Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:36:18.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2023

Matthew Rhodes-Purdy ,
Rachel Navarre  and
Stephen Utych
Matthew Rhodes-Purdy
Affiliation:
Clemson University, South Carolina
Rachel Navarre
Affiliation:
Bridgewater State University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Age of Discontent
Populism, Extremism, and Conspiracy Theories in Contemporary Democracies
 , pp. 252 - 278
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2011. “Partisan polarization and the rise of the tea party.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2018. The great alignment: Race, party transformation, and the rise of Donald Trump. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan, and McCoy, Jennifer. 2018. “United States: Racial resentment, negative partisanship, and polarization in Trump’s America.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681 (1): 137–156.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is polarization a myth?” The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 542–555.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Webster, Steven. 2016. “The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century.” Electoral Studies 41: 12–22.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James. 2006. The economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher, and Bartels, Larry. 2017. “Blind retrospection: Electoral responses to droughts, floods, and shark attacks.” In Democracy for Realists, edited by Achen, Christopher and Bartels, Larry, 116–145. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, James, and Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2009. “Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: Spatial theory and the synamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 825–846.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor, Frenkel-Brenswik, Else, Levinson, Daniel J., and Sanford, R. Nevitt. 2019. The authoritarian personality. New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Aguilar, Rosario, and Carlin, Ryan E.. 2017. “Ideational populism in Chile? A case study.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 404–422.Google Scholar
Akkerman, Agnes, Mudde, Cas, and Zaslove, Andrej. 2014. “How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (9): 1324–1353.Google Scholar
Albertson, Bethany, and Kushner Gadarian, Shana. 2015. Anxious politics: Democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allport, Gordon Willard, Clark, Kenneth, and Pettigrew, Thomas. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, Robert A. 1981. Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnepeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, Robert A. 1996. The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2010. Direct democracy worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2011. Direct democracy worldwide, Kindle edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Álvarez, Roberto, García-Marín, Álvaro, and Ilabaca, Sebastián. 2021. “Commodity price shocks and poverty reduction in Chile.” Resources Policy 70: 101177.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2002. The deadlock of democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Lene Rachel, and Björkman, Tomas. 2017. The Nordic secret. Stockholm: Fri tanke.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. 2007. “The end of economic voting? Contingency dilemmas and the limits of democratic accountability.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 271–296.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2017. Private government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, John R. 1983. “A spreading activation theory of memory.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22 (3): 261–295.Google Scholar
Andrews-Lee, Caitlin. 2019. “The revival of charisma: Experimental evidence from Argentina and Venezuela.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (5): 687–719.Google Scholar
Angyal, Andras. 1941. Foundations for a science of personality. New York: The Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1973. The origins of totalitarianism, Vol. 244. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Autor, David Dorn, Hanson, Gordon, and Majlesi, Kaveh. 2020. “Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure.” American Economic Review 110 (10): 3139–3183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. 2001. “Participation, activism, and politics: The Porto Alegre experiment and Deliberative democratic theory.” Politics & Society 29 (1): 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy. 2009. The market and the masses in Latin America: Policy reform and consumption in liberalizing economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Peter. 2019. “Trump declares a national emergency, and provokes a constitutional clash.” New York Times, February 15.Google Scholar
Baland, Jean-Marie, and Robinson, James A. 2008. “Land and power: Theory and evidence from Chile.” American Economic Review 98 (5): 1737–1765.Google Scholar
Balta, Evren, Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, and Yagci, Alper H.. 2022. “Populist attitudes and conspiratorial thinking.” Party Politics 28 (4): 625–637.Google Scholar
Bandura, Albert. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.” Psychological Review 84 (2): 191–215.Google Scholar
Bandura, Albert. 1982. “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.” American Psychologist 37 (2): 122–147.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R. 1996. Jihad vs. McWorld: How globalism and tribalism are reshaping the world. New York: Ballentine Books.Google Scholar
Bartle, John. 2018. “Why the conservatives lost their majority – but still won.” In None past the post: Britain at the polls, 2017, edited by Allen, Nicholas and Bartle, John, 272–319. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Başok, Emre, and Sayer, Peter. 2020. “Language ideologies, language policies and their translation into Fiscal policies in the U.S. perspectives of language education community stakeholders.” Journal of Culture and Values in Education 3 (2): 54–80.Google Scholar
Becker, Sascha O., Fetzer, Thiemo, and Novy, Dennis. 2017. “Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis.” Economic Policy 32 (92): 601–650.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. 2018. “Telling the truth about believing the Lies? Evidence for the limited prevalence of expressive survey responding.” The Journal of Politics 80 (1): 211–224.Google Scholar
Berman, Sherri. 2019. “Populism and the decline of social democracy.” Journal of Democracy 30 (3): 5–19.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy, and Bartels, Larry. 2014. Mass politics in tough times: Opinions, votes and protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bidegain, Germán, and Tricot, Víctor. 2017. “Political opportunity structure, social movements, and malaise in representation in Uruguay, 1985–2014.” In Malaise in representation in Latin American countries, edited by Joignant, Alfredo, Quiroga, Mauricio Morales, and Fuentes, Claudio, 139–160. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsall, Nancy, Lustig, Nora, and Meyer, Christian J.. 2014. “The strugglers: The new poor in Latin America?” World Development 60: 132–146.Google Scholar
Booth, John A., and Seligson, Mitchell. 2009. The legitimacy puzzle: Political support and democracy in eight nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borzutzky, Silvia, and Perry, Sarah. 2021. “‘It is not about the 30 pesos, it is about the 30 years’: Chile’s elitist democracy, social movements, and the October 18 protests.” The Latin Americanist 65 (2): 207–232.Google Scholar
Boucoyannis, Deborah. 2013. “The equalizing hand: Why Adam Smith thought the market should produce wealth without steep inequality.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (4): 1051–1070.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted, and Marcus, George E.. 2013. “Emotion and political psychology.” In The Oxford handbook of political psychology, edited by Huddy, Leonie, Sears, David, and Levy, Jack, 165–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breen, Richard, Karlson, Kristian Bernt, and Holm, Anders. 2013. “Total, direct, and indirect effects in logit and probit models.” Sociological Methods & Research 42 (2): 164–191.Google Scholar
Brockner, Joel, Konovsky, Mary, Cooper-Schneider, Rochelle, Folger, Robert, Martin, Christopher, and Bies, Robert J.. 1994. “Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss.” The Academy of Management Journal 37 (2): 397–409.Google Scholar
Bruder, Martin, Haffke, Peter, Neave, Nick, Nouripanah, Nina, and Imhoff, Roland. 2013. “Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire.” Frontiers in Psychology 4 (225). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225.Google Scholar
Bruton, Henry J. 1998. “A reconsideration of import substitution.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (2): 903–936.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 2001. “Democratization and economic reform.” Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1): 43–65.Google Scholar
Burkhart, Ross E., and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 1994. “Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis.” American Political Science Review 88 (4): 903–910.Google Scholar
Busby, Ethan, Gubler, Joshua R., and Hawkins, Kirk A.. 2019. “Framing and blame attribution in populist rhetoric.” Journal of Politics 81 (2): 616–630.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren E.. 1954. The voter decides. Evanston: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rosie. 2018. “A coalition of chaos: Where next?” In None past the post: Britain at the polls, 2017, edited by Allen, Nicholas and Bartle, John, 320–353. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, Marilyn, and Alter Chen, Martha. 2002. Globalization and the informal economy: How global trade and investment impact on the working poor. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Carreras, Miguel, Irepoglu Carreras, Yasemin, and Bowler, Shaun. 2019. “Long-term economic distress, cultural backlash, and support for Brexit.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (9): 1396–1424.Google Scholar
