Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:24:12.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protecting Free Trade: The Political Economy of Rules of Origin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2008

Kerry A. Chase
Kerry A. Chase
Affiliation:
Brandeis University, Waltham, Mass. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The design of rules of origin in free trade agreements (FTAs) arouses spirited lobbying campaigns that mostly escape public attention. This article argues that the domestic groups generally most favorable to FTAs differ in their preferences over rules of origin: industries with large returns to scale favor strict rules of origin to gain scale economies in an FTA, while industries with multinational supply chains prefer lenient rules of origin to accommodate offshore procurement. An econometric analysis of rules of origin in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) finds tougher rules of origin the higher the external trade protection and the larger the returns to scale, and more permissive rules of origin the greater the involvement in foreign sourcing. The results suggest that rules of origin may be critical to building domestic coalitions for FTAs. Industry preferences toward rules of origin therefore have important implications for the politics of FTA ratification.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 507 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alt, James E., and Gilligan, Michael. 1994. The Political Economy of Trading States: Factor Specificity, Collective Action Problems and Domestic Political Institutions. Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (2):165–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, John H., Goldstein, Judith L., Josling, Timothy E., and Steinberg, Richard H.. 2006. The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L., and Reinhardt, Eric. 1999. Industrial Location and Protection: The Political and Economic Geography of U.S. Nontariff Barriers. American Journal of Political Science 43 (3):1028–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A., and Tomlin, Brian W.. 2000. The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chase, Kerry A. 2003. Economic Interests and Regional Trading Arrangements: The Case of NAFTA. International Organization 57 (1):137–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Kerry A. 2005. Trading Blocs: States, Firms, and Regions in the World Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Destler, I. M. 2006. Rules of Origin and U.S. Trade Policy. In The Origin of Goods: Rules of Origin in Regional Trade Agreements, edited by Cadot, Olivier, Estevadeordal, Antoni, Suwa-Eisenmann, Akiko, and Verdier, Thierry, 173–87. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni. 2000. Negotiating Preferential Market Access: The Case of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Journal of World Trade 34 (1):141–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C., Hanson, Gordon H., and Swenson, Deborah L.. 2000. Offshore Assembly from the United States: Production Characteristics of the 9802 Program. In The Impact of International Trade on Wages, edited by Feenstra, Robert C., 85–122. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, Ronald, and Wellisz, Stanislaw. 1982. Endogenous Tariffs, the Political Economy of Trade Restrictions, and Welfare. In Import Competition and Response, edited by Bhagwati, Jagdish, 223–34. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Froot, Kenneth A., and Yoffie, David B.. 1991. Strategic Trade Policies in a Tripolar World. Working Paper 91-030. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawande, Kishore, and Bandyopadhyay, Usree. 2000. Is Protection for Sale? Evidence on the Grossman-Helpman Theory of Endogenous Protection. Review of Economics and Statistics 82 (1):139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 2000. The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. 1994. Protection for Sale. American Economic Review 84 (4):833–50.Google Scholar
Hansen, Wendy L. 1990. The International Trade Commission and the Politics of Protectionism. American Political Science Review 84 (1):21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscox, Michael J. 2002. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, and Mobility. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, Kala, and Krueger, Anne O.. 1995. Implementing Free Trade Areas: Rules of Origin and Hidden Protection. In New Directions in Trade Theory, edited by Deardorff, Alan V., Levinsohn, James, and Stern, Robert M., 149–87. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O. 1999. Free Trade Agreements as Protectionist Devices: Rules of Origin. In Trade, Theory and Econometrics: Essays in Honor of John S. Chipman, edited by Melvin, James R., Moore, James C., and Riezman, Raymond, 91–102. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladewig, Jeffrey W. 2006. Domestic Influences on International Trade Policy: Factor Mobility in the United States, 1963 to 1992. International Organization 60 (1):69–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, Stephen P., Brock, William A., and Young, Leslie. 1989. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory: Political Economy in General Equilibrium. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Milner, Helen V.. 1999. The New Wave of Regionalism. International Organization 53 (3):589–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Frederick W. 1998. Interpreting NAFTA: The Science and Art of Political Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona. 2004. Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1988. Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Michael P. 2006. Avoiding Invalid Instruments and Coping with Weak Instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (4):111–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Edward John. 1981. The Determinants of Tariff and Nontariff Trade Restrictions in the United States. Journal of Political Economy 89 (1):105–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions. International Organization 41 (2):203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schott, Peter K. 2004. Across-Product Versus Within-Product Specialization in International Trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (2):647–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trefler, Daniel. 1993. Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection: An Econometric Study of U.S. Import Policy. Journal of Political Economy 101 (1):138–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 1995. TRAINS: Trade Analysis and Information System, CD-ROM. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1994. Bureau of the Census. County Business Patterns, 1992. County Data, CD-ROM. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1997. Administrative and Customer Services Division Bureau of the Census. 1992 Economic Census. Disc 1j, Report Series, CD-ROM. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar