To ensure that health care practitioners at Antelope house, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust in Southampton are providing service users information, advice and stop smoking support in line with smoke free policies in the trust.

Smoking is the single largest preventable cause of ill health and premature death in England. Cigarette smoking causes a wide range of diseases and medical conditions like cancers, heart diseases and stroke.

The prevalence of stroke is extremely high among people with mental health problems especially those admitted to hospital.

Stopping smoking reduces the risk of developing preventable diseases and premture death.

These are the background behind this audit.

Data were collected using the following ways:

Use of desinged questionaire.

Looking into Rio elecronic records

Standard used and compared against was Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust '' smoke free trust policies'

20 cases were looked into and examined.

Most staff are not implementing the Trust no smoking policies well and documentation of the informtion given are not complete.

Most service users prefer to use e-cigarettes.

Most people between 30 and 50 years old range do not smoke.

For those of clozapine, the impact of cigarettes smoking not explained.

The trust smoke free policies are not well implemented by health care practitioners at Antelope house mental health unit, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust in Southampton.

To measure the standard of care provided to patients who had a natural and expected death whilst in secure care at Roseberry Park Hospital, Middlesbrough.

Mallard ward is a low secure psychiatric ward for older aged men suffering from cognitive difficulties and significant physical comorbidity in addition to a severe and enduring mental illness. The patient population is such that it will remain the most appropriate placement for some patients until their death. It is vital that staff members on Mallard ward and indeed all parts of the Trust are aware of the priorities for care of the dying person and ensure that care is provided in accordance with these priorities.

The Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People (LACDP), a coalition of 21 national organisations, published One Chance to get it Right – Improving people's experience of care in the last few days and hours of life in June 2014. This document laid out five priorities for care of the dying person focussing on sensitive communication, involvement of the person and relevant others in decisions and compassionately delivering an individualised care plan.

The data collection tool was adapted from End of Life Care Audit: Dying in Hospital, a national clinical audit commissioned by Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) and run by the Royal College of Physicians. Data were collected from both electronic and paper records. There were three natural and expected deaths in the last two years.

For all three patients, there was documented evidence that they were likely to die in the coming hours or days.

End of life care discussion was held with the nominated persons and not with the patients due to their lack of mental capacity.

The needs of the patients and their nominated persons were explored in all three cases.

All patients had an individualised care plan which was followed.

The palliative care team supported the staff with the care of these patients.

The care provided was largely consistent with the priorities listed.

The national audit compares performance of only acute NHS Trusts with no data to reflect the performance of mental health hospitals. It is imperative that mental health services work in collaboration with physical health and palliative care services so they are able to continue providing a high level of care to this patient group. Clinicians and staff involved in the care of dying patients also need to be adequately trained.

A 2009 independent review commissioned by the UK government to review the use of antipsychotic medication in patients diagnosed with dementia produced the Time for Action report, often referred to as the Banerjee Report. It highlighted the common practise of using antipsychotics in the treatment of Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) and the clinical issues this could raise especially when these medications were not being regularly reviewed. The audti was therefore carried out to determine whether patinets with BPSD in a Community Mental Health Team for Older adults (CMHTOA) in Mid Surrey, who had been diagnosed with BPSD, were being adequately assessed and managed in line with the current guidelines.

Patients with a diagnosis of dementia open to one of three teams in the CMHTOA during the months of October and November 2019 were identified, those being prescribed antipsychotic medication were selected and data from their electronic records collected and analysed to determine if clinicians: a) identified and documented the target behaviours, b) carried out a structured assessment using an ABC chart before commencing medication, c) reviewed the antipsychotic medication 6 weeks after it was commenced.

Of the 87 patients with a diagnosis of Dementia from October to November 2019, 18 were on antipsychotic medication. 100% of these had target behaviours identified and clearly documented, a sixth had a structured assessment prior to starting medication and 61% had been reviewed after the first 6 weeks of starting antipsychotics.

The findings showed that a good proprotion of patients did not have the required structured assessment before commencement of treatment and that more needed to be done by way of improving regular reviews after antipsychotic treatment is commenced.

To Audit Perinatal outcome measures and understand better the population served in order to improve care and understand risks. Our audit standards inculded: paired HoNOS and PBQ recorded on admission and discharge as well as ASQ scores prior to admission.

Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS), Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ) and Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) were recorded on Lorenzo and SystmOne. Scores were collected over 20 months within the same MBU and these were analyzed.

