Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:12:21.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

Barbara M. Sattler
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Ursula Coope
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anjum, R. L. and Mumford, S. 2018. What Tends to Be: The Philosophy of Dispositional Modality. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1999. Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 2017. Virtue and Law in Plato and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1973. ‘Causality and Determination’, pp. 6381 in Sosa, E. (ed.), Causation and Conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. M. 2004. ‘After the Ascent: Plato on Becoming Like God’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 171–83.Google Scholar
Aufderheide, J. 2020. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics Book x. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, S. H. 2015. ‘The Concept of Ergon: Towards an Achievement Interpretation of Aristotle’s “Function Argument”’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48: 227–66.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, M. 2017. Plato’s Pragmatic Project: A Reading of Plato’s Laws. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Bobonich, C. 2002. Plato’s Utopia Recast: His Later Ethics and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. 2014. ‘Choice and Moral Responsibility in Nicomachean Ethics iii 1–5’, pp. 81109 in Polansky, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 1991. Ethics with Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2001. ‘Theodicy and Pseudo-History in the Timaeus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 21: 128.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2007a. ‘On the Idea of the Summum Bonum’, pp. 135–52 in Aristotle and Beyond: Essays on Metaphysics and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2007b. ‘Nature and Craft in Aristotelian Teleology’, pp. 85100 in Aristotle and Beyond: Essays on Metaphysics and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (First published as ‘Nature, Craft and Phronesis in Aristotle’, Philosophical Topics 15 (1987): 35–50.)Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2011. Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. and Rowe, C. J. 2002. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (ed.) 2009. The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. D. Ross, new edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buddensiek, F. 2012. ‘Does Good Fortune Matter? Eudemian Ethics viii.2 on Eutuchia’, pp. 155–84 in Leigh, F. (ed.), The Eudemian Ethics on the Voluntary, Friendship, and Luck [the sixth S. V. Keeling Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy] = Philosophia Antiqua 132. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Burnet, J. (ed.) 18991907. Platonis Opera, 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1997. ‘First Words: A Valedictory Lecture’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 43: 120.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2012. ‘The Passion of Reason in Plato’s Phaedrus’, pp. 238–58 in Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bywater, I. (ed.) 1894. Ethica Nicomachea. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Caluori, D. 2011. ‘Reason and Necessity: The Descent of the Philosopher Kings’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40: 727.Google Scholar
Carone, G. R. 2005. Plato’s Cosmology and its Ethical Dimensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2011. ‘Desire in Action: Aristotle’s Move’, pp. 7594 in Pakaluk, M. and Pearson, G. (eds.), Moral Psychology and Human Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2015. ‘Aristotle’s Processes’, pp. 186205 in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, W. (2020) ‘Aristotle and Eudoxus on the Argument from Contraries’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 102: 588612.Google Scholar
Connell, S. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coope, U. 2005. ‘Aristotle’s Account of Agency in Physics iii 3’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 20: 201–21.Google Scholar
Coope, U. 2007. ‘Aristotle on Action’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 81: 109–38.Google Scholar
Coope, U. 2015. ‘Self-Motion as Other-Motion in Aristotle’s Physics’, pp. 245–64 in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coope, U. 2021. ‘Aristotle on Productive Understanding and Completeness’, pp. 109–30 in Johansen, T. K. (ed.), Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy: The Concept of Technē. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1996. ‘An Aristotelian Theory of the Emotions’, pp. 238–57 in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (ed.) 1997. Plato Complete Works. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 2013. Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1997. Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Crisp, R. 2003. ‘Socrates and Aristotle on Happiness and Virtue’, pp. 5578 in Heinaman, R. (ed.), Plato and Aristotle’s Ethics. London: UCL/Ashgate.Google Scholar
Curd, P. and Graham, D. W. (eds.) 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. 1950. The Greek Particles, 2nd ed., revised by Dover, K. J.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. 1952. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 6th ed. revised by Kranz, W., 3 vols. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1993. Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1996. The Middle Platonists, 80 B.C. to A.D. 220, 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dow, J. 2009. ‘Feeling Fantastic? Emotions and Appearances in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 37: 143–75.Google Scholar
Dow, J. 2011. ‘Aristotle’s Theory of the Emotions – Emotions as Pleasures and Pains’, pp. 4774 in Pakaluk, M. and Pearson, G. (eds.), Moral Psychology and Human Action in Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dow, J. 2014. ‘Feeling Fantastic Again: Passions, Appearances and Beliefs in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 46: 213–51.Google Scholar
Dow, J. 2015. Passions and Persuasion in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Echeñique, J. 2012. Aristotle’s Ethics and Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, M. 1974. ‘Xenophanes’ Proposed Reform of Greek Religion’, Hermes 102: 142–50.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. 2017. Plotinus. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Everson, S. 1990. ‘Aristotle’s Compatibilism in the Nicomachean Ethics’, Ancient Philosophy 10: 81103.Google Scholar
Fantino, E., Muss, U., Schubert, C., and Sier, K. (eds.) 2017. Heraklit im Kontext, Studia Praesocratica 8, Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 1987. Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, G. 2003. Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. 1971. ‘Aristotle: Animals, Emotion and Moral Virtue’, Arethusa 4: 137–65.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. 2002. Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology, Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics and Ethics, 2nd ed. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. G. 1971. ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’, The Journal of Philosophy 68.1: 520.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1996. ‘Rationality and Concepts in the Timaeus’, pp. 2958 in Frede, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), Rationality in Greek Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1997. Platon Philebos, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 2010. ‘Puppets on Strings: Moral Psychology in Laws Books 1 and 2’, pp. 108–26 in Bobonich, C. (ed.), Plato’s Laws: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 2014. ‘A Swarm of Virtues: On the Unity and Completeness of Aristotle’s Scheme of Character-Virtues’, pp. 83103 in Lee, M. (ed.), Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 2019. ‘The Deficiency of Human Nature: The Task of a “Philosophy of Human Affairs”’, pp. 258–74 in Keil, G. and Kreft, N. (eds.), Aristotle’s Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fronterotta, F. 2018. ‘Eudoxe et Speusippe sur le plaisir (selon Aristote): un débat dans l’ancienne Académie’, Revue de philosophie ancienne 36.1: 3972.Google Scholar
Gelber, J. 2015. ‘Aristotle on Essence and Habitat’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48: 267–93.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. 1990. ‘Etica Aristotelica e etica Socratica’, pp. 303–26 in Alberti, A. (ed.), Studi sull’ etica di Aristotele. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Gill, C., 2003. ‘The Laws – Is It a Real Dialogue?’, pp. 42–7 in Scolnicov, S. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Plato’s Laws: From Theory into Practice. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Giovannini, A. 1985. ‘Peut-on démythifier l’Atlantide?’, Museum Helveticum 42: 151–56.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. 1975. Philebus: Translated with Notes and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W. 1982. The Greeks on Pleasure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Daniel W. 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy, 2. vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Granger, H. 1993. ‘Aristotle on the Analogy between Action and Nature, Classical Quarterly 43: 168–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, H. 2013. ‘Xenophanes’ Positive Theology and His Criticism of Greek Popular Religion’, Ancient Philosophy 33: 235-271.Google Scholar
Graver, M. and Long, A. A. (trans.) 2015. Seneca: Letters on Ethics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, V. J. 2007. Xenophon on Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grönroos, G. 2007. ‘Listening to Reason in Aristotle’s Moral Psychology’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32: 251–71.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971. Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. 1952. Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2014. ‘Efficient Causation in the Stoic Tradition’, pp. 5482 in Schmaltz, T. (ed.), Efficient Causation: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, K. 2017. The Fate of Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2004. ‘The Philebus on Pleasure: The Good, the Bad and the False’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 104: 111–28.Google Scholar
Harvey, G. 2020. ‘The Cosmic Purpose of Natural Disasters in Plato’s Laws’, Ancient Philosophy 40.1: 157–77.Google Scholar
Heath, M. 2008. ‘Aristotle on Natural Slavery’, Phronesis, 53.3: 243–70.Google Scholar
Heinimann, F. 1945. Nomos und Physis: Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts. Basel: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2014. ‘The Birds and the Bees: Aristotle on the Biological Concept of ἀνάλογον’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 29.1: 145–69.Google Scholar
Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.) 2015. Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hölscher, U. 1993. ‘Paradox, Simile, and Gnomic Utterance in Heraclitus’, pp. 229–38 in Mourelatos, A. (ed.), The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, 2nd ed. with editor’s supplement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. and Hasper, P. S. (eds.) 2016. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 19 [volume on Ancient Epistemology]. Münster: Mentis.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2005. Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1995. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1960. ‘Praise of Law: The Origin of Legal Philosophy and the Greeks’, pp. 319–51 in Jaeger, W. (ed.), Scripta Minora, Vol. 2. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. 2004. Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsey, S. 2004. ‘The Argument of Metaphysics vi.3’, Ancient Philosophy 24.1: 119–34.Google Scholar
Kelsey, S. 2011. ‘Physics 199a8–12’, Apeiron 44: 112.Google Scholar
Keyt, D. 2006. ‘Plato and the Ship of State’, pp. 189213 in Santas, G. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2006. The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kosman, A. 1980. ‘Being Properly Affected: Virtues and Feelings in Aristotle’s Ethics’, pp. 103–16 in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 1973. ‘Egoism, Love, and Political Office in Plato’, Philosophical Review 82.3: 330–44.Google Scholar
Kress, E. 2019. ‘How Things Happen for the Sake of Something’, Phronesis 64.3: 321–47.Google Scholar
Lafond, Y. 1998. ‘Die Katastrophe von 373 v. Chr. und das Verschwinden der Stadt Helikê in Achaia’, pp. 118–23 in Olshausen, E. and Sonnabend, H. (eds.), Naturkatastrophen in der Antiken Welt. Stuttgarter Kolloquium zur Historischen Geographie des Altertums 6, 1996. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2000. ‘The Laws’, pp. 258–92 in Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2005. Médiation et coercition: pour une lecture des Lois de Platon. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laks, A. and Louguet, C. (eds.) 2002. Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique? Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Most, G. W. (eds.) 2016. Early Greek Philosophy, 9 vols. Loeb Classical Library 524–32. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lännström, A. 2011. ‘Socrates, the Philosopher in the Theaetetus Digression (172c–177c), and the Ideal of homoiôsis theôi’, Apeiron 44: 111–30.Google Scholar
Lasserre, F. 1966. Eudoxos von Knidos. Die Fragmente. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lebedev, A. V. 2017. ‘The Metaphor of Liber Naturae and the Alphabet Analogy in Heraclitus’ Logos-Fragments’, pp. 231–67 in Fantino, E., Muss, U., Schubert, C., and Sier, K. (eds.), Heraklit im Kontext. Studia Praesocratica 8. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lee, H. D. P. (trans.) 1952. Aristotle: Meteorologica. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leighton, S. 1982. ‘Aristotle and the Emotions’, Phronesis 27: 144–74.Google Scholar
