Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:21:07.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2017

Dragoş Iliescu
Dragoş Iliescu
Affiliation:
University of Bucharest
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Adapting Tests in Linguistic and Cultural Situations , pp. 621 - 630
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaronson, N. K., Acquadro, C., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., Bucquet, D., Bullinger, M., Bungay, K., Fukuhara, S., Gandek, B., Keller, S., Razavi, D., Sanson-Fisher, R., Sullivan, M., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Wagner, A., & Ware, J. E. (1992). International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Quality of Life Research, 1, 349–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abedi, J. (2013). Testing of English language learner students. In Geisinger, K. (Ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (vol. 3) pp. 355–368. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Aday, L. A., Chiu, G. Y., & Anderson, R. (1980). Methodological issues in health care surveys of the Spanish heritage population. American Journal of Public Health, 70, 367–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2005). CAHPS guidelines for assessing and selecting translators and reviewers (Final draft January 2005). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved on August 20, 2016 from www.ahrq.gov/cahps/surveys-guidance/helpful-resources/resources/cahpsguidelines_translation.html.Google Scholar
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2016). Guidelines for Translating CAHPS Surveys (Content last reviewed March 2016). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved on August 20, 2016 from www.ahrq.gov/cahps/surveys-guidance/helpful-resources/resources/cahpsguidelines_translation.html.Google Scholar
Aguilar, A., Tous, J. M., & Pueyo, A. A. (1990). Adaptacion y estudio psicometrico del EPQ-R. Anuario de Psicologia, 46, 101–118.Google Scholar
Alario, F. X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 531–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albu, M., & Pitariu, H. D. (1991). Algoritm de construire a unei scale pentru un test psihologic: Contribuții la reproiectarea scalei F/M a inventarului psihologic California [An algorithm for the construction of a scales for a psychological test: contributions to a redesign of the F/M scale of the California Psychological Inventory]. Psihologie-Pedagogie, 36(2), 30–35.Google Scholar
Albu, M., & Pitariu, H. D. (1999). Evaluarea anxietății cu ajutorul Inventarului Psihologic California [Anxiety Assessment with the California Psychological Inventory]. Studii de Psihologie, 4, 19–32.Google Scholar
Allalouf, A., Bastari, B., Hambleton, R. K., & Sireci, S. G. (1997). Comparing the dimensionality of a test administered in two languages. Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative research report no. 319. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.Google Scholar
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1994). Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ, 308(6943), 1552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aluja, A., Garcia, O., Garcia, L. F., & Seisdedos, N. (2005). Invariance of the NEO-PI-R structure across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1879–1889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Association for Mental Retardation. (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (9th ed.). Washington, DC: AAMR.Google Scholar
American Association for Mental Retardation. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support. Washington, DC: AAMR.Google Scholar
American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (2014). Standards for Education and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Anderson, N., Schlueter, J. E., Carlson, J. F., & Geisinger, K. F. (Eds.) (2016). Tests in Print IX: An index to tests, test reviews, and the literature on specific tests. Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. T., Aaronson, N. K., & Wilkin, D. (1993). Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 2, 369–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In Thorndike, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 508–600). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Angoff, W. H. (1972). A technique for the investigation of cultural differences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 069686.Google Scholar
Angoff, W. H. (1993). Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. In Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 3–23). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Applegate, A., & Applegate, M. (2004). The Peter Effect: Reading habits and attitudes of preservice teachers. The Reading Teacher, 57, 554–563.Google Scholar
Applegate, A., & Applegate, M., (2014). The Peter Effect revisited: Reading habits and attitudes of college students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 53(3), 188–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arends-Toth, J. V., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2007). Cultural and gender differences in gender-role beliefs, sharing household-task and child-care responsibilities, and well-being among immigrants and majority members in the Netherlands. Sex Roles, 57(11–12), 813–824.Google Scholar
Arends-Toth, J. V., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2009). Cultural differences in family, marital, and gender-role values among immigrants and majority members in the Netherlands. International Journal of Psychology, 44(3), 161–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asparouhov, T., Muthen, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: Comments on Stromeyer et al. Journal of Management, 41, 1561–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auslander, P. (1998). Seeing is believing: Live performance and the discourse of authenticity in rock culture. Literature and Psychology, 44(4), 1–26.Google Scholar
Austin, P. C. (2008). A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 2037–2049.Google Scholar
Austin, P. C. (2009). Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: Results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biometrical Journal, 51(1), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azuma, H., & Kashiwagi, K. (1987). Descriptors for an intelligent person: A Japanese study. Japanese Psychological Research, 29, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, J. G., & O’Malley, P. M. (1984). Yea-saying, nay-saying and going to extremes: Black-white differences in response styles. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Short-term phonological memory and long-term learning: A single case study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailin, A., & Grafstein, A. (2001). The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae: A critique. Language and Communication, 21(3), 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A. (2012). Cross-cultural variance of schizophrenia in symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Georgetown University Journal of Health Sciences, 6(2), 18–24.Google Scholar
Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, K. (2006). A comprehensive framework for evaluating hypotheses about cultural bias in educational testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 19(2), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-On, R. (1997). Emotional quotient inventory - A measure of emotional intelligence: Technical manual. Toronto, ON: MHS.Google Scholar
Barrett, P. T. (2010) Test reliability and validity: The inappropriate use of the Pearson and other variance ratio coefficients for indexing reliability and validity. Technical Whitepaper #9. Downloaded from www.pbarrett.net.Google Scholar
Barrett, P., & Rolland, J.-P. (2009). The meta-analytic correlation between two Big Five factors: Something is not quite right in the woodshed. Strategic Whitepaper #3. Retrieved August 8, 2016 from www.pbarrett.net/stratpapers/metacorr.pdf.Google Scholar
Barry, C. L., Horst, S. J., Finney, S. J., Brown, A. R., & Kopp, J. P. (2010). Do examinees have similar test-taking effort? A high-stakes question for low-stakes testing. International Journal of Testing, 10(4), 342–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartram, D. (2002a). EFPA Review Model for the description and evaluation of psychological instruments: Version 3.2. Evaluation Form. Brussels: EFPA Standing Committee on Tests and Testing (September, 2002).Google Scholar
Bartram, D. (2002b). EFPA Review Model for the description and evaluation of psychological instruments: Version 3.2. Notes for Reviewers. Brussels: EFPA Standing Committee on Tests and Testing (September, 2002).Google Scholar
Bartram, D. (2007). Increasing validity with forced-choice criterion measurement formats. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartram, D. (2008). Global norms: Towards some guidelines for aggregating personality norms across countries. International Journal of Testing, 8, 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartram, D. (2016). Norming. In Leong, F. T. L., Bartram, D., Cheung, F. M., Geisinger, K. F., & Iliescu, D. (2016). The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 438–448). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, L. J., & Adair, G. E. (1992). The use of ethnographic interviewing to inform questionnaire construction. Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter, A. J., Scott, K. M., Vos, T., & Whiteford, H. A. (2013). Global prevalence of anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-regression. Psychological Medicine, 43(5), 897–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales for Infant and Toddler Development. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar
Beatty, P. (2004). The dynamics of cognitive interviewing. In Presser, S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M., Lessler, J., Martin, E., Martin, J. & Singer, E. (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 45–66). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, P., & Willis, G. (2007). The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 288–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, P., Willis, G. B., & Schechter, S. (1997). Evaluating the generalizability of cognitive interview findings. In Office of management and budget seminar on statistical methodology in the public service, statistical policy working paper 26, (353–362). Washington, DC: Statistical Policy Office.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(6), 561–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedard-Gilligan, M., Jaeger, J., Echiverri-Cohen, A., & Zoellner, L. A. (2011). Individual differences in trauma disclosure. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43(2), 716–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belk, R. W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belson, W. (1981). The design and understanding of survey questions. London: Gower.Google Scholar
Benet-Martinez, V. (2007). Cross-cultural personality research: Conceptual and methodological issues. In Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C. & Krueger, R. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 170–189). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (2000). Toward the development of quasi-indigenous personality constructs: Measuring Los Cinco Grandes in Spain with indigenous Castilian markers. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(1), 141–157.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1990). On the equivalence of factors and components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Kressel, S., Pollard, W. E., Gilson, B. S., & Morris, J. R. (1976). The Sickness Impact Profile: Conceptual foundation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. International Journal of Health Services, 6(3), 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability, International Journal of Psychology, 4, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologen und Psychologinnen (BDP) (2004). English version of the Deutsches Institut fur Norming (2002) DIN 33430: Requirements for proficiency assessment procedures and their implementation. Berlin: Association of German Professional Psychologists.Google Scholar
Bhatnagar, K., & Frank, J. (1997). Psychiatric disorders in elderly from the Indian sub-continent living in Bradford. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12(9), 907–912.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BICSE [Board on International Comparative Studies in Education Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council] (1995). International comparative studies in education: Description of selected large-scale assessments and case studies. Washington, DC: BICSE.Google Scholar
Billiet, J. B., & McClendon, M. J. (1998). On the identification of acquiescence in balanced sets of items using structural models. In Ferligoj, A. (Ed.): Advances in methodology, data analysis and statistics. Ljubljana: FDV.Google Scholar
Billiet, J. B., & McClendon, M. J. (2000). Modeling acquiescence in measurement models for two balanced sets of items. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 608–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bischoping, K., & Dykema, J. (1999). Towards a social psychological program for improving focus group methods of developing questionnaires. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 495–516.Google Scholar
Björner, J. B., Kreiner, S., Ware, J. W., Damsgaard, M. T., & Bech, P. (1998). Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1189–1202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjornsson, C. H. (1968). Lasbarhet. Liber: Stockholm.Google Scholar
Blair, J., & Presser, S. (1993). Survey procedures for conducting cognitive interviews to pretest questionnaires: A review of theory and practice. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods of the American Statistical Association, 370–375. Retrieved on June 19, 2016 from www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/papers.Google Scholar
Block, J. (2010). The five factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, P. K. (2000). Culture and personality revisited. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockenholt, U. (2004). Comparative judgments as an alternative to ratings: Identifying the scale origin. Psychological Methods, 9, 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boiger, M., & Mesquita, B. (2012). The construction of emotion in interactions, relationships, and cultures. Emotion Review, 4(3), 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, M. H. (2000). Localizing the imperial outreach: The Big Five and more in Chinese culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213–266). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1990). Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A study on the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkenau, P., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on observed personality: Evidence from the German observational study of adult twins. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 635–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borman, W. C. (1991). Job behavior, performance, and effectiveness. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 271–326). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Borman, W. C., Hedge, J. W., Ferstl, K. L., Kaufman, J. D., Farmer, W. L., & Bearden, R. M. (2003). Current directions and issues in personnel selection and classification. In Martocchio, J. J. & Gerris, G. R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (vol. 22). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Born, M. (2012, July). Validity of CPAI-2 and HEXACO among Chinese-Dutch and indigenous Dutch students. Presented at the 8th Conference of the International Test Commission, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (1969). Personality, problem-solving procedure, and performance in small groups. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 53, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracken, B. A., & Barona, A. (1991). State of the art procedures for translating, validating and using psychoeducational tests in cross-cultural assessment. School Psychology International, 12, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgeman, B. (2004, April). Speededness as a threat to construct validity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA. Retrieved Oct. 19, 2004, from the ETS Website: www.ets.org/research/dload/NCME_2004-Bridgeman.pdf.Google Scholar
Briggs-Myers, I., & Briggs, K. C. (1985). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In Lonner, W. J. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 137–164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bullinger, M., Anderson, R., Cella, D., & Aaronson, N. (1993). Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Quality of Life Research, 2, 451–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullinger, M., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., Leplège, A., Sullivan, M., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Gandek, B., Wagner, A., Aaronson, N., Bech, P., Fukuhara, S., Kaasa, S., & Ware, J. (1998). Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 913–923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, C. (1948). The factorial study of temperament traits. British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 1, 178–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2001). Human nature and culture: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 955–978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butcher, J. N., & Han, K. (1995). Development of an MMPI-2 scale to assess the presentation of self in a superlative manner: The S scale. In Butcher, J. N. & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10) (pp. 25–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., & Dahlstrom, W. G. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 272–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis/ Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2015). Adaptation of Assessment Scales in Cross-National Research: Issues, Guidelines, and Caveats. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 5(1), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 555–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022199030005001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & Watkins, D. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 155–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022102250225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). Validating factorial structure of the family values scale from a multilevel-multicultural perspective. International Journal of Testing, 14, 168–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, M. B. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882.Google ScholarPubMed
Camilli, G. (2006). Test fairness. In Brennan, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 220–256). Westport, CT: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Campinha-Bacote, J. (2002). The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: A model of care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13(3), 181–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camras, L. A., & Witherington, D. C. (2005). Dynamical systems approaches to emotional development. Developmental Review, 25, 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canales, S., Ganz, P. A., & Coscarelli, C. A. (1995). Translation and validation of a quality of life instrument for Hispanic American cancer patients: Methodological considerations. Quality of Life Research, 4, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carugati, F. (1990). From social cognition to social representations in the study of intelligence. In Duveen, G. M. & Lloyd, B. (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 126–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 58, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, A. K. S. (1963). Culture fair intelligence test. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1988). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16 PF). Champaign IL: IPAT.Google Scholar
Chalhoub-Deville, M., & Deville, C. (2006). Old, borrowed, and new thoughts in second language testing. In Brennan, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.) (pp. 517–530). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.Google Scholar
Chan, A. M. (2006). The Chinese Concepts of Guanxi, Mianzi, Renqing and Bao: Their interrelationships and implications for international business. Presented at the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conferences, Brisbane, Queensland.Google Scholar
Chan, W., Ho, R. M., Leung, K., Chan, D. K-S., & Yung, Y-F. (1999). An alternative method for evaluating congruence coefficients with Procrustes rotation: A bootstrap procedure. Psychological Methods, 4, 378–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, H., & Holt, G. R. (1991). More than relationship: Chinese interpersonal relationships. In Ting-Toomey, S. & Korzenny, F. (Eds.), Cross-cultural interpersonal communication (pp. 28–57). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., Prewett, M. S., Gray, A. A., Stilson, F. R., & Tuttle, M. D. (2009). Normative scoring of multidimensional pairwise preference personality scales using IRT: Empirical comparisons with other formats. Human Performance, 22, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M. (2004). Use of Western and indigenously developed personality tests in Asia. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M. (2009). The cultural perspective in personality assessment. In Butcher, J. N. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (pp. 44–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Wada, S., & Zhang, J. (2003). Indigenous measures of personality assessment in Asian countries: A review. Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 280–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Leung, K., Ward, C., & Leong, F. (2003). The English version of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory: Derived etics in a mirror position. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R. M., Song, W.-Z., Zhang, J.-X., & Zhang, J.-P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory (CPAI). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zhang, J. X., Sun, H. F., Gan, Y. Q., Song, W. Z., & Xie, D. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the five-factor model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 407–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2000). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(2), 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, S. F., Cheung, F. M., Howard, R., & Lim, Y. H. (2006). Personality across ethnic divide in Singapore: Are Chinese traits uniquely Chinese? Personality and Individual Differences, 41(3), 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, D. (1990). The essentials of factor analysis (2nd ed.). London: Cassel Educational Limited.Google Scholar
Chinese Culture Connection (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chow, S. S.-Y., & Chu, M. H.-T. (2007). The impact of filial piety and parental involvement on academic achievement motivation in Chinese secondary school students. Asian Journal of Counselling, 14(1&2), 91-124.Google Scholar
Christiansen, N. D., Burns, G. N., & Montgomery, G. E. (2005). Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment. Human Performance, 18, 267–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, K.-T., Campbell, J. B., & Yoo, J. H. (1974). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5(4), 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, T. A. (2001). Personality measurement in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 979–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Church, A. T. (2009). Prospects for an integrated trait and cultural psychology. European Journal of Personality, 23, 153–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, A. T. (2010). Measurement issues in cross-cultural research. In Walford, G., Viswanathan, M., & Tucker, E. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of measurement (pp. 151–157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, T. A., & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the big five and Tellegen’s three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Ching, C. M., and 16 others. (2013). Within-individual variability in self-concepts and personality states: Applying density distribution and situation-behavior approaches across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 922–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I. (2000). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 137–152.Google Scholar
Clauser, B. E., & Mazor, K. M. (1998). Using statistical procedures to identify differentially functioning test items. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleary, A. T., & Hilton, T. L. (1968). An investigation of item bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliff, N. (1966). Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychometrika, 31, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, N. (2003). Teenyboppers, groupies, and other grotesques: Girls and women and rock culture in the 1960s and early 1970s. Journal of Popular Music Studies, 15(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, C. K. (1992). The MBTI: Potential uses and misuses in personnel administration. Public Personnel Management, 21(4), 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coleman, M., & Liau, T. L. (1975). A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 283–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, M., & Liau, T. L. (1975). A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 283–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colome, A. (2001). Lexical activation in bilinguals’ speech production: Language-specific or language independent? Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 721–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conners, C. K. (2008). Conners 3rd edition: Manual. Toronto, ON: MHS.Google Scholar
Conway, J. M., & Huffcut, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J. (1978) Cultural relativism as an ethnocentric notion. In Beehler, R. & Drengoson, A. R. (Eds.). The philosophy of society (pp. 289–315). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Corulla, W. J. (1990). A revised version of the psychoticism scale for children. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corwyn, R. F., & Bradley, R. H. (2005). The cross-gender equivalence of strains and gains from occupying multiple roles among dual-earner couples. Parenting: Science and Practice, 5(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual’s two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 365–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10, 1–9.Google Scholar
Cox, T. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Crites, J. O., Bechtoldt, H. P., Goodstein, L. D., & Heilbrun, A. B. Jr. (1961). A factor analysis of the California Psychological Inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45, 408–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1946). Response sets and test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropanzano, R. & Wright, T. A. (2003). Procedural justice and organizational staffing: A tale of two paradigms. Human Resource Management Review, 13(1), 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, T., Bazron, B., Dennis, K., & Isaacs, M. (1989). Towards a culturally competent system of care (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.Google Scholar
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cudeck, R., & MacCallum, R. C. (Eds.) (2007). Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cull, A., Sprangers, M., Bjordal, K., Aaronson, N., West, K., & Bottomley, A. (2002). EORTC quality of life group translation procedure (2nd ed.). Retrieved on August 28, 2016 from www.ipenproject.org/documents/methods_docs/Surveys/EORTC_translation.pdf.Google Scholar
Currie, C., Nic, G. S., Godeau, E., Roberts, C., Smith, R., Currie, D., Pickett, W., Richter, M., Morgan, A. & Barnekow, V. (Eds.) (2008). Inequalities in young people’s health: HBSC international report from the 2005/06 Survey. Health Policy for Children and Adolescents. 5. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
Cyscowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 171–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, E., & Chall, J. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 11–28.Google Scholar
Davison, M. L. (1985). Multidimensional scaling versus components analysis of test intercorrelations. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 94-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dazzi, C. (2011). The Eysenck personality questionnaire – Revised (EPQ-R): A confirmation of the factorial structure in the Italian context. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 790–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beuckelaer, A., Lievens, F., & Swinnen, G. (2007). Measurement equivalence in the conduct of a global organizational survey across countries in six cultural regions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 575–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Girolamo, G. & McFarlane, A. C. (1996). The epidemiology of PTSD: A comprehensive review of the literature. In Marsella, A. J., Friedman, M. J. & Gerrity, E. T. (Eds.). Ethnocultural aspects of PTSD: Issues research and clinical applications. (pp. 33–86). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., Di Blas, L., & Perugini, M. (1998). Two independently constructed Italian trait taxonomies: Comparisons with Italian and between Italian and Germanic languages. European Journal of Personality, 12, 19–41.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deary, I. J., Pattie, A., & Starr, J. M. (2013). The stability of intelligence from age 11 to age 90 years: The Lothian birth cohort of 1921. Psychological Science, 12, 2361–2368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeDonno, M. A., Rivera-Torres, K., Monis, A., & Fagan, J. F. (2014). The Influence of a time limit and bilingualism on scholastic assessment test performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 16(2), 211–224.Google Scholar
De Jong, J. T. V. M., Komproe, I. H., Spinazzola, J., Van der Kolk, B. A., & Van Ommeren, M. H. (2005). DESNOS in three postconflict settings: Assessing cross-cultural construct equivalence. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18(1), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeMaio, T., & Landreth, L. (2004). Do different cognitive interview techniques produce different results. In Presser, S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M., Lessler, J., Martin, E., Martin, J. & Singer, E. (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 89–108). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demo, D. H., Allen, K. R. & Fine, M. A. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of family diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deregowski, J. B., & Serpell, R. (1971). Performance on a sorting task: A cross-cultural experiment. International Journal of Psychology, 6, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodeen, H. (2004). Stability of differential item functioning over a single population in survey data. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(3), 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doi, T. (1973). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization. In Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.), Differential Item Functioning (pp. 35–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dorans, N. J., & Kulick, E. (1986). Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the scholastic aptitude test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, R. L., Marcus, A., & Lee, W. (1996). Development of the 12-Item Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT). The Laryngoscope, 106(3), 353–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du, Y., & Yates, F. (1995). When to adjust for Differential Item Functioning. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9(1), 414.Google Scholar
DuBay, W. H. (2006). Smart language: Readers, readability, and the grading of text. Costa Mesa: Impact Information.Google Scholar
Dundes, A. (1962). From etic to emic units in the structural study of folktales. Journal of American Folklore, 75, 95-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Educational Testing Service (ETS) (2015). The ETS Standards for Quality and Fairness. Princeton: ETS. Retrieved on August 17, 2016 from www.ets.org.Google Scholar
Eklöf, H. (2007). Test-taking motivation and mathematics performance in TIMSS 2003. International Journal of Testing, 7(3), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eklöf, H. (2010). Skill and will: Test-taking motivation and assessment quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 345–356.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In Scherer, K. R. E. (Ed.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 319–343). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. B.(1989). Differential item functioning: Implications for test translations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 912–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elosua, P., & Iliescu, D. (2012). Tests in Europe: Where we are and where we should go. International Journal of Testing, 12, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179–197.Google Scholar
Enriquez, V. G. (1994). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. Manila: De La Salle University Press.Google Scholar
Ercikan, K., & Solano-Flores, G. (2014). Introduction to the special issue: Levels of analysis in the assessment of linguistic minority students. Applied Measurement in Education, 24(4), 233–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ercikan, K., Simon, M., & Oliveri, M. E. (2013). Score comparability of multiple language versions of assessments within jurisdictions. In Simon, M., Ercikan, K. & Rousseau, M. (Eds.), Improving large-scale assessment in education: Theory, issues and practice (pp. 110–124). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Esposito, J. L., & Rothgeb, J. M. (1997). Evaluating survey data: Making the transition from pretesting to quality assessment. In Lyberg, L., Biemer, P., Collins, M., de Leeuw, E., Dippo, C., Schwarz, N. & Trewin, D. (Eds.), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. 541–571). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations (EFPA) (2013). EFPA review model for the description and evaluation of psychological and educational tests: Test review form and notes for reviewers, Version 4.2.6. Retrieved on February 12, 2016 from www.efpa.org.Google Scholar
European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations (EFPA) Board of Assessment (2013). EFPA review model for the description and evaluation of psychological and educational tests: Test review form and notes for reviewers. Bruxelles: EFPA.Google Scholar
Everitt, B. S. (2002). The Cambridge dictionary of Statistics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evers, A., Muñiz, J., Bartram, D., Boben, D., Egeland, J., Fernandez-Hermida, J. R., Frans, Ö., Gintiliené, G., Hagemeister, C., Halama, P., Iliescu, D., Jaworowska, A., Jiménez, P., Manthouli, M., Matesic, K., Schittekatte, M., Sümer, H. C., & Urbánek, T. (2012). Testing practices in the 21st century: Developments and European psychologists’ opinions. European Psychologist, 17(4), 300–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1959). Manual of the Maudsley Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. (1975). Manual: Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (Junior and Adult). San Diego: EdITS.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1991). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Eysenck, S. B. G., Pitariu, H., Iliescu, D., & Băban, A. (2008). The Eysenck Adult Personality Scales: Technical and interpretative manual. Cluj-Napoca: Odiseea.Google Scholar
Eze, M. O. (2008). What is African Communitarianism? Against consensus as a regulative Ideal. South African Journal of Philosophy, 27(4), 386–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factorial analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahrenberg, J., & Selg, H. (1970). Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Fahrenberg, J., Hampel, R., & Selg, H. (2010). Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar FPI-R (8th ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Fahrenberg, J., Hampel, R., Selg, H., Pitariu, H. P., & Iliescu, D. (2007). Inventarul de Personalitate Freiburger (FPI, Freiburger Personlichkeitsinventar): Manual tehnic și interpretativ [FPI Test Manual]. Cluj-Napoca: Odiseea.Google Scholar
Fan, W., Cheung, F. M., Zhang, J. X., & Cheung, S. F. (2011). Combined emic-etic approach to personality: CPAI and cross-cultural applications. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(12), 1418–1429.Google Scholar
Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, A. L., & Marcopulos, B. A. (2008). A comparison of normative data for the Trail Making Test from several countries: Equivalence of norms and considerations for interpretation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 239–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Karg, R. S., & Spitzer, R. L. (2015). Structured clinical interview for DSM-5 disorders, clinician version (SCID-5-CV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Fischer, G. H. (1993). Notes on the Mantel-Haenszel procedure and another chi-squared test for the assessment of DIF. Methodika, 7, 88-100.Google Scholar
Fischer, G. H. (1997). Unidimensional Linear Logistic Rasch Models. In van der Linden, W. J. & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (pp. 225–244). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, M. (2007). Are correlations constant over time? Application of the CC-TRIGT-Test to return series from different asset classes. SFB 649 Discussion Paper 2007-012. Berlin: Humboldt University.Google Scholar
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flesch, R. (2016). How to Write Plain English. Retrieved on July 26, 2016 from www.mang.canterbury.ac.nz/writing_guide/writing/flesch.shtml.Google Scholar
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., White, T., & Messer, M. A. (2010). Mini-Mental State Examination, Second Edition: User’s Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., White, T., Messer, M. A., Munteanu, C., Iliescu, D., & Livinti, R. (2013). Mini-Mental State Examination, Second Edition: User’s Manual (Romanian adaptation). Bucharest: OS Romania.Google Scholar
Forehand, R., & Kotchick, B. A. (1996). Cultural diversity: A wake-up call for parent training. Behavior Therapy, 27(2), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, B., Levin, K., & Fisher, S. (1999). Test of an appraisal method for establishment survey questionnaires. Proceedings of the ASA Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 145–149. Retrieved on June 19, 2016 from www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/papers.Google Scholar
Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Goh, A., Bruursema, K., & Kessler, S. R. (2012). The deviant citizen: Measuring potential positive relations between counterproductive work behaviour and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenburg, W. K., & Dodds, J. B. (1996). Denver II technical manual. Denver, CO: Denver Developmental Materials.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Guenole, N., Levine, S. J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T., (2013). The NEO-PI-R: Factor structure and gender invariance from exploratory structural equation modeling analyses in a high-stakes setting. Assessment, 20(1), 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrenya, W. K. Jr., & Hwang, K. K. (1996). Chinese social interaction: Harmony and hierarchy on the good earth. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 309–321). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gade, C. B. N. (2012). What is Ubuntu? Different interpretations among South Africans of African descent. South African Journal of Philosophy, 31(3), 484–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrido, M. V., Lopes, D., Prada, M., Rodrigues, D., Jeronimo, R., & Mourao, R. P. (2016, July). What’s in a face: Norms for static vs. dynamic emotional expressions. Presented at the 31st International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
Gati, I. (1979). A hierarchical model for the structure of vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 15, 90-106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gati, I. (1982). Testing models for the structure of vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 164–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gati, I. (1991). The structure of vocational interests. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. (1984). Anti-anti-relativism. American Anthropologist, 86(2), 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisinger, K. F., Spies, R. A., Carlson, J. F., & Plake, B. S. (Eds.) (2007). The seventeenth mental measurement yearbook. Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar
Gendre, F. (1966). Evaluation de la personnalite et situation de selection. Bulletin d’Etudes et Recherches Psychologiques, 15, 259–261.Google Scholar
Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Kagitcibasi, C., & Poortinga, Y. H. (Eds.). (2006). Families across cultures: A 30-nation psychological study. New York, NY: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ger, G. (1990). Measuring and comparing materialism cross-culturally. In Goldberg, M. E., Gorn, G., & Pollay, R. W. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Volume 17) (pp. 186–192). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Gerber, E. (1999). The view from anthropology: Ethnography and the cognitive interview. In Sirken, M., Hermann, D., Schechter, S., Schwarz, N., Tanur, J. & Tourangeau, R. (Eds.), Cognition and Survey Research (pp. 217–234). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gierl, M., Jodoin, M. G., & Ackerman, T. A. (2000). Performance of Mantel-Haenszel, Simultaneous Item Bias Test, and logistic regression when the proportion of DIF items is large. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, Louisiana, April 2000).Google Scholar
Gleason, T. C. (1976). On redundancy in canonical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1004–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnys, J. A., & Willis, W. G. (1991). Validation of executive function tasks with young children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7, 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetzmann, W. N., Li, L., & Rouwenhorst, K. G. (2005). Long-term global market correlations. Journal of Business, 78(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, S., & Naglieri, J. A. (2010). Autism spectrum rating scales: Technical manual. Toronto, ON: MHS.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Boston: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Goodnow, J. J. (2002). Parents’ knowledge and expectations: Using what we know. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 3. Being and becoming a parent (pp. 439–460). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Görlich, Y., & Schuler, H. (2010). Arbeitsprobe zur berufsbezogenen Intelligenz. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd. ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). The theory of continuous norming. In Gorsuch, R. L. (chair), Continuous norming: An alternative to tabled norms? Symposium presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, California.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. (1998). The General Intelligence Factor. Scientific American Presents, 9(4), 24–29.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. (1957). Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. (1987). California Psychological Inventory administrator’s guide (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G., & Brad ley, P. (1996a). California Psychological Inventory manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G., & Bradley, P. (1996b). Theory and origins of a 3-vector model of personality structure. Paper presented at the Annual APA Convention, Toronto, Ontario, 13 August.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G., & Bradley, P. (2005). California Psychological Inventory CPI260 manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. (1983). The Adjective Check List manual (1983 ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Gough, H., Pitariu, H., Iliescu, D., Tureanu, V., & Peleașă, C. (2006). Inventarul Psihologic California: Monografie [A CPI monography]. București: PsihoCover.Google Scholar
Gower, J. C. (1971). A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 27(4), 857–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayson, D. A., Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Creasey, H., & Broe, G. A. (2000). Item bias in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Effects of physical disorders and disability in an elderly community sample. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(5), 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, B. F., Crone, C. R., & Folk, V. G. (1989). A method for studying differential distractor functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. A. (1992). Testing whether correlation matrices are different from each other. Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J., & Serro, L. C. (2015). Encouraging critical thinking and professional reading with literacy bags. The Open Communication Journal, 9(1), 65–71.Google Scholar
Greenfield, K. F. (1997a). Culture as a process: Empirical methods for cultural psychology. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H. & Pandey, J. (Eds.). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 301–346). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Gregoire, J., & Hambleton, R. K. (2015, July). Present and future of the ITC guidelines on test adaptation. Presented at the 14th European Congress of Psychology, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
Grégoire, J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.). (2009). Advances in test adaptation research [Special Issue]. International Journal of Testing, 9(2), 73-166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregoire, J., de Laval, N., Mesters, P., & Czarka, M. (1994). Validation of the Quality of Life in Depression Scale in population of adult depressive patients aged 60 and above. Quality of Life Research, 3(1), 13–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, S. D., & Church, A. T. (1999). A cross-cultural study of response biases in personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurr, T. & Harff, B. (1994). Ethnic conflict in world politics (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Vie, M. L. (2012). How universal Is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habel, U., Guru, R. C., Mandal, M. K., Salloum, J. B., Gur, R. E., & Schneider, F. (2000). Emotional processing in schizophrenia across cultures: Standardized measures of discrimination and experience. Schizophrenia Research, 42, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment (Bulletin of the International Test Commission), 10, 229–244.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC Test Translation and Adaptation Guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Vol 17(3), 2001, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambleton, R. K. (2002). Adapting achievement tests into multiple languages for international assessments. In Porter, A. C. & Gamoran, A. (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 58–76). Washington: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F. & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. K., & Traub, R. E. (1974). The effects of item order on test performance and stress. The Journal of Experimental Education, 43(1), 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambleton, R. K., & Zenisky, A. L. (2011). Translating and adapting tests for cross-cultural assessments. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (Eds.). Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 46–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.) (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R. K., Yu, J., & Slater, S. C. (1999). Field-test of the ITC guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 270–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 23, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harkness, J. (2003). Questionnaire translation. In Harkness, J., Van de Vijver, F. J. R. & Moher, P. (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 35–56). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Harkness, J., Pennell, B. E., & Schoua-Glusberg, A. (2004). Survey questionnaire translation and assessment. In Presser, S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M., Lessler, J., Martin, E., Martin, J. & Singer, E. (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 453–473). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, J., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Mohler, P. Ph. (Eds.) (2003). Cross-cultural survey methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Harrison, P. L., & Oakland, T. (2008). Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, second edition: Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Huiskamp, P. (1999). Priming word order in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 16(6), 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harzing, A. W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country Study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(2), 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haven, S., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1977). Tucker’s coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: An empirical study. Heymans Bulletin 290 EX, unpublished report by the Department of Psychology, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). A general response style factor: Evidence from a multi-ethnic study in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 794–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, J., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015a). Effects of a General Response Style on cross-cultural comparisons: Evidence from the Teaching and Learning International Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, J., Espinosa, A., Poortinga, Y. H., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). Acquiescent and socially desirable response styles in cross-cultural value surveys. In Jackson, L. T. B., Meiring, D., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Idemudia, E. & Gabrenya, W. K. Jr (Eds.), Toward sustainable development through nurturing diversity (pp. 98-111). Melbourne, FL: International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology.Google Scholar
He, J., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Espinosa, A. D., Abubakar, A., Dimitrova, R., Adams, B. G., Aydinli, A., Atitsogbe, K., Alonso-Arbiol, I., Bobowik, M., Fischer, R., Jordanov, V., Mastrotheodoros, S., Neto, F., Ponizovsky, Y. J., Reb, J., Sim, S., Sovet, L., Stefenel, D., Suryani1, A. O., Tair, E., & Villieux, A. (2014). Socially desirable responding: Enhancement and denial in 20 countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 49(3), 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, revised and expanded: Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., Curtiss, G., Avram, E., Ciurea, A. V., Iliescu, D., & Tașcu, A. (2010). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Manual for the Romanian form. Bucharest: OS Romania.Google Scholar
Hedman, A. S. (2008). Using the SMOG formula to revise a health-related document. American Journal of Health Education. 39(1), 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrih, V. (2008). Structure of vocational interests in Serbia: Evaluation of the spherical model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggestad, E. D., Morrison, M., Reeve, C. L., & McCloy, R. A. (2006). Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: Evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hein, S., Reich, J., & Grigorenko, E. (2015). Cultural manifestation of intelligence in formal and informal learning environments during childhood. In Jansen, L. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human development and culture: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 214–229). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Social desirability among Canadian and Japanese students, Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 777–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903–918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B., & De Raad, B. (1999). The Five-Factor Inventory (FFPI). Personality & Individual Differences, 27,307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, A. A. J., Perugini, M., Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., Johnson, J. A., De Fruyt, F., Hrebickova, M., Kreitler, S., Murakami, T., Bratko, D., Conner, M., Nagy, J., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Ruisel, I. (2003). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory: Cross-cultural generalizability across 13 countries. European Journal of Personality, 17, 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, D. Y. F. (1996). Filial piety and its psychological consequences. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 155–165). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., Chasiotis, A., Friedlmeier, W., Busch, H., & Campos, D. (2005). The measurement of implicit motives in three cultures: Power and affiliation in Cameroon, Costa Rica, and Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 689–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s consequences, comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1270–1285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holden, R. B. (2010). Face validity. In Weiner, I. B. & Craighead, W. E. (Eds.). The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (4th ed.) (pp. 637–638). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1992). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L., Fritsche, B. A., & Powell, A. B. (1994). Self-directed search: Technical manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Holland, P. W. (2010). A framework and history for score linking. In Dorans, N. J., Pommerich, M. & Holland, P. W. (Eds.), Linking and Aligning Scores and Scales (pp. 5-30). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential Item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In Wainer, H. and Brown, H. I. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 129–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Owen, J., Worthington, E. L., & Utsey, S. O. (2013). Cultural humility: Measuring openness to culturally diverse clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, J. L., & Blankson, N. (2005) Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 41–68). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide in measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, J. L., McArdle, J. J., & Mason, R. (1983). When is invariance not invariant: A practical scientist’s look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance. Southern Psychologist, 4, 179–188.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., Wanberg, K. W., & Appel, M. (1973). On the internal structure of the MMPI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 8, 131–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hough, L. M. (1998). Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance, 11 (2/3), 209–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations, the globe study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Hubbard, R., & Allen, S. J. (1987). A cautionary note on the use of principal component analysis: Supportive empirical evidence. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudler, M., & Richter, R. (2002). Cross-national comparison of the quality of life in Europe: Inventory of surveys and methods. Social Indicators Research, 58, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, S. M. (1993). Cross-cultural comparability of quality of life measures. Drug Information Journal, 27, 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, S. M., McEwen, J., Williams, J., & Papp, E. (1981). The Nottingham Health Profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations. Social Science and Medicine, 15A, 221–229.Google ScholarPubMed
Hunter, J. E.. Gerbing, D. W., & Boster, F. J. (1982). Machiavellian beliefs and personality: Construct invalidity of the Machiavellianism dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1293–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, J., & Cattell, R. B. (1962). The Procrustes program: Producing direct rotation to test a hypothesized factor structure. Behavioral Science, 7, 258–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ifabuyumi, O. I. (1981). Depressive illness presenting as monosymptomatic hallucination: A case report. African Journal of Psychiatry, 7(1/2), 17–20.Google Scholar
Iliescu, D., & Ion, A. (2009, July). Psychometric Performance of the CPAI-2 as a Big Five Measure in the Romanian Context. Paper presented at the European Congress of Psychology, Oslo.Google Scholar
Iliescu, D., & Ion, A. (2014, July). Psychometric properties of a measure of personality as a function of language literacy and test-taking motivation in an ethnically diverse sample. Paper presented at the 9th Conference of the International Test Commission, San Sebastian, Spain.Google Scholar
Iliescu, D., & Ispas, D. (2016). Personality assessment. In Leong, F. T. L., Bartram, D., Cheung, F. M., Geisinger, K. F. & Iliescu, D. (2016). The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 134–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., & Ispas, D. (2011). Examining the criterion-related validity of the employee screening questionnaire: A three-sample investigation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(2), 222–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliescu., D., Ispas, D., & Ilie, A. (2013, July). Personality, wellbeing and quality of life. A comparison between Chinese working in Romania and Romanians, based on an emic-etic measure of personality. Paper presented at the 13th European Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Iliescu, D., Livinți, R., & Pitariu, H. (2010). Adaptarea Job Stress Survey (JSS) în România: Implicații privind manifestări ale stresului ocupațional în România. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 8 (1), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., Ispas, D., & Ion, A. (2012). Emotional intelligence in personnel selection: Applicant reactions, criterion and incremental validity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(3), 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., Ispas, D., & Ion, A. (2013). Examining the psychometric properties of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test: Findings from an Eastern European Culture. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliescu, D., Ispas, D., Ilie, A. & Ion, A. (2012, July). Incremental validity of CPAI-2 for Romanian and Chinese workers in Romania. Presented at the 8th Conference of the International Test Commission, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Iliescu, D., Ispas, D., Ilie, A., & Ion, A. (2013). The structure of vocational interests in Romania. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 294–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of International Education (IIE) (2014). Charting new pathways to higher education: International secondary students in the United States. New York: Institute of International Education.Google Scholar
Institute of International Education (IIE) (2014). Open doors 2015 report on international educational exchange. New York: Institute of International Education.Google Scholar
International Test Commission (2005). International Guidelines on Test Adaptation. [www.intestcom.org]Google Scholar
International Test Commission (2014). The ITC Statement On the Use of Tests and Other Assessment Instruments for Research Purposes. [www.intestcom.org].Google Scholar
International Test Commission (2016). The ITC Guidelines in Support of the Fair and Valid Assessment of Linguistically Diverse Populations (First Official Draft). [www.intestcom.org].Google Scholar
International Test Commission (2017). International Guidelines on Test Adaptation (2nd ed.). [www.intestcom.org].Google Scholar
Ion, A., Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., & Ispas, D. (2016). The emic-etic approach to personality measurement in personnel selection. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ion, A., Iliescu, D., Ratanadilok, K., Rana, N., Widyanti, A., & Aldhafri, S. (2016). A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Personality Structure through the Lens of the HEXACO Model. Journal of Personality Assessment [accepted].Google Scholar
Isaacs, M., & Benjamin, M. (1991). Towards a culturally competent system of care (Vol. 2): Programs which utilize culturally competent principles. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.Google Scholar
Ispas, D., Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., Sulea, C., Askew, K., Rohlfs, J. T., & Whalen, K. (2014). Revisiting the relationship between impression management and job performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. C., Wroblewski, V. R., & Ashton, M. C. (2000). The impact of faking on employment tests: Does forced choice offer a solution? Human Performance, 13(4), 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (1974). Personality Research Form manual. Goshen, New York: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (2003). The Multidimensional Aptitude Battery-II: Manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N., Iliescu, D., & Andreescu, M. (2009). Employee Screening Questionnaire-2: Manual Tehnic. Cluj-Napoca: Sinapsis.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N., Iliescu, D., & Glinta, F. (2008). The Multidimensional Aptitude Battery, Second Edition: Technical and interpretative manual for the Romanian version. Cluj-Napoca: Odiseea.Google Scholar
Jawahar, P. D., & Raghavendra, S. N. (2011). Perceptual difference of role based performance: A gender study. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1(3), 175–186.Google Scholar
Jennrich, R. I. (1970). An asymptotic chi-square test for the equality of two correlation matrices. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 904–912.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory, Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. A. (1993). Dependency and Japanese socialization: Psychoanalytic and anthropological investigations into Amae. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, T., Kulesa, P., Cho, Y. I., & Shavitt, S. (2005). The relation between culture and response styles: Evidence from 19 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(2), 264–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T., O’Rourke, D., Chavez, N., Sudman, S., Warnecke, R., Lacey, L., & Horm, J. (1997). Social cognition and responses to survey questions among culturally diverse populations. In Lyberg, L. E., Biemer, P. P., Collins, M., De Leeuw, E. D., Dippo, C., Schwarz, N. & Trewin, D. (Eds.), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. 87–113). New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. N. (2003). Racial bias in the assessment of cognitive functioning of older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 7(2), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, J. M., & Kellaris, J. J. (2004). Cross-national differences in proneness to scarcity effects: The moderating roles of familiarity, uncertainty avoidance, and need for cognitive closure. Psychology & Marketing, 21(9), 739–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagitcibasi, C. (1996). Family and human development across cultures. A view from the other side. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kandawasvika, G. Q., Mapingure, P. M., Nhembe, M., & Mtereredzi, R. (2012). Validation of a culturally modified short form of the McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities in 6 to 8 year old Zimbabwean school children: A cross section study. BMC Neurology 12(1), 147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Karr, S. K., Carvajal, H., & Palmer, B. L. (1992). Comparison of Kaufman’s short form of the McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, fourth edition. Percept Mot Skills, 74, (3 Pt 2):1120–1122.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children: Technical manual (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. M. (1977). Clinical evaluation of young children with the McCarthy Scales, 1st edition. New York: Grune & Straton.Google Scholar
Kawahara, M., Sauter, D., & Tanaka, A. (2016). Development of cultural differences in emotional perception from face and voice. Presented at the 31st International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
Kay, S. R., Opler, L. A., & Fiszbein, A. (2009). Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): Technical manual. Toronto, ON: MHS.Google Scholar
Keith, T. Z., & Reynolds, M. R. (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll abilities and cognitive tests: What we’ve learned from 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 635–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. G. (1955). Rank correlation methods. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). London: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C., & Ustün, T. B. (2008). The WHO World Mental Health Surveys: Global perspectives on the epidemiology of mental disorders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Chatterji, S., Lee, S., Ormel, J., Ustün, T. B., & Wang, P. S. (2009). The global burden of mental disorders: An update from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys. Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale, 18(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, R. C., Barber, C., Beck, A., Berglund, P., Cleary, P. D., McKenas, D., Pronk, N., Simon, G., Stang, P., Ustün, T. U., & Wang, P. (2003). The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45 (2), 156–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, U., & Park, Y. S. (2006). The scientific foundation of indigenous and cultural psychology: The transactional approach. In. Kim, U., Yang, K.-S. & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., Park, Y. S., & Park, D. (1999). The Korean indigenous psychology approach: Theoretical considerations and empirical applications. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8-75, Millington, TN: Naval Technical Training, US Naval Air Station, Memphis, TN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical Significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirmayer, L. J. (2001). Cultural variations in the clinical Presentation of depression and anxiety: Implications for diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62, 22–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirov, G., & Murray, R. M. (1999) Ethnic differences in the presentation of bipolar affective disorder. European Psychiatry, 14, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klare, G. R. (2000). Readable computer documentation. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation. 24(3), 148–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohs, S. C. (1923). Intelligence measurement: A psychological and statistical study based upon the block-design tests. New York: MacMillan Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2010). Test equating, scaling and linking. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S., (2007). NEPSY-II: Clinical and Interpretative manual. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
Kristjansson, E. A., Desrochers, A., & Zumbo, B. (2003). Translating and adapting measurement instruments for cross-linguistic and cross-cultural research: A guide for practitioners. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 35(2), 127–142.Google ScholarPubMed
Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kullback, S. (1967). On testing correlation matrices. Applied Statistics, 16, 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S. K. K. (2011). Indian indigenous concepts and perspectives: Developments and future possibilities. In Misra, G. (Ed.). Psychology in India (Vol. 4) (pp. 93–172). Delhi: Pearson.Google Scholar
Kuo, H. K., & Marsella, A. J. (1977). The meaning and measurement of Machiavellianism in Chinese and American college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurz, R. (2016, July). Cross-cultural development of assessment tools. Presented at the 31st International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal (2010) The soul of creativity: Forging a moral rights law for the United States, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kwan, K.-L. K. (2000). Counseling Chinese peoples: Perspective of filial piety. Asian Journal of Counseling, 7(1), 23–41.Google Scholar
Larntz, K., & Perlman, M. D. (1985). A simple test for the equality of correlation matrices. Unpublished report, Department of Statistics. University of Minnesota, St. Paul. MN. (Retrieved June 20, 2016).Google Scholar
Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., Huang, G. H., & Li, X. X. (2008). The effects of emotional intelligence on job performance and life satisfaction for the research and development scientists in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C., & Green, R. T. (1991). Cross-cultural examination of the Fishbein behavioral intentions model. Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. Y., & Dawes, P. L. (2005). Guanxi, trust, and long-term orientation in Chinese business markets. Journal of International Marketing, 13(2), 28–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. T., McCauley, C. R., & Draguns, J. G. (1999). Why study personality in culture? In Lee, Y. T., McCauley, C. R. & Draguns, J. G. (Eds.). Personality and person perceptions across cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 3-22.Google Scholar
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality and Quantity, 88, 61–70.Google Scholar
Lenhard, A., Lenhard, W., Suggate, S., & Segerer, R. (2016). A Continuous Solution to the Norming Problem. Assessment, online before print.Google Scholar
Lessler, J., & Forsyth, B. (1996). A coding system for appraising questionnaires. In Schwarz, N. & Sudman, S. (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 259–292). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Leton, D. A., & Walter, S. (1962). A factor analysis of the California Psychological Inventory and Minnesota Counseling Inventory. California Journal of Educational Research, 13, 126–133.Google Scholar
Leventhal, A. M. (1966). An anxiety scale for the CPI. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(4), 459–461.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leventhal, A. M. (1968). Additional technical data on the CPI Anxiety Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 15(5), 479–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., Roberts, R. E., & Allen, N. B. (1997). Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychology and Aging, 12, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liepmann, D., Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., & Amthauer, R. (2007). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R: Manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Liepmann, D., Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., Amthauer, R., Iliescu, D., & Miron, A. (2012). Intelligence Structure Test 2000 R: Manual for the Romanian version. Bucharest: OS Romania.Google Scholar
Lim, Y. Y., Prang, K. H., Cysique, L., Pietrzak, R. H., Snyder, P. J., & Maruff, P. (2009). A method for cross-cultural adaptation of a verbal memory assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1190–1200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, E. J., & Church, A. T. (2004). Are indigenous Chinese personality dimensions culture-specific? An investigation of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory in Chinese American and European American samples. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 586–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1987). Mantel-Haenszel and the Rasch model (Memorandum 39, MESA Psychometric Laboratory). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lindley, P. A., & Bartram, D. (2012). Use of the EFPA Test Review Model by the UK and issues relating to the internationalization of test standards. International Journal of Testing, 12(2), 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindley, P., Bartram, D., & Kennedy, N. (2004). EFPA Review Model for the description and evaluation of psychological tests: Test review form and notes for reviewers: Version 3.3. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society (November, 2004).Google Scholar
Lindley, P., Bartram, D., & Kennedy, N. (2008). EFPA Review Model for the description and evaluation of psychological tests: Test review form and notes for reviewers: Version 3.42. Brussels: EFPA Standing Committee on Tests and Testing (September, 2008).Google Scholar
Linn, R. L. (1993). Linking results of distinct assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(1), 83–102.Google Scholar
Livesley, W. J., & Jackson, D. N. (2009). Manual for the dimensional assessment of personality pathology - basic questionnaire. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
Livingston, S. A., & Kim, S. (2011). New approaches to equating with small samples. In von Davier, A. (Ed.), Statistical models for test equating, scaling, and linking (pp 109–122). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Loftus, E. (1984). Protocol analysis of responses to survey recall questions. In Jabine, T., Straf, M., Tanur, J. & Tourangeau, R. (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines (pp. 61–64). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Loong, T. (2003). Understanding sensitivity and specificity with the right side of the brain. BMJ, 327(7417), 716–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (2008). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s Congruence Coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y. (1997). Guanxi and performance of foreign-invested enterprises in China: An empirical inquiry. Management International Review, 37(1), 51–70.Google Scholar
Luxenberg, T., Spinazzola, J., & van der Kolk, B. A. (2001). Complex Trauma and Disorders of Extreme Stress (DESNOS) diagnosis: Part 1. Assessment. Directions in Psychiatry, 21, 373–394.Google Scholar
Lynn, R., & Irwing, P. (2004). Sex differences on the progressive matrices: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 32(5), 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. D. (2008). New paradigms for assessing emotional intelligence: Theory and data. Emotion, 8(4), 540–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maccoby, E. E. (2000). Parenting and its effects on children: On reading and misreading behavior genetics. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddox, B. (2015). Inside the assessment machine: The life and times of a test item. In Hamilton, M., Maddox, B. & Addey, C. (Eds.), Literacy as numbers: Researching the politics and practices of international literacy assessment (pp. 129–146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malda, M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Srinivasan, K., Transler, C., & Sukumar, P. (2010). Traveling with cognitive tests: testing the validity of the KABC-II adaptation in India. Assessment, 17, 107–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malda, M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Srinivasan, K., Transler, C., Sukumar, P., & Rao, K. (2008). Adapting a cognitive test for a different culture: An illustration of qualitative procedures. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 451–468.Google Scholar
Mantel, N. (1963). Chi-Square Tests with one degree of freedom: Extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(303), 690–700.Google Scholar
Mantel, N., & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22(4), 719–748.Google ScholarPubMed
Mao, H., Gu, Y., & Liang, M. (2012). Commentary on Nida vs. Chomsky’s translation theories. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(6), 1285–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, G., & Marin, B. V. (1989). Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Cultural variation in the self-concept. In Strauss, J. & Goethals, G. R. (Eds.), The self: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 18–48). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2007). Applications of latent-variable models in educational psychology: The need for methodological-substantive synergies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of Big-Five factor structure over the life span: Exploratory structural equation modeling tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity and La Dolce Vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1194–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthen, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big-five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. C., Mungas, D., Weldon, M., Reed, B., & Haan, M. (1997). Differential item functioning in English- and Spanish-speaking older adults. Psychology and Aging, 12, 718–725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, S. P. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical errors: An analysis of distractor choices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(4), 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2013). Intercultural communication in contexts (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Mathias, S. D., Fifer, S. K., & Patrick, D. L. (1994). Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: Avoiding errors in the minimalist approach. Quality of Life Research, 3, 403–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, D., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (Eds.) (2011). Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2002). Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT): User’s manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
McCarthy, E. D. (1994). The social construction of emotions: New directions from culture theory. In Wentworth, W. M. (Ed.), Social perspectives on emotion (Vol. 2) (pp. 267–279). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hrebícková, M., Avia, M. D., Sanz, J., Sanchez-Bernardos, M. L., Kusdil, M. E., Woodfield, R., Saunders, P. R., & Smith, P. B. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and lifespan development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 79 members of Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 407–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, I. (1994). Canadian study of health and aging: Study methods and prevalence of dementia. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 150, 899–913.Google Scholar
McGrew, K. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research (Editorial). Intelligence, 37, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed.) (pp. 136–181). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, G. H. (1969). SMOG grading - a new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639–646.Google Scholar
Meara, K., & Sireci, S. G. (2000). Appraising the dimensionality of the Medical College Admission Test: MCAT monograph. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.Google Scholar
Medvetz, Thomas (2012). Think tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megargee, E. I. (1966). Estimation of CPI scores from MMPI protocols. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 456–458.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Megargee, E. I. (1972). The California Psychological Inventory handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Meiring, D., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Rothmann, S., & Barrick, M. R. (2005). Construct, item, and method bias of cognitive and personality tests in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31, 1–8.Google Scholar
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1982). Contingency table models for assessing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. (1962). Response style and content measures from personality inventories, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 22, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. (1990). Validity of test interpretation and use. ETS Research Report Series, 1990(1), 1487–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelides, M. P. (2008). An illustration of a Mantel-Haenszel procedure to flag misbehaving common items in test equating. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 13(7), 1–16.Google Scholar
Middleton, K., & Laitusis, C. C. (2007). Examining test items for differential distractor functioning among students with learning disabilities. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, H. A. (2005). The Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST): Test generalizability and utility across race, literacy, and clinical opinion. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 32(6), 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millman, J., & Greene, J. (1993). The specification and development of tests of achievement and ability. In Linn, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 335–366). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.Google Scholar
Millon, T., Millon, C., Davis, R., & Grossman, S. (2006). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III: Manual. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2012). Is national culture a meaningful concept? Cultural values delineate homogeneous national clusters of in-country regions. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(2), 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. V. Jr., & Pierce-Jones, J. (1960). A factor analysis of Gough’s California Psychological Inventory. Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 453–456.Google ScholarPubMed
Mohammadzadeh-Koucheri, F. (1993). Interkultureller Vergleich mit einer variirten Form des Matrizentests von Formann. Unpublished master’s thesis University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Monk, J. J., & Stallings, W. M. (1970). Effects of item order on test scores. Journal of Educational Research, 63(10), 463–465.Google Scholar
Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(2), 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual (2nd ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Moser, C., & Kalton, G. (1971). Survey methods in social investigations. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Moule, J. (2012). Cultural competence: A primer for educators. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage.Google Scholar
Muchinsky, P. M. (2006). Psychology applied to work: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Woodsworth.Google Scholar
Mugny, G., & Carugati, F. (1989). Social representations of intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muñiz, J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Directions for the translation and adaptation of tests. Papeles del Psicologo, August, 63–70.Google Scholar
Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traduccion y adaptacion de los tests: segunda edicion. Psicothema, 25(2), 149–155.Google Scholar
Muñiz, J., Hambleton, R. K., & Xing, D. (2001). Small sample studies to detect flaws in item translations. International Journal of Testing, 1, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). BSEM measurement invariance analysis. Mplus Web Notes: No. 17. January 11, 2013.Google Scholar
Muthen, B. & Asparouhov, T. (2011). Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myors, B. (1996). A simple, exact test for the Holland hexagon. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myors, B. (1998). A Monte Carlo comparison of three tests of the Holland hexagon. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2010). The structure of vocational interests in Germany: Different methodologies, different conclusions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayanan, P., & Swaminathan, H. (1994). Performance of the Mantel-Haenszel and Simultaneous Item Bias procedures for detecting differential item functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(4), 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (1998) Genetics and mental disorders: Report of the National Institute of Mental Health’s Genetics Workgroup. Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
Nel, J. A., Valchev, V. H., Rothmann, S., van de Vijver, F. J., Meiring, D., & de Bruin, G. P. (2012). Exploring the personality structure in the 11 languages of South Africa. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 915–948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nenty, H. J., & Dinero, T. E. (1981). A cross-cultural analysis of the fairness of the Cattell Culture Fair Intelligence Test using the Rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5355–5368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomb, A. F., Bukowsh, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: a meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, D. L., Kundert, D. K., Lane, D. S., & Bull, K. S. (1988). Effects of varying item order on multiple-choice test scores: Importance of statistical and cognitive difficulty. Applied Measurement in Education, 1(1), 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, R. C., & Schnell, R. R. (1963). Factor scales for the California Psychological Inventory. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nida, E. A., & Reyburn, W. D. (1981). Meaning across cultures. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.Google Scholar
Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1969). The theory and practice of translation. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Nkaya, H. N., Huteau, M., & Bonnet, J. (1994). Retest effect on cognitive performance on the Raven-38 Matrices in France and in the Congo. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 503–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyborg, H. (2012). A conversation with Richard Lynn. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(2), 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neil, T., Sireci, S. G., & Huff, K. L. (2002). Evaluating the consistency of test content across two successive administrations of a state-mandated science and technology assessment (MCAS Validity Report No. 2). Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Research Report No. CEA-454. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.Google Scholar
Oakland, T. (2016). Testing and assessment of immigrants and second-language learners. In Leong, F. T. L., Bartram, D., Cheung, F. M., Geisinger, K. F. & Iliescu, D. (2016). The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 318–332). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakland, T., & Iliescu, D. (2016). Ethical standards, guidelines and related issues pertinent to international testing and assessment. In Leong, F. T. L., Bartram, D., Cheung, F. M., Geisinger, K. F. & Iliescu, D. (2016). The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 425–437). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakland, T., Glutting, J., & Horton, C. (1996). Manual for the Student Style Questionnaire. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Oakland, T., Iliescu, D., Chen, H.-Y., & Chen, J. H. (2013). Cross-national assessment of adaptive behavior in three countries. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 435–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odendaal, A. (2015). Cross-cultural differences in social desirability scales: Influence of cognitive ability. South-African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 41(1), #1259, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v41i1.1259.Google Scholar
OECD (2010). Presentation of the PISA 2012 FT Translation Kit. Retrieved on March 2, 2016 from www.oecd.org.Google Scholar
OECD (2013). PISA 2015 Translator’s Guide. Retrieved on March 2, 2016 from www.oecd.org.Google Scholar
OECD. (2010). Translation and adaptation guidelines for PISA 2012. Retrieved on April 16, 2016 from www.oecd.org.Google Scholar
OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 translator’s guide. Retrieved on April 16, 2016 from www.oecd.org.Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 660–679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.81.6.660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterlind, S. J., & Everson, H. T. (2009). Differential item functioning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozolins, U. (2009). Back translation as a means of giving translators a voice. Interpreting & Translation, 1(2), 1–13.Google Scholar
Pande, N., & Naidu, R. K. (1992). Anasakti and health: A study of non-attachment. Psychology and Developing Societies, 4, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parloff, M. D., Datta, L. E., Kleman, M., & Handlon, J. H. (1968). Personality characteristics which differentiate creative male adolescents and adults. Journal of Personality, 36, 528–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, V., Abas, M., Broadhead, J., Todd, C., & Reeler, A. (2001). Depression in developing countries: Lessons from Zimbabwe. British Medical Journal, 322(7284), 482–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R. & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (1994). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Reference manual for BIDR version 6. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Manual for Nonverbal Personality Questionnaire (NPQ) and Five-Factor Nonverbal Personality Questionnaire (FF-NPQ). Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., Ashton, M. C., Iliescu, D., Nedelcea, C., & Minulescu, M. (2005). Chestionarul Nonverbal de Personalitate [The Nonverbal Personality Inventory]. București: PsihoCover.Google Scholar
Pelcovitz, D., van der Kolk, B., Roth, S., Mandel, F., Kaplan, S., & Resick, P. (1997). Development of a criteria set and a structured interview for disorders of extreme stress (DESNOS). Journal of Traumatic Stress, 10, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendarvis, E. D., & Howley, A. (1995). Effects of poverty, secism and racism on intellect. In Howley, C. B., Howley, A. & Pendarvis, E. D. (Eds.), Out of our minds: Anti-intellectualism and talent development in American schooling (pp. 108–140). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Peng, K., Nisbett, R. E., & Wong, N. Y. C. (1997). Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions. Psychological Methods, 2, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piswanger, K. (1975). Interkulturelle Vergleiche mit dem Matrizentest von Formann. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Pitariu, H. D., & Iliescu, D. (2004). Inventarul Psihologic California: CPI260-Ro. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 2, 40–49.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polderman, T. J. C., Benyamin, B., de Leeuw, C. A., Sullivan, P. F., van Bochoven, A., Visscher, P. M., & Posthuma, D. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47(7), 702–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pommerich, M. (2010). Concordance: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In Dorans, N. J., Pommerich, M. & Holland, P. W. (Eds.), Linking and aligning scores and scales (pp. 199–216). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H., & Klieme, E. (2016). The history and current status of testing across cultures and countries. In Leong, F. T. L., Bartram, D., Cheung, F. M., Geisinger, K. F. & Iliescu, D. (Eds.), The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 14–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H., & Van Hemert, D. A. (2001). Personality and culture: Demarcating between the common and the unique. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 1033–1060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poortinga, Y. H., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1988). Culturally invariant parameters of cognitive functioning. In Berry, J. W., Irvine, S. H. & Hunt, E. B. (Eds.), Indigenous cognition: Functioning in cultural contexts (pp. 21–38). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prelow, H. M., Michaels, M. L., Reyes, L., Knight, G. P., & Barrera, M. (2002). Measuring coping in low-income European American, African American, and Mexican American adolescents: An examination of measurement equivalence. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 15(2), 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presser, S., & Blair, J. (1994). Survey pretesting: Do different methods produce different results? Sociological Methodology, 24, 73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presser, S., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. M., & Singer, E. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. L. (1999). Index of norms and ratings published in the Psychonomic Society journals. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 659–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Program for Prevention Research, Arizona State University (2000). Manual for the Children’s Coping Strategies Checklist and the How I Coped under Pressure Scale. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Räty, H., & Snellman, L. (1995). On the social fabric of intelligence. Papers on Social Representation, 4(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
Rabin, A. T. (1988). Determining difficulty levels of text written in languages other than English. In Zakaluk, B. L. & Samuels, S. J. (Eds.), Readability: Its past, present, and future (pp. 27–43). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Raju, N. S. (1988). The area between two item characteristic curves. Psychometrika, 53, 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raju, N. S. (1990). Determining the significance of estimated signed and unsigned areas between two item response functions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez-Esparza, N., Gosling, S. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Paradox lost: Unraveling the puzzle of Simpatia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 703–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez-Esparza, N., Gosling, S. D., Benet-Martinez, V., Potter, J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2006). Do bilinguals have two personalities? A special case of cultural frame switching. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, D. M., Huo, Y. P., & Pawelk, P. (1993). Social desirability bias in cross-cultural ethics research. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 1(2), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J. (1981). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Research supplement No. 1: The 1979 British standardisation of the Standard Progressive Matrices and Mill Hill Vocabulary Scales, together with comparative data from earlier studies in the UK, US, Canada, Germany and Ireland. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section 5: The Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2003) Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Reese, S. D., Danielson, W. A., Shoemaker, P. J., Chang, T., & Hsu, H.-L. (1986). Ethnicity-of-interviewer effects among Mexican-Americans and Anglos. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regmi, K., Naidoo, J., & Pilkington, P. (2010). Understanding the processes of translation and transliteration in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(1), 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retief, A. (1988). Method and theory in cross-cultural psychological assessment. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children, second edition: Manual. Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing.Google Scholar
Richter, L. M., Griesel, R. D., & Rose, C. (1994). The McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities: Adaptation & norms for use among black South African children. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 24, 17–30.Google Scholar
Robin, F., Sireci, S. G., & Hambleton, R. K. (2003). Evaluating the equivalence of different language versions of a credentialing exam. International Journal of Testing, 3(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Andres-Pueyo, A. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Spanish adaptation of the Five Factor Personality Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, H. J., & Swaminathan, H. (1993). Comparison of the logistic regression and Mantel-Haenszel procedures for detecting differential item functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17(2), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohner, R. P. (1999). Acceptance and rejection. In Levinson, D., Ponzetti, J & Jorgensen, P. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of human emotions. New York: Macmillan. pp. 6–14.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenquist, C. M., & Megargee, E. I. (1969). Delinquency in three cultures. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1984). Socially-desirable response and acquiescence in a cross-cultural survey of mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothgeb, J. M., Willis, G., & Forsyth, B. (2007). Questionnaire pretesting methods: Do different techniques and different organizations produce similar results? Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 96, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J.B., & Rafferty, J.E. (1950). Manual: The Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank: College form. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Rounds, J., & Tracey, T. J. G. (1996). Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 310–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudowicz, E., Lok, D., & Kitto, J. (1995). Use of the torrance tests of creative thinking in an exploratory study of creativity in hong kong primary school children: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 30(4), 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1979). Affective space is bipolar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, J. A., & Mehrabian, A. (1974). Distinguishing anger and anxiety in terms of emotional response factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, J. A., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality of environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. A., Lewicka, M., & Niit, T. (1989). A cross-cultural study of a circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 848–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M., Le Couteur, A., & Lord, C. (2003). Autism Disorder Interview, Revised (ADI-R). Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Ryan, J., & Brockmann, F. (2011). A practitioner’s introduction to equating. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
Sorensen, M. J., Mors, O., & Thomsen, P. H. (2005). DSM-IV or ICD-10-DCR diagnoses in child and adolescent psychiatry: does it matter? European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 14, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, P. R., Shen, W., Myors, B., et al. (2010). Perspectives from twenty-two countries on the legal environment for selection. In Farr, J. L. & Tippins, N. T. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 651–676). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Sackheim, H. A., & Gur, R. C. (1978). Self-deception, other-deception and consciousness. In Schwartz, G. E. & Shapiro, D. (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 2) (pp. 139–197). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saha, S., Chant, D., Welham, J., & McGrath, J. (2005). A systematic review of the prevalence of schizophrenia. PLoS Med. 2(5), e141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahoo, F. M. (1995). Indigenization of psychological measurements: Parameters and operationalization. Psychology and Developing Societies, 5, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Lado, M. (2003). Evidence of cross-cultural invariance of the big five personality dimensions in work settings. European Journal of Personality, 17, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samkange, S., & Samkange, T. M. (1980). Hunhuism or ubuntuism: A Zimbabwe indigenous political philosophy. Salisbury: Graham Publishing.Google Scholar
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69, 847–879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saucier, G., Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2000). Cross-language studies of lexical personality factors. In Hampson, S. E. (Ed.), Advances in personality psychology (Vol. 1) (pp. 1–36). East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Savickas, M. L., Taber, B. J., & Spokane, A. R. (2002). Convergent and discriminant validity of five interests inventories. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 139–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, T., & Sedlmeier, P. (2009). From the functions of music to music preference. Psychology of Music, 37(3), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Test manual for the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Retrieved from www.schaufeli.com.Google Scholar
Schiele, B. C., Baker, A. B., & Hathaway, S. R. (1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Lancet, 63, 292–297.Google Scholar
Schlueter, J. E., Carlson, J. F., Geisinger, K. F., & Murphy, L. L. (Eds.) (2013). Pruebas Publicadas en Español: An Index of Spanish Tests in Print. Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar
Schmit, M. J., Kihm, J. A., & Robie, C. (2000). Development of a global measure of personality. Personnel Psychology, 53, 153–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human resource management review, 18, 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholderer, J., Grunert, K. G., & Brunso, K. (2005). A procedure for eliminating additive bias from cross-cultural survey data. Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
Schwabe, F., von Davier, A. A., & Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2016). Language and culture in testing. In Leong, F. T. L., Bartram, D., Cheung, F. M., Geisinger, K. F. & Iliescu, D. (2016). The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 300–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25) (pp. 1–65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Searight, H. R., & Gafford, J. (2005). Cultural diversity at the end of life: Issues and guidelines for family physicians. American Family Physician, 71(3), 515–522.Google ScholarPubMed
Sechrest, L., Fay, T., and Zaidi, S. (1972). Problems of translation in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serpell, R. (1979). How specific are perceptual skills? A cross-cultural study of pattern reproduction. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 365–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serpell, R. (2011). Social responsibility as a dimension of intelligence, and as an educational goal: Insights from programmatic research in an African Society.Child Development Perspectives, 5, 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serpell, R., & Jere-Folotiya, J. (2008). Developmental assessment, cultural context, gender, and schooling in Zambia. International Journal of Psychology, 43(2), 88–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shealy, R., & Stout, W. (1993). A model-based standardization differences and detects test bias/DIF as well as item bias/DIF. Psychometrika, 58, 159–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shebani, M. F. A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2008). Memory development in Libyan and Dutch school children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(4), 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, L. A. (1982). Definitions of bias. In Berk, R. A. (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias (pp. 9–30). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Shepard, L. A., Kagan, S. L., & Wurtz, E. (Eds.). (1998). Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments. Washington, DC: National Goals Panel.Google Scholar
Shiomi, K., & Loo, R. (1999). Cross-cultural response styles on the Kirton Adaptation-Innovation Inventory. Social Behavior and Personality, 27(4), 413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Z. B. (2012). Saudade – a key Portuguese emotion. Emotion Review, 4(2), 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, W. L., Fleisig, W., Rabian, B., & Peterson, R. A. (1991). Childhood Anxiety Sensitivity Index. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20(2), 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, E., & Presser, S. (1989). The interviewer. In Singer, E. & Presser, S. (Eds.), Survey research methods (pp. 245–246). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Singer, J., & Loomis, M. (1984). The Singer-Loomis Inventory of Personality manual. Gresham, OR: Moving Boundaries, Inc.Google Scholar
Sireci, S. G. (1998). Gathering and analyzing content validity data. Educational Assessment, 5(4), 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sireci, S. G., & Bastari, B., Allalouf, A. (1998) Evaluating construct equivalence across adapted tests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association (106th, San Francisco, CA, August 14–18).Google Scholar
Sireci, S. G., & Geisinger, K. F. (1995). Using subject-matter experts to assess content representation: An MDS analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(3), 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sireci, S. G., & Gonzalez, E. J. (2003). Evaluating the structural equivalence of tests used in international comparisons of educational achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (Chicago, IL, April 22–24).Google Scholar
Sireci, S. G., & Khaliq, S. N. (2002). An analysis of the psychometric properties of dual language test forms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (New Orleans, LA, April 2–4).Google Scholar
Sireci, S. G., Bastari, B., & Allalouf, A. (1998). Evaluating construct equivalence across adapted tests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association (106th, San Francisco, CA, August 14–18, 1998).Google Scholar
Sireci, S. G., Fitzgerald, C., & Xing, D. (1998). Adapting credentialing examinations for international uses. Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative Research Report No. 329. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.Google Scholar
Sireci, S. G., Patsula, L., & Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Statistical methods for identifying flaws in the test adaptation process. In Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F. & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 93–116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sireci, S. G., Xing, D., & Fitzgerald, C. (1999, April). Evaluating translation DIF across multiple groups: Lessons learned from the Information Technology industry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
Sireci, S. G., Harter, J., Yang, Y., & Bhola, D. (2000). Evaluating the construct equivalence of international employee opinion surveys. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (New Orleans, LA, April 25–27).Google Scholar
Sivan, A. B. (1992). Benton Visual Retention Test, fifth edition: Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Smid, N. (2011). Personality. In Born, M., Foxcroft, C. D. & Butter, R. (Eds.), Online readings in testing and assessment, International Test Commission, www.intestcom.org/Publications/ORTA.phpGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication styles. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. B. (2011). Communication styles as dimensions of national culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 216–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. W. (2004). Developing and evaluating cross-national survey instruments. In Presser, S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M., Lessler, J., Martin, E., Martin, J. & Singer, E. (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 431–452). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solano-Flores, G., Trumbull, E., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2002). Concurrent development of dual language assessments: An alternative to translating tests for linguistic minorities. International Journal of Testing, 2(2), 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, R. E. (2002). Cultural diversity in health and illness. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13(3), 197–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spielberger, C., & Vagg, P. R. (1999). Job Stress Survey: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C., Pitariu, H., Iliescu, D., Livinți, R., & Hangan, M. (2010). Manual tehnic si interpretativ pentru JSS. Cluj-Napoca: Directprint.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1988). State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory research edition. Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1999). Professional manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STAXI-2). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R, Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults: Sampler set. Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden.Google Scholar
Spies, R. A., Carlson, J. F., & Geisinger, K. F. (Eds.) (2010). The eighteenth mental measurement yearbook. Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar
Spini, D. (2003). Measurement equivalence of 10 valuetypes from the Schwartz Value Survey across 21 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, R., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report Version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ Primary Care Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1737–1744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10, 281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. R., & Drasgow, F. (2011). Constructing fake-resistant personality tests using item response theory: High-stakes personality testing with multidimensional pairwise preferences. In Ziegler, M., MacCann, C. & Roberts, R. D. (Eds.), New perspectives on faking in personality assessment (pp. 214–239). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2005). An IRT approach to constructing and scoring pairwise preference items involving stimuli on different dimensions: An application to the problem of faking in personality assessment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, D. D., & Schmitt, N. (2016). Test use in work settings. In Leong, F. T. L., Bartram, D., Cheung, F. M., Geisinger, K. F. & Iliescu, D. (2016). The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 203–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stening, B. W., & Everett, J. E. (1984). Response styles in a cross-cultural managerial study. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2004). Intelligence and culture: How culture shapes what intelligence means, and the implications for a science of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 359, 1427–1434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J., & Salter, W. (1982). Handbook of human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People’s conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D., & Love, W. (1968). A general canonical correlation index. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 160–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stöber, J. (2001). The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 859–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, Y.-H., & Wang, W.-C. (2005). Efficiency of the Mantel, generalized Mantel-Haenszel, and logistic discriminant function analysis methods in detecting differential item functioning for polytomous items. Applied Measurement in Education, 18, 313–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukin, T., Sireci, S. G., & Ong, S. L. (2015). Using bilingual examinees to evaluate the comparability of test structure across different language versions of a mathematics exam. Actualidades en Psicologia, 29(119), 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susser, E., Schwartz, S., Morabia, A., & Bromet, E. J. (2006). Psychiatric epidemiology: Searching for the causes of mental disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, J. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalay, L. B. (1981). Intercultural communication – a process model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 5, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tașcu, A., Iliescu, D., & Avram, E. (2011). Adapting and implementing the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in Romania. A look at the clinical data. PSIWORLD 2011 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 1022–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tackett, J. L., Balsis, S., Oltmanns, T. F., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). A unifying perspective on personality pathology across the life span: Developmental considerations for the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 687–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, K., Ohara, N., Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (2002). Commonalities and differences in close relationships among the Americans and Japanese: A comparison by the individualism/collectivism concept. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(5), 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzer, N. K., (1995). Cross-cultural bias in Likert-type inventories: Perfect matching factor structures and still biased? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzer, N. K., & Sim, C. Q. E. (1999). Adapting instruments for use in multiple languages and cultures: A review of the ITC guidelines for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 258–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzer, N. K., Gittler, G., & Ellis, B. B. (1995). Cross-cultural validation of item complexity in a LLTM-calibrated spatial ability test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzer, N. K., Gittler, G., & Sim, C. Q. E. (1994). A cross-cultural comparison of a Rasch calibrated spatial ability test between Austrian and Singaporean adolescents. In Bouvy, A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Boski, P. & Schmitz, P. (Eds.), Journeys into cross-cultural psychology (pp. 96–110). Lisse: Swets.Google Scholar
Tanzer, N. K., Sim, C. Q. E., & Marsh, H. W. (1992). Test applications over cultures and languages: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings. Bulletin of the International Test Commission, 19, 151–171.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1998). Continuous norming: Improved equations for the WAIS-R. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37(4), 451–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tellegen, P., Winkel, M., Wijnberg-Williams, B., & Laros, J. (2005). Snijders-Oomen Non-verbaler Intelligenztest: Manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Teng, E. L. (1996). Cross-cultural testing and the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument. In Yeo, G. & Gallagher-Thomson, D. (Eds.), Ethnicity and the dementias (pp. 77–85). Washington: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Teng, E. L., & Chui, H. C. (1987). The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) Examination. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 314–318.Google ScholarPubMed
Tervalon, M., & Murray-Garcia, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9(2), 117–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The EuroQol Group (1990). EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) (2014). UNHCR Global Trends 2013. Geneva: The United Nations Commissioner for Refugees.Google Scholar
The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) (2015). UNHCR Global Trends 2014. Geneva: The United Nations Commissioner for Refugees.Google Scholar
