Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era
  4. Volume 14
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 14 - April 2015

Contents

Page 3 of 5

Teaching Forum: Pedagogy and Controversy in The New Advanced Placement U.S. History Framework

Book Reviews

Forum: Indigenous Histories of The Gilded Age and Progressive Era

Teaching Forum

Book Reviews

Teaching Forum: Pedagogy and Controversy in The New Advanced Placement U.S. History Framework

Book Reviews

Teaching Forum

Book Reviews

Teaching Forum: Pedagogy and Controversy in The New Advanced Placement U.S. History Framework

Teaching Forum

Book Reviews

Teaching Forum

Public Engagement

  • ANTI-CORRUPTION IN AMERICAN HISTORY

  • Richard L. McCormick
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    22 July 2015, pp. 441-454

  • What will it take to get Americans to do something about political corruption? I mean the deep corruption of politics and policy now caused by massive campaign contributions, by lobbyists who bundle those contributions for political candidates and then influence the policy decisions of elected officials, by the revolving door between public office and lucrative private employment, and—through all these instruments and more—by the influence of wealthy individuals and interests over the agencies and institutions of government. Some people say this is just American politics as usual: money is inevitable in public life, and anyway it's all perfectly legal. Sadly, those who say this are, at this moment, winning the argument. Writing for the Supreme Court majority in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), Justice Anthony Kennedy opined, “It is well understood that a substantial and legitimate reason, if not the only reason, to cast a vote for, or to make a contribution to, one candidate over another is that the candidate will respond by producing those political outcomes the supporter favors. Democracy is premised on responsiveness.” Cementing the case, says the Court, is the First Amendment, which protects political speech and political dollars.

Page 3 of 5