Background: Ross syndrome is diagnosed by the presence of segmental anhidrosis, areflexia, and tonic pupils. Fewer than 60 cases have been described in literature so far. There have been reports of presence of antibodies in such patients, suggesting an autoimmune pathogenesis. Methods: We describe the clinical profile in this case series of 11 patients with Ross syndrome and discuss the current status of autoimmunity in its pathogenesis and the management. Results: Of the 11 patients with Ross syndrome there was an almost equal sex distribution (male:female ratio was 1.17:1) and the mean age of onset of symptoms was 26 years. Patients took an average of 6 years to present to a tertiary center. Sixty-three percent of the patients presented with complaints of excessive sweating, whereas only 27% had complaints of decreased sweating over a particular area of the body. Only 45% of the patients had the complete triad of Ross syndrome, which included segmental anhidrosis, tonic pupil, and absent reflexes. Eighty-nine percent of the patients had documented absent sympathetic skin response on electromyography. The various markers of autoimmunity were negative in all patients who were investigated for the same in this series. Ninety percent of the patients were managed conservatively. Conclusions: These findings suggest that, in Ross syndrome, generalized injury to ganglion cells or their projections are not purely autoimmune-mediated.

Objective background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a questionnaire that has been developed to help physicians around the world diagnose a patient’s cognitive ability. Available in multiple languages and for use in multiple countries worldwide, the goal of this study was to validate the alternate versions 2 and 3 of the French MoCA test to assist physicians in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), while decreasing the learning effect upon frequent testing. Methods: A validation study was conducted at the MoCA Clinic and Institute in Québec, Canada. The subject population consisted of 25 patients diagnosed with MCI meeting Petersen criteria and 25 healthy subjects serving as the normal control (NC) group. Three MoCA test versions were administered in the French language in random order within one session. Scores obtained in all three versions in MCI and NC groups were assessed for reliability and consistency from one version to the next. Results: On average, scores obtained in each subject group (MCI and NC) fell within their corresponding diagnostic ranges (score above 26 points for NC patients versus scores below 26 points for MCI patients). Difference in scores observed between the original French MoCA version and the two alternate versions in each subject cohort were minimal and not considered clinically significant. Conclusions: All three test versions of the French MoCA are considered equivalent in diagnostic reliability and consistency and contribute to decreasing the potential learning effect when patients are required to repeat the test frequently.