Our audit standards had an overall audit compliancy of 73% with paired HoNOS better than PBQ. Mental health severity mitigated and maternal bonding improved to a significant degree. Depression was the principal presentation as were patients from deprived areas. Only 55% of babies had ASQ scores completed appropriately pre- admission.

As the newest MBU in the country, this an initial foray of perinatal outcomes. Gratifyingly, benefits of MBU admission for mother and baby is evidenced in this snapshot.

To determine the proportion of women of child-bearing age prescribed SV who have the SV ARF filled.

In 2018, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) gave guidance regarding Sodium Valproate (SV) prescription. It acknowledged the significant risk of birth defects and developmental disorders in women of child-bearing age prescribed SV.

Consequently, the MHRA recommendation is that SV must not be used in females of child-bearing age unless: conditions of pregnancy prevention programme are met; other treatments are ineffective or not tolerated; and evidence of discussion of risks with patient or carer and annual review of the risks are documented. The evidences of the above criteria are expected to be documented in an Annual Risk Acknowledgement Form (ARF).

Retrospective study involving systematic search of Trust database to identify women with ID, aged 16–50 years prescribed SV from 2018 to 2019.

18 of 28 patients had ARF filled, a 64% compliance.

The main indications for SV prescription were epilepsy; challenging behaviour; and mood stabilization.

The distribution showed neurology and psychiatrist led prescription initiation equally distributed at 50%.

The ARF compliance was higher in the neurology group (93%) compared to 36% in psychiatrist group.

A review across the 5 ID teams (A,B,C,D and E) of the trust shows variable compliance to ARF compliance (17%,81%,100%,60%,0% respectively) with teams having higher proportion of neurology led SV prescription initiation also having higher proportion of ARF completion compliance (0%,55%,80%,80%,0% respectively).

Conclusion / Recommendation

ARF compliance is below standard at 64%.

Despite the SV prescription being equally distributed between neurology led and psychiatry led, patients whose prescription of SV is neurology led (prescription indication as epilepsy) had better ARF compliance outcome (93%) compared with patients whose prescription is psychiatry led (prescription indication as challenging behaviour or mood stabilization) with 36% ARF compliance.

Organizational difference with dedicated epilepsy nurse in the ID service means patients with epilepsy had reviews of medication and compliance to MHRA guidance in completing the ARF.

There is need to increase doctors’ awareness to review ARF status during patients’ appointment. Information Technology design to flag up out of date ARF may be helpful.

The review of ARF may also flag up consideration of other alternatives: behavioural, psychological, functional and environmental interventions as well as alternative medications like Risperidone for challenging behaviours and other mood stabilizing options. This will minimize SV prescription, which is the original goal of the MHRA guidance.

Best practice in the prescribing of antipsychotic therapy includes monitoring for medication side effects. National guideline SIGN 131 advises the use of a validated side effect scale, for example the Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-effect Scale (GASS). Local recommendation in NHS Lanarkshire advises that patients prescribed antipsychotic therapy should be offered GASS at each contact and after initiation or titration. We aimed to improve compliance with antipsychotic side effect monitoring for inpatients in general adult psychiatry across two hospital sites in NHS Lanarkshire.

We conducted a full-cycle audit. In October 2020, we took a cross-sectional sample of inpatients in general adult psychiatry in University Hospital Hairmyres and University Hospital Wishaw who were prescribed antipsychotic therapy for a functional psychotic disorder. For these inpatients, if applicable, we identified whether GASS had been completed on admission (OA), whether GASS had been completed after initiation or titration of antipsychotic therapy (I/T), and whether GASS had been acknowledged and discussed at consultant-led multi-disciplinary team meeting (MDT). Thereafter, we implemented several targeted interventions in order to improve compliance. In January 2021, we completed the cycle by taking a new cross-sectional sample of inpatients fulfilling identical parameters.

First cycle in October 2020 (n = 27) showed compliance OA of 4.2%, I/T of 9.5%, and MDT of 3.7%. Our interventions included a presentation at trust-wide clinical governance meeting; a presentation at one of the weekly departmental teaching sessions in psychiatry; an email summarising the audit to consultants in general adult psychiatry; meetings with senior charge nurses for each ward; and inclusion of GASS as part of routine admission paperwork. Re-audit in January 2021 (n = 23) showed compliance OA of 11.1%, I/T of 40.0%, and MDT of 21.7%.

