Book contents
- Twenty Ways to Assess Personnel
- Twenty Ways to Assess Personnel
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction to Selection and Assessment
- 2 Complex and Sticky Issues in Assessment and Selection
- 3 Traditional and Mainly Discredited Assessment Methods
- 4 Self-Report Tests
- 5 Observer Reports
- 6 Behavioural Tests
- 7 Physiology
- 8 Biography
- 9 Big Data
- 10 The Future of Assessment
- Index
- References
10 - The Future of Assessment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2021
Book contents
- Twenty Ways to Assess Personnel
- Twenty Ways to Assess Personnel
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction to Selection and Assessment
- 2 Complex and Sticky Issues in Assessment and Selection
- 3 Traditional and Mainly Discredited Assessment Methods
- 4 Self-Report Tests
- 5 Observer Reports
- 6 Behavioural Tests
- 7 Physiology
- 8 Biography
- 9 Big Data
- 10 The Future of Assessment
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter looks at the future of people assessment. Like many other areas of business there have been many, and rapid, technology-led changes. There are questions about who are or should be assessed; when and how they are assessed; the cost and legal changes in assessment; and how data is stored. The quiet world of academic-led assessment and testing has been ‘invaded’ by people in business eager to sell psychological testing and assessment to a much larger market. Inevitably there are enthusiasts and sceptics: the former claiming how AI computer and neuro-science technology will revolutionise the ease, cost and accuracy of assessment, while the sceptics argue there is still very little evidence for these claims. It certainly is a ‘good time to be alive’ for those interested in people assessment.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Twenty Ways to Assess PersonnelDifferent Techniques and their Respective Advantages, pp. 506 - 525Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Arthur, W. Jr, Doverspike, D., Muñoz, G. J., Taylor, J. E., & Carr, A. E. (2014). The use of mobile devices in high‐stakes remotely delivered assessments and testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(2), 113–123.Google Scholar
Bersin, J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2019). New ways to gauge talent and potential. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(2), 1–7.Google Scholar
Buchanan, T., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Research on the Internet: validation of a World-Wide Web mediated personality scale. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(4), 565–571.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Akhtar, R., Winsborough, D., & Sherman, R. A. (2017). The datafication of talent: how technology is advancing the science of human potential at work. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 13–16.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Winsborough, D., Sherman, R. A., & Hogan, R. (2016). New talent signals: shiny new objects or a brave new world? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, D. S., & Webster, J. (2003). The use of technologies in the recruiting, screening, and selection processes for job candidates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(2–3), 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, J. L., & Tippin, N. T. (2017). Handbook of employee selection. New York City, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Finn, E. S., Shen, X., Scheinost, D., Rosenberg, M. D., Huang, J., Chun, M. M., Papademetris, X., & Constable, R. T. (2015). Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nature Neuroscience, 18(11), 1664–1671.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. (2018). The great divide: academic versus practitioner criteria for psychometric test choice. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(5), 498–506.Google Scholar
Guszcza, J., & Richardson, B. (2014). Two dogmas of big data: understanding the power of analytics for predicting human behavior. Deloitte Review, 15, 161–175.Google Scholar
Iliescu, D., & Greiff, S. (2019). The impact of technology on psychological testing in practice and policy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(2), 151–155.Google Scholar
Illingworth, A. J., Morelli, N. A., Scott, J. C., & Boyd, S. L. (2015). Internet-based, unproctored assessments on mobile and non-mobile devices: usage, measurement equivalence, and outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 325–343.Google Scholar
Landers, R. N., Auer, E. M., & Abraham, J. D. (2020). Gamifying a situational judgment test with immersion and control game elements. Journal of Managerial Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2018-0446Google Scholar
McHenry, R. (2017). The future of psychometric testing. In Cripps, B. (Ed.), Psychometric testing: Critical perspectives (pp. 269–281). London, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Morelli, N. A., Mahan, R. P., & Illingworth, A. J. (2014). Establishing the measurement equivalence of online selection assessments delivered on mobile versus nonmobile devices. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(2), 124–138.Google Scholar
Sherman, R. A. (2019, October 17). Beware these marketing trends in psychological assessment: and why you shouldn’t fall for them. Psychology Today. www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/the-situation-lab/201910/beware-these-marketing-trends-in-psychological-assessment?ampGoogle Scholar
Stamper, C. (2010). Common mistakes companies make using social media tools in recruiting efforts. CMA Management, 84(2), 12–14.Google Scholar
Winsborough, D., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2016). Talent identification in the digital world: new talent signals and the future of HR assessment. People and Strategy, 39(2), 28–31.Google Scholar
Woods, S. A., Ahmed, S., Nikolaou, I., Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. R. (2020). Personnel selection in the digital age: a review of validity and applicant reactions, and future research challenges. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar