Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:13:23.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tidal Effects on Globular Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

P. Seitzer
P. Seitzer*
Affiliation:
Kitt Peak National Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatories* P. O. Box 26732 Tucson, Arizona 85726

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It was von Hoerner (1957) who pointed out that the tidal field of the Galaxy imposed a boundary condition on the size of globular clusters, a fact that had observational consequences when the first deep star counts became available (King 1962). More recently, though, dispute (cf Innanen, et al. 1983) has arisen over the identification of the observed limiting radius from star counts with that predicted by simple dynamical theory (King 1962, 1966; Szebehely 1967). Straightforward application of the classical three body problem seemed to imply that no stable stellar orbits would be found beyond the collinear Lagrangian points. Thus, to first order, the observed limiting radius would be just the radius of the inner Langrangian point L2 from the cluster center. For clusters in eccentric orbits, the tidal radius would be set at perigalacticon, where the tidal force is strongest. Numerical models of stellar orbits about a cluster in a realistic galactic potential by several authors (Jefferys 1976; Keenan and Innanen 1975; Keenan 1981) showed that stable orbits can exist with apocluster distances greater than rL2, due to the presence of non algebraic integrals of the motion that constrained the stars to move in a restricted region about the cluster rather than escaping.

Type
May 31: External Fields and Finite-Star-Size Effects
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 113: Dynamic of Stars Clusters , 1985 , pp. 343 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1985 

References

Freeman, K. C., Seitzer, P. and Norris, J. 1984, in preparation.Google Scholar
Innanen, K. A., Harris, W. E. and Webbink, R. F. 1983, A. J., 88, 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferys, W. H. 1976, A. J., 81, 983.Google Scholar
Keenan, D. W. 1981, Astron. and Astrophys., 95, 340.Google Scholar
Keenan, D. W. and Innanen, K. A. 1975, A. J., 80, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, I. R. 1962, A. J., 67, 471.Google Scholar
King, I. R. 1966, A. J., 71, 64.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. J. 1974, Ap. J. Letters, 190, L17.Google Scholar
Szebehely, V. 1967, Theory of Orbits (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
von Hoerner, S. 1957, Ap. J., 125, 451.Google Scholar