Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:10:53.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The algebraic complexity of maximum likelihood estimation for bivariate missing data

from Part I - Contingency tables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2010

Paolo Gibilisco
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Roma 'Tor Vergata'
Eva Riccomagno
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Genova
Maria Piera Rogantin
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Genova
Henry P. Wynn
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Abstract

We study the problem of maximum likelihood estimation for general patterns of bivariate missing data for normal and multinomial random variables, under the assumption that the data is missing at random (MAR). For normal data, the score equations have nine complex solutions, at least one of which is real and statistically relevant. Our computations suggest that the number of real solutions is related to whether or not the MAR assumption is satisfied. In the multinomial case, all solutions to the score equations are real and the number of real solutions grows exponentially in the number of states of the underlying random variables, though there is always precisely one statistically relevant local maxima.

Introduction

A common problem in statistical analysis is dealing with missing data in some of the repeated measures of response variables. A typical instance arises during longitudinal studies in the social and biological sciences, when participants may miss appointments or drop out of the study altogether. Over very long term studies nearly all measurements will involve some missing data, so it is usually impractical to throw out these incomplete cases. Furthermore, the underlying cause for the missing data (e.g. a subject dies) might play an important role in inference with the missing data that will lead to false conclusions in the complete case analysis. Thus, specialised techniques are needed in the setting where some of the data is missing. A useful reference for this material is (Little and Rubin 2002), from which we will draw notation and definitions. See also (Dempster et al. 1977) and (Little and Rubin 1983) for reviews, and (Rubin 1976) for an early reference.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×