We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter provides an overview of pedagogical heritage language (HL) assessment issues and an agenda for enhancing positive washback effects of assessment on HL learners in the future. After an introduction, the chapter first discusses the definition of HL learners used here and elsewhere. Second, it explores two distinct types of tests that are important and relevant to the subsequent discussions of HL assessment issues. The discussions reveal an apparent lack of validation studies for proficiency assessment tools in general and HL assessment in particular. For example, postsecondary placement investigations dealing with HL learners largely focus on Spanish but little is known for placement practices in other HLs. Also, the availability of assessment tools for pre-collegiate HL programs is very limited, especially for less commonly taught languages. Validation studies of existing assessment procedures for pre-collegiate HL programs are scarce. This chapter also points out that bilinguals’ dynamic and holistic use of linguistic repertoires adds complexity to assessing bilinguals’ HL proficiency. This chapter mainly discusses HL assessment in pedagogical contexts, but where relevant, it examines the use of HL tests for research as well.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.