Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:55:11.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Paul Johnson
Paul Johnson
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Making the Market
Victorian Origins of Corporate Capitalism
 , pp. 234 - 249
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Report of the Select Committee on the Weavers' Petition, PP 1810–11 ii, 1.
Fifth Report of the Commissioners on the Courts of Common Law, PP 1833 (247).
Report on the Law of Partnership by Mr Bellenden Ker, reprinted as Appendix I of the First Report of the Select Committee on Joint Stock Companies, PP 1844 vii.
Select Committee on Investments for the Savings of the Middle and Working Classes, PP 1850 xix.
Select Committee on the Law of Partnership, PP 1851 xviii.
House of Lords Select Committee on the Bankruptcy Bill, PP 1852–3 xxii.
Royal Commission on the Assimilation of Mercantile Laws in the UK and Amendments in the Law of Partnership, as Regards the Question of Limited or Unlimited Responsibility, PP 1854 xxvii.
Select Committee on the State of the Laws as Regards Contracts of Service between Master and Servant, PP 1865 viii and 1866 xiii.
Return of the Questions Addressed by the Committee of County Court Judges to the Judges of Those Courts, on County Court Commitments, PP 1867 lvii.
Select Committee on Imprisonment for Debt, PP 1873 xv.
Select Committee on the Companies Acts 1862 and 1867, PP 1877 viii.
Report of the Royal Commission on the Stock Exchange, PP 1878 xix.
Report of the Chief Registrar of Friendly Societies for 1880. Part IIB, app. I pp 1883 lxviii.
Report on the Royal Liver Friendly Society, PP 1886 lxi.
Select Committee on the Friendly Societies Act, appendix 1. PP 1889 x.
House of Lords Select Committee on the Debtors Act, PP 1893–4 (HL) ix.
Report on Company Law Amendment Act, [Cd 3052], 1906 xcvii.
Annual Return Relating to Joint Stock Companies for 1906, PP 1907 lxxvi.
Select Committee on Debtors (Imprisonment) PP 1909 vii.
,A Member of the Institute of Actuaries, The Government Annuities Bill: A letter to the Rt. Hon. W.E. Gladstone, London, 1864.Google Scholar
,A Practical Jobber. The System of Stock-Jobbing Explained, London, 1816.Google Scholar
Abel-Smith, B. and Stevens, R.Lawyers and the Courts: A Sociological Study of the English Legal System, 1750–1965, London, 1967.Google Scholar
Addison, C. G.A Treatise on the Law of Contracts and Parties to Actions ex contractu, London, 1845.Google Scholar
Aitken, J.Pride and Perjury, London, 2000.Google Scholar
Alborn, T. ‘The moral of the failed bank: professional plots in the Victorian money market’, Victorian Studies, 38, 199–226, 1995.Google Scholar
Alborn, T.Conceiving Companies: Joint-Stock Politics in Victorian England, London, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H. ‘Production, information costs, and economic organisation’, American Economic Review, 57, 777–95, 1972.Google Scholar
Allen, J.Where Shall I Get the Most for My Money?, London, 1880.Google Scholar
Amsler, C. E., Bartlett, R. L. and Bolton, C. J. ‘Thoughts of some British economists on early limited liability and corporate legislation’, History of Political Economy, 13, 774–93, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. M. and Tollison, R. D. ‘Adam Smith's analysis of joint-stock companies’, Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1237–56, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Anon. The Calumnious Aspersions Contained in the Report of the Sub-Committee of the Stock-Exchange Exposed and Refuted, London, 1814.Google Scholar
,Anon. The Case of Thomas Lord Cochrane, Edinburgh, 1814.Google Scholar
,Anon. Letter to the Electors of Westminster on the Case of Lord Cochrane, London, 1814.Google Scholar
,Anon. The Trial of Lord Cochrane, London, 1814.Google Scholar
,Anon. How to Make Money; or Hints to Speculators, Birmingham, 1857.Google Scholar
,Anon. Responsibilities of Directors and Promoters, London, 1873.Google Scholar
Anson, Sir W. R.Principles of the English Law of Contract, Oxford, 1879.Google Scholar
Arthurs, H. W. ‘“Without the law”: courts of local and special jurisdiction in nineteenth century England’, Journal of Legal History, 5, 130–49, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinall, A. ‘The Westminster election of 1814’, English Historical Review, xl, 562–9, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, P. S.The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract, Oxford, 1979.Google Scholar
Atlay, J. B.The Trial of Lord Cochrane before Lord Ellenborough, London, 1897.Google Scholar
Babbage, C.A Comparative View of the Various Institutions for the Assurance of Lives, London, 1826.Google Scholar
Baily, F.An Account of the Several Life Assurance Companies Established in London, London, 1811.Google Scholar
Bain, G. and Price, R.Profiles of Union Growth, Oxford, 1980.Google Scholar
Bakan, J.The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, London, 2004.Google Scholar
Banks, J. A. ‘The way they lived then: Anthony Trollope and the 1870s’, Victorian Studies, 12, 177–200, 1968.Google Scholar
Barber, B. ‘Absolutization of the market: some notes on how we got from here to there’. In G. Dworkin, G. Bermant and P. G. Brown (eds.), Markets and Morals, Washington, DC, 15–31, 1977.Google Scholar
Barnett, A. T.Why are Betting and Gambling Wrong?, London, 1897.Google Scholar
Barrister, A.Overend, Gurney & Co. (Limited): A Plain Statement of the Case, London, 1867.Google Scholar
Barton, J. L. ‘The enforcement of hard bargains’, Law Quarterly Review, 103, 1987.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. B. and Miranti, P. J.A History of Corporate Finance, Cambridge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A. ‘The fire of London’. In his The Loot of the Cities, London, 1905.Google Scholar
Berg, M. ‘What difference did women's work make to the Industrial Revolution?’, History Workshop, 35, 22–44, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C.The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York, 1933.CrossRef
Biagini, E. F. 1987, ‘British trade unions and popular political economy, 1860–1880’, Historical Journal, 30, 811–40, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagini, E. F.Liberty, Retrenchment and Reform: Popular Liberalism in the Age of Gladstone, 1860–1880, Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
Black, B. ‘Age and earnings’. In Gregory, M. B. and Thomson, A. W. J., A Portrait of Pay, 1970–1982: An Analysis of the New Earnings Survey, Oxford, 274–98, 1990.Google Scholar
Blackstone, Sir W.Commentaries on the Laws of England, Oxford, 1865–9.Google Scholar
Blaug, M.Economic Theory in Retrospect, London, 1964.Google Scholar
Boose, M. A. ‘Agency theory and alternative predictions for life insurers: an empirical test’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 57, 499–518, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boot, H. M. and Maindonald, J. H. ‘New estimates of age- and sex-specific earnings and the male-female earnings gap in the British cotton industry, 1833–1906’, Economic History Review, 61, 380–408, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, K.Palmerston: The Early Years 1784–1841, London, 1982.Google Scholar
Bower, T.Maxwell: The Outsider, London, 1988.Google Scholar
Bower, T.Maxwell: The Final Verdict, London, 1995.Google Scholar
Briggs, A.The Novels of Harold Frederic, Ithaca, NY, 1969.Google Scholar
Brooks, C.Lawyers, Litigation and English Society since 1450, London, 1998.Google Scholar
Bryer, R. A. ‘The late nineteenth-century revolution in financial reporting: Accounting for the rise of investor or managerial capitalism?’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18, 649–90, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryer, R. A.‘The Mercantile Laws Commission of 1854 and the political economy of limited liability’, Economic History Review, 50, 37–56, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunyon, C. J.On the Liquidation of an Insolvent Life Office, London, 1870.Google Scholar
Burnette, J. ‘An investigation of the female-male wage gap during the industrial revolution in Britain’, Economic History Review, 50, 257–81, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnette, J.Gender, Work and Wages in Industrial Revolution Britain, Cambridge, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, G. G. ‘The economic analysis of labor market discrimination: a survey’. In O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 1, Amsterdam, 693–785, 1986.Google Scholar
Cairnes, J. E.Some Leading Principles of Political Economy, London, 1874.Google Scholar
Capaldi, N.John Stuart Mill: A Biography, Cambridge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr-Saunders, A. M. and Wilson, P. A.The Professions, Oxford, 1933.Google Scholar
Chadwick, E. ‘Results of different principles of legislation and administration in Europe, of competition for the field, as compared with competition within the field, of service’, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 22, 381–420, 1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A.The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, MA, 1977.Google Scholar
Cheffins, B. ‘History and the global corporate governance revolution: the UK perspective’, Business History, 43, 87–118, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiozza Money, L. G.Riches and Poverty, London, 1906.Google Scholar
Christie, R.Letter to the Right Hon. Joseph W. Henley, M.P., Regarding Life Assurance Institutions, Edinburgh, 1852.Google Scholar
Clapham, J. H.An Economic History of Modern Britain, vol. II: Free Trade and Steel, Cambridge, 1926.Google Scholar
Clapham, J. H.The Bank of England: A History, Cambridge, 1944.Google Scholar
Clements, R. V. ‘British trade unions and popular political economy, 1850–1875’, Economic History review, 14, 93–104, 1961–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocks, R. C. J.Sir Henry Maine, Cambridge, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. ‘The history of imprisonment for debt and its relation to the development of discharge in bankruptcy’, Journal of Legal History, 3, 153–71, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colvin, A.Actuarial Figments Exploded: A Letter to the Right Hon. J.W. Henley, M.P., in Defence of Life Assurance Offices, London, 1852.Google Scholar
Conley, C. A.The Unwritten Law: Criminal Justice in Victorian Kent, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. A.Corporation, Trust and Company, Manchester, 1950.Google Scholar
Corley, T. A. B.Quaker Enterprise in Biscuits: Huntley and Palmers of Reading, 1822–1972, London, 1972.Google Scholar
Cornish, W. R. and Clark, G. de N. Law and Society in England, 1750–1950, London, 1989.Google Scholar
Cottrell, P. L.Industrial Finance, 1830–1914, London, 1980.Google Scholar
Cox, E. W.The New Law and Practice of Joint Stock Companies with and without Limited Liability, 4th edn., London, 1857.Google Scholar
Cracroft, B. ‘Analysis of the House of Commons in 1867’. In his Essays, Political and Miscellaneous, London, 1868.Google Scholar
Crew, A.Bribes and Bribery in Business, London, 1916.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. D., Rubio-Misas, J. D. and Zi, H. ‘The effect of organizational structure on efficiency: evidence from the Spanish insurance industry’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 3113–50, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. D., Weiss, M. A. and Zi, H. ‘Organizational form and efficiency: an analysis of stock and mutual property-liability insurers’, Management Science, 45, 1245–69, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, P. A. ‘Clio and the economics of QWERTY’, American Economic Review, 75, 332–7, 1985.Google Scholar
David, P. A.‘Path dependence, its critics and the quest for “historical economics”’. In P. Garrouste and S. Ioannides (eds.), Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas, Cheltenham, 15–40, 2001.Google Scholar
Berenger, C. R.The Noble Stock Jobber, London, 1816.Google Scholar
Deakin, S. and Wilkinson, F.The Law of the Labour Market, Oxford, 2005.Google Scholar
Dennett, L.A Sense of Security: 150 years of Prudential, Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
Dent, G. M.A Dialogue Showing How to Select a Life Office, Manchester, 1888.Google Scholar
Dent, G. M.How to Select a Life Office, London, 1897.Google Scholar
Derry, T. K. ‘The repeal of the apprenticeship clauses of the Statute of Apprentices’, Economic History Review, 3, 67–87, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicey, A. V.Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion During England in the Nineteenth Century, London, 1905.Google Scholar
Dickens, C.Dombey and Son, London, 1848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diggle, Archdeacon. Speculation and Gambling, London, 1899.Google Scholar
Diggle, Archdeacon. Directory of Directors for 1898, London, 1898.Google Scholar
Dod, C. R.Electoral Facts from 1832 to 1853, London, 1853.Google Scholar
Doeringer, P. and Piore, M.Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis, Lexington, MA, 1971.Google Scholar
Duguid, C.How to Read the Money Article, London, 1901.Google Scholar
Duguid, C.The Story of the Stock Exchange, London, 1901.Google Scholar
Dunlavy, C. ‘From citizens to plutocrats: nineteenth-century shareholder voting rights and theories of incorporation’. In K. Lipartito and D. Sicilia (eds.), Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture, Oxford, 66–93, 2004.Google Scholar
Dutton, H. I. and King, J. E.‘Ten Per Cent and No Surrender’: The Preston Strike, 1853–1854, Cambridge, 1981.Google Scholar
Dutton, H. I. and King, J. E.‘The limits of paternalism: the cotton tyrants of North Lancashire, 1836–54’, Social History, 7, 59–74, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwood, D. ‘Tories and markets, 1800–1850’. In M. Bevir and F. Trentmann (eds.), Markets in Historical contexts, Cambridge, 70–89, 2004.Google Scholar
Eden, Sir F.On the Policy and Expediency of Granting Insurance Charters, London, 1806.Google Scholar
Edey, H. C. and Panitpakdi, P. ‘British company accounting and the law, 1844–1900’. In Littleton, A. C. and Yamey, B. S. (eds.), Studies in the History of Accounting, Homewood, IL, 1956.Google Scholar
Edgar, A. ‘On the jurisdiction of Justices of the Peace in disputes between employers and employed arising from breach of contract’, Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, 1859, London, 1860.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R.A History of Financial Accounting, London, 1980.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R.‘Companies, corporations and accounting change, 1835–1933: a comparative study’, Accounting and Business Research, 23, 59–73, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G.The Mystery of Overend and Gurney: Adventures in the Victorian Financial Underworld, London, 2006.Google Scholar
English, H.A Complete View of the Joint Stock Companies formed during 1824 and 1825, London, 1827.Google Scholar
,Equity, and Law Life Assurance Society. Prospectus, London, 1891.Google Scholar
Essex-Crosby, A. ‘Joint-stock companies in Great Britain 1890–1930’, M.Comm thesis, University of London, 1938.
Evans, D. M.The City: or, The Physiology of London Business, London, 1845.Google Scholar
Evans, D. M.The Commercial Crisis of 1847–8, London, 1848.Google Scholar
Evans, D. M.Facts, Failures and Frauds: Revelations Financial, Mercantile, Criminal, London, 1859.Google Scholar
Feinstein, C. H. ‘The rise and fall of the Williamson curve’, Journal of Economic History, 48, 699–729, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinstein, C. H.‘New estimates of average earnings in the United Kingdom, 1880–1913’, Economic History Review, 43, 595–632, 1990.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. B. ‘The adjudication of commercial disputes and the legal system in modern England’, British Journal of Law and Society, 7, 141–57, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, M. ‘Being in debt in Dickens’ London: fact, fictional representation and the nineteenth-century prison', Journal of Victorian Culture, 1, 203–36, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, M.‘Women, consumption and coverture in England, c. 1760–1960’, Historical Journal, 39, 703–22, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, M. ‘Scotch drapers and the politics of modernity: gender, class and nationality in the Victorian tally trade’. In M. Daunton and M. Hilton (eds.), The Politics of Consumption: Material Culture and Citizenship in Europe and America, London, 89–107, 2001.Google Scholar
Finn, M.‘Victorian law, literature and history: three ships passing in the night’, Journal of Victorian Culture, 7, 134–46, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, M.The Character of Credit: Personal Debt in English Culture, 1740–1914, Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar
Floud, R. and Johnson, P.The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, 3 vols., Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar
Floud, R. and McCloskey, D.The Economic History of Britain since 1700, 2 vols., Cambridge, 1981.Google Scholar
Floud, R. and McCloskey, D.The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, 2nd edn., 3 vols., Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, J. and Millward, R.Public and Private Ownership of British Industry, 1820–1990, Oxford, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Formoy, R. R.The Historical Foundation of Modern Company Law, London, 1923.Google Scholar
Fortescue, J. W.Dundonald, London, 1895.Google Scholar
Fox, A.A History of the National Union of Boot and Shoe Operatives, 1874–1957, Oxford, 1958.Google Scholar
Francis, J.Chronicles and Characters of the Stock Exchange, London, 1855.Google Scholar
Frederic, H.The Market-Place, London, 1899.Google Scholar
Freeman, M., Pearson, R. and Taylor, J. ‘Technological change and the governance of joint-stock enterprise in the early nineteenth century: the case of coastal shipping’, Business History, 49, 573–94, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freifeld, M. ‘Technological change and the “self-acting” mule: a study of skill and the sexual division of labour’, Social History, 11, 319–43, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frow, E. and Katanka, M.1868: Year of the Unions, London, 1968.Google Scholar
Gambles, A.Protection and Politics: Conservative Economic Discourse, 1815–1852, Woodbridge, 1999.Google Scholar
Garnett, E. J. ‘Aspects of the relationship between protestant ethics and economic activity in mid-Victorian England,’ Oxford University D.Phil thesis, 1986.
Getzler, J. and Macnair, M. ‘The firm as an entity before the Companies Acts’. In P. Brand, K. Costello and W. N. Osborough, Adventures of the Law, Dublin, 267–88, 2005.Google Scholar
Getzler, J. ‘The role of security over future and circulating capital: evidence from the British economy circa 1850–1920’. In J. Getzler and J. Payne (eds.), Company Charges: Spectrum and Beyond, Oxford, 227–51, 2006.Google Scholar
Gilmore, C. and Willmott, H. ‘Company law and financial reporting: a sociological history of the UK experience’. In M. Bromwich and A. Hopwood (eds.), Accounting and the Law, London, 159–190, 1992.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. ‘Critical legal histories’, Stanford Law Review 36, 57–125, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, C.The Banker's Wife, London, 1843.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmith, G. and W. The Diary of a Nobody, Bristol, 1892.Google Scholar
Guinnane, T., Harris, R., Lamoreaux, N. and Rosenthal, J-L. ‘Putting the corporation in its place’, Enterprise and Society, 8, 687–729, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, W. B.The Trial of Charles Random de Berenger, Taken in Shorthand, London, 1814.Google Scholar
Habgood, W.Chartered Accountants in England and Wales: A Guide to Historical Records, Manchester, 1994.Google Scholar
Haig, J. C. ‘The case of Thanet, illustrating the methods of Mr H. H. Marks’. In Buxton, C. R., Electioneering Up-to-Date, London, 1906.Google Scholar
Haines, J.Maxwell, London, 1988.Google Scholar
Hall, N. J.Trollope: A Biography, Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar
Hannah, L.The Rise of the Corporate Economy, 2nd edn., London, 1983.Google Scholar
Hannah, L.‘Pioneering modern corporate governance: a view from London in 1900’, Enterprise and Society, 8, 642–86, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H.The Ownership of Enterprise, Cambridge, MA, 1996.Google Scholar
Harling, P.The Waning of ‘Old Corruption’, Oxford, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R.Industrializing English Law: Entrepreneurship and Business Organisation 1720–1844, Cambridge, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R.‘The encounters of economic history and legal history’, Law and History Review, 21, 297–346, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, F.Imprisonment for Breach of Contract, or, the Master and Servant Act, Tracts for Trade unionists, no. 1, London, 1874.Google Scholar
Hart, O. D. ‘Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm’. In O. E. Williamson and S. G. Winter (eds.), The Nature of the Firm, Oxford, 138–58, 1991.Google Scholar
Hay, D. ‘Property, authority and the criminal law’. In D. Hay, P. Linebaugh, J. Rule, E. P. Thompson and C. Winslow (eds.), Albion's Fatal Tree, Harmondsworth, 1977.Google Scholar
Hay, D. ‘Master and servant in England; using the law in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries’. In W. Steinmetz (ed.), Private Law and Social Inequality in the Industrial Age, Oxford, 227–64, 2000.Google Scholar
Hedley, S. ‘The “needs of commercial litigants” in nineteenth and twentieth century contract law’, Legal History, 18, 85–90, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henty, G. A.With Cochrane the Dauntless, London, 1897.Google Scholar
Hess, H.‘The Critic’ Black Book, London, 1901–2.Google Scholar
Hilton, B.The Age of Atonement: The Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought, 1785–1865, Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar
Hilton, M.Consumerism in Twentieth-Century Britain, Cambridge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, F. W.The Stock Exchange, London, 1911.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J.Labouring Men, London, 1964.Google Scholar
Holcombe, L.Wives and Property: Reform of the Married Women's Property Law in Nineteenth-Century England, Toronto, 1983.Google Scholar
Hollander, S.The Economics of David Ricardo, London, 1979.Google Scholar
Honoré, A. ‘Ownership’. In A. G. Guest (ed.), Oxford Essays in JurisprudenceOxford, 107–47, 1961.Google Scholar
Hoppen, K. T.The Mid-Victorian Generation, 1846–1886, Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar
Hoppit, J. ‘The use and abuse of credit in eighteenth-century England’. In R. B. Outhwaite and N. McKendrick (eds.), Business Life and Public Policy, Cambridge, 64–78, 1986.Google Scholar
Hoppit, J.Risk and Failure in English Business, 1700–1800, Cambridge, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, G.A Handy-Book of Labour Laws, London, 1867.Google Scholar
Huberman, M.Escape from the Market, Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
Hudson, P.The Genesis of Industrial Capital: A Study of the West Riding Wool Textile Industry, c. 1750–1850, Cambridge, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, J. ‘“…The most free from objection…”: the sexual division of labour and women's work in nineteenth-century England’, Journal of Economic History, 47, 929–49, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, B. C.The Development of the Business Corporation in England, 1800–1867, Cambridge, MA, 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, E. H.Regional Wage Variation in Britain, 1850–1914, Oxford, 1973.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. H.British Labour History, 1815–1914, London, 1981.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. H.‘Industrialization and regional inequality: wages in Britain, 1760–1914’, Journal of Economic History, 46, 935–66, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, J. ‘Prisons for the poor: English Bridewells 1555–1800’. In F. Snyder and D. Hay (eds.), Labour, Law and Crime: An Historical Perspective, London, 42–122, 1987.Google Scholar
Innes, J.Insurance Mail Yearbook, London, 1908.Google Scholar
Ireland, P. ‘The rise of the limited liability company’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 12, 239–60, 1984.Google Scholar
Ireland, P.‘Capitalism without the capitalist: the joint stock company share and the emergence of the modern doctrine of separate corporate personality’, Journal of Legal History, 17, 41–73, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itzkowitz, D. C. ‘Fair enterprise or extravagant speculation: investment, speculation and gambling in Victorian England’, Victorian Studies, 45, 121–47, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R. V. ‘The structure of pay in nineteenth-century Britain’, Economic History Review, 40, 561–70, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaycee, Public Companies: From the Cradle to the Grave, London, 1883.Google Scholar
Jefferys, J. B. ‘Trends in Business Organisation in Great Britain since 1856’, PhD thesis, University of London, 1938.
Jefferys, J. B.‘The denomination and character of shares, 1855–1885’, Economic History Review, 16, 45–55, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. ‘Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–60, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P.Saving and Spending: The Working-Class Economy in Britain 1870–1939, Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
Johnson, P.‘Class law in Victorian England’, Past and Present, 141, 147–69, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P.‘Small debts and economic distress in England and Wales, 1857–1913’, Economic History Review, 46, 65–87, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. ‘Age, gender and the wage in Britain, 1830–1930’. In P. Scholliers and L. Schwartz (eds.), Experiencing Wages, Oxford, 229–49, 2003.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. ‘Market discipline’. In P. Mandler (ed.), Liberty and Authority in Victorian England, Oxford, 203–23, 2006.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. and Zaidi, A. ‘Work over the life course’. In N. F. R. Crafts, I. Gazeley and A. Newell (eds.), Work and Pay in Twentieth-Century Britain, Oxford, 98–116, 2007.Google Scholar
Jones, E.Accountancy and the British Economy 1840–1980: The Evolution of Ernst and Whinney, London, 1981.Google Scholar
Jones, S. and Aiken, M. ‘British companies legislation and social and political evolution during the nineteenth century’ British Accounting Review, 27, 61–82, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, E. ‘The lady clerks at the Prudential: the beginning of vertical segretation by sex in clerical work in nineteenth-century Britain’, Gender and History, 8, 65–81, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, D.Palmerston, London, 1975.Google Scholar
Katz, L. F. and Autor, D. H. ‘Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality’. In O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3A, Amsterdam, 1463–555, 1999.Google Scholar
Kay, J. ‘The Stakeholder Corporation’. In Kelly, G., Kelly, D. and Gamble, A. (eds.), Stakeholder Capitalism, Basingstoke, 125–141, 1997.
Kelman, M.A Guide to Critical Legal Studies, Cambridge, MA, 1990.Google Scholar
Kent, D. A. ‘Small businessmen and their credit transactions in early nineteenth-century Britain’, Business History, 36, 47–64, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, N.Labour and Society in Britain and America, Aldershot, 1994.Google Scholar
Kostal, R. W.Law and English Railway Capitalism, 1825–1875, Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
Koten, D. C.The Post-Corporate World, West Hartford, CT, 1998.Google Scholar
Krippner, G. R. ‘The elusive market: embeddedness and the paradigm of economic sociology’, Theory and Society, 30, 775–810, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R. ‘Legal determinants of external finance’, Journal of Finance, 52, 1131–50, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R.‘Law and finance’, Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1133–55, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoreaux, N. R. ‘Constructing firms: partnerships and alternative contractual arrangements in early nineteenth century American business’, Business and Economic History, 24, 43–71, 1995.Google Scholar
Lavington, F.The English Capital Market, London, 1929.Google Scholar
Law, E. D.The Guilt of Lord Cochrane, London, 1914.Google Scholar
Law, H. S.Reviews of the ‘Autobiography of a Seaman’, London, 1877.Google Scholar
Lester, V. M.Victorian Insolvency, Oxford, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, W. B.Bribery, London, 1919.Google Scholar
Leventhal, F. M.Respectable Radical: George Howell and Victorian Working Class Politics, London, 1971.Google Scholar
Levi, L. ‘On the abolition of imprisonment for debt’, Law Magazine and Review, 3, 1847.Google Scholar
Levi, L.‘On joint stock companies’, Journal of the Statistical Society, 33, 1–41, 1870.Google Scholar
Levi, L.‘The progress of joint stock companies with limited and unlimited liability in the United Kingdom, during the fifteen years 1869–84’, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 49, 241–72, 1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, D. ‘Contract before “freedom of contract”’. In H. N. Scheiber (ed.), The State and Freedom of Contract, Stanford, 1998.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, S. and Margolis, S. ‘The fable of the keys’, Journal of Law and Economics, 33, 1–25, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebowitz, S. and Margolis, S.‘Path dependence, lock-in, and history’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 205–26, 1995.Google Scholar
Lindley, N.A Treatise on the Law of Companies Considered as a Branch of the Law of Partnership, London, 1891.Google Scholar
Lloyd, C.Lord Cochrane, London, 1947.Google Scholar
Lobban, M.The Common Law and English Jurisprudence, 1760–1850, Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar
Loftus, D. ‘Capital and community: limited liability and attempts to democratize the market in mid nineteenth-century England’, Victorian Studies, 45, 93–120, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longe, F. D.A Refutation of the Wages Fund Theory of Modern Political Economy, as Enunciated by Mr Mill and Mr Fawcett, London, 1866.Google Scholar
Lowe, R.Speech on the Amendment of the Law of Partnership and Joint Stock Companies, London, 1856.Google Scholar
Lown, J.Women and Industrialization: Gender at Work in Nineteenth-Century England, Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
MacDonagh, O. ‘The Nineteenth Century Revolution in Government: A Reappraisal’, Historical Journal, 1, 52–67, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. ‘Path dependence in historical sociology’, Theory and Society, 29, 507–48, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maine, Sir H.Ancient Law, London, 1861.Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W.State, Trust and Corporation, D. Runciman and M. Ryan (eds.), Cambridge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, A. H.A Modern Legal History of England and Wales, London, 1980.Google Scholar
Mann, J. de L.The Cloth Industry in the West of England from 1640 to 1880, Oxford, 1971.Google Scholar
Marcet, J.Conversation on Political Economy in which Elements of that Science are Familiarly Explained, London, 1816.Google Scholar
Marks, H.The Metropolitan Board of Works: A Brief Account of the Disclosures which Have Led to the Appointment of a Royal Commission, London, 1888.Google Scholar
Marshall, A.Principles of Economics, London, 1890.Google Scholar
Marshall, A.Industry and Trade: a Study of Industrial Technique and Business Organization, London, 1919.Google Scholar
Martin, R. M.TUC: The Growth of a Pressure Group, 1868–1976, Oxford, 1980.Google Scholar
Martineau, H. ‘The Manchester Strike’, Illustrations of Political Economy, London, 1832.Google Scholar
Matthew, H. C. G.Gladstone 1809–1874, Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R.Considerations on Partnership with Limited Liability, London, 1856.Google Scholar
McIvor, A. J.Organised Capital: Employers' Associations and Industrial Relations in Northern England, 1880–1939, Cambridge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIvor, A. J.Men and Women of the Time, London, 1899.Google Scholar
Michie, R.The London Stock Exchange: A History, Oxford, 1999 and 2001.Google Scholar
Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A.The Company, London, 2003.Google Scholar
Mill, J.Elements of Political Economy, London, 1821.
Mill, J. S.Principles of Political Economy, London, 1848.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S.‘Thornton on Labour and its claims’, Fortnightly Review, May, 517–8, 1869.Google Scholar
Mincer, J.Schooling, Experience and Earnings, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L.Corporate Irresponsibility: America's Newest Export, New Haven, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, E. V. and Thomas, W. A.The Stock Exchange: Its History and Functions, London, 1962.Google Scholar
Morris, R. J.Class, Sect and Party: The Making of the British Middle Class, Leeds 1820–1850, London, 1990.Google Scholar
Muldrew, C.The Economy of Obligation: The Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England, Basingstoke, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, R.Anthony Trollope: A Victorian and His World, London, 1990.
Napier, C. and Noke, C. ‘Accounting and law; an historical overview of an uneasy relationship’. In M. Bromwich and A. Hopwood (eds.), Accounting and the Law, Hemel Hempstead, 30–54, 1992.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA, 1982.Google Scholar
North, D. ‘Institutions and Economic Performance’. In Maki, U., Gustafsson, B. and Knudson, C. (eds.), Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology, London, 242–61, 1993.
O'Brian, P.The Reverse of the Medal, London, 1986.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P.The Classical Economists, Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. ‘Special juries in England: nineteenth-century usage and reform’. Journal of Legal History, 8, 148–66, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orth, J. V.Combination and Conspiracy: A Legal History of Trade Unionism 1721–1906, Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar
Orth, J. V.Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford, 2004.Google Scholar
Parris, H. ‘The nineteenth century revolution in government: a reappraisal reappraised’, Historical Journal, 3, 17–37, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, R. ‘Mutuality tested: the rise and fall of mutual fire insurance offices in eighteenth-century London’, Business History, 44, 1–28, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, R.‘Shareholder democracies? English stock companies and the politics of corporate governance during the Industrial Revolution’, English Historical Review, cxvii, 840–66, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps Brown, E. H. and Hopkins, S. V. ‘Seven centuries of building wages’, Economica, 22, 195–206, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps Brown, E. H. ‘The labour market’. In Wilson, T. and Skinner, A. S., The Market and the State, Oxford, 1976.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. ‘Black Country Magistracy 1835–60’, Midland History, 3, 161–90, 1975–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, G. and Whiteside, N.Casual Labour: The Unemployment Question in the Port Transport Industry 1880–1970, Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. ‘Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics’, American Political Science Review, 94, 251–67, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P.‘Not just what, but when: timing and sequence in political processes’, Studies in American Political Development, 14, 72–92, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polden, P. ‘Judicial Selkirks: the county court judges and the press, 1847–80’. In Brooks, C. W. and Lobban, M. (eds.), Communities and Courts in Britain 1150–1900, London, 245–62, 1997.Google Scholar
Polden, P.A History of the County Court 1846–1971, Cambridge, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, F.Principles of Contract at Law and in Equity, London, 1876.Google Scholar
Poovey, M. ‘Writing about finance in Victorian England: disclosure and secrecy in the culture of investment’, Victorian Studies, 45, 17–41, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, M.The Financial System in Nineteenth-Century Britain, Oxford, 2003.Google Scholar
Porter, D. ‘“A trusted guide of the investing public”: Harry Marks and the Financial News, 1884–1916’. In Davenport-Hines, R. P. T. (ed.), Speculators and Patriots: Essays in Business Biography, London, 1986.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A.Economic Analysis of Law, Boston, 1972.Google Scholar
Potter, A. ‘Attitude groups’, Political Quarterly, 29, 72–82, 1958.Google Scholar
Pottier, S. and Sommer, D. W. ‘Agency theory and life insurer ownership structure’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 64, 529–43, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puffert, D. ‘The standardization of track gauge on North American railways, 1830–1890’, Journal of Economic History, 60, 933–60, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. ‘Work, culture and resistance to machinery in the West of England woollen industry’. In P. Hudson (ed.), Regions and Industries, Cambridge, 175–200, 1989.Google Scholar
Reddy, W. M.The Rise of Market Culture: the Textile Trade and French Society, 1750–1900, Cambridge, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redford, A.Manchester Merchants and Foreign Trade: 1794–1858, Manchester, 1934.Google Scholar
Reid, A. J. ‘Old unionism reconsidered: the radicalism of Robert Knight, 1870–1900’. In E. F. Biagini and A. J. Reid (eds.), Currents of Radicalism: Popular Radicalism, Organised Labour and Party Politics in Britain, 1850–1914, Cambridge, 214–43, 1991.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D.On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London, 1817.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. J.‘Exposure of the banking and funding system’, The English Chartist Circular: The Temperance Record for England and Wales 1.23 (1841), 90–1.Google Scholar
Ridley, J.The Young Disraeli, London, 1995.Google Scholar
Robb, G.White-Collar Crime in Modern England: Financial Fraud and Business Morality, 1845–1929, Cambridge, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, M.Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance, Princeton, 1994.Google Scholar
Rose, S.Limited Livelihoods: Gender and Class in Nineteenth-Century England, Berkeley, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, S. ‘The theory of equalizing differences’. In O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 1, Amsterdam, 641–92, 1987.Google Scholar
,Royal British Bank. Prospectus, Goldsmiths' Library, London, 1849.Google Scholar
Rubin, G. R. ‘The county courts and the tally trade, 1846–1914’. In G. Rubin and D. Sugarman (eds.), Law, Economy and Society, 1750–1914, Abingdon, 321–48, 1984.Google Scholar
Rubin, G. R. ‘Law, Poverty and Imprisonment for Debt, 1869–1914’. In G. R. Rubin and D. Sugarman (eds.), Law, Economy and Society, 1750–1914, Abingdon, 241–99, 1984.Google Scholar
Russell, N.The Novelist and Mammon, Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. ‘Predatory practices or reasonable values? American Institutionalists on the nature of market transactions’. In N. De Marchi and M. Morgan (eds.), Higgling: Transactors and their Markets in the History of Economics. Annual Supplement to vol. 26 of History of Political Economy (Durham, NC, 1994), 253–75, 1994.
Samuel, H. B.Shareholders' Money, London, 1933.Google Scholar
Saul, S. B.The Myth of the Great Depression, 1873–96, London, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saville, J. ‘Sleeping partnerships and limited liability, 1850–1856’, Economic History Review, 8, 418–33, 1956.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R.The Constitution and Finance of English, Scottish and Irish Joint-Stock Companies to 1720, Cambridge University Press, 1910–12.Google Scholar
Sealy, L. S.Company Law and Commercial Reality, London, 1984.Google Scholar
Searle, G. R.Morality and the Market in Victorian Britain, Oxford, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, N.An Outline of the Science of Political Economy, London, 1836.Google Scholar
Shannon, H. A. ‘The coming of general limited liability’, Economic History, 2, 267–91, 1931, reprinted in Carus-Wilson, E. M. (ed.), Essays in Economic History, London, 1954, 358–79.
Shannon, H. A.‘The first five thousand limited companies and their duration’, Economic History, 2, 396–424, 1932.Google Scholar
Shannon, H. A.‘The limited companies of 1866–83’, Economic History Review, 4, 290–316, 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, H. A.‘Review of H. B. Samuel, “Shareholders’ Money”', Economica, November, 507–9, 1933.Google Scholar
Shannon, R.The Age of Disraeli, 1868–1881: The Rise of Tory Democracy, London, 1992.Google Scholar
Sharpe, P. ‘Continuity and change: women's history and economic history in Britain’, Economic History Review, 48, 353–69, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C. ‘The large manufacturing employers of 1907’, Business History, 25, 42–59, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrake, J.Municipal Socialism, Aldershot, 1989.Google Scholar
Simon, D. ‘Master and Servant’. In J. Saville (ed.), Democracy and the Labour Movement Essays in honour of Dona Torr, London, 160–200, 1954.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B.A History of the Common Law of Contract, Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B.Leading Cases in the Common Law, Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar
Smith, A.An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. In R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner (eds.), Oxford, 1976 [1776].Google Scholar
Smith, H. ‘The resurgent County Court in Victorian Britain’, American Journal of Legal History, 13, 126–38, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snagge, Sir T.The Evolution of the County Court, London, 14, 1904.Google Scholar
Snyder, F. and Hay, D. (eds.), Labour, Law and Crime, London, 1987.Google Scholar
Southall, H. ‘The origins of the depressed areas: unemployment, growth, and regional economic structure in Britain before 1914’, Economic History Review, 41, 236–58, 1988.Google Scholar
Southall, H. and Gilbert, D. ‘A good time to wed?: marriage and economic distress in England and Wales, 1839–1914’, Economic History Review, 49, 35–57, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spain, J. ‘Trade unionists, Gladstonian Liberals and the labour law reforms of 1875’. In E. F. Biagiani and A. J. Reid (eds.), Currents of Radicalism, Cambridge, 109–33, 1991.Google Scholar
Spencer, H.The Man versus The State, Indianopolis, 1981 [1884].Google Scholar
Spensley, C.Twelve Hundred Facts about ‘Ordinary’ Life Assurance Offices, Bradford, 1901.Google Scholar
Statist, , All About Assurance, London, 1904.Google Scholar
Steinfeld, R.Coercion, Contract, and Free Labor in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmetz, W. ‘Was there a de-juridification of individual employment relations in Britain?’ In W. Steinmetz (ed.), Private Law and Social Inequality in the Industrial Age, Oxford, 265–312, 2000.Google Scholar
Stenton, M.Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, vol. 1: 1832–1885, Hassocks, 1976.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. ‘Social structure and the founding of organizations’. In his Stratification and Organisation, Cambridge, 196–220, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exchange, Stock, Report of the Sub-Committee of the Stock Exchange Relative to the Late Fraud, London, 1814.Google Scholar
Storrar, A. C. and Pratt, K. C. ‘Accountability vs privacy, 1844–1907: the coming of the private company’, Accounting, Business and Financial History 10, 259–91, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugarman, D. and Rubin, G. R. ‘Towards a new history of law and material society in England, 1750–1914’. In G. R. Rubin and D. Sugarman (eds.), Law, Economy and society, 1750–1914: Essays in the History of English Law, Abingdon, 1–123, 1984.Google Scholar
Sugarman, D. ‘A hatred of disorder: legal science, liberalism and imperialism’. In P. Fitzpatrick (ed.), Dangerous Supplements: Resistance and Renewal in Jurisprudence, London, 34–67, 1991.Google Scholar
Sugarman, D.‘Simple images and complex realities: English lawyers and their relationship to business and politics, 1750–1950’, Law and History Review, 11, 257–301, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugarman, D. ‘Who colonised whom? Historical reflections on the intersection between law, lawyers and accountants in England’. In Y. Dezalay and D. Sugarman (eds.), Professional Competition and Professional Power: Lawyers, Accountants and the Social Construction of Markets, London, 226–37, 1995.Google Scholar
Supple, B.The Royal Exchange Assurance: A History of British Insurance 1720–1970, Cambridge, 1970.Google Scholar
Swiney, W.A Letter to the Rt. Hon. Benjamin D'Israeli Respecting Certain Life Assurance Companies, London, 1852.Google Scholar
Taussig, F. W.Wages and Capital: An Examination of the Wages Fund Doctrine, London, 1896.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. ‘Private property, public interest, and the role of the state in nineteenth-century Britain: the case of the lighthouses’, Historical Journal, 44, 749–71, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. ‘“Wealth makes worship”: attitudes to joint stock enterprise in British law, politics and culture, c. 1800–c. 1870’, University of Kent PhD thesis, 2002.
Taylor, J.Creating Capitalism: Joint-Stock Enterprise in British Politics and Culture, 1800–1870, Woodbridge, 2006.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.‘Company fraud in Victorian Britain: the Royal British Bank scandal of 1856’. English Historical Review, 122, 700–24, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terloc, T. L.Life Assurance: As It Is, and As It Should Be, Birmingham, 1887.Google Scholar
Thackeray, ‘The history of Samuel Titmarsh and the Great Hoggarty Diamond’, Fraser's Magazine, September–December, 1841.Google Scholar
Thackeray, The Joint-Stock Companies Directory, 1866, London, 1866.
Thomas, , 10th Earl of Dundonald, Autobiography of a Seaman, London, 1860.Google Scholar
Thomas, , 11th earl of Dundonald and Bourne, H. R. Fox, Life of Thomas, 10th Earl of Dundonald, Completing the Autobiography of a Seaman, 2 vols., London, 1869.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. ‘Time, work-discipline and industrial capitalism’, Past and Present, 38, 56–97, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E. P.Whigs and Hunters, London, 1975.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. ‘The moral economy reviewed’. In his Customs in Common, London, 259–351, 1993.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. and Delano, A.Maxwell: A Portrait of Power, London, 1991.Google Scholar
Thornton, W.On Labour: Its Wrongful Claims and Rightful Dues, Its Actual Present and Possible Future, London, 1869.Google Scholar
Todd, G. ‘Some aspects of joint stock companies, 1844–1900’, Economic History Review, 4, 46–71, 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trainor, R. H.Black Country Elites: The Exercise of Authority in an Industrial Area, 1830–1900, Oxford, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, C.Phoenix Assurance and the Development of British Insurance, vol. 1: 1782–1870, Cambridge, 1985.Google Scholar
Treble, J. H. ‘The record of the Standard Life Assurance Company in the life assurance market of the United Kingdom, 1850–64’. In O. M. Westall (ed.), The Historian and the Business of Insurance, Manchester, 1984.Google Scholar
Tressell, R.The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, London, 1965 [1914].Google Scholar
Trollope, A.The Way We Live Now, London, 1994 [1875].Google Scholar
Turkel, G. ‘Michel Foucault: Law, power, knowledge’, Journal of Law and Society, 17, 170–93, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenze, D.The First Industrial Woman, Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar
Helton, J. J. ‘Mining, share manias and speculation: British investment in overseas mining, 1880–1913’. In J. J. van Helton and Y. Cassis (eds.), Capitalism in a Mature Economy, Aldershot, 159–85, 1990.Google Scholar
Verdon, N.Rural Women Workers in Nineteenth-Century England: Gender, Work and Wages, Woodbridge, 2002.Google Scholar
Vint, J.Capital and Wages: A Lakatosian History of the Wages Fund Doctrine, Aldershot, 1994.Google Scholar
Walker, J. D. and Watson. Investors' and Shareholders' Guide, Edinburgh, 1894.Google Scholar
Walker, S. P. ‘Laissez-faire, collectivism and companies legislation in nineteenth century Britain’, British Accounting Review, 28, 305–24, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. and B. History of Trade Unionism, London, 1898.Google Scholar
Weintraub, S.Disraeli: A Biography, London, 1993.Google Scholar
Weiss, B.The Hell of the English, Lewisburg, 1986.Google Scholar
Wermel, M. T.The Evolution of Classical Wage Theory, New York, 1939.Google Scholar
Whately, R.Introductory Lectures on Political Economy, London, 1832.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G. ‘The structure of pay in Britain, 1710–1911’, Research in Economic History, 7, 1982.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G.Did British Capitalism Breed Inequality?, London, 1985.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, London, 1987.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. J.Plain Advice About Life Insurance, London, 1898.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. F.British Business History, 1720–1994, Manchester, 1995.Google Scholar
Winch, D.Adam Smith's Politics, Cambridge, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohl, A. S.Endangered Lives, London, 1983.Google Scholar
Woods, D. C. ‘The operation of the Master and Servant Acts in the Black Country, 1858–1875’, Midland History, 7, 93–115, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, D. ‘The determination of wage rates in the early modern north of England’, Economic History Review, 47, 22–43, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, T.Our New Masters, London, 1873.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Paul Johnson, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: Making the Market
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750533.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Paul Johnson, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: Making the Market
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750533.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Paul Johnson, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: Making the Market
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750533.012
Available formats
×