With a decline exceeding 30% over three generations, the once-common European Turtle-dove is now considered globally threatened by IUCN. As a legal game species in 10 European countries, the recent International Single Species Action Plan for this species highlighted the need to carry out an assessment of the sustainability of current levels of hunting. In 2013–2014, the Western European population was estimated at 1.3–2.1 million pairs, and the hunting bag in the same region to be 1.1 million birds. Using the Demographic Invariant Method, we assessed whether current levels of hunting harvest within Europe constitute overexploitation of the western flyway European Turtle-dove population. We calculated the maximum growth rate λmax that a population might achieve in the absence of any additive mortality. Then we estimated the potential maximum harvestable population fraction (P) allowed by excess population growth. We explored a wide range of plausible scenarios relating to assumed demographic rates, geographic scope of the flyway and management objectives. λmax was estimated to lie between 1.551 and 1.869. Current levels of hunting along the western flyway are more than double the sustainable fraction (P) under all suitably conservative scenarios, and only fall below this threshold under the most restrictive assumptions. We conclude that current levels of legal hunting along the western flyway are unlikely to be sustainable. Reducing uncertainty associated with assessments of the sustainability of turtle dove hunting will require improved information on (in order of decreasing importance) current levels of hunting, adult survival, age structure and population size.

Bycatch in longline fisheries is considered one of the main threats for the conservationof albatrosses and petrels worldwide. However, the relative impact of fisheries on all theaffected populations or species still remains poorly understood. This paper applied aProductivity and Susceptibility Analysis (PSA) and the concept of “Potential BiologicalRemoval Level” (PBR) to assess the relative impact caused by the Uruguayan pelagiclongline fishery on several populations. This two-step approach allowed us to obtain anobjective view of the relative impact of the Uruguayan pelagic longline fleet on most ofthe populations or species of albatrosses and petrels with high association with thisfishery. Of fifteen species considered, fourteen were finally assessed and a ranking ofrisk derived. The concept of PBR was applied to the nine most at-risk species. The impactof fishing on populations could not be straightforwardly inferred from their bycatchrates. Results indicate that large albatrosses (Diomedea spp.) andThalassarche chlororhynchos are more affected than some of the mainspecies caught by the fishery (i.e. Thalassarche melanophrys andProcellaria aequinoctialis). Diomedea exulans fromSouth Georgia is likely to be the population most affected by the Uruguayan fleet. Thiswork should be seen as a case study of the fisheries operating in the southwesternAtlantic. The Uruguayan fleet within its operation area was responsible for only the 4.3%to 12.5% of the total annual effort deployed by the different fleets during 2004–2008. Thecombined impact of these fleets could be sufficiently high to account for many of theobserved declines in the populations of D. exulans, D. dabbenenaand T. chlororhynchos. However, the seabird bycatch numbers formost of the pelagic longline fleets that operate in the southwest Atlantic remain unknown.Applying mitigation measures to reduce the impact of pelagic longline fleets operating inthis region should be considered a high priority.