Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:20:18.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Peter Z. Grossman
Affiliation:
Butler University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, Philip H.Need for Long-Range Energy Policies.” Science 240, no. 4856 (1988): 1121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adelman, Morris Albert. The Economics of Petroleum Supply: Papers by M. A. Adelman, 1962–1993. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Adelman, Morris Albert. “Comments and Discussion on ‘Lessons from the 1986 Oil Price Collapse.’” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2 (1986): 272--6.Google Scholar
Adelman, Morris Albert. “Efficiency of Resource Use in Crude Petroleum.” Southern Economic Journal 31, no. 2 (1964): 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, Morris Albert. “Oil Fallacies.” Foreign Policy, no. 82 (1991): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, Morris Albert. “OPEC as a Cartel.” In OPEC Behavior and World Oil Prices, edited by Griffin, James M. and Teece, David J.. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar
Adelman, Morris Albert. “OPEC at Thirty Years: What Have We Learned?”Annual Review of Energy 15 (1990): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, Morris Albert. “U.S. Energy Policy.” In No Time to Confuse: A Critique of the Final Report of the Energy Policy Project of the Ford Foundation, a Time to Choose America's Energy Future, 27–42. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1975.Google Scholar
Adelman, M. A., Kenen, Peter B., and Meyer, John R.. “Additional Comments.” In Providing for Energy, edited by Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on United States Energy Policy, 32–5. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.Google Scholar
Ahrari, Mohammed E., “A Paradigm of ‘Crisis’ Decision Making: The Case of Synfuels Policy.” British Journal of Political Science 17, no. 1 (1987): 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akacem, Mohammed. “The Future of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.” Journal of Energy and Development 13, no. 1 (1988): 123–39.Google Scholar
Akins, James E.The Oil Crisis: This Time the Wolf Is Here.” Foreign Affairs 51, no. 3 (1973): 462–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, Armen A., “An Introduction to Confusion.” In No Time to Confuse: A Critique of the Final Report of the Energy Policy Project of the Ford Foundation, a Time to Choose America's Energy Future, 1–26. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1975.Google Scholar
Alhajji, A. F.Three Decades after the Oil Embargo: Was 1973 Unique?Journal of Energy and Development 30, no. 2 (2005): 223–37.Google Scholar
Alhajji, A. F., and Huettner, David. “OPEC and World Crude Oil Markets: Cartel, Oligopoly, or Competitive?The Energy Journal 21, no. 3 (2000): 31–60.Google Scholar
Alquist, Ron, Kilian, Lutz, and Vigfusson, Robert J.. “Forecasting the Price of Oil.” International Finance Discussion Paper, 48. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, 2011.
Ames, Robert M., Corridore, Anthony, and MacAvoy, Paul W.. “National Defense, Oil Imports, and Bio-Energy Technology.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 16, no. 1 (2004): 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amuzegar, Jahangir. “OPEC as Omen.” Foreign Affairs 77, no. 6 (1998): 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anadon, Laura Diaz, Mielke, Erik, Henry, Lee, Bunn, Mathew, and Narayanamurti, Venkatesh. “Transforming the Energy Economy: Options for Accelerating the Commercialization of Advanced Energy Technologies.” Energy Technology and Innovation Policy 38. Harvard Kennedy School, 2010.Google Scholar
Anthoff, David, and Hahn, Robert. “Government Failure and Market Failure: On the Inefficiency of Environmental Energy and Policy.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26, no. 2 (2010): 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthrop, Donald. Hydrogen's Empty Environmental Promise (Cato Briefing Papers, 6). Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2004.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth Joseph. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors; a Conference of the Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research and the Committee on Economic Growth of the Social Science Research Council, edited by Nelson, R.R., 609–25. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth Joseph, and Kalt, Joseph P. Petroleum Price Regulation: Should We Decontrol? Studies in Energy Policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1979.Google Scholar
Ashford, Nicholas A., Ayers, Christine, and Stone, Robert F..“Using Regulation to Change the Market for Innovation.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 9, no. 2 (1985): 419–66.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Andrew, and Kehoe, Patrick J.. “Models of Energy Use: Putty-Putty Versus Putty-Clay.” American Economic Review 89, no. 4 (1999): 1028–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerswald, Philip E.The Myth of Energy Insecurity.” Issues in Science and Technology 22, no. 4 (2006): 65–70.Google Scholar
Austin, David, and Terry, Dinan. “Clearing the Air: The Costs and Consequences of Higher CAFE Standards and Increased Gasoline Taxes.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50 (2005): 562–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, Dennis. “Biofuels, Food or Wildlife? The Massive Land Costs of U.S. Ethanol.” In Issue Analysis 30. Washington, DC: Competitive Enterprise Institute, 2006.Google Scholar
Barber, William J. “The Eisenhower Energy Policy: Reluctant Intervention.” In Energy Policy in Perspective: Today's Problems, Yesterday's Solutions, edited by Goodwin, Craufurd D., 205–86. Washington, DC: The Bookings Institution, 1981a.Google Scholar
Barber, William J.. “Studied Inaction in the Kennedy Years.” In Energy Policy in Perspective: Today's Problems, Yesterday's Solutions, edited by Goodwin, Craufurd D., 287–335. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1981b.Google Scholar
Barkenbus, Jack N.Federal Energy Policy Paradigms and State Energy Roles.” Public Administration Review 42, no. 5 (1982): 410–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Peter. “The Solar Derby.” New Republic 172, no. 5 (1975): 14–17.Google Scholar
Barzel, Yoram. Economic Analysis of Property Rights, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bator, Francis M.The Anatomy of a Market Failure.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 72, no. 3 (1958): 351–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago Studies in American Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Beltz, Cynthia A.Lessons from the Cutting Edge: The HDTV Experience.” Regulation 16, no. 4 (1993): 29–37.Google Scholar
Bernanke, Ben S., Gertler, Mark, and Watson, Mark. “Systematic Monetary Policy and the Effects of Oil Price Shocks.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1 (1997): 91–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhar, Ramaprasad, and Malliaris, A. G.. “Oil Prices and the Impact of the Financial Crisis of 2007–2009.” Energy Economics 33, no. 6 (2011): 1049–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935.” Yale Law Journal 45, no. 2 (1935): 293–314.
Blair, John Malcolm. The Control of Oil. New York: Pantheon Books, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohi, Douglas R., Russell, Milton, and Resources for the Future. Limiting Oil Imports: An Economic History and Analysis. Baltimore: Published for Resources for the Future by the Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Booth, Phillip. “Market Failure: A Failed Paradigm.” Economic Affairs 28, no. 4 (2008): 72–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braasch, Gary, and McKibben, Bill. Earth under Fire: How Global Warming Is Changing the World. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Bradley, Robert L. Oil, Gas & Government: The U.S. Experience. 2 vols. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1996a.Google Scholar
Bradley, Robert L., “The Distortions and Dynamics of Gas Regulation.” In New Horizons in Natural Gas Deregulation, edited by Jerry Ellig and Joseph P. Kalt, 1-29. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1996b.
Bradley, Robert L. “The Origins and Development of Electric Power Regulation.” In The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power Industry, edited by Grossman, Peter Z. and Cole, Daniel H, 43–76. London: Taylor & Francis, 2003.Google Scholar
Bromberg, Joan Lisa. Fusion: Science, Politics, and the Invention of a New Energy Source. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Bronson, Rachel. Thicker than Oil: America's Uneasy Partnership with Saudi Arabia. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Brown, Marilyn A.Market Failures and Barriers as a Basis for Clean Energy Policies.” Energy Policy 29 (2001): 1197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Stephen P. A., Raghav, Virmani, and Alm, Richard. “Crude Awakening: Behind the Surge in Oil PricesEconomic Letter: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas 3, no. 5 (2008): 8.Google Scholar
Brown, S. P. A., and Phillips, Keith R.. “U.S. Oil Demand and Conservation.” Contemporary Policy Issues 9, no. 1 (1991): 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, Michael, and Sachs, Jeffrey. “Input Price Shocks and the Slowdown of Economic Growth: The Case of UK Manufacturing.” Review of Economic Studies 49, no. 5 (1982): 679–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryce, Robert. Gusher of Lies: The Dangerous Delusion of Energy Independence. Philadelphia: PublicAffairs, 2008.Google Scholar
Burbidge, John, and Harrison, Alan. “Testing for the Effects of Oil-Price Rises Using Vector Autoregression.” International Economic Review 25, no. 2 (1984): 459–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, John, and Daniel, Rich. The Politics of Energy Research and Development, Energy Policy Studies. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1986.Google Scholar
Calef, David, and Goble, Robert. “The Allure of Technology: How France and California Promoted Electric and Hybrid Vehicles to Reduce Urban Air Pollution.” Policy Sciences 40 (2007): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Calzada Alvarez. “Study of the Effects on Employment of Public Aid to Renewable Energy Sources.” 52. Procesos de Mercado: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 2010.
Cameron, James, and Abouchar, Juli. “Precautionary Principle: A Fundamental Principle of Law and Policy for the Protection of the Global Environment.” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 14, no. 1–27 (1991).Google Scholar
Campbell, Colin J., and Laherrère, Jean H.. “The End of Cheap Oil.” Scientific American 278, no. 3 (1998): 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantelon, Philip L., Hewlett, Richard G., and Williams, Robert Chadwell. The American Atom: A Documentary History of Nuclear Policies from the Discovery of Fission to the Present. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Carr, Cecil T. “Crisis Legislation in Britain.” Columbia Law Review 40, no. 8 (1940): 1309–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Jimmy. Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a President. Toronto and New York: Bantam Books, 1982.Google Scholar
Carter, Luther J.The ‘Good Soldier’ Leaves Interior, a Troubled Agency.” Science 188, no. 4185 (1975): 241–44, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassedy, Edward S., and Grossman, Peter Z.. Introduction to Energy: Resources, Technology, and Society. 2nd ed. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Cassedy, Edward S., and Grossman, Peter Z.. Introduction to Energy: Resources, Technology, and Society. Cambridge Energy Studies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Cathles, Lawrence M., Brown, Larry, Taam, Milton, and Hunter, Andrew. “A Commentary on ‘The Greenhouse-Gas Footprint of Natural Gas in Shale Formations’” by R. W. Howarth, R. Santoro, and Anthony Ingraffea.” Climatic Change 113, no 2 (2012): 525–35.
Cheney, Dick. “The Energy Crisis Is Serious, Not Perplexing.” Vital Speeches of the Day 67, no. 15 (2001): 452–5.Google Scholar
Cheney, Eric S.U.S. Energy Resources: Limits and Future Outlook.” American Scientist 64, no. 1 (1974): 14–22.Google Scholar
Clark, John Garretson. Energy and the Federal Government: Fossil Fuel Policies, 1900–1946. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Clay, Karen, and Wright, Gavin. “Gold Rush Legacy: American Minerals and the Knowledge Economy.” In Property in Land and Other Resources, edited by Cole, Daniel H. and Ostrom, Elinor, 67-95. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2011.Google Scholar
Cline, William R.Global Warming and Agriculture.” Finance and Development 45, no. 3 (2008): 23–7.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H.Discussion.” American Economic Review 54, no. 3 (1964): 194–7.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H.. “The Federal Communications Commission.” Journal of Law and Economics 2 (1959): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H.. “The Lighthouse in Economics.” Journal of Law and Economics 17, no. 2 (1974): 357–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H.. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3 (1960): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, Roger W., and Elder, Charles D.. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Building. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Cobb, Roger, Jennie-Keith, Ross, and Ross, Marc Howard. “Agenda Building as a Comparative Political Process.” American Political Science Review 70, no. 1 (1976): 128–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, James L. “Carter Energy Policy and the Ninety-Fifth Congress.” In Energy Policy in Perspective: Today's Problems, Yesterday's Solutions, edited by Goodwin, Craufurd D., 547–600. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1981b.Google Scholar
Cochrane, James L.. “Energy Policy in the Johnson Administration: Logical Order Versus Economic Pluralism.” In Energy Policy in Perspective: Today's Problems, Yesterday's Solutions, edited by Goodwin, Craufurd D., 337–95. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1981a.Google Scholar
Cohen, Linda R., and Noll, Roger G.. The Technology Pork Barrel. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1991.Google Scholar
Cole, Daniel H. “Climate Change and Collective Action.” Current Legal Problems 61, no. 1 (2008): 229–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Daniel H., and Grossman, Peter Z.. “When Is Command-and-Control Efficient? Institutions, Technology, and the Comparative Efficiency of Alternative Regulatory Regimes for Environmental Protection.” Wisconsin Law Review 5 (1999): 887–938.Google Scholar
Comin, Diego, and Hobijn, Bart. “An Exploration of Technology Diffusion.” American Economic Review 100, no. 5 (2010): 2031–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Inc. Continuing Energy Crisis in America. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1975.Google Scholar
Cooper, Christopher, and Sovacool, Benjamin K.. Renewing America: The Case for a National Renewable Portfolio Standard (Report No. 01-07). New York: Network for New Energy Choices, 2007. .Google Scholar
Copulos, Milton R. Testimony to Senate Foreign Relations Committee. . National Defense Council Foundation, 2006.
