Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T23:48:10.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a unified theory of reciprocity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2012

Alejandro Rosas
Alejandro Rosas
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia, and Konrad Lorenz Institute (KLI) for Evolution and Cognition Research, 3422 Altenberg, Austria. [email protected]://www.docentes.unal.edu.co/arosasl/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a unified theory of human reciprocity, the strong and weak forms are similar because neither is biologically altruistic and both require normative motivation to support cooperation. However, strong reciprocity is necessary to support cooperation in public goods games. It involves inflicting costs on defectors; and though the costs for punishers are recouped, recouping costs requires complex institutions that would not have emerged if weak reciprocity had been enough.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 36 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2000a) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90(4):980–94. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/117319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R. H. (1988) Passions within reason: The strategic role of emotions. Norton.Google Scholar
Kollock, P. (1993) An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind: Cooperation and accounting systems. American Sociological Review 58(6):768–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, J. O. (1995) Public Goods: A survey of experimental research, In: Handbook of experimental economics, ed. Kagel, John H. & Roth, Alvin E. pp. 111–94. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Milinski, M., Semmann, D. & Krambeck, H. J. (2002) Reputation helps solve the “tragedy of the commons.” Nature 415(6870):424–26. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=11807552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. L. (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46:35–57. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2822435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar