Purely parallel neural networks can model object recognition in brief displays – the same conditions under which illusory conjunctions (the incorrect combination of features into perceived objects in a stimulus array) have been demonstrated empirically (Treisman 1986; Treisman & Gelade 1980). Correcting errors of illusory conjunction is the “tag-assignment” problem for a purely parallel processor: the problem of assigning a spatial tag to nonspatial features, feature combinations, and objects. This problem must be solved to model human object recognition over a longer time scale. Our model simulates both the parallel processes that may underlie illusory conjunctions and the serial processes that may solve the tag-assignment problem in normal perception. One component of the model extracts pooled features and another provides attentional tags that correct illusory conjunctions. Our approach addresses two questions: (i) How can objects be identified from simultaneously attended features in a parallel, distributed representation? (ii) How can the spatial selectional requirements of such an attentional process be met by a separation of pathways for spatial and nonspatial processing? Our analysis of these questions yields a neurally plausible simulation of tag assignment based on synchronizing feature processing activity in a spatial focus of attention.

We have investigated how the binocular control of prey capture in the praying mantis is affected by abnormally large vertical disparities, which were introduced by prisms placed in front of the eyes. The position of a target on the two retinae determines both the magnitude of head saccades made to fixate a target and its perceived distance. Over the wholerange of vertical disparities tested (up to at least 30 deg), the frequency of fixating saccades is normal while the amplitude of their vertical component is a compromise between the saccades specified by each eye individually. Distance measurements are not affected by imposed vertical disparities. But the larger the vertical disparity, the more reluctant the mantid is to strike at the target until disparities exceed 15 deg when no strikes are elicited at all.

The oculomotor system has long been thought to rely on an accurate representation of eye displacement or position in a successful attempt to reconcile a stationary target's retinal instability (caused by motion of the eyes) with its corresponding spatial invariance. This is in stark contrast to perceptual localization, which has been shown to rely on a sluggish representation of eye displacement, achieving only partial compensation for the retinal displacement caused by saccadic eye movements. Recent studies, however, have begun to cast doubt on the belief that the oculomotor system posseses a signal of eye displacement superior to that of the perceptual system. To verify this, five humans and one monkey (Macaca nemesthna) served as subjects in this study of oculomotor localization abilities. Subjects were instructed to make eye movements, as accurately as possible, to the locations of three successive visual stimuli. Presentation of the third stimulus (2-ms duration) was timed so that it fell before, during, or after the subject's saccade from the first stimulus to the second. Localization errors in each subject (human and nonhuman) were consistent with the hypothesis that the oculomotor system has access to only a damped representation of eye displacement —a representation similar to that found in perceptual localization studies.

Visual tasks that are perceptually diverse might be expected to elicit unique evoked-potential waveforms that exhibit differing topographic maps. To investigate this possibility, multichannel visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in response to several dot spatial localization stimuli that are physically similar yet produce different percepts (vernier offsets, stereoscopic disparity, bisection, orientation, and relative displacement) to determine if the unique percepts arising from these stimuli reflect the activation of different cortical neural populations. The resulting evoked potentials were all similar in waveform, although the stereoscopic VEPs were relatively delayed. Topographic maps of the evoked-potential activity to each stimulus revealed a late major component with two independent foci: one 7 or more centimeters above the inion lateral to the midline, and the other at least 6 cm lateral to Oz. The scalp localization of both peaks was independent of both the position of the stimulus in the visual field and the particular stimulus cue presented. An asymmetric response to pattern appearance vs. disappearance indicated strong pattern specificity for each stimulus type except unreferenced motion. The timing of the VEP responses and relative insensitivity to retinal locus of stimulation suggest the involvement of higher cortical areas. The two map foci might be interpreted as activation of inferotemporal and parietal cortices whose roles are thought to be visual object interpretation and spatial attention and localization, respectively.