We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2020
Archivology
IN THIS CHAPTER, I set out how the archive can be understood as concept and trope, as well as material and structure, in order to focus on the specific relevance of this broadly defined term for remembering and commemorating the violence of National Socialism, in particular, the Holocaust. The archive can refer to different things: a physical place of deposit, storage, and preservation; the material housed there; and the order, or house rules, according to which this material is kept and used. Archive material can refer to official documents produced for the purposes of being archived, to other official sources gathered together because an archival authority deems them significant, or to unofficial material— personal letters, family photographs, objects—collected and preserved by their owners or subsequently by others. This expanded definition of the archive reflects the cultural as well as scholarly tendencies in recent decades to question the hegemony of official sources in constructing historical narratives and to use personal, ephemeral, and contingent material in trying to understand the past. As a result, the archive is no longer seen primarily as the site and resource of traditional historiographic pursuit (although it of course continues to serve this function); rather it has become part of the discourse of memory and as such the subject of theoretical reflection about its relation to the work, culture, politics, and ethics of memory. The archive is part of the discourse of memory, but shifts the focus of critical engagement to a new set of questions. According to Ann Laura Stoler, the humanities has witnessed an “archival turn” that can be seen in the shift from “archive-as-source” to “archive-as-subject.”
Refocusing on the archive in this way has led to its re-theorization in the mode of “archivology.” Such theoretical perspectives draw on the insights of Freud and Foucault, who act as what Knut Ebeling calls “agents” of the archive; Derrida, whose Archive Fever is a founding text of archive theory; Achille Mbembe, who has developed an important critique of archival power structures; and more recently Georges Didi- Huberman, who has written about the particular relationship between visual archives and cultural memory.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
