Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T08:32:04.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Federalists in the Attic: Original Intent, the Heritage Movement, and Democratic Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Daniel Levin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the United States is often criticized for its lack of historical consciousness, historicity provides a compelling rhetorical trump in constitutional argument, particularly according to advocates of original understanding jurisprudence or “originalism.” Originalism has also proven to be quite popular as a constitutional position, especially in public discourse outside academe and the courts. I argue that originalism's appeal derives from Americans' interest in heritage. Using the literature on public history, memory, and cultural studies to distinguish the cultural phenomenon of heritage from history proper, I argue that originalism, like heritage, offers the possibility of an immediate and authentic encounter with the past tied to a critique of modernism as both antidemocratic and inauthentic. Originalism portrays the federal period as a special moment of civic unity, whose virtues have been preserved by the larger public, but have been eroded among elites by modernity.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , Winter 2004 , pp. 105 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1998. We the People-. Transformations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. 1994. The Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V. Columbia Law Review 94:457–508.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. 1998. The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Appleby, Joyce, Hunt, Lynn, and Jacob, Margaret. 1994. Telling the Truth about History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Barzun, Jacques, and Graff, Henry F. 1985. The Modem Researcher. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan. 1978. The American Jeremiad. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander. 1978. The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel. 1975. The Image. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1985. Foreword to The Constitution and Contemporary Constitutional Theory, ed. McDowell, Gary L., v–xi. Cumberland, Va.: Center for Judicial Studies.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1990. The Tempting of America. 1990. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1996. Slouching Towards Gomorrah. New York: Regan Books.Google Scholar
Brennan, William. 1990. The Constitution of the United States: Contemporary Ratification. In Rakove 1990.Google Scholar
Brest, Paul. 1990. The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding. In Rakove 1990.Google Scholar
Brisbin, Richard A. Jr. 1997. Justice Antonin Scalia and the Conservative Revival. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
Bruner, Edward M. 1994. Abraham Lincoln as Authentic Reproduction: A Crtique of Postmodernism. American Anthropologist 96: 397–415.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert. 1959. The Whig Interpretation of History. London: G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. [1915] 1982. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution-Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eisgruber, Christopher L. 2001. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, Michael. 1990. Laws, Men, and Machines: Modem American Government and the Appeal of Newtonian Mechanics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frisch, Michael. 1990. A Shared Authority: Essays on the Graft and Meaning of Oral and Public History. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Gardner, James A. 1991. The Positivist Foundations of Originalism: An Account and Critique. Boston University Law Review 71:1–45.Google Scholar
Gates, John B., and Phelps, Glenn A. 1996. Intentionalism in Constitutional Opinions. Political Research Quarterly 49: 245–61.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Michael J. 1994. A Tale of Two Textualists: A Critical Comparison of Justices Black and Scalia. Boston University Law Review 74:25–66.Google Scholar
Graglia, Lino A. 2000. Revitalizing Democracy. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 24:165–77.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Janelle. 2001. The Radical Face of the Ancient Constitution: St. Edward's Laws in Early Modem Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grieff, Constance. 1987. Independence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, ed. 1997. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Richard, and Gable, Eric. 1997. The New History in an Old Museum: Creating the Past at Colonial Williamsburg. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Richard, and Saxton, William. 1988. Dyssimulation: Reflexivity, Narrative and the Quest for Authenticity in Living History. Cultural Anthropology 3: 242–60.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Tony. 1998. Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Hosmer, Charles B. Jr. 1965. Presence of the Past: A History of the Preservation Movement in the United States before Williamsburg. New York: G. P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1996. The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kammen, Michael. 1986. A Machine That Would Go of Itself. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kammen, Michael. 1989. History Is Our Heritage. In Historical Literacy, ed. Gagnon, P. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Kammen, Michael. 1997. In the Past Lane: Historical Perspectives on American Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Max. 1937. The Constitution and Court as Symbols. Yale Law Journal 46:1290–1319.Google Scholar
Levin, Daniel. 1999. Representing Popular Sovereignty: The Constitution in American Political Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Daniel. 2001. When Good Lockeans Go Bad: The Political Theory of Right-Wing Constitutionalism. Polity 34:141–62.Google Scholar
Levy, Leonard W. 1988. Original Intent and the Framers' Constitution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lienesch, Michael. 1993. Redeeming America: Piety and Politics in the New Christian Right. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David. 1996. Possessed fry the Past: The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
MacCannell, Dean. 1973. Staged Authenticity: Arrangements of Social Space in Tourist Settings. American Journal of Sociology 79:589–603.Google Scholar
Maltz, Earl. 1987. Foreword: The Appeal of Originalism. Utah Law Review 1987:773–805.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Howard. 2000. The Same Ax, Twice: Restoration and Renewal in a Throwaway Age. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael. 1989. The Role of Democratic Politics in Transforming Moral Convictions into Law. Yale Law Journal 98:1501–43.Google Scholar
Monaghan, Henry P. 1981. Our Perfect Constitution. New York University Law Review 56:353–96.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1990. Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 2001. The Way We Talk Now: Commentaries on Language and Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Persons, Stow. 1954. The Cyclical Theory of History in Eighteenth Century America. American Quarterly 6:147–63.Google Scholar
Peterson, Richard A. 1997. Creating Country Music: Fabricating Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1985. Virtue, Commerce, and History. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1987. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Preface. 1993. In Our Peculiar Security: The Written Constitution and Limited Government, ed. Hickok, Eugene W., McDowell, Gary Lsurname, and Costopoulos, Philip J. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack N., ed. 1990. Interpreting the Constitution. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack N., ed. 1996. Original Meanings. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, Roy, and Thelen, David. 1998. The Presence of the Past: Popular Uses of History in American Life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1997. Common-Law Courts in a Civil Law System. In Gutmann 1997.Google Scholar
Schlereth, Thomas J. 1980. Artifacts and the American Past. Nashville: American Association for State and Local History.Google Scholar
Schultz, David. 1997. Scalia on Democratic Decision-Making and Long Standing Traditions. Suffolk University Law Review 31:319–48.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Hillel. 1996. The Culture of the Copy: Striking Likenesses, Unreasonable Facsimiles. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Shusterman, Richard. 1999. Moving Truth: Affect and Authenticity in Country Musicals. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57:221–33.Google Scholar
Singer, Milton. 1977. On the Symbolic and Historic Structure of an American Identity. Ethos 5:431–54.Google Scholar
Tribe, Lawrence H. Comment. In Gutmann 1997.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1999. Taking the Constitution away from the Courts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, Mike. 1996. Mickey Mouse History and Other Essays on American Memory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, William Lloyd. 1959. The Living and the Dead: A Study of the Symbolic Life of Americans. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Christopher. 1996. How to Read the Constitution: Originalism, Constitutional Interpretation, and Judicial Power. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon S. 1997. Comment. In Gutmann 1997.Google Scholar