehnjährigen Bestehen der Göttinger Vereinigung für Angewandte Physik und Mathematik. Wiesbaden: Vieweg und Teubner, 21–24.Google Scholar
Crane, E. J. 1944. ‘Growth of the Chemical Literature: Contributions of Certain Nations and the Effects of War’. Chemical and Engineering News 22, no. 17: 1478–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Charles. 1923–25. ‘Fact and Phantasy in Industrial Science’. Notices of the Proceedings at the Meetings of the Members of the Royal Institution 24: 1–5.Google Scholar
Crossley, R. 2011. ‘The First Wellsians: A Modern Utopia and Its Early Disciples’. English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920 54, no. 4: 444–69.Google Scholar
Crouch, Tom D. 2002. A Dream of Wings: Americans and the Airplane, 1875–1905. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Crowther, J. G. 1959. Six Great Engineers: De Lesseps, Brunel, Westinghouse, Parsons, Diesel, Hinton. London: H. Hamilton.Google Scholar
Cullen, Clara. 2009. ‘The Museum of Irish Industry, Robert Kane and Education for All in the Dublin of the 1850s and 1860s’. History of Education 38, no. 1: 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daglish, Neil. 1998. ‘“Over by Christmas”: The First World War, Education Reform and the Economy. The Case of Christopher Addison and the Origins of the DSIR’. History of Education 27, no. 3: 315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Mario, and Krige, John. 2018. ‘Beyond the Reach of Regulation? “Basic” and “Applied” Research in the Early Cold War United States’. Technology and Culture 59, no. 2: 226–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, S. M. 2017. ‘Organisation and Policy for Research and Development: The Health Department for England and Wales 1961 to 1986’. PhD thesis, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.Google Scholar
Davies, S. M. 2021. ‘Priorities in Medical Research: Elite Dynamics in a Pivotal Episode for British Health Research’. British Journal for the History of Science 54, no. 2: 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, George Edward. 1904. A Handbook of Chemical Engineering: Illustrated with Working Examples and Numerous Drawings from Actual Installations. Manchester: Davis Bros.Google Scholar
Davis, Martin. 1990. ‘Technology, Institutions and Status: Technological Education, Debate and Policy, 1944–1956’. In Summerfield, Penny and Evans, Eric J. (eds.), Technical Education and the State since 1850: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 120–44.Google Scholar
De Clerq, Peter. 2002–3. ‘The Special Loan Collection of Scientific Apparatus, South Kensington, 1876’. Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society, 72: 14–19; 73: 8–16; 73: 16–19; 76: 10–15.Google Scholar
De Vries, Marc. 2005. 80 Years of Research at the Philips Natuurkundig Laboratorium (1914–1994): The Role of the Nat. Lab. at Philips. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wit, Dirk. 1994. The Shaping of Automation: A Historical Analysis of the Interaction between Technology and Organization, 1950–1985. Hilversum: Uitgeverij Verloren.Google Scholar
Degrois, Denise. 1991. ‘S. T. Coleridge et l’Encyclopaedia Metropolitana: impératifs pratiques et conflits idéologiques’. In Becq, Annie (ed.), L’encyclopédisme: actes du colloque de Caen, 12–16 janvier 1987. Paris: Aux amateurs de livres, 431–35.Google Scholar
DeJager, Timothy. 1993. ‘Pure Science and Practical Interests: The Origins of the Agricultural Research Council, 1930–1937’. Minerva 31, no. 2: 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demant, V. A. 1932. This Unemployment: Disaster or Opportunity? London: Student Christian Movement Press.Google Scholar
Denton, Peter H. 2001. The ABC of Armageddon: Bertrand Russell on Science, Religion, and the Next War, 1919–1938. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. 2021. ‘UK to Launch New Research Agency to Support High Risk, High Reward Science’. Press release. Available at www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-to-launch-new-research-agency-to-support-high-risk-high-reward-science (accessed August 2022).Google Scholar
Department of Health. Research and Development Directorate. 2006. Best Research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Department of Overseas Trade. 1938. Guide to the Pavilion of His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom. Empire Exhibition, Scotland, 1938. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Department of Science and Art. 1857. Fourth Report of the Department of Science and Art. [2240]. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Department of Science and Art. 1857a. Prospectus of the Metropolitan School of Science Applied to Mining and the Arts: 3d session, 1857–58. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Department of Science and Art. 1899. Department of Science and Art: Forty-Sixth Report. c. 9191. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Dickens, Elizabeth. 2011. ‘“Permanent Books”: The Reviewing and Advertising of Books in the Nation and Athenaeum’. The Journal of Modern Periodical Studies 2, no. 2: 165–84.Google Scholar
Diebold, John. 1952 Automation: The Advent of the Automatic Factory. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Dietz, Burkhard, Fessner, Michael, and Maier, Helmut (eds.). 1996. Technische Intelligenz und ‘Kulturfactor Technik’. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Divall, Colin. 1990. ‘A Measure of Agreement: Employers and Engineering Studies in the Universities of England and Wales, 1897–1939’. Social Studies of Science 20, no. 1: 65–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divall, Colin. 2006. ‘Technological Networks and Industrial Research in Britain: The London, Midland & Scottish Railway, 1926–47’. Business History 48, no. 1: 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divall, Colin, and Johnston, Sean F.. 2000. Scaling Up: The Institution of Chemical Engineers and the Rise of a New Profession. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, Frank R. 1993. ‘The Social Construction of the Great Depression: Industrial Policy during the 1930s in the United States, Britain, and France’. Theory and Society 22, no. 1: 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, Frank R. 1994. Forging Industrial Policy: the United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodgson, Mark. 1990. ‘The Shock of the New: The Formation of Celltech and the British Technology Transfer System’. Industry and Higher Education 4, no. 2: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Kirstin L. 2014. ‘Experiment: A Manifesto of Young England, 1928–1931’. PhD thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Donnelly, James. 1986. ‘Representations of Applied Science: Academics and Chemical Industry in Late Nineteenth-Century England’. Social Studies of Science 16, no. 2: 195–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, James. 1987. ‘Chemical Education and the Chemical Industry in England from the Mid-Nineteenth to the Early Twentieth Century’. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, 1987.Google Scholar
Donnelly, James. 1989. ‘The Origins of the Technical Curriculum in England during the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries’. Studies in Science Education 16, no. 1: 123–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, James. 1997. ‘Getting Technical: The Vicissitudes of Academic Industrial Chemistry in Nineteenth-Century Britain’. History of Education 26, no. 2: 125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drayton, Richard Harry. 2000. Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain, and the ‘Improvement’ of the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Drummond, Diane. 2020. ‘Pure and Applied Science in the New University 1900–1914’. In Mussell, James and Gooday, Graeme (eds.), A Pioneer of Connection: Recovering the Life and Work of Oliver Lodge. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 431–35.Google Scholar
Drummond, Ian M. 1971. ‘More on British Colonial Aid Policy in the Nineteen-Thirties’. Canadian Journal of History 6, no. 2: 189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[DSIR]. 1916. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1915–16. Cd 8336. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
[DSIR]. 1917a. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1916–17. Cd 8718. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
[DSIR]. 1917b. Report of the Fuel Research Board on Their Scheme of Research and on the Establishment of a Fuel Research Station. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
[DSIR]. 1919. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1918–19. Cmd 320. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
[DSIR]. 1920. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1919–20. Cmd 905. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
[DSIR]. 1921. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1920–21. Cmd 1491. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
[DSIR]. 1923. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1922–23. Cmd 1937. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
[DSIR]. 1924. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1923–24. Cmd 2223. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
[DSIR]. 1925. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1924-25. Cmd 2491. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
[DSIR]. 1927. Report of the Committee of the Privy Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for the Year, 1925–26. Cmd 2782. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DSIR. 1927. Co-operative Industrial Research: An Account of the Work of Research Associations under the Government Scheme. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DSIR Economics Committee. 1958. Estimates of Resources Devoted to Scientific and Engineering Research and Development in British Manufacturing Industry, 1955. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, John P. D. 1975. ‘British Rearmament in the 1930s: A Chronology and Review’. The Historical Journal 18, no. 3: 587–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Robert Kennedy. 1907. The Chemistry of Commerce: A Simple Interpretation of Some New Chemistry in Its Relation to Modern Industry. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Eaglesham, E. J. 1963. ‘The Centenary of Sir Robert Morant’. British Journal of Educational Studies 12, no. 1: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ede, Andrew. 2002. ‘The Natural Defense of a Scientific People: The Public Debate over Chemical Warfare in Post-WWI America’. Bulletin for the History of Chemistry 27. no. 2: 128–35.Google Scholar
Edge, David. 1995. ‘Reinventing the Wheel’. In Jasanoff, Sheila, Markle, Gerald, Petersen, James, and Pinch, Trevor (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 3–23.Google Scholar
Edgerton, David. 1996. ‘The “White Heat” Revisited: The British Government and Technology in the 1960s’. Twentieth Century British History 7, no. 1: 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgerton, David. 1997. ‘The Decline of Declinism’. Business History Review 71, no. 2: 201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgerton, David. 2004. ‘“The Linear Model” Did Not Exist: Reflections on the History and Historiography of Science and Research in Industry in the Twentieth Century’. In Grandin, Karl, Wormbs, Nina, and Widmalm, Sven (eds.), The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications. New York: Watson, 31–57.Google Scholar
Edgerton, David. 2006. Warfare State: Britain, 1920–1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edgerton, David. 2009. The “Haldane Principle” and Other Invented Traditions in Science Policy’. History and Policy. www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/the-haldane-principle-and-other-invented-traditions-in-science-policy (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Edgerton, David. 2011. Britain’s War Machine: Weapons, Resources, and Experts in the Second World War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edgerton, David. 2018. The Rise and Fall of the British Nation: A Twentieth-Century History. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Edgerton, David, and Horrocks, Sally. 1994. ‘British Industrial Research and Development before 1945’. Economic History Review 47, no. 2: 213–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Pamela. 2012. ‘Coleridge on Politics and Religion: The Statesman’s Manual, Aids to Reflection, On the Constitution of Church and State’. In Burwick, Frederick (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 236–53.Google Scholar
Elliot, Walter. 1931. ‘The World of the Empire Marketing Board’. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 79, no. 4101: 736–48.Google Scholar
Empire Exhibition, Scotland. 1938. Empire Exhibition: Official Guide. Glasgow: Empire Exhibition.Google Scholar
English, Richard, and Kenny, Michael. 1999. ‘British Decline or the Politics of Declinism?’ The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 1, no. 2: 252–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, Richard, and Kenny, Michael. 2000. Rethinking British Decline. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
English, Richard, and Kenny, Michael. 2001. ‘Public Intellectuals and the Question of British Decline’. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 3, no. 3: 259–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Equal to Six Trafalgar Squares: The Palace of Engineering’. 1924. Illustrated London News, 24 May: 18.Google Scholar
Eschenburg, Johann Joachim. 1792. Lehrbuch der Wissenschaftskunde: Ein Grundriss Encyclopaedischer Vorlesung. Berlin: Friedrich Nicolai.Google Scholar
Fabian Society. 1923. Is Civilisation Decaying? A Course of Six Lectures to Be Given at King’s Hall, King St., Covent Garden, on Tuesdays at 8.30 p.m., Beginning 16th October, 1923. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
Falby, Alison. 2008. Between the Pigeonholes: Gerald Heard, 1889–1971. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Farrall, Lyndsey Andrew. 2019. ‘The Origins and Growth of the English Eugenics Movement, 1865–1925’. PhD thesis, University of Indiana (1969). Reissued by University College London, Department of Science and Technology Studies, as STS Occasional Paper, no. 9: www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/sts-research/sts-occasional-papers-series (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Farrar, W. V. 1972. ‘The Society for the Promotion of Scientific Industry 1872–1876’. Annals of Science 29, no. 1: 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favretto, Ilaria. 2000. ‘“Wilsonism” Reconsidered: Labour Party Revisionism 1952–64’. Contemporary British History 14, no. 4: 54–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federation of British Industries (FBI). 1947. Scientific and Technical Research in British Industry: A Statistical Survey. London: FBI.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 1995. ‘Public Narration and Group Culture: Discerning Discourse in Social Movements’. In Johnston, Hank and Klandermans, Bert (eds.), Social Movements and Culture. 127–43. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, David. 2006. Print Culture and the Blackwood Tradition, 1805–1930. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, Mark R. 1991. ‘The Rehabilitation of an Agricultural Chemist: Justus von Liebig and the Seventh Edition’. Ambix 38, no. 3: 155–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finney, Patrick. 2000. ‘The Romance of Decline: The Historiography of Appeasement and British National Identity’. Electronic Journal of International History 1: ISSN 1471-1443.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. P. M. 1930. ‘The Profession of Engineering. Promising Fields in the Future’. Journal of Careers 9, no. 100: 9–14.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. P. M. 1932. ‘The Development of Invention: Bridging the Gap between the Birth of an Idea and its Industrial Application’. In Mackay, R. J. (ed.), Business and Science: Being Collected Papers Read to the Department of Industrial Co-operation at the Centenary Meeting of the British Association … 1931. London: British Association for the Advancement of Science, Department of Industrial Cooperation, 245–50.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. P. M. 1933. ‘Research and Industrial Development. Is a New Organisation Required?’ State Service 13: 31–32.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. P. M., and Brockelhurst, H. J.. 1925. A History of Engineering. London: Black.Google Scholar
Flink, Tim, and Kaldewey, David. 2018. ‘The Language of Science Policy in the Twenty-First Century: What Comes after Basic and Applied Research?’ In Kaldewey, David and Schauz, Désirée (eds.), Basic and Applied Research: The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. New York: Berghahn, 251–84.Google Scholar
Floud, Roderick, and Glynn, Sean (eds.). 2000. London Higher: The Establishment of Higher Education in London. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
Foden, Frank. 1951. ‘The National Certificate’. The Vocational Aspect of Secondary and Further Education 3, no. 6: 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foden, Frank. 1961. ‘A History of Technical Examinations in England to 1918 with Special Reference to the Examination Work of the City and Guilds of London Institute’. PhD thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Foden, Frank. 1970. Philip Magnus: Victorian Educational Pioneer. London: Vallentine & Mitchell.Google Scholar
Fontanon, Claudine, et al. (eds.). 1994. Les professeurs du Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers: dictionnaire biographique, 1794–1955. Paris: Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique and Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers.Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, James, and Hannah, Leslie. 1999. ‘Britain: From Economic Liberalism to Socialism – And Back?’ In Foreman-Peck, James and Federico, Giovanni (eds.), European Industrial Policy: The Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 18–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgan, Sophie. 2003. ‘Atoms in Wonderland: The Presentation of Atomic Science in Britain in Museums, Exhibitions and Print, 1945–1960’. History and Technology 19, no. 3: 177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, Paul. 2007. ‘The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology’. History and Technology 23, nos. 1–2: 1–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, Paul, Heilbron, John L., and Weart, Spencer. 1975. ‘Physics circa 1900: Personnel, Funding and Productivity of the Academic Establishments’. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fort, Daniel G., et al. 2017. ‘Mapping the Evolving Definitions of Translational Research’. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 1, no. 1: 60–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, Robert. 1974. ‘Education for a New Age: The Conservatoire des Arts et Métiers, 1815–30’. In Cardwell, D. S. L. (ed.), Artisan to Graduate: Essays to Commemorate the Foundation in 1824 of the Manchester Mechanics’ Institution, Now in 1974 the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 25–38.Google Scholar
Francis, R. Douglas. 2009. The Technological Imperative in Canada: An Intellectual History. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 1979. ‘Eugenics and Progressive Thought: A Study in Ideological Affinity’. The Historical Journal 22, no. 3: 645–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeden, Michael. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Christopher, and Soete, Luc. 2009. ‘Developing Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: What We Can Learn from the Past’. Research Policy 38, no. 4: 583–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Georges. 1936. La crise du progrès: esquisse d’histoire des idées, 1895–1935. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Friday, James. 1974. ‘The Braggs and Broadcasting’. Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain 47: 59–85.Google Scholar
Fry, R. H. 1956. ‘The Breaking of the Crust’. Manchester Guardian Survey of Industry, Trade and Finance (March): 44–58.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 2004. ‘Removing Knowledge’. Critical Inquiry 31, no. 1: 229–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, Peter. 2010. ‘Secrecy in Three Acts’. Social Research 77, no. 3: 941–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. 2009. The Body Economic: Life, Death, and Sensation in Political Economy and the Victorian Novel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, W. B. 1955. ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s. 56: 167–98.Google Scholar
Galton, Francis. 1909. Essays in Eugenics. London: Eugenics Education Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambles, Anna. 1998. ‘Rethinking the Politics of Protection: Conservatism and the Corn Laws, 1830–52’. English Historical Review, 113, no. 453: 928–52.Google Scholar
Garfield, Simon. 2022. All the Knowledge in the World: The Extraordinary History of the Encyclopaedia. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Gay, Hannah. 2000. ‘Association and Practice: The City and Guilds of London Institute for the Advancement of Technical Education’. Annals of Science 57, no. 4: 369–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Hannah. 2007. The History of Imperial College London 1907–2007: Higher Education and Research in Science, Technology and Medicine. London: Imperial College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georges, R. A. 1969. ‘Toward an Understanding of Storytelling Events’. Journal of American Folklore 82, no. 326: 313–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georges, R. A. 1994. ‘The Concept of “Repertoire” in Folkloristics’. Western Folklore 53, no. 4: 313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georghiou, Luke, Metcalfe, J. Stanley, Gibbons, Michael, Ray, Tim, and Evans, Janet. 1986. ‘Wealth from Knowledge Revisited’. In Georghiou, Luke, Evans, Janet, Ray, Tim, Metcalfe, J. Stanley, and Gibbons, Michael (eds.), Post–Innovation Performance Technological Development and Competition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gere, Cathy. 2009. Knossos and the Prophets of Modernism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Michael. 1970. ‘The CERN 300 GeV Accelerator: A Case Study in the Application of the Weinberg Criteria’. Minerva 8, no. 1: 180–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Michael, and Johnston, Ron. 1974. ‘The Roles of Science in Technological Innovation’. Research Policy 3, no. 3: 220–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Michael, Limoges, Camille, Nowotny, Helga, Schwartzman, Simon, Scott, Peter, and Trow, Martin. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Giffard, Hermione. 2020. ‘Engine of Innovation: The Royal Aircraft Establishment, State Design and the Coming of the Gas Turbine Aero-Engine in Britain’. Contemporary British History 34, no. 2: 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Marion. 2008. A Strange and Formidable Weapon: British Responses to World War I Poison Gas. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gispen, Kees. 1989. New Profession, Old Order: Engineers and German Society, 1815–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glazebrook, Richard. 1905. ‘Science and Industry’. Times Engineering Supplement 1, no. 31 (27 September): 245–46.Google Scholar
Glazebrook, Richard. 1917. Science and Industry, the Place of Cambridge in Any Scheme for Their Combination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazebrook, Richard. 1918. ‘The National Industrial Research Laboratory’. Engineering 105 (8 March): 252–56.Google Scholar
Glazebrook, Richard. 1933. ‘Early Days at the National Physical Laboratory’. Lecture delivered March 23, 1933. London: National Physical Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, Benoit. 2003. ‘Measuring Science: Is There “Basic Research” without Statistics?’ Social Science Information 42, no. 1: 57–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, Benoit. 2006. ‘The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework’. Science Technology and Human Values 31, no. 6: 639–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, Benoit. 2007. ‘Science, Accounting and Statistics: The Input-Output Framework’. Research Policy 36, no. 9: 1388–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, Benoit. 2008. ‘In the Shadow of Schumpeter: W. Rupert Maclaurin and the Study of Technological Innovation’. Minerva 46, no. 3: 343–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, Benoit. 2015. Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation over the Centuries. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, Benoit. 2017. Models of Innovation: The History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, Benoit. 2019. The Invention of Technological Innovation: Languages, Discourses and Ideology in Historical Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, Benoit, and Lane, Joseph P.. 2013. ‘Pushes and Pulls: Hi(S)Tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation’. Science, Technology, & Human Values 38, no. 5: 621–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, Benoit, and Schauz, Désirée. 2016. ‘The Changing Identity of Research: A Cultural and Conceptual History’. History of Science 54, no. 3: 276–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinski, Jan. 1983. ‘Peter Shaw: Chemistry and Communication in Augustan England’. Ambix 30, no. 1: 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinski, Jan. 1992. Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gollin, Alfred M. 1981. ‘England Is No Longer an Island: The Phantom Airship Scare of 1909’. Albion 13, no. 1: 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooday, Graeme. 2000. ‘Lies, Damned Lies and Declinism: Lyon Playfair, the Paris 1867 Exhibition and the Contested Rhetorics of Scientific Education and Industrial Performance’. In Inkster, I. (ed.), The Golden Age: Essays in British Social and Economic History 1850–1870. Aldershot: Ashgate, 105–20.Google Scholar
Gooday, Graeme. 2012. ‘“Vague and Artificial”: The Historically Elusive Distinction between Pure and Applied Science’. Isis 103, no. 3: 546–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodeve, Charles. 1972. ‘Frank Edward Smith’. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 18: 532–33.Google Scholar
Gordon, W. R. 1934. ‘The Utilisation of Coal’. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 82, no. 4255: 756–80.Google Scholar
Gosden, P. H. J. H., and Taylor, A. J. (eds.). 1975. Studies in the History of a University, 1874–1974. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Google Scholar
Gowing, Margaret Mary. 1990. ‘Lord Hinton of Bankside, O.M., F. Eng. 12 May 1901–22 June 1983’. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 36: 218–39.Google Scholar
Gowing, Margaret Mary, and Arnold, Lorna. 1974. Independence and Deterrence. Britain and Atomic Energy 1945–1952, vol. 2: Policy Execution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Grant, Alexander. 1884. The Story of the University of Edinburgh during Its First Three Hundred Years. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Greg, Henry P. 1916. ‘The Lancashire Sections. Research in the Cotton Trade’. Journal of the Textile Institute 7, no. 3: 244–49.Google Scholar
Gregory, Richard. 1916. Discovery, or The Spirit and Service of Science. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grelon, André. 2000. ‘Du bon usage du modèle étranger: la mise en place de l’École centrale des arts et manufactures’. Bulletin de la Sabix 26: 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greysmith, D. 1990. ‘The Empire as Infinite Resource: The Work of P. L. Simmonds (1814–1897)’. Journal of Newspaper and Periodical History 6, no. 1: 3–15.Google Scholar
Guagnini, Anna. 2010. ‘The Fashioning of Higher Technical Education in Britain: The Case of Manchester, 1851–1914’. In Gospel, Howard F. (ed.), Industrial Training and Technological Innovation. London: Routledge, 65–83.Google Scholar
Guise, George. 2014. ‘Margaret Thatcher’s Influence on British Science’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 68, no. 3: 301–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gummett, Philip. 1971. ‘British Science Policy and the Advisory Council on Scientific Policy’. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Gummett, Philip. 1980. Scientists in Whitehall. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gummett, Philip, and Gibbons, Michael. 1978. ‘Redeployment and Diversification at Harwell’. Omega 6, no. 1: 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummett, Philip, and Price, Geoffrey. 1977. ‘An Approach to the Central Planning of British Science: The Formation of the Advisory Council on Scientific Policy’. Minerva 15, no. 2: 119–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummett, Philip, and Williams, Roger. 1972. ‘Assessing the Council for Scientific Policy’. Nature 240, no. 5380: 329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, R. T. 1925. Historic Instruments for the Advancement of Science: A Handbook to the Oxford Collections Prepared for the Opening of the Lewis Evans Collection of May 5, 1925. London: Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar
Gusewelle, J. K. 1977. ‘Science and the Admiralty during World War I: The Case of the BIR’. In Jordan, Gerald (ed.), Naval Warfare in the Twentieth Century, 1900–1945: Essays in Honour of Arthur Marder. London: Taylor & Francis, 103–17.Google Scholar
Hackmann, Willem Dirk. 1984. Seek and Strike: Sonar, Anti-Submarine Warfare and the Royal Navy 1914–54. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hackmann, Willem Dirk. 1988. ‘Sonar, Wireless Telegraphy and the Royal Navy: Scientific Development in a Military Context, 1890–1939’. In Rupke, Nicholaas A. (ed.), Science, Politics and the Public Good: Essays in Honour of Margaret Gowing. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haigh, Alice. 2021. ‘“To Strive, to Seek, to Find”: The Origins and Establishment of the British Post Office Engineering Research Station at Dollis Hill, 1908–1938’. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. 1929. ‘The Place of Science in Western Civilisation’. The Realist 2, no. 2: 49–164.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C. I. 2014. ‘Three Cultures at the Admiralty, c. 1800–1945: Naval Staff, the Secretariat and the Arrival of Scientists’. Journal for Maritime Research 16, no. 1: 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hance, Nicholas John. 2006. Harwell: The Enigma Revealed. Buckland: Enhance Publishing.Google Scholar
Hansard HC Deb. 24 March 1868. Vol. 191, cols. 160–65. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1868/mar/24/motion-for-a-select-committee (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Hansard HC Deb. 29 April 1909. Vol. 4, cols. 473–619. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1909/apr/29/revenue-and-expenditure-for-1909-10 (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Hansard HC Deb. 2 August 1909. Vol. 8, cols. 1564–617. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1909/aug/02/naval-and-military-aeronautics (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Hansard HC Deb. 27 July 1925. Vol. 187, cols. 49–50W. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/1925/jul/27/scientific-research (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Hansard HC Deb. 25 May 1938, Vol. 336, cols. 1233–348. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1938/may/25/air-defences (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Hansard HC Deb. 30 November 1945, Vol. 416, cols. 1846–47. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1945/nov/30/scientific-manpower-and-resources (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Hansard HC Deb. 21 July 1969. Vol. 787, cols. 1237–368. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1969/jul/21/civil-science (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Hansard. HL Deb. 11 November 1852. Vol. 123, cols. 17–21. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1852/nov/11/the-queens-speech (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Hansard. HL Deb. 15 November 1961. Vol. 235, cols. 648–728. Available at https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1961/nov/15/technical-and-scientific-manpower-and (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Hård, Mikael. 1998. ‘German Regulation: The Integration of Modern Technology into National Culture’. In Hård, Mikael and Jamison, Andrew (eds.), The Intellectual Appropriation of Technology: Discourses on Modernity 1900–1939. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 39–67.Google Scholar
Hartcup, Guy, and Allibone, T. E.. 1984. Cockcroft and the Atom. Bristol: Adam Hilger.Google Scholar
Hartley, Harold. 1937. ‘Agriculture as a Source of Raw Materials for Industry’. Journal of the Textile Institute 28: 151–72.Google Scholar
Harvey, Mark, and McMeekin, Andrew. 2007. Public or Private Economies of Knowledge? Turbulence in the Biological Sciences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, Mark, and McMeekin, Andrew. 2010. ‘Public or Private Economies of Knowledge: The Economics of Diffusion and Appropriation of Bioinformatics Tools’. International Journal of the Commons 4, no. 1: 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, Jonathan. 2005. Technology’s Dilemma Agricultural Colleges between Science and Practice in Germany, 1860–1934. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Harwood, Jonathan. 2006. ‘Engineering Education between Science and Practice: Rethinking the Historiography’. History and Technology 22, no. 1: 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, Jonathan. 2010. ‘Understanding Academic Drift: On the Institutional Dynamics of Higher Technical and Professional Education’. Minerva 48, no. 4: 413–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, Takehiko. 2000. ‘The Wind Tunnel and the Emergence of Aeronautical Research in Britain’. In Galison, Peter and Roland, Alex (eds.), Atmospheric Flight in the Twentieth Century. Dordrecht: Springer, 223–39.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Takehiko. 2007. ‘Leonard Bairstow as a Scientific Middleman: Early Aerodynamic Research on Airplane Stability in Britain, 1909–1920’. Historia Scientiarum. 2nd Series 17, no. 2: 103–20.Google Scholar
Hastings, Adrian. 2001. A History of English Christianity, 1920–2000. 4th ed. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Sarah. 2015. ‘Industrial Automation and Stress, c. 1945–79’. In Jackson, Mark (ed.), Stress in Post-War Britain, 1945–1985. London: Routledge, 75–93.Google Scholar
Haynes, Roslynn. 1980. H. G. Wells, Discoverer of the Future: The Influence of Science on His Thought. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, Gerald. 1931. ‘This Surprising World’. The Listener 6, no. 137 (26 August): 340.Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, F. C. 1929. Centenary History of King’s College London 1828–1928. London: G. G. Harrap.Google Scholar
Hempstead, Colin, and Cookson, Gillian. 2000. A Victorian Scientist and Engineer: Fleeming Jenkin and the Birth of Electrical Engineering. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hendry, John. 1991. ‘Technological Decision Making in Its Organizational Context: Nuclear Power Reactor Development in Britain’. Cambridge University Engineering Department, Research Paper 4/91.Google Scholar
Hennessy, Peter. 2018. ‘Searching for the Holy Grail of a Science and Innovation Strategy That Makes a Difference’. FST Journal 22, no. 2: 7–9.Google Scholar
Hennock, E. P. 1990. ‘Technological Education in England, 1850–1926: The Uses of a German Model’. History of Education 19, no. 4: 299–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensley, Oliver D. (ed.). 1988. The Classification of Research. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar
Herklots, Hugh. 1928. The New Universities: An External Examination. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
Hill-Andrews, Oliver. 2015. ‘Interpreting Science: J. G. Crowther and the Making of Interwar British Culture’. PhD thesis, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Hinton, Christopher. 1953. ‘Atomic Energy Developments in Great Britain’. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 9, no. 10: 366–68, 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, James. 2013. The Mass Observers: A History, 1937–1949. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HM Treasury. 1930. Report of the Committee on the Staffs of Government Scientific Establishments. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hodge, Joseph Morgan. 2007. Triumph of the Expert: Agrarian Doctrines of Development and the Legacies of British Colonialism. Athens: Ohio University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Joseph Morgan. 2011. ‘Science and Empire: An Overview of the Historical Scholarship’. In Bennett, B. M. and Hodge, J. M. (eds.), Science and Empire: Knowledge and Networks of Science across the British Empire, 1800–1970. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollinger, David. 1995. ‘Science as a Weapon in Kulturkämpfe in the United States during and after World War II’. Isis 86, no. 3: 440–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmfeld, John D. 1970 ‘From Amateurs to Professionals in American Science: The Controversy over the Proceedings of an 1853 Scientific Meeting’. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 114, no. 1: 22–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Homburg, Ernst. 1986. ‘De “Tweede Industriële Revolutie”: Een Problematisch Historisch Concept’. Theoretische Geschiedenis 13, no. 3: 367–85.Google Scholar
Horn, C. A., and Horn, P. L. R.. 1984. ‘The City of London Guilds and Technical Education in Victorian England’. Journal of Further and Higher Education 8, no. 1: 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, David. 1993. ‘The Road to Scarborough: Wilson, Labour and the Scientific Revolution’. In Coopey, Richard, Fielding, Richard, and Tiratsoo, Nick (eds.), The Wilson Governments. London: Pinter, 48–71.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Sally M. 1993. ‘Consuming Science: Science, Technology and Food in Britain, 1870–1939’. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Sally M. 2000. ‘A Promising Pioneer Profession? Women in Industrial Chemistry in Inter-War Britain’. British Journal for the History of Science 33, no. 3: 351–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hottois, Gilbert. 2018. ‘Technoscience: From the Origin of the Word to Its Current Uses’. In Loeve, Sacha, Guchet, Xavier, and Vincent, Bernadette Bensaude (eds.), French Philosophy of Technology: Classical Readings and Contemporary Approaches. Cham: Springer, 121–38.Google Scholar
Houghton, Esther Rhoads. 1979. ‘A “New” Editor of the “British Critic”’. Victorian Periodicals Review 12, no. 3: 102–5.Google Scholar
Hounshell, David A. 1980. ‘Edison and the Pure Science Ideal in 19th-Century America’. Science n.s. 207, no. 4431: 612–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hounshell, David A. 2000. ‘Automation, Transfer Machinery, and Mass Production in the U.S. Automobile Industry in the Post–World War II Era’. Enterprise & Society 1, no. 1: 100–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Commons Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee. 2008–9. Minutes of Evidence. Office for Strategic Coordination of Health Research, HC 655–I. Available at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmdius/655i/9060801.htm (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. 1988. Priorities in Medical Research. HL 54-1. Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hughes, Helen. 2021. ‘Film and the British Atomic Project’. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 42, no. 2: 219–43.Google Scholar
Hughes, Jeff. 1998. ‘Plasticine and Valves: Industry, Instrumentation and the Emergence of Nuclear Physics’. In Gaudillière, Jean-Paul and Löwy, Ilana (eds.), The Invisible Industrialist: Manufacturers and the Production of Scientific Knowledge. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 58–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Jeff. 2016. ‘Unity through Experiment? Reductionism, Rhetoric and the Politics of Nuclear Science, 1918–40’. In Kamminga, Harmke and Sommsen, Geert (eds.), Pursuing the Unity of Science: Ideology and Scientific Practice from the Great War to the Cold War. London: Routledge, 50–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Jeff. 2018. ‘A Portrait of the Scientist as a Young Ham: Wireless, Modernity and Nuclear Physics’. In Bud, Robert, Greenhalgh, Paul, James, Frank, and Shiach, Morag (eds.), Being Modern: The Cultural Impact of Science in the Early Twentieth Century. London: UCL Press, 245–73.Google Scholar
Hull, Andrew J. 1994. ‘Passwords to Power: A Public Rationale for Expert Influence on Central Government Policy-Making: British Scientists and Economists c. 1900–c. 1925’. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Hull, Andrew J. 1999. ‘War of Words: The Public Science of the British Scientific Community and the Origins of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, 1914–16’. British Journal for the History of Science 32, no. 4: 461–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, L. J. 1958. ‘The Origins of the Haldane Report’. Australian Journal of Public Administration 17, no. 4: 344–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Bruce J. 1983. ‘“Practice vs. Theory”: The British Electrical Debate, 1888–1891’. Isis 74, no. 3: 341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, Eric. 1969. ‘Scientists and Civil Servants: The Struggle over the National Physical Laboratory in 1918’. Minerva 7, no. 3: 373–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, Eric. 1972. ‘A Fruitful Cooperation between Government and Academic Science: Food Research in the United Kingdom’. Minerva 10, no. 1: 19–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, Eric. 1975. ‘The Origins of the University Grants Committee’. Minerva 13, no. 4: 583–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, Aldous. 1931. ‘Sight-Seeing-in-Alien-Englands’. Nash’s Pall Mall Magazine, June: 50–53, 118.Google Scholar
Huxley, Aldous. 1932b ‘Science: The Double-Edged Tool’. The Listener 7, no. 158 (20 January): 77–79 and 112.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian 1936. ‘Science and Its Relation to Social Needs’. In Scientific Progress. London: George Allen & Unwin, 175–210.Google Scholar
Illinois Institute of Technology. 1968. Technology in Retrospect and Critical Events in Science. Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology, Research Institute.Google Scholar
Inge, William Ralph. 1930. Christian Ethics and Modern Problems. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Inkster, Ian. 1991. Science and Technology in History: An Approach to Industrial Development. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Paul. 1992. From Machine Shop to Industrial Laboratory: Telegraphy and the Changing Context of American Invention, 1830–1920. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ives, Eric William, Schwarz, L. D., and Drummond, Diane K.. 2000. The First Civic University: Birmingham 1880–1980: An Introductory History. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Annie. 2015. The Pentagon’s Brain: An Uncensored History of DARPA, America’s Top Secret Research Agency. New York: Little, Brown, 2015.Google Scholar
James, C. L. R. 2003. ‘A Visit to the Science and Art Museums’. First published 1932. In Buhle, Paul and Henry, Patrick (eds.), Letters from London: Seven Essays. London: Signal Books, 1–14.Google Scholar
James, F. A. J. L. 2008. ‘The Janus Face of Modernity: Michael Faraday in the Twentieth Century’. The British Journal for the History of Science 41, no. 4: 477–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2015. ‘Future Imperfect: Science, Technology and the Imaginations of Modernity’. In Jasanoff, Sheila and Kim, Sang-Hyun (eds.), Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkin, John G. 2011. ‘Atomic Energy Is “Moonshine”: What Did Rutherford Really Mean?’ Physics in Perspective 13, no. 2: 128–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, E. W. 1973. ‘The Board of Education and the Reconstruction Committee, 1916–1918’. Journal of Educational Administration and History 5, no. 1: 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jephcott, Sir Harry. 1965. ‘The Glaxo Research Organization’. In Cockcroft, Sir John (ed.), The Organization of Scientific Establishments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–67.Google Scholar
Jevons, F. R. 1972. ‘Preface’. In J. Langrish, M. Gibbons, W. G. Evans, and F. R. Jevons, Wealth from Knowledge: Studies of Innovation in Industry. London: Macmillan, ix–xiii.Google Scholar
Jevons, F. R. 1976. ‘The Interaction of Science and Technology Today, or, Is Science the Mother of Invention?’ Technology and Culture 17, no. 4: 729–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewkes, John. 1960. ‘How Much Science?’ The Economic Journal 70, no. 277: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewkes, John, Sawers, David, and Stillerman, Richard. 1958. The Sources of Invention. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnson, Paul Barton. 1969. Land Fit for Heroes: The Planning of British Reconstruction, 1916–1919. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. F. W. 1847. Lectures on Agricultural Chemistry and Geology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: W. Blackwood.Google Scholar
Jones, Allan. 2012. ‘Mary Adams and the Producer’s Role in Early BBC Science Broadcasts’. Public Understanding of Science 21, no. 8: 968–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Allan. 2020. ‘Science in the Making: 1930s Citizen Science on the BBC’. History of Education 49, no. 3: 327–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Aubrey. 1985. Britain’s Economy: The Roots of Stagnation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Edgar. 1996. University College Durham: A Social History. Aberystwyth: E. Jones.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter. 2004. ‘Posting the Future: British Stamp Design and the “White Heat” of a Technological Revolution’. Journal of Design History 17, no. 2: 163–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Peter M. 2008. Industrial Enlightenment: Science, Technology and Culture in Birmingham and the West Midlands, 1760–1820. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter M. 2016. Agricultural Enlightenment: Knowledge, Technology, and Nature, 1750–1840. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Richard. 2019. ‘A Resurgence of the Regions: Rebuilding Innovation Capacity across the Whole UK’. Available at www.softmachines.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ResurgenceRegionsRALJv22_5_19.pdf (accessed May 2020).Google Scholar
Jones, Richard, and Wilsdon, James. 2018. The Biomedical Bubble: Why UK Research and Innovation Needs a Greater Diversity of Priorities, Politics, Places and People. London: NESTA.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. W. 1985. ‘The Cry for Useless Knowledge: Education for a New Victorian Technology’. IEE Proceedings A – Physical Science, Measurement and Instrumentation, Management and Education – Reviews 132, no. 8: 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Patrick. 1994. Democratic Subjects: The Self and the Social in Nineteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, David. 2005. ‘The Atomic Secret in Red Hands? American Suspicions of Theoretical Physicists during the Early Cold War’. Representations 90, no. 1: 28–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldewey, David, and Schauz, Desiree, 2018. Basic and Applied Research: The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century. New York: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kargon, Robert. 1977. Science in Victorian Manchester: Enterprise and Expertise. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kargon, Robert, and Knowles, Scott G.. 2002. ‘Knowledge for Use: Science, Higher Learning, and America’s New Industrial Heartland, 1880–1915’. Annals of Science 59, no. 1: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, John. 1938. The Will to Civilization: An Inquiry into the Principles of Historic Change London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Katzir, Shaul. 2012. ‘Who Knew Piezoelectricity? Rutherford and Langevin on Submarine Detection and the Invention of Sonar’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 66, no. 2: 141–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzir, Shaul. 2017. ‘“In War or In Peace”: The Technological Promise of Science Following the First World War’. Centaurus 59, no. 3: 223–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keanie, Andrew. 2012. ‘Coleridge and Plagiarism’. In Burwick, Frederick (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 435–54.Google Scholar
Keith, S. T. 1981. ‘Inventions, Patents and Commercial Development from Governmentally Financed Research in Great Britain: The Origins of the National Research Development Corporation’. Minerva 19, no. 1: 92–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, S. T. 1982. ‘The Role of Government Research Establishments: A Study of the Concept of Public Patronage for Applied Research and Development’. PhD thesis, Aston University.Google Scholar
Kelham, Brian B. 1967. ‘The Royal College of Science for Ireland (1867–1926)’. Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review 56, no. 223: 297–309.Google Scholar
Keller, Vera. 2015. Knowledge and the Public Interest, 1575–1725. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. 1976. ‘Walter Rosenhain and Materials Research at Teddington’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 282: 5–36.Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J. 1977. ‘The National Science Foundation and the Debate over Postwar Research Policy, 1942–1945: A Political Interpretation of Science – The Endless Frontier’. Isis 68, no. 1: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kevles, Daniel J. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. First published 1985. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
King, Alexander. 2001. ‘Scientific Concerns in an Economic Environment: Science in OEEC–OECD’. Technology in Society 23, no. 3: 337–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, M. W. 1999. ‘Blackett in the “White Heat” of the Scientific Revolution: Industrial Modernisation under the Labour Governments, 1964–1970’. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 50, no. 10: 985–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, F. A. 1998. ‘Twentieth-Century Industry: Obsolescence and Change. A Case Study: The ICI Coal to Oil Plant and Its Varied Uses’. Industrial Archaeology Review 20, no. 1: 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klancher, Jon P. 2013. Transfiguring the Arts and Sciences: Knowledge and Cultural Institutions in the Romantic Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, Bert, and Roggeband, Conny. 2007. Handbook of Social Movements across Disciplines. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Klein, Ursula. 2016. Nützliches Wissen: die Erfindung der Technikwissenschaften. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.Google Scholar
Klein, Ursula. 2020. Technoscience in History: Prussia, 1750–1850. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, R. 1995. ‘Construing “Technology” as “Applied Science”: Public Rhetoric of Scientists and Engineers in the United States, 1880–1945’. Isis 86, no. 2: 194–221.Google Scholar
Kline, R. 2015. The Cybernetics Moment, or Why We Call Our Age the Information Age. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kline, R., and Lassman, Thomas C.. 2005. ‘Competing Research Traditions in American Industry: Uncertain Alliances between Engineering and Science at Westinghouse Electric, 1886–1935’. Enterprise and Society 6, no. 4: 601–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, Maurice, Henkel, Mary, and Hanney, Steve. 2006. Government and Research: Thirty Years of Evolution. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, Wolfgang. 1996. ‘Science-Based Industry or Industry-Based Science? Electrical Engineering in Germany before World War I’. Technology and Culture 37, no. 1: 70–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2002. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Trans. Samuel Presner Todd. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, Alison. 2004. ‘Pragmatism, Patronage and Politics in English Biology: The Rise and Fall of Economic Biology 1904–1920’. Journal of the History of Biology 37, no. 2: 213–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labour Party. 1963. ‘Labour and the Scientific Revolution, a Statement of Policy Approved by the Annual Conference of the Labour Party Scarborough 1963’. Appendix 2. In The Labour Party. Report of the Sixty-Second Annual Conference. London: Labour Party, 272–75.Google Scholar
Lander, Bryn, and Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet. 2011. ‘Translational Science and the Hidden Research System in Universities and Academic Hospitals: A Case Study’. Social Science & Medicine 72, no. 4: 537–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langrish, J. 1988. Review of Post-innovation Performance: Technological Development and Competition by L. Georgiou et al. Research Policy 17, no. 2: 114–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langrish, J. 2023. It’s Not Physics. Part One: What’s It All about Then?. N.p.: Independently published.Google Scholar
Langrish, J., Gibbons, M., Evans, W. G., and Jevons, F. R.. 1972. Wealth from Knowledge: Studies of Innovation in Industry. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larédo, Philippe, and Mustar, Philippe. 2004. ‘Public Sector Research: A Growing Role in Innovation Systems’. Minerva 42, no. 1: 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laucht, Christopher. 2012. ‘Atoms for the People: The Atomic Scientists’ Association, the British State and Nuclear Education in the Atom Train Exhibition, 1947–1948’. British Journal for the History of Science 45, no. 4: 591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, David. 1974. Science for the People: The Origins of the School Science Curriculum in England. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. 2013. Two Cultures? The Significance of C. P. Snow. Introduction by Stefan Collini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Kenneth. 1923. ‘Industrial Research Associations’. Nature 112, no. 2825: 898–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leggett, Donald. 2015. Shaping the Royal Navy: Technology, Authority and Naval Architecture, c. 1830–1906. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Leggett, Donald. 2016. ‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Win You the War: Governing Science in the Royal Navy’. In Leggett, Don and Sleigh, Charlotte (eds.), Scientific Governance in Britain, 1914–79. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, Denys. 2000. ‘Municipal Progress, Democracy and Radical Identity in Birmingham, 1838–1886’. Midland History 25: 115–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessing, L. 1963. ‘The Three Ages of Science Writing’. Chemical & Engineering News, 41, no. 18: 88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, J. H. 1916. ‘Textile Research’. Journal of the Textile Institute 7, no. 3: 202–16.Google Scholar
Lightman, Bernard. 2007. Victorian Popularizers of Science: Designing Nature for New Audiences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightman, Bernard, McOuat, Gordon, and Stewart, Larry. 2013. The Circulation of Knowledge between Britain, India, and China: The Early-Modern World to the Twentieth Century. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘“Lightning” in a Laboratory: Man-Made “Thunder-Storms”’. 1930. Illustrated London News. 15 March: 428.Google Scholar
Lindenfeld, David F. 1997. The Practical Imagination: The German Sciences of State in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Local Government Board. 1919. Memorandum on the Provisions of the Ministry of Health Bill, 1919, as to the Work of the Medical Research Committee, (Clause 3 (1), proviso (i). Cmd 69. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Lodge, Oliver. 1926. Science and Human Progress: Halley Stewart Lectures 1926. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lord President of the Council. 1946. Scientific Man-Power: Report of a Committee Appointed by the Lord President of the Council. Cmd 6824. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Lord Privy Seal. 1971. A Framework for Government Research and Development. Cmnd 4814. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Lovell, Bernard. 1975. ‘Patrick Maynard Stuart Blackett, Baron Blackett, of Chelsea. 18 November 1897–13 July 1974’. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 21: 1–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucier, Paul. 2012. ‘The Origins of Pure and Applied Science in Gilded Age America’. Isis 103, no. 3: 527–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupton, M. C. 1964. ‘The Mosely Education Commission to the United States, 1903’. The Vocational Aspect of Secondary and Further Education 16, no. 33: 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, Lee T. 2018. Kew Observatory and the Evolution of Victorian Science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, D. H. 1927. ‘Rationalisation of Industry’. Economic Journal 37, no. 148: 521–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclaurin, W. Rupert. 1953. ‘The Sequence from Invention to Innovation and Its Relation to Economic Growth’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 67, no. 1: 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, George Edward. 1917. Studies in Higher Education in England and Scotland: With Suggestions for Universities and Colleges in the United States. Bulletin 1917, no. 16. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Education. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Christine. 2007. Heroes of Invention: Technology, Liberalism and British Identity, 1750–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Christine, and Radick, Gregory. 2013. ‘Claiming Ownership in the Technosciences: Patents, Priority and Productivity’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44, no. 2: 188–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Roy M. 1980. ‘On Visiting the “Moving Metropolis”: Reflections on the Architecture of Imperial Science’. Historical Records of Australian Science 5, no. 3: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Roy M. 1993. ‘The Chemists Go to War: The Mobilization of Civilian Chemists and the British War Effort, 1914–1918’. Annals of Science 50, no. 5: 455–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, Roy M. 1994. ‘Science for Imperial Efficiency and Social Change: Reflections on the British Science Guild, 1905–1936’. Public Understanding of Science 3, no. 2: 155–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Roy M. 1997. ‘On Science and Colonialism’. In Bowler, Peter and Whyte, Nicholas (eds.), Science and Society in Ireland: The Social Context of Science and Technology in Ireland 1800–1950. Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies, the Queen’s University of Belfast, 1–17.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Roy M. 2000. ‘Sight and Sound on the Western Front: Surveyors, Scientists, and the “Battlefield Laboratory”, 1915–1918’. War & Society 18, no. 1: 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Roy M. 2009a. ‘The Scientists Go to War: Revisiting Precept and Practice, 1914–1919’. Journal of War and Culture Studies 2, no. 1: 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Roy M. 2009b. Archibald Liversidge, FRS: Imperial Science under the Southern Cross. Sydney: Sydney University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Roy M., and Andrews, E. Kay. 1969. ‘The Committee of Civil Research: Scientific Advice for Economic Development 1925–30’. Minerva 7, no. 4: 680–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Roy M., and Andrews, E. Kay. 1970. ‘The Origins of the DSIR: Reflections on Ideas and Men, 1915–1916’. Public Administration 48, no. 1: 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Roy M., and Andrews, E. Kay. 1971. ‘Scientific Advice in the War at Sea, 1915–1917: The Board of Invention and Research’. Journal of Contemporary History 6, no. 2: 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnello, Eileen. 1999a. ‘The Non-Correlation of Biometrics and Eugenics: Rival Forms of Laboratory Work in Karl Pearson’s Career at University College London, Part 1’. History of Science 37, no. 1: 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnello, Eileen. 1999b. ‘The Non-Correlation of Biometrics and Eugenics: Rival Forms of Laboratory Work in Karl Pearson’s Career at University College London, Part 2’. History of Science 37, no. 2: 123–50.Google Scholar
Magnello, Eileen. 2000. A Century of Measurement: An Illustrated History of the National Physical Laboratory. Bath: Canopus.Google Scholar
Magnus, Sir Philip. 1910. Educational Aims and Efforts, 1880–1910. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Mah, Harold. 2000. ‘Phantasies of the Public Sphere: Rethinking the Habermas of Historians’. The Journal of Modern History 72, no. 1: 153–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmsten, Neal R. 1977. ‘British Government Policy toward Colonial Development, 1919–39’. Journal of Modern History 49, no. 2: D1249–D1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Peter (ed.). 2006. Liberty and Authority in Victorian Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Peter 2015. ‘Ben Pimlott Memorial Lecture 2014: The Two Cultures Revisited: The Humanities in British Universities since 1945’. Twentieth Century British History 26, no. 3: 400–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manegold, Karl Heinz. 1970. Universität, Technische Hochschule und Industrie: Ein Beitrag zur Emanzipation der Technik im 19. Jahrhundert unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Bestrebungen Felix Kleins. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuel, Jeffrey T. 2021. ‘Technical Literature and the Text-Searchable: The History of Technology and the Digitized Turn’. Technology’s Stories 8, no. 3. doi.org/10.15763/jou.ts.2021.01.05.04.Google Scholar
Marsden, Ben. 1992. ‘Engineering Science in Glasgow: W. J. M. Rankine and the Motive Power of Air’. PhD thesis, University of Kent.Google Scholar
Marsden, Ben. 2004. ‘The Progeny of These Two “Fellows”: Robert Willis, William Whewell and the Sciences of Mechanism, Mechanics and Machinery in Early Victorian Britain’. British Journal for the History of Science 37, no. 4: 401–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, R. W. 1953. ‘The Past and the Future of the Annals of Applied Biology’. Annals of Applied Biology 40, no. 3: 435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Ben. 2012. ‘The Evolution of Science Policy and Innovation Studies’. Research Policy 41, no. 7: 1219–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathers, Helen. 2005. Steel City Scholars: The Centenary History of the University of Sheffield. London: James & James.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Miwao. 2006. Technology Gatekeepers for War and Peace: The British Ship Revolution and Japanese Industrialisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, H. C. G. 1973. The Liberal Imperialists: The Ideas and Politics of a Post-Gladstonian Élite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Anna-Katherina. 1997. ‘Moralizing Science: The Uses of Science’s Past in National Education in the 1920s’. British Journal for the History of Science 30, no. 1: 51–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, Anna-Katherina. 2000. ‘“A Combative Sense of Duty”: Englishness and the Scientists’. In Lawrence, Christopher and Mayer, Anna-Katherina (eds.), Regenerating England: Science, Medicine and Culture in Inter-War Britain. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 67–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Anna-Katherina. 2005. ‘When Things Don’t Talk: Knowledge and Belief in the Interwar Humanism of Charles Singer (1876–1960)’. British Journal for the History of Science 38, no. 3: 325–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Otto. 1976. ‘The Science-Technology Relationship as a Historiographic Problem’. Technology and Culture 17, no. 4: 663–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazumdar, Pauline M. H. 1992. Eugenics, Human Genetics and Human Failings: The Eugenics Society, Its Sources and Its Critics in Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McAllister, John Francis Olivarius. 1987. ‘Civil Science Policy in British Industrial Reconstruction, 1942–51’. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
McCance, Andrew. 1960. ‘Cecil Henry Desch. 1874–1958’. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 5: 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClellan, James E. (ed.). 2008. The Applied-Science Problem: Papers from a Workshop at Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, NJ, May 6–8, 2005. Hoboken, NJ: Jensen/Daniels.Google Scholar
McCraw, Thomas K. 2009. Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McCulloch, Andrew. 2004. The Feeneys of the Birmingham Post. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, G. W., and Gospel, Howard F.. 1973. ‘The Mond-Turner Talks, 1927–1933: A Study in Industrial Co-operation’. Historical Journal 16, no. 4: 807–29.Google Scholar
McGee, Michael Calvin. 1980. ‘The “Ideograph”: A Link between Rhetoric and Ideology’. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66, no. 1: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGucken, William. 1978. ‘On Freedom and Planning in Science: The Society for Freedom in Science, 1940–46’. Minerva 16, no. 1: 42–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, A. M. 1976. ‘Corporate Technology: The Social Origins of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers’. Proceedings of the IEEE 64, no. 9: 1383–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNinch, Syl. 1984. ‘The Rise and Fall of RANN (Research Applied to National Needs)’. Ed. David E. Gould and Louise McIntire. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Mees, Charles Edward Kenneth. 1920. The Organization of Industrial Scientific Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mees, Charles Edward Kenneth. 1952. ‘Secrecy and Industrial Research’. Nature 170, no. 4336: 972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melville, Harry. 1962. ‘D.S.I.R. Does It Pay Off?’. Manchester: Manchester Statistical Society.Google Scholar
Mercelis, J. 2022. ‘“Men Don’t Like to Work under a Woman”: Female Chemists in the Photographic Manufacturing Industry, ca. 1918–1950’. Ambix 69, no. 3: 291–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercier, Alain. 2018. Le Conservatoire des Arts et Métiers: des origines à la fin de la Restauration, 1794–1830. Ghent: Snoeck Publishers.Google Scholar
Mertens, Joost. 2000. ‘From Tubal Cain to Faraday: William Whewell as a Philosopher of Technology’. History of Science 38, no. 3: 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert. 1936. ‘Puritanism, Pietism and Science’. Sociological Review 28, no. 1: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert, and Thackray, Arnold. 1972. ‘On Discipline Building: The Paradoxes of George Sarton’. Isis 63, no. 4: 473–95.Google Scholar
Meyer, Torsten, and Popplow, Marcus. 2004. ‘“To Employ Each of Nature’s Products in the Most Favorable Way Possible”: Nature as a Commodity in Eighteenth-Century German Economic Discourse’. Historical Social Research 29, no. 4: 4–40.Google Scholar
Miller, David Philip. 2004. Discovering Water: James Watt, Henry Cavendish and the Nineteenth-Century ‘Water Controversy’. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Miller, David Philip. 2019. The Life and Legend of James Watt: Collaboration, Natural Philosophy, and the Improvement of the Steam Engine. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Ian. 2014. Reforming Food Production: Agricultural Science and Education. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Steve. 2001. ‘Public Understanding of Science at the Crossroads’. Public Understanding of Science 10, no. 1: 115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, Ian. 2013. ‘Illusionary Order: Online Databases, Optical Character Recognition, and Canadian History, 1997–2010’. Canadian Historical Review 94, no. 4: 540–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Education. 1945. Higher Technological Education: Report of a Special Committee Appointed in April 1944. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Minister of Fuel and Power. 1955. A Programme of Nuclear Power. Cmd 9389. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Ministry of Reconstruction. 1918. Report of the Machinery of Government Committee. Cd 9230. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Ministry of Technology. 1970. Industrial Research and Development in Government Laboratories: A New Organisation for the Seventies. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 2004. Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, D. C. 1965. ‘The Corn Laws and High Farming’. The Economic History Review 18, no. 3: 544–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Olive. 1943. ‘“Vigilantibus non dormientibus”: Whiston A. Bristow’. Scope. Magazine for Industry, July: 23–28.Google Scholar
Morant, Robert. 1910. ‘Prefatory Memorandum’. In Regulations for Technical Schools, Schools of Art and Other Forms of Provision of Further Education in England and Wales. Cd 5329. London: HMSO, 1910, iv–v.Google Scholar
Morant, Robert. 1911. ‘Prefatory Memorandum’. In Statement of Grants Available from the Board of Education in Aid of Technological and Professional Work in Universities in England and Wales. Cd. 5762. London: HMSO, iii–iv.Google Scholar
Morrell, J. B. 1973. ‘The Patronage of Mid-Victorian Science in the University of Edinburgh’. Science Studies 3, no. 4: 353–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrell, J. B., and Thackray, Arnold. 1981. Gentlemen of Science: Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Peter J. T. (ed.). 2010. Science for the Nation: Perspectives on the History of the Science Museum. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, Elizabeth J. 1992. ‘English Civic Universities and the Myth of Decline’. History of Universities 11: 177–204.Google Scholar
Mortimer, James E., and Ellis, Valerie E.. 1980. A Professional Union: The Evolution of the Institution of Professional Civil Servants. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Moseley, Henry. 1843. The Mechanical Principles of Engineering and Architecture. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Moseley, Russell. 1976. ‘Science, Government and Industrial Research: The Origins and Development of the National Physical Laboratory, 1900–1975.’ DPhil thesis, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Moseley, Russell. 1978. ‘The Origins and Early Years of the National Physical Laboratory: A Chapter in the Pre-History of British Science Policy’. Minerva 16, no. 2: 222–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, Russell. 1980. ‘Government Science and the Royal Society: The Control of the National Physical Laboratory in the Inter-War Years’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 35, no. 2: 167–93.Google Scholar
Mosley, S. 2016. ‘Selling the Smokeless City: Advertising Images and Smoke Abatement in Urban-Industrial Britain, circa 1840–1960’. History and Technology 32, no. 2: 201–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moura, Mário Graça. 2017. ‘Schumpeter and the Meanings of Rationality’. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 27, no. 1: 115–38.Google Scholar
Mowery, David. 1986. ‘Industrial Research in Britain, 1900–1950’. In Elbaum, Bernard and Lazonick, William (eds.), Decline of the British Economy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 189–222.Google Scholar
Müller, Ernst, and Schmieder, Falko. 2018. ‘Begriffsgeschichte und Wissenschaftsgeschichte: Bestandsaufnahme und Forschungsperspektiven’. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 44, no. 1: 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Multhauf, Robert P. 1971. ‘The French Crash Program for Saltpeter Production, 1776–94’. Technology and Culture 12, no. 2: 163–81.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kate. 2016. Behind the Wireless: A History of Early Women at the BBC. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, P. W. 1964. ‘The Definition of Technical Education: 1860–1910’. The Vocational Aspect of Secondary and Further Education 16, no. 34: 105–11.Google Scholar
Mussell, James, and Gooday, Graeme. 2020. A Pioneer of Connection: Recovering the Life and Work of Oliver Lodge. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahum, Andrew. 1999. ‘The Royal Aircraft Establishment from 1945 to Concorde’. In Bud, Robert and Gummett, Philip (eds.), Cold War Hot Science: Applied Research in Britain’s Defence Laboratories 1945–1990. Reading: Harwood, 29–58.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. 1967. Applied Science and Technological Progress: A Report to the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. 1989. ‘What Is Private and What Is Public about Technology?’ Science, Technology, & Human Values 14, no. 3: 229–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The New Municipal Technical School’. 1900. Journal of the Manchester Geographical Society 16: 293–95.Google Scholar
Niblett, C. A. 1980. ‘Images of Progress: Three Episodes in the Development of Research Policy in the UK Electrical Engineering Industry’. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Rafaelle M., and Nicholson, John W.. 2012. ‘Martha Whiteley of Imperial College, London: A Pioneering Woman Chemist’. Journal of Chemical Education 89, no. 5: 598–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieto-Galan, Agustí. 2016. Science in the Public Sphere: A History of Lay Knowledge and Expertise. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nobel Industries Limited, 1924. Nobel Industries Limited: A Record of Their Exhibits at the British Empire Exhibition, 1924. London: Nobel Industries Limited.Google Scholar
Norris, John Pilkington. 1869. The Education of the People, Our Weak Points and Our Strength, Occasional Essays. London: Simpkin Marshall.Google Scholar
Nuffield College. 1944. Problems of Scientific and Industrial Research: A Statement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nurse, Paul. 2023. Independent Review of the UK’s Research, Development and Innovation Organisational Landscape: Final Report and Recommendations. Available at www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-development-and-innovation-organisational-landscape-an-independent-review (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Nutting, P. G. 1919. ‘Institutes of Applied Science’. Journal of the Franklin Institute 187, no. 4: 487–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Mary Jo. 2004. Blackett: Physics, War, and Politics in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Mary Jo. 2011. Michael Polanyi and His Generation: Origins of the Social Construction of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of the Minister for Science. 1961. Report of the Committee on the Management and Control of Research and Development. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. 2017. ‘Business Enterprise Research and Development, UK: 2016’. Available at www.ons.gov.uk/economy/governmentpublicsectorandtaxes/researchanddevelopmentexpenditure/bulletins/businessenterpriseresearchanddevelopment/2016 (accessed August 2022).Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. 2019. ‘Gross Domestic Expenditure on Research and Development, UK: 2017’. Available at www.ons.gov.uk/releases/ukgrossdomesticexpenditureonresearchanddevelopment2017 (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. 2022. ‘Comparison of ONS Business Enterprise Research and Development Statistics with HMRC Research and Development Tax Credit Statistics’. Available at www.ons.gov.uk/economy/governmentpublicsectorandtaxes/researchanddevelopmentexpenditure/articles/comparisonofonsbusinessenterpriseresearchanddevelopmentstatisticswithhmrcresearchanddevelopmenttaxcreditstatistics/2022-09-29. (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. 2023. ‘Gross Domestic Product at Market Prices: Current Price: Seasonally Adjusted £m’. Available at www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp/timeseries/ybha/pn2 (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Olby, Robert. 1991. ‘Social Imperialism and State Support for Agricultural Research in Edwardian Britain’. Annals of Science 48, no. 6: 509–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olewski, Todd. 2018. ‘Between Bench and Bedside: Building Clinical Consensus at the NIH, 1977–2013’. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 73, no. 4: 464–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, Théodore. 1850. ‘Monge et l’École polytechnique’. Revue Scientifique et Industrielle 7: 64–68.Google Scholar
