No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2012
Mr. Bryant, in his vindication of the Apamean Medal[a], seems not to be sensible of any other objection to his hypothesis than that taken notice of by the anonymous author there alluded to; though this writer appears so little acquainted either with medals or Greek (for if we retain his reading, ΟΓ. B. APXI. becomes inexplicable), that he scarcely seemed worthy of the notice of a gentleman so eminently distinguished for his learning and abilities. But those who are more conversant with this branch of science entertained doubts of the authenticity of the letters N.Ω.E. and even of the medal itself, nor were the letters N.H.T.Ω.N. on the medal of Sezerus, free from the same suspicions.
page 347 note [a] Page 6, line 21.
page 348 note [b] Sed quod nunc prae mamibus habemus, proculdubio ex alio genuino antiquo typo expressus ac conflatus est; quare suspicandi ansa praebetur, pro genuino, quod vidit Octavius Falconerius, hoc ipsum a sagaci aliquo homine inter videndum postmodum substitutum esse. Mus. Flor. vol. vi. p. 149.
page 349 note [c] See the plate prefixed to these observations, No. 2.
page 349 note [d] Ibid. No. 1.