Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:08:28.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

35 - Heritage Language Assessment

from Part IV - Heritage Language Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2021

By
Kimi Kondo-Brown
Edited by
Silvina Montrul  and
Maria Polinsky
Silvina Montrul
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Maria Polinsky
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides an overview of pedagogical heritage language (HL) assessment issues and an agenda for enhancing positive washback effects of assessment on HL learners in the future. After an introduction, the chapter first discusses the definition of HL learners used here and elsewhere. Second, it explores two distinct types of tests that are important and relevant to the subsequent discussions of HL assessment issues. The discussions reveal an apparent lack of validation studies for proficiency assessment tools in general and HL assessment in particular. For example, postsecondary placement investigations dealing with HL learners largely focus on Spanish but little is known for placement practices in other HLs. Also, the availability of assessment tools for pre-collegiate HL programs is very limited, especially for less commonly taught languages. Validation studies of existing assessment procedures for pre-collegiate HL programs are scarce. This chapter also points out that bilinguals’ dynamic and holistic use of linguistic repertoires adds complexity to assessing bilinguals’ HL proficiency. This chapter mainly discusses HL assessment in pedagogical contexts, but where relevant, it examines the use of HL tests for research as well.

Keywords

assessmenttestingnorm-referenced (proficiency) testcriterion-referenced (achievement) testplacement testACTFL OPImultilingual assessmentwashback effect
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics , pp. 892 - 911
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Councils for International Education. 2017. The National K-16 Foreign Language Enrollment Survey Report. Retrieved from www.americancouncils.org/sites/default/files/FLE-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Arter, J. and McTighe, J.. 2001. Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. S.. 1996. Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. and Savignon, S. J.. 1986. The Evaluation of Communicative Language Proficiency: A Critique of the ACTFL Oral Interview. The Modern Language Journal 70(4), 380–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, K. M. 1998. Learning about Language Assessment: Dilemmas, Decisions, and Directions. Cambridge, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Baker, C. and Wright, W. E.. 2017. Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (6th ed.) Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Beaudrie, S. M. 2012. Introduction: Developments in Spanish Heritage Language Assessment. Heritage Language Journal 9(1), i–xi.Google Scholar
Beaudrie, S. and Ducar, C.. 2012. Language Placement and beyond: Guidelines for the Design and Implementation of a Computerized Spanish Heritage Language Exam. Heritage Language Journal 9(1), 77–99.Google Scholar
Breen, M. P. 1997. The Relationship between Assessment Frameworks and Classroom Pedagogy. In Breen, M. P., Barratt-Pugh, C., Derewianka, B., House, H., Hudson, C., Lumley, T., and Rohl, M. (eds.), Profiling ESL Children: How Teachers Interpret and Use National and State Assessment Frameworks, Vol. 1. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, 91–128.Google Scholar
Brown, A. V. and Thompson, G. L.. 2016. The Evolution of Foreign Language AP Exam Candidates: A 36-year Descriptive Study. Foreign Language Annals 49(2), 235–251.Google Scholar
Brown, D. 2018. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices (3rd ed.) White Plains, NY: Pearson Education ESL.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. 2005. Testing in Language Program: A Comprehensive Guide to English Language Assessment (revised ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (ed.) 2012. Developing, Using, and Analyzing Rubrics in Language Assessment with Case Studies in Asian-Pacific Languages. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Languages Resource Center Publications.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. and Hudson, T.. 2002. Criterion-Referenced Language Testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D., Hudson, T., and Clark, M.. 2004. Issues in Placement Survey. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai‘i. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW40/SurveyResults.htmlGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y. G. 2016. Assessing Young Learners. In Tsagari, D. and Banerjee, J. (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Assessment. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 359–376.Google Scholar
Caballero, A. M. S. 2014. Preparing Teachers to Work with Heritage Language Learners. In Wiley, T. G., Peyton, J. K., Christian, D., Moore, S. C., and Liu, N. (eds.), Handbook of Heritage, Community, and Native American Languages in the United States. New York: Routledge, 359–369.Google Scholar
Carreira, M. M. 2012. Formative Assessment in HL Teaching: Purposes, Procedures, and Practices. Heritage Language Journal 9(1), 100–120.Google Scholar
Chalhoub-Deville, M. snd Fulcher, G.. 2003. The Oral Proficiency Interview and the ACTFL Guidelines: A Research Agenda. Foreign Language Annals 36(4), 498–506.Google Scholar
Domingo, N. P. 2008.Towards a Heritage-Learner-Sensitive Filipino Placement Test at UCLA. In Hudson, T. and Clark, M. (eds.), Case Studies in Foreign Language Placement: Practices and Possibilities. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center, 17–28.Google Scholar
Fairclough, M. 2011. Testing the Lexical Recognition Task with Spanish/English Bilinguals in the United States. Language Testing 28(2), 273–297.Google Scholar
Fairclough, M. 2012. A Working Model for Assessing Spanish Heritage Language Learners’ Language Proficiency through a Placement Exam. Heritage Language Journal 9(1), 121–138.Google Scholar
Fairclough, M., Belpoliti, F., and Bermejo, E.. 2010. Developing an Electronic Placement Examination for Heritage Learners of Spanish: Challenges and Payoffs. Hispania 93(2), 273–291.Google Scholar
Fee, M., Rhodes, N. C., and Wiley, T. G.. 2014. Demographic Realities, Challenges, and Opportunities. In Wiley, T., Peyton, J. K., Christian, C., Moore, S., and Liu, N. (eds.), Handbook of Heritage, Community, and Native American Languages in the United States: Research, Educational Practice, and Policy. New York: Routledge, 6–18.Google Scholar
Fulcher, G. 1996. Invalidating Validity Claims for the ACTFL Oral Rating Scale. System 24(2), 163–172.Google Scholar
Garcia, O. and Wei, L.. 2014. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gatti, A. and O’Neill, T.. 2018. Writing Proficiency Profiles of Heritage Learners of Chinese, Korean, and Spanish. Foreign Language Annals 51(4), 719–737.Google Scholar
Green, A. 2014. Exploring Language Assessment and Testing: Language in Action. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. 1985. The Bilingual as a Competent but Specific Speaker-Hearer. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 6(6), 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman-Orth, D., Lopez, A. A., and Tolentino, F.. 2017. A Framework for the Dual Language Assessment of Young Dual Language Learners in the United States (Research Report No. RR-17-37). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, T. 2008. Measuring the Japanese Proficiency of Heritage Language Children. In Kondo-Brown, K. and Brown, J. D. (eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean Heritage Language Students: Curriculum Needs, Materials, and Assessment. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 77–98.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H. and Wang, S. C.. 2008. Who Are Our Heritage Language Learners? Identity and Biliteracy in Heritage Language Education in the United States. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., and Bauckus, S. (eds.), Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging. New York: Routledge, 3–35.Google Scholar
Howard, E. R., Sugarman, J., Christian, D., Lindholm-Leary, K. J., and Rogers, D.. 2007. Guiding Principles for Dual Language Education (2nd ed.) Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from www.cal.org/ndlf/pdfs/guiding-principles-for-dual-language-education.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hughes, A. 2003. Testing for Language Teachers (2nd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ilieva, G. N. 2012. Hindi Heritage Language Learners’ Performance during OPIs: Characteristics and Pedagogical Implications. Heritage Language Journal 9(2), 18–36.Google Scholar
Ilieva, G. N. and Clark-Gareca, B.. 2016. Heritage Language Learner Assessment: Toward Proficiency Standards. In Fairclough, M. and Beaudrie, S. M. (eds.), Innovative Strategies for Heritage Language Teaching: A Practical Guide for the Classroom. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 214–236.Google Scholar
Kagan, O. and Friedman, D.. 2003. Using the OPI to Place Heritage Speakers of Russian. Foreign Language Annals 36(4), 536–545.Google Scholar
Kanno, K., Hasegawa, T., Ikeda, K., Ito, Y., and Long, M. H.. 2008. Prior Language-Learning Experience and Variation in the Linguistic Profiles of Advanced English-Speaking Learners of Japanese. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., and Bauckus, S. (eds.), Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging. New York: Routledge, 215–228.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. 2002. A FACETS Analysis of Rater Bias in Measuring Japanese Second Language Writing Performance. Language Testing 19(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. 2004. Do Background Variables Predict Students’ Scores on a Japanese Placement Test? Implications for Placing Heritage Language Learners. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. 2005. Differences in Language Skills: Heritage Language Learner Subgroups and Foreign Language Learners. The Modern Language Journal 89(4), 563–581.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. (ed.) 2006. Heritage Language Development: Focus on East Asian Immigrants. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. 2010. Curriculum Development for Advancing Heritage Language Competence: Recent Research, Innovations, and a Future Agenda. The Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30, 24–-41.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. 2009. Dynamic Assessment: The Dialectical Integration of Instruction and Assessment. Language Teaching 42(3), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. and Frawley, W.. 1985. Oral-Proficiency Testing: A Critical Analysis. The Modern Language Journal 69, 337–345.Google Scholar
Llosa, L. 2013. Assessing Heritage Language Learners. In Kunnan, A. J. (ed.), The Companion to Language Assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla121Google Scholar
Looney, D. and Lusin, N.. 2018. Enrollments in Languages other than English in United States Institutions of Higher Education, Summer 2016 and Fall 2016. Retrieved from www.mla.org/content/download/83540/2197676/2016-Enrollments-Short-Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
MacGregor-Mendoza, P. 2012. Spanish as a Heritage Language Assessment: Successes, Failures, Lessons Learned. Heritage Language Journal 8(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, M. E. 2003. Research on the Oral Proficiency Interview: Analysis, Synthesis, and Future Directions. Foreign Language Annals 36(4), 491–497.Google Scholar
Malone, M., Peyton, J. K., and Kim, K.. 2014. Assessment of Heritage Language Learners: Issues and Directions. In Wiley, T. G., Peyton, J. K., Christian, D., Moore, S. C., and Liu, N. (Eds.), Handbook of Heritage, Community, and Rative American Languages in the United States. New York: Routledge, 349–358.Google Scholar
Martin, C., Swender, E., and Rivera-Martinez, M.. 2013. Assessing the Oral Proficiency of Heritage Speakers According to the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012-Speaking. Heritage Language Journal 10(2), 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, P. 2006. Assessing Young Language Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. F. and Roever, C.. 2006. Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Perpiñán, S.. 2011. Assessing Differences and Similarities between Instructed Heritage Language Learners and L2 Learners in Their Knowledge of Spanish Tense-Aspect and Mood (TAM) Morphology. Heritage Language Journal 8(1), 90–133.Google Scholar
Moore, S. C. 2014. Program Models for Heritage Language Education. In Wiley, T. G., Peyton, J. K., Christian, D., Moore, S. C., and Liu, N. (eds.), Handbook of Heritage, Community, and Native American Languages in the United States. New York: Routledge, 341–348.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. and Evans-Romaine, K. (eds.) 2016. Exploring the US Language Flagship Program: Professional Competence in a Second Language by Graduation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. 2006. The Why (and How) of Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in College Foreign Language Programs. The Modern Language Journal 90(4), 576–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2008. Heritage Language Narratives. In Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., and Bauckus, S. (eds.), Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging. New York: Routledge, 149–164.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popham, W. J. 2008. Transformative Assessment. Alexandra, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Potowski, K., Parada, M. A., and Morgan-Short, K.. 2012. Developing an Online Placement Exam for Spanish Heritage Speakers and L2 Students. Heritage Language Journal 9(1), 51–76.Google Scholar
Ranjan, R. 2008. The Challenge of Placing Hindi Heritage Students. In Hudson, T. and Clark, M. (eds.), Case Studies in Foreign Language Placement: Practices and Possibilities. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center, 177–186.Google Scholar
Rea-Dickins, P. 2001. Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Identifying Processes of Classroom Assessment. Language Testing 18(4), 429–462.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. and Schmidt, R.. 2010. Longman Dictionary of language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th ed.) London: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Salaberry, R. 2000. Revising the Revised Format of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview. Language Testing 17(3), 289–310.Google Scholar
Sato, G. and Kataoka, H. (eds.) 2008. Amerika de sodatsu nihon no kodomotachi [Japanese Children Growing Up in America]. Tokyo: Akashi.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. 2011. Assessing Multilingual Competencies: Adopting Construct Valid Assessment Policies. The Modern Language Journal 95(3), 418–429.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. and Menken, K.. 2015. Language Assessment: Past to Present Misuses and Future Possibilities. In Wright, W. E., Boun, S., and García, O. (eds.), The Handbook of Bilingual and Multilingual Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118533406.ch15Google Scholar
Sohn, S-O. and Shin, S-K.. 2007. True Beginners, False Beginners, and Fake Beginners: Placement Strategies for Korean Heritage Speakers. Foreign Language Annals 40(3), 407–418.Google Scholar
Son, Yung-A. 2017. Toward Useful Assessment and Evaluation of Heritage Language Learning. Foreign Language Annals 50(2), 367–386.Google Scholar
Stevens, D. and Levi, A. J.. 2005. Introduction to Rubrics: An Assessment Tool to Save Grading Time, Convey Effective Feedback, and Promote Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
Swender, E., Martin, C., Rivera-Martinez, M., and Kagan, O.. 2014. Exploring Oral Proficiency Profiles of Heritage Speakers of Russian and Spanish. Foreign Language Annals 47(3), 423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Center for Applied Linguistics. 2007. Spanish-Language Assessments for Dual Language Programs. Retrieved from www.cal.org/twi/pdfs/assessments.pdfGoogle Scholar
The Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). 2016. Kaigai de manabu nihon no kodomotachi [Japanese school-age children studying abroad]. Retrieved from www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/clarinet/002/001.htmGoogle Scholar
The UCLA Steering Committee. 2000. Heritage Language Research Priorities Conference Report. Bilingual Research Journal 24, 333–346.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. L., Cox, T. L., and Knapp, N.. 2016. Comparing the OPI and OPIc: The Effect of Test Method on Oral Proficiency Scores and Student Preference. Foreign Language Annals 49(1), 75–92.Google Scholar
Tominaga, W. 2013. The Development of Extended Turns and Storytelling in the Japanese Oral Proficiency Interview. In Ross, S. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Assessing Second Language Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 220–257.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, C. A. and Moon, T. R.. 2013. Assessment and Student Success in a Differentiated Classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. 1989. Teaching Spanish to Hispanic Bilinguals: A Look at Oral Proficiency Testing the Proficiency Movement. Hispania 72, 392–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, G. 2001. Heritage Language Students: Profiles and Possibilities. In Peyton, J. K., Ranard, D. A., and McGinnis, S. (eds.), Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource. McHenry, IL: The Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems, 37–77.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. 2005. Bilingualism, Heritage Language Learners, and SLA Research: Opportunities Lost or Seized? The Modern Language Journal 89(3), 410–426.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. and Figueroa, R.. 1994. Bilingualism and Testing: A Special Case of Bias. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. V. 2012. Developing a Placement Exam for Spanish Heritage Language Learners: Item Analysis and Learner Characteristics. Heritage Language Journal 9(1), 27–50.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×