Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:53:29.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Chlorsulfuron in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and in a Wheat-Soybean (Glycine max) Double-Cropping System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Khosro Khodayari ,
Robert E. Frans  and
Khalid H. Akkari
Khosro Khodayari
Affiliation:
Rice Res. and Ext. Ctr., Stuttgart, AR 72160
Robert E. Frans
Affiliation:
Altheimer Lab., Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Khalid H. Akkari
Affiliation:
Altheimer Lab., Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino] carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide} was evaluated for weed control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and for residual effect on soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] following wheat. Chlorsulfuron applied at 72 g ai/ha and less did not injure or reduce grain yields of ‘Double-Cropped’ wheat. Postemergence tank mixtures of chlorsulfuron at 36 g/ha with diclofop {(±)-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propanoic acid} at 1 kg/ha were more effective than other treatments for control of wild garlic (Allium vineale L. ♯ ALLVI). ‘Forrest’ soybeans did not show any injury from chlorsulfuron residue even at rates of 72 g/ha when it was no-till seeded following winter wheat.

Keywords

PersistenceantagonismtoleranceAllium vinealeALLVI
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , September 1985 , pp. 746 - 749
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brewster, B. D. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotation crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31:861–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chow, P.N.P. 1983. Chlorsulfuron in mixtures with other herbicides for control of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) and other weeds in grain crops. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 19:16.Google Scholar
3. French, C. M., Peeper, T., and Santelmann, P. W. 1978. Wheat susceptibility to phenoxyalkanoic herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:70.Google Scholar
4. Hall, C., Edgington, L. V., and Switzer, C. M. 1982. Effect of chlorsulfuron or 2,4-D upon diclofop-methyl efficacy in oat (Avena sativa). Weed Sci. 30:672–676.Google Scholar
5. Khodayari, K., Frans, R. E., and Collins, F. C. 1983. Diclofop – a selective herbicide for Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 31:436–438.Google Scholar
6. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1983. Chlorsulfuron for weed control in fallow. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 19:18.Google Scholar
7. Ray, T. B. 1980. Studies on the mode of action of DPX-4189. Proc. Brit. Crop Prot. Conf.–Weeds 1:7–14.Google Scholar
8. Retzinger, J. E. and Richard, P. A. 1983. Controlling weeds in wheat. Louisiana Agric. 27(1):14–15.Google Scholar
9. Ritter, R. L. and Harris, T. C. 1983. Residual effects of chlorsulfuron on double cropped soybeans. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 19:20.Google Scholar
10. Stone, J. R. and Bingeman, C. W. 1982. Postemergence activity of DPX-4189 on problem broadleaf weeds in cereals. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 17:25.Google Scholar
11. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1980. The basis of the antagonistic effect of 2,4-D on diclofop-methyl toxicity to wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 28:371–377.Google Scholar
12. Wiese, A. F., Lavake, D. E., and Chenault, E. W. 1981. DPX-4189 controls weeds in wheat. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 17:25.Google Scholar