Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T22:26:42.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘New’ History of Science: Implications for Philosophy of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Rachel Laudan
Rachel Laudan*
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is the fall of 1992. A certain young graduate student—let us call her Sue Smithson—has just completed her comprehensives at a leading graduate school in history of science—let us say Cambridge, or San Diego, or Princeton for the sake of argument. She now has to decide on her dissertation topic. Let us eavesdrop as she ruminates about what it should be.

Type
Part XIV. What Has the History of Science to Say to the Philosopy of Science?
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1992 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1992 , 1993 , pp. 476 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abir-Am, P. (1992), “A Historical Ethnography of a Scientific Anniversary in Molecular Biology: The First Protein X-Ray Photograph (1984, 1934)'', Social Epistemology. 6: 323-54.Google Scholar
Ash, M. G. (1992), “Historicizing Mind Science”, Science in Context.5: 193-207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensaude-Vincent, B. (1992), “The Balance: Between Chemistry and Politics”, The Chemical Revolution: Context and Practices. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 33: 217-237.Google Scholar
Buchwald, J. (1993), “Waves, Philosophers and Historians”, in PSA 1992, Volume Two, D. Hull, M. Forbes, and K. Okruhlik (eds). East Lansing: Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinski, J. (1992), “The Chemical Revolution and the Politics of Language”, The Chemical Revolution : Context and Practices. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 33: 238-251.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1992), Francis Bacon: The State and the Reform of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McEvoy, J. (1992), “The Chemical Revolution in Context.”, The Chemical Revolution: Context and Practices. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 33: 198-216.Google Scholar
Ophir, A. and Shapin, S. (1991), ‘'The place of knowledge: A methodological survey”, Science in Context. 4: 3-21.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. (l992a), “Introduction”, The Chemical Revolution: Context and Practices. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 33: 195-98.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. (1992b), “Condillac, Lavoisier, and the Instrumentalization of Science”, The Chemical Revolution : Context and Practices. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 33: 252-71.Google Scholar
Schaffer, S. and Shapin, S. (1985), Leviathan and the Air Pump : Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. (1984), “Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology”, Social Studies of Science 14: 481-520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, N. (1988), “Mediating Machines”, Science in Context 2: 77-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar