Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. International Legal Materials
  4. Volume 23
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 23 - March 1984

Contents

Page 1 of 6

Treaties and Agreements

Judicial and Similar Proceedings

Treaties and Agreements

Judicial and Similar Proceedings

Treaties and Agreements

Judicial and Similar Proceedings

Treaties and Agreements

Judicial and Similar Proceedings

Treaties and Agreements

Judicial and Similar Proceedings

Treaties and Agreements

Judicial and Similar Proceedings

  • Dissenting statement of commissioner pertschdk Gm/toyota joint venture, file no. 821-0159

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 March 2017, pp. 56-77

  • The largest auto company in the world and the third largest auto company in the world are proposing to join together to limit competition in a critical segment of the U.S. market.

    Competition in the U.S. has already been choked off by the Japanese Voluntary Restraint Agreement. Since 1981, when the VRA took hold, the average retail selling price for all new cars sold in the U.S. has risen by 18.8 percent or $1741 more than the consumer price index. Consummation of this joint venture will reinforce this upward pressure on new car prices.

    Battalions of neo-classical economists dancing on the head of a pin cannot obscure the threat that this marriage of competitors poses to the American consumer, nor the fact that this joint venture is a plain and unambiguous violation of the antitrust laws. The Commission's settlement, requiring Toyota and GM to abide by the precise terms of their illegal agreement, hardly qualifies as antitrust enforcement.

Treaties and Agreements

Page 1 of 6