Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:26:26.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law and Economics in the Personal Sphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Claire A. Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium on Law and Economics
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , Winter 2004 , pp. 219 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angier, Natalie. 2003. Opposites Attract Not in Real Life. New York Times, 8 July.Google Scholar
Ariely, Dan, Loewenstein, George, and Prelec, Drazen. 2003. Tom Sawyer and the Myth of Fundamental Value. MIT Working Paper. Ayres, Ian, and John Donohue III. 1987. Posner's Symphony No. 3: Thinking about the Unthinkable. Stanford Law Review 39:791–812.Google Scholar
Baker, Katharine. 1997. Once a Rapist? Motivational Evidence and Relevancy in Rape Law. Harvard Law Review 110:563–624.Google Scholar
Bank of Sweden and Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Press Release on Nobel Prize Award for Gary Becker,. http://www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/2001/Press.html.Google Scholar
Bank of Sweden and Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Information on Nobel Prize in Economics for George Akerlof, Joseph E. Stiglitz, and Michael Spence. Available at http://www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/2001/index.html.Google Scholar
Press Release on Nobel Prize Award for Daniel Kahneman. http://www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/2002/press.html.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1985. Antitrust in Transition: The Role of the Courts in Applying Economics. Speech presented at the 33d Annual Spring Meeting of the American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Cowen, Tyler. 2001. How Do Economists Think about Rationality? Manuscript. George Mason University.Google Scholar
Donohue, John J. III, and Levitt, Steven D. 2001. The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116:379–420.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1992. A Social Constructionist Critique of Posner's Sex and Reason: Steps Towards a Gay Legal Agenda. Yale Law Journal 102:333–86.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel A. 2001. Reviews: Toward a New Legal Realism, reviewing Behavioral Law and Economics. University of Chicago Law Review 68:279–303.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. 1993. The Hermeneutics of Reason: A Commentary on Sex and Reason. Connecticut Law Review 25:503–13.Google Scholar
Fisher, Helen. 1999. The First Sex. New York: Random House. Frank, Robert. Forthcoming. Departures from Rational Choice: With and Without Regret. In The Law and Economics of Irrational Behavior, ed. Parisi, F. and Smith, V. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert H., Gilovich, Thomas, and Regan, Dennis T. 1993. Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation Journal of Economic Perspectives 7:159–71.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1953. The Methodology of Positive Economics. In Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gasparino, Charles. 2002, Citigroup Investigation Now Leads to Door of Elite Nursery School. Wall Street Journal 14 November, A1 and A8.Google Scholar
Goodden, Herman. 2001. Abortion-Crime Link Chilling; Many of the World's Great Artists and Leaders Might Never Have Lived. London Free Press, 21 May, A9.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Shapiro, Ian. 1995. Pathologies Revisited: Reflections on Our Critics. Critical Review 9:235–80.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Lawrence A. 1997. Sex Offenses and Offenders: An Analysis of Data on Rape and Sexual Assault. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice; Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K. 1992. Flirting with Science: Richard Posner on the Bioeconomics of Sexual Man. Harvard Law Review 106:479–503.Google Scholar
Hill, Claire A. 1997. Why Financial Appearances Might Matter: An Explanation for “Dirty Pooling” and Other Financial Cosmetics. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 22:142–96.Google Scholar
Hill, Claire, and King, Christopher, (forthcoming 2004). How German Contracts Do as Much with Fewer Words. Chicago-Kent Law Review.Google Scholar
Howard, Joshua. 1997. Life … by Transplant. Sixty Minutes, 1 June. Huang, Peter. 2000. Reasons within Passions: Emotions and Intentions in Property Rights Bargaining. Oregon Law Review 79:435–77.Google Scholar
James, Caryn. 1991. Frugging with Wolves. New York Times, 13 Jan., sec. 2, p. 13.Google Scholar
Jaynes, Julian. 1990. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. 1997. Sex, Culture, and the Biology of Rape: Toward Explanation and Prevention. California Law Review 87:827–941.Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. 2001. Realities of Rape: Of Science and Politics, Causes and Meanings, reviewing Thornhill, Randy, and Craig T. Palmer, A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion. Cornell Law Review. 86:1386–422.Google Scholar
Ketelaar, T., and Clore, G.L. 1997. Emotions and Reason: Proximate Effects and Ultimate Functions. In Personality, Emotion, and Cognitive Science, ed. Matthews, G., pp. 355–96. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Korobkin, Russell B., and Ulen, Thomas S. 2000. Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics. California Law Review 88:1051–144.Google Scholar
Kubler, Dorothea. 2001. On the Regulation of Social Norms. Journal of Law and Economics and Organization 17:449–476.Google Scholar
Kysar, Douglas. 2003. The Expectations of Consumers. Columbia Law Review 103: 1700–1790.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O., Gagnon, John H., Michael, Robert T., and Michaels, Stuart. 1994-The Social Organisation of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lauro, Patricia Winters. 2003. Dating Sites Court Business Boom. Chicago Tribune, 29 Jan., 8.Google Scholar
Luban, David. 1996. Review Essay: The Posner Variations (Twenty-Seven Variations on a Theme by Holmes). Stanford Law Review 48:1001–36.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Paul. 2002. Norms and Signals: Some Skeptical Observations. University of Richmond Law Review 36:387–406.Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard. 1992. Relative Preferences. Yale Law Journal 102:1–104.Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard. 2000. A Focal Point Theory of Expressive Law. Virginia Law Review 86:1649–729.Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard. 2001. Signaling Discount Rates: Law, Norms, and Economic Methodology. Yale Law Journal 110:625–89.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre. 1998. The Rhetoric of Economics. 2d ed. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1992. Only Grey Matter? Richard Posner's Cost-Benefit Analysis of Sex. Chicago Law Review 59:1689–734.Google Scholar
O'Hara, Erin, and Yarn, Douglas. 2002. Apology and Consilience. Washington Law Review 77:1121–92.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1992. The Radical Feminist Critique of Sex and Reason. Connecticut Law Review 25:515–31.Google Scholar
Rabin, Matthew. 2002. Alfred Marshall Lecture: A Perspective on Psychology and Economics. European Economic Review 46:657–85.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 2001. Contested Commodities. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sanger, Carol. 1993. He's Gotta Have It. Southern California Law Review 66:1221–36.Google Scholar
SBS Television. 2003. The Cutting Edge: An Evil so Vile, http://www.sbs.com.au/whatson/index.php3?id=297.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 1985. Easy Cases. Southern California Law Review 58:399–400.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1987. In Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology, ed. Hogarth, Robin M. and Reder, Melvin W. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael. 1974. Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Susman, , Ed. 2003. AIDS: Africa, Center of the Epidemic. UPI Science News, http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030815-060309-9847r.Google Scholar
United States Census. 2000. http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/p20-537/2000/tabAl.pdf.Google Scholar
Wax, Emily. 2003. Kenyan Women Reject Sex “Cleanser”: Traditional Requirement for Widows Is Blamed for Aiding the Spread of HIV-AIDS. Washington Post, 18 August, A12.Google Scholar
West, Robin. 1993. Sex, Reason, and a Taste for the Absurd. Georgetown Law Journal. 81:2413–56.Google Scholar