Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:26:57.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subjective Wellbeing in ASEAN: A Cross-Country Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2011

TAMBYAH SIOK KUAN  and
TAN SOO JIUAN
TAMBYAH SIOK KUAN
Affiliation:
Department of Marketing, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore [email protected]
TAN SOO JIUAN
Affiliation:
Department of Marketing, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our paper reports and discusses issues relating to subjective wellbeing in selected countries in ASEAN (The Association of Southeast Asian Nations), a regional organization that coordinates and promotes the economic, social and cultural interests of member countries in Southeast Asia. Comparisons will be made across the five founding members of ASEAN, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand using data from the 2004, 2006 and 2007 AsiaBarometer Surveys. The indicators of subjective wellbeing used are perceptions of happiness, enjoyment, and achievement. We also examined the impact of selected demographic and non-demographic variables on these indicators.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , December 2011 , pp. 359 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AsiaBarometer Survey 2004 (http://www.asiabarometer.org)Google Scholar
AsiaBarometer Survey 2006 (http://www.asiabarometer.org)Google Scholar
AsiaBarometer Survey 2007 (http://www.asiabarometer.org)Google Scholar
Diener, E. and Suh, E. (1997), ‘Measuring Quality of Life: Economic, Social, and Subjective Indicators’, Social Indicators Research, 40: 189–216.Google Scholar
Diener, E. and Suh, E. (2000, ‘Measuring Subjective Well-Being to Compare the Quality of Life of Cultures’, in Diener, E. and Suh, E.M. (eds.), Culture and Subjective Well-being, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
CIA, The World Factbook – Indonesia’ www.cia.gov/Google Scholar
CIA, The World Factbook – Malaysia’ www.cia.gov/Google Scholar
CIA, The World Factbook – Philippines’ www.cia.gov/Google Scholar
CIA, The World Factbook – Singapore’ www.cia.gov/Google Scholar
CIA, The World Factbook – Thailand’ www.cia.gov/Google Scholar
Cramer, V., Torgersen, S., and Kringlen, E. (2004), ‘Quality of Life in a City: The Effect of Population Density’, Social Indicators Research, 69: 103–16.Google Scholar
Lu, L. (1995), ‘The relationship between subjective well-being and psycho-social variables in Taiwan’, Journal of Social Psychology, 135 (3): 351–57.Google Scholar
Pichler, F. (2006), ‘Subjective Quality of Life of Young Europeans: Feeling Happy but who Knows Why?’, Social Indicators Research, 75: 419–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, D.C. and Rutkowski, C.P. (2003), ‘Subjective quality of Korean life in 1981 and 2001’, Social Indicators Research, 62,63, pp. 509–34.Google Scholar
Tambyah, S.K., Tan, S.J., and Kau, A.K. (2009), ‘The Quality of Life in Singapore’, Social Indicators Research, 92 (2): 337–76.Google Scholar
Trzcinski, E. and Holst, E. (2008), ‘Subjective well-being among young people in transition to adulthood’, Social Indicators Research, 87: 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar