Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:29:11.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological Safety of a Multiple Channel Cochlear Implant Device

Psychological Aspects of a Clinical Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Leonard J. Haas
Leonard J. Haas
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fifty-three deaf patients were screened psychologically and medically for suitability to receive an intracochlear implant. After initial screening for psychological normalcy, candidates were assessed again 1 year postimplant. Isolated deleterious psychological effects were found, and certain aspects of psychological functioning were enhanced. Overall evidence suggests that the implant is not psychologically damaging.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , April 1990 , pp. 421 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Berliner, K. I.Risk vs. benefit in cochlear implantation. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology, 1982, 91 (Suppl.), 90–99.Google Scholar
2Greene, R.The MMPI: An interpretive manual. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1980.Google Scholar
3Haas, L. J., & Dankowski, K.Impact of a multichannel cochlear implant in the post-lingually deaf: Preliminary findings of audiological, psychological and social benefits. Technical Report. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah, 1985.Google Scholar
4Haas, L. J.Psychological assessment of candidates for cochlear implantation. Paper presented at annual meeting, Rocky Mountain Psychological Association,Tucson, Arizona,May 1984.Google Scholar
5Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C.Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. New York: The Psychological Corp., 1943.Google Scholar
6Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S.The Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates, Inc., 1984.Google Scholar
7Lezak, M. D.Neuropsychological assessment. 2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
8Reitan, R. M.Validity of the Trailmaking test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and motor skills. 1958, 8, 271–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Schindler, R. A., & Merzenich, M. M. (eds.). Cochlear implants. New York: Raven Press, 1985.Google Scholar
10Symbion, , Inc. The INERAID Artificial Ear. Technical Report. Salt Lake City, UT: Symbion Inc, 1985.Google Scholar
11Wechsler, D.The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. New York: The Psychological Corp, 1983.Google Scholar