Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:52:17.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mental Models in Deductive Reasoning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Juan A. García-Madruga*
Affiliation:
National Open University(UNED)
Francisco Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
National Open University(UNED)
Nuria Carriedo
Affiliation:
National Open University(UNED)
Sergio Moreno
Affiliation:
University of Granada
Philip N. Johnson-Laird
Affiliation:
Princeton University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Juan A. García-Madruga, Dpto. de Psicología Evolutiva. Facultad de Psicología. UNED. 28040 Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We report research investigating the role of mental models in deduction. The first study deals with conjunctive inferences (from one conjunction and two conditional premises) and disjunctive inferences (from one disjunction and the same two conditionals). The second study examines reasoning from multiple conditionals such as: If e then b; If a then b; If b then c; What follows between a and c? The third study addresses reasoning from different sorts of conditional assertions, including conditionals based on if then, only if, and unless. The paper also presents research on figural effects in syllogistic reasoning, on the effects of structure and believability in reasoning from double conditionals, and on reasoning from factual, counterfactual, and semifactual conditionals. The findings of these studies support the model theory, pose some difficulties for rule theories, and show the influence on reasoning of the linguistic structure and the semantic content of problems.

En este trabajo presentamos varios estudios que investigan la construcción y manipulación de modelos mentales en el razonamiento deductivo. El primer estudio trata sobre inferencias conjuntivas (formadas a partir de una conjunción y dos condicionales) y disyuntivas (formadas a partir de una disyunción y los mismos dos condicionales). El segundo estudio examina la construcción e integración de modelos y el razonamiento a partir de problemas de condicionales múltiples como: Si e, entonces b; Si a, entonces b; Si b, entonces c. ¿Qué se puede concluir entre a y b? El tercer estudio aborda la representación y el razonamiento a partir de los condicionales con a menos que y su comparación con los condicionales formulados mediante si, entonces; sólo si; y a menos que. Por último, brevemente, se presenta la investigación llevada a cabo sobre el efecto de la figura en el razonamiento silogístico, el efecto de la estructura y la credibilidad en los condicionales dobles, y las diferencias en el razonamiento entre los condicionales fácticos, contrafácticos y semifácticos. Los resultados de estos estudios apoyan la teoría de los modelos mentales, plantean dificultades a las teorías de reglas y ponen de manifiesto la influencia sobre el razonamiento de la formulación lingüística, la estructura y el contenido semántico de los problemas.

Type
Research trends
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrouillet, P., Grosset, N., & Lecas, J.-F. (2000). Conditional reasoning by mental models: Chronometric and developmental evidence. Cognition, 75, 237266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braine, M.D.S. (1978). On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic. Psychological Review, 85, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M.D.S. (1990). The “natural logic” approach to reasoning. In Overton, W.F. (Ed.), Reasoning, necessity and logic: Developmental perspectives (pp. 135157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Braine, M.D.S., & O'Brien, D.P. (1991). A theory of If: A lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic principles. Psychological Review, 98, 182203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M.D.S., Reiser, B.J., & Rumain, B. (1984). Some empirical justification for a theory of natural propositional reasoning. In Bower, G.H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 1. (pp. 313371). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, R.M.J., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1989). Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 564575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R.M.J., & Tasso, A. (1999). Deductions from factual, possible and counterfactual conditionals. Memory & Cognition, 27, 726740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carriedo, N., García-Madruga, J., Gutiérrez, F., & Moreno, S. (1999, November). How does content affect ‘unless’ conditional reasoning?Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science (pp. 271277). Sienna, Italy.Google Scholar
Delval, J.A., & Carretero, M. (1979). La adquisición de las conectivas proposicionales. In Delval, J. A. (Ed.), Lecturas de psicología del niño. (Vol. 2, pp. 178194). Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
Dickstein, L.S. (1978). The effects of figure on syllogistic reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 6, 7683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espino, O., Santamaría, C., & García-Madruga, J.A. (2000a). Activation of end-terms in syllogistic reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 6, 6789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espino, O., Santamaría, C., & García-Madruga, J.A. (2000b). Figure and difficulty in syllogistic reasoning. Current Psychology of Cognition, 19, 417428.Google Scholar
St. Evans, J.B.T. (1977). Linguistic factors in reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 297306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Evans, J.B.T. (1993). The mental model theory of conditional reasoning: Critical appraisal and revision. Cognition, 48, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Evans, J.B.T., & Beck, M.A. (1981). Directionality and temporal factors in conditional reasoning. Current Psychological Research, 1, 111120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Evans, J.B.T., Clibbens, J., & Rood, B. (1995). Bias in conditional inference: Implications for mental models and mental logic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 644670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Evans, J.B.T., Newstead, S.E., & Byrne, R.M.J. (1993). Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
St. Evans, J.B.T. & Over, D.E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fillenbaum, S. (1976). Inducements: On phrasing and logic of conditional promises, threats and warnings. Psychological Research, 38, 231250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillenbaum, S. (1986). The use of conditionals in inducements and deterrents. In Traugott, E.C., ter Meulen, A., Reilly, J.S., & Ferguson, C.A. (Eds.), On conditionals (pp. 179195). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Madruga, J.A. (1982). Un estudio sobre el efecto de la figura en el razonamiento silogístico. Estudios de Psicología, 11, 2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Madruga, J.A., Carriedo, N., Moreno, S., Gutiérrez, F., & Schaeken, W. (2002). Reasoning from different conditional statements: Unless versus if then, if not then and only if. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
García-Madruga, J.A., Moreno Ríos, S., Carriedo, N., & Gutiérrez, F. (1999). Task, premise order and strategies in Rips's conjunction-disjunction and conditionals problems. In D'Ydewalle, G., Schaeken, W., Vandierendonk, A., & De Vooght, G. (Eds.), Deductive reasoning and strategies (pp. 4971). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
García-Madruga, J.A., Moreno, S., Carriedo, N., & Gutiérrez, F. (2000). Time measures in Rips's problems. In García-Madruga, J.A., Carriedo, N., & González Labra, M..J. (Eds.), Mental models in reasoning (pp. 213226). Madrid: UNED.Google Scholar
García-Madruga, J.A., Moreno, S., Carriedo, N., Gutiérrez, F., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (2001). Are conjunctive inferences easier than disjunctive inferences? A comparison of rules and models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54 A, 613632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geis, M. L. (1973). If and unless. In Kachru, B. B., Lees, R. B., Malkiel, Y., Pietrangeli, A., & Saporta, S. (Eds.), Issues in linguistics (pp. 231253). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Girotto, V., Mazzoco, A., & Tasso, A. (1997). The effect of premise order in conditional reasoning: A test of the mental model theory. Cognition, 63, 128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutiérrez, F., García-Madruga, J.A., Carriedo, N., & Moreno, S. (2000). Reasoning with multiple conditionals. When do reasoners construct mental models? In García-Madruga, J.A., Carriedo, N., & González Labra, M.J. (Eds.), Mental models in reasoning. (pp. 283297). Madrid: UNED.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Martínez, F., García-Madruga, J.A., Johnson-Laird, P.N., & Carriedo López, N. (2002). Razonamiento con condicionales múltiples. La perspectiva de los modelos mentales. Anuario de Psicología, 33, 224.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1975). Models of deduction. In Falmagne, R.J (Ed.), Reasoning: Representation and process (pp. 754). Springdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (2000). The current state of the mental model theory. In García-Madruga, J.A., Carriedo, N., & González Labra, M.J. (Eds.), Mental models in reasoning (pp. 1640). Madrid: UNED.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnson-Laird, P.N., & Bara, B.G. (1984). Syllogistic inference. Cognition, 16, 161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson-Laird, P.N., & Byrne, R.M.J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P.N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (in press). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics and inference. Psychological Review.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Byrne, R., & Schaeken, W. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 99, 418439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1993). Focussing in reasoning and decision making. Cognition, 49, 3766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno-Ríos, S., & García-Madruga, J.A. (in press). El desarrollo del razonamiento sobre lo que podría haber ocurrido: condicionales indicativos y subjuntivos. Infancia y Aprendizaje.Google Scholar
Moreno-Ríos, S., García-Madruga, J.A., & Byrne, R.M. (2002). The effects of linguistic mood on ‘if’: semifactual and counterfactual conditionals. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Oaksford, M. (2001). Language processing, activation and reasoning: A reply to Espino, Santamaría and García-Madruga. Thinking & Reasoning, 7, 205208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polk, T.A., & Newell, A. (1995). Deduction as verbal reasoning. Psychological Review, 102, 533566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1972). Methods of logic (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Riggs, K.J., & Peterson, D.M. (2000). Counterfactual thinking in pre-school children: Mental state and causal inferences. In Mitchell, P. & Riggs, K.J. (Eds.), Children's reasoning and the mind (pp. 8799). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Rips, L.J. (1983). Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 3871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rips, L.J. (1990). Paralogical reasoning: Evans, Johnson-Laird, and Byrne on liar and truth-teller puzzles. Cognition, 36, 291314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rips, L.J. (1994). The Psychology of proof: Deductive reasoning in human reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamaría, C., Espino, O., & García-Madruga, J.A. (2001). Theories of reasoning and the representational level: A reply to Oaksford. Thinking and reasoning, 7, 209213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamaría, C., García-Madruga, J.A., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1998). Reasoning from double conditionals: The effects of logical structure and believability. Thinking and Reasoning, 4, 97122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeken, W., Garcia-Madruga, J.A., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1997). Unless reasoning. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Van der Henst, J-B., Yang, Y., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (in press). Strategies in sentential reasoning. Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Wright, P., & Hull, A.J. (1986). Answering questions about negative conditionals. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 691709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, P., & Hull, A. J. (1988). Reading to do: Creating contingent action plans. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 187211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar