Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:16:58.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Japan's perspectives on the present Dispute Settlement Understanding negotiations

from PART III - Asian Perspectives on WTO Dispute Settlement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Manabu Miyagawa
Affiliation:
Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Yasuhei Taniguchi
Affiliation:
Keizai University, Tokyo and Member, WTO Appellate Body
Alan Yanovich
Affiliation:
WTO Appellate Body Secretariat
Jan Bohanes
Affiliation:
Sidley Austin LLP
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, I offer my personal assessment of the ongoing negotiations to reform the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), based on my participation in the negotiations from January 2004 to September 2005.

The dispute settlement system in the past ten years

More than 300 cases have been referred to the dispute settlement system of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in the past ten years. Japan has been a party in more than twenty cases; in half of the cases as a complaining party and in the other half as a responding party. I have had the privilege to participate in some of these cases, and have been involved in the different phases of dispute settlement, including: consultations, the panel, the Appellate Body, the compliance panel, the arbitration, and most recently, the decision to suspend concessions and other obligations, which was the first time Japan took retaliatory measures in ten years. I have come to firmly believe that the present dispute settlement system, as a whole, is a masterpiece created with great wisdom by the original negotiators and cared for with much dedication and enthusiasm by WTO Members, panelists, members of the Appellate Body, and the WTO Secretariat.

The many benefits that WTO Members have received from the system include several significant institutional advantages. First, expansion of policy alternatives and faster solution of disputes. Secondly, accumulation of jurisprudence. Finally, increasing collaboration between diplomats, lawyers and law professors.

Type
Chapter
Information
The WTO in the Twenty-first Century
Dispute Settlement, Negotiations, and Regionalism in Asia
, pp. 267 - 281
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×