Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:48:43.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rationale of rationalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

Walter Veit Open the ORCID record for Walter Veit [Opens in a new window] ,
Joe Dewhurst ,
Krzysztof Dołęga ,
Max Jones ,
Shaun Stanley ,
Keith Frankish  and
Daniel C. Dennett
Walter Veit
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]://walterveit.com/http://www.maxjonesphilosophy.com/
Joe Dewhurst
Affiliation:
MCMP, LMU Munich, 80539Munich, Germany. [email protected]://joedewhurst.weebly.com/
Krzysztof Dołęga
Affiliation:
Institut für Philosophie 2, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801Bochum. [email protected]://www.krysdolega.xyz/
Max Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]://walterveit.com/http://www.maxjonesphilosophy.com/
Shaun Stanley
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]://walterveit.com/http://www.maxjonesphilosophy.com/
Keith Frankish
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, SheffieldS10 2TN, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.keithfrankish.com/
Daniel C. Dennett
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University, Medford, MA02155. [email protected]://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/dennett/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While we agree in broad strokes with the characterisation of rationalization as a “useful fiction,” we think that Fiery Cushman's claim remains ambiguous in two crucial respects: (1) the reality of beliefs and desires, that is, the fictional status of folk-psychological entities and (2) the degree to which they should be understood as useful. Our aim is to clarify both points and explicate the rationale of rationalization.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e53
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Churchland, P. M. (1981) Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78(2):67–90.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. (1986) Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind/brain. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2011) Homunculi rule: Reflections on Darwinian populations and natural selection by Peter Godfrey-Smith. Biology & Philosophy 26:475–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2019) Clever evolution [Review of Samir Okasha's Agents and goals in evolution, Oxford University Press, 2018]. Metascience 28(3):355–58. (Advance online publication). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-019-00450-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankish, K. (2004) Mind and supermind. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, S. (2018) Agents and goals in evolution. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarnita, C. E. (2017) The ecology and evolution of social behavior in microbes. Journal of Experimental Biology 220:18–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veit, W. (2019) Evolution of multicellularity: Cheating done right. Biology & Philosophy 34:34. (Online first). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9688-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2017) From bacteria to Bach and back: The evolution of minds. WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar