Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:11:34.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The industrialization of war*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

William H. McNeill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In limited degree, of course, industry and warfare have been connected from the earliest times. Weapons are what make human muscles formidable; and from the dawn of civilization it took specialized craftsmen to make weapons out of metal In the course of time the amount of metal used by warriors tended to increase; and the size of armies may also have grown greater—though with such ups and downs that no very definite growth pattern here emerges before the wars of the French Revolution.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , July 1982 , pp. 203 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rehfeld, Paul, ‘Die preussische Riistungslndustrie unter Friedrich dem Grossen’, Forschungen zur Brandenburgischen und Preussischen Geschichte, 55 (1944), p. 30.Google Scholar

2. Glover, Richard, Peninsular Preparation, 1795–1809 (Cambridge, 1963), p. 47.Google Scholar

3. Hyde, Charles K., Technological Change and the British Iron Industry, 1700–1870 (Princeton, 1977), p. 115.Google Scholar

4. Fries, Russell, ‘British Response to the American System: The Case of the Small Arms Industry after 1850’, Technology and Culture, 16 (1975), pp. 377–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosenberg, Nathan, (ed.), The American System of Manufactures (Edinburgh, 1969).Google Scholar

5. Showalter, Dennis, Railroads and Rifles: Soldiers; Technology and the Unification of Germany (Hamden, Conn., 1975).Google Scholar

6. Hamilton, Lord George, Parliamentary Reminiscences and Reflections, 1886–1906 (London, 1922), pp. 220–21.Google Scholar

7. Scott, J. D., Vickers, a History (London, 1962), p. 42.Google Scholar

8. Ashworth, W., ‘Economic Aspects of Late Victorian Naval Administration’, Economic History Review, 22 (1969), pp. 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Marder, Arthur, British Naval Policy 1880–1905: The Anatomy of British Sea Power (London, n.d.), pp. 25–37.Google Scholar

10. Pollen, Anthony, The Great Gunnery Scandal: The Mystery of Jutland (London, 1980)Google Scholar; Sumida, Jon, ‘British Capital Ships and Fire Control in the Dreadnought Era: Sir John Fisher, Arthur Hungerford Pollen and the Battle Cruiser’, Journal of Modern History, 51 (1979), pp. 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Cf. Trebilcock, Clive, ‘“Spin Off” in British Economic History: Armaments and Industry, 1760–1914’ Economic History Review, 22 (1969), pp. 474–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. Gille, Bertrand, La sidérurgie française au XIX' siècle (Geneva, 1968).Google Scholar

13. Boelcke, W. A., Krupp und die Hohenzollern in Dokumenten (Frankfurt am Main, 1970), Appendix.Google Scholar

14. Cf. Roy, Joseph A., Histoire de lafamille Schneider et du Creusot (Paris, 1962), pp. 88–89Google Scholar; for Vicker's strategy in foreign markets, Trebilcock, Clive, The Vickers Brothers: Armaments and Enterprise 1854–1914 (London, 1977)Google Scholar is especially instructive.

15. Cf. Berghahn, Volker R., Die Tirpitz Plan: Genesis und Verfall einer innenpolitischen Krisenstrategie unter Wilhelm II (Dusseldorf, 1971)Google Scholar for a compendious summary and analysis.