Cassim, Ziyad, Handjiski, Borko, Schubert, Jörg, and Zouaoui, Yassir. 2020. “The $10 trillion rescue: How governments can help deliver impact.” McKinsey & Company. www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/the-10-trillion-dollar-rescue-how-governments-can-deliver-impact. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Castanho Silva, Bruno, Andreadis, Ioannis, Adnduiza, Eva, Blanusa, Nebojsa, Corti, Yazmin Morlet, Delfino, Gisela, Rico, Guillem, Ruth-Lovell, Saskia P., Spruyt, Bram, Steenbergen, Marco, and Littvay, Levente. 2018. “Public opinion surveys: A new scale.” In The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory and analysis, edited by Kirk A., Hawkins, Carlin, Ryan E. and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, 150–178. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Castanho Silva, Bruno, Vegetti, Federico, and Littvay, Levente. 2017. “The elite is up to something: Exploring the relation between populism and belief in conspiracy theories.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 423–443.Google Scholar
Castiglioni, Rossana. 2005. The politics of social policy change in Chile and Uruguay: Retrenchment versus maintenance 1973–1998. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Castro, Irene. 2013. Diez incumplimientos electorales de Mariano Rajoy. El Dario, November 19.Google Scholar
CBC News. 2008. “Barbs fly over economy as leaders return to campaign trail.” CBC News, October 3. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/barbs-fly-over-economy-as-leaders-return-to-campaign-trail-1.716130. Accessed August 27, 2021.Google Scholar
Chagas-Bastos, Fabrício H. 2019. “Political realignment in Brazil: Jair Bolsonaro and the right turn.” Revista de Estudios Sociales (69): 92–100.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone, and Kopstein, Jeffery. 2001. “Bad civil society.” Political Theory 29 (6): 837–865.Google Scholar
Choi, Eunjung, and Woo, Jongseok. 2010. “Political corruption, economic performance, and electoral outcomes: A cross-national analysis.” Contemporary Politics 16 (3): 249–262.Google Scholar
Christin, Thomas, Hug, Simon, and Sciarini, Pascal. 2002. “Interests and information in referendum voting: An analysis of Swiss voters.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6): 759–776.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold, Goodwin, Matthew, and Whiteley, Paul. 2017. Brexit: Why Britain voted to leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold, Whiteley, Paul, Borges, Walter, Sanders, David, and Stewart, Marianne. 2016. “Modelling the dynamics of support for a right-wing populist party: The case of UKIP.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 26 (2): 135–154.Google Scholar
Coaston, Jane. 2020. “QAnon, the scarily popular pro-Trump conspiracy theory, explained.” Vox. www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/1/17253444/qanon-trump-conspiracy-theory-4chan-explainer. Accessed September 5, 2021.Google Scholar
Colantone, Italo, and Stanig, Piero. 2018a. “Global competition and Brexit.” American Political Science Review 112 (2): 201–218.Google Scholar
Colantone, Italo, and Stanig, Piero. 2018b. “The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (4): 936–953.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Mahon, James. 1993. “Conceptual ‘stretching’ revisited.” American Political Science Review 87 (4): 845–855.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 2002. Shaping the political arena. South Bend: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Feldman, Stanley. 1986. “Emotional reactions to the economy: I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (1): 50–78.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1964. “The nature of belief systems in mass publics.” In Ideology and discontent, edited by David E., Apter, 206–261. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier. 2010. “The repeating revolution: Chávez’s new politics and old economics.” In Leftist governments in Latin America: Successes and shortcomings, edited by Kurt, Weyland, Raúl L, Madrid, and Wendy, Hunter, 28–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier. 2011. “Why polarize? Advantages and disadvantages of a rational-choice analysis of government–opposition relations under Hugo Chávez.” In The revolution in Venezuela: Social and political change under Chávez, edited by Thomas, Ponniah and Eastwood, Johnathan, 67–98. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier, and Penfold, Michael. 2015. Dragon in the tropics: Venezuela and the legacy of Hugo Chávez, 2nd edition. New York: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Costello, Thomas E., Bowes, Shauna M., Stevens, Sean T., Waldman, Irwin D., Tasimi, Arber, and Lilienfeld, Scott O.. 2021. “Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000341.Google Scholar
Cowen, Alan S., and Keltner, Dacher. 2017. “Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (38): E7900–E7909.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1990. “Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 903–935.Google Scholar
Craig, Stephen C., Niemi, Richard G., and Silver, Glenn E.. 1990. “Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items.” Political Behavior 12 (3): 289–314.Google Scholar
Cramer, Katherine J. 2016. The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crocker, Jennifer, Luhtanen, Riia, Broadnax, Stephanie, and Evan Blaine, Bruce. 1999. “Belief in US government conspiracies against Blacks among Black and white college students: Powerlessness or system blame?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (8): 941–953.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, Russell, and Ambrose, Marueen L.. 2002. “Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda.” In Advances in organizational justice, edited by Greenberg, Jerald and Cropanzano, Russell, 119–151. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 1993. Industrial relations and European state traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2009. “Privatised Keynesianism: An unacknowledged policy regime.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 11 (3): 382–399.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2011. The strange non-death of neo-liberalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2018. The globalization backlash. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Crow, David. 2010. “The party’s over: Citizen conceptions of democracy and political dissatisfaction in Mexico.” Comparative Politics 43 (1): 41–61.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michael, Huntington, Samuel, and Watanuki, Joji. 1975. The crisis of democracy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1985. A preface to economic democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Stefan, and Linde, Jonas. 2016. “Losing happily? The mitigating effect of democracy and quality of government on the winner–loser gap in political support.” International Journal of Public Administration 39 (9): 652–664.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2013. Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Washington, DC: Cq Press.Google Scholar
De la Torre, Carlos. 2019. Populisms: A quick immersion. New York: Tibidabo Publishing.Google Scholar
DeCharms, Richard. 1968. Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Desposato, Scott W. 2006. “From revolution to Rouba Mas Faz?” ReVista: Harvard Review of Latin America 5 (1): 29–32.Google Scholar
Dettrey, Bryan J. 2013. “Relative losses and economic voting: Sociotropic considerations or ‘keeping up with the Joneses’?” Politics & Policy 41 (5): 788–806.Google Scholar
Pabón, Díaz, Andrés, Fabio, and Gabriela Palacio Ludeña, María. 2021. “Inequality and the socioeconomic dimensions of mobility in protests: The cases of Quito and Santiago.” Global Policy 12 (S2): 78–90.Google Scholar
Pavlic, Disi, Rodolfo. 2018. “Sentenced to debt: Explaining student mobilization in Chile.” Latin American Research Review 53 (3): 448–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlic, Disi, Rodolfo. 2021. “The nearness of youth: Spatial and temporal effects of protests on political attitudes in Chile.” Latin American Politics and Society 63 (1): 72–94.Google Scholar
Donadio, Rachel, and Fuchs, Dale. 2010. Spanish Premier insists economic recovery is near. New York Times, February 17. www.nytimes.com/2010/02/18/world/europe/18spain.html. Accessed July 20, 2021.Google Scholar
Döring, Holger, and Manow, Philip. 2021. Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. https://parlgov.org/data-info/. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Carter. 2008. “Stopping a financial crisis, the Swedish Way.” The New York Times, September 22. www.nytimes.com/2008/09/23/business/worldbusiness/23krona.html. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Douglas, Karen M., Sutton, Robbie M., and Cichocka, Aleksandra. 2017. “The psychology of conspiracy theories.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 26 (6): 538–542.Google Scholar
Douglas, Karen M., Uscinski, Joseph E., Sutton, Robbie M., Aleksandra, Cichocka, Nefes, Turkay, Siang Ang, Chee, and Deravi, Farzin. 2019. “Understanding conspiracy theories.” Political Psychology 40 (S1): 3–35.Google Scholar
Dowsett, Sonya. 2010. “Spain austerity plan scrapes through parliament.” Reuters, May 27. www.reuters.com/article/us-spain-idUSTRE64Q54T20100527. Accessed July 20, 2021.Google Scholar
Duckworth, Cheryl. 2008. “Maria Montessori and peace education.” In Encyclopedia of peace education, edited by Bajaj, Monisha, 33–37. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Duque, Debora, and Erica Smith, Amy. 2019. “The establishment upside down: A year of change in Brazil.” Revista de Ciencia Política 39 (2): 165–189:Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Chaiken, Shelly. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1975. “A reassessment of the concept of political support.” British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 435–457.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sam. 2019. “Spain’s Watergate: Inside the corruption scandal that changed a nation.” The Guardian, March 1. www.theguardian.com/news/2019/mar/01/spain-watergate-corruption-scandal-politics-gurtel-case. Accessed July 27, 2021.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 2018. The populist temptation: Economic grievance and political reaction in the modern era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul, and Friesen, Wallace V.. 1971. “Constants across cultures in the face and emotion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17 (2): 124–129.Google Scholar
