Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Map
- Introduction: The Philosopher Armed
- 1 Xenophon the Athenian
- 2 Anabasis in Historiographical and Literary Context
- 3 Xenophon Didaskalos: Leaders and Leadership in Anabasis
- 4 Xenophon’s Self-Defence
- 5 Socrates in Anabasis
- Conclusions: The Philosopher Unarmed
- Appendix A Xenophon’s Life and Times
- Appendix B Xenophon’s Writings
- Bibliography
- Index
Conclusions: The Philosopher Unarmed
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 November 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Map
- Introduction: The Philosopher Armed
- 1 Xenophon the Athenian
- 2 Anabasis in Historiographical and Literary Context
- 3 Xenophon Didaskalos: Leaders and Leadership in Anabasis
- 4 Xenophon’s Self-Defence
- 5 Socrates in Anabasis
- Conclusions: The Philosopher Unarmed
- Appendix A Xenophon’s Life and Times
- Appendix B Xenophon’s Writings
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
An enduring challenge for scholars of Xenophon's Anabasis has been to provide an explanation for the work. The difficulty stems from the multifaceted nature of the text, from uncertainty about the author's motivation for writing and from his binary orientation as historian–philosopher. The combined effect, as one writer put it, is that the work has resisted a commonly agreed-upon modern classification. A central argument of this study is that, by way of his focus on leadership and apologia, Xenophon in Anabasis gives us his version of Socrates and demonstrates his worth through Xenophon the character's success. Viewed from another angle, the Anabasis project presents Socrates in an unfamiliar way and philosophical setting: the larger-than-life figure of the man himself, vocabulary, inward gaze and Athenian background that distinguish conventional Socratica are all virtually absent. Yet, as I have tried to show, the work is imbued with a philosophical tenor, mainly through ‘Xenophon’ in the story acting in a manner like Socrates and putting into action principles of Socrates’ teaching. We are implicitly invited to compare the Socrates of Xenophon to other versions of the philosopher, and to other philosophers such as Gorgias, the teacher of Proxenos and Menon, and to judge for ourselves which is most beneficial to us, our friends and country.
As remarked in the Introduction, the philosophical aspect of the text does not rely only on the Socratic connection. The beginning of the work, which has attracted much interest for its absence of any indication of intent, casts it in a quite traditional philosophical frame: a young prince, treated unjustly by his older brother, and driven by his own ambition and sense of rectitude, seeks to unseat the new king and to rule instead of him. At the outset we are prompted to think about right and wrong and the nature of justice and power. The bare outline of the story provided furthermore makes us want to learn more about the Persian actors, who we are already familiar with as historical figures. The journey ahead, grounded spatially and chronologically through the march record, holds out the promise of revealing insights into their world.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Xenophon's AnabasisA Socratic History, pp. 245 - 257Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2022