Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:52:34.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reading List

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

William Shakespeare
Edited by
Robert Kean Turner  and
Patricia Tatspaugh
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Two Noble Kinsmen , pp. 227 - 229
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Richard. ‘Gender Confusion and Sexual Politics in The Two Noble Kinsmen’, in Themes in Drama 7, ed. Redmond, James, 1985, pp. 69–76Google Scholar
Abrams, Richard. ‘The Two Noble Kinsmen as Bourgeois Drama,’ in Frey (ed.), pp. 145–62Google Scholar
Berggren, Paula S. ‘“For what we lack, / We laugh”: Incompletion and The Two Noble Kinsmen’, MLS 14 (1984), 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertram, Paul. Shakespeare and the ‘Two Noble Kinsmen’, 1965Google Scholar
Boitani, Piero. ‘The Genius to Improve an Invention: Transformations of the Knight’s Tale ’, in Morse, Ruth and Windeatt, Barry (eds.), Chaucer Traditions, 1990, pp. 185–98Google Scholar
Bonelli, Elena. ‘The Elizabethan (Ma)Lady: Lovesickness and the Medicalization of Desire in The Two Noble Kinsmen’, Textus 6 (1993), 43–55Google Scholar
Bradbrook, M.C. ‘Shakespeare and his Collaborators’, in Leech, Clifford and Margeson, J. M. R. (eds.), Shakespeare 1971: Proceedings of the World Shakespeare Congress, Vancouver, 1972, pp. 21–36Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas. ‘The Jailer’s Daughter and the Politics of Madwomen’s Language’, SQ 46 (1995), 277–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenant, William. The Rivals, 1668Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. Talbot. The Swan at the Well: Shakespeare Reading Chaucer, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Philip. ‘On the Design of The Two Noble Kinsmen’, REL 5 (1964), 89–105Google Scholar
Finkelpearl, Philip. ‘Two Distincts, Division None: Shakespeare and Fletcher’s The Two Noble Kinsmen of 1613’ in Parker, R. B. and Zitner, S. P. (eds.), Elizabethan Theater: Essays in Honor of S. Schoenbaum, 1996, pp. 184–99Google Scholar
Frey, Charles H. ‘Collaborating with Shakespeare: After the Final Play’, in Frey (ed.), pp. 31–44Google Scholar
Frey, Charles H. (ed.), Shakespeare, Fletcher and ‘The Two Noble Kinsmen’, 1989Google Scholar
Hadorn, Peter T. ‘The Two Noble Kinsmen and the Problem of Chivalry’, Studies in Medievalism 4 (1992), 45–57Google Scholar
Hamlin, Will. ‘A Select Bibliographical Guide to The Two Noble Kinsmen’, in Frey (ed.), pp. 186–216Google Scholar
Hedrick, Donald K. ‘“Be Rough with Me”: The Collaborative Arenas of The Two Noble Kinsmen’, in Frey (ed.), pp. 45–77Google Scholar
Herman, Peter C. “‘Is This Winning?”: Prince Henry’s Death and the Problem of Chivalry in The Two Noble Kinsmen’, SoAR 62 (1997), 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Clifford. The John Fletcher Plays, 1962Google Scholar
Littledale, Harold (ed.), The Two Noble Kinsmen, The New Shakspere Society. Part 1 Ser. 2, no. 8, 1876. Part 2 Ser. 2, no. 15, 1885Google Scholar
MacFaul, Tom. Male Friendship in Shakespeare and his Contemporaries, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallette, Richard. ‘Same-Sex Erotic Friendship in The Two Noble Kinsmen’, RenD 26 (1995), 29–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Russ. Shakespeare’s Late Style, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullan, Gordon. ‘A Rose for Emilia: Collaborative Relations in The Two Noble Kinsmen ’, in Gordon McMullan (ed.), Renaissance Configurations: Voices/Bodies/Spaces, 1580 -1690, 1998, pp. 129–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, G. H. ‘The Two Noble Kinsmen on the Twentieth-Century Stage’, THStud. 4 (1984), 63–9Google Scholar
Muir, Kenneth. Shakespeare as Collaborator, 1960Google Scholar
Muir, Kenneth. ‘Shakespeare’s Hand in The Two Noble Kinsmen’, S.Sur. 11 (1958), 50–9Google Scholar
Mulryne, J. R. ‘Shakespeare’s Knight’s Tale: Two Noble Kinsmen and the Tradition of Chivalry’, in Jones-Davies, M. T. (ed.), Le Roman de Chevalerie au Temps de la Renaissance, 1987, pp. 75–106Google Scholar
Potter, Lois. ‘Topicality or Politics? The Two Noble Kinsmen, 1613–34’, in Gordon McMullan and Jonathan Hope (eds.), The Politics of Tragicomedy: Shakespeare and After, 1992, pp. 77–91Google Scholar
Proudfoot, Richard. ‘Shakespeare and the New Dramatists of the King’s Men, 1606–1613’, in Brown, John Russell and Harris, Bernard (eds.), Later Shakespeare, Stratford-upon-Avon Studies 8, 1966, pp. 235–61Google Scholar
Richmond, Hugh. ‘Performance as Criticism: The Two Noble Kinsmen’, in Frey (ed.), pp. 163–85Google Scholar
Roberts, Jeanne Addison. ‘Crises of Male Self-Definition in The Two Noble Kinsmen’, in Frey (ed.), pp. 133–44Google Scholar
Shannon, Laurie. Sovereign Amity: Figures of Friendship in Shakespearean Contexts, 2002Google Scholar
Shewring, Margaret. ‘The Two Noble Kinsmen Revived: Chivalric Romance and Modern Performance Images’, in Jones-Davies, M. T. (ed.), Le Roman de Chevalerie au Temps de la Renaissance, 1987, pp. 107–32Google Scholar
Spencer, Theodore. ‘The Two Noble Kinsmen’, MP 36 (1939), 255–76Google Scholar
Thompson, Ann. Shakespeare’s Chaucer: A Study in Literary Origins, 1978Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. Shakespeare, Co-Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays, 2002Google Scholar
Waith, Eugene M. ‘Shakespeare and Fletcher on Love and Friendship’, S.St. 18 (1986), 235–50Google Scholar
Waller, Frederick O. ‘Printer’s Copy for The Two Noble Kinsmen’, SB 11 (1958), 61–84Google Scholar
Warren, Roger. ‘Shakespeare at Stratford-upon-Avon, 1986’, SQ 38 (1987), 82–9Google Scholar
Weller, Barry. ‘The Two Noble Kinsmen, the Friendship Tradition, and the Flight from Eros’, in Frey (ed.), pp. 93–108Google Scholar
Werstine, Paul. ‘On the Compositors of The Two Noble Kinsmen’, in Frey (ed.), pp. 6–30Google Scholar
Wickham, Glynne. ‘The Two Noble Kinsmen, or A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Part II?’, in Hibbard, G. R. (ed.), The Elizabethan Theatre, VII, 1980, 167–96Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×