Elchardus, Mark, and Spruyt, Bram. 2012. “The contemporary contradictions of egalitarianism: An empirical analysis of the relationship between the old and new left/right alignments.” European Political Science Review 4 (2): 217–239.Google Scholar
Elchardus, Mark, and Spruyt, Bram. 2016. “Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: An empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology.” Government and Opposition 51 (1): 111–133.Google Scholar
Ellis, Faron. 2016. “Conservative campaign: Defeated but not devastated.” In The Canadian federal election of 2015, edited by Jon H., Pammett and Dornan, Christopher, 23–56. Toronto: Dudurn.Google Scholar
Encarnación, Omar G. 2005. “Do political pacts freeze democracy? Spanish and south American lessons.” West European Politics 28 (1): 182–203.Google Scholar
Enders, Adam M. 2021. “Issues versus affect: How do elite and mass polarization compare?” The Journal of Politics 83 (4): 1872–1877.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, Andrew M. 2018. “Racial attitudes through a partisan lens.” British Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 1062–1079.Google Scholar
Erten, Bilge, and Antonio Ocampo, José. 2013. “Super cycles of commodity prices since the mid-nineteenth century.” World Development 44: 14–30.Google Scholar
Escolar, Ignacio. 2012. “Spain did not swing to the right, the left collapsed.” The Guardian, February 3. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/feb/03/spain-left-collapsed. Accessed July 20, 2021.Google Scholar
Etheridge, Eric. 2009. “Rick Santelli: Tea Party time.” The New York Times, February 20. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/rick-santelli-tea-party-time/. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Thomas, Page, Benjamin, Rothschild, Jacob, Chang, Arturo, and Chen, Jie. 2018. “The economic and social roots of populist rebellion: Support for Donald Trump in 2016.” Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series 83. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3306267. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Jorge M., Magalhães, Pedro C., and Santana-Pereira, José. 2018. “Portugal’s leftist government: From sick man to poster boy?” South European Society and Politics 23 (4): 503–524.Google Scholar
Filer, Tanya. 2018. “The hidden and revealed: styles of political conspiracy theory in Kirchnerism.” In Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them, edited by Uscinski, Joseph, 395–409. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Filindra, Alexandra. 2019. “Is ‘threat’ in the eye of the researcher? Theory and measurement in the study of state-level immigration policymaking.” Policy Studies Journal 47 (3): 517–543.Google Scholar
Fishbein, Martin, and Ajzen, Icek. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ford, Robert, and Goodwin, Matthew J.. 2014. Revolt on the right: Explaining support for the radical right in Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forgas, Joseph P. 1995. “Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).” Psychological Bulletin 117 (1): 39–66.Google Scholar
Forgas, Joseph P., and Bower, Gordon H. 1987. “Mood effects on person-perception judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (1): 53–60.Google Scholar
Forgas, Joseph P., Crano, William D., and Fiedler, Klaus, eds. 2021. The psychology of populism: The tribal challenge to liberal democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forgas, Joseph P., and Moylan, Stephanie. 1987. “After the movies: Transient mood and social judgments.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13 (4): 467–477.Google Scholar
Fowler, Anthony, and Hall, Andrew B.. 2018. “Do shark attacks influence presidential elections? Reassessing a prominent finding on voter competence.” The Journal of Politics 80 (4): 1423–1437.Google Scholar
Freire, André, Barragán, Mélany, Coller, Xavier, Lisi, Marco, and Tsatsanis, Emmanouil. 2020. “Southern Europe and the eurozone crisis: Political representation, party system characteristics and the impact of austerity.” In Political representation in southern Europe and Latin America, edited by Freire, André, Barragán, Mélany, Coller, Xavier, Lisi, Marco, and Tsatsanis, Emmanouil, 17–33. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 2020. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fuentes, J. Rodrigo. 2011. “Learning how to manage natural resource revenue.” In Plundered nations? Successes and failures in natural resource extraction, edited by Collier, Paul and Anthony J., Venables, 79–113. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2006. The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gadarian, Shana Kushner, and Albertson, Bethany. 2014. “Anxiety, immigration, and the search for information.” Political Psychology 35 (2): 133–164.Google Scholar
Gamble, Andrew. 2015. “The economy.” Parliamentary Affairs 68 (Supplement 1): 154–167.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 2003. Incomplete democracy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Garrido, Hugo, González, Isabel, and Aguirre, Javier. 2019. “El PP perdió 1,6 millones de votos con Vox y 1,4 con Ciudadanos.” El Mundo, April 30. www.elmundo.es/espana/2019/04/30/5cc76591fdddff52528b469d.html. Accessed August 8, 2021.Google Scholar
Georgiadou, Vasiliki, Rori, Lamprini, and Roumanias, Costas. 2018. “Mapping the European far right in the 21st century: A meso-level analysis.” Electoral Studies 54: 103–115.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Huber, Gregory A.. 2010. “Partisanship, political control, and economic assessments.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 153–173.Google Scholar
Germani, Gino. 1978. Authoritarianism, fascism, and national populism. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Gest, Justin. 2016. The new minority: White working class politics in an age of immigration and inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gidron, Noam, and Hall, Peter A.. 2019. “Populism as a problem of social integration.” Comparative Political Studies 53 (7): 1027–1059.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and democratic responsiveness.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 778–796.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2009. Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 564–581.Google Scholar
Gimpel, James G., Lovin, Nathan, Moy, Bryant, and Reeves, Andrew. 2020. “The urban–rural gulf in American political behavior.” Political Behavior 42 (4): 1343–1368.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin, and Shefter, Martin. 1999. Politics by other means: Politicians, prosecutors, and the press from Watergate to Whitewater. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Goetz, Stephan J., Davlasheridze, Meri, Han, Yicheol, and Fleming-Muñoz, David A.. 2019. “Explaining the 2016 vote for President Trump across U.S. counties.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 41 (4): 703–722.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Julie H., Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1999. “Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor.” European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 781–795.Google Scholar
Golder, Matt. 2016. “Far right parties in Europe.” Annual Review of Political Science 19 (1): 477–497.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, Mario, and Bushman, Brad J.. 2012. “Do victims of injustice punish to improve their mood?” Social Psychological and Personality Science 3 (5): 572–580.Google Scholar
Gomila, Robin. 2021. “Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 150 (4): 700–709.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Ricardo. 2019. Estudio Nacional de Opinión Pública 84. Santiago de Chile: Encuesta CEP.Google Scholar
Goodhart, David. 2017. The road to somewhere: The populist revolt and the future of politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Matthew J., and Heath, Oliver. 2016. “The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: An aggregate-level analysis of the result.” The Political Quarterly 87 (3): 323–332.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Matthew, and Milazzo, Caitlin. 2015. UKIP: Inside the campaign to redraw the map of British politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2004. Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Duncan. 2003. Silent revolution: The rise and crisis of market economics in Latin America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, James J. 2013. Handbook of emotion regulation, 2nd edition. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gross, Justin H., and Johnson, Kaylee T.. 2016. “Twitter taunts and tirades: Negative campaigning in the age of Trump.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (4): 748–754.Google Scholar
Guiso, Luigi, Herrera, Helios, Morelli, Massimo, and Sonno, Tommaso. 2017. Demand and supply of populism. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted. 1971. Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2008. The great risk shift: The new economic insecurity and the decline of the American dream. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2020. Let them eat tweets: How the right rules in an age of extreme inequality. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Handlin, Samuel. 2019. State crisis in fragile democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A. 2009. “Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1040–1067.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A. 2010. Venezuela’s chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A. 2018. “The ideational approach.” In Routledge handbook of global populism, edited by De la, Carlos Torre, , 57–72 New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A., Aguilar, Rosario, Silva, Bruno Castanho, Jenne, Erin K., Kocijan, Bojana, and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. 2019. “Measuring populist discourse: The global populism database.” Presented at the EPSA Annual Conference, Belfast, UK, June 20–22.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A., and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2017. “The ideational approach to populism.” Latin American Research Review 52 (4): 513–528.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A., and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2018. “Measuring populist discourse in the United States and beyond.” Nature Human Behaviour 2 (4): 241–242.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A., Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, and Andreadis, Ioannis. 2018. “The activation of populist attitudes.” Government and Opposition 55 (2): 1–25.Google Scholar
Hawley, George. 2011. “Political threat and immigration: Party identification, demographic context, and immigration policy preference.” Social Science Quarterly 92 (2): 404–422.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2009. “Good inflation, bad inflation: The housing boom, economic growth and the disaggregation of inflationary preferences in the UK and Ireland.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 11 (3): 461–478.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin, Riiheläinen, Jari Matti, Smith, Nicola J, and Watson, Matthew. 2008. “Ireland: The outlier inside.” In The euro at ten: Europeanisation, power and convergence, edited by Dyson, Kenneth, 182–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friederick A. 2007. The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Healy, Andrew J., Malhotra, Neil, and Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia. 2010. “Irrelevant events affect voters: Evaluations of government performance.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (29): 12804–12809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heneghan, Tom. 2011. “Sarkozy joins allies burying multiculturalism.” Reuters, February 11.Google Scholar
Herndon, Thomas, Ash, Michael, and Pollin, Robert. 2014. “Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (2): 257–279.Google Scholar
Hicks, John Donald. 1931a. “The persistence of populism.” Minnesota History 12 (1): 3–20.Google Scholar
Hicks, John Donald. 1931b. The populist revolt: A history of the Farmers’ Alliance and the People’s Party. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Response to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. 2016. “The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (9): 1259–1277.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2016. “The ecstatic edge of politics: Sociology and Donald Trump.” Contemporary Sociology 45 (6): 683–689.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2018. Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. The Age of Reform: From Bryan to FDR. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 2012. The paranoid style in American politics. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Houle, Christian, and Kenny, Paul D.. 2018. “The political and economic consequences of populist rule in Latin America.” Government and Opposition 53 (2): 256–287.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 2007. “The normalization of an anomaly: The workers’ party in Brazil.” World Politics 59 (3): 440–475.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, and Power, Timothy J.. 2019. “Bolsonaro and Brazil’s illiberal backlash.” Journal of Democracy 30 (1): 68–82.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1965. “Political development and decay.” World Politics 17 (3): 386–430.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2016. “Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash.” Unpublished working paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2818659. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2017. “Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse.” Perspectives on Politics 15 (2): 443–454.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2019. Cultural backlash and the rise of populism: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund. 2012. “World economic outlook: October 2012.” In World Economic and Financial Surveys. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Isidore, Chris. 2014. “US ends TARP with $15.3 billion profit.” CNN Money, December 19. https://money.cnn.com/2014/12/19/news/companies/government-bailouts-end/#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20government%20essentially%20closed,and%20the%20U.S.%20auto%20industry. Accessed March 15, 2021.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2019. Democracy and prosperity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2015. “Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 690–707.Google Scholar
Izquierdo, José María. 2014. “Popular Party awaiting judgment day.” El País, February 4. https://english.elpais.com/elpais/2014/02/04/inenglish/1391511180_144115.html. Accessed July 27, 2021.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2013. “Partisan polarization in American politics: A background paper.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43 (4): 688–708.Google Scholar
Jardina, Ashley. 2019. White identity politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jardina, Ashley, Kalmoe, Nathan, and Gross, Kimberly. 2021. “Disavowing white identity: How social disgust can change social identities.” Political Psychology 42 (4): 619–636.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Brooke. 2016. “Back to the future: The resurgent Liberals.” In The Canadian federal election of 2015, edited by Pammett, Jon H. and Dornan, Christopher, 57–84. Toronto: Dundurn.Google Scholar
Jost, John T. 2019. “Anger and authoritarianism mediate the effects of fear on support for the far right – what Vasilopoulos et al. (2019) really found.” Political Psychology 40 (4): 705–711.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 2012. “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.” In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making, edited by Maclean, Leonard C and Ziemba, William T, 99–127. New Jersey: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Kambhampati, Sandhya. 2020. “The coronavirus stimulus package versus the Recovery Act.” Los Angeles Times, March 26. www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020–2003–26/coronavirus-stimulus-package-versus-recovery-act. Accessed March 12, 2021.Google Scholar
Kamin, Steven B., and Pounder DeMarco, Laurie. 2012. “How did a domestic housing slump turn into a global financial crisis?” Journal of International Money and Finance 31 (1): 10–41.Google Scholar
Kayam, Orly. 2020. “Straight to the people: Donald Trump’s rhetorical style on Twitter in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.” Language and Dialogue 10 (2): 149–170.Google Scholar
Kazin, Michael. 1998. The populist persuasion: An American history, Kindle edition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kendi, Ibram X. 2019. How to be an antiracist. London: One World.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kam, Cindy. 2009. Us and them: Ethnocentric foundations of American opinion. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic politics: The American case.” British Journal of Political Science 11 (2): 129–161.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn M.. 1996. Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1999. “Mapping political support in the 1990s: A global analysis.” In Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance, edited by Norris, Pipa, 31–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Laurence. 2012. “Spanish economy: What is to blame for its problems.” BBC News, May 18. www.bbc.com/news/business-17753891. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Koltai, Jonathan, Francesco, Maria Varchetta, McKee, Martin, and Stuckler, David. 2019. “Deaths of despair and Brexit votes: Cross-local authority statistical analysis in England and Wales.” American Journal of Public Health 110 (3): 401–406.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon, and Frey, Timotheos. 2006. “Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (6): 921–956.Google Scholar
Kristjanpoller, Werner, Olson, Josephine E., and Salazar, Rodolfo I.. 2016. “Does the commodities boom support the export led growth hypothesis? Evidence from Latin American countries.” Latin American Economic Review 25 (6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40503-016-0036-z.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 2004a. “The dilemmas of democracy in the open economy: Lessons from Latin America.” World Politics 56 (2): 262–302.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 2004b. Free market democracy and the Chilean and Mexican countryside. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kwon, Hyeok Yong. 2004. “Economic reform and democratization: Evidence from Latin America and post-socialist countries.” British Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 357–368.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1977. Politics and ideology in Marxist theory. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemony and socialist theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lamberti, P. 2019. “Millennials just aren’t that into starting families; is that such a bad thing?” Money Under 30, March 14. www.moneyunder30.com/millenials-waiting-to-start-a-family. Accessed May 4, 2021.Google Scholar
Lapper, Richard. 2021. Beef, Bible and bullets: Brazil in the age of Bolsonaro. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Layton, Matthew L., Smith, Amy Erica, Moseley, Mason W., and Cohen, Mollie J.. 2021. “Demographic polarization and the rise of the far right: Brazil’s 2018 presidential election.” Research & Politics 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168021990204.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Richard S. 1991. Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure majorities: Congress and the perpetual campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Yphtach. 2016. “Mass polarization: Manifestations and measurements.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (S1): 392–410.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Keltner, Dacher. 2000. “Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice.” Cognition and Emotion 14 (4): 473–493.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How democracies die. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark Irving, and Zuckerman, Alan S.. 2009. Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lillard, Angeline S., Heise, Megan J., Richey, Eve M., Tong, Xin, Hart, Alyssa, and Bray, Paige M.. 2017. “Montessori preschool elevates and equalizes child outcomes: A longitudinal study.” Frontiers in Psychology 8 (1783). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01783.Google Scholar