Olivier, Théodore. 1851. Mémoires de géométrie descriptive, théorique et appliqué. Paris.Google Scholar
Orlow, Dietrich. 2000. Common Destiny: A Comparative History of the Dutch, French, and German Social Democratic Parties, 1945–1969. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormerod, Henry A. 1953. The Liverpool Royal Institution: A Record and a Retrospect. Liverpool: University Press.Google Scholar
Ormerod, Richard. 2003. ‘The Father of Operational Research’. In Hore, Peter (ed.), Patrick Blackett: Sailor, Scientist and Socialist. London: F. Cass, 187–200.Google Scholar
Ortolano, Guy. 2009. The Two Cultures Controversy: Science, Literature and Cultural Politics in Postwar Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osler, W. 1919. ‘The Old Humanities and the New Science: The Presidential Address Delivered before the Classical Association at Oxford, May, 1919’. BMJ 2, no. 3053: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Sullivan, O. P., Duffy, R. M., and Kelly, B. D.. 2019. ‘Culturomics and the History of Psychiatry: Testing the Google Ngram Method’. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 36, no. 1: 23–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palladino, Paolo. 1990. ‘The Political Economy of Applied Research: Plant Breeding in Great Britain, 1910–1940’. Minerva 28, no. 4: 446–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palladino, Paolo. 1993. ‘Between Craft and Science: Plant Breeding, Mendelian Genetics, and British Universities, 1900–1920’. Technology and Culture 34, no. 2: 300–323.Google Scholar
Parker, Miles. 2016. ‘The Rothschild Report (1971) and the Purpose of Government-Funded R&D: A Personal Account’. Palgrave Communications 2 (2 August). doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parliamentary and Scientific Committee. 1947. Colleges of Technology and Technological Manpower. London: Parliamentary and Scientific Committee.Google Scholar
Pasteur, Louis. 1871. ‘Pourquoi la France n’a pas trouvé d’hommes supérieurs au moment du Péril’. Reprinted in Quelques Réflexions sur la Science en France. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 25–40.Google Scholar
Paterson, C. C. 1945. A Confidential History of the Research Laboratories. London: General Electric.Google Scholar
Paterson, C. C., Smuts, J. C., Crompton, R. E. B., and Jewett, F. B.. 1931. ‘Speeches at the Royal Albert Hall, 23rd September, 1931, at the Opening of the Faraday Exhibition’. Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers 69, no. 419: 1385–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattison, Michael. 1983. ‘Scientists, Inventors and the Military in Britain, 1915–19: The Munitions Inventions Department’. Social Studies of Science 13, no. 4: 521–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavitt, K., and Walker, W.. 1976. ‘Government Policy towards Industrial Innovation: A Review’. Research Policy 5, no. 1: 11–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, George C. 1885. ‘Editor’s Notice’. In Pearson, George C. (ed.), Propaedeia Prophetica or, The Use and Design of the Old Testament Examined by William Rowe Lyall. New ed. London: Kegan Paul Trench, 5–6.Google Scholar
Pechenick, Eitan Adam, Danforth, Christopher M., and Dodds, Peter Sheridan. 2015. ‘Characterizing the Google Books Corpus: Strong Limits to Inferences of Socio-Cultural and Linguistic Evolution’. PLoS One 10, no. 10. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkin, Harold. 1972. ‘University Planning in Britain in the 1960s’. Higher Education 1: 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petch, N. J. 1992. ‘Sir Harold Montague Finniston, 15 August 1912–2 February 1991’. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 38: 131–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petitjean, P., Zharov, V., Glaser, G., Richardson, J., de Padirac, B., and Archibald, G. (eds.). 2006. Sixty Years of Science at UNESCO, 1945–2005. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Phillips, Denise. 2012. Acolytes of Nature: Defining Natural Science in Germany, 1770–1850. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Playfair, Lyon. 1857. On Scientific Institutions in Connexion with the Department of Science and Art Department. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Pocock, Rowland F. 1977. Nuclear Power: Its Development in the United Kingdom. Old Woking: Unwin Brothers.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1956. ‘Pure and Applied Science and Their Appropriate Forms of Organization’. Dialectica 10, no. 3: 231–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Political and Economic Planning, Industries Group. 1936. Report on the British Coal Industry. London: PEP.Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederick. 1957. Automation: A Study of Its Economic and Social Consequences. Trans. W. O. Henderson and W. H. Challoner. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pratt, John. 1997. The Polytechnic Experiment: 1965–1992. Buckingham: Open University Press and SRHE.Google Scholar
Preece, C. 1982. ‘The Durham Engineering Students of 1838’. Transactions of the Architectural and Archaeological Society of Durham and Northumberland n.s. 6: 71–74.Google Scholar
President of the United States. 1964. Economic Report of the President. Transmitted to the Congress January 1964. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Prickett, Stephen. 1979. ‘Coleridge and the Idea of the Clerisy’. In Crawford, Walter B. (ed.), Reading Coleridge: Approaches and Applications. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 252–73.Google Scholar
Pursell, Carroll. 1974. ‘“A Savage Struck by Lightning”: The Idea of a Research Moratorium, 1927–37’. Lex et Scientia 10: 146–58.Google Scholar
Pyenson, Lewis. 2007. The Passion of George Sarton: A Modern Marriage and Its Discipline. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Quayle, J. Rodney, and Greenwood, Geoffrey W.. 2003. ‘Leonard Rotherham CBE. 31 August 1913 – 23 March 2001’. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 49: 431–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord (chairman). 1916. The Neglect of Science: Report of Proceedings at a Conference Held … 3rd May, 1916. London: Harrison & Sons.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1930. Lord Balfour in His Relation to Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reader, W. J. 1970, 1975. Imperial Chemical Industries: A History. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reader, W. J. 1977. ‘Imperial Chemical Industries and the State, 1926–1945’. In Supple, Barry (ed.), Essays in British Business History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977, 227–43.Google Scholar
Reader, W. J. Recueil des lois, décrets, ordonnances … du Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, et à la création des cours publics de cet établissement etc. 1889. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Reeks, Margaret. 1920. Register of the Associates and Old Students of the Royal School of Mines, and History of the Royal School of Mines. London: Royal School of Mines Old Students’ Association.Google Scholar
Reich, Leonard S. 1987. ‘Edison, Coolidge, and Langmuir: Evolving Approaches to American Industrial Research’. The Journal of Economic History 47, no. 2: 341–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Wemyss. 1899. Memoirs and Correspondence of Lyon Playfair, First Lord Playfair of St. Andrews. London: Cassel.Google Scholar
Reingold, Nathan. 1987. ‘Vannevar Bush’s New Deal for Research: Or the Triumph of the Old Order’. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 17, no. 2: 299–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnikoff, Jason 2022. Labor’s End: How the Promise of Automation Degraded Work. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Review of Frank Froest, The Grell Mystery. 1913. The Spectator, no. 4444 (30 August): 22–23.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. A., and Tansey, E. M. (eds.). 2008. Superbugs and Superdrugs: A History of MRSA. London: Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL.Google Scholar
Richter, M. 1986. ‘Conceptual History (Begriffsgeschichte) and Political Theory’. Political Theory 14, no. 4: 604–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Gerrylynn Kuszen. 1973. ‘The Royal College of Chemistry (1845–1853): A Social History of Chemistry in Early-Victorian England.’ PhD thesis, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Roberts, Gerrylynn Kuszen, and Simmons, A. E.. 2009. ‘British Chemists Abroad, 1887–1971: The Dynamics of Chemists’ Careers’. Annals of Science 66, no. 1: 103–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K. O. 1969. ‘The Separation of Secondary Education from Technical Education 1899–1903’. The Vocational Aspect of Education 21: 101–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roderick, Gordon Wynne, and Stephens, Michael Dawson. 1972. Scientific and Technical Education in 19th Century England: A Symposium. Newton Abbot: David and Charles.Google Scholar
Rodrick, Anne B. 2004. Self Help, and Civic Culture: Citizenship in Victorian Birmingham. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Roe, Nicholas. 2002. Samuel Taylor Coleridge and the Sciences of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rolls-Hansen, Niels. 2006. ‘The Lysenko Effect: The Politics of Science’. Journal of the History of Biology 39, no. 1: 202–4.Google Scholar
Rolls-Hansen, Niels. 2015. ‘On the Philosophical Roots of Today’s Science Policy: Any Lessons from the “Lysenko Affair”?’ Studies in East European Thought 67, nos. 1–2: 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, John David. 1980. ‘The Philosophical and Religious Thought of Arthur James Balfour (1848–1930)’. Journal of British Studies 19, no. 2: 120–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenhain, Walter. 1914. Metallurgy: An Introduction to the Study of Physical Metallurgy. New York: D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Rosenhain, Walter. 1915–16. ‘The National Physical Laboratory: Its Work and Aims’. Journal of the West Scotland Iron & Steel Institute 23: 213–63.Google Scholar
Rosenhain, Walter. 1930. ‘The Development of Materials for Aircraft Purposes’. Proceedings of the Royal Aeronautical Society 34, no. 236: 631–48.Google Scholar
Ross, S. 1962. ‘Scientist: The Story of a Word’. Annals of Science 18, no. 2: 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, William. 2002. H. G. Wells’s World Reborn: The Outline of History and Its Companions. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press.Google Scholar
Rotherham, L., and Mcintosh, A. B.. 1956. ‘Applied Research and Development within the Industrial Group of the U.K. Atomic Energy Authority’. Nature 178, no. 4532: 524–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Victor (Lord). 1972. ‘Forty-Five Varieties of Research (and Development)’. Nature 239, no. 5372: 373–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothwell, Roy. 1992. ‘Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s’. R&D Management 22, no. 3: 221–39.Google Scholar
Rowland, H. A. 1886. ‘Address of Professor Rowland’. In Report of the Electrical Conference at Philadelphia in September 1884. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 12–28.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on the Coal Industry. 1926. Report of the Royal Commission on the Coal Industry (1925) with Minutes of Evidence and Appendices. Cmd 2600. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Secondary Education. 1895. Minutes of Evidence Taken before the Royal Commission on Secondary Education. Vol II. c-7862-1. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Technical Instruction. 1884. Second Report of the Royal Commission on Technical Instruction, vols. 1–4. c. 3981. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Royal Society, British Empire Exhibition Committee. 1924. British Empire Exhibition 1924: Handbook to the Exhibition of Pure Science: Galleries 3 and 4 British Government Pavilion. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
Royal Society, British Empire Exhibition Committee. 1925. Phases of Modern Science. London: A. and F. Denny.Google Scholar
Rubin, Charles T. 2005. ‘Daedalus and Icarus Revisited’. The New Atlantis, no. 8, Spring: 73–91.Google Scholar
Rushforth, Alexander. 2012. ‘Translational Science: The Very Idea. Transformations in Contemporary Academic Health Research?’ PhD thesis, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Russell, A. S. 1933. ‘Science Notes: An Engineer’s Outlook’. The Listener 10, no. 240 (16 August): 252.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1924. Icarus; or, The Future of Science. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1928. ‘Science’. In Beard, C. A. (ed.), Whither Mankind? A Panorama of Modern Civilization. New York: Longmans Green, 63–82.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1956. ‘Science and Human Life’. In Newman, J. R. (ed.), What Is Science? Twelve Eminent Scientists and Philosophers Explain Their Various Fields to the Layman. London: Victor Gollancz, 6–23.Google Scholar
Russell, E. J. 1919. ‘The Development of Agricultural Research and Education in Great Britain’. Nature 103, no. 2586: 227–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Peter (pseud. for John Maynard Smith). 1962. ‘The Social Control of Science’. New Left Review 1, no. 16: 10–20.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, David (Lord). 2005. The Race to the Top: A Review of Government’s Science and Innovation Policies Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Michael. 1972. The Universities and British Industry, 1850–1970. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Michael. 1978. ‘The Professor as Industrial Consultant: Oliver Arnold and the British Steel Industry, 1900–14’. The Economic History Review 31, no. 4: 585–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, R. S. 1950. ‘The Springs of Technical Progress in Britain, 1919–39’. Economic Journal 60: 275–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 1992. ‘Late Victorian Metrology and Its Instrumentation: A Manufactory of Ohms’. In Bud, Robert and Cozzens, Susan E. (eds.), Invisible Connections: Instruments, Institutions, and Science. Bellingham, WA: SPIE, 23–56.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 2019. ‘Ideas Embodied in Metal: Babbage’s Engines Dismembered and Remembered’. In Nall, Joshua, Taub, Liba, and Willmoth, Francis (eds.), The Whipple Museum of the History of Science: Objects and Investigations, to Celebrate the 75th Anniversary of R. S. Whipple’s Gift to the University of Cambridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 119–58.Google Scholar
Schatzberg, Eric. 2006. ‘Technik Comes to America: Changing Meanings of Technology before 1930’. Technology and Culture 47, no. 3: 486–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzberg, Eric. 2018. Technology: Critical History of a Concept. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauz, Désirée. 2020. Nützlichkeit und Erkenntnisfortschritt: Eine Geschichte des modernen Wissenschaftsverständnisses. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Schefold, Bertram. 2004. ‘Edgar Salin and His Concept of “Anschauliche Theorie” (“Intuitive Theory”) during the Interwar Period’. Annals of the Society for the History of Economic Thought 46: 1–16.Google Scholar
Scheinfeldt, Tom. 2003. ‘Sites of Salvage: Science History between the Wars’. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Schleifer, Ronald. 2000. Modernism and Time: The Logic of Abundance in Literature, Science, and Culture, 1880–1930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, C. C. E. 1810. Allgemeine Encyklopädie und Methodologie der Wissenschaften. Jena: Akad. Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Schmoch, Ulrich. 2007. ‘Double-Boom Cycles and the Comeback of Science-Push and Market-Pull’. Research Policy 36, no. 7: 1000–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schools Inquiry Commission. 1867. Report Relative to Technical Education. [3898]. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1928. ‘The Instability of Capitalism’. Economic Journal 38: 361–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, Geoffrey Russell. 1971. The Quest for National Efficiency: A Study in British Politics and Political Thought, 1899–1914. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle, John, 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebag-Montefiore, Ruth. 1994–96. ‘A Quest for a Grandfather: Sir Philip Magnus, 1st Bart., Victorian Educationalist’. Jewish Historical Studies 34: 141–59.Google Scholar
Sebestik, J. 1983. ‘The Rise of the Technological Science’. History and Technology 1, no. 1: 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebestik, J. 1984. ‘De la technologie à la technonomie: Gerard-Joseph Christian’. Cahiers STS 2: 56–69.Google Scholar
Sebestik, J. 1986. ‘The Introduction of Technological Education at the Conservatoire des Arts et Métiers’. In Kranzberg, Melvin (ed.), Technological Education –Technological Style. San Francisco: San Francisco Press, 26–40.Google Scholar
Secretary of State for the Colonies. 1925. Report of the East Africa Commission. Cmd 2387. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Select Committee. 1867–68. ‘On the Provisions for Giving Instruction in Theoretical and Applied Science to the Industrial Classes’. P.P. 1867–68 (432) XV.1.Google Scholar
Self, Robert. 1994. ‘Treasury Control and the Empire Marketing Board: The Rise and Fall of Non-Tariff Preference in Britain, 1924–1933’. Twentieth Century British History 5, no. 2: 153–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seppel, Marten, and Tribe, Keith (eds.). 2017. Cameralism in Practice. Martlesham: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Seth, Suman. 2009. ‘Putting Knowledge in Its Place: Science, Colonialism, and the Postcolonial’. Postcolonial Studies 12, no. 4: 373–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seward, A. C. 1917. ‘Preface’. In Seward, A. C. (ed.), Science and the Nation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, v–vii.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H., Jr. 2005. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, James. 1996. ‘Brave New World and the Rationalization of Industry’. In Meckier, Jerome (ed.), Critical Essays on Aldous Huxley. New York: Hall, 88–102.Google Scholar
Seymour-Ure, Colin. 1975. ‘The Press and the Party System between the Wars’. In Peale, Gillian and Cooke, Chris (eds.), The Politics of Reappraisal 1918–1939. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 232–57.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 2010. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Fred R. 1985. ‘Neologisms in Coleridge’s Notebooks’. Notes and Queries 32, no. 3: 346–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharot, Stephen. 1979. ‘Reform and Liberal Judaism in London: 1840–1940’. Jewish Social Studies 41, nos. 3–4: 211–28.Google Scholar
Sharp, Paul Richard. 1971. ‘“Whiskey Money” and the Development of Technical and Secondary Education in the 1890s’. Journal of Educational Administration and History 4, no. 1: 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Robert. 2003. ‘Oswald Silberrad: The Work of a Forgotten Chemist’. Ambix 50, no. 3: 302–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelley, Mary. 2017. Frankenstein. Ed. Guston, David H., Finn, Ed, and Scott Robert, Jason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, Deri. 2017. ‘Robert Le Rossignol, 1884–1976: Engineer of the “Haber” Process’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 71, no. 3: 263–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, F. H. W. (ed.). 1975. Survey of London, vol. 38: South Kensington Museums Area. London: London County Council.Google Scholar
Sherington, G. E. 1974. ‘R. B. Haldane, The Reconstruction Committee and the Board of Education, 1916–18’. Journal of Educational Administration and History 6, no. 2: 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, C. W., and Isenson, R. S.. 1967. ‘Project Hindsight’. Science n.s. 156, no. 3782: 1571–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiach, Morag. 2018. ‘Woolf’s Atom, Eliot’s Catalyst and Richardson’s Waves of Light: Science and Modernism in 1919’. In Bud, Robert, Greenhalgh, Paul, James, Frank, and Shiach, Morag (eds.), Being Modern: The Cultural Impact of Science in the Early Twentieth Century. London: UCL Press, 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shils, Edward. 1956. The Torment of Secrecy: The Background and Consequences of American Security Policies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Shinn, C. H. 1980. ‘The Beginnings of the University Grants Committee’. History of Education 9, no. 3: 233–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinn, C. H. 1986. Paying the Piper: The Development of the University Grants Committee 1919–1946. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Short, P. J. 1974. ‘The Municipal School of Technology and the University, 1890–1914’. In Cardwell, D. S. L. (ed.), Artisan to Graduate: Essays to Commemorate the Foundation in 1824 of the Manchester Mechanics’ Institution, Now in 1974 the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 157–64.Google Scholar
Siemens, Sir Charles William. 1889. ‘Remarks on the House of Applied Science’. Presented to the Iron and Steel Institute, 1877. In Bamber, E. F. (ed.), The Scientific Works of C. William Siemens. Vol. 3. London: John Murray, 154–55.Google Scholar
Simcock, A. V. 1985. Robert T. Gunther and the Old Ashmolean. Oxford: Museum of the History of Science.Google Scholar
Simon, Francis Eugene. 1960. The Neglect of Science: Essays Addressed to Laymen. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. First published 1951.Google Scholar
Singer, Charles. 1960. ‘How “A History of Technology” Came into Being’. Technology and Culture 1, no. 4: 302–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelton, Matthew. 2001. ‘The Paratext of Everything: Constructing and Marketing H. G. Wells’s The Outline of History’. Book History 4, no. 1: 237–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slosson, Edwin E. 1928. ‘The Coming of the New Coal Age’. In Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 1927. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 243–53.Google Scholar
Smalley, George W. 1909. The Life of Sir Sydney H. Waterlow, Bart., London Apprentice, Lord Mayor, Captain of Industry, and Philanthropist. London: E. Arnold.Google Scholar
Smeaton, W. A. 1997. ‘History of Science at University College London’. British Journal for the History of Science 30, no. 1: 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Crosbie. 1998. The Science of Energy: A Cultural History of Energy Physics in Victorian Britain. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Snelders, H. A. M. 1981. ‘James F. W. Johnston’s Influence on Agricultural Chemistry in the Netherlands’. Annals of Science 38, no. 5: 571–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. P. 1936. ‘What We Need from Applied Science’. The Spectator, no. 5656 (20 November): 904.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. 1993. The Two Cultures. With Introduction by Stefan Collini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Alice D. (ed.). 1934. S. T. Coleridge’s Treatise on Method: As Published in the Encyclopaedia Metropolitana. London: Constable & Co.Google Scholar
Snyder, Alice D. 1940. ‘Coleridge and the Encyclopedists’. Modern Philology 38: 173–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soddy, Frederick. 1920. ‘Applied Science and Industrial Research’. Nature 105, no. 2640: 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soloway, Richard A. 1995. Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth-Century Britain. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Soubiran, Sébastien. 2002. ‘De l’utilisation contingente des scientifiques dans les systèmes d’innovation des marine française et britannique entre les deux guerres mondiales. Deux exemples: la conduite du tir des navires et la télémécanique’. PhD thesis, Université de Paris 7, Denis Diderot.Google Scholar
Staley, Richard. 2018. ‘The Interwar Period as a Machine Age: Mechanics, the Machine, Mechanisms, and the Market in Discourse’. Science in Context 31, no. 3: 263–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staudenmaier, John M. 1985. Technology’s Storytellers: Reweaving the Human Fabric. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stead, H. 1976. ‘The Costs of Technological Innovation’. Research Policy 5, no. 1: 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Helmuth (ed.). 1989. J. D. Bernal’s The Social Function of Science, 1939–1989. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Stewart, W. 1989. Higher Education in Post-War Great Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, D. E. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Stranges, Anthony N. 1985. ‘From Birmingham to Billingham: High-Pressure Coal Hydrogenation in Great Britain’. Technology and Culture 26, no. 4: 726–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Joseph T. 2008. ‘The Question of Human Progress in Britain after the Great War’. British Scholar 1, no. 1: 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturchio, Jeffrey. 2020. ‘Experimenting with Research: Kenneth Mees, Eastman Kodak and the Challenges of Diversification’. Science Museum Group Journal, 13 (Spring). http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/201311 (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Sumner, James. 2014. ‘Defiance to Compliance: Visions of the Computer in Postwar Britain’. History and Technology 30, no. 4: 309–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, James. 2015. Brewing Science, Technology and Print, 1700–1880. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swade, Doron. 2000. The Cogwheel Brain: Charles Babbage and the Quest to Build the First Computer. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Swiatecka, M. Jagdiga. 1980. Idea of the Symbol: Some Nineteenth Century Comparisons with Coleridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swinney, Geoffrey N. 2016. ‘George Wilson’s Map of Technology: Giving Shape to the “Industrial Arts” in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Edinburgh’. Journal of Scottish Historical Studies 36, no. 2: 165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, F. H. 1913. ‘Military Aviation’. The Journal of the Aeronautical Society 17, no. 67: 127–39.Google Scholar
Tansey, E. M. 1989. ‘The Wellcome Physiological Research Laboratories 1894–1904: The Home Office, Pharmaceutical Firms, and Animal Experiments’. Medical History 33, no. 1: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tansey, E. M. 1990. ‘The Early Scientific Career of Sir Henry Dale FRS (1875–1968)’. PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Tawney, R. H. 1943. ‘The Abolition of Economic Controls, 1918–1921’. Economic History Review 13, nos. 1–2: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Technical Instruction Act. 1889. c.76. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Thackray, Arnold. 1974. ‘Natural Knowledge in Cultural Context: The Manchester Model’. American Historical Review 79, no. 3: 672–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thackray, Arnold, Sturchio, Jeffrey, Carroll, P. Thomas, and Bud, Robert. 1985. Chemistry in America, 1876–1976: Historical Indicators. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
‘Things to Come’. 1937. The Economist (11 September): 511.Google Scholar
Thomas, Edward. 1936. ‘Computing Progress in Chemistry’. Science n.s. 83, no. 2146: 159–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, Mark. 1983. ‘Rearmament and Economic Recovery in the Late 1930s’. Economic History Review 36, no. 4: 552–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, F. M. L. (ed.). 1993. The Cambridge Social History of Britain 1750–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Joseph. 1886. The Owens College: Its Foundation and Growth; and Its Connection with the Victoria University. Manchester: Cornish.Google Scholar
Thompson, Peter. 2022. ‘From Gas Hysteria to Nuclear Fear: A Historical Synthesis of Chemical and Atomic Weapons’. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 52, no. 2: 223–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. Landsborough. 1973. ‘Origin of the British Legislative Provision for Medical Research’. Journal of Social Policy 2, no. 1: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J. J. 1917. ‘Address of the President, Sir J. J. Thomson, O.M., at the Anniversary Meeting, November 30, 1916’. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A 93, no. 647: 90–98.Google Scholar
Thorsheim, P. 2017. Inventing Pollution: Coal, Smoke, and Culture in Britain since 1800. 2nd ed. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, R. H. 1902. ‘Scientific Research: The Art of Revelation and of Prophecy’. Science n.s.16, no. 402: 401–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Tilley, Helen. 2011. Africa as a Living Laboratory: Empire, Development, and the Problem of Scientific Knowledge, 1870–1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titley, Arthur. 1920. ‘Presidential Address’. Transactions of the Newcomen Society 1, no. 1: 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titley, Arthur. 1941. ‘Beginnings of the Society: A Note on the Attainment of Its Majority’. Transactions of the Newcomen Society 22, no. 1: 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tizard, H. T. 1929. ‘Science and the New Industrial Revolution’. Journal of the Textile Institute Proceedings 20 (April): 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, Jim. 1994. Government and the Enterprise since 1900: The Changing Problem of Efficiency. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, Jim. 2000. The Politics of Decline: Understanding Post-War Britain. Harlow: Longmans.Google Scholar
Tout, T. F. 1915. ‘The University’. In McKechnie, H. M. (ed.), Manchester in 1915. Manchester: Manchester University Press/Longman, 38–50.Google Scholar
Travis, Anthony S. 2006. ‘Decadence, Decline and Celebration: Raphael Meldola and the Mauve Jubilee of 1906’. History and Technology 22, no. 2: 131–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Anthony S. 2013. ‘Modernising Industrial Organic Chemistry’. In Travis, Anthony S., Schröter, Harm G., Homburg, Ernst, and Morris, Peter J. T. (eds.), Determinants in the Evolution of the European Chemical Industry, 1900–1939: New Technologies, Political Frameworks, Markets and Companies. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, 171–98.Google Scholar
Trentmann, Frank. 2008. Free Trade Nation: Commerce, Consumption, and Civil Society in Modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trischler, Helmuth, and Bud, Robert. 2018. ‘Public Technology: Nuclear Energy in Europe’. History and Technology 34, nos. 3–4: 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trischler, Helmuth, and Vom Bruch, Rüdiger. 1999. Forschung für den Markt: Geschichte der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Tully, James (ed.). 1989. Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Turchetti, Simone. 2012. The Pontecorvo Affair: A Cold War Defection and Nuclear Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Dorothy Mabel. 1933. The Book of Scientific Discovery: How Science Has Enabled Human Welfare. London: G. G. Harrap & Co.Google Scholar
Turney, Jon. 1998. Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyndall, John. 1873. Six Lectures on Light, Delivered in America in 1872–1873. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Uekötter, F. 2021. ‘The Revolt of the Chemists: Biofuels, Agricultural Overproduction, and the Chemurgy Movement in New Deal America’. History and Technology 37, no. 4: 429–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Congress, Joint Economic Committee. 1956. Automation and Technological Change, United States. Congress, Senate, Eighty-Fourth Congress, Second Session. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States Congress, Subcommittee on Economic Stabilization of the Joint Committee on the Economic Report. 1955. Automation and Technological Change. Hearings. October 14, 15, 17, 18, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28, Eighty-Fourth Congress, First Session. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States Department of Commerce. 1967. Technological Innovation: Its Environment and Management. Report of the Panel on Invention and Innovation. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
United States House of Representatives, Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations. 1958. Research and Development. Hearing. 15 January. Eighty-Fifth Congress, Second Session. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States National Science Foundation. 1980. Categories of Scientific Research. Papers Presented at a National Science Foundation Seminar, Washington, DC, December 8, 1979. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
University Grants Committee. 1921. Report of the University Grants Committee. 3 February. Cmd 1163. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
University Grants Committee. 1953. University Development. Report on the Years 1947 to 1952. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Valone, David A. 2001. ‘Hugh James Rose’s Anglican Critique of Cambridge: Science, Antirationalism, and Coleridgean Idealism in Late Georgian England’. Albion 33, no. 2: 218–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Kloot, William. 2005. ‘Lawrence Bragg’s Role in the Development of Sound-Ranging in World War I’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 59, no. 3: 273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2013. ‘Ideology and Discourse’. In Freeden, Michael, Tower Sargent, Lyman, and Stears, Marc (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 191–212.Google Scholar
Van Miert, Dirk. 2017. ‘Structuring the History of Knowledge in an Age of Transition: The Göttingen Geschichte between Historia Literaria and the Rise of the Disciplines’. History of Humanities 2, no. 2: 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varcoe, Ian. 1970. ‘Scientists, Government and Organised Research in Great Britain 1914–16: The Early History of the DSIR’. Minerva 8, no. 2: 192–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varcoe, Ian. 1981. ‘Co-operative Research Associations in British Industry, 1918–34’. Minerva 19, no. 3: 433–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varley, E. A. 2002. The Last of the Prince Bishops: William Van Mildert and the High Church Movement of the Early Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vatin, François. 2004. ‘Machinisme, Marxisme, Humanisme: Georges Friedmann avant et après-guerre’. Sociologie du Travail 46, no. 2: 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1906. ‘The Place of Science in Modern Civilization’. American Journal of Sociology, 11, no. 5: 585–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, Keith. 1994. ‘Microbes at Work: Micro-Organisms, the D.S.I.R. and Industry in Britain, 1900–1936’. Annals of Science 51, no. 6: 593–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernon, Keith. 1997. ‘Science for the Farmer? Agricultural Research in England 1909–36’. Twentieth Century British History 8, no. 3: 310–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, Keith. 2004. Universities and the State in England, 1850–1939. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, Keith. 2009. ‘Civic Universities and Community Engagement in Inter-War England’. In Cunningham, Peter with Oosthuizen, Susan and Taylor, Richard (eds.), Beyond the Lecture Hall: Universities and Community Engagement from the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education, 31–48.Google Scholar
Vickers, Neil. 2004. Coleridge and the Doctors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viklund, Daniel. 1955. ‘The Automatic Factory: What Does It Mean?’ Institution of Production Engineers Journal 34, no. 12: 817–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkov, Shulamit. 2012. Walther Rathenau: The Life of Weimar’s Fallen Statesman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, Andre. 2009. The Disordered Police State: German Cameralism as Science and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, James Jackson. 1998. ‘Postgraduate Technological Education in Britain: Events Leading to the Establishment of Churchill College, Cambridge, 1950–1958’. Minerva 36, no. 2: 147–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Vivien. 1984. ‘Invention and Innovation in the Chemical Industry: Demand-Pull or Discovery-Push?’ Research Policy 13, no. 4: 211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, Gerald (ed.). 1966. A Technological University: An Experiment in Bath. Bristol: Bath University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Jacob. 2018. ‘Information and Control: Inventing the Communications Revolution in Post-War Britain’. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Waters, D. W. 1980. ‘Seamen, Scientists, Historians, and Strategy: Presidential Address, 1978’. British Journal for the History of Science 13, no. 3: 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weart, Spencer R. 1988. Nuclear Fear: A History of Images. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney. 1901. Twentieth Century Politics: A Policy of National Efficiency. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
Weedon, Brenda. 2008. The Education of the Eye: History of the Royal Polytechnic Institution 1838–1881. London: University of Westminster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidlein, Edward R., and Hamor, William A.. 1936. Glances at Industrial Research, during Walks and Talks in Mellon Institute. New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Weiss, John Hubbel. 1982. The Making of Technological Man: The Social Origins of French Engineering Education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wellerstein, Alex. 2021. Restricted Data: The History of Nuclear Secrecy in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellmon, Chad. 2015. Organizing Enlightenment: Information Overload and the Invention of the Modern Research University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, H. G. 1920. The Outline of History; Being a Plain History of Life and Mankind. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. 1932. The Work, Wealth and Happiness of Mankind. 2nd ed. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Werner, P., and Holmes, F. L. 2002. ‘Justus Liebig and the Plant Physiologists’. Journal of the History of Biology 35, no. 3: 421–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werskey, Gary. 1978. The Visible College: A Collective Biography of British Scientists and Socialists of the 1930s. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Westman, Robert S. 2011. The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1926. Science and the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Thomas P. 1978. ‘Before and after the Rothschild Report’. In McLachlan, Gordon (ed.), Five Years After: A Review of Health Care Research Management after Rothschild. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 9–50.Google Scholar
Whitfield, Jakob. 2013. ‘Metropolitan Vickers, the GasTurbine, and the State: A Socio-Technical History, 1935-1960’. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert. 1950. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert. 1965. Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and Machine. First published 1948. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Willetts, David. 2019. The Road to 2.4%: Transforming Britain’s R&D Performance. London: Policy Institute, King’s College London.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1976. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Abingdon: CroomHelm.Google Scholar
Williams, Roger. 1973. ‘Some Political Aspects of the Rothschild Affair’. Science Studies 3, no. 1: 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Roger. 1983. ‘British Nuclear Power Policies’. In Tempest, P. (ed.), Energy Economics in Britain. Dordrecht: Springer, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, A. W. 1870. Plea for Pure Science: Being the Inaugural Lecture at the Opening of the Faculty of Science in University College, London, October 4, 1870. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. W. 1920a. ‘Applied Science and Industrial Research’. Nature 105, no. 2639: 387–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. W. 1920b. ‘Applied Science and Industrial Research’. Nature 105, no. 2643: 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, Kirk. 1995. ‘The Origins of British Nuclear Culture, 1895–1939’. Journal of British Studies 34, no. 1: 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Daniel. 2010. ‘Machine Past, Machine Future: Technology in British Thought, c. 1870–1914’. PhD thesis, Birkbeck, University of London.Google Scholar
Wilson, George. 1855. What Is Technology? An Inaugural Lecture. Edinburgh: Sutherland and Knox.Google Scholar
Wilson, Harold. 1963. ‘Labour and the Scientific Revolution’. In The Labour Party. Report of the Sixty-Second Annual Conference. London: Labour Party, 133–40.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jessie A. 1860. Memoir of George Wilson. Edinburgh: Edmonston and Douglas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, George. 1985. Willis R. Whitney, General Electric, and the Origins of U.S. Industrial Research. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wisnioski, Matthew H. 2012. Engineers for Change: Competing Visions of Technology in 1960s America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Audra J. 2018. Freedom’s Laboratory: The Cold War Struggle for the Soul of Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolffe, John. 1994. God and Greater Britain: Religion and National Life in Britain and Ireland, 1843–1945. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wood, A. B. 1965. ‘From Board of Invention to Royal Naval Scientific Service’. Journal of the Royal Naval Scientific Service 20, no. 4: 201–81.Google Scholar
Woolf, Steven H. 2008. ‘The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters’. JAMA 299. no. 2: 211–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worboys, Michael. 1979. ‘Science and British Colonial Imperialism’. PhD thesis, Sussex University.Google Scholar
Worboys, Michael. 1990. ‘The Imperial Institute, the State and the Development of the Natural Resources of the Colonial Empire, 1887–1923’. In McKenzie, John (ed.), Imperialism and the Natural World. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 164–86.Google Scholar
Worboys, Michael. 1996. ‘British Colonial Science Policy 1918–1939’. In Petitjean, Patrick (ed.), Les sciences coloniales: figures et institutions/Colonial Sciences: Researchers and Institutions. Paris: Orstom, 99–111.Google Scholar
Wynne, Bryan. 1992. ‘Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and the Public Uptake of Science’. Public Understanding of Science 1, no. 3: 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yavetz, Ido. 1993. ‘Oliver Heaviside and the Significance of the British Electrical Debate’. Annals of Science 50, no. 2: 135–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yavetz, Ido. 1994. ‘A Victorian Thunderstorm: Lightning Protection and Technological Pessimism in the Nineteenth Century’. In Ezrahi, Yaron, Mendelsohn, Everett, and Segal, Howard P. (eds.), Technology, Pessimism, and Postmodernism. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, Richard. 1985. ‘An Idol of the Marketplace: Baconianism in Nineteenth-Century Britain’. History of Science 23, no. 3: 251–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeo, Richard. 2001. Encyclopaedic Visions: Scientific Dictionaries and Enlightenment Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2008. ‘Re-Forming Skills in British Engineering, 1900–40: A Contingent Failure’. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations 25–26, no. 1: 19–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheludev, I. S., and Konstantinov, L. V.. 1980. ‘Nuclear Power in the USSR’. IAEA Bulletin 22, no. 2: 34–45.Google Scholar
Ziman, John. 1968. Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ziman, John. 1994. Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Solly. 1966. Scientists and War: The Impact of Science on Military and Civil Affairs. London: H. Hamilton.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Solly. 1978. From Apes to Warlords: The Autobiography (1904–1946) of Solly Zuckerman. London: Hamilton.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Solly. 1988. Monkeys, Men, and Missiles: An Autobiography, 1946–1988. London: Collins.Google Scholar