Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:40:34.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of environment and heredity on lactation. II. Persistency of lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. Mahadevan
P. Mahadevan
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A statistical study of factors affecting variation in persistency of lactation has been made using 5000 lactation records from twelve leading herds of Ayrshire cattle in south-west Scotland for the period 1930–9.

2. It is suggested that a satisfactory numerical expression for the shape of the lactation curve could be obtained from the formula, Persistency = where A is the milk yield during the first 180 days and B is the initial milk yield, namely, the milk yield during the first ten weeks of lactation.

3. The interrelationships of persistency, initial milk yield and 180-day milk yield showed that these three characteristics are positively correlated with one another on a between cows within herd basis. This meant that it should be possible to combine high initial milk yield with high persistency to obtain increased total production.

4. The effect of month of calving on persistency of lactation varied significantly between herds. On the average, the highest persistency was attained by cows calving in the winter, and the lowest by summer calvers.

5. The variation of persistency with age showed that it is necessary to correct for the high persistency of first calvers when comparing cows with different lactations.

6. The average repeatability of persistency was 0.242 in the present material, while heritability was of the order of 0.10–0.15.

7. It has been concluded that improved feeding and management would bring about the greatest returns in the direction of improved persistency.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 41 , Issue 1-2 , January 1951 , pp. 89 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bonnier, G. (1935). Hereditas, Lund, 20, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, W. L. (1927). Bull. Ill. Agric. Exp. Sta. 288, 355.Google Scholar
Gaines, W. L. (1931). Int. Dairy Congr. Paper 13, p. 140.Google Scholar
Gooch, M. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 71.Google Scholar
Hazel, L. N., Baker, M. L. & Reinmiller, C. F. (1943). J. Anim.Sci. 2, 118.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. & Hansson, A. (1940). Kungl. Lantbruksakademiens Tidskrift. Specialhafte 3, 127 pp.Google Scholar
Kronacher, C., von Patow, C. & von Frings, P. (1936). Z. Zücht. 36, 119.Google Scholar
Ludwick, T. M. & Petersen, W. E. (1943). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 439.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, P. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, H. G. (1930). J. Agric. Sci. 20, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikka, L. C. (1940). Ph.D. Thesis: Glasgow University. 215 pp.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1933). J. Agric. Sci. 23, 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar