Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:18:23.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Cytology of peritoneum and abdominal washings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Robert A. Soslow
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Teri A. Longacre
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
C. Haynes
Affiliation:
Staff Pathologist, Department of Pathology
C. S. Kong
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Pathology
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal wash cytology has classically been used during exploratory laparotomy to detect occult serosal involvement by a neoplastic process or to demonstrate persistent or recurrent malignancy. In the past, peritoneal wash cytology has had significant therapeutic and prognostic impact, especially for ovarian and endometrial carcinomas. The current FIGO recommendations have eliminated the results of cytologic evaluation of peritoneal washing specimens from the staging criteria for endometrial carcinoma, which de-emphasizes the role of wash cytology in uterine corpus cancer. This change is based on the long-observed undetermined clinical significance of isolated positive peritoneal wash cytology in low-grade, organ-confined endometrial carcinoma (previously considered FIGO stage IIIA). In addition, a positive wash cytology does not correlate with the histologic subtype of endometrial carcinoma, grade, depth of invasion, or the presence of vascular invasion. Positive peritoneal wash cytology does impact survival, but only if other adverse prognostic factors are present. Despite the updated recommendations, continued collection of cytology may provide useful information for making postoperative treatment decisions or in future research studies. The clinical significance of positive wash cytology for cervical carcinoma is less clear. Since we continue to receive peritoneal wash specimens on some patients with corpus cancer either during a staging or exploratory procedure for suspected gynecologic malignancy of unknown primary site, the discussion in this chapter focuses on the interpretation of these specimens.

Type
Chapter
Information
Uterine Pathology , pp. 341 - 348
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kim, HS, Song, YS.International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system revised: what should be considered critically for gynecologic cancer?J Gynecol Oncol 2009;20:135–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariani, A, Dowdy, SC, Podratz, KC.New surgical staging of endometrial cancer: 20 years later. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;105:110–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takeshima, N, Nishida, H, Tabata, T, Hirai, Y, Hasumi, K.Positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer: enhancement of other prognostic indicators. Gynecol Oncol 2001;82:470–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walts, AE.Optimization of the peritoneal lavage. Diagn Cytopathol 1998;18:265–9.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuna, RE, Behrens, A.Peritoneal washing cytology in gynecologic cancers: long-term follow-up of 355 patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:980–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuna, RE, Hansen, K, Mann, W.Peritoneal washing cytology in cervical carcinoma. Analysis of 109 patients. Acta Cytol 1990;34:645–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Ohwada, M, Suzuki, M, Suzuki, T, et al. Problems with peritoneal cytology in second-look laparotomy performed in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2001;93:376–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, SC, Dulaney, ED, Markman, M, et al. Peritoneal cytology as an indicator of disease in patients with residual ovarian carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:851–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Sneige, N, Fanning, CV.Peritoneal washing cytology in women: diagnostic pitfalls and clues for correct diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 1992;8:632–40; discussion 40–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shield, P.Peritoneal washing cytology. Cytopathology 2004;15:131–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, L, Davis, RH.Peritoneal fluid cellular patterns in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;106:979–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selvaggi, SM.Diagnostic pitfalls of peritoneal washing cytology and the role of cell blocks in their diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;28:335–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stowell, SB, Wiley, CM, Perez-Reyes, N, Powers, CN.Cytologic diagnosis of peritoneal fluids. Applicability to the laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis. Acta Cytol 1997;41:817–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, O.Challenges in the interpretation of peritoneal cytologic specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:739–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Weir, MM, Bell, DA.Cytologic identification of serous neoplasms in peritoneal fluids. Cancer 2001;93:309–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gammon, R, Hameed, A, Keyhani-Rofagha, S.Peritoneal washing in borderline epithelial ovarian tumors in women under 25: the use of cell block preparations. Diagn Cytopathol 1998;18:212–14.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pai, RK, Longacre, TA.Appendiceal mucinous tumors and pseudomyxoma peritonei: histologic features, diagnostic problems, and proposed classification. Adv Anat Pathol 2005;12:291–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valente, PT, Schantz, HD, Edmonds, PR, Hanjani, P.Peritoneal cytology of uncommon ovarian tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 1992;8:98–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fetsch, PA, Simsir, A, Brosky, K, Abati, A.Comparison of three commonly used cytologic preparations in effusion immunocytochemistry. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;26:61–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordonez, NG.Value of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing peritoneal mesothelioma from serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum: a review and update. Adv Anat Pathol 2006;13:16–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Ordonez, NG.The diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in distinguishing between peritoneal mesotheliomas and serous carcinomas: a comparative study. Mod Pathol 2006;19:34–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordonez, NG.D2-40 and podoplanin are highly specific and sensitive immunohistochemical markers of epithelioid malignant mesothelioma. Hum Pathol 2005;36:372–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acs, G, Pasha, T, Zhang, PJ.WT1 is differentially expressed in serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous carcinomas of the peritoneum, fallopian tube, ovary, and endometrium. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004;23:110–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×