Advancing Women's Health Through Medical Education A Systems Approach in Family Planning and Abortion
Book contents
- Advancing Women’s Health Through Medical Education
- Reviews
- Advancing Women’s Health Through Medical Education
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Section I Abortion Training: Workforce, Leadership, Social & Political Impact
- Chapter 1 A Systems Approach to Medical Education
- Chapter 2 Training in Contraception and Abortion to Reduce Maternal Mortality
- Chapter 3 The History of Integrated Training in Abortion and Contraception for Obstetrician-Gynecologists in the USA
- Chapter 4 The Medical Community, Abortion and the Crucial Role of Physician Advocacy
- Chapter 5 The US Fellowship in Family Planning as a Community of Practice
- Chapter 6 Building Evidence through Research
- Chapter 7 Impact of Integrated Family Planning Training
- Chapter 8 Conscientious Provision and Objection in Medical Training in the Context of the Abortion Controversy
- Section II Integration of Abortion into Graduate Medical Education
- Section III Family Planning Curricular Design & Implementation
- Section IV Reproductive Health Services & Abortion Training: Global Examples
- Index
- References
Chapter 8 - Conscientious Provision and Objection in Medical Training in the Context of the Abortion Controversy
from Section I - Abortion Training: Workforce, Leadership, Social & Political Impact
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2021
Book contents
- Advancing Women’s Health Through Medical Education
- Reviews
- Advancing Women’s Health Through Medical Education
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Section I Abortion Training: Workforce, Leadership, Social & Political Impact
- Chapter 1 A Systems Approach to Medical Education
- Chapter 2 Training in Contraception and Abortion to Reduce Maternal Mortality
- Chapter 3 The History of Integrated Training in Abortion and Contraception for Obstetrician-Gynecologists in the USA
- Chapter 4 The Medical Community, Abortion and the Crucial Role of Physician Advocacy
- Chapter 5 The US Fellowship in Family Planning as a Community of Practice
- Chapter 6 Building Evidence through Research
- Chapter 7 Impact of Integrated Family Planning Training
- Chapter 8 Conscientious Provision and Objection in Medical Training in the Context of the Abortion Controversy
- Section II Integration of Abortion into Graduate Medical Education
- Section III Family Planning Curricular Design & Implementation
- Section IV Reproductive Health Services & Abortion Training: Global Examples
- Index
- References
Summary
Conscientious objection to sexual and reproductive healthcare (refusal to perform abortion, assisted reproductive technologies, prenatal diagnosis, contraception, including emergency contraception and sterilization, care for trans people etc.) has become a widespread global phenomenon and constitutes a barrier to these services for many.The tension between honoring one’s own integrity and respecting others’ rights to differ, and to have access to legal services, is further complicated for clinicians who have fiduciary duties to put patients’ needs ahead of their own.Medical and residency education must reconcile the right to conscience of students and residents with the need to ensure that these students and residents are well trained, able to demonstrate competency in all the components of their profession and specialty and clear about their fiduciary duties
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Advancing Women's Health Through Medical EducationA Systems Approach in Family Planning and Abortion, pp. 94 - 100Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted December 16, 1966, G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), U.N. GAOR, 21st Sess., Supp. No. 16, at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171 (entered into force March 23, 1976).Google Scholar
Chavkin, W, Abu-Odeh, D, Clune-Taylor, C, Dubow, S, Ferber, M, Meyer, IH. Balancing freedom of conscience and equitable access. Am J Public Health. 2018;108:1487–1488.Google Scholar
Chavkin, W, Leitman, L, Polin, K. Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: a white paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses. Int J of Gynecol and Obstet. 2013;123(S3):S41–S56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavkin, W, Swerdlow, L, Fifield, J. Regulation of conscientious objection to abortion. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19(1):55–68.Google Scholar
Melling, L, Lim, M, Brighouse, R, Aviv, NM. Drawing the line: tackling tensions between religious freedom and equality. International Network of Civil Liberties Organizations; 2015. www.cels.org.ar/common/documentos/DrawingtheLine.pdfGoogle Scholar
Raifman, J, Galea, S. The new US “Conscience and Religious Freedom Division”: imposing religious beliefs on others. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(7):889–890.Google Scholar
US Department of the Interior. Basic obligation of public service. www.doi.gov/ethics/basic-obligations-of-public-service. Accessed September 26, 2019.Google Scholar
California Senate Bill 277: An Act to Amend Sections 120325, 120335, 120370, and 120375 of, to Add Section 120338 to, and to Repeal Section 120365 of, the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Public Health; 2015. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB277Google Scholar
New York State Senate Bill S2994A: An Act to Amend the Public Health Law, in Relation to Exemptions from Vaccination Due to Religious Beliefs; to Repeal Subdivision 9 of Section 2164 of the Public Health Law, Relating to Exemption from Vaccination Due to Religious Beliefs; and Providing for the Repeal of Certain Provisions upon Expiration Thereof; 2019. www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/s2994Google Scholar
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Adopted 1964. www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/. Accessed September 26, 2019.Google Scholar
FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. Ethical guidelines on conscientious objection. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;92(3):333–334.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Ethics. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 385: The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine; 2007 (reaffirmed 2019). www.acog.org/Clinical-Guidance-and-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Ethics/The-Limits-of-Conscientious-Refusal-in-Reproductive-Medicine. Accessed September 26, 2019.Google Scholar
Zampas, C, Andion-Ibaniez, X. Conscientious objection to sexual and reproductive health services: international human rights standards and European law and practice. Eur J Health Law. 2012;19:231–256.Google Scholar
De Zordo, S, Mishtal, J. Physicians and abortion: provision, political participation and conflicts on the ground – the cases of Brazil and Poland. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(Suppl 3):S32–S36.Google Scholar
Charo, RA. Health care provider refusals to treat, prescribe, refer or inform: professionalism and conscience. Journal ACS Issue Groups. 2007:119–135.Google Scholar
Steinauer, J, Koenemann, K, Coghlan, K, Landy, U, Turk, J. Impact of Ryan Program on resident clinical experience and plans to include abortion in future practice. ePoster presented at the ACOG Annual Clinical Meeting, Nashville, TN; 2019.Google Scholar
Steinauer, JE, Turk, JK, Fulton, MC, Simonson, KH, Landy, U. The benefits of family planning training: a 10-year review of the Ryan Residency Training Program. Contraception. 2013;88(2):275–280. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.02.006Google Scholar
Harris, LH, Cooper, A, Rasinski, KA, Curlin, FA, Lyerly, AD. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ objections to and willingness to help patients obtain an abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(4):905–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, JE. Conscientious refusal in family medicine residency training. Fam Med. 2011;43(5):330–333.Google Scholar
Srinivasulu, S, Maldonado, L, Prine, L, Rubin, SE. Intention to provide abortion upon completing family medicine residency and subsequent abortion provision: a 5-year follow-up survey. Contraception. 2019:100(3):188–192.Google Scholar
Kavanaugh, J. What should we teach medical students about abortion. June 4, 2019, webinar.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. Abortion care: reforming the undergraduate medical curriculum. Paper presented at the meeting of the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, RCOG, 2019.Google Scholar
Stulberg, DB, Dude, AM, Dahlquist, I, Curlin, FA. Obstetrician-gynecologists, religious institutions, and conflicts regarding patient-care policies. Amer J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):73–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norwegian Directorate of Health. Specialist training and authorization for doctors: gynecology. www.helsedirektoratet.no/tema/autorisasjon-og-spesialistutdanning/spesialistutdanning-for-leger/fodselshjelp-og-kvinnesykdommer/laeringsmal?query=gynekologi. Accessed September 26, 2019.Google Scholar