Leighton, S. 1984. ‘Feelings and Emotions’, The Review of Metaphysics 38: 303–20.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1999. ‘Aristotle on the Biological Roots of Virtue: The Natural History of Natural Virtue’, pp. 1031 in Maienschein, J. and Ruse, M. (eds.), Biology and the Foundation of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2012. ‘Aristotle on Natural Character and Its Implications for Moral Development’, Journal of the history of philosophy 50.4: 507–30.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2014. ‘Commentary on Henry’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 29.1: 170–81.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1973. ‘Causation’, Journal of Philosophy 70.17: 556–67.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1968. ‘The Stoic Concept of Evil’, Philosophical Quarterly 18: 329–43.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1996a. Stoic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (repr. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1996b. ‘Heraclitus and Stoicism’, pp. 3557 in Long, A. A. (ed.), Stoic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1996c. ‘Stoic Eudaimonism’, pp. 179201 in Long, A. A. (ed.), Stoic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2005. ‘Law and Nature in Greek Thought’, pp. 412–30 in Gagarin, M. and Cohen, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. 2017. ‘The Ship of State and the Subordination of Socrates’, pp. 158–78 in Destrée, P. and Edmonds, R. G. iii (eds.), Plato and the Power of Images. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. [in press]. ‘Nature in Politics and Moral Psychology’, in McCabe, M. M. (ed.), Re-Reading Plato’s Republic.Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. 2006. The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, T. A. 2004. ‘Is Assimilation to God in the Theaetetus Purely Otherworldly?’, Ancient Philosophy 24: 321–38.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2007. ‘The Union of Cause and Effect in Aristotle: Physics 3.3’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32: 205–32.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2018. ‘Potentiality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics’, pp. 1543 in Engelhard, K. and Quante, M. (eds.), Handbook of Potentiality. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. 2008. Plato: Laws 10. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKenna, M. 2001. ‘Source Incompatibilism, Ultimacy, and the Transfer of Non-Responsibility’, American Philosophical Quarterly 38.1: 3751.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. 2011. Philosophy before Socrates, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 2000. ‘On Dennis Des Chene’s Physiologia’, Perspectives on Science 8.2: 119–43.Google Scholar
Mesch, W. 2013. ‘War Aristoteles ein Determinist?’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 67.1: 113–31.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. S. 1994. ‘Self-Movement and External Causation’, pp. 6580 in Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Self-Motion: From Aristotle to Newton. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. S. 2011. ‘Legislation as a Tragedy: On Plato’s Laws vii, 817b-d’, pp. 387402 in Destrée, P. and Hermann, F.-G. (eds.), Plato and the Poets. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. S. 2015. Plato: Laws 1 & 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, F. D. Jr. 1991. ‘Aristotle on Natural Law and Justice’, pp. 279306 in Keyt, D. and Miller, F. D. Jr. (eds.), A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moline, J. 1975. ‘Provided Nothing External Interferes’, Mind 84: 244–54.Google Scholar
Moore, C. 2019. ‘Socrates in Aristotle’s History of Philosophy’, pp. 173210 in Moore, C. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. 2010. ‘The Voice of Authority: Divination and Plato’s Phaedo’, Classical Quarterly 60.1: 6381.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. R. 2007. ‘The Utopian Character of Plato’s Ideal City’, pp. 232–55 in Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mosely, D. J. 1998. ‘Politics, Diplomacy and Disaster in Ancient Greece’, pp. 6777 in Olshausen, E. and Sonnabend, D. (eds.), Naturkatastrophen in der Antiken Welt. Stuttgarter Kolloquium zur Historischen Geographie des Altertums 6, 1996. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Moss, J. 2012. Aristotle on the Apparent Good: Perception, Phantasia, Thought, and Desire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1965. ‘Heraclitus Fr. 114’, American Journal of Philology 86: 258–66.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (ed.) 1993. The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, 2nd ed. with editor’s supplement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2002. ‘La Terre et les étoiles dans la cosmologie de Xénophane’, pp. 331–5 in Laks, A. and Louguet, C. (eds.), Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique? Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2008a. The Route of Parmenides. 2nd ed. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2008b. ‘The Cloud-Astrophysics of Xenophanes and Ionian Material Monism’, pp. 134–68 in Curd, P. and Graham, D. W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2013. ‘Parmenides, Early Greek Astronomy, and Modern Scientific Realism’, in McCoy, J. (ed.), Early Greek Philosophy: The Presocratics and the Emergence of Reason. Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 57. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2016. ‘“Limitless” and “Limit” in Xenophanes’ Cosmology and in His Doctrine of Epistemic “Construction” (Dokos)’, pp. 1637 in Ierodiakonou, K. and Hasper, P. S. (eds.), Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 19 [volume on Ancient Epistemology] Münster: Mentis.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 2018. ‘Practical and Productive Thinking in Aristotle’, Phronesis 63.2: 148–75.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. 1999. ‘Historiography and Cosmology in Plato’s Laws’, Ancient Philosophy 19.2: 299327.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olshausen, E. and Sonnabend, D. (eds.) 1998. Naturkatastrophen in der Antiken Welt. Stuttgarter Kolloquium zur Historischen Geographie des Altertums 6, 1996. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 1993. Plotinus: An Introduction to the Enneads. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Polansky, R. and Kuczewski, M. 1988. ‘Accidents and Processes in Aristotle’s Metaphysics E 3’, Elenchos 9: 295310.Google Scholar
Price, A., 2011. ‘Aristotle on the Ends of Deliberation’, pp. 135–58 in Pakaluk, M. and Pearson, G. (eds.), Moral Psychology and Human Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. 2002. Aristoteles: Rhetorik. Übersetzt und Erläutert, 2 vols. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. 2009. ‘Nicomachean Ethics vii.13–14: Pleasure and Eudaimonia’, pp. 209–35 in Natali, Carlo (ed.), Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Book vii: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1998. Aristotle’s Physics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1971. The Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics: A Study in the Development of Aristotle’s Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1975. ‘A Reply to John Cooper on the Magna Moralia’, American Journal of Philosophy 96.2: 160–72.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1986. Plato Phaedrus. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1990. ‘Philosophy, Love, and Madness’, pp. 227–46 in Gill, C. (ed.), The Person and the Human Mind: Issues in Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1993. The Phaedo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 2003. ‘Reply to Roger Crisp’, pp. 7986 in Heinaman, R. (ed.), Plato and Aristotle’s Ethics. London: UCL/Ashgate.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 2013. ‘Socrates and His Gods: From the Euthyphro to the Eudemian Ethics’, pp. 313–28 in Lane, M. and Harte, V. (eds.), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 2017. ‘The Athenians against the Persians: Plato’s View (Laws iii, 699b–d)’, pp. 6481 in Finamore, J. F. and Klitenic Wear, S. (eds.), Defining Platonism: Essays in Honor of the 75th Birthday of John M. Dillon. Steubenville, OH: Franciscan University Press.Google Scholar
Rue, R. 1993. ‘The Philosopher in Flight: The Digression (172C–177C) in the Theaetetus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 11: 71100.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1966. Plato’s Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sassi, M. M. 2013. ‘Where Epistemology and Religion Meet: What Do(es) the God(s) Look Like?’, Rhizomata 1: 283307.Google Scholar
Sattler, B. M. 2020. The Concept of Motion in Ancient Greek Thought: Foundations in Logic, Method, and Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2003. ‘Religion and Philosophy in the Laws’, pp. 113 in Scolnicov, S. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Plato’s Laws: From Theory into Practice. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2013. ‘Cardinal Virtues: A Contested Socratic Inheritance’, pp. 1128 in Long, A. G. (ed.), Plato and the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2015. ‘Heraclitus on Law (Fr. 114 DK)’, Rhizomata 3: 4761.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2016. ‘Plato’s Marionette’, Rhizomata 4.2: 128–53.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. and Griffith, T. 2016 (trans.) Plato: The Laws. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. 1966. The World as Will and Representation, trans. E. J. Payne. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Schöpsdau, K. 19942011. Platon: Nomoi, 3 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1997. ‘“Becoming Like God” in the Timaeus and in Aristotle’, pp. 327–39 in Calvo, T. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Interpreting the Timaeus – Critias, Proceedings of the iv Symposium Platonicum. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1999. ‘The Ideal of Godlikeness’, pp. 309–28 in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2010. ‘Teleology, Aristotelian and Platonic’, pp. 529 in Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2012. ‘The Theoretikos Bios in Alcinous’, pp. 329–48 in Bénatouil, T. and Bonazzi, M. (eds.), Theōria, Praxis and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2013. ‘The Atheist Underground’, pp. 329–48 in Harte, V. and Lane, M. (eds.), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1990. Lucretius on Death and Anxiety. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sihvola, J. 1996. ‘Emotional Animals: Do Aristotelian Emotions Require Beliefs?’, Apeiron 29: 105–44.Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. (trans.) 1975. Lucretius: On the Nature of Things. Revision of trans. by W. H. D. Rouse. Loeb Classical Library 181. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1951. ‘Epicurus and Cosmological Heresies’, American Journal of Philology 72: 123.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1960. Aristotle’s System of the Physical World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1980. Necessity, Cause, and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1993. Animals Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1999. ‘Aspasius on Emotion’, pp. 96106 in Alberti, A. and Sharples, R. (eds.), Aspasius: The Earliest Extant Commentary on Aristotle’s Ethics. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stalley, R. F. 1983. An Introduction to Plato’s Laws. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stalley, R. F. 1994. ‘Persuasion in Plato’s Laws’, History of Political Thought 15: 157–77.Google Scholar
Stein, N. 2012. ‘Causal Necessity in Aristotle’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20.5: 855–79.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1993. ‘Emotions in Context’, pp. 286302 in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Struck, P. T. 2016. Divination and Human Nature: A Cognitive History of Intuition in Classical Antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. 1928. A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 2007. ‘Nomos and Phusis in Democritus and Plato’, Social Philosophy and Policy 24.2: 120.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. 2001. ‘Legal Instructions in Classical Athens’, pp. 111–32 in Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Trivigno, F. 2011. ‘Aristotle’s Definition of Anger’, The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter 12.2: 20–7.Google Scholar
Tuozzo, T. 2014. ‘Aristotle and the Discovery of Efficient Causation’, pp. 2347 in Schmaltz, T. (ed.), Efficient Causation: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuozzo, T. 2017. ‘External Causes of Elemental Motion in Aristotle: Incidental or Per Se?’ Paper delivered at a meeting of Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy, Baltimore.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 1989. ‘Divine Movement and Human Nature in Eudemian Ethics 8.2’, Hermes 117: 2442.Google Scholar
van Emde Boas, E., Rijksbaron, A., Huitink, L., and de Bakker, M. 2019. The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2009. ‘Aristotle on Speusippus on Eudoxus on Pleasure’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 36.1: 249–81.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. 1979. ‘Aristotle’s Criticism of Eudoxan Hedonism’, Classical Philology 74.3: 214–21.Google Scholar
White, R. M. 2010. Talking about God: The Concept of Analogy and the Problem of Religious Language. Transcending Boundaries in Philosophy and Theology. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. (ed.) 1990. Alcinoos: enseignement des doctrines de Platon. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. 2012. The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca’s Natural Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. G. 1973. ‘Uniformitarianism and Catastrophism’, pp. 418–23 in Wiener, P. (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas, Vol. 4. New York: Charles Scriber’s Sons.Google Scholar
Woods, M. 1982. Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics: Books i, ii, and viii. Translated with a commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Zeyl, D. 2000. Plato: Timaeus. Translated, with introduction. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Barbara M. Sattler, University of St Andrews, Scotland, Ursula Coope, University of Oxford
  • Book: Ancient Ethics and the Natural World
  • Online publication: 13 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108885133.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Barbara M. Sattler, University of St Andrews, Scotland, Ursula Coope, University of Oxford
  • Book: Ancient Ethics and the Natural World
  • Online publication: 13 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108885133.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Barbara M. Sattler, University of St Andrews, Scotland, Ursula Coope, University of Oxford
  • Book: Ancient Ethics and the Natural World
  • Online publication: 13 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108885133.013
Available formats
×