Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and midline catheters (MC) are widely used for intravenous infusions in oncology and critically ill patients. However, controversy remains regarding which method is superior. This meta-analysis systematically compares the safety differences between these 2 methods of intravenous catheterization.

Eligible studies comparing PICC and MC were identified through searches in 6 databases. Thrombosis is the primary endpoint, while secondary endpoints include other complications, cost, and satisfaction rate.

Fourteen studies with 20,675 patients were analyzed. Based on patient data, the MC group exhibited higher rates of catheter-related superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) (risk ratio [RR]: 0.42 [0.28, 0.64]), infiltrations (RR: 0.27 [0.12, 0.62]), and leaks (RR: 0.16 [0.05, 0.53]). In contrast, the PICC group had more catheter-related bloodstream infections (RR: 1.95 [1.15, 3.32]). Considering catheter days, the MC group showed increased total complications (RR: 0.51 [0.26, 0.99]), catheter-related thrombosis (deep vein thrombosis [DVT]+SVT) (RR: 0.41 [0.18, 0.95]), and leaks (RR: 0.17 [0.05, 0.64]). In the PICC group, the top 3 complications were catheter occlusions (20 per 1,000 catheter days [CDs]), pain (15 per 1,000 CDs), and phlebitis (11 per 1,000 CDs); for the MC group, they were leaks (33 per 1,000 CDs), premature removals (22 per 1,000 CDs), and catheter-related DVT (22 per 1,000 CDs). Additionally, the PICC group had higher dissatisfaction rates (RR: 4.77 [2.33, 9.77]) and increased costs.

Compared to MC, PICC appears to be a safer intravenous catheterization option for adult patients, exhibiting fewer complications. However, the higher associated costs and lower satisfaction rates of PICC warrant serious attention.

To determine the regional impact of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MRDOs) and Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) among a tertiary care hospital and surrounding facilities including long-term care facilities (LTCFs).

Retrospective cohort study.

Patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital from July 2019 to July 2021 were recruited if their clinically collected cultures grew the following pathogens: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance, Carbapenem-resistant Enterobaterales, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, and C. difficile. Patient characteristics including admission and discharge pathway were collected. For the isolates of MRSA, ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli), and C. difficile, a molecular epidemiological analysis was conducted, utilizing the PCR-based Open-Reading Frame Typing (POT) method.

Three hundred-five patients were identified with a total of 332 culture specimens of the target pathogens. The top three were 132 MRSA isolates (43.3%, out of 305), 97 ESBL E. coli (31.8%), and 32 ESBL Enterobacterales (non-E. coli) (10.5%). The target pathogens were more detectable within 3 days among patients admitted from LTCFs or other hospitals than those admitted from home (Odds Ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 2.8-7.6, p-value < 0.001). The molecular epidemiological analysis suggested the transmissions of MRSA, ESBL E. coli and C. difficile occurred 52 out of 111 patients within the in-hospital environment, and 7 out of 128 within the prehospital environment, respectively.

MDROs/C. difficile transmission is prevalent within a tertiary care hospital and further complicated by its inter-facility transmission across surrounding LTCFs and hospitals in Japan.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are an urgent threat to healthcare, but the epidemiology of these antimicrobial-resistant organisms may be evolving in some settings since the COVID-19 pandemic. An updated analysis of hospital-acquired CRE (HA-CRE) incidence in community hospitals is needed.

We retrospectively analyzed data on HA-CRE cases and antimicrobial utilization (AU) from two community hospital networks, the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network (DICON) and the Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON) from January 2013 to June 2023. The zero-inflated negative binomial regression model was used owing to excess zeros.

126 HA-CRE cases from 36 hospitals were included in the longitudinal analysis. The pooled incidence of HA CRE was 0.69 per 100,000 patient days (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.57–0.82 HA-CRE rate significantly decreased over time before COVID-19 (rate ratio [RR], 0.94 [95% CI, 0.89–0.99]; p = 0.02), but there was a significant slope change indicating a trend increase in HA-CRE after COVID-19 (RR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.06–1.66]; p = 0.01). In 21 hospitals participating in both DICON and DASON from January 2018 to June 2023, there was a correlation between HA-CRE rates and AU for CRE treatment (Spearman’s coefficient = 0.176; p < 0.01). Anti-CRE AU did not change over time, and there was no level or slope change after COVID.

The incidence of HA-CRE decreased before COVID-19 in a network of community hospitals in the southeastern United States, but this trend was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Post-procedural antimicrobial prophylaxis is not recommended by professional guidelines but is commonly prescribed. We sought to reduce use of post-procedural antimicrobials after common endoscopic urologic procedures.

A before-after, quasi-experimental trial with a baseline (July 2020–June 2022), an implementation (July 2022), and an intervention period (August 2022–July 2023).

Three participating medical centers.

We assessed the effect of a bundled intervention on excess post-procedural antimicrobial use (ie, antimicrobial use on post-procedural day 1) after three types of endoscopic urologic procedures: ureteroscopy and transurethral resection of bladder tumor or prostate. The intervention consisted of education, local champion(s), and audit-and-feedback of data on the frequency of post-procedural antimicrobial-prescribing.

1,272 procedures were performed across all 3 sites at baseline compared to 525 during the intervention period; 644 (50.6%) patients received excess post-procedural antimicrobials during the baseline period compared to 216 (41.1%) during the intervention period. There was no change in the use of post-procedural antimicrobials at sites 1 and 2 between the baseline and intervention periods. At site 3, the odds of prescribing a post-procedural antimicrobial significantly decreased during the intervention period relative to the baseline time trend (0.09; 95% CI 0.02–0.45). There was no significant increase in post-procedural unplanned visits at any of the sites.

Implementation of a bundled intervention was associated with reduced post-procedural antimicrobial use at one of three sites, with no increase in complications. These findings demonstrate both the safety and challenge of guideline implementation for optimal perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.

This trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04196777.

Racial and ethnic variations in antibiotic utilization are well-reported in outpatient settings but little is known about inpatient settings. Our objective was to describe national inpatient antibiotic utilization among children by race and ethnicity.

This study included hospital visit data from the Pediatric Health Information System between 01/01/2022 and 12/31/2022 for patients <20 years. Primary outcomes were the percentage of hospitalization encounters that received an antibiotic and antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days. Mixed-effect regression models were used to determine the association of race-ethnicity with outcomes, adjusting for covariates.

There were 846,530 hospitalizations. 45.2% of children were Non-Hispanic (NH) White, 27.1% were Hispanic, 19.2% were NH Black, 4.5% were NH Other, 3.5% were NH Asian, 0.3% were NH Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander (NHPI) and 0.2% were NH American Indian. Adjusting for covariates, NH Black children had lower odds of receiving antibiotics compared to NH White children (aOR 0.96, 95%CI 0.94–0.97), while NH NHPI had higher odds of receiving antibiotics (aOR 1.16, 95%CI 1.05–1.29). Children who were Hispanic, NH Asian, NH American Indian, and children who were NH Other received antibiotic DOT compared to NH White children, while NH NHPI children received more antibiotic DOT.

Antibiotic utilization in children’s hospitals differs by race and ethnicity. Hospitals should assess policies and practices that may contribute to disparities in treatment; antibiotic stewardship programs may play an important role in promoting inpatient pharmacoequity. Additional research is needed to examine individual diagnoses, clinical outcomes, and drivers of variation.

To describe the effect of a Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) respiratory culture nudge on antibiotic use in colonized patients.

IRB-approved quasi-experiment.

Five acute-care hospitals in Michigan.

Adult patients with SM respiratory culture between 01/01/2022 and 01/27/2023 (pre-nudge) and 03/27/2023–12/31/2023 (post-nudge). Patients with active community/hospital/ventilator-acquired pneumonia or who received SM-targeted antibiotics at the time of culture were excluded.

A nudge comment was implemented 02/2023 stating: “S. maltophilia is a frequent colonizer of the respiratory tract. Clinical correlation for infection is required. Colonizers do not require antibiotic treatment.” The primary outcome was no treatment with SM-therapy; secondary outcomes were treatment with SM-therapy ≥72 hrs, length of stay, and in-hospital, all-cause mortality. Safety outcomes included antibiotic-associated adverse drug events (ADEs).

94 patients were included: 53 (56.4%) pre- and 41 (43.6%) post-nudge. Most patients were men (53, 56.4%), had underlying lung disease (61, 64.8%), and required invasive ventilatory support (70, 74.5%). Eleven (11.7%) patients resided in a long-term care facility. No treatment with SM therapy was observed in 13 (23.1%) pre- versus 32 (78.0%) post-nudge patients (P <0.001). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. Antibiotic-associated ADEs were common (33/41, 76%) in patients who received ≥72hrs of SM-therapy: fluid overload (18, 44%), hyponatremia (17, 42%), elevated SCr (12, 29%), hyperkalemia (5, 12%). After adjustment for confounders, post-nudge was associated with 11-fold increased odds of no treatment with SM-therapy (adjOR, 11.72; 95%CI, 4.18–32.83).

A targeted SM nudge was associated with a significant reduction in treatment of colonization, with similar patient outcomes. SM-treated patients frequently developed antibiotic-associated ADEs.

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels for stool testing may be used to diagnose Clostridioides difficile, which can circumvent more appropriate targeted C. difficile testing, resulting in treatment of incidentally detected colonization. We sought to reduce C. difficile diagnosis via a gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GIPP).

Quasi-experimental, pre/post, retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2022, to January 31, 2024.

Mayo Clinic Arizona—a single academic medical center and associated clinics.

Adult patients receiving C. difficile testing and/or treatment.

Preferred C. difficile testing consisted of glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin antigen immunoassay, followed by toxin gene testing for discrepant results. The GIPP contained 22 targets during the baseline period with C. difficile removed during the postintervention period. Surveys were provided to provider and nursing groups, separately, to identify C. difficile ordering practices and knowledge gaps.

At baseline, from January 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023, 2,772 GIPPs were completed for 2,307 unique patients (∼7 per day), primarily for outpatients (1,805 of 2,772, 65%). The most common positive target was C. difficile (517 of 1,018, 51%), which resulted in treatment for C. difficile infection in 94.9% (337 of 355) of cases. Following GIPP C. difficile target removal, GIPP orders decreased from 3.23 to 2.7 per 1,000 patient visits (P < .001). Prescribing of C. difficile treatments decreased in the postintervention period in inpatient and outpatient settings. There were no cases of delayed C. difficile diagnosis during the postintervention period.

Removing C. difficile from the GIPP resulted in effective diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship without resulting in delayed diagnoses.

To better delineate multiplexed gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panel (MGPP) diagnostic and therapeutic stewardship for patients undergoing treatment for acute leukemia including indications and benefits of testing, optimal timing, and interpretation of results.

We retrieved all MGPP ordered on 662 consecutive patients admitted with newly diagnosed acute leukemia between June 2015 and May 2024.

Regional referral center for acute leukemia.

Fifty-one (17%) of 305 MGPP obtained on the 198 patients who underwent testing identified at least one and 4 (1%) more than one diarrheagenic pathogen. The probability of a positive result was greater if obtained as an outpatient [20/52(38%)], but was not related to type of leukemia, sex, or age. Among the positive results, the pathogens identified included Clostridioides difficile (78% of tests), norovirus (16%), diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (6%), adenovirus 40/41 (4%), and Giardia lamblia (4%). The results of 30 of the 305 tests resulted in a change in treatment (28 C. difficile, 2 G. lamblia). For the MGPP C. difficile results with an accompanying toxin determination, this included treatment following 16/19 tests with a positive toxin result and 11/19 with a negative. Actionable results other than C. difficile were rarely seen in the inpatient population.

MGPP testing is most useful when administered as an outpatient and of little benefit for inpatients with hospital-onset diarrhea. Since MGPP is sensitive and does not distinguish between colonization and causes of diarrhea, caution is needed in interpretation of results, especially for toxin-negative C. difficile.

To compare the effectiveness of universal admission testing (UAT) and risk-based testing (RBT) in preventing nosocomial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after the implementation of strict infection control measures.

Retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Five community hospitals in Japan.

14,028 adult patients admitted emergently from June 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023.

We calculated crude incidence density rates of community-acquired COVID-19 (positive test ≤4 days postadmission), hospital-acquired COVID-19 (positive test ≥8 days postadmission), total postadmission COVID-19 (all cases of positive test postadmission), and primary cases (sporadic and index cases). A generalized estimating equation model was used to adjust for local incidence (new COVID-19 patients per 100,000 population), single-bed room proportion, and admission proportion of patients older than 65 years.

The weekly local incidence in the study areas was less than 1,800 per 100,000 population (1.8%). Two hospitals implemented RBT and 3 implemented UAT. The median admission testing rate was higher in the UAT group than in the RBT group (95% vs 55%; difference 45.2%, 95% CI, 40.3%–48.8%). Crude and adjusted analyses revealed no significant associations between incidence density rates (IRR; >1 indicates higher incidence with UAT) and admission strategies for any of the outcomes: community-acquired cases (adjusted IRR = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.46–3.31), hospital-acquired cases (1.46; 0.80–2.66), total postadmission COVID-19 (1.22; 0.79–1.87), and primary cases (0.81; 0.59–1.12).

Compared with risk-based testing, universal admission testing may have limited additional benefits in preventing nosocomial COVID-19 transmission during a period of low-moderate local incidence.

SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic surveillance testing (AST) is a common strategy to minimize the risk of nosocomial infection in patients and healthcare personnel. In contrast to admission screening, post-admission AST was less widely adopted.

This study describes the diagnostic yield of post-admission serial SARS-COV-2 testing in hospitalized patients at a large cancer center with mostly double-occupancy rooms.

Retrospective cohort study design. Post-admission SARS-CoV-2 tests were examined over a 18 month study period. Positive results were reviewed to determine true hospital-onset infections using a combination criteria of screening all sample cycle threshold (Ct) values >30, results of non-concordant repeat testing, and clinical symptoms.

Post-admission serial testing of 15,048 hospitalized patients during an 18-month study period at a tertiary care cancer center detected hospital-onset infection in 1.6% (n = 245 patients). Among all hospital-onset positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA tests, 13% were clinically false positive. Most true infections were mild to moderate in severity.

In summary, post-admission serial testing in a high-risk setting is a low-yield strategy with several unfavorable effects and should no longer be routinely applied.