Background and objective: The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the preparation and discharge times, the side-effects and patient satisfaction after gynaecological outpatient procedures performed using either spinal block or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.

Methods: With Ethics Committee approval and written informed consent, 40 healthy females scheduled for hysteroscopic ablation of endometrial neoplasm were randomly allocated to receive either a spinal block with bupivacaine 0.5% hyperbaric solution 10 mg (n = 20) or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil (n = 20). Preparation and discharge times, as well as occurrence of untoward events and anaesthesiarelated costs, were recorded.

Results: The median (range) preparation time was 7 (7–10) min with general anaesthesia, and 11 (7–21) min with spinal block (P = 0.00005). No differences in discharge time from the postanaesthesia care unit and incidence of hypotension or bradycardia, or both, were reported between the two groups. Hospital discharge times were 156 (101–345) min after general anaesthesia and 296 (195–720) min after spinal anaesthesia (P = 0.0005). Acceptance of the anaesthesia technique was better after general (100%) than after spinal anaesthesia (75%) (P = 0.04). No differences in total costs were reported between spinal block (€155 (€117–€224)) and propofol-remifentanil general anaesthesia (€143 (€124–€203) (P = 0.125)).

Conclusions: Accurate titration of short-acting intravenous anaesthetic drugs such as propofol and remifentanil results in shorter preparation times and earlier home discharge after outpatient gynaecological procedures compared with spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg, with better patient acceptance and no increased costs.

Background and objective: To evaluate preparation and discharge times as well as the anaesthesia-related costs of out-patient knee arthroscopy performed with a combined sciatic-femoral nerve block, or a propofol-remifentanil general anaesthetic.

Methods: With Ethics Committee approval and written informed consent, 40 healthy patients were premedicated with intravenous midazolam (0.05 mg kg−1) and ketoprofen (50 mg). They were then randomly allocated to receive either a combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 25 mL mepivacaine 2% (15 mL for the femoral nerve, 10 mL for the sciatic nerve) (PNB group, n = 20), or a general anaesthetic with a continuous intravenous infusion of remifentanil (0.1–0.3 μg kg−1min−1) and propofol (target plasma concentration 2–4 μg mL−1) with a laryngeal mask airway (GA group, n = 20).

Results: The median (range) preparation time was 16 (10–28) min in the PNB group and 13 (8–22) min in the GA group (P = 0.015). Ten PNB patients were directly discharged to the day-surgery unit after the procedure as compared with one GA patient (P = 0.003). Discharge from the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) required 5 (5–20) min in the PNB group and 23 (7–95) min in the GA group (P = 0.001). Home discharge criteria were fulfilled after 277 (150–485) min in the PNB group and 170 (100–400)min in the GA group (P = 0.005). Costs related to the time spent in the PACU were lower for the PNB group (€1.10, range 0–22) compared with the GA group (€30, range €0–176) (P = 0.0005). There were no differences in total costs: PNB group €158 (range €105–194) versus GA group €160 (range €101–238) (P = 0.61).

Conclusions: In patients undergoing out-patient knee arthroscopy, the length of stay in the PACU can be shorter after a sciatic-femoral nerve block with a small volume of mepivacaine 2% compared with a propofol-remifentanil anaesthetic, and there is an increased likelihood that they will bypass the first phase of the postoperative recovery.

Background and objective Respiratory burst is an essential component of the neutrophil's biocidal function. In vitro, sodium thiopental, isoflurane and lidocaine each inhibit neutrophil respiratory burst. The objectives of this study were (a) to determine the effect of a standard clinical induction/tracheal intubation sequence on neutrophil respiratory burst and (b) to determine the effect of intravenous lidocaine administration during induction of anaesthesia on neutrophil respiratory burst.

Methods Twenty ASA I and II patients, aged 18–60 years, undergoing elective surgery were studied. After induction of anaesthesia [fentanyl (2 μg kg−1), thiopental (4–6 mg kg−1), isoflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.5–1.5%) in nitrous oxide (66%) and oxygen], patients randomly received either lidocaine 1.5 mg kg−1 (group L) or 0.9% saline (group S) prior to tracheal intubation. Neutrophil respiratory burst was measured immediately prior to induction of anaesthesia, immediately before and 1 and 5 min after lidocaine/saline.

Results Neutrophil respiratory burst decreased significantly after induction of anaesthesia in both groups [87.4 ± 8.2% (group L) and 88.5 ± 13.4% (group S) of preinduction level (P < 0.01 both groups)]. After intravenous lidocaine (but not saline) administration, neutrophil respiratory burst returned towards preinduction levels, both before (97.1 ± 23.6%) and after (94.4 ± 16.6%) tracheal intubation.

Conclusion Induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation using thiopentone and isoflurane, inhibit neutrophil respiratory burst. This effect may be diminished by the administration of lidocaine.

Background and Objective To investigate the response to general anaesthetics of different sodium channel subtypes, we examined the effects of pentobarbital, a close thiopental analogue, on single sodium channels from human ventricular muscle and compared them with existing data from human brain channels.

Methods Sodium channels from preparations of human ventricular muscle were incorporated into planar lipid bilayers in the presence of batrachotoxin, a sodium channel activator. Single channel currents were recorded in symmetrical 100mmolL−1 and 500mmolL−1 NaCl before and after the addition of the anaesthetic pentobarbital (0.34–1.34mmolL−1).

Results The blocking effect of pentobarbital on the fractional open time had an IC50 of 690 μmol L−1 in 500 mmolL−1 NaCl, whereas it had a significantly lower IC50 of 400 μmol L−1 in 100 mmolL−1 NaCl. Pentobarbital caused a significant shift of steady-state activation to hyperpolarized potentials (fmax = −42 mV, IC50=2 mmolL−1). This effect was independent of NaCl concentration.

Conclusion Despite pharmacological and electrophysiological differences between human cardiac and human brain sodium channels their responses to pentobarbital are similar. The finding of channel block being dependent on the electrolyte concentration is novel for sodium channels.

To evaluate the quality of intra-operative anaesthesia and recovery characteristics of two different anaesthesia regimens, 60 healthy women undergoing ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization procedures were randomly allocated to receive either a propofol/fentanyl or a midazolam/remifentanil based anaesthesia. The surgical procedure was successful in all patients and no severe side effects were reported by any patient. Four patients in the midazolam/remifentanil group (13%) would not accept the same anaesthetic procedure for further in vitro fertilization treatment due to intra-operative awareness, while all propofol/fentanyl patients were prepared to accept the same procedure again (P < 0.05). Patients in the propofol/fentanyl group required manual ventilation more frequently through a facemask than those patients treated with the midazolam/remifentanil combination (50% and 30%, respectively; P < 0.05). The time to achieve an Aldrete's score of 10 was shorter in the midazolam/remifentanil patients (2±2 min) than in those who received propofol/fentanyl (4±2 min) (P < 0.001), but no differences were observed in the time required to be ‘fit to discharge’ from the post-anaesthesia care unit. We conclude that the use of a midazolam/remifentanil regimen is as effective and safe as a fentanyl/propofol regimen in patients undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization procedures.

In order to compare interscalene brachial plexus block performed with ropivacaine or bupivacaine, 45 healthy, unpremedicated patients, undergoing elective shoulder surgery, were randomly allocated to receive interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 20 mL of either ropivacaine 0.75% (n=15), ropivacaine 1% (n=15), or bupivacaine 0.5% (n=15). Readiness for surgery (loss of pinprick sensation from C4 to C7 and inability to elevate the limb from the bed) was achieved later with bupivacaine 0.5% (28±15 min) than with ropivacaine 1% (10±5 min) (P=0.005) and ropivacaine 0.75% (15±8 min) (P=0.0005). No differences in success rate were observed between the three groups; however, seven patients receiving bupivacaine 0.5% required intra-operative analgesic supplementation (fentanyl 0.1 mg intravenous) compared with one patient receiving ropivacaine 0.75%, and two patients treated with ropivacaine 1% (P=0.02). The time from the block placement to first request for pain medication was similar in the three groups (10.7±2 h, 11±2.4 h, and 10.9±3.9 h after 0.75% and 1% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine, respectively). We conclude that interscalene brachial plexus block performed with 20 mL of either 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine allows for a prolonged post-operative pain relief, similar to that provided by bupivacaine 0.5%, with short onset time of surgical anaesthesia.

Ten patients, predicted to pose a difficult intubation of the trachea, underwent inhalational induction of anaesthesia using sevoflurane. In all 10 cases the airway was secured successfully and the patient proceeded to have the planned operation. In six of the cases the anaesthetist experienced a problem during the induction but in no case did this present any real difficulties or lead to a critical incident. We feel that sevoflurane has a place for inhalational induction in this challenging group of patients.

The isoflurane-saving and CO2-retaining effects of a charcoal filter were compared with a Siemens standard heat and moisture (HME) exchanger and an emptied specimen (dummy). Isoflurane was delivered during the inspiratory phase and consumption investigated at 10, 15 and 25 cycles min−1. The investigation was performed by ventilation with humidified air with a constant end-tidal CO2 and temperature. For a comparison, isoflurane was delivered in a conventional manner via the ventilator. The arrangement with a charcoal filter reduced the isoflurane consumption by a factor of 2.0−2.6, depending on ventilatory rate. Most of the saving was a result of the method of isoflurane delivery (factor 1.4−2.0), while adding the reflector gave a further reduction (factor 1.3−1.5). One circumstance that reduced the net efficiency of the charcoal filter was that it also reflected CO2; consequently, total minute ventilation had to be increased to maintain constant end-tidal CO2.

The antioxidant capacity of plasma taken from 10 patients before and during propofol anaesthesia was measured. Mean total plasma antioxidant activity fell from 1.73 to 1.64 mM L−1 trolox equivalents (P=0.047). This was caused by haemodilution since mean haemoglobin concentration fell from 13.0 to 12.5 g dL−1 (P=0.016). The time to 50% haemolysis (H50) of 10% red blood cell suspensions induced by 2,2'azo-bis(2-am-idinopropane) dihydrochloride (ABAP) was measured in blood from six patients. There was no change when red cells alone were studied, but when the patients' plasma was added to red cell suspensions (producing 10% plasma and 10% red cell suspensions), mean H50 increased from 291 to 308 min (P=0.049). Despite there being no overall increase in plasma antioxidant activity, the lipid soluble component of blood antioxidant activity appears to be increased by propofol.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted to assess the efficacy of intra-articular bupivacaine and diamorphine. Ninety-six day-case patients were allocated randomly to receive intra-articular injections of either 20 mL 0.9% saline (control, n = 35), 20 mL 0.5% plain bupivacaine (n = 31), or 20 mL 0.9% saline with 5 mg diamorphine (n = 30) prior to tourniquet release. Visual analogue scales (VAS) were completed at 1 h, 3 h (discharge) and 24 h, and supplementary analgesia noted. Intra-articular analgesics conferred a noticeable improvement in patient comfort. First, the quantity of supplementary analgesia required prior to discharge was significantly reduced (P = 0.016); second, patients reported a less disturbed night's sleep (P = 0.034).

There are only limited data on sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) in rats. This study was designed to determine the minimum alveolar concentration value for sevoflurane in younger and older rats. Minimum alveolar concentration determination was performed in spontaneously breathing animals, 9-week-old rats (younger, n = 8) and more than 13-month-old rats (older, n = 8). Rats were instrumented with a silastic catheter in the abdominal aorta via the femoral artery to allow for arterial blood gas sampling. Subsequently, minimum alveolar concentration for sevoflurane was determined in 40 younger and 38 older rats. Minimum alveolar concentration for sevoflurane in younger rats was significantly higher than in the older rats (2.68 ± 0.19 vs. 2.29 ± 0.19, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that minimum alveolar concentration for sevoflurane was not affected by the presence of an arterial catheter in the abdominal aorta (younger, 2.75 ± 0.08 vs. 2.67 ± 0.21; older, 2.23 ± 0.19 vs. 2.30 ± 0.18). Minimum alveolar concentration is profoundly affected by the age of the animal, but not by limited instrumentation.