Attention is drawn to the fact that neither astronomical observations, nor laboratory data can, as yet, sufficiently constrain models of the origin and evolution of the solar system. But, if correctly approached and interpreted, the magnetic remanence of meteorites could help in constructing a self-consistent model.
In the context of various models for the early evolution of a solar nebula, the possible roles assigned to ambient magnetic fields and the paleointensities required to establish the stable natural remanent magnetization (NRM in range 10-4 to 10-1 cgsm) observed in meteorites, are discussed. It is suggested that the record of paleofields present during condensation, growth, and accumulation of grains is likely to have been preserved as chemical (CRM) or thermochemical (TCRM) remanence in unaltered meteoritic material. This interpretation of the meteoritic NRM is made plausible by experimental and theoretical results from the contiguous fields of rock magnetism, magnetic materials, interstellar grains, etc. Several arguments (such as the anisotropy of susceptibility in chondrites, suggesting alignment of elongated ferromagnetic grains, or the characteristic sizes and morphology of carrier phases of remanence, etc.) as well as general evidence from meteoritics (cooling rates, chemical and mineralogical data) can be used to challenge the interpretation of NRM as thermo-remanence (TRM) acquired on a “planetary” parent body during cooling of magnetic mineral phases through the Curie point in fields of 0.2 to 0.9 Oe.
Fine-particle theories appear adequate for treating meteoritic remanence, if models based on corresponding types of permanent magnet materials, e.g., powder-ferrites for chondrites; diffusion hardened alloys for iron meteorites, are adopted, as suggested here.
Finally, a potentially fruitful sequence of experiments is suggested for separating the useful component of NRM in determining the paleofield intensity and its time evolution.