The WHOQOL Group (1994). The development of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In Orley, J. & Kuyken, W. (Eds.). Quality of life assessment: International perspectives (pp. 41–60). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The WHOQOL Group (1995). The World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organisation. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10). 1403–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1988). Use of item response theory in the study of group differences in trace lines. In Wainer, H. & Braun, H. I. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 147–169). Hillsdate, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1993). Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. In Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 67–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Toniolo, I. (2007). Psychiatric disorders in a transcultural setting. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 4, 160–178.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (2008). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Manual for scoring and interpreting results. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., & Sato, S. (1979). Figural creative thinking abilities of United States and Japanese majors in education. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 4, 216–221.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., Iliescu, D. Dincă, M., & Panc, I. (2008). The Torrance Tests for Creative Thinking, technical and normative manual for the Romanian form. Cluj-Napoca: Odiseea.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triandis, H. C., & Vassiliou, V. (1972). A comparative analysis of subjective culture. In Triandis, H. C. (Ed.), The analysis of subjective culture (pp. 299–335). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tripp, G., Luk, S. L., Schaughency, E. A., & Singh, R. (1999). DSM-IV and ICD-10: A comparison of the correlates of ADHD and hyperkinetic disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(2), 156–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tseng, W.-S. (2001). Handbook of cultural psychiatry. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tseng, W.-S. (2003). Clinician’s guide to cultural psychiatry. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tuchler, H., Hofmann, S., Bernhart, M., Brugiatelli, M., Chrobak, L., Franke, A., Herold, M., Holowiecki, J. Ihle, R., Jaksic, B., Krc, I., Munteanu, N., Pawlicki, M., Sakalova, A., Schranz, V., Wolf, H., & Lutz, D. (1992). A short multilingual quality of life questionnaire-practicability, reliability and interlingual homogeneity. Quality of Life Research, 1, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984). Washington, DC: Department of the Army.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, S. M., DeMers, S. T., Fox, H. R., & Reed, G. M. (2001). APA’s guidelines for test user qualifications: An executive summary. American Psychologist, 56(12), 1099–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, S. E. (2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. New York: Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Ullman, S.E., & Filipas, H. H. (2001). Predictors of PTSD symptom severity and social reactions in sexual assault victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14(2), 369–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, S. E., Starzynski, L. L., Long, S. M., Mason, G. E., & Long, L. M. (2008). Exploring the relationships of women’s sexual assault disclosure, social reactions, and problem drinking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(9), 1235–1257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Underhill, C. M., Bearden, R. M., & Chen, H. T. (2008). Evaluation of the fake resistance of a forced-choice paired – comparison computer adaptive personality measure. Technical Report No. NPRST-TR-08–2. Millington, TN: NPRST. Retrieved on August 2, 2016 from www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a484183.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), Population Division (2013). International migration report 2013. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau (2007). Census Bureau Guideline: Language Translation of Data Collection Instruments and Supporting Materials. Retrieved on 21 April, 2016 from www.census.gov.Google Scholar
Valchev, V. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Nel, J. A., Rothmann, S., Meiring, D., & De Bruin, G. P. (2011). Implicit personality conceptions of the Nguni cultural-linguistic groups of South Africa. Cross-Cultural Research, 45, 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de gaer, E., Grisay, A., Schulz, W., & Gebhardt, E. (2012). The reference group effect: An explanation of the paradoxical relationship between academic achievement and self-confidence across countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(8), 1205–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de vijver, F. J. R. (1991). Inductive thinking across cultures: An empirical investigation. Helmond: Wibro.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2009). Types of comparative studies in cross-cultural psychology. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2011a). Bias and real differences in cross-cultural differences: Neither friends nor foes. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., Chasiotis, A. & Breugelmans, S. M. (Eds.), Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 235–258). New York, NY: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2011b). Capturing bias in structural equation modeling. In Davidov, E., Schmidt, P. & Billiet, J. (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (pp. 3–34). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015a). Methodological aspects of cross-cultural research. In Gelfand, M. J., Chiu, C.-Y. & Hong, Y.-Y. (Eds.), Handbook of advances in culture psychology (Vol. 5) (pp. 101–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015b, April). Individual, group, and organizational assessment in cross-cultural settings. Keynote address presented at the 15th Conference of the Romanian Association of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Sibiu, Romania.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2016). Test adaptations. In Leong, F. T. L., Bartram, D., Cheung, F. M., Geisinger, K. F. & Iliescu, D. (2016). The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 364–376). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1(2), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997a). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H. & Pandey, J. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd. ed.) (pp. 257–300). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In Matsumoto, D. R. & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 17–45). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. (2005). Conceptual and methodological issues in adapting tests. In Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F. & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 39–64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (1997). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 263–279.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 54, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., Chasiotis, A., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2011). Fundamental questions of cross-cultural psychology. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., Chasiotis, A. & Breugelmans, S. M. (Eds.), Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 9–34). New York, NY: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bos, G. (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Van haaften, E. H., & van de vijver, F. J. R. (1996). Psychological consequences of environmental degradation. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 411–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Hemert, D. A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Poortinga, Y. H., & Georgas, J. (2000). Structure and score levels of the Eysenck Personality Inventory across individuals and countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(8), 1229–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hemert, D. A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Poortinga, Y. H., & Georgas, J. (2002). Structural and functional equivalence of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire within and between countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1229–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Herk, H., Poortinga, Y. H., & Verhallen, T. M. M. (2004). Response styles in rating scales: Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Iddekinge, C. H., Putka, D. J., & Campbell, J. C. (2011). Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: The validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 13–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Leest, P. F. (1997). Bias and equivalence research in the Netherlands. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 319–329.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of an improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5(2), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varni, J. W., Limbers, C. A., & Newman, D. A. (2009). Using factor analysis to confirm the validity of children’s self-reported health-related quality of life across different modes of administration. Clinical Trials, 6, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vassiliou, V. G., & Vassiliou, G. (1973). The implicative meaning of the Greek concept of Philotimo. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4(3), 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor-analysis - some further observations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(1), 97-114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Virga, D., Zaborila, C., Sulea, C., & Maricutoiu, L. (2009). Adaptarea în limba română a Scalei Utrecht de măsurare a implicării în muncă: examinarea validitatii și a fidelitatii. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 6(1), 58–74.Google Scholar
Voncken, L., Albers, C. J., & Timmerman, M. E. (2016). Continuous norming of psychological tests: A comparison of different stepwise model selection procedures. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Test Commission, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
von Davier, A. (2010). Potential solutions to practical equating issues. In Dorans, N. J., Pommerich, M., & Holland, P. E. (Eds.). Linking and aligning scores and scales (pp. 89–106). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Vulliamy, G. (1990) Research outcomes: PostScript. In Vulliamy, G., Lewin, K. and Stephens, D., Doing educational research in developing countries. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Walker, C. (2011). What’s the DIF? Why differential item functioning analyses are an important part of instrument development and validation. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warr, P. (1990). The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Revised. New York (NY): Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - fifth edition: Technical and interpretive manual. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
Wechsler, S. M. (2003). Assessing Brazilian creativity with Torrance Tests. In Stein, M. S. (Ed.), Creativity global correspondents (pp. 8–14). New York: Winslow Press.Google Scholar
Wechsler, S., & Richmond, B. (1982). Creative strengths of Brazilian and American children. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 16, 27–32.Google Scholar
Weidmer, B. (1994). Issues and guidelines for translation in cross-cultural research. In American Statistical Association, proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section (pp. 1226–1231). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
Weissman, M. M., Bland, R. C., Canino, G. J., Faravelli, C., Greenwald, S., Hwu, H. G., Joyce, P. R., Karam, E. G., Lee, C. K., Lellouch, J., Lepine, J. P., Newman, S. C., Rubio-Stipec, M., Wells, J. E., Wickramaratne, P. J., Wittchen, H., & Yeh, E. K. (1996). Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder, Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The Role-based Performance Scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 540–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J., Billiet, J., & Cambre, B. (2003) Adjustment for acquiescence in the assessment of the construct equivalence of Likert-type score items. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(6), 702–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, G. S., & Barron, F. (1963). Barron-Welsh Art Scale: A portion of the Welsh Figure Preference Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Welsh, G. S., Gough, H. B., Hall, W. B., & Bradley, P. (1987). Manual for the Barron-Welsh Art Scale. Menlo Park, CA: Mindgarden.Google Scholar
Werner, O., & Campbell, D. T. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In Naroll, R. & Cohen, R. (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 398–420). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide Range Achievement Test 4: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Willgerodt, M. A., Kataoka-Yahiro, M., Kim, E., & Ceria, C. (2005). Issues of instrument translation in research on Asian immigrant populations. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(4), 231–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, G. (1994). Cognitive interviewing and questionnaire design: A training manual. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
Willis, G. B., & Lessler, J. (1999). Question Appraisal System QAS99. Berkeley, CA: Research Triangle Institute.Google Scholar
Willis, G. B., & Schechter, S. (1999). A comparison of cognitive interviewing, expert review, and behavior coding: What do they tell us? Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods of the American Statistical Assocation, 28–37. Retrieved on August 30, 2016 from www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/papers.Google Scholar
Wittes, J., & Wallenstein, S. (1993). The power of the Mantel-Haenszel Test. Biometrics, 49 (4), 1077–1087.Google Scholar
Word, C. O. (1977). Cross-cultural methods for survey research in Black urban areas. Journal of Black Psychology, 3, 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2012). Gender Statistics Highlights from 2012 World Development Report: World DataBank, a compilation of databases by the World Bank. Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). (1973). Report of the International Pilot Study on Schizophrenia. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (1993a). Measurement of quality of life in children: Report of WHO/IACAPAP Working Party. Geneva: Division of Mental Health, World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (1993b). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2007). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th Revision. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). (2014). Global status report on alcohol and health 2014. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2016). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Retrieved on August 4, 2016 from www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en.Google Scholar
Yang, K.-S. (1997). Theories and research in Chinese personality: An indigenous approach. In Kao, H. S. R. & Sinha, D. (Eds.), Asian perspectives on psychology (pp. 236–262). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S., & Bond, M. H. (1990). Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1087–1095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yun, H. S. (1992). Cultural relativity vs. universality in the social concepts on intelligence. The Journal of Studies in Education, 2, 181–198.Google Scholar
Zachary, R. A., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1985). Continuous norming: implications for the WAIS-R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41(1), 86–94.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zevon, M. A., & Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, A. Y., Snowden, L. R., & Sue, S. (1998) Differences between Asian- and White-Americans’ help-seeking and utilization patterns in the Los Angeles area, Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 317–326.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, S., & & Zhang, D. (2008). The totality of Chinese characters: A digital perspective. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing, 17(2), 107–125.Google Scholar
Zhu, J., & Chen, H.-Y. (2011). Utility of inferential norming with smaller sample sizes. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(6), 570–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubrzycki, G. (2010). National culture, national identity, and the culture(s) of the nation. In Grindstaff, L., Hall, J. R. & Lo, M.-C. (Eds.). Sociology of culture: A handbook (pp. 514–529). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zuilkowski, S. S., McCoy, D. C., Serpell, R., Matafwali, B., & Fink, G. (2016). Dimensionality and the development of cognitive assessments for children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.Google Scholar
Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Three generations of DIF analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(2), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zumbo, D., Sireci, G. S., & Hambleton, R. K. (2003). Re-visiting exploratory methods for construct comparability: Is there something to be gained from the ways of old? Presented in the symposium Construct Comparability Research: Methodological Issues and Results (National Council on Measurement in Education meetings), April 2003, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Zwick, R. (1990). When do item response function and Mantel-Haenszel definitions of differential item functioning coincide? Journal of Educational Statistics, 15(3), 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwick, R. (1991). Effects of item order and context on estimation of NAEP reading proficiency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10, 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Dragoş Iliescu
  • Book: Adapting Tests in Linguistic and Cultural Situations
  • Online publication: 23 October 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316273203.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Dragoş Iliescu
  • Book: Adapting Tests in Linguistic and Cultural Situations
  • Online publication: 23 October 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316273203.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Dragoş Iliescu
  • Book: Adapting Tests in Linguistic and Cultural Situations
  • Online publication: 23 October 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316273203.016
Available formats
×