Crabb, Joseph M., and Johnson, Daniel K. M.. “Fueling Innovation: The Impact of CAFE Standards and Higher Energy Prices on Energy-Efficient Automotive Technology.” The Energy Journal 31, no. 1 (2010): 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutzen, P. J., Moser, A. R., Smith, K. A., and Winiwarter, W.. “N2O Release from Agro-Biofuel Production Negates Global Warming Reduction by Replacing Fossil Fuels.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussion 7 (2007): 11191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlman, Carl J.The Problem of Externality.” Journal of Law and Economics 22, (1979): 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dam, Kenneth W.Implementation of Import Quotas: The Case of Oil.” Journal of Law and Economics 14, no. 1 (1971): 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Paul A. “Path Dependence: A Foundational Concept for Historical Social Science.” Cliometrica 1 (2007): 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Paul. “The Economics of Natural Resources.” Challenge 22, no. 1 (1979): 40–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Marchi, Neil. “Energy Policy under Nixon: Mainly Putting Out Fires.” In Energy Policy in Perspective: Today's Problems, Yesterday's Solutions, edited by Goodwin, Craufurd D., 395–474. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1981a.Google Scholar
de Marchi, Neil. “The Ford Administration: Energy as a Political Good.” In Energy Policy in Perspective: Today's Problems, Yesterday's Solutions, edited by Goodwin, Craufurd D., 475–546. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1981b.Google Scholar
de Roover, Raymond. “The Concept of the Just Price: Theory and Economic Policy.” Journal of Economic History 18, no. 4 (1958): 418–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deffeyes, Kenneth S. Beyond Oil: The View from Hubbert's Peak. Updated with a new preface. New York: Hill and Wang, 2006.Google Scholar
DeHaven, Tad, and Edwards, Chris. “Business Subsidies.” In Downsizing the Federal Government. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2009.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint.” Journal of Law and Economics 12, no. 1 (1969): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel, and Flavin, Christopher. Renewable Energy: The Power to Choose. New York: W.W. Norton, 1983.Google Scholar
Deutch, John M. “An Energy Technology Corporation Will Improve the Federal Government's Efforts to Accelerate Energy Innovation.” In The Hamilton Project, 23. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 2011.Google Scholar
Dhawan, Rajeev, and Jeske, Karsten. “How Resilient Is the Modern Economy to Energy Price Shocks?Economic Review: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 91, no. 3 (2006): 21–32.Google Scholar
DiCiccio, Carmen Peter. The Rise and Fall of King Coal: A History of the Bituminous Coal and Coke Industry of Pennsylvania from 1740–1945. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 1996.
DiLorenzo, Thomas. “A Note on the Canard of ‘Asymmetric Information’ as a Source of Market Failure.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 14, no. 2 (2011): 249–55.Google Scholar
Doub, William O. “Energy Regulation: A Quagmire for Energy Policy.” Annual Review of Energy Vol. 1 (1976): 715–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowlatabadi, Hadi, Lave, Lester B, and Russell, Armistead G.. “A Free Lunch at Higher CAFE? A Review of Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits.” Energy Policy 24, no. 3 (1996): 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. “Up and Down with Ecology – the ‘Issue-Attention Cycle.’” Public Interest 28 (1972): 38–50.Google Scholar
Drummond, Dylan O., Sherman, Lynn Ray, and McCarthy, Edmond R., Jr. “The Rule of Capture in Texas – Still So Misunderstood after All These Years.” Texas Tech Law Review 37, no. 1 (2004): 1–98.Google Scholar
Easterly, William. The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Paul R., Ehrlich, Anne H., and Holdren, John P.. Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1977.Google Scholar
Ellerman, Denny. “Is Conflating Climate with Energy Policy a Good Idea?”Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 1, no. 1 (2012): 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, John D.Outlook for Energy in the United States.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 27, no. 8 (1971): 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyestone, Robert. From Social Issues to Public Policy: Viewpoints on American Politics. New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
Feige, Edgar L., and Pearce, Douglas K.. “The Wage-Price Control Experiment – Did It Work?Challenge 16, no. 3 (1973): 40–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fesharaki, Fereidun. “World Oil Availability: The Role of OPEC Policies.” Annual Review of Energy 6 (1981): 267–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, David W., and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). Managing Technological Accidents – Two Blowouts in the North Sea: Incorporating the Proceedings of an IIASA Workshop on Blowout Management, April 1978. IIASA Proceedings Series. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Fisher, Eric O’N. and Marshall, Kathryn G.. “The Anatomy of an Oil Price Shock.” Economic Commentary (2006), Nov.
Ford, Daniel F. The Cult of the Atom: The Secret Papers of the Atomic Energy Commission. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1982.Google Scholar
Ford Foundation, Energy Policy Project. A Time to Choose: America's Energy Future; Final Report. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1974.
Fri, Robert W. “From Energy Wish Lists to Technological Reality.” Issues in Science and Technology, 23, no.1 (2006): 63–8.Google Scholar
Fronza, Giorgio, Piero, Melli, and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). Mathematical Models for Planning and Controlling Air Quality: Proceedings of an October 1979 IIASA Workshop. IIASA Proceedings Series. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Fusso, Thomas E. “The Polls: Energy Crisis in Perspective.” Public Opinion Quarterly 42, no. 1 (1978): 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gable, Richard W.The Jurisdiction of the Federal Power Commission over the Field Prices of Natural Gas.” Land Economics 32, no. 1 (1956): 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamow, George. Atomic Energy in Cosmic and Human Life: Fifty Years of Radioactivity. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Gately, Dermot. “Lessons from the 1986 Oil Price Collapse.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2 (1986): 237–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelb, Alan H. and Associates. Oil Windfalls: Blessing or Curse? A World Bank Research Publication. New York: Published for The World Bank by Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Vernon. “Oil Industry Must Have Moratorium.” Oil & Gas Journal 25 (1927).Google Scholar
Gilboy, E. W. “Demand as a Factor in the Industrial Revolution.” In The Causes of the Industrial Revolution in England, edited by Hartwell, R. M.. London: Methuen, 1967.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. Technology, Economic Growth, and International Competitiveness: A Report Prepared for the Use of the Subcommittee on Economic Growth of the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975.Google Scholar
Gisser, Micha, and Goodwin, Thomas H.. “Crude Oil and the Macroeconomy: Tests of Some Popular Notions.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 18, no. 1 (1986): 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Craufurd D. “Truman Administration Policies toward Particular Energy Sources.” In Energy Policy in Perspective: Today's Problems, Yesterday's Solutions, edited by Goodwin, Craufurd D., 63–203. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1981.Google Scholar
Gordon, Richard L.Don't Restructure Electricity; Deregulate.” The Cato Journal 20, no. 3 (2001): 327–58.Google Scholar
Goulder, Lawrence H., and Robinson, Marc S.. “Synfuels: Justifications for and Consequences of Government Intervention.” In NBER Conference on Incentive Effects of Government Spending, 41. Cambridge, MA, 1982.Google Scholar
Green, Kenneth P. “The Myth of Green Energy Jobs: The European Experience.” In Energy and Environmental Outlook, 7. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 2011.
Greening, Lorna A., David L. Greene, and Carmen Difiglio. “Energy Efficiency and Consumption – the Rebound Effect – a Survey.” Energy Policy 28 (2000): 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, James M., and Steele, Henry. Energy Economics and Policy. 2nd ed. Orlando: Academic Press College Division, 1986.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Krueger, Alan B.. “Economic Growth and the Environment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (1995): 353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Peter Z. “Alternative Energy Technologies: Market Solutions.” In Working Papers, 23. Center for the Study of American Business: Washington University (St. Louis), 1992.
Grossman, Peter Z.. “The Apollo Fallacy and Its Effect on U.S. Energy Policy.” Energy Policy 37, no. 10 (2009b): 3880–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Peter Z.. “Does the End of a Natural Monopoly Mean Deregulation?” In The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power Industry, edited by Grossman, Peter Z and Cole, Daniel H., 215–54. London: Taylor and Francis, 2003c.Google Scholar
Grossman, Peter Z.. “Extravagant Excess in the Halls of Hubris: Nuclear Fusion Policy and the MFEE.” Policy History Conference. Columbus, OH, 2010.
Grossman, Peter Z.. “If Ethanol Is the Answer, What Is the Question?Drake Journal of Agricultural Law 13, no. 1 (2007): 149–77.Google Scholar
Grossman, Peter Z.. “Is Anything Naturally a Monopoly?” In The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power Industry, edited by Grossman, Peter Z. and Cole, Daniel H., 11–40. London: Taylor and Francis, 2003a.Google Scholar
Grossman, Peter Z.. “The Logic of Deflective Action: US Energy Shocks and the US Policy Process.” Journal of Public Policy 32, no. 1 (2012): 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Peter Z.. “U.S. Energy Policy and the Presumption of Market Failure.” Cato Journal 29, no. 2 (2009a): 295–317.Google Scholar
Grossman, Peter Z.. “The Zenith of the Natural Monopoly System.” In The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power Industry, edited by Grossman, Peter Z. and Cole, Daniel H., 89–106. London: Taylor & Francis, 2003b.Google Scholar
Grubb, Michael. “Technology Innovation and Climate Change Policy: An Overview of Issues and Options.” 37. London, 2004.
Gulick, Frances Anderson. “Energy-Related Legislation Highlights of the 93rd Congress and a Comparison of Three Energy Plans before the 94th Congress.” Public Administration Review 35, no. 4 (1975): 346–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafele, Wolf, Anderer, Jeanne, and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Energy Systems Program Group. Energy in a Finite World: Report. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1981.Google Scholar
Hall, Thomas E.The Rotten Fruits of Economic Controls and the Rise from the Ashes, 1965–1989. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2003.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James D.Oil and the Macroeconomy since World War II.” Journal of Political Economy 91, no. 2 (1983): 228–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, James D.. “Causes and Consequences of the Oil Shock of 2008.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2009, no. 1 (2009): 215–83.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James D., and Herrera, Anna Maria. “Comment: Oil Shocks and Aggregate Macroeconomic Behavior: The Role of Monetary Policy.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 36, no. 2 (2004): 265–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, James E. Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth about the Coming Climate Catastrophe and Our Last Chance to Save Humanity. New York: Bloomsbury USA, 2009.Google Scholar
Hardwicke, Robert E.Rule of Capture and Its Implications as Applied to Oil and Gas.” Texas Law Review 13, no. 4 (1935): 391–422.Google Scholar
Hargrove, Erwin C. Jimmy Carter as President: Leadership and the Politics of the Public Good. Miller Center Series on the American Presidency. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35, no. 4 (1945): 519–30.Google Scholar
Heinberg, Richard. Blackout: Coal, Climate and the Last Energy Crisis. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar
Heinberg, Richard. The End of Growth: Adapting to Our New Economic Reality, Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers, 2011.Google Scholar
Heinberg, Richard. The Party's Over: Oil, War and the Fate of Industrial Societies. Gabriola, BC: New Society Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
Helm, Dieter. “Government Failure, Rent-Seeking and Capture: The Design of Climate Change Policy.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26, no. 2 (2010): 182–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John P., Jr. Energy: A World Perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Research Institute, 1977.Google Scholar
Herring, Horace. “Energy Efficiency – A Critical View.” Energy Law Journal 31, no. 1 (2006): 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetzel, Robert L.Arthur Burns and Inflation.” Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly 84, no. 1 (1998): 21–44.Google Scholar
Higgs, Robert. Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Higgs, Robert. “The Political Economy of Crisis Opportunism.” Policy Primer 11. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University, 2009.
Hodge, Scott A. Oil Industry Taxes: A Cash Cow for Government. Special Report no. 183. The Tax Foundation, Washington, DC, 2010.
Hogan, William W.Energy Policy Models for Project Independence.” Computers and Operations Research 2 (1975): 251–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, Christopher C. Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed. Washington, DC: Regnery, 2008.Google Scholar
Howarth, Robert W., Santoro, Renee, and Ingraffea, Anthony. “Methane and the Greenhouse-Gas Footprint of Natural Gas from Shale Formations.” Climatic Change Letters 106 (2011): 679–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbert, M. King. “Energy Resources.” In Resources and Man: A Study and Recommendations, edited by National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 157–242. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1969.Google Scholar
Hubbert, M. King. “Role of Geology in Transition to a Mature Industrial Society.”Geologische Rundschau 66, no. 1 (1977): 654–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbert, M. King. U.S. Energy Resources, a Review as of 1972; A Background Paper. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1974.Google Scholar
Huber, Markus, and Knutti, Reto. “Anthropogenic and Natural Warming Inferred from Changes in Earth's Energy Balance.” Nature Geoscience 5 (2011): 31–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Scott H., Sanders, Dwight R., and Merrin, Robert P.. “Devil or Angel? The Role of Speculation in the Recent Commodity Boom (and Bust).” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41, no. 2 (2009): 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, Staffan, and Anna, Johnson. “The Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology: An Analytical Framework and Key Issues for Research.” Energy Policy 28, no. 9 (1998): 625–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Adam B., Newell, Richard G., and Stavins, Robert N.. “Environmental Policy and Technological Change.” Environmental and Resource Economics 22, no. 1–2 (2002): 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jevons, William Stanley. The Coal Question/an Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-Mines. London: Macmillan, 1865.Google Scholar
Johnson, , , William. In The Energy Independence Authority: Report of a Seminar, edited by Murray, Francis X.. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, 1976.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O.Speculative Augmentation in Federal Air Pollution Policy-Making.” Journal of Politics 96, no. 2 (1974): 438–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles O., and Strahan, Randall. “The Effect of Energy Politics on Congressional and Executive Organization in the 1970s.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10, no. 2 (1985): 151–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joskow, Paul A.Energy Policies and Their Consequences after 25 Years.” The Energy Journal 24, no. 4 (2003): 17–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joskow, Paul A.. “Markets for Power in the United States: An Interim Assessment.” The Energy Journal 27, no. 1 (2006): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalman, Laura. Right Star Rising: A New Politics, 1974–1980. New York: W.W. Norton, 2010.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Louis, and Shavell, Steven. Fairness Versus Welfare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States, Studies in International Political Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. “The Perils of the Petro-State: Reflections on the Paradox of Plenty.” Journal of International Affairs 53, no. 1 (1999): 31–48.Google Scholar
Katz, James Everett. Congress and National Energy Policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip, and Stephan, Knack. “Why Don't Poor Countries Catch Up? A Cross-National Test of an Institutional Explanation.” Economic Inquiry 35, no. 3 (1997): 590–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, L. Lynne. “The Knowledge Problem, Learning, and Regulation: How Regulation Affects Technological Change in the Electric Power Industry.” Studies in Emergent Order, 3 (2010a): 149–74.Google Scholar
Kiesling, L. Lynne. “Promoting Innovation in the Electricity Industry.” IEA Economic Affairs 30, no. 2 (2010b): 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilian, Lutz.Exogenous Oil Supply Shocks: How Big Are They and How Much Do They Matter for the U.S. Economy?The Review of Economics and Statistics 90, no. 2 (2008): 216–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilian, Lutz.. “Not All Oil Price Shocks Are Alike: Disentangling Demand and Supply Shocks in the Crude Oil Market.” American Economic Review 99, no. 3 (2009): 1053–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilian, Lutz, and Vigfusson, Robert J.. “Are the Responses of the U.S. Economy Asymmetric in Energy Price Increases and Decreases?” Quantitative Economics 2, no. 3 (2011): 419–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, In-Moo, and Loungani, Prakash. “The Role of Energy in Real Business Cycle Models.” Journal of Monetary Economics 29, no. 2 (1992): 173–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W.Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown, 1984.Google Scholar
Kliet, Andrew N.Impacts of Long-Range Increases in the Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards.”Economic Inquiry 42, no. 2 (2004): 279–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komanoff, Charles. Power Plant Cost Escalation: Nuclear and Coal Capital Costs, Regulation, and Economics. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1982.Google Scholar
Koomey, Jonathan G.Avoiding ‘the Big Mistake’ in Forecasting Technology Adoption.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 69, no. 5 (2002): 511–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornai, János. The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreutzer, David W., and Lee, Dwight R.. “Up-Cheating: Explaining OPEC's Apparent Stability in the 1970s.” Journal of Energy and Development 15, no. 1 (1989): 1–8.Google Scholar
Kunstler, James Howard. The Long Emergency: Surviving the End of Oil, Climate Change, and Other Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Grove Press 2006.Google Scholar
Kydland, Finn E., and Prescott, Edward C.. “Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations.” Econometrica 50, no. 6 (1982): 1345–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Pierre, D. Bruce. “Technology-Forcing and Federal Environmental Protection Statutes.” Iowa Law Review 62 (1977): 771–838.Google Scholar
LaCasse, Chantale, and Plourde, Andre. “On the Renewal of Concern for the Security of Oil Supply.” The Energy Journal 16, no. 2 (1995): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberg, Hans H., Arrow, Kenneth Joseph, Ford Foundation, and Resources for the Future. Energy, the Next Twenty Years: Report. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1979.Google Scholar
Lane, William C. “The Mandatory Petroleum Price and Allocation Regulations: A History and Analysis.” Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute, 1981.
Layard, P. R. G., and Walters, A. A.. Microeconomic Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.Google Scholar
Lee, Bernard S.Synfuels from Coal, AICHE Monograph Series. New York, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1982.Google Scholar
Leeman, Wayne A.The Functions of Market and Government in Coping with the Energy Crisis.” Nebraska Journal of Economics & Business 13, no. 4 (1974): 117–21.Google Scholar
Leonard, Jeffrey. “Get the Energy Sector Off the Dole.” Washington Monthly 43, no. 1/2 (2011): 36–41.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libecap, Gary D.The Political Allocation of Mineral Rights: A Re-Evaluation of Teapot.” Journal of Economic History 44, no. 2 (1984): 381–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libecap, Gary D.. “The Political Economy of Crude Oil Cartelization in the United States, 1933–1972.” Journal of Economic History 49, no. 4 (1989): 833–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libert, Donald J.Legislative History of the Natural Gas Act.” Georgetown Law Journal 44, no. 4 (1956): 695–723.Google Scholar
Lilienthal, David. “Science and Man's Fate.” The Nation 163, no. 2 (1946): 39–41.Google Scholar
Lindsay, Franklin A.Plan for the Next Energy Emergency.” Harvard Business Review 59, no. 5 (1981): 152–68.Google Scholar
Lomborg, Bjørn. Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming. 1st ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007.Google Scholar
Lubell, Mark, Zahran, Sammy, and Vedlitz, Arnold. “Collective Action and Citizen Responses to Global Warming.” Political Behavior 29, no. 3 (2007): 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacAvoy, Paul, Hirs, Edward, Corridore, Anthony, and Ames, Robert M.. “Crude Oil Imports and National Security.” Sarasota, FL: Yale Graduates Energy Study Group, 2011.
Mancke, Richard B. The Failure of U.S. Energy Policy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. Gregory. Principles of Economics. 5th ed. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2009.Google Scholar
Manne, Alan S.What Happens When Our Oil and Gas Run Out?”Harvard Business Review 53, no.4 (1975): 123–36.Google Scholar
Marchant, Gary E.Sustainable Energy Technologies: Ten Lessons from the History of Technology Regulation.” Widener Law Journal 18 (2009): 831–58.Google Scholar
Mattson, Kevin. “What the Heck Are You up to, Mr. President?”: Jimmy Carter, America's “Malaise,” and the Speech That Should Have Changed the Country. New York, NY: Bloomsbury, 2010.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R.Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale Studies in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Max-Neef, Manfred. “Economic Growth and Quality of Life: A Threshold Hypothesis.” Ecological Economics 15 no. 2 (1995): 115–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney G., and Tilly, Charles. Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKie, James W. and McDonald, Stephen L.. “Petroleum Conservation in Theory and Practice.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 76, no. 1 (1962): 98–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, Walter J.The OPEC Cartel Thesis Reexamined: Price Constraints from Oil Substitutes.” The Journal of Energy and Development 11, no. 2 (1986): 213–42.Google Scholar
Meadows, Donella H., Meadows, Dennis L., Randers, Jørgen, and Behrens, William W.. The Limits to Growth: a Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. A Potomac Associates Book. New York: New American Library, 1972.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G.The Hesitant Hand: Mill, Sidgwick, and the Evolution of the Theory of Market Failure.” History of Political Economy 39, (2007): 331–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehlum, Halvor, Moene, Karl, and Torvik, Ragnar. “Institutions and the Resource Curse.” The Economic Journal 116, no. 508 (2006): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, Sumner, and Marquis, Donald G. Successful Industrial Innovation. Vol. 69–17. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 1969.Google Scholar
Michaels, Robert J.A National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Politically Correct, Economically Suspect.” The Electricity Journal 21, no. 3 (2008): 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkel, J. R. “The 2003 Northeast Blackout – Five Years Later.” Scientific American (2008). Available at .
Mitchell, William C., and Simmons, Randy T.. Beyond Politics: Markets, Welfare, and the Failure of Bureaucracy. Independent Studies in Political Economy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Moore, Thomas Gale. Global Warming: A Boon to Humans and Other Animals. Essays in Public Policy. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, 1995.Google Scholar
Mork, Knut Anton. “Oil and the Macroeconomy When Prices Go Up and Down: An Extension of Hamilton's Results.” Journal of Political Economy 97, no. 3 (1989): 740–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morone, Joseph G., and Woodhouse, Edward J.. The Demise of Nuclear Energy? Lessons for Democratic Control of Technology. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Mórrígan, Tariel. “Peak Energy, Climate Change, and the Collapse of Global Civilization.” Santa Barbara, CA: Orfalea Center for Global and International Studies, 2010.
Morris, Kenneth Earl. Jimmy Carter, American Moralist. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Morriss, Andrew P., Bogart, William T., Dorchak, Andrew, and Meiners, Roger E.. “Green Jobs Myths.” Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review 16, no. 2 (2009): 326–473.Google Scholar
Morse, Edward L. “A New Political Economy of Oil?Journal of International Affairs 53, no. 1 (1999): 1–29.Google Scholar
Morton, Rogers C. B.The Nixon Administration Energy Policy.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 410 (1973): 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, David, and Rosenberg, Nathan. “The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies.” Research Policy 8, no. 2 (1979): 102–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C. Public Choice II. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Murray, Francis X. The Energy Independence Authority: Report of a Seminar, CSIS Report. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, 1976.Google Scholar
Myers, Sumner, Marquis, Donald G., and National Science Foundation (U.S.). Successful Industrial Innovations: a Study of Factors Underlying Innovation in Selected Firms. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation; for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
Nadel, Steven. “Appliance and Equipment Efficiency Standards.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 27 (2002): 159–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narin, Francis, Hamilton, Kimberly S., and Olivastro, Dominic. “The Increasing Linkage between U.S. Technology and Public Science.”Research Policy 26, no. 3 (1997): 317–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. Energy in Transition 1985-2010: Final Report on Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Nash, Gerald D. United States Oil Policy, 1890–1964: Business and Government in Twentieth Century America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Nelson, Edward. “The Great Inflation of the Seventies: What Really Happened?” In Advances in Macroeconomics. Berkeley: Berkeley Electronic Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D.A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C.Economic Performance through Time.” American Economic Review 84, no. 3 (1994): 359–68.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C.. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C.. “Ocean Freight Rates and Economic Development 1750–1913.” Journal of Economic History 18, no. 4 (1958): 537–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C., Wallis, John Joseph, and Weingast, Barry R.. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olien, Roger M., and Hinton, Diana Davids. Wildcatters: Texas Independent Oilmen. Kenneth E. Montague Series in Oil and Business History. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. New York: Schocken Books, 1968.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. 3rd ed. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Oswald, James, Raine, Mike, and Ashraf-Ball, Hezlin. “Will British Weather Provide Reliable Electricity?Energy Policy 36, no. 8 (2008): 3212–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouchi, William G. “The M-Form Society.” Human Resource Management 23, no. 2 (1984): 191–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paust, Jordan J., and Blaustein, Albert P.. “The Arab Oil Weapon – a Threat to International Peace.” American Journal of International Law 68, no. 3 (1974): 410–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegram, William M. “The Photovoltaics Commercialization Program.” In The Technology Pork Barrel, edited by Cohen, Linda R. and Noll, Roger G., 321–64. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1991.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 19, no. 2 (1976): 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pernick, Ron, and Wilder, Clint. The Clean Tech Revolution: The Next Big Growth and Investment Opportunity. New York: HarperBusiness, 2007.Google Scholar
Pershing, Jonathan, and Mackenzie, Jim. Removing Subsidies: Leveling the Playing Field for Renewable Energy Technologies (Thematic Background Paper for the International Conference for Renewable Energies, 28). Bonn, Germany: Secretariat of the International Conference for Renewable Energies, 2004. Aavailable at .Google Scholar
Phelps, Charles E., and Smith, Rodney T.. Petroleum Regulation: The False Dilemma of Decontrol. Report (Rand Corporation R-1951-RC). Santa Monica, CA: Rand, 1977.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94, no. 2 (2000): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45, no. 4 (1993): 595–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C.The Economics of Welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan, 1932.Google Scholar
Pimentel, David. “Ethanol Fuels: Energy Balance, Economics, and Environmental Impacts Are Negative.” Natural Resources Research 12, no. 2 (2003): 127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaut, Steven E. “OPEC Is Not a Cartel.” Challenge 24, no. 5 (1981): 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Joseph A. Exxon: Transforming Energy, 1973–2005. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, May 1, 2013.Google Scholar
Pratt, Joseph A. “The Petroleum Industry in Transition: Antitrust and the Decline of Monopoly Control in Oil.” Journal of Economic History 40, no. 4 (1980): 815–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Eric B., and Zupan, Mark A.. “Extending the Economic Theory of Regulation to the Form of Policy.” Public Choice 72, no. 2–3 (1991): 167–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regens, James L., and Rycroft, Robert W.. “Administrative Discretion in Energy Policy-Making: The Exceptions and Appeals Program of the Federal Energy Administration.” Journal of Politics 14, no. 3 (1981): 875–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitze, Arnold W. “Should the Clean Air Act Be Used to Turn Petroleum Addicts into Alcoholics?” Environmental Forums, July/August (2007): 50–60.
Richman, A.The Polls: Public Attitudes toward the Energy Crisis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43, no. 4 (1979): 576–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeway, James. Powering Civilization: The Complete Energy Reader. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.Google Scholar
Robinson, James A., Torvik, Ragnar, and Verdier, Thierry. “Political Foundations of the Resource Curse.” Journal of Development Economics 79 (2006): 447–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocks, Lawrence, and Runyon, Richard P. The Energy Crisis. New York: Crown Publishers, 1972.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M.Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press, 1995.Google ScholarPubMed
Roncaglia, Alessandro. “Research in Fusion as Investment.” Giornale degli Economisti e Annale 48, no. 7–8 (1989): 293–307.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard. “Inheritance before Choice in Public Policy.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2, no. 3 (1990): 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Marc H., and Socolow, Robert H.. “Fulfilling the Promise of Environmental Technology.” Issues in Science and Technology 7, no. 3 (1991): 61–6.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael L. “The Political Economy of the Resource Curse.” World Politics 51 (1999): 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Jim. “Lessons from the Procedural Politics of the ‘Comprehensive’ National Energy Policy Act of 1992.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 19, no. 1 (1995): 195–240.Google Scholar
Rostow, Eugene V.Bituminous Coal and the Public Interest.” Yale Law Journal 50, no. 4 (1941): 543–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runge, C. Ford, and Senauer, Benjamin. “How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor.” Foreign Affairs 86, no. 3 (2007): 41–53.Google Scholar
Ruppert, Michael C. Confronting Collapse: The Crisis of Energy and Money in a Post Peak Oil World. A 25-Point Program for Action. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green, 2009.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwort A. “U.S.-Saudi Relations and the Oil Crises of the 1980s.” Foreign Affairs 55, no. 2 (1977): 494–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. “Policy Change over a Decade or More.” In Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, edited by Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C., 13–39. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A., and Weible, C. M.. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Sabatier, Paul A., 189–220. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Sampson, Anthony. The Seven Sisters: The Great Oil Companies and the World They Shaped. New York: Viking Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A.The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 34, no. 4 (1954): 387–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Robert J.The Moral Equivalent of Chaos.” National Journal 9, no. 43 (1977): 1653.Google Scholar
Schlager, Estella. “A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories and Models of Policy Processes.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Sabatier, Paul A., 155–87. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, James R. “Systems Analysis of the Political Process.” Journal of Law and Economics 11, no. 2 (1968): 281–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmittner, Andreas, Urban, Nathan M, Shakun, Jeremy D., Mahowald, Natalie M., Clark, Peter U., Bartlein, Patrick J., Mix, Alan C., and Rosell-Melé, Antoni. “Climate Sensitivity Estimated from Temperature Reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum.”Science 334, no. 6061 (2011): 1385–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, Donald A., and Rein, Martin. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books, 1994.Google Scholar
Schot, Johan, Hoogma, Remco and Elzen, Boelie. “Strategies for Shifting Technological Systems.” Futures 26, no. 10 (1994): 1060–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, Charles L. “Another Oil Recession.” The New Republic (1975): 8–10.
Selfridge, George P.Floating Nuclear Power Plants: A Fleet on the Horizon.” Environmental Law 6 (1976): 791–830.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. “Structure-Induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice.” Public Choice 37, no. 3 (1981): 503–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Julian L. “Population, Environment: An Oversupply of False Bad News.” Science 208, no. 4451 (1980): 1431–7.
Sinclair, Upton. King Coal: A Novel. New York: Macmillan, 1917.Google Scholar
Sjostrom, William. “Collusion in Ocean Shipping: A Test of Monopoly and Empty Core Models.” Journal of Political Economy 97, no. 5 (1989): 1160–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklar, Scott. “The Role of the Federal Government in the Commercialization of Renewable Energy.” Annual Review of Energy 15 (1990): 121–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, James L. “Inscrutable OPEC? Behavioral Tests of the Cartel Hypothesis.” The Energy Journal 26, no. 1 (2005): 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, James L. “On the Portents of Peak Oil (and Other Indicators of Resource Scarcity).” Energy Policy 44 (2012): 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. Jeffrey. “Legislators Accept Fast-Paced Fusion Program.” Science 210, no. 4467 (1980): 291–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sol, H. G.Processes and Tools for Decision Support: Proceedings of the Joint IFIP-WG 8.3/IIASA Working Conference on Processes and Tools for Decision Support, Schloss Laxenburg, Austria, 19–21 July, 1982. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
Sorrell, Steve. “Jevons’ Paradox Revisited: The Evidence for Backfire from Improved Energy Efficiency.” Energy Policy 37, no. 4 (2009): 1456–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanfield, Sky. “The Mobile Source Air Toxics Rule: How Does the Greatest Reduction Become No Reduction?Ecology Law Journal 31 (2004): 563–87.Google Scholar
Stephens, Jennie C., Wilson, Elizabeth J., and Petersen, Talra Rai. “Socio-Political Evaluation of Energy Deployment (Speed): An Integrated Research Framework Analyzing Energy Technology Deployment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75, no. 8 (2008): 1224–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Neil. “Innovation Starvation.” World Policy Journal 28, no. 3 (2011): 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, N. H.The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, Roger. “Oil Market Power and United States National Security.” PNAS 103, no. 5 (2006): 1650–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stigler, George J.The Theory of Economic Regulation.” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2, no. 1 (1971): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocking, George Ward. The Oil Industry and the Competitive System: A Study in Waste. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1925.Google Scholar
Stockman, David A.The Wrong War? The Case against National Energy Policy.” Public Interest 53 (1978): 3–44.Google Scholar
Stover, Dawn. “The Myth of Renewable Energy.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, web edition at: , Nov. 22, 2011.
Sussman, Brian. Climategate: A Veteran Meteorologist Exposes the Global Warming Scam. Washington, DC: WND Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Tabors, Richard D., Parker, Geoffrey, and Caramanis, Michael C.. “Development of the Smart Grid: Missing Elements in the Policy Process.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, HI 2010.
Tarbell, Ida M.The History of the Standard Oil Company. New York: McClure, Phillips & Co., 1904.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jerry, and Doren, Peter van. “The Case against the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.” In Policy Analysis 21. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2005.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jerry, and Doren, Peter Van. “The Ethanol Boondoggle.” The Milken Institute Review 9, no. 1 (2007): 16–27.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jerry, and Doren, Peter van. “Focus on Energy: The Energy Security Obsession.” The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 6, no. 2 (2008): 475–85.Google Scholar
Tol, Richard S. J. “The Economic Effects of Climate Change.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 23, no. 2 (2009): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, James L., Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. “Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Sabatier, Paul A., 155-87. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. The Vote Motive: An Essay in the Economics of Politics, with Applications to the British Economy (Hobart Paperback No. 9). London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1976.Google Scholar
Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on United States Energy Policy, and Richard B. Mancke. Providing for Energy: Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on United States Energy Policy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.Google Scholar
U.S. Comptroller General. Iranian Oil Cutoff: Reduced Petroleum Supplies and Inadequate US Response. Washington, DC: U.S. Comptroller General, 1979.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. The National Energy Policy Plan: A Report to the Congress Required by Title VIII of the Department of Energy Organization Act (Public Law 95-91). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 1981.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Policy Planning and Analysis. Energy Activity and Its Impact upon the Economy: A Technical Report in Support of the National Energy Policy Plan. Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Policy, 1984.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. National Energy Plan II: A Report to the Congress, Required by Title VIII of the Department of Energy Organization Act (Public Law 95–91). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 1979.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976; Energy Crisis, 1969–1974, Vol. XXXVI. Linda Qaimmaqami, ed. Government Printing Office, 2011.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976; Energy Crisis, 1974–1980, Vol. XXXVII. Steven G. Galpern, ed., Government Printing Office, 2012.
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, and American Imprint Collection (Library of Congress). Report of the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, on the Subject of Manufactures: Presented to the House of Representatives, December 5, 1791. Philadelphia: Printed by Childs and Swaine, 1791.Google Scholar
U.S. Executive Office of the President. Energy Policy and Planning. The National Energy Plan. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, Energy Policy and Planning/U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Energy Administration. Project Independence Report. Washington, DC: Federal Energy Administration/U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office. Sugar Program: Changing Domestic and International Conditions Require Program Changes. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office, 1993.Google Scholar
U.S. National Security Resources Board. The Objectives of United States Materials Resources Policy and Suggested Initial Steps in Their Accomplishment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1952.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, Kamal P., and Mixon, Jr Franklin G.. “Regulatory Capture and the Price of Electricity: Evidence from Time Series Estimates.” International Journal of Social Economics 22, no. 1 (1995): 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Lauren, Valenzuela, Viviana, Botterud, Audun, Zhou, Zhi, and Conzelmann, Guenter. “System-Wide Emissions Implications of Increased Wind Power Penetration.” Environmental Science &Technology 46 (2012): 4200–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Orman, Chandler L.The National Energy Strategy – the Elusive Quest for Energy Security.” Energy Law Journal 13, no. 2 (1992): 251–64.Google Scholar
Van Zandt, David E. “The Lessons of the Lighthouse: ‘Government’ or ‘Private’ Provision of Goods.” Journal of Legal Studies 22, no. 1 (1993): 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vietor, Richard H. K.Energy Policy in America since 1945: A Study of Business Government Relations. Studies in Economic History and Policy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vietor, Richard H. K.. “The Synthetic Liquid Fuels Program: Energy Politics in the Truman Era.” Business History Review 54, no. 1 (1980): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vodra, Richard. “The Next Energy Crisis.” Financial Planning 35, no. 10 (2005): 58–64.Google Scholar
Wagner, Craig A.National Energy Goals and the Crude Oil Allocation Program.” Virginia Law Journal 61 (1975): 903–37.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6, no. 4 (1986): 371–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weimer, David Leo, and Aidan, R. , Vining. Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.Google Scholar
Weiss, Charles, and Bonvillian, William. Structuring an Energy Technology Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Weitzman, , , Martin L. “On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change.” Review of Economics and Statistics 91, no. 1 (2009): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L. “Prices vs. Quantities.” Review of Economic Studies 41, no. 4 (1974): 477–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L. “A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change.”Journal of Economic Literature 45, no. 3 (2007): 703–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyant, John P.The Energy Crisis Is Over…Again.” Challenge 26, no. 4 (1983): 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Irvin L.Energy Policy-Making.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 27, no. 8 (1971): 20–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, Steven N., and Libecap, Gary D.. “Oil Field Unitization: Contractual Failure in the Presence of Imperfect Information.” American Economic Review 75, no. 3 (1985): 368–85.Google Scholar
Willis, Sabrina. “The Synthetic Fuels Corporation as an Organizational Failure in Policy Mobilization.” In The Unfulfilled Promise of Synthetic Fuels, edited by Yanarella, Ernest J. and Green, William C., 71–87. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Willits, Joseph H.The Conclusions and Recommendations of the US Coal Commission as to Labor Relations in Bituminous Coal Mining.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 111 (1924): 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Carroll L.Energy: Global Prospects, 1985–2000. Report of the Workshop on Alternative Energy Strategies (WAES), a Project Sponsored by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.Google Scholar
Quarterly, Wilson, Editors of. “From John F. Kennedy to Jimmy Carter.” The Wilson Quarterly 5, no. 2 (1981): 70–90.Google Scholar
Winger, John G., Emerson, John D., Gunning, Gerald D., and Chase Manhattan Bank N.A. Energy Division. Outlook for Energy in the United States to 1985. New York: Energy Division, Chase Manhattan Bank, 1972.Google Scholar
Winston, Clifford. Government Failure versus Market Failure: Microeconomics Policy Research and Government Performance. Washington, DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, 2006.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Hannah. “Untested Waters: The Rise of Hydraulic Fracturing in Oil and Gas Production and the Need to Revisit Regulation.” Fordham Environmental Law Review 20 (2009): 115–95.Google Scholar
Wolf, Charles. “A Theory of Non-Market Failure: Framework for Implementation Analysis.” Journal of Law and Economics 22, no. 2 (1979): 107–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worth, Kenneth D.Peak Oil and the Second Great Depression (2010–2030). Parker, CO: Outskirts Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Yergin, Daniel. The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1991.Google Scholar
Yergin, Daniel. The Quest: Energy, Security and the Remaking of the Modern World. New York: Penguin Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Zahariadis, Nikolaos. “The Multiple Stream Framework: Structure, Limitations, Prospects.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Sabatier, Paul A., 65–92. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Zycher, Benjamin. “Renewable” Energy Sources for Electricity Generation: Economic Analysis and Outlook. Washington, DC: AEI Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Z. Grossman, Butler University, Indiana
  • Book: US Energy Policy and the Pursuit of Failure
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793417.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Z. Grossman, Butler University, Indiana
  • Book: US Energy Policy and the Pursuit of Failure
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793417.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Z. Grossman, Butler University, Indiana
  • Book: US Energy Policy and the Pursuit of Failure
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793417.013
Available formats
×