Our full-cycle audit led to modest improvement in documented monitoring for antipsychotic side effects. There was relatively greater improvement in prescriber-led outcomes I/T and MDT, suggesting increased prescriber awareness. However, rather than reliance on individual prescribers to ensure compliance, consideration of GASS alongside monitoring of other physical health parameters would likely result in greater and more sustained improvement. In NHS Lanarkshire there is ongoing work to this end, ultimately with the intention to set up a defined antipsychotic physical health monitoring schedule, integrated across inpatient and community care.

Complete an audit of Section 2 and Section 3 Mental Health Act Paperwork in Derby Inpatient psychiatric units using an audit tool developed in a study by Mason et al. (2012).

The 1983 Mental Health Act enables doctors approved on behalf of the Secretary of State under Section 12 to be able to make recommendations for the detention of individuals with a mental health problem where the degree and/or nature, and associated risk to that person's health or safety, or that of others, makes inpatient care necessary. For the detention and the associated deprivation of their liberty to be lawful, it is necessary that the clinical situation meets certain criteria as outlined in the Mental Health Act.

Ward status was reviewed for each inpatient ward in Derby and the first five patients alphabetically, who were detained under sections 2 or 3 were selected. The Mental Health Act medical recommendation documents were reviewed according to the necessary criteria, using an assessment tool generated from a study by Mason et al. in 2012 ‘Compulsion under the Mental Health Act 1983: audit of the quality of medical recommendations’. A junior colleague was trained to analyse Mental Health Act paperwork using the audit tool. Medical recommendations were reviewed and rated as ‘clear’, ‘implied’ or ‘none’ for each criterion.

Evidence of a mental health problem and the nature or degree of illness was well documented. Evidence regarding why informal admission was not appropriate was also reasonable but with room for improvement. Poor compliance was evident mostly in relation to the justification related to risk to health, safety or others, the lowest clearly documented percentage of these appear to be regarding health.

From analysing the documentation, often written justification incorporated general safety as a whole; however health and safety are identified by the mental health act as separate criterion requiring clear justification of each. In a number of occasions people failed to identify which of the three risk categories were relevant for the patient. Potential criticisms of this audit include the subjective nature of the interpretation of clearly explained and implied and that data analysis was completed by a non-section 12 approved doctor. Data were presented at the local weekly academic teaching to raise awareness of the results and a recommendation was made for the subject to be included in the junior doctor induction.

Severe mental illness (SMI) has a significant impact on a person's physical health and mortality. There is a 10–25-year life expectancy reduction in patients with SMI. The majority of deaths are due to physical health conditions. The Royal College of Psychiatry (RCPsych) sets out a standard that new inpatient admissions to Mental Health Services should have routine blood tests performed within 24 hours of admission, unless they have had a recent blood test. The aim of this audit was to review whether blood tests were performed either in the 48 hours preceding admission or the 48 hours after admission to Leverndale Hospital.

Clinical records were reviewed for new inpatient admissions to two general adult wards over a four-month period.

79 patients were admitted (M = 39, F = 40, Age: 18–62 years old). 70/79 (89%) had blood tests performed within the 48-hour timeframe. 5/79 (6%) had a blood test performed after 48 hours of their admission. 4/79 (5%) did not have a blood test. The blood tests performed varied. 51/75 (68%) patients had at least one abnormal blood test. The yield of abnormal blood results ranged from 2% for thyroid function tests to 35% for a full blood count.

This audit has established that the majority of patients had blood tests performed within the 48-hour timeframe. This could be improved by setting up an electronic reminder to prompt the clinician to perform a blood test at 24 hours as per RCPsych guidance if one had not yet been done. The blood tests performed varied. RCPsych guidance does not specify which blood tests should be done. A further scope for this audit could be to review the clinical significance of abnormal blood results to develop a standard set of blood tests for admission.

To audit VTE risk assessment compliance across psychiatric inpatient wards at three different sites within Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (SABP), and to highlight the importance of completing VTE risk assessments for psychiatric inpatient safety and care as set out by NICE guidelines (2019).

Numbers of VTE risk assessments completed (within 24 hours, and those completed any time during inpatient stay) and VTE risk assessments not completed were collected via SABP electronic mental health records. Percentage compliance for each ward and hospital involved in the study were calculated. Chi square statistical t tests were conducted using Excel to check for associations between type of ward (older adult and working age) and VTE risk assessment completion.

A total of 3004 patients were included in the study. Ages ranged from 18–82 years of age, and both males and females included in the study. A total of 2060 were working age (WA) patients (aged 18–64 years) and 944 were older adults (OA) (aged > 65 years).

Across all three sites, more than 90% of all inpatients admitted between May 2018 and October 2020 did not have a formal VTE risk assessment completed. Across all sites, less than 1% of all inpatients had a completed VTE risk assessment done within 24 hours, as recommended by the NICE guidelines. Older Adult wards showed better compliance with VTE risk assessment completion with 38% of patients on one OA ward having had a completed VTE risk assessment, and 28% on another completed OA ward. Being admitted to an OA ward was strongly associated with VTE risk assessment completion (p < 0.05).

OA wards have hosted QI programmes with regards to VTE risk assessment which may be why VTE risk assessment was more likely to have been completed on OA wards. VTE risk assessment compliance overall is inadequate across all sites included in the study. Recommendations include further education for all ward staff on how, why and when VTE risk assessment should be completed, greater accessibility of an improved VTE risk assessment form and for QI initiatives on OA wards to be rolled out on WA wards. These findings have been presented and discussed at regional Trust teaching days, and this audit will be repeated in one year.

Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (ABUHB) isundertaking a review of the Mental Health Liaison Service provision within it's acute general hospitals. The current liaison service is a small nurse led team which is available between 8am and midnight. ABUHB has recently opened a new Specialist Critical Care Hospital with the liaison service moving into a new base. A new model of care has been developed across the healthboard which has stretched the Liaison Service across several sites. Therefore, the liaison service may need to expanded to be able to provide high quality and timely care across a wide geographical area. The audit aims to idenitfy areas in which the liaison service is performing well in while identiying areas that need improvement. This audit may provide a focus for recommendations to enhance the current liaison provision.

The liaison service was audited against RCPsych Psychiatric Liaison Accreditation Network (PLAN) quality standards. PLAN identified eighteen functions of a liaison team and provided details of quality standards within each function. These standards are either considered essential, expected or desirable. An accredited service is expected to meet 100% of essential standards, 80% of expected standards and 60% of desirable standards. Data were taken from a combination of sources including ABUHB policies, service managers and senior clinicians within both mental health and acute services.

When comparing the current liaison service provision in ABUHB, 30% of essential standards were not met and 21% were only somewhat met. Particular domains that were identifed as needing improvement included policies and procedures and urgent and emergency mental health care. 36% of expected standards were met with 41% not met. Notable domains that the service was performing poorly in included governance; induction, and providing teaching and support to acute colleagues. 89% of desirable standards were not met.

The audit idenitifed that the current liaison service fails to meet core standards set out by RCPsych. This audit provides quantitative data to demonstrate that the liaison service is in need of improvement and investment. As a result, enhaving the current liaison service is now a priortity for the health board. A business case is being developed to consider enhancing the liaison service with a view to developing a Consultant led multidisciplinary team. The business case can use PLAN quality standards to make recommendations for improvements to the service.

To identify any problematic polypharmacy in the patient records of those staying in Cherry Ward, an old age psychiatric unit at Highbury Hospital, Nottingham in the calendar year 2018.

Multi-morbidity is defined as more than one long-term medical condition in a single individual and is a factor that is closely associated with polypharmacy, the use of multiple medications concurrently. Appropriate and Problematic are the two classifications of polypharmacy outlined by the King's Fund report, the first describing optimised evidenced-based pharmacological management of comorbidities and the latter to label prescribed medications whose use is not in the best interests of the patient. The risk of drug interactions and adverse drug reactions is increased with polypharmacy, and frail elderly patients are particularly at risk of the side-effects of psychotropic medications used in the management of mental health disorders. Guidelines highlight this group as a key party to be identified when searching for at-risk people.

The electronic records of those admitted and discharged from Cherry Ward in 2018 were reviewed in the period spanning January to May 2019, and the first forty-three patients were analysed in Microsoft Excel using criteria based on the King's fund report and the Medscape and BNF (British National Formulary) drug interaction tools. The Medscape drug interaction checker was used for initial screening; the complete medication list for each patient was entered into it and the number of interactions was displayed with advice on severity. If necessary, the individual interactions for each specific medication could also be cross-referenced in the BNF using the extensive lists provided for each drug. These are also graded from mild to severe.

On discharge, 69.7% (thirty patients) met the criteria for being at higher risk of polypharmacy. One patient became at higher risk of polypharmacy during admission, and another two stepped down from meeting the criteria on admission but not on discharge. Thirty-one of the forty-three patients had at least one interaction recorded; 18.6% (eight patients) had at least one potentially severe interaction.

A substantial proportion of patients in Cherry ward in 2018 were at a higher risk of polypharmacy, reflecting current practice as outlined in the King's Fund report. Problematic polypharmacy is common among older patients hospitalised with psychiatric illness. Recommendations include use of an automated electronic system to investigate and flag up problematic polypharmacy and severe medication interactions.

To assess the uptake of cervical screening in patients under Birmingham and Solihull Assertive Outreach Teams; this included a re-audit of patients under the Central Birmingham Assertive Outreach Team.

Patients with severe and enduring mental illness are known to have poorer physical health outcomes. In Birmingham and Solihull there are 6 Assertive Outreach Teams. These teams manage patients with a diagnosis of psychosis who have complex needs requiring intensive multidisciplinary input and often struggle to engage with health services. The national cervical screening programme aims to prevent cervical cancer by detecting and treating cervical abnormalities. Acceptable coverage is defined as screening at least 80% of people aged 25–49 years within the last 3.5 years and 80% of people aged 50–64 years within the last 5.5 years. In 2018 71.4% of women in England and 70.9% in the West Midlands were screened adequately. An audit of 15 patients under the Central Birmingham Assertive Outreach Team in 2014 showed 46.2% had taken up screening, measured in the last 5 years for those aged 50–64 years and the last 3 years for those aged 25–49 years.

A list was obtained of all female patients under the Assertive Outreach Teams with patients excluded if they were under 25 years or over 64 years or if they were known to have undergone a total hysterectomy. All GP practices with eligible patients registered to them were written to requesting the date of the patient's most recent smear test. Cervical screening was classed as in date if carried out in the last 3.5 years for patients aged 25–49 years or 5.5 years for patients aged 50–64 years.

Out of 127 eligible patients, 110 had correct GP details on their record. Responses were received regarding 101 patients, 48 of whom had in date cervical screening (47.5%). Of 58 patients aged 25–49 years, 26 had in date cervical screening (44.8%). Of 43 patients aged 50–64 years, 22 had in date cervical screening (51.2%).

13.4% patients did not have a known GP practice, increasing the risk of multiple poor physical health outcomes. The rates of cervical screening among Assertive Outreach Team patients are similar to the original audit in 2014 and fall significantly below the national standards and averages. These findings, along with the importance of working together to address the need for physical health monitoring in this population, will be communicated with the local Assertive Outreach Teams and GP practices.

An accurate and complete history is a key component of a medical consultation. Evidence suggests that up to 80% of diagnosis may be made entirely off the patient history. The aim of this closed loop audit was to examine the effects of a clerking pro forma on the quality of doctors clerking histories of new patients admitted to an acute psychiatric inpatient unit, against standards suggested in the New Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry.

Data for this audit were gathered by finding the initial clerking history for inpatients at The Orchard on ECR and RIO. The clerking histories of the 18 inpatients present on 12.10.20 were initially audited. These standards recommend in the in the New Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry include; Patient Identification (ID), Presenting Complaint (PC), History of Presenting Complaint (HPC), Psychiatric history, Medical history, Family history, Forensic history, Social history, Personal history, Premorbid personality, Mental state exam (MSE). After analysis of the results of the first loop, a clerking pro forma was created and distributed to junior doctors to implement. The clerking histories for the subsequent 18 patients to be admitted were then audited and compared.

The results of the first audit cycle were poor. Only patient identification and presenting complaint were present in 100% of clerked histories. Concerningly, only 72% of the histories included the patients’ medical histories, forensic histories were included 44% of the time, and social history just 39% of the time.

The implementation of a clerking history proforma showed improvements in all areas of clerking. Patient ID, PC, HPC, psychiatric history and MSE were now present in 100% of clerked histories. Forensic history showed a statistically significant improvement from 44% to 73% [X2(1) = 5.9; p = 0.015]. Social history showed a statistically significant improvement from 39% to 78% [X2(1) = 5.6; p = 0.018]. Premorbid personality showed a statistically significant improvement from 44% to 89% [X2(1) = 8.0; p = 0.005]. Personal history showed a non-statistically significant improvement from 39% to 56%, as did medical history from 72% to 94%, and family history from 39% to 61%.

In conclusion, the implementation of a clerking history pro-forma has significantly improved the quality and completeness of clerking histories gathered by doctors at The Orchard. This is hopefully increase diagnostic accuracy and improve the quality of care of patients in the hospital.

On 05/08/20, when a new cohort of doctors rotated onto an acute ward, (John Dickson Ward, Maudsley Hospital, London) a new handover tool on MS Teams was introduced, which replaced previously used MS Word document. The new handover tool can be accessed and edited by any of the users in the team. We hypothesised that the introduction of an interactive, live-updated tool would help improve physical health monitoring for patients, especially compliance with ECG taking. The aim of this project was to test this hypothesis.

Authors have reviewed electronic documentation of patients admitted to and discharged from John Dickson Ward between 01/04/2020 and 24/12/2020. Evidence of whether an ECG was performed, was offered but declined by the patient, or was not offered were noted in the final audit. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) Patients admitted and discharged from 01/04/20 – 05/08/2020; (2) Patients admitted and discharged from 05/08/2020 – 24/12/20, and (3) Patients admitted before the intervention date, but discharged after the date (i.e., the period when new junior doctors had rotated onto the ward). Fifty patient records were identified in Group 1, fifty in Group 2, and 18 in Group 3.

Surprisingly, the percentage of patients who had a documented ECG did not improve after the intervention, with 37/50 (74%) of patients having an ECG in Group 1, and 37/50 (74%) of patients having an ECG in Group 2. However, an incidental finding was made that significantly fewer patients received ECGs during the changeover period (Group 3), with only 6/18 (33%) of patients receiving ECGs. The percentage of patients who were not offered ECGs also increased during the changeover period, with 2/50 (4%) in Group 1, and 3/18 (17%) in Group 3 not being offered.

This incidental finding highlights the challenges associated with the junior doctor changeover period. Much time is needed for doctors to adjust to their new surroundings and methods of working, and this may result in basic elements of patient care being overlooked. We surmise that other elements, such as ensuring all patients having regular blood tests and physical examinations, may also be of a lower standard during this period. There is scope for future audits to address this, and for future quality improvement projects to implement changes ensuring medical care remains at a high standard during junior doctor changeover periods.

Growing evidence suggests vitamin D as a contributing factor in psychiatric illness, particularly depression. Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (LYPFT) has a policy recommending that vitamin D levels are checked in all inpatients. The principal aims of this audit were to establish whether vitamin D levels were checked in inpatients and whether oral supplementation was commenced where appropriate, with a pre-determined target of 90% for both. The secondary aims were to assess whether rates of checking and replacing vitamin D, and mean vitamin D levels, differed between Caucasian and non-Caucasian populations.

We investigated adults aged 18–65 years newly admitted to the Becklin Centre, an acute psychiatric inpatient unit of four wards, between 1st December 2019 and 29th February 2020. 140 patients met eligibility criteria and were included in this study, of which 86 (61.4%) were Caucasian. Data were collected between 25th and 28th February 2021 by retrospectively reviewing two electronic patient record systems, Care Director and PPM, and the electronic prescribing platform EPMA. Results were compiled on a pre-determined data collection tool and analysed using Microsoft Excel. We defined insufficiency as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 75nmol/l and deficiency as below 30nmol/l.

Vitamin D levels were checked in 79 (56.4%) inpatients, and the proportion checked differed significantly according to ethnicity (Caucasian = 64.0%, non-Caucasian = 44.4%; χ2 = 4.59, p = 0.032). Of these, 1 (1.3%) had an insufficient sample, 5 (6.3%) had normal levels, 41 (51.9%) had insufficient levels and 32 (40.5%) were deficient. Colecalciferol was commenced for 61 (83.6%) of those with insufficient or deficient vitamin D levels. Rates of colecalciferol prescribing did not differ between ethnic groups (Caucasian = 82.0%, non-Caucasian = 85.0%; χ2 = 0.091, p = 0.76). Mean vitamin D levels did not significantly differ (p = 0.77) between Caucasians (38.3nmol/l) and non-Caucasians (36.2nmol/l).

LYPFT did not meet the target for testing for and treating vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency in psychiatric inpatients. Other blood results were often available when vitamin D levels were not, suggesting a lack of awareness of the guidance. Ethnicity influenced rates of vitamin D analysis but not replacement or mean serum levels. We aim to present our findings to the Trust's medical workforce to raise awareness of the relevant guidance. Given the paucity of psychiatric inpatients with normal vitamin D levels, further research into the role of vitamin D in psychopathology is warranted.

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disabling extra-pyramidal side effect (EPSE) associated with long-term antipsychotic medication, with an incidence rate of 5% per year of typical antipsychotic exposure. The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) is a validated tool for screening for TD and its use is recommended every 3–6 months in those taking antipsychotics. Atypical antipsychotics present a lower risk and have contributed to complacency in monitoring and treatment. The primary aim of this audit was to establish whether AIMS was completed for all patients taking regular antipsychotic medication for three months or more. Secondary aims were to investigate whether patients were informed about EPSEs on initiation, titration and change of antipsychotics, and whether they were assessed for the emergence of side effects during subsequent clinical reviews.

This single-site audit examined the care of inpatients on Ward 4 of the Becklin Centre, a male working-age acute psychiatric ward, between 1st November 2020 and 31st January 2021. Patients aged 18–65 years who were prescribed regular antipsychotics were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included the presence of other neurological movement disorders. 50 patients were included. Data collection took place between 8th February and 6th March 2021; this involved reviewing patient records throughout their inpatient stay on Care Director, an electronic patient record system. Results were compiled using a pre-determined data collection tool and analysed using Microsoft Excel.

For 14 (28.0%) patients there was documented evidence of the provision of verbal information surrounding EPSEs during initiation or change of antipsychotics, and 12 (24.0%) received written or verbal information about wider side effects. For 19 (38.0%) there was a documented assessment of side effects during clinical review following the initiation or change of antipsychotic medication. Of the 33 patients who took antipsychotics for over three months, 3 (9.1%) received an AIMS assessment.

An inadequate proportion of inpatients prescribed long-term antipsychotics were assessed for TD, likely due to a lack of awareness of the relevant guidance. A substantial number of patients were not informed about side effects, suggesting an element of medical paternalism. This study provides opportunity to improve practice by educating the medical workforce and raising awareness of TD symptoms amongst the wider team. Valbenazine is a new FDA-approved treatment for adults with tardive dyskinesia, representing a further avenue for management. Greater focus on patient involvement, and communication surrounding anticipated side effects, is likely to benefit compliance with treatment and improve the doctor-patient relationship.

Evidence suggests children from minority ethnic groups have lower rates of referrals from primary care to CAMHS, are more likely to be referred via involuntary or compulsory routes and less likely to have access to therapies than children from white backgrounds. In order to understand how ethnicity influences individuals and ensure service innovation meet these needs data collected have to be accurate. The Mental Health Services Data Set outlines all children and families receiving NHS care should have ethnicity included as a mandatory data submission and services are performance managed on this.

The aim of this audit to review the documentation of ethnicity for service users in CAMHS. We agreed that 100% of patients within York and North Yorkshire (Y&NY) CAMHS should have their ethnicity documented.

Integrated Information Centre (IIC) was used to collect data on the documentation of ethnicity for patients under Y&NY CAMHS on 27th August 2020.

The total caseload was 4109 patients.

823 (20%) had their ethnicity documented as ‘unknown’ (the clinician had entered ‘unknown’ or the patient has ‘declined to disclose’).

49 (1.2%) patients had no entry regarding ethnicity (missing).

We recommend further exploration to consider why 1 in 5 patients have ‘unknown ethnicity’ documented. We recommend: conducting a refined search considering the percentage of ‘declined to disclose’ and ‘not stated’ within the ‘unknown ethnicity’ section emailing care coordinators for patients with ‘unknown ethnicity’ or ‘missing ethnicity’ conducting a questionnaire to gather the opinions and experiences of clinicians, patients and families when talking about ethnicity

reviewing the process for documenting ethnicity to improve accuracy developing staff training, to promote a culture of confidence and curiosity when discussing ethnicity Following this intervention we will aim to re-audit and consider if this has improved the rates of documentation of ethnicity.

While other mental health care outpatient facilities were moved to COVID-centers in March 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences in Kashmir remained the only functional outpatient facility in the region. It is the only mental health care hospital in the country with a residential facility for psychiatric inpatients catering to the whole population of Jammu and Kashmir, India. The Mental Health Care Act 2017 that neccesitated “halfway homes” is yet to be implemented in the state leaving it's inpatients entirely under the institution's care. This study is to investigate the seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-COVID-19 virus in the 34 residential inpatients in separate male (23 patients) and female (11 patients) wards. This was done as an audit to strategies and measures taken by the institute in protecting it's inpatients.

3 to 5 ml of peripheral venous blood samples were collected and plasma extracted and analysed using the CE-IVD Roche Cobas Elecsys AntiSARS-CoV-2, Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) for the qualitative detection of total Immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM and IgA; Pan Ig) generated against SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The test was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Out of the 34 inpatients, 2 male inpatients tested positive for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (seroprevalence of 5.88%). In comparison, based on a report conducted by the government's Department of Community Medicine and Biochemistry on the 28th of October 2020, out of 2,361 participants in the community, 959 tested positive (seroprevalence of 40.6%).

One of the inpatients that tested positive was re-admitted after testing negative via RT-PCR. The second patient was admitted after being found homeless. He was tested negative on day 1 via RAT and on day 5 via RT-PCR. We believe both of them aquired the infection in the community.

This audit shows that the strategies implemented by the institute were effective in the prevention of the spread of COVID-19. Practical implementations of what works and improvisations are the proven methods of decreasing the mortality and morbidity in vulnerable populations while continuously providing vital mental health services.

In 2019 members of the Liaison Psychiatry Department at Frimley Park Hospital completed an audit of the referrals to the service1. The quality of referrals was found to be highly variable, for example only 28% included a risk assessment and frequently omitted both past psychiatric and past medical histories. As such an intervention was designed involving three parts;

Multidisciplinary education of staff

New and more readily available referral guidelines

New referral form

This re-audit seeks to complete the audit cycle and assess the impact of the intervention.

The first 50 referrals to the Liaison Psychiatry Department of Frimley Park Hospital during February 2021 were assessed using the following criteria:

Staff type, referral source, physically fit for assessment, physical cause ruled out, drugs / alcohol involved, appropriate reason for referral, clinical question asked, did final diagnosis match referral diagnosis, risk assessment included, information about admission included, past psychiatric history included and past medical history included.

The percentage of referrals received for each criterion (e.g. the percentage with a risk assessment completed) was then derived from the data.

There has been a marked improvement in a variety of areas. The percentage of referrals containing a risk assessment increased from 28% to 96%. This is likely due to the risk box now requiring an entry prior to being able to submit the referral form. Similarly the percentage containing past psychiatric history has risen from 38.8% to 90%. Previously 46.2% of referrals contained a working diagnosis which was not consistent with the clinical picture, but again this has improved, with 60% of initial diagnoses now matching the final outcome. There are however areas for improvement. Only 14% of referrals contained a specific clinical question, which is lower than the 20% achieved previously. This may be because the new referral form does not provide a specific free text box for this.

The intervention yielded a marked improvement in the quality of referrals received by the Liaison Psychiatry Department at Frimley Park Hospital, and it is the intention to continue to use the current process. Based on the new results we will look to make small adjustments, for example adding a free text box for a specific clinical question and emphasising the importance of this information.

The audit aimed to assess if patients under the care of children's services in Wessex were transferred at the appropriate age and whether transition referrals to Community Learning Disability teams (CTLD) occurred timely. It also aimed to look at how many patients underwent transitions in a three month period, and if their transition support plan (TSP) was completed. A transition support plan should include chronological information on psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and social support measures. Patients should be referred between the ages of 17–19 but require a justification after 18 years of age.

The BI team was contacted to provide all IDs for patients referred within a three month period between the ages of 17–19. The BI team provided 42 patients with their ID. Patients discharged from services within a short time span were excluded for the following reason: inappropriate referral (9pts), discharged after 1st assessment (6pts), internal discussion (6pts), only referred to Autism team (4pts), moved out of area (1pts). From the initial 42 patients, 16 patients were analysed using the collection tool.

4/16 had a TSP, and only two had a complete TSP and transitioned in another trust and were inter-team referrals.

CAMHS services referred 1/16 patients.

Psychotropic medication was prescribed to 12/16 prior to or on time of referral, but only two patients had a complete psychotropic medication history.

8/16 patients' referral was commenced prior to their 18th birthday, and no information was provided for delay in transfer.

Health records did mention psychotherapy, but apart from 2/16 TSP records, no additional information was available on the modality.

Patients with Intellectual Disability face challenges when transferring from children to adult services. Insufficient referral information may have a detrimental impact on patients wellbeing and long-term care.

Access to a patient's chronological journey through the different children's services allows Adult CTLD health professionals to provide effective care. Historical psycho-social and pharmacological interventions provide a reference point for future interventions.

Concerns included: limited information on most TSP regarding psycho-social and psychotropic treatments, lack of access to CAMHS/CHYPS paperwork and ineffective inter-trust communication for transition patients.

This project highlighted the average number of transition cases in 3 months. It led to changes to the transition pathway, as awareness was raised in trust and CCG meetings to improve patient outcome. CTLD created the new role of transition facilitators to support children's services. They sit in meetings before patients transition referrals.