Lind, E. Allan. 2001. “Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.” In Advances in Organizational Justice, edited by Greenberg, Jerald and Cropanzano, Russell, 56–88. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lind, E. Allan, and Tyler, Tom R.. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice: Critical issues in social justice. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lind, E. Allan, and van den Bos, Kees. 2002. “When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management.” Research in Organizational Behavior 24: 181–223.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1955. “The radical right: A problem for American democracy.” The British Journal of Sociology 6 (2): 176–209.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1963. Political man: The social bases of politics. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Lisi, Marco. 2016. “U-turn: The Portuguese radical left from marginality to government support.” South European Society and Politics 21 (4): 541–560.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 2003. Two treatises of government: Rethinking the Western tradition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
López-Calva, Luis Felipe, and Claudia Lustig, Nora. 2010. Declining inequality in Latin America: A decade of progress? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2011. “Party brands in crisis: Partisanship, brand dilution, and the breakdown of political parties in Latin America.” PhD thesis, Department of Politics, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Luther, Kurt Richard, and Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand. 2002. Political parties in the new Europe: Political and analytical challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macdougall, Alex I., Feddes, Allard R., and Doosje, Bertjan. 2020. “‘They’ve put nothing in the pot!’: Brexit and the key psychological motivations behind voting ‘remain’ and ‘leave’.” Political Psychology 41 (5): 979–995.Google Scholar
Madariaga, Aldo, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2020. “Right-wing moderation, left-wing inertia and political partelisation in post-transition Chile.” Journal of Latin American Studies 52 (2): 343–371.Google Scholar
Madsen, Douglass, and Snow, Peter G.. 1991. The charismatic bond: Political behavior in a time of crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Magalhães, Pedro C. 2016. “Economic evaluations, procedural fairness, and satisfaction with democracy.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (3): 552–534.Google Scholar
Magalhães, Pedro C., and Aguiar-Conraria, Luís. 2018. “Procedural fairness, the economy, and support for political authorities.” Political Psychology 40 (1): 165–181.Google Scholar
Maioni, Antonia. 1997. “Parting at the crossroads: The development of health insurance in Canada and the United States, 1940–1965.” Comparative Politics 29 (4): 411–431.Google Scholar
Malbin, Michael J., Bedlington, Anne H, Boatright, Robert G, Campbell, James E, Cooper, Alexandra, Corrado, Anthony, Dwyre, Diana, Green, John C, Herrnson, Paul S, Kolodny, Robin, La Raja, Raymond J, Powell, Lynda, Reifler, Jason, Rozell, Mark J, Skinner, Richard, Steen, Jennifer A, Webster, Benjamin A, and Wilcox, Clyde. 2003. Life after Reform: When the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act Meets Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Malik, Kenan. 2015. “The failure of multiculturalism: Community versus society in Europe.” Foreign Affairs 94: 21.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi, and Wilson, Carole J.. 2007. “Why do corrupt governments maintain public support?” Comparative Political Studies 40 (8): 949–970.Google Scholar
Marcos-Marne, Hugo, Plaza-Colodro, Carolina, and Freyburg, Tina. 2020. “Who votes for new parties? Economic voting, political ideology and populist attitudes.” West European Politics 43 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E. 2010. Sentimental citizen: Emotion in democratic politics. University Park: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E. 2021. “The rise of populism: The politics of justice, anger, and grievance.” In The psychology of populism, edited by Fiedler, Klaus, Crano, William D. and Forgas, Joseph P., 81–104. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., and Brader, Ted. 2014. “Emotion and political psychology.” In The Oxford handbook of political psychology, edited by Huddy, Leonie, Sears, David, and Levy, Jack, 165–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., and MacKuen, Michael B.. 1993. “Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 672–685.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., MacKuen, Michael, and Neuman, W. Russell. 2011. “Parsimony and complexity: Developing and testing theories of affective intelligence.” Political Psychology 32 (2): 323–336.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Russell Neuman, W., and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Valentino, Nicholas, and Vasilopoulos, Pavlos. 2019. “Applying the theory of affective intelligence to support for authoritarian policies and parties.” Political Psychology 40 (S1): 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12571.Google Scholar
Mariner, Wendy K., Annas, George J., and Glantz, Leonard H.. 2005. “Jacobson v Massachusetts: It’s not your great-great-grandfather’s public health law.” American Journal of Public Health 95 (4): 581–590.Google Scholar
Martínez, Guillem. 2015. “15-M, four years on: Caught between rupture and regeneration.” El País, May 15. https://english.elpais.com/elpais/2015/05/15/inenglish/1431703911_191382.html?rel=mas. Accessed July 20, 2021.Google Scholar
Mason, Liliana. 2018. Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2010. “Popular control of public policy: A quantitative approach.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5: 133–167.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McDonnell, Duncan, and Ondelli, Stefano. 2020. “The language of right-wing populist leaders: Not so simple.” Perspectives on Politics, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720002418.Google Scholar
McFarlin, Dean B., and Sweeney, Paul D.. 1992. “Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes.” Academy of Management Journal 35 (3): 626–637.Google Scholar
McGrane, David. 2016. “From third to first and back to third: The 2015 NDP campaign.” In The Canadian federal election of 2015, edited by Jon H., Pammett and Dornan, Christopher, 85–116. Toronto: Dundurn.Google Scholar
Meléndez, Carlos, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2017. “Political identities: The missing link in the study of populism.” Party Politics 25 (4): 520–533.Google Scholar
Melgar, Pablo. 2019. “El Jair Bolsonaro uruguayo y sus amigos tupamaros.” Perfil, March 13. www.perfil.com/noticias/internacional/el-jair-bolsonaro-uruguayo-y-sus-amigos-tupamaros.phtml. Accessed August 25, 2021.Google Scholar
Mendes, Mariana S., and Dennison, James. 2021. “Explaining the emergence of the radical right in Spain and Portugal: Salience, stigma and supply.” West European Politics 44 (4): 752–775.Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L., Ramos, Jennifer M., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2007. “Crisis, charisma, and consequences: Evidence from the 2004 US presidential election.” The Journal of Politics 69 (1): 30–42.Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2009. Democracy at risk: How terrorist threats affect the public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2011. “The nature, determinants, and consequences of Chávez’s Charisma: Evidence from a study of Venezuelan public opinion.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (1): 28–54.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. 2001. Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Translated by Eden Paul and Cedar Paul. Kitchener, ON: Batoche Books.Google Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., Saunders, Kyle L., and Farhart, Christina E.. 2016. “Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 824–844.Google Scholar
Miller, Steven V. 2020. “Economic anxiety or ethnocentrism? An evaluation of attitudes toward immigration in the U.S. from 1992 to 2016.” The Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1782638.Google Scholar
Minder, Raphael. 2010. “Spain hit by strikes over austerity measures.” New York Times, June 8. www.nytimes.com/2010/06/09/world/europe/09iht-spain.html. Accessed July 20, 2021.Google Scholar
Minder, Raphael. 2017. The struggle for Catalonia: Rebel politics in Spain. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
Monestier, Felipe. 2011. Movimientos sociales, partidos polîtcos y democracia directa desde abajo en Uruguay: 1985–2004. Buenos Aires: CLASCO.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles. 2001. The spirit of the laws. Kitchener, ON: Batoche Books.Google Scholar
Montestier, Felipe, Nocetto, Lihuen, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2021. “Cabildo Abierto: oportunidades y desafíos para la construcción partidaria en un sistema de partidos institucionalizado.” In De la estabilidad al equilibrio inestable: elecciones y comportamiento electoral, edited by Moraes, Juan Andrés and Bentancur, Verónica Pérez. Montevideo: Instituto de Ciencia Política.Google Scholar
Morgan, Stephen L., and Lee, Jiwon. 2018. “Trump voters and the white working class.” Sociological Science 5: 234–245.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2010. “The populist radical right: A pathological normalcy.” West European Politics 33 (6): 1167–1186.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2013a. “Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America.” Government and Opposition 48 (2): 147–174.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2013b. “Populism.” In The Oxford handbook of political ideologies, edited by Freeden, Michael, Tower Sargent, Lyman, and Stears, Marc, 493–512. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2013c. “Populism and (liberal) democracy: A framework for analysis.” In Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy?, edited by Mudde, Cas and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2018. “Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1667–1693.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N., and Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1986. “Rational choice and rebellious collective action.” American Political Science Review 80 (2): 471–488.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2021. Democracy rules. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Muro, Diego, and Vidal, Guillem. 2017. “Political mistrust in southern Europe since the Great Recession.” Mediterranean Politics 22 (2): 197–217.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Bélanger, Éric. 2012. “Economics and elections revisited.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (5): 551–573.Google Scholar
Navarre, Rachel. 2020. “Immigration policy under the Trump administration.” In The future of US empire in the Americas, edited by Gill, Timothy, 307–327. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Navarre, Rachel, Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew, and Utych, Stephen M.. 2020. “Measuring cultural discontent.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Navarre, Rachel, Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew, and Utych, Stephen M.. 2021. “Conspiracies, emotions and populism: What they don’t want you to know.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio. 2019. “Chile’s riots: Frustration at the gate of the promised land.” Americas Quarterly, October 21. www.americasquarterly.org/article/chiles-riots-frustration-at-the-gate-of-the-promised-land/. Accessed July 13, 2021.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio, and Perelló, Lucas. 2019. “One-night stands and long-term commitments: Presidential approval for Sebastián Piñera in Chile, 2009–2014.” Revista de Ciencia Polîtica 39 (1): 49–73.Google Scholar
Neubeck, Kenneth J., and Cazenave, Noel A.. 2001. Welfare racism: Playing the race card against America’s poor. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Craig, Stephen C., and Mattei, Franco. 1991. “Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1407–1413.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, ed. 1999. Critical citizens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ocampo, José Antonio. 2017. “Commodity-led development in Latin America.” In Alternative pathways to sustainable development: Lessons from Latin America, edited by Carbonnier, Gilles, Campodónico, Humberto, and Vázquez, Sergio Tezanos, 51–76. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
OECD. 2022. “Unemployment rate.” Indicator. https://doi.org/10.1787/52570002-en. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
OIG. 2018. Special review: Initial observations regarding family separation issues under the Zero Tolerance Policy. Washington, DC: DHS Office of the Inspector General.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter, Burow-Auffarth, Kate, and Heinrichs, Uwe. 1981. “Conditions for conventional and unconventional political participation: An empirical test of economic and sociological hypotheses.” European Journal of Political Research 9 (2): 147–168.Google Scholar
Orpen, Christopher. 1994. “The effects of self-esteem and personal control on the relationship between job insecurity and psychological well-being.” Social Behavior and Personality 22 (1): 53–56.Google Scholar
Orr, Martin, and Husting, Ginna. 2018. “Media marginalization of racial minorities: Conspiracy theorists in US ghettos and on the Arab street.” Working paper. https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1061&context=sociology_facpubs. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Orriols, Lluis, and Cordero, Guillermo. 2018. “The breakdown of the Spanish two party system: The upsurge of Podemos and Cuidadanos in the 2015 general election.” In Crisis elections, new contenders and government formation: Breaking the mould in southern Europe, edited by Bosco, Anna and Verney, Susannah, 87–110. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., Bartels, Larry M., and Seawright, Jason. 2013. “Democracy and the policy preferences of wealthy Americans.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (1): 51–73.Google Scholar
Panizza, Francisco. 2005. “Introduction: Populism and the mirror of democracy.” In Populism and the mirror of democracy, edited by Panizza, Francisco, 1–31. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Parkin, Andrew. 2021. Support for democracy in Canada. Toronto: Environics Institute.Google Scholar
Pastine, Ivan, Pastine, Tuvana, and Redmond, Paul. 2014. “Incumbent-quality advantage and counterfactual electoral stagnation in the US Senate.” Politics 35 (1): 32–45.Google Scholar
Patenaude, III, Willis. 2019. “Modern American populism: Analyzing the economics behind the ‘silent majority,’ the Tea Party, and Trumpism.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 78 (3): 787–834.Google Scholar
Pérez Bentancur, Verónica, Piñeiro Rodríguez, Rafael, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2018. “Efficacy and the reproduction of political engagement: Evidence from the Broad Front in Uruguay.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (6): 838–867.Google Scholar
Pérez Bentancur, Verónica, Piñeiro Rodríguez, Rafael, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2019. How party activism survives: Uruguay’s Frente Amplio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez Bentancur, Verónica, Piñeiro Rodríguez, Rafael, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2020. “Efficacy and the reproduction of political activism: Evidence from the broad front in Uruguay.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (6): 838–867.Google Scholar
Peterson-Withorn, Chase. 2019. “Michael Cohen says Trump ran for president as a ‘marketing opportunity.’ If so, it isn’t working.” Forbes, February 27. www.forbes.com/sites/chasewithorn/2019/02/27/michael-cohen-says-trump-ran-for-president-as-a-marketing-opportunity-if-so-it-isnt-working/?sh=65776c52ade0. Accessed September 3, 2021.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F., Christ, Oliver, Wagner, Ulrich, and Stellmacher, Jost. 2007. “Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 31 (4): 411–425.Google Scholar
Pharr, Susan, and Putnam, Robert D., eds. 2000. Disaffected democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2018. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piñeiro, Rafael, Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2016. “The engagement curve: Populism and political engagement in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 51 (4): 3–23.Google Scholar
Plotke, David. 1997. “Representation is democracy.” Constellations 4 (1): 19–34.Google Scholar
Politico. 2018. “Full text: Trump’s executive order ending family separations.” Politico, June 20. www.politico.com/story/2018/06/20/full-text-trump-executive-order-family-separations-transcript-658639. Accessed September 16, 2021.Google Scholar
Prebisch, Raul. 1962. “The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems.” Economic Bulletin for Latin America 7 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limongi, Fernando. 1997. “Modernization: Theories and facts.” World Politics 49 (2): 155–183.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Pytlik, Nico, Soll, Daniel, and Mehl, Stephanie. 2020. “Thinking preferences and conspiracy belief: Intuitive thinking and the jumping to conclusions-bias as a basis for the belief in conspiracy theories.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 11 (987). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.568942.Google Scholar
Qin, Xin, Ren, Run, Zhang, Zhi-Xue, and Johnson, Russel E.. 2015. “Fairness heuristics and substitutability effects: Inferring the fairness of outcomes, procedures and interpersonal treatment when employees lack clear information.” Journal of Applied Psychology 100 (3): 749–766.Google Scholar
Quadagno, Jill S. 1994. The color of welfare: How racism undermined the war on poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quattrone, George A., and Tversky, Amos. 1988. “Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice.” American Political Science Review 82 (3): 719–736.Google Scholar
Quintas da Silva, Rodrigo. 2018. “A Portuguese exception to right-wing populism.” Palgrave Communications 4 (7).Google Scholar
Rama, José, Zanotti, Lisa, Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J., and Santana, Andrés. 2021. VOX: The rise of the Spanish populist radical right. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reise, Steven P., Moore, Tyler M., and Haviland, Mark G.. 2010. “Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.” Journal of Personality Assessment 92 (6): 544–559.Google Scholar
Rennó, Lucio. 2020. “The Bolsonaro voter: Issue positions and vote choice in the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections.” Latin American Politics and Society 62 (4): 1–23.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2012. “Timeline: Spain’s economic crisis.” Reuters, March 29. www.reuters.com/article/us-spain-strike-economy/timeline-spains-economic-crisis-idUSBRE82S0L420120329. Accessed July 20, 2021.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew. 2012. “Participation paradoxes: Voting, contention and support for democracy.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew. 2015. “Participatory populism: Theory and evidence from Bolivarian Venezuela.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (3): 415–427.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew. 2017a. “Beyond the balance sheet: Performance, participation and regime support in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 49 (2): 252–286.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew. 2017b. “Participatory governance in Latin America: Promises and limitations.” Latin American Politics and Society 59 (3): 122–131.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew. 2017c. Regime support beyond the balance sheet: Participation and policy performance in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew. 2021a. “I am your voice! Populism and external efficacy.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew. 2021b. “Lock them up! Punitive aggression and populism as political vigilantism.” Electoral Studies 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102415.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew. 2021c. “Procedures matter: Strong voice, evaluations of policy performance, and regime support.” Political Studies 69 (2): 412–433.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew, and Madrid, Raúl L. 2020. “The perils of personalism.” Democratization 27 (2): 321–339.Google Scholar
Rhodes–Purdy, Matthew, Navarre, Rachel, and Utych, Stephen M.. 2020. The Political Systems Attitudes Study (PSAS) – Pilot Wave. v03062020. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMNLTA.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew, Navarre, Rachel, and Utych, Stephen M.. 2021a. “Measuring simultaneous emotions: Existing problems and a new way forward.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 8 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew, Navarre, Rachel, and Utych, Stephen M.. 2021b. “Populist psychology: Economics, culture, and emotions.” Journal of Politics 83 (4): 1559–1572.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2021. “Raising the red flag: Democratic elitism and the protests in Chile.” Perspectives on Politics: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721000050.Google Scholar
Rico, Guillem, and Liñeira, Robert. 2014. “Bringing secessionism into the mainstream: The 2012 regional election in Catalonia.” South European Society and Politics 19 (2): 257–280.Google Scholar
Rihoux, Benoit, and Ragin, Charles, eds. 2009. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1988. Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Robb, Amanda. 2017. “Anatomy of a fake news scandal.” Rolling Stone, November 16. www.rollingstone.com/feature/anatomy-of-a-fake-news-scandal-125877/. Accessed September 5, 2021.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1998. Deepening democracy? The modern left and social movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2006. “Populism, political conflict, and grass-roots organization in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 38 (2): 127–148.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2015. “Populism, political mobilizations, and crises of political representation.” In The promise and perils of populism: Global perspectives, edited by de la Torre, Carlos, 140–158. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2017. “State of the field.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (2): 218–233.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2019. “Bipolar disorders: Varieties of capitalism and populist out-flanking on the left and right.” Polity 51 (4): 641–653.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2018. “Populism and the economics of globalization.” Journal of International Business Party 1 (2): 12–33.Google Scholar
Rooduijn, Matthijs, Stijn, van Kessel, Froio, Caterina, Andrea, Pirro, Lange, Sarah de, Daphne Halikiopoulou, Paul Lewis, Mudde, Cas, and Taggart, Paul. 2019. The PopuList: An overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe. www.popu-list.org/. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Roseman, Ira J. 1996. “Appraisal determinants of emotions: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory.” Cognition and Emotion 10 (3): 241–278.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2018. Party vibrancy and democracy in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2021. Interviewed by Matthew Rhodes-Purdy.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L. and Muirhead, Russell. 2019. A lot of people are saying: The new conspiracism and the assault on democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances, and Shapiro, Ian. 2018. Responsible parties: Saving democracy from itself. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Jonathan T., and Diego-Rosell, Pablo. 2016. “Explaining nationalist political views: The case of Donald Trump.” SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2822059. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2015. “Explaining the emergence of populism in Europe and the Americas.” In The Promise and Perils of Populism, edited by Torre, Carlos de la, 189–227. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
RTVE.es. 2019. “Un millón de votantes de Cs se fueron a la abstención y 233.000 del PSOE se pasaron a Vox, según una encuesta.” RTVE, November 18. www.rtve.es/noticias/20191118/encuesta-gad3-millon-votantes-ciudadanos-se-fueron-abstencion-10n/1991407.shtml. Accessed August 25, 2021.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne, and Stephens, John. 1992. Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rydgren, Jens. 2005. Movements of exclusion: Radical right-wing populism in the Western world. New York: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
Saad-Filho, Alfredo. 2013. “Mass protests under ‘left neoliberalism’: Brazil, June–July 2013.” Critical Sociology 39 (5): 657–669.Google Scholar
Samuels, David, and Zucco, Cesar. 2018. Partisans, antipartisans, and nonpartisans: Voting behavior in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept misformation in comparative politics.” American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033–1053.Google Scholar
Scala, Dante J., and Johnson, Kenneth M.. 2017. “Political polarization along the rural–urban continuum? The geography of the presidential vote, 2000–2016.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 672 (1): 162–184.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Armin. 2021. “Cultural backlash? How (not) to explain the rise of authoritarian populism.” British Journal of Political Science: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000363.Google Scholar
Schonfeld, Irvin Sam, and Mazzola, Joseph J.. 2015. “A qualitative study of stress in individuals self-employed in solo businesses.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 20 (4): 501–513.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 2008. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy, 3rd edition. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Norbert, and Clore, Gerald L.. 1983. “Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (3): 513.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Norbert, Strack, Fritz, Kommer, Detlev, and Wagner, Dirk. 1987. “Soccer, rooms, and the quality of your life: Mood effects on judgments of satisfaction with life in general and with specific domains.” European Journal of Social Psychology 17 (1): 69–79.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 2008. Weapons of the weak. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1999. “Evidence of the long-term persistence of adults’ political predispositions.” The Journal of Politics 61 (1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason. 2012. Party-system collapse: The roots of crisis in Peru and Venezuela. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Shelbourne, Mallory. 2018. “Trump’s infrastructure plan hits a dead end.” The Hill, May 17. https://thehill.com/policy/transportation/388071-trumps-infrastructure-plan-hits-a-dead-end. Accessed September 4, 2021.Google Scholar
Shiller, Robert J. 2020. Narrative economics: How stories go viral and drive major economic events. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shilts, Randy. 1982. The mayor of Castro Street. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter M. 2016. “Crisis of representation in Chile? The institutional connection.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 8 (3): 61–93.Google Scholar
Sibbel, Lejo. 2007. “Linking trade with labour rights: The ILO Garment Sector Working Conditions Improvement Project in Cambodia.” Arizona Journal of International And Comparative Law 24 (1): 235–249.Google Scholar
Sides, John, Tesler, Michael, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2017. “The 2016 US election: How Trump lost and won.” Journal of Democracy 28 (2): 34–44.Google Scholar
Sides, John, Tesler, Michael, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2018. “Hunting where the ducks are: Activating support for Donald Trump in the 2016 Republican primary.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28 (2): 135–156.Google Scholar
Sides, John, Tesler, Michael, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2019. Identity crisis: The 2016 presidential campaign and the battle for the meaning of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Patricio. 1991. “Technocrats and politics in Chile: From the Chicago boys to the CIEPLAN monks.” Journal of Latin American Studies 23 (2): 385–410.Google Scholar
Simón, Pablo. 2016. “The challenges of the new Spanish multipartism: Government formation failure and the 2016 general election.” South European Society and Politics 21 (4): 493–517.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Williamson, Vanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the remaking of Republican conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slothuus, Rune. 2016. “Assessing the influence of political parties on public opinion: The challenge from pretreatment effects.” Political Communication 33 (2): 302–327.Google Scholar
Smith, Craig A., and Ellsworth, Phoebe C.. 1985. “Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (4): 813.Google Scholar
Sobolewska, Maria, and Ford, Robert. 2020. Brexitland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Somma, Nicolás M., Bargsted, Matías, Disi Pavlic, Rodolfo, and Medel, Rodrigo M.. 2021. “No water in the oasis: The Chilean spring of 2019–2020.” Social Movement Studies 20 (4): 495–502.Google Scholar
Spalding, Hobart A. Jr. 1977. Organized labor in Latin America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Spring, Marianna, and Wendling, Mike. 2020. “How Covid-19 myths are merging with QAnon conspiracy theory.” BBC News, September 3. www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-53997203. Accessed September 19, 2021.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Bram, Keppens, Gil, and van Droogenbroeck, Filip. 2016. “Who supports populism and what attracts people to it?” Political Research Quarterly 69 (2): 335–346.Google Scholar
Stefani, Silvia. 2021. “Building mistrust: ‘Minha Casa Minha Vida’ and its political effects in Rio de Janeiro.” Bulletin of Latin American Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13261.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges, and Hunter, Wendy. 2013. “Whither clientelism? Good governance and Brazil’s Bolsa Família program.” Comparative Politics 46 (1): 43–62.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., and Vermeule, Adrian. 2009. “Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 202–227.Google Scholar
Taggart, Paul. 2000. Populism. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, Turner, John C., Austin, William G., and Worchel, Stephen. 1979. “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict.” Organizational Identity: A Reader, edited by Hatch, Mary Jo and Schultz, Majken, 56–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2000. “Mad cows and social activists: Contentious politics in the trilateral democracies.” In Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? edited by Pharr, Susan and Robert, D. Putnam, 270–290. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1994. Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Washington, DC: ERIC.Google Scholar
Teles, Miguel Galvão. 1998. “A segunda plataforma de acordo constitucional entre o Movimento das Forças Armadas e os partidos políticos.” Perspectivas Constitucionais 20: 54–69.Google Scholar
Teney, Céline, Promise Lacewell, Onawa, and De Wilde, Pieter. 2014. “Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: Attitudes and ideologies.” European Political Science Review 6 (4): 575–595.Google Scholar
Tesler, Michael. 2016. Post-racial or most-racial? Race and politics in the Obama era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thibaut, John, and Walker, Laurens. 1975. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Thompson, Derek. 2016. “Who are Donald Trump’s supporters, really?” The Atlantic, 1 March.Google Scholar
Torcal, Mariano. 2014. “The decline of political trust in Spain and Portugal: Economic performance or political responsiveness?” American Behavioral Scientist 58 (12): 1542–1567.Google Scholar
Torcal, Mariano. 2019. “¿Ideología, nacionalismo español o inmigración? Las claves del voto a la ultraderecha.” Contexto y Acción, November 11. https://ctxt.es/es/20191120/Politica/29662/Mariano-Torcal-ultraderecha-ideologia-nacionalismo-inmigracion-Vox.htm. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested games. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1995. “Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 289–325.Google Scholar
Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J. 2019. “Explaining the end of Spanish exceptionalism and electoral support for Vox.” Research & Politics 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019851680.Google Scholar
Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J., Rama, José, and Santana, Andrés. 2020. “The Baskerville’s dog suddenly started barking: Voting for VOX in the 2019 Spanish general elections.” Political Research Exchange 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2020.1781543.Google Scholar
Uscinski, Joseph E., Klofstad, Casey, and Atkinson, Matthew D.. 2016. “What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (1): 57–71.Google Scholar
Uscinski, Joseph E., and Parent, Joseph M. 2014. American conspiracy theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Utych, Stephen M., Navarre, Rachel, and Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew. 2021. “Fear or loathing? The affective political economy of prejudice.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2021.32.Google Scholar
Utych, Stephen M., Navarre, Rachel, and Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew. 2022. “White identity, anti-elitism, and opposition to COVID-19 restrictions in the United States.” Representation 58 (2): 301–310.Google Scholar
Vampa, Davide. 2020. “Competing forms of populism and territorial politics: The cases of Vox and Podemos in Spain.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 28 (3): 304–321.Google Scholar
Van den Bos, Kees, Lind, E. Allen, and Wilke, Henk A. M.. 2001. “The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory.” In Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice, edited by Cropanzano, Russell, 49–66. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, Jan-Willem. 2017. The moral punishment instinct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Prooijen, Jan-Willem. 2018. The psychology of conspiracy theories. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vasilopoulos, Pavlos, Marcus, George E., Valentino, Nicholas A., and Foucault, Martial. 2018. “Fear, anger, and voting for the far right: Evidence from the November 13, 2015 Paris terror attacks.” Political Psychology 40 (4): 679–704.Google Scholar
Vasilopoulos, Pavlos, Marcus, George E., Valentino, Nicholas, and Foucault, Martial. 2019. “Anger mediates the effects of fear on support for the far right: A rejoinder.” Political Psychology 40 (4): 713–717.Google Scholar
Volkens, Andrea, Burst, Tobias, Matthieß, Theres, and Zehnter, Lisa. 2020. Manifesto Project dataset. https://doi.org/10.25522/MANIFESTO.MPDS.2020B. Accessed 7/22/2022Google Scholar
Walker, Jan. 2001. Control and the psychology of health: Theory, measurement and applications. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2007. Participatory budgeting in Brazil. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2015. Activating democracy in Brazil: Popular participation, social justice, and interlocking institutions. South Bend, IL: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Amy B. 2017. “Did the 2011 White House correspondents’ dinner spur Trump to run for president?” Chicago Tribune, February 26. www.chicagotribune.com/nation-world/ct-white-house-correspondents-dinner-trump-20170226-story.html. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Watson, David, Anna Clark, Lee, and Tellegen, Auke. 1988. “Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (6): 1063–1070.Google Scholar
Watson, Katy. 2020. “Chile’s choice: Out with the old, in with the new?” BBC News, October 24. www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-54643589. Accessed July 13, 2021.Google Scholar
Weaver, Matthew. 2010. “Angela Merkel: German multiculturalism has ‘utterly failed’.” The Guardian, October 17. www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/17/angela-merkel-german-multiculturalism-failed. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Webber, Jude. 2018. “Mexico‘s López Obrador vows to end neo-liberalism in inauguration.” Financial Times, December 2. www.ft.com/content/fdb0c912-f3a6-11e8-ae55-df4bf40f9d0d. Accessed September 12, 2021.Google Scholar
Werner, Anika, Promise Lacewell, Onawa, and Volkens, Andrea. 2015. Manifesto Project coding instructions, 5th edition. Berlin: Manifesto Project.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1996. “Risk taking in Latin American economic restructuring: Lessons from prospect theory.” International Studies Quarterly 40 (2): 185–207.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1999. “Neoliberal populism in Latin America and eastern Europe.” Comparative Politics 31 (4): 379–401.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2001. “Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics.” Comparative Politics 34 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2017. “A political-strategic approach.” In The Oxford handbook of populism, edited by Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre, 48–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt, and Madrid, Raúl L.. 2019. When democracy trumps populism: European and Latin American lessons for the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, Robert W. 1959. “Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.” Psychological Review 66 (5): 297–333.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F. and Sanders, David. 2014. “British Election Study, 2010: Face-to-face survey.” UK Data Archive, Colchester.Google Scholar
Williams, Joan C. 2019. White working class: Overcoming class cluelessness in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Vanessa. 2013. “The Tea Party and the shift to ‘austerity by gridlock’ in the United States.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Williamson, Vanessa, Skocpol, Theda, and Coggin, John. 2011. “The Tea Party and the remaking of republican conservatism.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 25–43.Google Scholar
Wilson, Trevor. 2011. The downfall of the Liberal Party, 1914–1935. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Winter, Brian. 2017. “Revisiting Brazil’s 2013 protests: What did they really mean.” Americas Quarterly. www.americasquarterly.org/article/revisiting-brazils-2013-protests-what-did-they-really-mean/. Accessed July 22, 2022.Google Scholar
Winthrop, Rebecca. 2020. The need for civic education in 21st-century schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Woodward, Bob. 2021. Rage. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Wright, Stephen C., Aron, Arthur, McLaughlin-Volpe, Tracy, and Ropp, Stacy A.. 1997. “The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (1): 73–90.Google Scholar
Wuttke, Alexander, Schimpf, Christian, and Schoen, Harald. 2020. “When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts: On the conceptualization and measurement of populist attitudes and other multidimensional constructs.” American Political Science Review 114 (2): 356–374.Google Scholar
Ybarra, Vickie D., Sanchez, Lisa M., and Sanchez, Gabriel R.. 2016. “Anti-immigrant anxieties in state policy: The great recession and punitive immigration policy in the American states, 2005–2012.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16 (3): 313–339.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zarzalejos, Javier. 2016. “Populism in Spain: An analysis of Podemos.” European View 15 (2): 183–191.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×