Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:45:08.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic and Political Expansion: The Case of Oudh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

P. J. Marshall
P. J. Marshall
Affiliation:
King's College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historians of the early phases of British conquest in India have until recent years given comparatively little attention to the economic elements in British expansion. Historians of the late nineteenth or early twentieth century generally portrayed conquest as a largely defensive reaction to French rivalry or to the instability created by the collapse of the Mughal empire. The commercial functions of the East India Company were largely ignored; if they were mentioned at all it was only to point out that the Directors of the Company believed that costly wars and conquests were incompatible with successful trade and therefore took a jaundiced view of the supposed ambitions of Warren Hastings and Wellesley. Wellesley. In 1948, however, in his John Company at Work, Professor Holden Furber both revealed a much more complex pattern of British economic interests in India, including an extremely vigorous private sector operating in the interstices of the Company's monopoly, and suggested a number of links between ‘economic contact between India and the west’ and the rise of British ‘imperialism’. More recently, historians have begun to examine such links in detail in studies of specific parts of India. The extent to which the British had entrenched themselves in the economic life of Bengal long before Plassey, was noted by Dr Bhattacharya in his The East India Company and the Economy of Bengal, a book which prompts questions about the extent to which Siraj-ud-daula or Mir Kasim were victims of British economic success.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , July 1975 , pp. 465 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

This paper was originally presented at the Director's study group on ‘India: Society in War, 1795–1808’, School of Oriental and African Studies, in 1974.Google Scholar

1 Holden, Furber, John Company at Work: A Study of European Expansion in India in the Late Eighteenth Century (Cambridge, Mass., 1948), p. 321.Google Scholar

2 Sukumar, Bhattacharya, The East India Company and the Economy of Bengal from 1704 to 1740 (London, 1954).Google Scholar

3 Pamela, Nightingale, Trade and Empire in Western India 1784–1806 (Cambridge, 1970).Google Scholar

4 ‘The First Century of British Colonial Rule in India: Social Revolution or Social Stagnation’, Past and Present, LVIII (1973), 142–3.Google Scholar

5 Cuthbert, Collin Davies, Warren Hastings and Oudh (London, 1939).Google Scholar

6 Basu, P., Oudh and the East India Company 1785–1801 (Lucknow, 1943).Google Scholar

7 Holden, Furber (ed.), The Private Record of an Indian Governor-Generalship (Cambridge, Mass., 1933), p. 66.Google Scholar

8 Smith's, R. evidence, 2nd Report, Select Committee, 1772, Reports from Committees of the House of Commons (London, 1803–1806), III, 289.Google Scholar

9 T. Rumbold's evidence, ibid, III, 268–9.

10 Vereist, H., A View of the Rise, Progress and Present State of the English Government in Bengal (London, 1772), appendix, pp. 183–91.Google Scholar

11 I[ndia] O[ffice] R[ecords], B[engal] P[ublic] C[onsultations], 26 June 1771, Range I, Vol. 49, pp. 180–2.Google Scholar

12 Gleig, G. R. (ed.),Memoirs of the Rt. Hon. Warren Hastings (London, 1841), I, 334.Google Scholar

13 Paxton's, W. and N. Middleton's evidence to Committee of Managers of Hastings's Impeachment, Add, MS. 24266, pp. 340–1, 346.Google Scholar

14 District Gazetteers of the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh, XLIII, Fyzabad, ed. Nevill, H. R. (Allahabad, 1905), pp. 41–2.Google Scholar

15 His gumashla was still farming the mahal in 1798 (Lurnsden, J. to Wellesley, 13 October 1798, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 236, pp. 546–7).Google Scholar

16 Paxton's evidence, Add. MS. 24266, p. 342.Google Scholar

17 Paxton's evidence, ibid, pp. 337–8.

18 I.O.R., Bengal Secret and Political Consultations, 6 June 1787, IV, 336.Google Scholar

19 Calcutta High Court Record, Supreme Court, Equity, Hyde v Ojagur Mull.Google Scholar

20 I.O.R., Bengal Secret and Political Consultations, 23 March 1787, II, 577–82.Google Scholar

21 Barlow to Cornwallis, 4 June 1787, Public Record Office, PRO 30/11/17, f. 4.Google Scholar

22 The report is in I.O.R., Bengal Secret and Political Consultations, 6 June 1787, IV, 298 ff.Google Scholar

23 Cornwallis to Ives, E., 1 October 1787, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 236, p.452.Google Scholar

24 Cornwallis to Wazir, 15 April 1787, ibid, 235, p. 415.

25 Barlow to Cornwallis, 4 June 1787, Public Record Office, PRO 30/11/17, f. 3.Google Scholar

26 Cherry, G. to Shore, J., 15 February 1796, Add, MS. 13522, f. 96.Google Scholar

27 ‘State of the Treaty’, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 634, pp. 165 ff.Google Scholar

28 Aitcheson, C. U., A Collection of Treaties, Engagements and Sanads (4th ed., Calcutta, 1909), I, 112–17.Google Scholar

29 ‘State of the Treaty’, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 634, p. 177.Google Scholar

30 Letter to Ives, E., 16 June 1788, Public Record Office, PRO 30/11/170, f. 69.Google Scholar

31 Cornwallis, to Wazir, , 12 08 1793, P[arliamentary] P[apers], 1806, XV, 223;Google ScholarCherry's, G. Memorandum, c. 21 January 1796, Add. MS. 13522, f. 111.Google Scholar

32 Cornwallis, to Wazir, , 29 January 1793, Ross, C. (ed.), Correspondence of Charles, First Marquis Cornwallis (London, 1859), II, 555.Google Scholar

33 Cherry, G. to Shore, J., 15 February 1796, Add. MS. 13522, ff. 98–9.Google Scholar

34 Routledge, J. to G. Mercer, 25 July 1802Google Scholar, Saletore, G. N. (ed.), Henry Wellesley's Correspondence (Allahabad, 1955), p. 33.Google Scholar

35 Seton, A. to H. Wellesley, 22 December 1801, India Office Library, MS Eur. E. 173, p. 87.Google Scholar

36 Ousley's, G. evidence, 20 June 1806, ‘Committee on Oude Charge’, P.P., 1806, XVII, 787.Google Scholar

37 Robertson, D. et al. , to Ceded Provinces Commission, 3 October 1802, Add. MS. 13561, f. 77.Google Scholar

38 Letter to Cherry, G., rec'd 21 January 1796, Add. MS. 13522, f. 106.Google Scholar

39 G.Cherry to J. Shore, 15 February 1796, ibid, f. 102.

40 Queiros, J. to G. Mercer, 30 January 1802 and to H. Wellesley, 23 September 1802, Add. MS. 33561, ff. 7–8, 76.Google Scholar

41 Memorial, R. Becher's, 11 April 1809, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 237, pp. 149–51.Google Scholar

42 See Orr's letters to Lumsden, J. and Scott, W. 26 January 1797, 24 September 1800, Add. MS. 13561, ff. 24–8.Google Scholar

43 I.O.R., B.P.C., 26 February 1787, Range 3, Vol. 30, p. 742.Google Scholar

44 I.O.R., B[engal] C[ommercial] R[eports], 1795–1802, Range 174, Vol. 13.Google Scholar

45 I.O.R., B.P.C., 26 June 1771, Range I,Vol. 49, p. 179.Google Scholar

46 Ibid, 26 December 1787, Range 3, Vol. 30, pp. 744–50.

47 I.O.R., B.C.R., 1795–1802, Range 174, Vol. 13.Google Scholar

48 See below, p. 475.Google Scholar

49 I.O.R., B.C.R., 1803, Range 174, Vol. 14, f. 59.Google Scholar

50 Cherry, G. to Shore, J., 15 February 1796, Add, MS. 13522, f. 104.Google Scholar

51 I.O.R., B.C.R., 1803, Range 174, Vol. 14, f. 60.Google Scholar

52 W. Scott to Wellesley, 22 October 1802, Add. MS. 13530, f. 30.Google Scholar

53 Letter to Wellesley, , 12 1802, P.P., 1806, XVI, 149.Google Scholar

54 G. Cherry to J. Shore, 15 February 1796, Add, MS. 13522, f. 104.Google Scholar

55 Letter to Lumsden, J., 23 February 1798, Add, MS. 13526, ff. 35–6.Google Scholar

56 Eg. Sinha, N. K., The Economic Hictory of Bengal (Calcutta, 1956–1962), I, 91–6.Google Scholar

57 I.O.R., Bengal Secret and Political Consultations, 6 June 1787, IV, 346–52.Google Scholar

58 I.O.R., B.P.C., 26 December 1787, Range 3, Vol. 30, pp. 744–6.Google Scholar

59 I.O.R., B.C.R., 1795–1802, Range 174, Vol. 13.Google Scholar

60 I.O.R., Bengal Revenue Consultations (Ceded Provinces), 10 March 1803, Range 90, Vol. 9.Google Scholar

61 I.O.R., B.C.R., 1803–1804, Range 174, Vol. 15, f. 99.Google Scholar

62 Report on the Commerce of Mau and Azeemgurh, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 583, pp. 187–201.Google Scholar

63 I.O.R., Bengal Revenue Consultations (Ceded Provinces), 9 June 1803, Range 90, Vol. 10.Google Scholar

64 H. Wellesley to S. Swinton, 14 September 1802, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 583, p. 254.Google Scholar

65 R. Becher to H. Wellesley, 18 – 1802, Add. MS. 13561, f. 170.Google Scholar

66 Milburn, W., Oriental Commerce (London, 1813), II, 215.Google Scholar

67 I.O.R., B.P.C., 17 April 1797, Range 4 Vol. 49, p. 681; B.C.R., 1795–1801, Range 174, Vol. 13.Google Scholar

68 I.O.R., B.P.C., 17 April 1797, Range 4, Vol. 49, pp. 667 ff.Google Scholar

69 I.O.R., Bengal Salt, Opium and Customs Consultations, 89 June 1797, 5 March 1798, Range 98, Vols 33, 34.Google Scholar

70 Twining, W. (ed.), Travels in India a Hundred Years Ago (London, 1893), p. 288.Google Scholar

71 United Provinces Gazetteers, VI, Aligarh, ed. Nevill, (Allahabad, 1909), p. 39.Google Scholar

72 This episode is fully described in Wright, H.R.C., ‘James Augustus Grant and the Gorakhpur Opium, 1789–1796’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1960), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

73 R. Frith to J. Law, 30 March 1802, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 235, p. 619.Google Scholar

74 Pringle, A. to Wellesley, H. 26 February 1802, Add. MS. 13561, ff. 14–15.Google Scholar

75 I.O.R., B.P.C., 26 – 1787, Range 3, Vol. 30, p. 666.Google Scholar

76 I.O.R., B.C.R., 1802–3, Range 174, Vol. 14, ff. 59–63; Bengal Revenue Consultations (Ceded Provinces), 10 March 1803, Range 90, Vol. 9.Google Scholar

77 Scott, W. to Wellesley, , 20 09 1799, P.P., 1806, XV, 272.Google Scholar

78 Letter to Lumsden, J., 23 December 1798, Add. MS. 13526, f. 36.Google Scholar

79 Wellesley, H. to Wellesley, 10 February 1803, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 583, p. 39.Google Scholar

80 Bengal Commercial Letter, 13 January 1804, Add. MS. 13434, f. 39.Google Scholar

81 R. Becher to H. Wellesley, 18 – 1802, Add. MS. 13561, f. 170; I.O.R., Bengal Revenue Consultations (Ceded Provinces), 30 June 1803, Range 90, Vol. 10.Google Scholar

82 Capt. Sydenham's statement, Add. MS. 13532, f. 25.Google Scholar

83 Letter to Scott, D., 25 March 1802, Add. MS. 37282, f. 407.Google Scholar

84 A copy of the Report, dated 29 May 1802 is in I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 582.Google Scholar

85 Wellesley, to Scott, W., 22 January 1801, N. Edmonstone to Scott, 27 May 1801, P.P., 1806, XV, 403–4, 467–9.Google Scholar

86 Scott, W. to Wellesley, , 22 10 1802, Add. MS. 13530, f. 30.Google Scholar

87 Becher's, R., Memorial 11 04 1809, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 237, p. 234.Google Scholar

88 Bayly, C. A., ‘Town Building in North India, 1790–1830’, Modern Asian Studies 9:4, 10 1975, pp. 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

89 See papers on Oudh debts, P.P., 1806, XV, 733 ff;Google ScholarMemorial of Monohur Doss and Seetul Baho, 14 August 1813, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 237, pp. 80 ff.Google Scholar

90 I.O.R., B.C.R., 1802–1803, Range 174, Vol. 14, f. 60.Google Scholar

91 Chaund Khawn's deposition, I.O.R., Home Miscellaneous, 237, p. 321.Google Scholar

92 I.O.R., B.C.R., 1803–1804, Range 174, Vol. 15 f. 99.Google Scholar

93 Siddiqi, A., Agrarian Change in a Northern Indian State (Oxford, 1973), pp. 140 ff.Google Scholar